alan dershowitz, veteran attorney, former harvard law professor and author of "get trump. icularly damning, the tape of donald trump with the iran war plan either showing it to or at least brandishing it before a political aide and saying as president, i could have declassified this but now i can't. why is that crucial? >> because it's an admission on tape which can't be cross-examined about the fact that he knew at least one piece of evidence was not declassified, so it undercuts the claim that he declassified everything. so that's a strong piece of evidence. but it derives from, i think, an improper targeting of donald trump. so it is a mixed picture. howard: right. >> they targeted, that wasn't proper, but they got him. they came up with something from his own mouth. you know, there's a famous plaque of a fish, a stuffed fish and it says on the bottom if i had just kept my mouth shut, i'd still be swimming, and i think that's true of donald trump. all of his problems growing out of the indictment are from things he said both to this writer and then to his own lawyers. no

attorney general matthew whitaker and harvard law professor if i emeritus alan dershowitz. for being here. >> thank you. maria: alan, you are the author of the book "get trump," available now. your reaction to the doj getting trump. >> well, i predicted it. if you put aside all your resources and do what justice jackson warned about about 80 years ago where he said it's a question of picking the man and then searching the law books or putting investigators to work to pin some offense on, that's what they did. and jack smith is wrong when he said there's one set of laws. he was assigned only one job, to get trump. so here's the legal issue. let's assume, let's assume hypothetically that a democrat prosecutor announces in advance i'm only going to investigate republicans. and then the investigation produces some evidence of crime. is that acceptable in america? if the same investigation done against democrats or done against someone else would also have produced crimes. is it legal, is it justifiable? put it for a moment in the context of race in the south. what if a southern

thanks very much, alan dershowitz joining us this morning. we'll see you soon, alan. thanks.uick break and then president biden's approval rat ratings neg the lowest level in his presidency. he's still bragging about his so-called accomplishments. wait until you hear the latest one. back in a minute. the chase ink business premier card is made for people like sam who make...? ...everyday products... ...designed smarter. like a smart coffee grinder - that orders fresh beans for you. oh, genius! for more breakthroughs like that... ...i need a breakthrough card... like ours! with 2.5% cash back on purchases of $5,000 or more... plus unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases! and with greater spending potential, sam can keep making smart ideas... ...a brilliant reality! the ink business premier card from chase for business. make more of what's yours. chevy silverado factory-lifted trucks. where will they take you? with the capability of a 2-inch lift. ♪ the versatility of the available multi-flex tailgate. ♪ and the connection of a 13.4” diagonal touchscreen. chevy silverado.

alan dershowitz, thank you, greg. oppoay k you. now, by the way, now to some shocking news last night. let's seco intellicommune, const of all theorists, rachel maddow said something true on our show. take pause and note. >> you have to wonder if the justice department is consideringg true o whether e is some political solution to this criminal problem, whether part of the issue here is not just that trump has committed crimes, but that trump has committed crimes crd plans on back in the white house. do they consider as part oiminal a potential plea offer something that would prescribe e him from from white from running for office again? i don't know. again?n't knowi would imagine g like that happened, that it would have to come fromwould the defense side of the negotiation that o come f they thaty the trump team would would say, oh, by the way, and with we will also, you know, drop out of the the race president. otherwise it would put the justice department in this position that donaldt donald trump claims there and he claims they

thank you, alan dershowitz, thank you. here with more trump attorney tacopina. >> we're talking a lot about unequal justice under the law, lack of equal justice, equal application. if these cases are are not related in so they are related in so many different ways. nobody wants to talk about it, though, joe. nobody in the media wants to admit it. they don't even want to acknowledge that they lied to the american people with conspiracy theories for three years and got away with it. >> it's all like, oh, okay. >> we'll move on to the next thing. it's it's missing from what you just did there, that that little monologue and that that series of clips you put together was so powerful. so powerful. opening statement as to why there at least should be parallel investigations. i mean, they're spending all this time of dollars, hundreds of prosecutors investigating, donald trump, anything. >> donald trump, you know, find a target and then go seek the crime. not the way it's supposed to be in this country. you have apparently real e

