approve all this, at the parliamentary level already sign at the highest level, let's say, here - arakhamidmitted that boris johnson came and banned continue these negotiations and stop the fighting, yuri, what do you think about this ? well, the fact is that i met arakhamia in the twenty-first year, then i remember him as a very cunning, prudent politician, well, let’s just say that he originally came to ukraine, he was a migrant, that is, he is not a representative of ukrainian nationality, although he we are an international society, but still in ukrainian society they ask questions, why are everyone except ukrainians in key positions, even the recent minister of defense umerov, this is also not ukrainian, well, that’s what i say, and then, as a result of communication, i saw how cunning and calculating he was. he violated all the agreements that we discussed, and after that i was also banned from entering ukraine for 3 years. after that, after i left and came again for another meeting with him, i was also surprised by their luxurious way of life, if i may, yes, andrey, i’ll literally d

think that rahamia is a stupid person, then that’s it, conviction, self-hypnosis, we remember how arakhamihouted that a storm had happened, so we are stopping the negotiation process, that is , now it turns out, he admits, then , that it was already obvious to us what butch was and why it was needed, and i would like to return, based on these words, to what our president has said since the beginning of the war, because he said absolutely the same thing as our president and belarus did in order for negotiations to take place here between russia and ukraine, they took place, the president was privy to these negotiations, as we know from before and more than once he has already said that it was not a problem to come to an agreement and agreed, and then a command came to ban these negotiations, everything started again, one conclusion from this, unfortunately, is the price of loss of sovereignty, if the ukrainian government at the moment when it began was already independent, if it thought about national interests of the country, at least there was some sovereignty, even a little, at least 30%

direct a participant in these negotiations, who now heads the zelensky faction in parliament, david arakhamiukrainian delegation in istanbul, he said in a recent interview, yes, we were ready for everything, we practically agreed. and now he said something like, in retrospect, i understand that there was a lot to gain for us, but boris johnson came and said, no, let ’s fight again, everyone knows that, we talked about it many times, but now the ukrainians themselves have admitted it and admitted it, so far we haven't seen any, any gna. we don’t see either from kiev or from its owners that they are ready to move on to the political process ; moreover, zelensky signed a special decree a year and a half ago, which prohibits negotiating with the putin government, so that this is a judicial matter, he is not going to cancel it, and if you listen to what they are talking about, and what all the secretaries general and nato and the european union are saying, they say only one thing, that we are obliged to support ukraine, because if ukraine tolerates defeat, then it will be a defeat for the entire

arakhami’s interview with this fragment, that johnson is to blame for everything from the point of view quite a long time, which is also absolutely correct, and the military propaganda of ukraine, supervised by the british , is extremely effective, this must also be recognized, which makes this interview arakhami , indeed, it means i don’t feel sorry for johnson at all. there is such a technique in military propaganda. when, through some information stuffing, you either shape public opinion in the direction you want, or you study it on the 1+1 tv channel on which this interview was aired, well, to put it mildly, it is not a democratic tv channel, such tv channels do not exist in ukraine now, everyone works there under zelsky, under the rule of kiev, respectively, if this interview ends up in the media, it is necessary to say that arakhamia came out and honestly admitted, this is impossible in the regime of military propaganda, this is being done for something, arakhamia says: we could sign some kind of peace treaty, then the kiev regime is beginning to film the reaction of its populatio

specify, but after the sensational revelations of the head of the servant of the people faction, david arakhamilready knows about this. ukraine was prohibited from signing the istanbul agreements by former british prime minister boris johnson. another half a million lives under the gun. these are the consequences of his words. let's just fight. natalya solovyova, lead. the flag of the dpr and russia flies over the city mariupol, but i wasn’t in the frame, when we went out onto the upper street, two soldiers were running, who was older, i said, i ’m older, they were looking at the girl, well, they were surprised , they were shooting, yes, yes, women were in the zone svo serve directly on the front line, now a section of the area will be opened. in fact , it's very motivating when a girl is next to you in the trenches, great i wish, great, hi, hi, brother, i had to show in practice that i can not only do girly things. we will take on this matter, it will be honest detective.

