. >> commissioner antonini. >> we'll i'm in favor of the continuance it is absence unfair to groups in greater numbers not thoughts that was being continued because that was what a lot of people called me i said it will get continued and after the commissioners came up come up what a laundry list there are a lot of things to make that legislation and we should do that here set the tone for the supervisors the supervisors tend to be more political then than we can and look at this and try tee build something that could you mean they'll make the decisions but we're sort of passing it to them with unfinished parts as the speakers awe tests it is a good piece of legislation i want to see more communicated meetings and by april make great strides and in april that will be even more and a lot nor supports i'm voting in favor of the continuance. >> commissioner vice president richards i want to remind everybody we forwarded the list he did that tonight staff i know between now and the time the boards picks up we'll a work on the list and down 0 on paper i look at between now and april another

commissioner antonini >> yeah. a question looks like this is going to be a blade sign and any other signs were allowed for other businesses will be blade signs two probable. >> that's correct the lettering has to be vertical. >> okay sounds like fine i'll move to approve. >> second. >> with modifications suggested by staff if they're okay with the supervisors office. >> very good supervisors a motion be seconded to disappointing adopt a recommendation commissioner antonini commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 14 bay street conditional use authorization. >> good afternoon. brittany of the department staff you have before you a question for conditional use authorization to demolish a chevron automobile service station with a residential building on a property greater than 10 thousand square feet in a c-2 zoning district it is approximately 49 thousand square

thank you for your time and consideration and to mention a shadow in particular that is commissioner antonini who during the 22 ord court hearing distributed houses that were in the orders of 2 three hundred and 21 hundred square feet as good-sized go single-family homes we agree that that that seems reasonable to us so we're asking you, please deny the conditional use here there are - we're trying to not have everybody come up and talk we have some people that didn't get to talk if you could stand up we had anymore people around three or four this afternoon thank you all very much the 32 ord street developer builds over 3 three hundred square feet. >> i'm sorry your time is up. >> >> sorry. >> okay is there any additional public comment? >> okay nirts public comment is closed. >> commissioner richards. >> interestingly enough with the project changed that week can you put the plans up i don't believe i was we got a hardcopy i was interested in the second unit. >> i don't how to focus this thing. >> this is the jury box pearlman this is the second floor the first floor above the street level

. >> commissioner antonini. >> it is not a huge change because the lower unit is fairly small even as it is now, however, you're going there are no to a lot of expense to create that lower floor that is now going to have the studio it seems to me you could do the same thing but the lower floor the garage and have our parking there and take i am the mid floor unit and could be two floors with most of the bedrooms on the upper floor i didn't hear objections to the sized of third story addition they probable said it could be taller or bigger don't like the magnificently that allows you with the framework but add the floor and dig out the bottom and then create a unit a living unit that might be 3 thousand or 3200 square feet on the europe two floors and maybe a 15 or 16 hundred square feet unit i'm not telling you how to make your project but two nice family sized unit. >> commissioner wu. >> you know following on the commission and have the same concern about the bathroom is seems like it not intend to be a studio but a pass through room to get to the garage would like to see more artic

and opening up to commissioner commissioner antonini. >> yeah.is project clearly didn't have a negative fetish on the decreasing to the southeast, east and south not impede on their life enrichment committee it will be the same their light and air will be it is i believe union street so what is in question i'll ask mr. lindsey is the averaging done correctly? >> well average didn't come into the discussion here because this is other than rh1 zoning district and a straight 25 percent. >> averaging - as long as you do the rear yard satisfy that then you don't necessarily have to average. >> the averaging comment came from sort of a standard we'll use in a situation like that there is a transitional building between a deeper and shorter building and the staff the residential guidelines generally says expend the adjacent building to the average of the two, that can be achieved in a couple of ways achieved by having the hole building extend to the half hour point or the building the bulk or the massing the of the building against the deeper building a

