>> okay in the first place public comment is closed. >> and commissioner antonini. >> yeah. i think that is a very good legislation and basically codifies it something that is in fact, the condition but because of an error at the beginning not included to brings things up to where they should be i have a question for mr. starr regards to the density bonus program more things will take precedent over a state law. >> yes. but rh1 was left out of the code and state law required to have a adu. >> the city program that was passed so for . >> correct. >> you know i think some of the proposals did talk about that those have not been infected as yet our city program what we just or less approved side accessary dwellings will not allow them rhd-1 neighborhoods. >> correct i was told though because state law requires accessary dwellings in zoning district zoned for single-family home or multi single-family homes that we have to allow an adu per state law they set out guidelines if we change the adu program under that to be subject to controls for adu's they'll leave them out to the st

. >> commissioner antonini >> i generally like a lot of things about this project. first, in terms of the parking. i mean these are nice units. they can be for sale units and i don't get into a situation where we sell self-selected, people can live in san francisco. once you don't have cars or want to have cars. i mean if you do buy a unit in its going to be a nice unit of ghana one have a place to put your car and people going shopping or taking your kid somewhere if you have any or probably not going to want to go over to van ness invite the students from galileo per space on the bus when you go down van ness. i often will take muni bell walked from market and van ness to my dental office on franklin street which is 2 miles but it's better than getting onto those crowded buses. they're going to get better when the bus rapid transit but it still isn't done the way it should be done in the subways are light rail. anyway, that being said, i've no problem with the amount of parking. it's only one car. units. if you things that could be improved. first of all the exter

p commissioner antonini. >> yeah. this is a very good project i'm happy to hear it is part of mission for a section of eastern neighborhoods and very supportive and hopefully expend the same kind of supports be the affordable or market-rate as they come before us i have a few questions he saw there was a - exempt from environmental review is this the same as the community plan a statewide exemption because this is an variable project. >> thank you commissioner antonini this is a statutory project because it met the criteria about that been 100 percent affordable thank you it is approvable underneath you know we have to apply the same standards regardless if it is affordable or foot affordable but under what the community exemption from the eastern neighborhoods. >> part of the review take into account the previously scope of work on the eir so it did fall under that review and it found it in fill will not have more significant effects than the pressure eir. >> that's important to note it is a project that has been ana

i first want to thank commissioner antonini first 12 years service on this commission. i tuned in at 10 pm at night when i got back home and unwind and sure enough you're still digging in and asking the tough questions. >> thank you good actually 14 years but i appreciate it. >> sorry. so, on this project broadly supportive of adding housing at this location. however, we think there is changes that could be made. one, he was just mentioned by department staff and sponsor this the transit rich area. so, why are we having seven parking spaces. yes we follow the plane when which the code but the zoning administrator does have the ability to grant an exemption from parking so we would ask for a little parking as possible. we can say transit rich and then say we need one to one parking. so that's on parking. we also think that this site can have more than eight units if that is possible. if that's a bit of a stretch than we really insist on eight units at this site. the unit sizes are quite large. my understanding is that this is going to be a first sale project just give yo

commissioner antonini. >> yeah. the commissioners should have been in receipt of information i sent them produced by pablo of the planning department staff on earlier information he provided on the percentage or number of units built in both the eastern neighborhoods and the mission district those that have been entitled and those that are under construction as a percentage of the preferred option and also he went into the amount of pdr space that has been converted since the passage of eastern neighborhoods as a percentage of the option c that is what the planning commission approved in 2008, so, anyway this is even more emphatic and factored out the projects that had been approved prior to the eastern neighborhoods eir krunthd that distorted making it look like more built and pdr change concurring so after that was done came up with fingers figures of less than one percent of the allowable pdr that was analyzed in the eastern neighborhoods plan for the mission has been taken out of pdr that is important as we go f

commissioner antonini. >> yeah. the commissioners should have been in receipt of information i sent them produced by pablo of the planning department staff on earlier information he provided on the percentage or number of units built in both the eastern neighborhoods and the mission district those that have been entitled and those that are under construction as a percentage of the preferred option and also he went into the amount of pdr space that has been converted since the passage of eastern neighborhoods as a percentage of the option c that is what the planning commission approved in 2008, so, anyway this is even more emphatic and factored out the projects that had been approved prior to the eastern neighborhoods eir krunthd that distorted making it look like more built and pdr change concurring so after that was done came up with fingers figures of less than one percent of the allowable pdr that was analyzed in the eastern neighborhoods plan for the mission has been taken out of pdr that is important as we go f

