actor chris fue el encargado de presentar las nominaciones al oscar junto a la presidenta de la academiaolo por lgoros individuales son esuerzo colectivo de artistas. >> guarom continuo diciend oqeu esta conmovido por la nom,inmación de sandra bullock. >> le agradezco por su constancia y dedicación de encontrar la verdad de este personaje. >> nominados a mejor película son varios actores. >> christian bale. >> en la contienda de mejor actoir están bale, leonardo dicaprio, mathew mccortney, mejor actriz >> mejor actor de reparto coper, gill, laurence y com omejor actrizx de reparto. >> le contamos que instlaron en aeropuerto de colorado las primeras cajas de amnistia donde los pasajeros que desconocen que es ilegal la marihuana pueden deporistar las drogas sin consecunecia. >> introducirlas en aeropuertos es ilegal, con estas cajas aydua auqe la gente no pierda los vuelos >> toda la marihuana dentro de esas cajas será destruida dijeron. >> buenas noches. >> buenas noches. >> ♪ ♪ >> quÉ tal? es jueves 16 de enero de 2014, estos son los titulares, cientos de hectÁreas calcinadas, miles de p

this broadcast model of academia that still exists today. weis a remarkable thing and are not even indulging k-12 where people are lined up taste on your date of manufacture. it is comedic in some ways. prettyty and tenure seem trivial in the context of the world we are living in. what sebastian is offering is something that is imaginative, but he is not just talking about iting a lecture and putting online. he is talking about a new model of education that takes the latest in terms of how we learn and incorporate it into a new platform of engagement that arguably will make learning more interesting and meaningful and lifelong. you're not just paying lip service to this, you have something to announce? >> today we put up a website and announced we have an open dedication line where new companies are working with us and we will be talking to more education outlets. inquiries, that the students that we graduate, what we want to do is this thing over here. can we participate in the curriculum for higher education? hard because of conflicts betw

academia as we knew it and i assume you are roughly my age, your 30s. [laughter] people don't read it because in part people in college don't read it. i taught for many years at cooper union. it's a very small school. everyone is on full scholarship because the top 2% of american colleges. one of the reasons i retired was my students did not read anymore. it was pointless. how can you talk about anything when they have no vocabulary? they were good kids, hard-working nice kids but it's not just not reading american literature. they're not reading anything. as for these writers, through the 1970s and 80s i would say they were at the very top of people's list. you have to read f. scott fitzgerald. you couldn't be considered a college graduate but what is considered a college graduate now is not much. >> eight question up here. >> hi. i was wondering how you talk about liberalism the way he described it in the democratic party as a whole. it's kind of hard if you project contempt for the middle class and bourgeois values and it seems to me that -- in the p

and given that legal academia blogging has become an established part of the legal academia when i see the professors at harvard and stanford r. starting blogging and i think we are getting away from that. >> from this gentleman over here. >> much of the conversation has been about -- >> please present who you are. >> a lot of the conversation results from medicaid and the power of the state, but there was another issue that has come up or could actually raise the question of the direct tax and of course roberts did on his decision. but it was based off of the tax load which argued that it was a direct taxes and therefore it was unconstitutional. >> have you looked into that issue any more and do you think that maybe you should have raised that issue more with the court or that maybe that would have been what -- >> good question. we did deal with the issue briefly because it was not an issue that had been given a lot of attention by other judges. so we didn't think it was going to be a major issue but we did address it in everything. , which i worked on. so we did raise it but here's t

incapacidad despuÉs de reportar una herida en el cuello y stress posttraumÁtico y luego abriÓ una academiala organizaciÓn. >> tambiÉn hay un consultor de pensiones de 89 aÑos. >> los Índices de muerte por cÁncer han descendido 20% en las Últimas dos dÉcadas gracias a la reducciÓn del tabaquismo, el incremento de la prevenciÓn y una mejor detecciÓn. no obstante, la lucha contra este mal continÚa. el estudio de la sociedad americana del cÁncer pronostica 1.700.000 nuevos casos para este aÑo. incluidas 586.000 muertes. indica tambiÉn que el cÁncer se es el de la segunda causa de muerte en el paÍs tan sÓlo detrÁs de las enfermedades del corazÓn. la oficina del condado de los angeles de uno de sus peores momentos con mÚltiples acusaciones y demandas millonarias por abuso policial. hoy el lÍder de esta organizaciÓn dijo que abandonó su cargo a finales de este mes. tenemos las razones que compartiÓ el polÉmico sheriff para justificar su retiro. >> en medio de una verdadera crisis administrativa, el jefe del alguacil del condado mÁs grande del paÍs anunciÓ que se retire del cargo al que fue electo