and coming up tonight we will have full legal analysis from alan dershowitz, former acting attorney general matt whitaker and the former speaker of the house newt gingrich the house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan and my preview of my exclusive interview with the california governor gavin newsom coming up friday night but we begin with a statement that you hear a lot from the left. nobody is above the law. they say there is one set of rules for every american in fact the doj special counsel, jack smith who is prosecuting donald trump emphasize this with a press conference today unfortunately i am not buying it i will explain in a minute but take a look. >> have the fbi view the incident in which hillary clinton instructed jake sullivan to take the markings off of a document that was to be sent to her? >> we looked at that pretty closely. there was a problem with the secure fax machine and email which she says in substance, take the headers off of it and send it as a non-paper. >> we have one set of laws in this country and they apply to everyone. >> there are hundreds of classified

harvard law professor alan dershowitz. matt, let me start with you. a cataclysmic event for joe biden? explain. >> this is a game changer. right now we have only seen the smoke. there is a lot of folks that believe joe biden and his entire family have profited immensely from the public service. this would be concrete evidence that would point to actual brya berry, actual payments from foreign governments to affect u.s. policy. that to me is an absolute game changer, sean. >> let me ask you professor dershowitz, you had said that the republicans probably now have every right and obligation open on impeachment hearing about this. now we know the fbi director has not been cooperating with james calmer's committee. we know now that he selectively redacted information that was pertinent and key especially mentioning the possibility that there are 17 tapes held by a barisma executive, 15 with hunter, two would joe biden, as an insurance policy should something go wrong. i don't think he would hold onto tapes unless they were incriminating, do you? >> of cou

>> all right, greg allen and alan dershowitz. thank you both. we check in with house oversight committee chairman james comer. the fbi director is now allowing his entire committee to few a document that includes allegations that president biden was involved in a bribery scheme with a foreign government. we now go to fox news correspondent kevin corke first. >> reporter: apparently we have james comer first. anyway, congressman calmer, thank you. let's talk about specifically you were just about to as of today or yesterday bring the director into contempt of congress. it became unnecessary because he finally gave in to your demand. my understanding is that this particular source that you cited in your original letter along with charles grassley is viewed as a very credible source. the allegation seems reel. they've had it since 2017. it deals specifically with the country ukraine and it talks about specific actions that joe biden might have taken in exchange for a lot of money. what specifically can you tell us? >> i can tell you that the fbi ha

big show tonight, tomi lahren, jimmy fallonbi clay, travis,, cy andre jarret, alan dershowitz, and a specia, gregl report on the ocean gate submarine tragically implodert on thd in the north atlantic, killing all five passengers aboard. also tonight, congresswoman lauren boebert will join us. >> shelart wil today introduceda articles of impeachment against joe biden. rticleyour president, and appary is in this battle with marjorie taylor greene. maybe i can be the peacemaker because they will inherit the eart h. we'll see. now we'll also hear from house ways and means cmi chairman jason smith. earlier today, his committee released bombshell testimony from not one but two irs whistleblower. now, based on their serious allegations. get this payons, get close atte. it appears the department of justice, she thought it was corrupt, even more corrupt. thi this is a corrupt organization. they wennizationt to great lengs to protect joe and hunter biden from eved r facing criminalchar charges. despite what is a mountain ogesf damning evidence, according to these whistleblowers, the irs recomm

maria: well, i spoke with harvard law professor alan deer dershowitz yesterday on sunday morning futuresent but it's the product of targeting and the question is can you prosecute somebody when you targeted that person and went through every hoop, dotted every i, crossed every t, gave lawyers immunity, violated the lawyer/client privilege in many respect and then came up with something, i don't know how the courts will look at that and trump's lucky, he got the case tried in palm beach county where he might get a more sympathetic jury and he got a good judge. maria: joining me is north carolina congressman, member of the house veterans affairs and house ways and means committee, greg murphy is here. it's good to see you. thanks very much for being here. what is your reaction to the trump indictment? >> i think it's a very troubling time for our country, maria. you know, alan dershowitz and even former attorney general barr said there are troubling things in these indictments. that said, where was the persecution of bill clinton when he perjuried himself, where was the persecution of hill

