this book "chef supreme" was conceived by martha ann alito. and she thought the perfect tribute would be a cookbook so this has some 30 odd of his well over 150 recipes that he had on a disk. the choices were initially made by martha ann but then my daughter looked at the table of contents and she said "mother, those are not the recipes daddy would have picked." [ laughter ] so i said all right, jane, you pick the recipes. and in the table of contents there's one recipe, it says "jane's cesar salad." she contributed one of her own. >> ruth, she's as good as her father, i understand. i had one meal at her home in new york and the food was fantastic. >> she's very good. >> the tributes to martin ginsburg in the cookbook by the spouses are wonderful and i'd like to just briefly read a snippet from kathy douglas stone who was the widow of william o. douglas. this is what she wrote about martin ginsburg. "he arrived dressed elegantly in a sports jacket with a handkerchief in his breast pocket." the spouse luncheon. "his smile gave the impression of

of the luis and we worked on some light houses from altoona, michigan, all the way down to almost alito, ohio. we were responsible for them. when the winter months came along, we would keep the shipping channels open as long as we could. what we did was we supported the navigation system that allowed commerce to work in the great lakes for as long as they possibly could. all of the commerce was depended on the navigation and the ability to navigate in those waters and in the summertime. it's a very demanding job. rake the day into 12 hour sections and a bad thing on the crew is as a ship is raking ice, it is very, very noisy. you can imagination designed to on the ice and fall down and break it. that makes a lot of noise. the crew is not getting good rest were good sleep. them up and sam going to go into the ice and i will see you when the sun comes up will start breaking ice and get you into altoona. >> here we are where the ship is split into two main berthing areas. there's one half and one forward. which we hadcrew in the 50's or 60's, we had up to 57 crew members and at that wise,

that is alito's question which is the hardest point for you to overcome and i want to hear your response. >> i actually agree that it's unclear. >> that's the end of it is that? >> it is the end of it. i think it's unclear but one other issue. >> in georgia if you have new facts or new evidence stevemack arrests giuda, goes out the window. >> been the court can look at the issue and go beyond. in this case once you have new facts or new evidence if the court in this case finds that they can review the evidence of a new in the new review has had been i think you are beyond that are. >> i don't believe what you just said. said again. >> okay. if the issue has been decided on direct appeal and you cannot go back to it and can't obviously overturn the states highest corporate branding have new evidence such in this case and it is strong evidence that the court feels that it has to go, tester look at that evidence in this case it did then i think you will be in the counter bar. >> i think that's how the decision was framed because the decision talk about race papayans. this is in a separate i

. >> but with justice alito question if there is real consent? >> the analysis of the consent. >> i am assuming there going to stop everybody so somebody with some from that particular state to has not signed anything is still subject to. >> that is my next question but talk about the state. >> the hand that is the reality but as i say that is not the analysis is in this case but the consent analysis in that is the state's obligation to show to permit the search that is truly voluntary. >> especially with north dakota you have to drive we go consent is fictional in that sense. >> is still surprises me that there is an argument with the lawyers. >> that is one of the key points is conversion -- coercion but that is something that is essential to daily life. >> that is grounded in the fourth amendment. >> and if we just postulate to said that the states could not take away that right. >> what i am saying is as justice kennedy hypothesize that people are told and are aware that they're told that there consenting to be searched. and to execute on tha

his family says he was in see alito park exercising and playing pokemon go when someone shot him up will multiple times. significance and gravity of the person that he did this to. >> whoever took smite -- my son's life away. i want justice to >>reporter: his mother says he was here exercising because he wanted to reenlist in the marines. his funeral is monday. if you have information about what happened july 26 call silent witness you could get a $1000 reward. >> if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do folks. the second amendment people may be there is. >> donald trump is under fire for that comment he made about hillary clinton at a rally in north carolina. there is outrage, many reading this is trump calling for the assassination of clinton if she gets elected. trump later said he was saying people who own guns should get the clinton campaign immediately responded saying, this is simple what trump is saying is dangerous a person seeking to be president should not suggest violence >>> valley police need you to look at this sketch of a serial killer and the vehicle associated