. >> quisiera pedir informes de la academia de policÍas. >> muy bien, aquÍ estÁn los requisitos paralla y tu abuelita margarita eran muy unidas, un poco como yo y su mamÁ de ustedes. >> oye, tÍa, digo, no mÁs pa saber ¿no? ¿cÓmo te has sentido? es que me dijo la sirena que el, que el enzo iba a ir a verte ¿quÉ onda? >> simÓn, hijo. >> pues ya, desembucha ¿cÓmo te fue? >> bien. >> asÍ bien ¿a secas? >> pos bueno, estaba feliz porque va hacer papÁ. >> ah, bueno, pero ¿quÉ tan feliz, hombre? >> pues estaba muy feliz por lo del bebÉ.

and the president is set to meet with the titans of academia any moment now. and mike, i might have minute, t trip from the drive to the west wing. they will take the stage, there will be 1200 colleges and universities represented there in that auditorium, along with 40 other stakeholders there. whether they be college admissions boards and sat and down the line. what the president and the first lady are going to try to address, not only the skyrocketing cost of college, but it's not just the sticker price. anyone who shops for colleges with someone they know, there are financial breaks, credits, tuition assistance available to many lower income students. and still, the price tag can be daunting. but what they're going to try to address, trying to get lower income students on the right track. in other words, identify early students who have potential in college it get them into the right schools, to college to partner with some of the institutions you see there. the larger is what the president is talking about during the course of his administration in the la

>> i think the worst in academia as a binary word.s an educational need that goes across the entire population in many different ways. the need for critical thinking and a broad set of mind and a vocational needs to have skills that are necessary to execute the job. i think what he so nicely pronounces as a change of the skills gap effect in the nation. when my great grandparents lived and things didn't move that fast. the world is on fire and moving extremely fast. my education expires after five to 10 years. everything is new. the qadisiyah. facebook is new. twitter is new. historically, what we've done is spliced human life into basically four slices. one is the first five years and then the next 20 years. it kind of resting phase afterwards. what i think we should be doing this at the mall at the same time. we should play, learn, work at the same time because the world moves so fast today we can afford having a single education anymore. we really have to stay up to date. we point out it's not just the new kids on the block. engine

of forcing from academia, i think there is an education manythat goes across in different ways.here is an educational need for then al thinking and vocational need for people to have skills that are necessary tomorrow morning to rescue your job. i think what the governor so nicely pronounced is that a change of the skills gap affects the nation. when my great grandparents lived , things did not move fast. thanks to the tech crunch, the world is on fire and things are moving extremely fast. after fiven expires or 10 years. then everything is new. the cloud is new and facebook is new and google is new. in languages. historically, we sliced human life into five slices. the first five years and then a learning phase and then the work phase and a resting phase. doing think we should be is have them all at the same time. we should play and work and rest at the same time. it moves so fast today, we cannot up -- we need to stay up- to-date. we work with at&t. at&t was the first one to work out the what we do not just benefit the new kids on the block. and the workforce. they havegineers

this can also weave its way into academia. academia of course -- if you want to get in here to break, open new archives and write creatively. but if the fate of your dissertation research or the fate of your book depends on getting that rare visa, then you have to watch very carefully what you would say. it ultimately creates quite a problem. likewise, in talking to many participants in practicing dialogue, one of the most interesting dialogues can happen with north korea. certainly there's any number of former officials or well-meaning conflict resolution who will meet in germany or elsewhere with north korean officials, or with north korean track to participants. while they may be independent citizens free to say whatever they want without government instruction, does anyone really think that north koreans participating in those dialogues are free to simply improvise and discuss policy unofficially? what often happens is the north korean equivalent -- is in any of dialogue partners are just like them, pseudo-governmental, op