i will go with alan dershowitz saying this does not meet the conviction criteria. he feels it is a very weak case. i am going to use the word vendetta by the democratic party, and it has twisted -- this whole thing was a law created to go after trump individually because he has been president and has access to everything, and to take that away from him and make it a crime is just pure politics. it is disgusting to see our system twisted like this. thank you for your information. i will not agree with all of it, but it certainly gives us a better outlook. c-span, thank you very much. host: tom in los angeles. mr. weinstein. guest: tom, look, we are all part of the system. that is what is the beauty of our system and country. we are entitled to have opposing viewpoints, and we are entitled to disagree about what the law is in the application of the law, and that is why we have judges. that is why they review the facts, they compare what is on the books, read the statutes and look at the intent behind them when they are drafted by the legislature, and we can agree to

matthew whitaker with author of the trial of the central fox news legal analyst jarrett, and alan dershowitz. matt whitaker you have the background the inner workings of the department of justice. you explain to me. so if merrick garland testified under oath that weiss had all this authority and didn't need special counsel status because he had more authority and was denied on two separate occasions the ability to go after his investigation, that sounds to me like merrick garland not only was hoping to protect his boss, joe biden, but also lied under oath and that would be perjury, based on my understanding of the law. >> yeah, it would be sean. good to be with you tonight but i also know how the department of justice worked and merrick garland is being kept in the dark about a lot of this not communicating with u.s. attorneys in los angeles and district of columbia doing his dirty work plus the deputy attorney general has day to day oversight of those offices is trying to keep things out of garland's office and i would also not only bring those u.s. attorneys in front of congress after they

. >>> joining us now with more is author of get trump, alan dershowitz. a long with the author of another best seller, fox news legal analyst gregg jarrett. there is a lot to sink your teeth into here. i will let you take whatever side you want. it is time for this fbi director and this organization to be altered. they need a cleaning up from top to bottom. bottom to top. the same thing with the doj. it has been weaponize, politicized and this is not equal justice or application. >> clearly i am in the wrong profession. i drive '874 volkswagen. >> i will help you out with that. you can do better. >> corvette z06. get the z07 package. >> just numbers and letters to me. this makes a mockery of our system of justice. unequal, equal justice under the law. it has been blown to shreds. i agree with you. merrick garland, i think lied to congress. he should resign in disgrace. i will give you one example. he said david weiss the u.s. attorney in delaware has complete jurisdiction to do anything he wants. he knows that is not true. he was a federal judge. maybe he

even if donald trump is convicted he can still run for office, but constitutional lawyer expert alan dershowitz what? the feds better have a strong case. take a listen. >> if this indictment is as weak as it appears to be from what has been disclosed so far, it may be the most dangerous indictment in political history. ashley: well, there you have it. now, donald trump is set to appear tuesday afternoon in a federal court house in miami, but it is a federal case so it will be behind closed doors, no cameras like the spectacle we saw during his manhattan appearance. it's unlike lip this case be resolved before this election that manhattan case is still to be decided and if trump does win the election, david, consider this. the whole thing goes away because he takes back control of the justice department. back to you. david: he can pardon himself, ashley, thank you very much. lina hobba, one of donald trump 's attorneys joins me. thank you for coming. this is all happening by the way the same week we're getting details of the alleged biden bribe. do you think that's just a coincidence? >> i don't

do you think the comments from a bill barr or alan dershowitz who was writing in an op ed about how strongase is here, those could actually begin to have some sway or at least encourage people to read the indictment for themselves? >> well, i -- i am not myself that intimately familiar with the psychology of all of the trump supporters. it's really hard for me to believe that among his most loyal supporters, there are a number, there are 20, 25, 30% who can be appealed to by reason. the idea that -- it seems to me a lot of them were very supportive of bill barr precisely because bill barr did the worst things in the world in order to support donald trump. well, here's this person who did those things and who was practically the hero of the trump supporters for many, many months as attorney general, here he is standing up and condemning donald trump for the acts that were done here. hard for me to believe that there aren't some marginal number, i don't know, again, what the percentage is, but it will be significant if 10 or 15 or 20% of trump supporters are influenced by this. the. >> we ha

