there is something about our time, something about her debate but there is something about the way inwhich you read, i give you two examples, she was born on the road as the parents were traveling in 1577. from iran. and her father was in a democratic position. in under the execution of the troubled and that amazing caravan and her mother being pregnant for the first time, the baby girl is born. they come to india which is known for its tolerance and pluralism. and he gets employed in the courts in which you grow. for me to it begin to think about the life of this extraordinary empress. there are two things that i want to give an example of, the philosophy of countering and thinking sources. one to think about the question of her childhood. who was she and how she be brought up. what did her home look like. her father was employed under the court of the future father-in-law. and this is what she was reading. but we have huge amounts of material on what our islamic court books within the terms of which boys and girls were being raised. it was certain books that everybody road. there we

not about monuments. not about good people, not about both sides, okay? and robert e. lee.zi rally. period. here's why it matters. as jews are attacked in san diego and pittsburgh, muslims targeted in new zealand, black churches burned in louisiana, this potus says white supremacy is not that big of a deal. >> i think it's a small group of people that have very very serious problems. >> compare that to what his own fbi director says. >> the danger i think of white supremacists, it's a persistent pervasive threat. >> the only time he really talked about both sides is when he was equating the nazis with those there to fight him. what he called the alt left. that's when he was saying that and that's the only time its applicable because those are the two fights we were having, right? however, what do we see? this president goes after extreme iz la extreme islamist terrorists all the time. never qualifies like he just did about the white supremacists. he even says islam hates us. never said anything that big. that aggressive. but the fact is, white supremacists, far right extrem

what is you talk about? >> guest: she talks about her own assault on the repercussions of that assault. it was an essay published in "the los angeles times" and i remember reading it in the "l.a. times" and thinking oh my gosh so powerful and so well-written. she particularly brings attention to the challenges that black women face when dealing with rape andnt sexual assault today near the minute i read it i wanted to include it in the anthology. she was gracious enough to allow that. >> host: she talked about the "birth of a nation". what is that situation? >> guest: she was involved in the movie and she had a role in the movie. that's what prompted her to write herd piece. it came out that nate parker had engaged in an act of rape. she writes about how she would make that choice and how to stand up and do the right thing or protect her career. she ended up doing the right thing and fortunately she was believed in people supported the decision that she made. i think it was an incredible did for all of us wh

but on an issue about race, about charlottesville, about all the criticism that he took, don, the presidentce bait. that was what that answer was two years ago, race baiting, saying something without really saying it but he doesn't then like to be called out for it and what vice president biden recognized is that he could go after him, as you said, on this issue which is a vulnerability. >> is it smart to bring up robert e. lee? it's like the worst example you can use for a defense. >> he doesn't know anything about history. but he knows that it's controversial and that there are a segment of southerners who revere robert e. lee and he thinks that this is, you know, an issue that people that support him might be on his side with. but he doesn't know anything about history, right? but, you know, you just reminded me of the key issue here. biden talked about trump. if you're donald trump, all you care about a donald trump. he is a narcissist. and so biden made it about trump and that lit trump up, that got his attention. hey, they're talking about me finally and, you know, the reaction, it's

do you want to talk about about that a little bit? we are going there. [laughter] >> i'd also like to say that i had no idea you could die but you have beaten my tale of counterfeit rings in china but nobody died. >> yet. >> might look rose out of when people asked me how i wrote a book about blood. they wanted some kind of transformative epiphany like i was saved by a blood transfusion or i was giving blood and there's a book in it. but now i decided it actually came out of the toilet. [laughter] i wrote a book about toilets and one of the things i learned about toilets is that girls who in the developing world go to schools without toilets and when you consider 2.5 william people around the world have no toilets that's two .5 billion people have no toilets and that's a lot of schools. and girls manage somehow in bushes and alleyways but when they reached puberty sometimes they would drop out of school permanently. that takes a huge toll. it's an economic toll because educated girls broke to earn more money and they have fewer children. an educated girl

this is about 90 minutes. togreat, welcome everyone the second half of our tmi 40, honoring the community and the legacy of the accident at three mile island. i hope you are able to enjoy some dinner. we are at our second and last panel for the evening, our academic panel. it's titled health, action, and public policy. academic contributions. and our panelists will be speaking in order, and you all have about 15 minutes is the idea. is here from penn bete medical center, he will speaking on altered molecular profiles and thyroid cancer in tmi vicinity. is here fromeaker the college of coastal georgia. she will be speaking on lessons for long-term activism on three mile island. is fromd presenter stanford university, and california. she will speak on living in a nuclear world, the politics of knowledge on the effects of radiation. and our last speaker for the evening is from gettysburg college, speaking on her research that is ethnographic postrch and education fukushima. please give a round of applause to our