. >> acuerdo al estudio hecho a los libros por la academia mexicana de la lengua, varios de ellos sonr en 2018 cuando finalice la actual... federal. >> van a tener que los libros tienen errores ortogrÁficos seguramente no los van a repetir. >> son 255 millones de libros que se imprimoieron para el ciclo escolar 2013- 2014 los cuales tienen en las manos los estudiantes mexicanos. >> cuando tengamos concluido es este, esta investigaciÓn sancionar a los responsables, porque con todo honestidad el libro es un apoyo fundamental para que el niÑo aprenda y si no tuvimos libros adecuados para ello realmente la responsabilidad es mayÚscula. >> los niÑos se verÁn afectados en sus aprendizajes, sin embargo, no existe una sanciÓn severa que lleve a responsables a estar en prisiÓn. >> en la ciudad de mÉxico, univisiÓn. >> vamos con deportes decepcionante resultÓ el partido entre atlÉtico de madrid y barcelona que terminaron jugando a favor de real madrid. >> ahora lejaalejandro berry ti mÁs deportes. >> muchas gracias muy buenas noches saludos hasta el estudio, ha sido un sÁbado de mucho fÚtbol, l

a part of legal academia when i see the junior professors at harvard and yale naturally start blogging once they get hired. >> last question from this very patient gentleman over here. >> if well, much of the conversation has been about -- >> please tell us who you are. >> i'm chris tomlin, and i'm with the senate. but a lot of the conversation about the commerce clause, there was also some about kind of medicaid and the court's power on the states, but there was another issue that kind of came up, and actually it wasn't in the senate finance committee version. orrin hatch has raised the question of direct tax versus indirect tax. and, of course, roberts did address this somewhat in his decision, although i don't feel like it really takes it on that, you know, really well. but hatch's was based off of an article that was in tax notes which argued that it was a direct tax and had to be -- [inaudible] and so is, therefore, unconstitutional. did you guys look into that issue any more, and do you think maybe you should have raised that issue more with the court? maybe that would have been

we have invested huge amount of our findings to support academia of the polar research institute and their flaws of rizzo we have accumulated many discoveries in interactive allman and on genomics. and so so we have a strong our innovation bays and also out of the mosque. ten fifteen years. we also spend a lot of effort and resources to build the infrastructure fall at the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry for example goes on. when you just do the research in the academe and that is very different from carrying it all the way to cover some admission that she had to fight on any moment you have to do the pre clinical before you can try on humans so and then you' the clinical trial wh the regulatory issues. and so on so so they're a lot of info section need to be built and we had a reasonable good development in the section right now and most importantly i think god. we have access to greater china market that's that's very important. you can so that anna on how well it is built upon a bower of pseudo market min and then not been the abundant capital market is another important

and she spearheaded the research, and ahead of our foundation is also an demem -- academia, and they are rich in the field of analysis. they bring it together we'd have meetings and they conveyed what these things next and i said, "i don't understand what you are saying, say it again. this study says it's working this says it not. okay. we did that for two years, and it was just a big mess. >> you needed to apply a rigor to all yes. >> in the book, if you don't understand a research methodology or trials, you explain how it is done. you had to arrive at a way to give adequate weight to all the studies thesis. >> we won't accept every study. we had an academic standard. we an effect size. something that said if it made this much difference in a study, in the real world how much difference does it make. it makes that much difference when you apply it because of the affect. that is the affect size. a certain amount of studies ply, the rest can be dismissed. >> an important conclusion that you came to is that of the five things that you think work, that your studies found worked to impro

tends to favor i think blogging would establish part of the legal academia when i see virginia professors professors at harvard and stanford and yale naturally start blogging once they get hired and i think we are pretty far away from that. >> the last question to this very patient gentleman right over here. >> well, much of the conversation. >> please tell us who you are. [inaudible] a lot of the conversation about the commerce clause and medicaid and the course of power on the states, but there was another issue that kind of held up that actually was in the assignment assignment -- senate finance committee with orrin hatch on directx versus indirect tax and of course roberts did address is somewhere in his decision although i don't think it's -- really well but based off an article in tax notes which argued that it was a direct tax and was unconstitutional. have you guys looked in the tibet issue anymore and he think maybe should have raised that issue more with the court and maybe that would then -- roberts? >> a good question. in our briefs we did deal with the issue briefly because i

and academia has to me there was i know that to be an easy thousand fifteen hundred homes would be easy like i have friends that it might have been murdered thirty years and i see the amount of the some players are going to be in on like classic style the like i do really feel may not be like i really figured to i might be afraid to name my style name in there but i might be afraid the name i'm lost in the fray i just want to see if they became like jack it was a really nobody stand alone by really doing that and they're like man in my up to remember that night and like i did what happened and i'm like man no everybody can feel like. they had a gun shop it was on the borderline of like new orleans and jefferson parish called elliot's and it was just so and so. you get can just this was no paradise a lot of hunting going only it is normal and then in the wheezy the last station you must be twenty want to buy a hand but you can buy a hunting rifle at the age of eighteen assault rifle falls into the hung rival category so if you have look class s k s s k one hundred eighty nine it's no use