>> i don't believe we are making either of those arguments justice alito. the total population is not permissible to get the tracks voter population. at the same time while the court doesn't have to reach this question rep or station -- representational equalities it's our position that we could choose a reliable measure of the voting population without running afoul of the protection clauses guaranteed in invidious discrimination. >> it seems to me the two interests are not always the consistent. they cannot in great conflict. can have a situation where you want to equalize the population you may have a situation where you cause great inequality in the chances of voters affecting the outcome of the election. on the other hand if you choose eligible voters only then you may have a situation where every person within two districts does not have an equal representation in the legislature. i don't think you can just say well you serve both. what do you do when they come into conflict? >> i believed what this course and burns as you allow the states to choose t

lucas g alito got the start, gave up 4 runs in five innings. nats down 5-2.ryce harper lets out a little frustration last night. nats fall. the final for this 15-3. o's and yanks, top of the eighth. o's up 4-0. mark trumbo, he unloads on 1. to deep left center, and it's gone. his 40th of the year, he still leads the minor leagues. 5-0. quiet preseason for desean jackson. this is good, no pulled hamstrings or any. he had a good night friday. a 39 yard catch and run. as always, these things are expected. here's jay gruden on his rece he's definitely a playmaker, has great speed. excited to play, excited to practice and carry over to the game. makes a difference, that's for sure. >> is a very talented elite receiver in this league. i've always said we have to find ways to get the ball in his hands. right when prove us we throw the ball in his direction. we will continue to try to give him opportunities, i believe, and have great confidence he will continue to make plays happen. reporter: ravens weren't so lucky. benjamin watson suffered a season-ending injury sa

i mentioned sam alito. but her also merrick garland who learned his law in this city and he is the guy on the hot seat right now. so it's very much a new york story. and what's going to decide? what's going to decide the election is which -- who fills that slot on the supreme court, what's going to decide it is which man hot night becomes president of the united states, whether it's donald j. trump or basically hillary clinton. so it's very much a new york story and the supreme court is very much on the ballot. and when you have judges, for example, who decide -- who oust a president of the united states in effect, richard nixon, or pick a president of the united states, george w. bush, or basically tell us who can vote and who can't with id laws and all the rest, the court is influencing in important ways in close elections who is going to win and who is not. and so these things interact. very interesting interaction between the presidency and the court. so that was my first big thing. my others are shorte

. >> teeeight -- justice alito the gratitude of campaign contributions is not a crime as quid pro quo it is. >> that is why one under review. >> if i could just follow up , if a senator rights to a federal agency and says this union or this company is critical to the company of my state and by the way does not say this but the biggest contributors to his campaign what would not make that a crime? not beyond a reasonable doubt? the reason why he was urging this meeting was because the entity happen to be a of a big supporter? separating lawful from unlawful conduct ? >> this court has addressed that very issue in the

and justice alito, in his concurrence in jones, talked about this is really a realm for the legislatures because they can act quickly, they can use more information, they're not bound by stare decisis like the courts are. and so thises a realm for the -- this is a realm for the legislature. and so we see things like, again, in virginia, you know, we're trying to balance this sort of bright line test versus following the case law. well, we basically gave guidance to our law enforcement by saying the general assembly of virginia said, okay, you want to do realtime location data? you want to do stingrays? you've got to have a search warrant. historic cell tower information, that's different in the sense that -- and to my knowledge, it's not near as accurate as neema makes it out to be. cell tower, historic cell tower information is, basically, you've got a 120-degree angle on your tower, and the range goes maybe as far as two miles. so you've basically got -- you could see within four square miles where someone's phone might be. now technology grows and grows expo yen cially -- exponentiall

and alito a former sharon rabbi is admitting to using temple funds to pay off a blackmailer. that's according to court papers filed after a hearing in the case. prosecutors say barry starr used secretly dating men while married. before a judge friday, starr admitted prosecutors had enough evidence to convict him. the case will be continued and if he's not charged with another crime within a year charges will be dropped. randy: a group of kayakers gets a terrible scare in new york. the mishap landing 10 of them in the hospital. framingham police struggle with a suspect. how they finally managed to subdue the man. money on school lunches, can come down to packaging. the changes that really add up. erika? erika: breaking overnight, two people have died after an overnight crash right outside of the ted williams tunnel. the eastbound side of the tunnel is closed right now. also breaking, one firefighter has a back injury after this four-alarm fire in allston. it broke out on myrick street in boston. cindy? cindy: a little more humid weather, ahead. first here's what to expect when