arakhamy , well, they will give it with ballots, the voters have already given their answer in poland too, because it just became known that the new coalition in the polish sejm voted for the candidacy of the leader of the communities of the civil coalition, donald tusk , for... the position of prime minister prime minister of poland, with the return of tusk, what can ukraine expect, mr. yevgeny? i think that donald tusk, who really was the record holder for being in the prime minister's chair, he was almost seven years, is not just returning to big politics, but returning to enough difficult conditions. and the tusk principle will come , bring order, in this case it will not work, and i would not get too excited in my hopes that tusk will work in the interests of ukraine and exclusively in the interests of ukraine, will immediately deal with the problems of ukrainian grain, crossing borders motorists, etc. no it is not. tusk will primarily deal with problems. which are related to poland, the polish economy, polish social policy, polish development, this is his task as prime minister,

direct participant in these negotiations, who now heads the zelsky faction in parliament, david arakhamiinian delegation, he said in a recent interview: yes, we were ready for everything, practically, we agreed, but he came boris johnson from... said, no, let's fight some more, we still don't see any, any signals, either from kiev or from its owners, that they are ready to switch to political the process, in order to start the political process, it takes two, like in tango, but the guys on the other side, they don’t dance tango, they don’t dance breakdancing. what remains outside the brackets are 8 years of shelling of donbass by the ukrainian army and the decision of crimea to become part of russia after the bloody coup in kiev in february 2014, and the zelsky regime, which inherited all the habits of the organizers of the maidan, now exists on the western promise to support ukraine in its struggle for as long as necessary , or until the last ukrainian. as for the struggle for the existence of the osce, at least the word security is a big question. kiril brainin led bees. zulfiya khakim

direct participant in these negotiations, who now heads the zelsky faction in parliament , david arakhamisaid, no, let's fight some more, we still, neither from kiev nor from its owners, say that they are ready to move on to the political process, in order to start the political process, it takes two, as in tango , but the guys on the other side, they don’t dance tango, they have to be a soloist, this whole dance revolves around russian specialization. and outside of the brackets remain 8 years of shelling of donbass by the ukrainian army, and the decision of crimea to become part of russia after the bloody coup in kiev in february 2014, and the zelsky regime, which has inherited all the habits of the organizers of the maidan, now exists on the western promise to support ukraine in its struggle for as long as it takes, or until the last ukrainian. as for the struggle for the existence of the osce, at least the words security and cooperation in this abbreviation remained a big question mark even after the meeting in the spear. kiril brainin, pavel pchelkin, zulfiya khakimova and dmitry lit

arakhami , and even now connected to this because he wants to live and be useful to the west, these areision in the fall of twenty- two. on the admission of new territories to the russian federation, this decision put a severe stop on all these conversations about returning to minsk, istanbul and so on. at this moment, as we say, new territorial conditions arose, yes, which make agreements based on road maps and series impossible, and then somehow, we will do this, we will do that, the decision on ukraine’s refusal to join nato is a fake, even if we achieved it today, we would sign 100-500 pieces of paper, for 100,500 the first day, after that, they would have told us, you know, guys, this is the sovereign right of ukraine, they have the right to violate these pieces of paper, they want to join, they want not to join, as they tell us , there was no expansion, they themselves wanted it, but we, the organization, cannot refuse, therefore, with these swindlers and cheaters, any agreements on the principle of road maps, we do something on then, they don’t work, only an agreement on the prin

announced our figures for 24-25, i avoided a direct answer, but judging by the revelations of david arakhamig of twenty-two, it was great britain, its prime minister, who disrupted the signing of a peace treaty with moscow. moreover, when we returned from istanbul, boris johnson came to kiev and said: “we will not sign anything with them at all.” i will only add that after april 15, when the preliminary text of the peace treaty was ready , not only boris johnson came to kiev, but also the main hosts, as far as i remember the head of the us state department, the chief of the pentagon, and also rahami asan admitted that some kind of group of foreign advisers had been formed. who actually advised zelensky not to sign the peace treaty, thus the chance to end the war was missed, i am deeply convinced that if kiev had signed the peace treaty then on mutually acceptable terms, he would have thereby saved the lives of hundreds of thousands of his soldiers, but zelensky chose war, something is happening in the west and inside the ukrainian regime, first recognition by the arahs, now an unexpected bre

following the revelations of a negotiator in belovezhskaya pushcha, verkhovna rada deputy david arakhamia. he was also then in the group of ukrainian negotiators in istanbul in the spring of 2022. and in his address he said. that at that time ukraine and russia were one step away from ending the war. at that moment i was in the group of ukrainian negotiators. we discussed with the russian delegation for almost 2 months, march and april, a possible agreement on a peaceful settlement between ukraine and russia, and we, as you remember, concluded the so-called istanbul communication. and at the end of april we were very close to ending the war with some kind of peace settlement. for some reason it was postponed. it was putin’s personal decision to accept the text of this communication, which was completely far from the original proposal presented to the ukrainian delegation in minsk. we managed to find a very real compromise. putin really wanted to reach a peaceful settlement with ukraine, this is very important to remember. oh, how yes, here right away, of course, in ukraine they began to