through one week of training led by professionals from the two national brands the sins and heals academia and other relevant fields through their participation in this program and in mali united nations. students have learned about the united nations and its work in sustainable development in achieving the end of poverty wasted time called hunger and poverty was the most debated topic. the students agreed that extreme hunger and poverty. x wants access to education health and protection bill is adopted resolutions that would provide school loans to individuals living in poverty in order to help them become economically self sufficient as well as this was too distracted initiatives to buy the less developed countries with strategies to implement their own homegrown school feeding program. it is an epidemic of mexico and education in primary school is very good to see if i'm not that i learned that i'll pick in the car yet it's so bad that other developing countries. the students said they were able to gain a greater understanding of how the glen works of the challenges will be your space w

he realized in order to marry ellen he would have to make a living and chose academ academia. he felt he had no chance not having money he could get ahead in politics. so he began to support his family by becoming a college professor at brin mar college the day they opened the school. he was in the first cohort of professors with they opened to door the just women. he wasn't happy teaching just women. and even unhappier was mrs. wilson. she thought they were not worthy of her husband. so a few years later he got another gig teaching history and political science at wesley college. and after another few year he got the call he was hoping for and that was a job offer from princeton. he returned to the school where he took the school by storm. rather as he had ad an undergraduate but he was the most dynamic presence on the campus and in the small town and increasingly in the state of new jersey. he becomes a public thinking, an intellectu intellectual, he writes books and lectures and he is travelling all over the country. he is becoming a famous thinker in the country. that is s

plagiarism is very common academia and china are numerous academic journal i kept read write research papers the norwegian press that price depending on the workout. but that's mostly for professors to want to keep her job. students who want to get into college i found out that cheating on the national debt to help them too. dr lucrative business. there's so much weight given to the exam scores. earlier this month one point seven million tiny didn't attend the postgraduate school entrance exam. the harbin university applied to technology. when the school examination room. many high ranking ministers at the university for free. i did for cooperation with professional teachers. enable the company of heaven and to think of them in their exam easy peasy it under the old media revealed nearly one hour after the exam started the review which a nearby school. the red began question and answers. i've investigated by fuji tv hundreds of students were involved in this team team in harbin. two related companies that provide the changes that were closed after this report the two companies were la

and two winners in the nonfiction category was to be secured at the institute of technology of the academia seneca yourself on your travel into an ounce and the thomas prefecture in sichuan province of tying up to documented disgusted truck and eight issues in the village is falling the award ceremony of the ten teams national exhibition prize. the event organizer also announced that he can your week's edition would take place from that very fit to have a tent at the taipei world trade center exhibition hall is one in three exhibition will also feature a postcard exhibition showcases three hundred precious postcards from taiwan and mainland china. e mail last year the ultra marathon their tummy ten completed his goal of competing in a ultra marathons on seven continents in five years. maliki has released a book detailing his experiences. and as for the future of tennis at his lifelong tactic is to complete the four test series by the time he's thirty five he knew pop culture marathoner time ten shares his experiences as many anecdotes from the three things. last year after completing its go

honestly abdomen again the assumption that as a family split this post is kinda fun uncle known in academia. my mother purchased on a cobbled lane to zion knowing the christening get to see into the kazakhstan the shiny she did it but didn't get to that and did a good thing unless something the locals. the couple was about losing jobs to low cost rivals. joe mckay people see it to the town was awesome damsel choo choo will begin be good at putting a lot less cluttered up in ottawa the monkey basic tools of saddam's article eight was the applesauce milk is the one to pitching in. so now i'm comin to my step count i had denied been on a lake of fire is now much to come back to back in the last time we stood there just in tanzania tunnel and it's nice to wake up but you couldn't get the look may be steeped in sin he should be species can see them he looked at this computer speed. and sometimes dancing. emotions recently. each game. you can cheat stg. i know. all of us so in other passages in receipts to bullets australian bayonne be good to put it in the bottom of the will of you who love him