i spoke with harvard law professor emeritus alan dershowitz yesterday to get his reafntle watch. >> ient than the bragg indictment but it's the product of targeting and the question is, can you prosecute somebody when you targeted that person and went through every hoop, dotted every i, crossed every t, gave lawyers immunity, violated the lawyer/client privilege in many respects and came up with something. i don't know how the courts will look at that. trump's lucky he got the case tried in palm beach county where he might get a more sympathetic jury and a good judge. maria: joining us now, florida attorney general, ashley moody. good to see you. >> great to be with you. maria: your thoughts on the indictment of donald trump. >> it is a speaking indictment, meaning they did lay out their case a little more than normal in federal charging documents. generally those indictments track the statutes. i think that was a must here. you have an american public who is thinking what is good for the goose isn't good for the gander, that republicans are conservatives are being targeted by this ju

this is alan dershowitz wrote an opinion editorial in the wall street journal sea ago strong indictmentind of bipartisan support that forced nixon to resign. no such support is currently apparent since many republicans seem to be troubled by the targeting plaintiff trump. mr. smith, the special prosecutor, will have to convince not only a miami jury but the american public on both sides of the partisan divide. let's bring in our panel morgan ortagus spokesperson jeff mason reuters and ben domenech editor-at-large for the spectator, host of ben domenech podcast on fox news radio. ben, has been interesting since the digestion if you will of the federal indictment and the fallout from it, the former president has said a few things republicanly you heard his attorney general speak out on "fox news sunday." the political candidates running against the former president have in some ways evolved some of them in their messaging as the days have gone on. how do you see it. >> well, i think that this is a case that should not have been brought, in the first place. i don't think that it is justifi

. >> alan dershowitz even over the weekend. >> and a trump-appointed judge. >> so the whole world isn'ttacked against him. it's about his actions. >> stay with us. there is a lot are more to get into. as the former president prepares to surrender in miami we will speak to one of his staunchest supporters on capitol hill, byron donald of florida. >>> pete buttigieg is set to visit the site of that fiery truck crash that made part of i-95 collapse in philadelphia. we will have the latest details on that ahead. stay with us. for people who are a little intense about hydration. neutrogena® hydro boost lightweight. clically proven. 48-hour hydration. for people with skin. . (wheezing) asthma isn't pretty. it's the moment when you realize that a good day... is about to become a bad one. but then, i remembered that the world is so much bigger than that, with trelegy. because one dose a day helps keep my asthma symptoms under control. and with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler, trelegy helps improve lung function so i can breathe easier for a full 24 hours. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sud

but legal scholars including alan dershowitz say the doj better have a strong case. >> look, this indictment is as weak as it appears to be from what has been disclosed so far, it may be the most dangerous indictment in political history. >> reporter: you know, donald trump is expected to appear in a miami federal courtroom tuesday afternoon. it's federal court, no -- the doors will be closed, no cameras. and, neil, it's unlikely this case will be resolved anytime before the general election. and as we've seen in the past, indictments and charges like this have done nothing else but so lid arefy donald trump's base, so it'll be interesting to see how all of this affects his lead, which he has a substantial lead in the gop primary. neil, back to you. neil: ashley, do you know whether jim trusty had a heads up? he was talking to the media this morning that that he was going to be dumped by afternoon? >> reporter: i know. i don't think he did. that's a very good question. will we ever know, but having watched him on the morning shows, it didn't appear to me that he was on his way out. and if he

alan dershowitz is an eminent american lawyer who defended donald trump in his first senate impeachmentis tape—recording is a huge problem for the legal team. it is a ni . htmare problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for— problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a _ problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a defence _ problem for the legal team. it is a nightmare for a defence lawyer i problem for the legal team. it is a l nightmare for a defence lawyer and the dream of a prosecutor to have his own words, the defence would be a difficult one, he would have to argue i'm donald trump, i'm pompous and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i wasjust and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i was just waving and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i wasjust waving papers and do not always tell the truth. i brag. i was just waving papers to show how important i am. with the jury show how important i am. with the jury believe that? i would not make that argument unless i believed it was true. i would have to see what the evidence looked like so i think that particu