it is not clear to me what you can deduce about that about trump. that's the reason trump squeaked out a victory. the republicans came back at the end and had a standard race. the numbers are identical to 2012. there was a four-point gap in 2012, there was a three-point gap in 2016. trump had a better distribution of voters in the electoral college and got a little help from comey and so forth. i guess i don't know it will characterize 2020. i guess that is where i would differ. trump has change in insofar as the referendum, relations are some referenda trump is not unlimited government republican. trump is not even a dismantler. he sort of a destroyer of government institutions and norms, but that's a big difference. trump is not interested in entitlement reform. if you would have said five years ago when ryan was rising in the party and romney and had gotten 47% against incumbent democratic president come if you accept whatever republican president and republican congress and you would have zero entitlement reforms, zero on any serious attempt to

we know the polls about how americans feel about congress. about how they feel about the media. about how they feel about even the supreme court at this point. really, the only institution that seems to have a widespread support in the united states would be the military. how are we to think about the lack of faith in institutions as a harbinger for trouble for democracy going forward? because you make the good point that populism is not necessarily antidemocratic, but it is a force that says go around your institutions go around your , elites directly to your people. that is the definition of populism. this breakdown of faith and -- in institutions, which madison would have said was absolutely essential to self-governing, is that one reason to be concerned about democracy? niall: i think it is a wake-up call to the institutions. you mentioned the media, it is true that the public respect for the media and free press is very low in the united states. can you blame people? can you blame people for having a low view of professional politicians? of legislators in congress? it seems

i don't want to talk about it. i don't want to talk about it. you know why? he didn't want to lie and say he hadn't talked to them. that's why. so he skirted it. now we have reporting on what this is all about. this is important new information. it just happened on our watch. let's discuss with people really deep in this story. mark mazzetti. he helped break the news for "the new york times" about what we're about to see and why. him and garrett graff who know so much about mr. mueller and his press conference. here's one thing garrett graff knows and now we all do, mueller is not going to be at that press conference tomorrow. that's a significant exclusion. mazzetti, let's dovetail what we learned from "the washington post" what your reporting was. what did you learn? >> what we reported today was that there had been numerous discussions between justice department officials and white house lawyers in recent weeks about the substance of the report. we never said that there was a full briefing and we don't still know what of the mueller findings have been brie

so little about what jesus says everything about. there are more than 2,000 scriptures that said what god calls us to be about is how we care for the children and the strange and the immigrant and the poor. you hardly ever hear him say anything about that. yet he tried to present himself as being authentic christianity, but what you see from past comments, it's a form of hypocrisy. >> what's interesting about mayor pete is that he does not shy away from his religion. he does not shy away from christianity and reject the idea that there are some christian who is take issue with his homosexuality. he believes in a fate as he interprets it that is inclusive. >> sure. this is not new. frederick douglas took issue with the slave master religion because he loved the religion of jesus christ. he had to hate the slave masters. the slave masters told the slaves they ran away from slavery. there were those who used to say black and white people marrying was a sin. it never said anything about segregation being a sin. graham and his not fee lin

>> well, momentum is about change, about expectations versus where you are now.idates whose fund-raising numbers we have seen so far, the only one that really surprised me, impressed me, pete buttigieg. more donors than kamala harris, for somebody that was totally unknown on the national stage, mayor of a pretty small city in indiana who has been getting a ton of buzz and attention, more people learn about him, the more they like him. my question is is it a fling or something they want to settle down with. i talked to donors that committed to other candidates but are giving to him because they like him at the moment. don't view him as a threat. once he climbs in polls and becomes a threat to bigger candidates, i think he will be in for negative coverage, things change, and it will be a whole new world. >> what do they like about him? >> he is fresh, young, new. old adage, democrats want to fall in love. he is different. we heard about all of the other candidates, they have been preparing to run for years. we know them. he came out of nowhere and has this very com

if you want to know what the fight about kavanaugh was all about, this is it. case to get to the supreme court which would overturn roe v. wade. let me just say one of the states under the microscope on this is georgia. and there was a senator in georgia who said we will reclaim our rights when we reclaim your seat, a woman, senator jen jordan. that is it. if you saw a lot of women getting mad in 2018. this goes to the supreme court, this is happening in these states. all of those pink hats are coming out again. and there is very little that makes women more angry than male politicians coming in to separate them from the decisions and the very difficult decisions they have with their doctors. this is going to be a political fire storm. >> niger, you were running this a little bit with the states that are codifying roe v. wade, codifying infanticide. they're not doing anything that's not the law of the land now. roe v. wade is only infanticide if you want to call it that and put that label on it. this is not new moves. is that hand in glove with this effort? >>

no question about it.t think anyone here should be afraid to go home and say look we've been able to deliver legislation. it's up to the senate now to take that up. i'm pretty proud of what we've been able to do so far. >> let's talk a little bit about president trump's taxes. he talked about them again using the same kind of excuse or, you know, reason for not having released them as he left earlier today. take a look at what the president had to say. >> i would love to give them, but i'm not going to do it while i'm under audit. it's very simple. remember, i got elected last time, the same issue with the same intensity which wasn't very much because frankly the people don't care. >> do you think people don't care about seeing the president's taxes? >> people care. people care, they want to know if the president's personal financial interests impact his public decision-making, and they also want to know that the administration that he leads will follow the law. the tax law of the united states includes se