commissioner antonini. >> yeah. the commissioners should have been in receipt of information i sent them produced by pablo of the planning department staff on earlier information he provided on the percentage or number of units built in both the eastern neighborhoods and the mission district those that have been entitled and those that are under construction as a percentage of the preferred option and also he went into the amount of pdr space that has been converted since the passage of eastern neighborhoods as a percentage of the option c that is what the planning commission approved in 2008, so, anyway this is even more emphatic and factored out the projects that had been approved prior to the eastern neighborhoods eir krunthd that distorted making it look like more built and pdr change concurring so after that was done came up with fingers figures of less than one percent of the allowable pdr that was analyzed in the eastern neighborhoods plan for the mission has been taken out of pdr that is important as we go f

first of all thank you commissioner antonini. it's been a pleasure speaking before you today. we have not always agreed but i do want to say you've always been very clear articulate. it's clear you're well-versed on the issues. i am employed in the cannabis industry. i consider nate hoss a colleague and have reviewed this project based on land use, location, security plans, designed layout and i think it's an exceptional project. i do want to speak briefly on on-site consumption did i work at a dispensary to that does not have on-site consumption. it is actually one most frequent questions that i receive is asked folks asking where can i medicate. we really just don't have an answer. for folks. you know they may-it's a lot of situations where they can't medicate in a safe space. maybe your home work hotel street or otherwise they don't want to medicate in public. some live in housing where they may have roommate situations, federal housing restrictions they may live in sro. hotels at such a. i think this will be a space that safe and secure for them to medicate. it's also way

commissioner antonini. >> yeah. very much i appreciate all the comment but one thing i won't miss is hearings like this because i appreciate everybody's opinion but oftentimes you know as i will point out in some of my comments not based on fact and certainly is a them but adrian said what is not to last week about this project it is a good project i was happy one different thing a lot of the same people opposing but tell her people from the area in supports and made the point while we appreciate the efforts of the latino criminality district and the fact they represent prodi preservation al 24th street sector of the community and these people made it clear that they're the community and speaking for more diversity it is what the opposition is talking about the diversity this is the diversity more people owner move-in into the mission district and making that a more diverse neighborhood with that said, should find particulars i'm talking about one the speakers brought this table about all the housing in the mission

commissioner antonini commissioner moore >> him and ask we continue this. i may not have a date certain because you make after re--notice the provisions that they put with the two units are now and they also create a garage unit. whatever size they feel is appropriate. that would be maybe it's indefinite continuance so i think that's my motion >> can you rephrase it? >> well, i'm going to continue this project indefinitely with direction being that project sponsor will create two units on the site where they have designed a single unit in keeping with two fairly equal size units hopefully. then, a garage unit with a grudge is that would be my intention to have to come back for a separate see you. >> there's a motion. moved and seconded. mr. moore >> i thought we were trying to protect the affordable units. that's at least >> [inaudible] >> that's not what we're doing >> no. two units. >> you are saying the two units will be rebuilt good they will be market rate and its inevitable when you rebuild that's the form they do. >> the rebuild will be rent control.

commissioner antonini commissioner moore >> him and ask we continue this. i may not have a date certain because you make after re--notice the provisions that they put with the two units are now and they also create a garage unit. whatever size they feel is appropriate. that would be maybe it's indefinite continuance so i think that's my motion >> can you rephrase it? >> well, i'm going to continue this project indefinitely with direction being that project sponsor will create two units on the site where they have designed a single unit in keeping with two fairly equal size units hopefully. then, a garage unit with a grudge is that would be my intention to have to come back for a separate see you. >> there's a motion. moved and seconded. mr. moore >> i thought we were trying to protect the affordable units. that's at least >> [inaudible] >> that's not what we're doing >> no. two units. >> you are saying the two units will be rebuilt good they will be market rate and its inevitable when you rebuild that's the form they do. >> the rebuild will be rent control.