simpson i have had some of the world's greatest lawyers and johnnie cochran and alan dershowitz, thisthe advice that i would give to donald trump that i got from my lawyers. don't talk about the case publicly. don't do interviews about the case. he said, quote: i don't know if donald's lawyers are stressing this to him. if not, they should be fired and he should sue them. so o.j. simpson saying donald trump has got to stop talking about the case because he will dig a hole for himself. >> ainsley: joe concha on "fox & friends first" made a gotd. good point so obvious it dawned on me. >> ainsley: other countries we see political opponents get thrown in prisoner because of something they have done in the past or just as a way of corrupt government a bee manna government. we have seen that in v ns and caracas. that is what is hang here, it seems. >> andy mccarthy said if half of this is true he is in real trouble. he also said jim jordan should demand as oversight committee an update on what is hang with joe biden. you can't sit there jack smith come out and say no one above the law equal

senas senator ted cruz, senator , one of the brightest, best debaters, according to alan dershowitz at harvard law. you're watching this case. s, a your observations, am i right?au about a dual justice system?la is this equal justice under app the law? tion oor equal application of? our laws? >> sean ?book you're absolutely right. as you know, the last bookupt. i wrote is entitled justice corrupted how the left has weaponized the legal system. and sadly, we're seeing it come to life in technicolor. the book justice corrupted talks about how the obama justice department and the fbi e and the irs were turned into political weapons to targetrner their enemies. you just talked about loist wa. lerner. that was part of that. it parthen talks about how those career, those those vicious partizans burrowed into senior career positions in waged war the agencies and the deep state agr against donalded t trump during the four years trump was president . ev tried to dock i everything they could to destroy his presidency. now, those partizans are back in the open. they are brazen.e they are runningd

but let's begin with harvard law professor alan dershowitz, o who wrote the book get trump and fox news legal analyst gregok g jarrett trial of the century author. well, they got him , it seems,, it professor. you knoweems, we don't have all the charges. we have four of the seven. i'd like to gewe have t the spey within the indictment, as i'm sure you would . this should be the strongest indictment, the strongest ever brought against either a former president or a potential presidential candidate since richard nixon. if candi this doesn't meet the r the richard nixon test. nixo, member richard nixonic you know, tried to destroy evidence. if this doesn't meet that test, that this is not the strongest case ever. y th then obviously, this will be seen by the public. democrats, republicans alike,ane as partisan justice designedputp to prevent the people from deciding who the next president shouldng be and giving that decision over to judges, juries and prosecutorsr to. that's a violation of the rule of law, violation of that. ed breaton so i wait with bated breath to see whether the indictm

i talked to alan dershowitz tonight. he said if if thishe court this was done inlled the court of law o, the lawyers would be in extreme danger. investigd on congress to investigate this. he said the american public bett much better fromhings congress than a fake piece of evidence. >> well, we knew thing gos were going to go amiss when they hired a tv producer to produce right there hearings . then they were? prime time events. but who's watching? right, john ? >> we'llheck ioothank you so mu we'll check in with you on the house oversight committee was gearinag up c to interview a major witness in the biden family corruption probe last month when suddenlysa the informant disappeared. day? where is tha t informant today? where are these whistlewhis blowers? well, unfortunately, we can't trac k down the informant. we're hopeful that the informant is still there. i knowotoing you got stuff goini you're trying to find,or you know, the fake informantmanw that now he's gone missing. tha. >> i know you're busyso with that. well

higthey seem to have, as alan dershowitz, as always, said, they'd get trump mentality. and but there are going to be challenges. now, there's something interesting inp ment the targetedrget notification, the law that they're citing for the classified documents in section seven nine three. it's a law that doesn't require you tot do prove that something is classified, just that it would have affected the national defense d iveinformation. that's going to give the president's lawyers a lot of latitude to argue, well, maybe that's notpresiden nationo defense information. and what if this information was leaked by someonion anwhaten before the president referenced it? i think there's a lot of challenges tha ret the trump teamin sees in the prosecution. and quite frankly, i've talked to government lawyer s. cas they have some concerns about how this case ends up. all right, john,e ends up. solk you for keeping us updated with quickly right now. >> te it the breaking report from boston .com tonight with morein damning evidence from joe against joe and hunter in a newly uncover