"the forging of the american navy" won the 2008 samuel alito marston award. -- the 2008 samuel eliot morrison award. in 2018 he received the samuel eliot marston award from the constitutional museum for his body of work. for this evening, george will speak to us for about 30 minutes. then we will invite numbers of the audience to ask questions. please note that c-span is your taping our author event, so speak into the microphone clearly. they will be taping this presentation as well as the q and a. we invite everybody to come on up. if you have a book, george will sign it for you. we have some of his back lists here as well. we have to 1812 book that i spoke about, as well as the fic book. please join me and welcoming author george daughan. [applause] george: thank you for hosting this event. thank you to all these wonderful people who have come here. this book is entitled "revolution on the hudson." new york city and the hudson river valley in the american revolution. its objective is to explain the role of the hudson river valley in the entire revolution. so it's also a book about

. >> reporter: we learned that at the alito meeting of souther committee, big name about a big job signature tourism priorities and how to pay for them. for months it's been knee deep in the stadium donate if we build it, the raiders say they'll come. today a shot across the bow. >> not to be gift we're not going to negotiate. >> reporter: same goldstein said if the double public doesn't come wrap $750 million sheldon adelson son and his sands will walk. >> we would love to see this but 750 is the number and he's not equivocate. >> reporter: the latest cost of the proposed 65,000 seat venue is $1.9 billion. any public money spent would be public money well spent is the sands' position. >> what we're asking for is the a .8% increase in the room tax to build almost a $2 billion stadium. >> reporter: the committees john is to recommend how many how much you public money to spend. the states' biggest and most powerful union jumped in today. dollars to baseball expensive stadium for bill nearest. state lawmakers say they need to sign off fast. if it gets past september the raiders could walk and

. >> justice alito let me separate out what i'm calling life or death and the eligibility decision which is all of the elements of capital murder have been found beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury at the very unanimously or sufficient majority and therefore when the sentencing jury is done you are eligible for the death penalty leaving aside the eighth amendment question whether the constitution then requires the jury to make the intensely moral judgment about whether the penalty should be life without parole or death assuming that a judge can do that. so long as the jury is not told that its input which is how the florida supreme court has put it , so long as they are not told that its it's advisory, so long as they are told that you as the finder's find beyond a reasonable doubt that a capital crime was committed which includes the following elements including one of the twos best-of-five aggregators that constitution is satisfied. the caldwell problem is the eighth amendment problem, caldwell was in a the men the case, and caldwell with the jury is told here at the system exists as

lieutenant governor karen pew alito expressed the importance of the weather service alert on cellphone, potentially preventing injury. >> the technology available soon after the storm hit the area, alerting homeowners and others through their mobile devices, that this storm was coming, and if they could take shelter and reach a safe place. >> the reporter: baker himself said the community got lucky on is how much tree damage was done up there, and thankfully, nobody was hurt. >> the reporter: and just in the last hour and a half, concord police confirmed to me that one worker has injured during the cleanup. what we're told happened is he was with a group of crew members, that were trying to get a bundle of trees into a chipper. one of them popped loose and hit him in the head. unfortunately, he had the good news is he was groggy but talking on the way. live in concord, christine mccarthy, fox 25 news. >> vanessa: in the next half-hour, storm tracker meteorologist jason brewer takes us on an aerial tour of the damage. what he noticed from the sky about how the trees fell that was an imm

justice sotomayor, justice kagan, justice ginsberg, justice alito isn't from that far away, newark, i know it's on the other side of the bridge. so it's very much a new york story that we're going to be exploring together this evening, but i want to begin with the relationship between presidents and justices and offer you an account of the structure of that relationship and in particular here are two big points. that there's a tidal pattern to the american presidency, ebbing and flowing of a tide, and this tidal pattern creates certain very interesting and special face-offs at certain particular moments in american history between presidents and justices. so here is the structure of the situation of the constitution, our justices are chosen politically. justices don't pick their successors quite. it's not a self-per pet waiting meritocracy the way the yale law school faculty picks its successors who pick its successors, the way the cardinals pick the pope and then the pope names cardinals and then the cardinals pick the pope and in this self-per pet waiting way. no, our constitution p

tod justice alito isn't from that far away. newark. you know, i know it's on the other side of the bridge. it's very much a new york story that we're going to be exploring together this evening, but i want to begin with the relationship between presidents and justices and offer you an account of the structure of that relationship, and in particular here are two big points. that there's a tidal pattern to the american presidency ebb and flowing of a tide, and this tidal pattern creates certain very interesting and special face-offs athe certain particular moments in american history between presidents and justices. so here's the structure of the situation of the constitution. our justices are chosen politically. justices don't pick their successors quite. it's not a self-perpetuating meritocracy the way the yale law school faculty picks their successors. the way the cardinals pick the pope and then the pope names cardinals and then the cardinals pick the pope and in this self-perpetuating way. no. our constitution provides for a politic