this was incredibly important it isn't about what we should do but think about. and then to have a much better understanding of the trade-offs so this is the spirit it is intended to be given. and then five key threads and those key distinguishing feature in it is incredibly dynamic. it is changing every second of every minute. to have scale of the order of magnitude and there is a great chapter in the book with intelligence requirements to be much more forward leaning and those requirements are extraordinary. having written about that reconnaissance he just needs to be ubiquitous, real time because the targets are always changing. and there is a wonderful chapter and then to adapt to be in the interest. and then with those interesting dynamics. we will just highlight two of them. we need to think about targets. so they are not good at truth telling her fact-finding with the authoritarian advantage but many actually have a hard time to encourage dissent meeting their response only means they can sustain our advantage for longer. we need to think about targeting a

it, and interestingly enough, he spoke about how -- he spoke about bob mule and the book -- bob mueller and the book, and he spoke about how bob mueller would find no collusion, and that's what he was there to look for. but the politics we kind of stayed away from, because we really wanted to focus on the way donald trump interacted with capitol hill. we wanted this to be a book that if you really wanted to understand how congress worked both in donald trump's era and in other eras, this would be a book you can read any time in history where you can understand the road map to getting things done and the road map to gridlock. >> let's talk about paul ryan. >> one of the things we found that i think we didn't really know necessarily going in, but was how actually bad their relationship was throughout the entire two years of his presidency. so you know, we sat down with the president in the oval office, and we were asking about his feelings of different members, of the leadership and we reminded him, you know, paul ryan was there before the election, he said oh yeah i called him foxhole pa

ask your doctor about xeljanz xr.n "unjection™". we see two travelers so at a comfort innal with a glow around them, so people watching will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com". who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com got it.r pickup order? ran out of ink and i have a big meeting today. and 2 boxes of twizzlers... yeah, uh... for the team... the team? gooo team.... order online pickup in an hour. now get an extra 20% off with coupon. at office depot officemax. onmillionth order.r. ♪ there goes our first big order. ♪ 44, 45, 46... how many of these did they order? ooh, that's hot. ♪ you know, we could sell these. nah. ♪ we don't bake. ♪ opportunity. what we deliver by delivering. title x for affordable natbirth control and reproductive health care. the trump administration just issued a nationwide gag rule. this would dismantle the title x ("ten") program. it means that physicians cannot tell a patient about their reproductive health choices. we hav

tell us about that. >> that's right. this came in a court filing just minutes ago in the case of roger stone. that former confidant of the president. in the filing justice department lawyers provided a road map of what we'll see in the coming days explaining the report with fewer redactions. we'll go to select members of congress. we can assume that may mean the gang of eight but they did not specify. we're trying to confirm that. it really puts congress in an interesting position as we know they have been pressing for days to see the full mueller report. this only says they will see it with fewer redactions. as the attorney general has explained, it's being redacted for grand jury information as well as ongoing information. that would pertain to the case of roger stone. they are saying they will get a report with fewer redactions on ongoing investigations. >> interesting. pamela, you think the president and the attorney general are trying to control the narrative once we get to see this redacted version of the report by

you talk about your cousins. you talk about aunts.an you talk to us about the role of role models in your life and how it can affect -- you know all of these young people here. justice sotomayor: the most important role model in almost all our lives are our parents, aren't they? our mothers, our fathers. they're the real heroes in life. not only do they work hard and help support us and they send us to school, and they help us learn, but they also give us the fire inside of us, the thing that makes us good people, right? because mommy teaches you right and wrong and daddy does too. but they also teach you how to be kind and how to be nice. and they make you feel special. and so for me, i was lucky because i had role models in the women in my life that i just adored. my grandmother memorized poetry. and at family parties -- and there's a picture of her -- [speaking in spanish] right in the beginning of the book. that's me walking with her to go shopping on a saturday. and that's us shopping in the -- [speaking in spanish] for the chick

talking about religion in a way we talk about the constitution. martin luther king said the constitution is a promissory note that hasn't been fulfilled. pete is saying it's about how we feel. and that's how he's critical of the vice president not because of his religious beliefs but because of how he's acting on it. particularly with the democratic party when barack obama got the nomination in 2006 z, it's the rhetoric they're using. and mayor pete is using a rhetoric that talks about the potential of america and makes people feel good about america and that's why he makes people feel good in the polls. >> he's also doing something unobvious. the obvious play would be to bat at donald trump but he went for pence on an interesting issue. what do you think? >> i think this is an amazing product. i'm going to call him a product, a brand for a second. when you look at the brand attributes, he's a road scholar, harvard, afghan vet, gay, religious, traditional in the way he lives his life and obviously brilliant. there's two paths for him and he's goin