incapacidad despuÉs de reportar una herida en el cuello y stress posttraumÁtico y luego abriÓ una academiala lucha contra este mal continÚa. el estudio de la sociedad americana del cÁncer pronostica 1.700.000 nuevos casos para este aÑo. incluidas 586.000 muertes. indica tambiÉn que el cÁncer se es el de la segunda causa de muerte en el paÍs tan sÓlo detrÁs de las enfermedades del corazÓn. la oficina del condado de los angeles de uno de sus peores momentos con mÚltiples acusaciones y demandas millonarias por abuso policial. hoy el lÍder de esta organizaciÓn dijo que abandonó su cargo a finales de este mes. tenemos las razones que compartiÓ el polÉmico sheriff para justificar su retiro. >> en medio de una verdadera crisis administrativa, el jefe del alguacil del condado mÁs grande del paÍs anunciÓ que se retire del cargo al que fue electo hace 15 aÑos. >> el veterano alguacil de origen hispano anunciÓ que no buscarÁ su reelecciÓn y fijó el Último dÍa de enero, la fecha de su retiro. >> una sorpresa completa. nosotros pedimos que Él renunciara hace casi dos aÑos y medio. Él hasta ayer, dijo q

how did this episode and the role of the conspiracy affect legal academia in the sense that it used to be a pure blogging, not only was that useless waste of time, but it would count against you that you're not a serious academic. now obviously all of you who are academics on the blog are very successful. is this an anomaly? is it now becoming if you want to be at the highest superstar reached, at least for a certain generation, under 40, whatever the case may be, that you do have to make an attempt to join one of these group loads and side effect in the debate both in the public engages reading your blog and things like this. what kind of effect does this book, the highest example, this sort of thing, changed the way law professors and intellectuals? >> so i think there's been a change ring on this for some time in that early on, a lot of people said maybe it's not good idea to blog and say we're not serious about your academic work if you're spending your time blogging. why is any work to spend your free time blogging than going out fishing. when you're blogging, people can see you'r

>> pos, vengo de hacer los exÁmenes de la academia de policÍa. >> ¡lupita, estÁ temblando!

really about how to help young people going though school who are not motivated by academics and by academiaand by studying, which -- come on -- most of us are not, are we, really? >> [ chuckles ] >> so, it was trying to work out, "so, where your passion? what@s it you might like to do?" and so, it explores young people's interests, not just in sport or physical activity, but also getting them to get involve in skills, to get involved in volunteering -- helping others hess fortunate than themselves -- and also doing an adventurous journey -- an expedition taking them way outside their comfort zone. and hopefully, one of those areas, you're going to [snaps fingers] connect with something or open up something which you had no idea that you were interested in. >> the idea behind the award is to make a difference. please elaborate on that. (a>> well, i think like every program, it's "maka difference." for us, actually, what we're about really is about equipping young people for life, and life is full of challenges, and it's also full of opportunities, but if you haven't learned how to seize thos

also maybe academia. taught at harvard business school. >> we will keep an eye on that. that could make for an interesting time as they go to unwind $3 trillion worth of a balance sheet. as the business leaders gather, hours away there is another meeting taking place. you have the world leaders gathering to discuss the political and to the civil war in syria. assad andbashir al- opposition groups as well as 40 other countries are sitting down for talks. john has been following this story. a lot of it is ceremonial, but it is very much trying to bring these groups. >> there is a serious tone. 100,000 lives have been lost. there are too many people displaced out of syria. sohave seen refugee camps large one is unofficially the fifth-largest city. these talks fueled with allegations of war crimes by the assad regime, but also what really stands out, out of the 40 countries it is who is not there. iran is not there, a country that has provided aid. william hague said the u.n. was right to rescind that invitation. a said there should be traditional government formed. >> what

obviously, the left was and still remains a mostly in control of academia.s, the there were fewer organizations that were dedicated to providing ideas and intellectual insight. was theright there chamber itself. there was the american enterprise institute that was founded in 1943 but very few others. well argued strongly that they need more on the right. moranda had aner rand instant and galvanizing effect on the conservative movement in the united states. among many other things, the conservative infrastructure began to build institutions they thought they needed to counter the very threat that powell was talking about in the memorandum. it included the correction of a nk, citizensng ta for a sound economy and a bunch of others. the most important squall of the memorandum went on to become one of the most important voices in washington and in the policy debate, the heritage foundation. or a talk on policy and advocacy and the importance of think wordsdespite the kind about the third way, you really have to start with the heritage foundation. this is how the