. >> if i can go back to justice alito's questions about your interpretation, i think what he was suggesting was that it would be completely subsumed under your interpretation. i don't think you got around to answering that question. >> i think that is true, i think this court understands from arguments last week that it's no stranger, they do have a different focus and i think of was quite reasonable for congress to make clear what that focuses. it's aimed at the person who is doing it themselves, the person who obtained it by fraud. it expands that out. >> in just saying that, you are essentially saying yes b expands out meaning it covers everything that a covers and more. >> it's not that this is a statute that anyone is reading because the b section 1345 be permits restraining orders or prohibitions during the course the case as are needed to protect the united states from potential injury. that would subsume the reading that my friend gives. >> do you think there's any. >> go ahead. >> to think there's anyway to read the statute such that it applies to people who wish to retain counsel

>> the irony is in the draft map justice alito to elect those districts however when the independent redistricting commission with the draft map to the final map it was stolen way ratchet they systematically underpopulated. >> but he is asking you whether or not of a deviation is permissible for protecting communities interest or their municipal lines is that permissible? to make guests justice kennedy if incidental and not intentional. >> what does that mean? >> i thought you were saying that it doesn't matter if he we're doing it to obtain the justice department clearance you cannot do it if it is unconstitutional that is that you don't have equal reapportioned districts it goes beyond what is tolerable it is a violation regardless if you are trying to comply is and that you were saying? >> yes. but i think it is important to note we look at this as a qualitative and not quantitative analysis isn't a magic number at this point it is unconstitutional or not but the state's position compliance was like other criteria like protecting communities of interest for geographical boundaries

notes for union city area as well as salsa alito. sand by 101. 880, slowing.hipple where you, look, alternate es turns into union cy boulevard. you know that's an alternate to 880. but stick it out because i just got word that all lanes of the nimitz from reopened southbound out of hayward. now, over here we still have a closure for two lanes southbound 101 at spencer in sausalito. backup going towards the bridgeway off-ramp. stick it out there as well because we hope to have some relief over the next ten minutes. two lanes are still open but that does slow you down, does delay you out of the san rafael and down toward the golden gate bridge and of course the bay bridge metering lights are on. low clouds hovering around the bridge as well. a sheen on the road. i haven't heard of a problem because of slick roadways. >>> coming up next, another big week of putting money back into your pocket. >>> breaking through another benchmark. i'm consumer ga it chris chmura. nbc bay area responds, next. >>> hi, everybody. good morning from rio. coming up on a friday mornin

>> i don't think that's quite right just as alito.hink there has been some confusion on the petitioners side. the two separate notices that operate here in the self-insured plan the first is the notice that the employer provides to the government. that's an erisa plan document that but the legal effect of that document is to exempt the employer from any obligation to provide contraceptive coverage. there's a second document, a different document that the government sends to the third-party administrator. that document is a document that has the legal effect a crazy obligation on the part of the third-party administrator to provide coverage so it's not the case of the document comes to us as an authorizing document. that's an exempting document. >> is their plan in you admit that you're putting something into their plan that they object to on religious grounds. >> the difference between that of mr. clemons hypothetical is one in something tangible physical property and the other involves something that's intangible. >> it's not just th

and as the opinion for the court from justice alito with rodriquez recognized even the top level range was not truly mandatory so even under mandatory guidelines were treated for the purpose is that we looked at here they are not mandatory in the same way so talk about a procedural change. >> so between your formulation that says this is substantive to get away with mandatory life imprison you are articulating it is slightly different tell me why of your articulation. >> i don't think this is substantive daylight between the petitioners position and ours but the description of the crime that ichiro as punishable by a mandatory life imprisonment to treat that as the category sums up the reality of what is happening. breaking out into the component parts it takes the analysis to understand there is a procedural components sentencing courts must now consider the mitigating characteristics of page but also more fundamentally has a component that requires a change in the law. the change was expanding their range previously but the court has said there are changes that restricted the form of