this is really from your standpoint not even about influence. it is about disclosure. as originally conceived it wasn't about disclosure. it was about the soviets and the nazis and others having malign influence. >> the idea is foreign governments and foreign principals is the term under the statute, foreign individuals can speak and they can speak about issues important to americans but when they speak they need, the american public needs to identify the speaker so the problem is when foreign governments or foreign individuals speak through intermediaries and it is not apparent that the real speaker is not that intermediaries who is often an american person but rather a foreign government. >> one of the issues you brought up when we were talking about this is this concern you have on the first amendment side. if in fact this is about transparency it is not about curtailing the right to speak but there have been very substantial changes in the sense that in the sense that what i would call foreign propaganda, organizations that call themselves are tea and others have b

he's lied about lower deductibles, he's lied about lower premiums. he's lied about everything involving health care. how bad of a situation is this for republicans if that is where donald trump decides to fight? >> when you talk to republican leaders on capitol hill, it's really bad. it's not just the last election, it's almost every election if you had to bet on what topic is the most important topic, it's health care because it touches everybody. one of the simple rules of politics is when you take stuff away from people, that's really hard in politics. when people had coverage and doesn't have coverage, it's really hard to explain you're going to have a plan for two years. one of the things that's bedevilled republicans is they don't have a plan that would cover everyone, would cover preexisting conditions, would bring down your health insurance costs. they've struggled to come to a unifying position and they end up fighting about court fights, which is are basically taking away parts of obamacare, some of which people may not like but some of whi

. >> it's not about politics. it's about patriotism. there's a threat to our democracy in terms of our constitution. >>> don't ask, don't tell. the white house denying that top officials were told not to raise their concerns about russian election interference in 2020 with the president because it rehiends minds him. >> i'm worried about multiple foreign foreign actors. >>> veep. joe biden faces unique obstacles. how much will name recognition help or hurt? >>> good day president trump sounding off against house subpoenas. defiant in the fame of congressional demands. >> i say it's enough. get back to infrastructure. get back to cutting taxes. get back to lowering drug prices. that's what really we should be doing. >> the president's combative message competing what he told the washington post in a call tuesday night saying there's no reason to go any further. mr. trump's strategy to slug it out in court telling key current and former staff to innognore congressional subpoenas. >> this subpoena is ridiculous. i've been the most transpar

no, i'm not talking about populist politics. i'm talking about populist politics.y and i'm talking about the ability to think at the same moment, the struggle against homophobia and the struggle for poor people and against anti—semitism and for people of colour. watto tried to do is articulate all those together and not dismiss poor people in saying there are some racist and anti—semitic people. it is a com pletely anti—semitic people. it is a completely different struggle. that is why im supporting this movement from the very beginning. from when the yellow vest movement immersed those things that people are saying, i cannot pay my rent, cannot feed my child, you know, soon it will be christmas and i'm not able to buy gifts for my children, for christmas, so for me it was the emergence of reality, finally, within the political field. emergence of reality, finally, within the politicalfield. and of course this emergence of truth comes with ugly violent things like homophobia and everything, but we can fight for both and against one and for the other both at the sam

>> he knows nothing about david duke, he knows nothing about right extremists and he knows nothing aboutay, april 12th. ef mike barnicle, national affairs analyst for nbc news, john heilemann, the cohost -- >> wikileaks. >> i love wikileaks. >> white house correspondent is with us and columnist and associate editor for the "washington post," david ignatius is here. >> do we have the other part of those clips? >> we do. >> are we going to play those clips? >> do you want to play them now because i was thinking we could save them for later because we've got a lot of really big news to talk about. >> all the time he talked about wikileaks you mean? >> it really was a lot like david duke too, where you know. >> this called a deep tease? >> the sunday before supertuesday he claimed to know nothing about david duke, claimed to know nothing about the klan and in 2000 he said he wasn't going to run under a forum ticket because he wouldn't run on any ticket with somebody like david duke. >> in the case of the wikileaks situation again and again in the campaign and mika, we'll get to that later in

what is that about?ave you ever sniffed a stranger's honestly. >> he's a a handy guy. >> tucker: it's an old factory thing. what is that? >> i'm just saying, he is a handy guy. he is a touchy guy. so when you have him on your show, you could ask him what that's been about. >> tucker: t i'm going to ask him. i'm not going to judge him. do you like to sniff people? totally fine. >> i think it's a question of humanity, and i think if we turn our back on that, shame on all of us. >> tucker: i love it. richard, great to see you tonight. jussie smollett has still not admitted what it is to everyone else in america. he staged a fake hate crime. instead, he's telling us that the two body builder brothers he worked with attacked him apparently while wearing white face. he was confused. he didn't know it was them. the attorney of those brothers joins us after the break. ♪ >> it features exclusive shows. a commentary by me, your favorite fox personalities. we give it to you straight on all the issues that we, the a

