simply a layering of a bunch of different, you know, strange statements, but first of all, what arachami did not say, but what the russian, well, propagandists are trying to attribute to him, so arakhamia did not say that ukraine was going to sign some agreements with someone, and that these agreements were not allowed to be signed by some external forces at the beginning of the war, and that ukraine directly sought to surrender, but arahamia definitely did not say this. moreover, he said that all the negotiations with russia actually rested on the fact that russia was not going to leave ukrainian, ukrainian territory, they were going to literally stand somewhere, that is, where they captured something, and then sign something there and so on , well, let's go, let's not go, that was already the question, well, let 's see, first of all, what about this, well, he said arahamia, in words, they were ready for a lot of words, but we understood that everyone has something on each side. there is a game of its own, well, that is, this whole game directly depended on successes or defeats at the f

ukraine, then putin showed the document, but no one believed in this either then, but now, when arachamitep by step, exactly how the peace negotiations broke down, it becomes clear that everything they arranged in buche, they arranged themselves, they killed their own citizens only in order to publicly explain to the world why they jumped out of the agreements that they agreed to just a couple of days ago, well, as you can see, nothing about what in there was a riot, an arhamia... i didn't say anything at all, well, in this context, because a riot is a riot, but what happened in istanbul is what happened in istanbul, these are different things, and the russian crime in the riot - this is a russian crime , but again, why do i say that manipulation, because these words, for some reason, they did not give literally what was said in the next seconds of this interview, which completely refute this whole set of words, russian propagandists, and we will look at it, well, to see what was actually said, to what extent this process of belarus and istanbul was overseen by washington, london, warsaw

laughter in ukraine. then putin showed the document, but no one believed it then either, but now, when arachami basically explains step by step how it was the peace negotiations that broke down, it becomes clear that everything that they arranged in buche, they arranged themselves, they killed their own citizens only in order to publicly explain to the world why they jumped out of the agreements that... they agreed to literally a couple of days ago back. well, as you can see, arkhamia did not say anything about what happened in bucha at all, well, in this context, because bucha is a bucha, and what happened there in istanbul is what happened in istanbul, that different things, and a russian crime in buch is a russian crime in buch. but again, why i say it's manipulation, because these words, for some reason they are. did not give literally what was said in the next seconds of this interview, which completely refutes this whole set of words of russian propagandists, but we will look at it, well , to see what was actually said, how much this process of belarus and istanbul was supervised by washi

suddenly really strange statements, both from the side of maryana bezuglya, and from the side of arachamiwhich were, well , let's say it, yesterday we analyzed in great detail, not so much what he said, but what he said, but even what he said was said carelessly, to say the least, why is this internal thing happening now, you know, well, the turbulence is strange, well, it is obvious that after the articles and statements that came from both the military leadership and the political leadership, there should have been some clarity, and at least the next step, if we are talking about that , that at the front we are observing a certain pause, we are talking about getting involved in a positional war, on the one hand, on the other hand, we hear from bankova that it is not worth going into politics in the military leadership, that is, these statements of the banker are taken as certain political statements, and therefore we see an aggravation, well, not a contradiction, but a divergence in the direction of the political process, perhaps the banks are overestimating or somehow drawing a picture

talks, it caused laughter in the west, in ukraine, but this was also then no one believed, now, when arachamistep by step exactly how the peace negotiations broke down, it becomes clear that everything they arranged in buche, they arranged themselves, they killed their citizens only in order to publicly explain to the peace, why did they jump off the agreements that...

eyes suddenly really strange statements, both on the part of maryana beznoglu and on the part of arachamiesterday we analyzed it in great detail, there it was not so much what he said, how much he was interpreted, but even the fact that he said, it was said carelessly, to say the least. why is this internal , you know, strange turbulence happening now? well, it is obvious that after the articles and statements that flowed. there should have been some clarity from the military leadership as well as from the political leadership, at least the next step, if we talk about the fact that at the front we we are observing a certain pause, we are talking about getting involved in a positional war, on the one hand, on the other hand, we hear from the bankers that it is not worth going into politics in the military leadership, that is, these statements of the banker... are perceived as certain political statements, and therefore we see an aggravation, well, not a contradiction, but a divergence in the directions of the political process, perhaps the banks overestimate or somehow paint a picture for

reasons for having some kind of plan, all that we heard today from, well, in your quote from david arachamiknow, in us there was no plan at all for the 23rd year, we had such a plan, we could have predicted it all , something was written there, because no one, more than commander-in-chief zaluzhny, actually gave any plan to society. unfortunately, he did it through the western media. because in ukraine we avoid serious discussions about the problems at the front. in the ukrainian media, this does not resonate, and he wrote for the economist. he wrote the five positions of the servant, which must be done immediately. there, by the way, there is a line of defense on which, for example, no decision has been made yet, yes, how to deal with it, there is the question of providing the army with the dronava fp rebs and other new technologies, and these are really basic technologies of war, there is the question of mobilization, and we must surely find an answer to it together, because it is an extremely painful question and it is really, first of all, the most painful for politicians, because it lo

for any availability some kind of plan, all that we... today from, well, in your quote by david arachamion't know, we had a plan for the 23rd year at all, we had such a plan, we could have foreseen all this, there something was written down, because no one, more than the commander-in-chief, zaluzhny, actually gave any plan to society , unfortunately, he did it through the western media, because in ukraine we avoid serious discussions about the problems at the front, it is not heard in the ukrainian media, and he wrote all the ekonomst, he wrote five positions of the employee, which must be done immediately, there to things are the line of defense, on which, for example, no decision has been made yet, yes, how to deal with it, there is the question of providing the army with rebs, fpv, drones and other new technologies, and these are really basic technologies of war, there is the question of mobilization , and surely we must jointly find an answer to it, because this is an extremely painful question and it is really, first of all, the most painful for politicians, because it lowers the ra

the latest statements of the people's deputies of ukraine from the servant of the people and david arachamind mariyana bezugloi are connected with this, who are already beginning to accuse valery zaluzhny there that they do not have a plan for 2024, i think that you have read this mariyana bezulla's post, now we will show and tell to our tv viewers, maybe not everyone uses social networks, that mariana bezugla, who is on... a deputy of ukraine from the servant of the people and the deputy head of the parliamentary committee on national defense, what she wrote, she wrote about the fact that neither big nor small , neither asymmetric nor symmetric, the military simply said that they had to take at least 20 thousand citizens a month, and the master plan for the 24th year was not provided mainly by the commander of the armed forces of ukraine, this problem grew in the summer, both at the pond and in the parliament at planning... of the 20-24 budget, we asked what to plan for, how you see the war, tell me, these are the public reproaches that are now being heard against zaluzhnyi, from the mouth