android, you should really take a look at wearable computing technology we've been working on in academia me about your encounter with this. >> when you wear something like this and you have a shoulder bag, a big computer -- remember those old cell phones were about two pounds and you had a motorcycle battery to power it all? also have a third revision of this wireless keyboard. headset,earing this this keyboard, a device over your shoulder and you are taking notes and conversation, people, to you and say, what are you wearing and why? i was at a little conference for ibm. i was just waiting at the coffee andy steven stanford students walked up to me and said, hello. my name is larry and we would like to talk to you about your computer. can we get a demo? talked about wearable computing and they told me about this new service they were talking about called google for better web search. it was just grad students talking to each other at the time. it was clearfter the smartphone thing was really taking off and was going to be successful, i sent him an e-mail saying, why don't you take a loo

and my background is in journalism, not academia. i was working as foreign correspondent for many years, mostly in the middle east reporting of the ground in places like syria, libya, yemen. so i was used to covering foreign affairs of the street level. went through a time several years back where i really wanted to take a step back and look at some of the frameworks of american foreign policy, some of the traditions. and so i started reading. as started studying from the early days of the republic through post-world war two empire building. and i discovered the diplomatic history is surprisingly small an academic field of seven former pakistan a ambassador say, you know, americans of the only was it when they say that is history, they mean that is irrelevant. he had a point. there is some truth to that. when i guess that i felt like studying el americans acted historically in international affairs would lead to a deeper understanding of the way we act now. so i kind of stumbled across this time, but i was sucked in right away first

obamacare litigation, but how did this episode and the role of all conspiracy in it affect legal academia in the sense that, i mean, it used to be that if you were blogging, not only was that a useless, waste of time, but it counted existence you, you're not a serious academic doing this. all of you are very successful. is this an anomaly? is this kind of now becoming part of, if you want to be at the, you know, highest superstar reaches, at least, you know, for a certain generation, you know, under 50 or something like that, under 40, whatever the case may be, that you do have to make an attempt to join one of these group blogs and, you know, somehow start affecting the debate both in the public and, you know, judges reading your blog and, you know, things like this? what kind of effect does this book, i guess, the highest example of it in this sort of thing change the way that law professors and, you know, the intellectual debate works? >> so i think there's been a change brewing on this for some time in that early on a lot of people said, especially early this my career, well, maybe it

public to both identify and also in some case overlooked the comforts of interest that arise in academia to certain extent i'm not sure those are that easily separable. we are all making careers out of having views and doing research on very subtopic scum and we all essentially advocate for the topics and we think are interesting. >> i think there's a chatter in academia where people are partly funded by companies in a way that i think is very intertwined that i'm uncomfortable with. but the other difficulty, some of you are seeing right here, these two things because -- there's a spectrum of kinds of carbon capture from the kind we're doing and i would say that a given clive roughly agreed, made him a network but it doesn't present hard governance challenges. it's very easy to quantify whether it will work or not work. it's the kind of thing that regulators are used to regulating. but because it's hard to explain all of that in a sure thing can you do this, where clive with these talking about solar engineering and then talk about all the oil industry money and the patents and some on,

florence and moved to florence where she became an extremely highly regarded artist, admitted to the academia a very exclusive group and -- >> the first woman admitted. >> the first woman. she paints in england later in her career for king charles i. and she produces throughout her career, as i said, these pictures in which she inserts herself, very often she's jude i get, with jude i get slaying. she can be a magdaline. at the she can be an amazon. rather like cindy sherman today. >> inserting herself into the work. >> into the work. and she's a sort of iconic figure she stood up for herself as a woman at a time when in the early 17th century rome it was extremely difficult to do. she did that. if you like a contemporary as well. >> did she learn from her? cause her father was able to connect her obviously with the leading artists of the time. >> she was part of a group of artists who were very, very influenced. of course her chief influence was her father and we see this in the beautiful handling of the modeling of the flesh tones, both of the hands and the face. very similar to the way her

a very significant insights into where various different theories were coming up and the like in academia. i mean i obviously have had an awful lot of education and i did actually teach school for a while but i was essentially a private economist in my early years for a long period of time. there were a lot of theories that have been developed and they never had time to watch them which i never really followed very closely and i didn't quite understand them. i used to go to janet and asked her come explain this to me. she was terribly helpful. i can imagine it would be otherwise, but she is going to have a very tough set of problems and i think she knows it going forward. >> and what about the fact is she would be the first woman? is that important? >> i made a public statement that its extraordinary and wonderful to have a woman finally in that particular job which has been an all-male line going back as far as you can go back to 1913, 14. but, that to me is -- [inaudible] my wife certainly would agree with that. [laughter] >> we are here at the national press club so give us your assess