about?aller: it's hard for me to say. i don't watch mainstream news. i usually watch c-span because i like to see it as it's happening . i don't want summit he also explained to explain it to me, you understand what i'm saying? like so rather than watching cnn or fox and they report on it, i would rather watch live footage to see what actually happens. so i think a lot of the news is fake news because i think that people are opinionated and they like to kind of twisted or bended in ways that accommodate them, does that make sense? host: defined fake news? well, like, like i said. you either hear it from the horse's mouth, or you let somebody else tell you what the horse said. steve, atwater, california, good morning. morning- caller: good to you, sir. i watch the correspondents and i watched the news this morning and they made the comment that there was an important figure missing last night from the dinner and they said donald trump and i laughed because the important person missing is , th

it's not about her. the issue is about the hate. it's not about heather. >> yeah. your approval, or to make sure that you were okay? i mean what was the upshot of his call? >> probably to make sure i was okay. apparently there were rumors rolling that i was devastated and traumatized and none of those things are true. i think it was traumaizing for some other people in charlottesville to suddenly have that thrown up at them on the screen and i did mention that to him that probably had triggered some other people. >> meaning who? like heather's friends or who are you referring to? >> survivors. people who were there on the ground both times for those actual living scenes and not just the video. >> when you and i last spoke it was right after the conviction of heather's killer and you were talking about the foundation and you were talking about your life mission and you felt that you didn't want heather's voice and her message to be silenced and you felt that you wanted to fight against hate. so i wonder today now that you've had a chance to process it a little bit,

about the taxes. the democrats have done nothing in the last hundred days with policies to help the american people. that is why i switched, because i did not get into politics and when they told me -- when trump came in i got into it and learned a lot of things i could not believe. host: you say you are sick of hearing about the mueller probe. are you concerned at all about the cost of the mother probe after 14 -- of the mueller probe after 14 months? the democratsd of making policies, that is what i learned. they are just always trying to and find anything on anybody instead of taking care of their own house and making policies. host: sam brodey, on that question about the cost of the mueller probe. you looked into this idea and that level of concern on capitol hill and how it has changed. up to theead completion of robert mueller's investigation, you saw top republicans raising concerns about the amount of money that had gone into the special counsel. i followed up with a lot of top republicans aft

i've heard you talk about things that scare evangelicals about the way democrats talk about this. share with us, what is their reaction? how should we be talking about a climate in a way that invite people into these small tents. >> a small thing we can all agree on is people need to know there's hope first off. that's the number one thing i talk about when i go out is hope. the number one story is it's not all about government action, it has to be kormt and individu. what do you in central iowa except come out and hear the new preacher in town come to speak a little bit. the whole town comes out, 500 people fills the college auditorium. i said the first thing we can all do is be energy efficient in our own households. bl blah blah blah. do the hole thing. a man came up to me afterwards, with a genuine and sincere heart, said you are the first person who ever said i could do something about climate on my own. by the way, i farm 3,000 acres of corn. i'm going to be reducing my fert limplt, my pesticides and planting ground cover crops to restore the soil. that's one of the things.

what about revenue goals? what do you hope a return on your investment would look like at "the texas tribune?" orn: at "the texas tribune," the american journalism project? eugene: if you could give us both, that would be great. " has what "the tribune done well, almost uniquely well, is diversify revenue sources in a way that a lot of nonprofit news organizations have not been able to. when you look at the annual in personnel that do major guest solicitation, number should work, commercial sponsorship work, the return on investment is more than five times the annual compensation fully burdened for overhead and benefits of this people. what we are trying to do at ajp is replicate that, probably not at that success level, but what makepe is we are going to organizations higher revenue producing, technology enabling people, who then will produce some multiple of that in perpetuity. thatcome fond of saying when a source of journalism philanthropy thanks of funding a newsroom, you almost guarantee that you will co

what is it about your background? caller: my background is social work and essentially cultural affairs and my main concern and what i am seeing after watching and being in the trenches since the child in the 1960's and see what we went through as a nation to get closer to equality at the cost of lives and beatings and shootings and assassinations and to see it all having to be redone, to see the civil rights act being dismantled before my eyes, to see the courts being who callith ideologues themselves constitutionalists while passing an abomination -- we areens united under siege. --t: john is an un-dependent independent in new mexico. you just heard him lay out how he wants to see this freshman class use what he says is their leverage. do you agree, disagree? what do you want freshman lawmakers to focus on? some house democrats who took a no corporate tax pledge are getting pressure to ditch that promise. three freshman house democrats said more senior members suggested they walk back there pledge. do you agree. ? g