when samuel alito replaced sandra day o'connor day, all nine justices were former federal appeal courthe cot misses something without people who ran for office. sandra day o'connor was the last justice who ran for office. she had been a state senator? arizona. it's a terrible loss nor court they don't have that kind of diversity of experience, but i do think that -- i think the caller is right that the bork experience led presidents to pick people with relativelyiv bland public records, that even though people on the inside might know their actual political views, they are seen as safe choices because they can't be pinned down with controversial opinions. >> host: let me follow up on le that. you write: tempermentally chief justice rhenquist never left the nixon justice department.ti justice o'connor never stopped being a politician. never s antonin schoola, stephen briar, remained the law professors they once wore, and john roberts was a lilt gator whose responsibility was to figure out ways to win. >> guest: that's right. i think that illustrates why diversity is a real value. sandra

justice alito says, congress in 1993 in order to pass very broad protections for religious liberty. word on, he again uses the "broad". ginsberg, in her dissent, begins with the phrase, in a decision h. startling breadt i'm not sure how we have come off using the word narrow to apply to hobby lobby. i suggest that we strike that paragraph for accuracy. let me askstro: which commissioner drafted this and if they might be able to respond? was that commissioner kladney or commissioner achtenberg. >> no, i was not making that noise. commissioner achtenberg this is -- commissioner achtenberg: this is a direct reference to a commission finding. there is an entire analysis that we undertook and that this commission adopted by a majority vote to which -- >> but it is wrong. withssioner achtenberg: regard to our finding, it is not wrong. that is your opinion, .ommissioner, which i respect we were reporting the court finding, which was adopted by majority vote. commissioners,: i know we are all passionate about these issues and we come to it from different expected, -- different perspectives,

chief justice roberts and justice kennedy, breyer and alito joined the opinion. >> will hear argument up by the exclusionary rule to suppress unlawfully seized evidence. the question here is whether to suppress evidence lawfully seized in a search incident to a warrant arrest. because the arresting officer from the warrant and the stop later judged to be unlawful. under this court's continuation analysis, such analysis, such evidence is admissible when here the person stopped resulting from an objectively reasonable miscalculation. extending the exclusionary rule. >> tell me what was objectively reasonable about it? the police officer knew the person he saw coming out of that house in question wasn't doing anything. he did not not know that he lived

justice alito, while he was on the third circuit, considered a hate speech code. he said no right to be protected from offensive speech, even if the school's purpose is to create a safe, secure and nurturing environment. just what these college students are seeking. so if the law demands that high school students and even younger respond toarn how to their peers when they are provoked by noxious speech, surely we can expect university students to do the same. courts have held the same, that shaming and ethnic slurs that i will not repeat. they go beyond micro-aggression. i don't to minimize the pain that is caused by this sort of language. agerdless of the victim's and maturity. so what is going on on our campuses? warnings.ly, trigger professors may choose to give trigger warnings if they want to. in response to those of victims of rape or domestic violence that might be upset by certain discussions. demandedtudents have trigger warnings for a whole range of things they feel sensitive to that may or may not be comparable. likeften really puzzling, don't teach ant

plus another olympic at alito held at gunpoint. i'm live in rio are the ore night development. >> sarah: also breaking a crash on the mass pike ending with serious injuries when two big rigs collide. >> sarah: and breaking overnight, a tense situation in athol. police and swat teams swarm a ho >> this is 7news "today in new england." >> sarah: it's 6:30. thanks for staying us with. i'm sarah french. >> christa: i'm christa delcamp. we're starting things off with your weather. we all want to know, chris. >> chris: much more comfortable out the door. instead of being mere 80, we're closer to 60. the city of boston at 70. lower humidity, as well. a couple light showers and sprinkles back into hartford. may catch a passing sprinkle or a light shower close to the mass that should be about it. more temperatures in the 80s. upper 70s to near 80 for the pats game tonight. >> christa: two tractor-trailers colliding in auburn earlier today. danielle gersh has the latest. >> danielle: this happened eastbound on the pike in auburn. it's just a

there's been a tendency to move towards only the appeals court judges when samuel alito replaced sandra'connor all were federal appeals court judges and i think the court really does miss some things without people that have retro elective office. sandra day o'connor was the last two would run for office. it's terrible they don't have that kind of diversity and experience but i do think that the caller is right about to be bored of experience led to the presidents to pick people with relatively bland public records that even though people on the outside might know their actual political views, they are seen as safe choices because they can't be pinned down with controversial opinion. >> host: you write they never left the nixon justice department. justice o'connor, the senator that you pointed out never stopped being a politician. being a politici antonin scalia remained a the wl professor they once were and john roberts was a litigator whose primary responsibility was to figure out ways to win. >> guest: that's right and i think that is what illustrates why the diversity is a real valu