i don't see how he doesn't fit on this list even though he's from academia and not a business leader,don't think rock stars have any business on this list. >> rock stars, ail guards and shakes. as far as the leaders and rebels like that. i think jobs and bezos. they're not two men that define business as we know it in the last 20 years, like those guys. >> i thought robert evans. youngest studio head of any studio, paramount pictures, of course, brought out "godfather," "china town," "love story." that guy defines rebels and icons. by the way, fabulous book, "the kid stays in the picture." if you want to read something fabulous about hollywood, that's it. >> 1987, aig created financial products. and they printed money for a long time. the group collectively, joe cassano, should be on this list. say what you want. they changed the way finance was done, for better for a while. and obviously, for a lot worse. >> we should know -- first, check out the list. one of the contenders on that list will be on "squawk box" tomorrow. jamie dimon than that starts at 6:00 a.m. eastern time tomorrow.

well, actually, i do, because academia's full of people like that. but he can use whatever words he wants, i explain myself, and he can explain himself. >> host: janis is calling from smithfield, utah. hi, janis. >> caller: hi. first of all, mr. levin, i am a great admirer of yours. i think you're a national treasure. so don't let the kooks get you down. >> host: janis, why do you think he's a national treasure? >> caller: i think he's got so many things right and so many -- he's got a wonderful mind. [laughter] i just admire his wonderful mind. but there was one thing i wanted to ask him, and that is as a conservative i'm, i've been concerned about the division among conservatives not over goals, but over tactics. it seems to be kind of creating a fission that i think's going to be very detrimental in the success of the goals we all want to achieve such as, you know, abolishing obamacare and stuff like that. because we argue amongst ourselves over the tactics of how to get there, and i wondered if you felt like that was a real concern or what your a

almost all donations to academia are tax deductible, including to football. so you look at ohio state. we want donations to the academic mission of ohio state or any college to be tax detective you believe. the rationale being it serves the larger purposes of society. if you -- but if i give $70 million to ohio state football program that money is also tax detective and you believe football is fabulous -- deductible, football is fabulous but it does not serve any higher purpose for society. host: how is it that the football coach makes millionings and the president makes half a million? guest: not only the coaches but the assistant coaches. there are 30 or 40 assistant coaches at the college level who make more than the president or any faculty members, including those of the medical school. i think the answer is the same reason roger goodell pays himself $30 million because he can. colleges pay huge amounts to their coaches because they can. the money is rolling in. they want to spend it on themselves not on the academic divisions. currently at ohio state, t

i don't get a sense that his chain and i think that academia in general but even harvard law school is inhospitable to jewish students were a lot of jews now, fewer numbers and a lot of these places. if you want to advocate against gay marriage, for example, you're a racist but everything you get labeled, put as an outcast. that was true then and i think it's worse to spin it it's bettr in some ways, worse than others. today of course there are many articulate and brilliant conservatives who are prepared to speak out. when i first started teaching, those views were not expressed. i had to play the devil's advocate. although i'm a lifelong opponent to the death don't come in my class i make the case for the death penalty if nobody else will. i make the case for positions i don't believe in because somebody has to make that argument. i think the position of conservatives have strengthened at harvard law school with federal society and other groups like that. on the issue of juice i don't think it's hard to be a jew and universities today. at you for strong supports israel. if you are lab

i don't get the sense that's changed, and i think now academia in general but even harvard law school is even inhospitable to jewish students where a lot of jew students are fewer in these places. you're considered a zionist, if you're a conservative, you're a racist. if you want to advocate against gay marriage be, for example, you're a racist. everything immediately you get labeled, and you get put an outcast. that was true then, i think it's worse now -- >> well, it's better in some ways, worse in others today, of course, there are many articulate and brilliant conservatives who are prepared to speak out. when i first started teaching, those views weren't expressed. so i had to play the devil's advocate. in my class, i make the case for the death penalty because nobody else will even though i'm a lifelong proponent. somebody has to make that argument. so i think the position of conservatives is actually strengthened at harvard law school with the federalist society and other groups like that. on the issue of jews, i don't think it's hard to be a jew at universities today, it's hard

space, need to reach out to industry, reach out to the consumer electronics sector, reach up to academia, because there are a lot of players in this space, and all of us have a piece of the equation, and it needs to be more collaborative. it is not like the old days where we were often our separate corners and then we came out fighting. i mean, what must happen is that we work together to achieve the best solution for everyone concerned, industry, government, and ultimately the consumer. >> i would like to echo what andrew decide about david. he was incredibly accessible, and is, -- this is not his obituary here. he is a thoughtful guy and a love of technology that came through his work. david, when he spoke, said the problem of connectivity, and i would quibble with that a little bit. i think the issue here is the opportunity of connectivity. we have this dawn of great new agent safety that connectivity is going to usher in, and the question is -- is the pace of change consistent with the nature of government in the modern world? i think the answer is, unfortunately, maybe not. the proc