i just went to an event a month ago that was all about services, not about hardware.teering the ship in that direction right now. melissa: scott, speaking of that specifically, when you look at apple tv plus, the way to stay in the game is to spend a lot of money and obviously apple has deep pockets on that front but you have jeff bezos is out there who is willing to spend a fortune on content in order to have original content. netflix is spending a ton of money. apple wants to get into that. they're bidding up the prices for all the different television products. we all have to become executive producers and creators to sweep in the cash. what do you say with the horse race because it is expensive? >> i would throw in google with some of the gaming. that is another thing apple talked about, some of the arcade that they're doing. you're light right, that really begs the question with streaming and everything. five behemoths are fighting for that streaming dollar where does that dollar get spent? it does come down to content. we'll see how the smoke clears the next thr

no talk about after the war. the generals fighting the war and the reporters covering the war talked about the light at the end of the tunnel and whether or not we could see it or not. and none of us could see it. but it was such a dark time that the most optimistic phrasing you could get out of our commanders in the vietnam war was that they could see sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel. the light at the end of the tunnel that they could see and we couldn't gave us no hope in the darkness. and i know that is the way these days feel for some people. but there is a light at the end of the tunnel, 18 months from now you are guaranteed an end to the darkness of trumpism and a president who defends people who say jews will not replace us. just 18 months from now if enough people show up to vote to change the president. most people disapprove of donald trump today and every day of his presidency, especially the days he defends nazis and racists. i can't promise he won't be reelected, but you cannot pretend yo

he lied to you about his business. about his payoffs. about his efforts to obstruct.of russian interference. about what people around him did and what he knew about what they did. how has he handled it? as expected. first, he expected the report as good. because he wasn't being charged with a crime. but as the other aspects have come out, he says total b.s., he may not be a felon, and i say may because it's pretty clear. mr. mueller believes that if he weren't president his actions were actionable under law. but he's not acted like a man of integrity or a leader. you can't read the report and think he has behaved as we should want. so what? too many of you will shrug, not because you like what he did but because you just don't expect any better. i get it. i'm 48. i've been steeped in the best and worst of politics since i was 7. i was raised by a man who believed serving his state meant being his best, a three-term governor. people didn't agree with everything he did. he had his fights and his weaknesses but he was a man of integrity. he told people the truth and he d

you'll have the left making these arguments about segregation, about women, about the crime bill, but on the right who are mocking it. it's going to be a furious two-pronged attack, and it's going to be very hard for joe biden. >> and he's been a terrible fund-raiser. he's not been a good fund-raiser. you see with bernie, 900,000 people that can give or and over and over. that's going to be a challenge. >> but again, let's be careful with bernie. bernie had a bad day yesterday at the she the people event in a roomful of black women. a whole roomful of women groan because you're talking about your civil rights work in the '60s. to your point, joe biden can talk about, yes, that was my record then but here's what i've done since then. it's not just going to be answering for it in the past but he actually has something to talk about. a record to talk about of things he's done for communities of color, for all these different parts of the party. >> you just talked about the fund-raising idea, david. biden was on a conference call earlier this week. according to politico he said fund-raisi

when we talked about the labor movement, we are talking about frances perkins. this was all her handiwork. quite an extraordinary record of achievement. i spent 20 years at the "washington post," and i went all over the country for the "washington post." it was a wonderful life, education going to visit places and learn new things. and as i traveled around the country writing business stories, i begin to realize how little i knew about the history of the working people of america. it's something that really isn't taught. in the late 1990s, i wrote a series of articles on sexual harassment. and i heard a lot of chilling stories about places where there been an imbalance of power, where people were able to use their power to force people to do things they didn't want to do. there were people who were sort of trapped in a cycle of abuse, and a lot of times the stories were really very bad stories, really much more akin to criminal activity than most of us had realized. and i heard all of these stories all around the country, and i began to suffer myself what psycho

what is it about? david: i walk the reader through -- my theory is our life is made up of -- most of us -- four big commitments -- to a family, to a vocation, to a philosophy or faith, and then to a community. the fulfillment of our life depends how well we choose those commitments and execute on them. mastery comes in the vocation section, choosing your career, what you're called to do in life. mastery is getting really good at it. uestion - i forgot the q -- rian: master, what's it about. david: once you have chosen your location, how do you get good at what you are doing? brian: we have some video that goes back quite a bit to the 1950's. you write about this in the book. it's out of context, people will say, what in the world is this doing here, but let's watch a man named ed sullivan, who hasn't been around for years. ed: we have a great all-star guy along but right now singing a medley of some of the songs you enjoy to the extent of boosting them over the million mark, here is -- elvis pressley!