it that's why alan dershowitz sayss you were one of the best debater students he's ever had in his harvard law class. buer had it in all seriousness o they have done everything evty can do to obstrucne james comey's investigation into the biden family. familythis is a this is a witned that the fbi paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to in the past for intel. they'v e had this now for years. why have they sat on it? >> well, i believe because they're covering up. look , the fbi at that hearing dir yesterday, that deputy director i askedectoi aske dired they have did the 1023 allege ag that biden had received a personal bribe of $5 million? he refused to answer. i asked him, well, will the fbdh give the 1023 to the senate judiciary committee? he refusediciary to answer. i asked him, is it accurate that there are 17 voice recording of this burisma official 15 talking to hunter biden. two talking to joe biden. he refusedo he. answer i asked him, does the fbi have those 17 voiceto a recordings? he refused to answer. i askenswer.i asked him, will ti give to the senate judiciary committee those

big show tonight, tomi lahren, jimmy fallonbi clay, travis,, cy andre jarret, alan dershowitz, and aspecia, gregl report on the ocean gate submarine tragically implodert on thd in the north atlantic, killing all five passengers aboard. also tonight, congresswoman lauren boebert will join us. >> shelart wil today introduceda articles of impeachment against joe biden. rticle

harvard law professor law alan dershowitz. and professor, i mean, n ders you know, if thihos is true, ins other words, that thiscoming indictment is coming, i'm going to bet every dollar that i havee that this is notnt going to be n indictment about classified materialterial. because the imme comparisons will be about hillary clinton and the july 2016 press conference ofs d he jim comey. and he said no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute and she did have top secret classified information. we have no doubt classifie joe a it of four separate locations, as i recall, so they would make that comparison. so it seems to m ie that that won't be about classified ofcuments, which means that in e the process of investigatingn this, some process crime probably came upd they in theirt and they went forwardhe with that. that's my guess. you're a legal professor. >> i'm not. you're a great guesser. eight plus in my book, back leave that that they would not go after themthe on the possession classified material, but they would try to conco

i will go with alan dershowitz saying this does not meet the conviction criteria.feels it is a very weak case. i am going to use the word vendetta by the democratic party, and it has twisted -- this whole thing was a law created to go after trump individually because he has been president and has access to everything, and to take that away from him and make it a crime is just pure politics. it is disgusting to see our system twisted like this. thank you for your information. i will not agree with all of it, but it certainly gives us a better outlook. c-span, thank you very much. host: tom in los angeles. mr. weinstein. guest: tom, look, we are all part of the system. that is what is the beauty of our system and country. we are entitled to have opposing viewpoints, and we are entitled to disagree about what the law is in the application of the law, and that is why we have judges. that is why they review the facts, they compare what is on the books, read the statutes and look at the intent behind them when they are drafted by the legislature, and we can agree to disa

is a tough one because, you know, i have to reference my notes, but a friend of your program, alan dershowitznt . whatsoever about that incident. vet. — whatsoever about that incident. yet it— whatsoever about that incident. yet it toes— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel like there are ruies— yet. it does feel like there are ruies tor— yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain _ yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain people that otters— rules for certain people that otters tom-t— rules for certain people that others don't have to follow. in this— others don't have to follow. in this particular— others don't have to follow. in this particular case are mr trump-s— this particular case are mr trump's supporters angry about this e — trump's supporters angry about this e res.— trump's supporters angry about this ? yes, absolutely- trump's supporters angry about this ? “55 .5-g j5rr: this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said,— this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said, they- this? “55 .5-g j5rr: and li

is a tough one because, you know, i have to reference my notes, but a friend of your program, alan dershowitzver about that incident. vet. — whatsoever about that incident. yet it— whatsoever about that incident. yet it toes— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel— whatsoever about that incident. yet. it does feel like there are ruies— yet. it does feel like there are ruies tor— yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain _ yet. it does feel like there are rules for certain people that otters— rules for certain people that otters tom-t— rules for certain people that others don't have to follow. in this— others don't have to follow. in this particular— others don't have to follow. in this particular case are mr trump-s— this particular case are mr trump's supporters angry about this e — trump's supporters angry about this e res.— trump's supporters angry about this ? yes, absolutely- trump's supporters angry about this ? “55 .5-g j5rr: this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said,— this? yes, absolutely, dodi. and like you said, they- this? “55 .5-g j5rr: and like you said,