institution and in the academic world can mutually madeit each other, and we use of the ideas we got from academiaat came from our own experiments. the basic problem was that short-term interest rates was affectionately -- effectively zero. any analysis would suggest that economic monetary support to achieve a sufficiently robust recovery. we needed additional stimulus. these were the two methods that we came to. think they both have been helpful and we learned a lot. i would disagree these are completely novel ideas. a number of different central banks have included different forms and reserve talk before the crisis about considerable time and those kinds of things as well. what we were doing is trying to build on what others had already done. >> qe was much more controversial than the lender of last resort things you did. you had to deal with a fair number of skeptics. you persuade so many people to go along with it? >> i am not sure i would agree with you on which one was more controversial. they both had elements of controversy. we were looking for additional measures we could take to nation a

think tank endowed by andrew carnegie in 1910, and they bring in foreign policy specialists from academia, from the foreign policy community, some journalists who have been foreign correspondents, and it's like a faculty without students, who write and think and lecture and talk among themselves about things that are happening in the world. c-span: and what did you do right after the carnegie experience? >> guest: then i joined the los angeles times. c-span: and why did you do that? >> guest: well, i guess a journalist always has this divided feeling. i'm in my 40s now and i want to do serious things, but yet you don't want to give up the opportunity to get out there and see what's going on in the world. you can't give them up can't give it up completely. so i when i wrote the first book -- i taught at duke university and did a pointer fellowship at yale to give myself some of the media credentials, but you still there's something addictive about journalism. c-span: in all this time, did you ever get a sense that you want to be on the other side of the line and be in the government? >> gu

>> liberals in the media, academia or hollywood have a compulsion for uniformity., but that is only if you described to their belief systems. finding out the hard way. here's a woman who got drummed out of appearing in of all things the spanish-language version of the monologues supporting republican for california governor. the quote by the producer of the spanish-language, had to bring it here and it shows yo what yoe up against. we are in the middle of the mission doing what she is doing is against what we believe. so being a conservative is the belief. stuart: i will just question of hollywood is in fact in lockstep behind for president obama. this week fox news visited the sundance film festival and spoke to a variety of celebrities on their way in to see the movie and had a chance to talk politics with some hollywood celebrities. >> are disappointed in president obama? >> in all honesty disappointed in the statement of the century. he will go down as without a doubt having cleaned up jimmy carter being the worst president ever. >> shrinking them down in size,

will he go to the fed, maybe politics in egypt, perhaps academia.live with speculation about the next job for him. a couple guys stepping up as well. balls is iverson, mr. well known to our viewers of bloomberg europe. the new deputy cios. right, the other thing about andrew balls, his brother is ed balls, u.k. chancellor. yn has a stellar record as a fixed income investor. he was named by morningstar as the 2013 top on investor, fixed income investor for the year. absolutely stellar credentials. these two will be co-deputy chief investment officers. they will sit just underneath bill gross. he indicated he is not going anywhere. >> absolutely not. us fromeed joining berlin. what else is on our radar? the storm hitting new york and the east coast is expected to make commuting pretty treacherous. the snow has grounded thousands of flights and closed schools in boston and philadelphia. it has closed federal offices in washington. bill gatesounder says innovation in technology has the potential to solve global problems. the last of our key stories, ibm

i don't think it is surprising because they are ensconced in academia for so long where capitalism is has nothing to do with capitalism, a mixture of big government cronyism but capitalism is indicted. i also think that many millennial sarge just lazy. they have a terrible work ethic, people who have been giving awards for self-esteem since they were children and reality smacks them upside the head and they realize we don't hand out trophies for everyone in the real world and they look for a scapegoat and the scapegoat is capitalism. stuart: we want to hear some change coming for millennial, we don't want the indictment of this generation, you got to get out there and do some work and turn these millennial around. that is your homework, okay? >> mission accepted. stuart: i used to be steward. >> i thought we were -- i can call you stuart varney. stuart: thank you very much, see you again soon. can we move on to j.c. penney? it says it is happy with holiday sales, investors are not. how about the stock? nicole: they're words to describe a pleasing performance over the holiday period. e