whening about --jason: using about jes staley.econd story is deutsche bank/commerzbank yet again. there is a lineup of banks that want to buy commerzbank, and deutsche bank is still like, we need a plan b. jason: what is really interesting to me is, because i love the story in the bloomberg right now, it essentially says here is the lineup of people whom you be interested in this. paribas,redit, bnp socgen, santander even. tos is an attractive asset someone, and even more attractive to someone else that it ultimately is to deutsche bank. david: i also noticed there's no line of suitors for deutsche bank. [laughter] david: if any of those come in, what has deutsche bank got left? talking to matt miller earlier, i understand plan b would be a sped up plan a. that doesn't sound very good to me. alix: either way, you have to raise some kind of money if you want to buy something, and you have to cut costs. david: they've been saying that for years. alix: exactly, and it hasn't done anything. -- i haveclear in no clear vision on what th

we're talking about the future of work. the ilo is talking about the future of work.verybody right now seems to be talking about the future of work, and i sometimes get a little bit alarmed. i hear these very, very precise and authoritative and sometimes apocalyptic prescriptions about how many jobs are going to be created, how many are going to be destroyed ten, 20 years down the road by robotics and ai and all the rest. and my answer to that type of prediction is, you know, it's not about technology. it's not solely about te technology. the future of work is what we decide we want it to be. the lesson of history, the lesson of roosevelt and perkins is they transformed the way america designed its work, not by any process of technological change or even political external circumstances, redesigned the american world of work by conscious decisions. not even according to a predetermined plan because a lot of it was made up as it was going along, was it not? and that's a lesson for our time. and if you allow me the luxury of it, i mean, what are the greatest achievement

my excellence isn't just about color. it isn't just about covering grays. it's about respect. excellence crème from l'oreal. even more care, even more beautiful color. and grays 100% covered. excellence creme from l'oreal paris. color with respect. because you're worth it. ♪ hey, who are you? oh, hey jeff, i'm a car thief... what?! i'm here to steal your car because, well, that's my job. what? what?? what?! (laughing) what?? what?! what?! [crash] what?! haha, it happens. and if you've got cut-rate car insurance, paying for this could feel like getting robbed twice. so get allstate... and be better protected from mayhem... like me. ♪ my mom washes the dishes... ...before she puts them in the dishwasher. so what does the dishwasher do? cascade platinum does the work for you, prewashing and removing stuck-on foods, the first time. wow, that's clean! cascade platinum. there is wisdom in how nature protects and it inspired an all-new toothpaste from burt's bees®. it fights cavities and freshens breath. made with ingredients you can trust. for a smile that's a true force of nature.

it is about effective versus ineffective. it is about chaos versus not chaos.u look at the metrics, does he have a wall, no. are numbers down as far as deportations? ja yeah. everything sort of works again him and he basically admitted that by firing the top rungs of the dhs. >> and it is the best political argument that on the one thing that he promised his base he would do, build a wall and deal with illegal immigration, he has failed. >> absolutely. and look, he can say that, well, i declared a national emergency and then the senate did what they did, it is going to be tied up in the courts. it won't happen. and it is not happening. >> so will he did it? >> look, this is scary to think that it is going to be harsher because the original zero-tolerance policy didn't deter them, people just too more dangerous paths to get here. and we have two young people under the age of ten who died. and so the idea that it is unamerican because the idea that america is now turning their backs on asylum seenkkers whichs their legal right, it is very depressing in it time th

i could talk about with these people more than one hour and about each of these books. we have a lot to come in in a short period of time. for we get started i need to tell you you should silence your cell phones please and personal recording is not allowed and also i will give you the first reminder is that after the session each of the others will be signing their books at signing area one which is marked in a map in your festival program. as i said, three traffic books and will hold them up and start the conversation. w my far left seating arrangement, john ward's book, camelot and, kennedy versus carter and the fight that broke the democratic party. susan page, the matriarch and barbara brush in the making of an american dynasty. to my right, former los angeles times collie, miriam powell, the browns of california and the family dynasty that shaped a nation. someone who is about to turn 75 i lived through a great number of the event ascribed in these books. as i was saying to miriam before the program started, the one i first met remember isbe as a hih school freshm

talk about collusion.he collusion is on the part of bad actors in the media, democrats in congress who made up this whole lie for two years. think of the actual damage that has been done to the country and done to the president because of this complete calculated lie on the part of politicians who are embarassed that they lost an election. i think, that, for people now, i think the president, i don't think the president wants to drop this stuff now. i think he wants to prosecute the political case that he was wronged. stuart: he was on the attack this morning. he called the russian probe an attempted coup. charles, thanks so much for joining us. big day. i'm moving on real fast. thank you, charles hurt. >>> i'm going to call it fireworks on capitol hill yesterday. turning point u ask. a's candace owens testifying about the rise of white nationalism on social media. the democrats tried to trap her. she fired back. you're going to see it all later this hour. >>> alexandria ocasio-cortez going after chris tin

and so i suspect we're going to have a lot to read and process and there about in that section about the president's he behavior in office. >> and rod rosalind, it seems like the justice department has had a rocky day. the president announcing the attorney general's press conference before the attorney general's office was able to announce it self. is it your sense or reporting at this point that the attorney general has been rocked by the public reaction and the washington reaction tonight including demand by chairman of house committees that he not have the press conference tomorrow? >> i -- i don't have a good sense of what their reaction to the reaction is. just logic tells you that it was not their preferred course of action to have the president announce the attorney general's press conference before he announced it. you know, i do feel like something about some pieces of this plan have been very much in flux and you know, i wouldn't be at all surprised if the times and other things work out a little differently tomorrow. if for instance you don't see an effort to get that repo