vice president to achieve you folks added in terms of design changes a. >> commissioner antonini. >> i'm probable okay. i don't know if commissioner moore want to bring this back. >> i think the project should come back i on a good learning experience not a pro transacted meeting but help all of us i flu fully trust the department to direct what is the needs to be done a nod from the - not an expensive configuration but should come back. >> i'm going to move to continue jonas when do you think we could have the availability to see that. >> commissioners i'll only say through march you have very, very full calendar so at this point if architect would like how many times will you need. >> to make those changes as far as the changes it is easy, however, flipping the building that will take more fit to make sure everything works i see your point in that the larger bays are more transmittal i critical to the studios and more leeway. >> sir, i'm sorry i'm kind of occurs how much time. >> probable two or three weeks. >> may i interrupt the clarification on the windows that needs to be inclu

commissioner president fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we do expect commissioner vice president richards to arrive shortly and commissioner johnson is out on maternity leaving e leave commissioners, the first item on your agenda for continuance at the time of issuance no items proposed for continuance, however, we have received a request into the mayor's office of housing and community development a request to continue item 9 affordable housing program a planning code amendment to march 24, 2016 and we have received a request from staff to continue item 7 under our discretionary review calendar filbert street a discretionary review indefinitely by any public comment on the two items promoted for continuance okay. we'll call those (calling names). >> really, really yes. i live across the street from the proposed project and the reason that the applicant has requested a continuance is that we dmroefrd yesterday the roof deck that they seek to assess through the rooftop elevator box was at permitted and is illegal sir not to interrupt you

commissioner president fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we do expect commissioner vice president richards to arrive shortly and commissioner johnson is out on maternity leaving e leave commissioners, the first item on your agenda for continuance at the time of issuance no items proposed for continuance, however, we have received a request into the mayor's office of housing and community development a request to continue item 9 affordable housing program a planning code amendment to march 24, 2016 and we have received a request from staff to continue item 7 under our discretionary review calendar filbert street a discretionary review indefinitely by any public comment on the two items promoted for continuance okay. we'll call those (calling names). >> really, really yes. i live across the street from the proposed project and the reason that the applicant has requested a continuance is that we dmroefrd yesterday the roof deck that they seek to assess through the rooftop elevator box was at permitted and is illegal sir not to interrupt you

commissioner president fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we do expect commissioner vice president richards to arrive shortly and commissioner johnson is out on maternity leaving e leave commissioners, the first item on your agenda for continuance at the time of issuance no items proposed for continuance, however, we have received a request into the mayor's office of housing and community development a request to continue item 9 affordable housing program a planning code amendment to march 24, 2016 and we have received a request from staff to continue item 7 under our discretionary review calendar filbert street a discretionary review indefinitely by any public comment on the two items promoted for continuance okay. we'll call those (calling names). >> really, really yes. i live across the street from the proposed project and the reason that the applicant has requested a continuance is that we dmroefrd yesterday the roof deck that they seek to assess through the rooftop elevator box was at permitted and is illegal sir not to interrupt you

i received phone call from the tenants in the building. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah.r what's the residents are in those towers i would assume on the on top of drawings is that where the residents are living or in the lower levels from the towers. >> roughly 9 months i. >> my understanding in the at all tower is the residents that the community members to talking about the other tower, if you will, or penthouse is an office i don't believe anyone lives there. >> she lives in one with her child and all the other residents are below. >> what's the distance from the penthouse in which the speaker lives to the nearest antenna. >> i believe 50 feet. >> 50 feet and, of course, i can or will test r f emissions from the when it is installed with relationship to that place as well as the unit. >> that's right that's part of conditions as the gentleman described we will be happy to inquiry with the planning to have that test done. >> my final question the roof is not for people to be wondering around or come up to the area the antennas. >> there's a community garden that was ref

so i'm supportive. >> commissioner antonini. >> i have a couple of comments and a question. first of all i would urge project sponsor, if this should be approved to continue to work as the project moves forward to outreach to all parts of the community as far as how it's being built and who is going to build it and everything? it's not of course a condition, but it's certainly something that i would like to see the project sponsor to do. as per earlier conversation, in terms of the height, it's very clear that they have the 18' retail. which i have had some letters that have questioned that, but they satisfy all points as far as the height and it's allowed. and they have more than enough on the ground floor retail. the other question that was raised is a little confusing. it was that the ground entries to the ground floor units have to be 3-5' above grade. i'm hearing two different things. first of all, i think project sponsor said they had to raise the whole thing 2' to start with at clara and 6th and then i understand there is a 2' raise to the beginning of the porch, that

. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you for staff and all commenters who commented on this important subject i tend to be supportive of the comments from the pack because i find it really bad to change rules in mid-stream two projects that are being do evaluated and filing dates in 2009 so i think that is not a good thing to do and i don't like singling out one neighborhood the many eastern neighborhoods we've approved to have those additional controls, however, i do you know maybe inclined to vote favor in favor for one reason if we set up reasonable perimeter and if they're met those projects are approved fairly easily that maybe nephew on my part seeing rules to meet the so-called demand and then there is a reason why it didn't work anyway it is work or worthy a try the focus like wiener one of the speakers talks about the changes occurred in the mission the negative ones displacement and other things these those are a result of factors other than building more housing they're actually a result of not building enough housing i think labor if my statistics are correct they were onl

. >> commissioner antonini autopsy i'm also supportive i think that is a very good project for all the reasons as mention 7 thousand open square feet of open space affordable housing and over one million dollars in fees and i know ownership which i like to see we've had so few projects that have ownership in a city that has you know only 1/3rd owners sterilization i think step in the right direction it will address the needs of people trying to buy they're first units it would be a very good option and i agree with commissioner moore i think that is important since you have a board front whatever landscaping is good and crafts with everything else it is the treatment isblas day their isn't anything green it is important it be done the right way. >> commissioners a motion seconded to approve commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner richards commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. >> commissioners that place us on items 12 case castro street a conditional use autho

is commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong first on our agenda is items proposed for continuance seeing no items place you on the next item the consent calendar item - >> i just want to mention. >> one second can you help with the mike. >> thank you, commissioners i want to mention we're the last item on the agenda and if it is of interest to you it looks like a long calendar i'm fine with continuing and fine with staying i want to mention in our interest. >> who which item. >> the dr requester who say, oh continuance. >> i'm saying as someone mentioned i could ask you if it is you're preference. >> is the project sponsor here as well? >> i think so. >> we'll keep the item on the agenda as scheduled thank you. >> thank you. >> to no items proposed for continuance any public comment on continuance? okay seeing none, public comment is closed >> commissioner moore. >> move to continue. >> there's nothing to continue. >> sorry i'm already on overdrive. >> okay commissioners that places y

commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioners, the first item on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance item one requirement for certain restrictions on units it has been withdrawn as item 2 requirement for certain restrictions on certain dwelling units has also been withdrawn oh, excuse me. further under our discretionary review authorization calendar i'm pleased to noumgs item 4 ab at 160 through 64 bein regard street discretionary review authorization has been withdrawn commissioners questions or comments i want to get a clarification from staff not necessarily today but the zoning in the he eastern neighborhoods and i just want to know my understanding was mo u will allow pdr to allow the retail a lot of things that are allowed i don't believe? specifics they have is to be equal amounts of use and not specify that any given building has to have at least as far as the eastern neighborhoods it seems to me also that when we did this we had parts of th

okay not seeing any, public comment is closed. >> commissioner antonini autopsy yeah. thank you for a very good report i had a couple of questions on specifics part of what you mention, of course, the 16th street improvements i'm not sure if that includes centralizing the transit in the street as with the van ness plus regional transit with the light rail. >> so, yes dedicated along some portions the 16th street for the 22 i believe is what they're looking at is actually a splits one of the transit only lanes will be running through the center and another i think did westbound is on the side running they want to accommodate some concerns from the potrero residents how to effect the challenges lacking making left-hand turns but, yes transit priority approach to the 22 fillmore. >> okay. i think central is the best you board you know uniform broadly from both sides is best for transit but whatever we can workout and fulsome i assume we're pursuing the two-way traffic on fulsome for the future i've heard in the plans and wooulgd the sidewalks and making more of the center

commissioner president fong commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu we expect commissioner johnson to be absent and commissioner vice president richards should arrive shortly commissioners, the first item on your agenda consideration for items proposed for continuance 29 through 31 had i didn't street proposed for continuance until march further from the discretion calendar important item 11 i'm pleased to notify you on green street one of the of the two drs has been withdrawn one is withdrawn that's all i have i have no speaker card. >> any public comment on the

on that motion to continue this matter with specific questions from the commission commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore no commissioner wu no commissioner richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes that passes 4 to two with commissioner moore's and commissioner wu voting against that places us in general public comment i have no speaker cards. >> any general public comment seeing none, the meeting is adjourned >> power it's all around us in the sun and the winds and caves waves power that lights our homes while protecting our natural resources clean power will provide power to san franciscans how about works right now our power is from pg&e from non-renewable systems that comes over pg&e maintained lines with clean power your energy about think generated by caesarean more renewable sources come to our home e.r. businesses to the pg&e lines (shouting.). >> more and more city's high san francisco is committing to dislocate to end all traffic death that means improving safety for people walking and driving and safety on our s

