not everything, in order to publish, what were these 2 hours of conversation about, because alexander gelich, dugin it's not easy, there is a political scientist, a political strategist, even a political analyst this is a philosopher who conceptually scientifically substantiated another conservative, yes right, but different way of civilization development. he didn't just take the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long review interviews with him, he explained the school of political realism in the usa, the engineer's brush explained who these people were? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will politics develop further here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. there, it was not by chance that during this interview it was said that yes, we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has, uh, a clear concept of ideology the future, but the slogan that can pick up people to lead it is not there yet, belarus is interesting, it’s important, because in fact, for

during this interview it was said that yes , we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelichclear concept of the ideology of the future, but there is still no slogan that can pick up people to lead him, belarus is interesting and important, because we actually choose a different social one for the last quarter of a century, sometimes we will stipulate the socialist path development. and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation that we will lay under our state building, while it is largely groping due to the position of the president, by the way, this is an important point. look us and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko was told that the necessary dialogue does not exist in the form in which it would be enough to respond to the western ideology that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but what 's the difference? look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we see in the west, these new, let's say, globalist values ​​that break family values, which, well , even break common sense. and we

that during this interview that yes, we have not formulated an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich concept of the ideology of the future, but there is still no slogan that can pick up people to lead him along, belarus is interesting and important, since we are on in fact, for the last quarter of a century we have been choosing a different social, sometimes we will stipulate the socialist path of development. and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation to lay under our nation-building, as long as it is largely groped by position president, by the way, an important point. look at us and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko about this. they said that the necessary dialogue does not exist in the form in which it would be sufficient to respond to the western dialogue that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but what's the difference? look, they both say that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we see, probably in the west, these new, let's say, globalist values ​​that break family values ​​that, well, common sense

and here is alexander gelich, and in several interviews that i recorded with him. it, belarus is important. by the fact that it is trying to apply and work out a great theory, a beautiful harmonious theory, in practice, that is, belarus is trying to build a society of social justice, a society for developing its sovereignty in absolutely hostile conditions, it is trying in practice, which is very important to work out great philosophical ideas concepts. moreover, it is also important to understand what opposes us. here barrel let it slip. but this is really the theory of racism the theory of superiority, when it is declared from a high rostrum that the european union and the liberal world in general, is a flowering garden. and the rest of the jungle, that is, the thought of us, is perceived as monkeys from the jungle. this is repetition. uh, this absolutely russian nazi. uh, ideologies, white man supremacy, that 's uh, white's burden. yes, this is concentrated racism that lives in this liberal elite. and by the way, alexander is fighting against this racism, let's

if not everything, in order to publish what they were these 2 hours of conversation, because alexander gelich, dugin this is not easy, there is a political scientist, a political strategist, even a political analyst is a philosopher who conceptually and scientifically substantiated another conservative, yes right, but different way of civilization development. he did not take only the russian federation or only the republic of belarus, he came to belarus more than once. we did long survey interviews with him, he explained - he explained the school of political realism in the usa, he explained who these people were? what philosophical concepts do they stand on and how will it develop further in politics here as well. i think this is what the president of belarus was interested in. after all, it was not by chance that during this interview that yes, we have not formulated an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has a clear concept of the ideology of the future, but there is still no slogan that can pick up people to lead him along, belarus is interesting and important, since we are on

during this interview it was said that yes , we did not formulate an ideological slogan, that is, alexander gelich has, uh, a clear concept of the ideology of the future, but a slogan that can pick up there are no people to lead him yet, belarus is interesting and important, since we actually for the last quarter of a century, we have been choosing a different social, sometimes we say the socialist path of development, and we need a scientific justification. we need a foundation that we will lay under our state building, while it is largely groping due to the position of the president, by the way, this is an important point. look, we and alexandra dugin alexander lukashenko said that the necessary dialogue does not exist in the form in which it would be sufficient to respond to the western dialogue that has been formed and is being implemented every day. but in what difference look, they both talk about the fact that it needs to be taken from the people, that is, to create it from above, what we see in the west, these new globalist values, let's say, that break family values, that even break commo