that would tell us a lot about whether there are other things we should be concerned about. >> and we should learn more within the next week or so if we are to believe the attorney general as he has indicated he will be putting out the report. although it sounds like that it will be fairly redacted. what did you make of the comments from the attorney general during the hearing yesterday and today, that he won't just be redacting information about the president but also about private individuals as well? >> that is incredibly important. it is very important for the justice department to redact information not just from grand jury testimony but that implicates individuals in potential acts that would be interpreted as libelist when they are not under investigation by the justice department. that is not the justice department's purview. and in fact that was one of the reasons why james comey was criticized so heavily by the acting deputy attorney general because he had impugned hillary clinton when she was not under investigation. that is pretty standard justice department policy. as far

when we talk about your it, what exactly are we talking about? are these legally manufactured drugs? >> of your covers a broad spectrum when we talk about ascribed of you, narcotic painkillers thatha are fda approved and when we talk about illicit opiates, mainly heroin and fentanyl more recently. that's what's driving most of the office. not manufactured but no but elisa, some of which is smuggled in, some mail order. >> where is it manufactured? >> china, hong kong, it's coming in from mexico. >> how does it get there? >> it comes across our borders but there's a story in the book about a young man selling the next in the parking lot of a local community college and actually fentanyl he mail order off the dark web and crushed into pills. that's the thing about talking to your kids about pills. they are not necessarily what they think, what it might take on the bottle. it could be pills thatth are actually fentanyl. hearing stories about that all the time, people dying. >> the focus of your book is legally manufactured opioid from here in the u.

let's talk about freedom. let's talk about security. as a veteran i am so sick of the idea that security or patriotism along to one party. these are american values. stitched to myas shoulder, actually it was velcro. on when i went into afghanistan was not the property of one party or the other. but i will say that only one party seems to be concerned with some of the security threats that will face us in the 21st century. you know, we need to come out and talk about how there is more to security and putting up a wall from sea to shining sea. [applause] global security means that we are actually competing with the chinese model, which is being held up as an alternative because america looks so divided, confused, and weak right now. we need to talk about cyber security at a time -- talk about something or you can put up a wall to deal with it, not when cyber security threats are only going to increase. it would help if we had people in charge who understood what cyber security is. [laughter] it would alsog: help, when we are getting read

so at this point, i'm not prepared to speak about that. >> you wrote the book about so many legends. and i was wondering if you could talk a little bit about putting herself at the post. [inaudible] you come into segregated community what was it like there, under? >> to the changer asking? >> i think it started changing in the 70s. in part because after african-americans as a freedom movement started, the riots, the kerner commission report, after that, the women's movement started. gloria simons first article of at the black power, woman power. and that really also change the newsroom. because women started suing. the women at the new york times sue, the women at the washington post suit. the black people at new york times daily news sued so there was the change people took action when they saw and recognize the reality that there were women managers, they were not black editors, they were not latino editors. so i think a lot of the change was pushed by those people who decided they were going to do something about it. that definitely changed the atmosphere inside. and i remember on

panelists talk about ways they could address the issue about hate related violence hosted by the lawyers committee, this is about 90 minutes. >> all right. let's get started. today we're pleased to be joined by a panel of wonderful experts the bios on the back page of the flyer you've received. kristen clark, president of the national lawyers committee for civil rights underlaw in d.c., dr. casey miller, research analyst for the intelligence project at the southern poverty law center. alfred wilson, co-founder of the heather heyer foundation and maya berry. each panelist will come up to the podium and provide opening remarks and then we'll open the floor to questions. everyone should have a notecard in their chair. these are for questions. so if you have a question, jot it down on the notecard and raise it up and one of the stop hate team members will collect it from you. and if the team members can raise their hand really quickly so everyone knows. great. we look forward to their conversation and i'll turn it overs to kristen. >> good afternoon. welcome and thank you for being here toda

it's not about having owned slaves, it's about when there was a line drawn in the side, about what this country would be about which side you were on. to say washington, jefferson, that's about picking men in the moment in which they lived and what their weaknesses were. it's different than the civil war and the decisions made then. i'm telling you, he's touching these buttons for a reason and i'm not saying he's a bigot, i'm not saying he holds these things in his heart. he keeps them in his head, and that's dangerous. >> what a man says, so is he. >> swadling a baby and then deciding whether to execute it. never thought i'd hear that. not a president. >>> this is "cnn tonight," i'm don lemon, i'm in las vegas and this is where there's a new terror plot tonight coming on the heels of the deadly synagogue attack in poway. this is where memorial services were held today for lori kaye, a 60-year-old woman who died trying to defend the rabbi from her shooter. listen to this very powerful moment from when oscar stuart, who tried to tackle the gunman when his gun jammed, they led the entire