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. it is understood in the same sense we would allow the project sponsor to utilize existing studies to answer those questions maybe coming before them as far as housing production production of affordable housing they don't have to do their own easement this comes up and as far as displacement pressures again that is pretty conceptually or conjectural i don't know why they'll have to have a story their displacing people the study by the ted egan kind of talks about that all right. that's understood in the motion they'll not have to produce those things and let's see i think everything else was fine can i ask mr. - sir answer me from there 15 months is that going to work for you guys? >> i'll borrow from someone else's statements you don't i can't remember but the short time but we don't have it, too short 12 or 15 i think it could create a process. >> i'll tend to be supportive of 15 presumably that is mission 2020 in place by the time and give them more time i think i'm in support the

>> okay not seeing any, public comment is closed. >> and moving to commissioners commissioner antoninithis project a lot and have a lot of comments i'll ask the questions first maybe the project sponsor first of all, on the jessie street closure to you have traffic from what i understand it is being replaced by a couple additional alleyways that have been activated i believe if i have it correctly what was you haautomos - am a right about the jessie street situation? good afternoon, commissioners dan with reuben, junius & rose yes. you are correct there is a change in the circulation pattern with this site the idea to close a portion of jessie street to throw traffic that will remaform 700 to have the s assess and jessie street will be rerouted inform mission it is a good thing it stacks some of the traffic off of first street and ublgdz to matt >> thank you as you recall seeing the map there still will, automotive traffic on jessie but a round instead of coming all the way through that is much better there should be outreach to the golden gate students but it seems like it is ideal fo

. >> thanks for reminding me the action is a land use on the action okay commissioner antonini. >> thank you. i'm in agreement with virtually everyone the speakers have said i want to clarify the project sponsor representation tried to make a point that owner was being show you treated different she didn't reside in one of the units of she resided 2, 3, 4 one of the units she'd be restricted to sharing the unit while present or renting it as as short-term rental for to number of limited days the renters in the other units presumably will be long term renters will have that same ability so whether she choose to live here as a be full-time residential the law didn't change she's in violation either wa i'm very much in favor of d disapproval and i know not compatible with the neighborhood and even though on the other hand, even if it were an area a lot of additional hotels probable not wise to turn this into short-term rental units so and certainly this is being going on for many years now the time is come to keys this operation and make it clear 0 others doing the same thing this will mapl

roof deck all the way back to the line and leaving out the extra deck on the floor commissioner antonini and i agree with the concerns addressed by even though speakers and to some degree with what commissioner moore said i think that a good project it could be better if it were 3 units with each around 16 or 17 hundred square feet with 3 car parking that would be a single-family unit one can identify large enough for families to put their car they'll be driving if they choose to go to schools on the other side of town but if they go to saint phil's is a good idea to get construction and families that occupy rather than competing for families stoke he could buy the way it is put together the retail parking needs to be improved you look at the gift store next door it is welcoming you have a clear windows and some forecasting along the front you don't need floor to ceiling windows i can't tell if so the interest for the residential units but as much as possible it needs to be more welcoming put some wood and make that look more a corn unless and make that look at the rest of noah valley th

. >> commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> commissioners that places us on item 12 27th avenue an abbreviated discretionary review. >> one more then we have - >> good afternoon again commissioners i'm david lindsey department staff. >> the project at 156, 27th avenue the major alteration of a single-family home with the replacement felt front facade a horizon addition at the rear and a new fourth destroyer if so at an monument to demolition and pursuant to the planning code 317 the zoning administrator reviewed the project and authorized the administrative de facto demolition that the subject property is not financial assessable housing the subject property on the east side of 27th avenue between lake and el camino the outdoor richmond neighborhoods the 1907 house is on a one hundred 20 feet deep lot the zoning is rh1 bedrooms on the rage from two to four stories buildings on the opposite are two and 4 stories the house immedi

. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you for staff and all commenters who commented on this important subject i tend to be supportive of the comments from the pack because i find it really bad to change rules in mid-stream two projects that are being do evaluated and filing dates in 2009 so i think that is not a good thing to do and i don't like singling out one neighborhood the many eastern neighborhoods we've approved to have those additional controls, however, i do you know maybe inclined to vote favor in favor for one reason if we set up reasonable perimeter and if they're met those projects are approved fairly easily that maybe nephew on my part seeing rules to meet the so-called demand and then there is a reason why it didn't work anyway it is work or worthy a try the focus like wiener one of the speakers talks about the changes occurred in the mission the negative ones displacement and other things these those are a result of factors other than building more housing they're actually a result of not building enough housing i think labor if my statistics are correct they were onl

antonini brown cuts across the field. how many yards does he cover? we know the speed, the quickness. it's there. 80 yards. big play of the game. jim: and wait till you see this development. look who's back ready to go. ben roethlisberger. tracy, you were backstage to see what happened. what cananou tell us? tracy: that's right, jim. we saw him go directly into the extra room. he spent about 10 minutes inside there and then he was carted out without his pads. no sling on whatsoever. into the locker room. they made arrangements to get his pads and everything back on. i was told he's coming back out and going to try to get back out there. jim: wow, not surprising, is it? phil: what did i say a couple of weeks ago? it's part of being the steelers quarterback. he had the helmet on but landry is coming out. phil: there you go. not good enough to come back into this game. jim: maybe what it says ishere is no backup to jones so if you had to at least have somebody come out and hand it off. phil: good point. you see him moving his arm around showing everybody

. >> commissioner antonini. >> present. >> commissioner hillis. >> here. >> commission richards here. >> commissioner moore will be absent. >> commissioner buell. >> here. >> commissioner low. >> here. >>> commissioner bonilla. >>

is commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong first on our agenda is items proposed for continuance seeing no items place you on the next item the consent calendar item - >> i just want to mention. >> one second can you help with the mike. >> thank you, commissioners i w

. >> commissioner antonini. >> thank you appreciate all the comments i have some comments of my own andhopefully, we'll address and been on the commission 14 years one thing is consistent we've built very little housing for middle-income groups and you know that was the case in 2002, it rims the cost by percentages lower than it has ever been the fact we're talking about middle-income for somewhat higher medium income group is ruled while slaerlz are there's significantly in san francisco for people who will be considered middle-income the price of housing has increased hugely it is impossible for people who have what in other areas considered to be significant incomes even two of them two firefighters, you know two police officers, many other progressions even combined are having problz buying maufts market rate housing talks about a segment that is essential to our contingency that is a very good legislation i think so i may be corrected this will allow for a higher and descender building under southern circumstances corey broke out up those hearings will come up as large project auth

. >> commissioner antonini. >> present. >> commissioner hillis. >> here. >> commission richards here. >> commissioner moore will be absent. >> commissioner buell. >> here. >> commissioner low. >> here. >>> commissioner bonilla. >> here commissioner harrison. >> here. >> commissioner mcdonnell? >> here. >> commissioner levitan has an excuse the absence. >> please note the joint commissions will hold one public hearing for the public to provide testimony on all items listed below. following the public hearing, the recreation and park commission will act joinly with the planning commission in adopting findings under the california environmental quality act and recreation and park commission will consider making a recommendation to the planning commission regarding the possible adverse impact of shadow on gene friend recreation center. following action on those items the recreation and park commission will adjourn and planning commission will remain in session and separately consider all other items. items 1a, b, c, and d for case numbers 2011-0586k and x at 363 6th street. item is a is t

is commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richardsssioner wu commissioner president fong first on our agenda is i

commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and

commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnsonommissioner moore commissioner richards commissioners, the first item on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance item one requirement for certain restrictions on units it has been withdrawn as item 2 requirement for certain restrictions on certain dwelling units has also been withdrawn oh, excuse me. further under our discretionary review authorization calendar i'm pleased to noumgs item

is commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu commissioner president fong first on our agenda is items proposed for continuance seeing no items place you on the next item the consent calendar