thank you commissioner antonini. >> thank you yes. very impressed by this work spent the better part of last week reading all of the detail in the eir responses and the estn and i think that has been done very well and it present a lot of alternatives and you know, i know there are many comments but most of comments and comments responses dealt with the operations of the academy of art university rather than the adequacy of the eir which i think almost universal people of the this was adequate accurate and comprehensive there are areas of some cloudness i think can be resolved through the alternatives and during the approval process we'll follow with the individual items before us the issue of how many housing units actually were previously long term housing units and now student housing is a difficult target to identify we'll hear with more about that in the next item there is questionable nature the actual status of units before they became without permits for student housing for the academy of art university and there is also a big

commissioner antonini commissioner moore >> him and ask we continue this. i may not have a date certain because you make after re--notice the provisions that they put with the two units are now and they also create a garage unit. whatever size they feel is appropriate. that would be maybe it's indefinite continuance so i think that's my motion >> can you rephrase it? >> well, i'm going to continue this project indefinitely with direction being that project sponsor will create two units on the site where they have designed a single unit in keeping with two fairly equal size units hopefully. then, a garage unit with a grudge is that would be my intention to have to come back for a separate see you. >> there's a motion. moved and seconded. mr. moore >> i thought we were trying to protect the affordable units. that's at least >> [inaudible] >> that's not what we're doing >> no. two units. >> you are saying the two units will be rebuilt good they will be market rate and its inevitable when you rebuild that's the form they do. >> the rebuild will be rent control.

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. thank you all for your comments i'll opposed to any kinds of continuance a lot of the project the comments by supervisor campos are answersable by some of the things i'm going to tell you about now and some of the things we've known about first of all, you know luxury hours matters of is not luxury hours market-rate is what people are willing to pay for 2 in some economically depressed area that is low priced much lower than than market-rate if in an area so you get after it is more expensive that is realty the fact there are 5 thousand new people into the mission district every year we we've built almost no new housing i went over this at the beginning of the meeting many of you were not here those 5 thousand people have to live somewhere their oftentimes coming in and living where previous mission residents lived so those who are trying to i am apply we have caused displacement from building housing master in the mission we haven't built any a total of 200 and 27 units not all marke

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. thank you all for your comments i'll opposed to any kinds of continuance a lot of the project the comments by supervisor campos are answersable by some of the things i'm going to tell you about now and some of the things we've known about first of all, you know luxury hours matters of is not luxury hours market-rate is what people are willing to pay for 2 in some economically depressed area that is low priced much lower than than market-rate if in an area so you get after it is more expensive that is realty the fact there are 5 thousand new people into the mission district every year we we've built almost no new housing i went over this at the beginning of the meeting many of you were not here those 5 thousand people have to live somewhere their oftentimes coming in and living where previous mission residents lived so those who are trying to i am apply we have caused displacement from building housing master in the mission we haven't built any a total of 200 and 27 units not all marke

. >> commissioner antonini. >> yeah. thank you all for your comments i'll opposed to any kinds of continuance a lot of the project the comments by supervisor campos are answersable by some of the things i'm going to tell you about now and some of the things we've known about first of all, you know luxury hours matters of is not luxury hours market-rate is what people are willing to pay for 2 in some economically depressed area that is low priced much lower than than market-rate if in an area so you get after it is more expensive that is realty the fact there are 5 thousand new people into the mission district every year we we've built almost no new housing i went over this at the beginning of the meeting many of you were not here those 5 thousand people have to live somewhere their oftentimes coming in and living where previous mission residents lived so those who are trying to i am apply we have caused displacement from building housing master in the mission we haven't built any a total of 200 and 27 units not all marke

commissioner antonini >> face. see a lot of similarities between the existing house and our first house that we bought in 1976 in the park. in fact, the floor plan of the existing main floor is very similar to just doing the math quickly, i doubt that's more than about 12 75 ft.2. that's what you really counted at least in the old days when you talk to realtors. they don't come downstairs areas. garage, storage, that's not square footage. anyway, what is a difference with our house was it was built in 1931 but in 1945 somebody put what we called an airplane room and it was pretty much what you are proposing. it was a bedroom and bath on the upper floor to serve as a master because these houses have the two bedrooms in the back usually would adore coming out of one of them to the backyard and they are fine. but, when and if you start having multiple children then you're kind of got everybody on the same floor and having that extra room up above was a big selling point when we bought that house. so, i think your plan

commissioner antonini. >> thank you yeah, a lot of interesting discussions but what we're focusing on a more narrow issue than this particular ordinance and it is the 7 housing sites and one institutional site that has been initiated permanent by the academy so that will occur regardless of whether we initiate for the staffs recommendation which incidentally has changed since originally prepared as it may but more on that to go a few side issues i mean a lot of discussion will housing but you know we have to have equal protection under the law i mean students are going to live somewhere maybe their parents and may live in a dorm or housing somewhere that they compete with others within the city there was a time when up went went to santa clara a requirement to live on campus they/the philosophy in the local in latino taking the role of the parents from the parents while you're there they have prefix and mr. farrell in the 80s and 90s, the percentage of students that lived in dorms was very small because they preferred to live off campus they had nor freedoms and only recently has this