kremlin propaganda has now been publicly confirmed by the faithful zelsky's comrade-in-arms, david arakhamich is the best thing for them on the right, so that we are prepared to end the war, which we take, as finland, if there is neutrality there, we must go to war, which we do not we will join before nato. especially for agent galkin, rahamiya confirms that zelsky staged the provocation in the riot on the orders of boris johnson in order to disrupt the results of the negotiations in istanbul and continue the war. if we turned from istanbul, boris johnson came to kiev and said that we were in love, we will not sign anything with them and let’s just fight if the cream of high society merged in silence, no one would throw a stone in their garden, but foreign agent galkin supported zelsky's bloody performance in bucha, it was a stab in the back for all of us. russia is to blame for so many terrible things, and at the same time it says that it is not to blame. this is a certain cohort of neo, ouds. in general, i call this term for myself the birth of new incarnations of little judases. i'm tryi

information field is to always assume that our opponents are doing everything wrong, interview with arakhamint, that johnson is to blame for everything, from the point of view of military propaganda in which ukraine lives quite a long time ago, which is also absolutely correct, and the military propaganda of ukraine, supervised by the british, is extremely effective. this, too, must be admitted, which makes this interview an arah, indeed, it means that we don’t feel sorry for johnson at all, but there is such a technique in military propaganda, when through some kind of informational stuffing you either shape public opinion in the direction you want, or you study it, yeah, the 1+1 tv channel, on which this interview was aired, well, to put it mildly, it’s not a democratic tv channel, there are no such tv channels on ukraine does not exist now, everyone works there under zelsky, under the rule of kiev, accordingly, this interview ends up in the media, it is necessary to say that arakhamia came out and honestly admitted, this is impossible in the regime of military propaganda, this is it being

well, that very group of foreign advisers, which, according to arakhami , was formed, so it forbade,is agreement, as a result, the chance to end the hostilities on mutually acceptable terms was lost by the leadership of ukraine, russia lost its part of the promise began to carry out immediately after the completion of negotiations in istanbul, on march 30 , troops were withdrawn from kiev, and thirty in the ssu entered bucha. western newspapers, news sites, and television channels rushed to accuse russia of the mass extermination of civilians. by declaring a riot, the ukrainian country actually disrupted the agreements already reached. former adviser to the us president, feona hill , published an article in which she claims that a draft peace agreement, ready for signing, was on biden’s desk, but it was american. the president vetoed. if then the russian side agreed to preserve both ukraine and its ruling regime with some correction of foreign and domestic policy, but now everything will be different. in fact, biden and johnson simply killed ukraine in its current form. the ukrainian

the need to end the ukrainian battle, and ukrainian journalists, after a scandalous interview with arakhamiian delegation in negotiations with russia in 22, are wondering how justified the losses suffered by ukraine are because of the missed chance for peace. nikita korzun about why the west is convincing kiev to continue to fight, without even thinking... it took the north atlantic alliance a year and a half and hundreds of thousands of dead ukrainians to recognize russia’s obvious strategic defeat impossible to inflict, the goals of hope associated with the ukrainian counter-offensive have been nullified, because since its start there have been no serious changes on the battlefield and no breakthrough, many people here admitted this, quietly with caution, but they admitted that the backroom snoops of the ministerial summit have not yet mean capitulation, but they serve as symptoms of disappointment for sure; confirmation is easy to find in the official statement of the secretary general of the alliance, which calls for further efforts to strengthen military support for ukraine. we know th

supervised by the british, is extremely effective, this must also be admitted, which makes this interview arakhami not at all sorry. there is a method of military propaganda when, through some kind of informational stuffing, you either form public opinion in your own way or study it, yeah, tv channel 1.1, on which this interview was aired, well, to put it mildly, it is not a democratic tv channel, there are no such tv channels in ukraine now exists, everyone works there under zelsky. under the rule of kyiv, accordingly, if this interview ends up in the media, it is necessary to say that arakhamia came out and honestly admitted, this is impossible in the regime of military propaganda, this is being done for something, arakhamia says: we could sign some kind of peace treaty, then the kiev regime begins to film the reaction of its population, its army, how they feel about this, what they will say, what they will say regarding the possibility of signing a peace treaty now, while simultaneously forming one among their own. listen, maybe we'll have to make a peace treaty still sign, because in the same

arakhami, if we translate his words into a publicly accessible language , what about dignity, for theey are told, but what about sovereignty, it turns out that johnson arrived and crossed out all the efforts of hope , yes it turns out, but what about sovereignty then, in general, these are the issues that the ukrainian rear was absolutely strong helped the front, now something has broken in the rear, now to tehran, which means that what happened in tehran absolutely does not correspond to what could be a fundamental difference now, because in tigeran indeed, many colleagues have already said this, they gathered allies who had no illusions left that it was possible to come to an agreement with the enemy, that it was precisely to tehran that it became clear that the enemy had to be finished off, because by that time on our front there was already not only stalingrad, but the battle of kursk, well, that’s it we won’t be on the front either by july, but mussolini was not there, italy had already left the war , 500,000 allies were fighting in italy, that is, this is factual. anyway, it’s a

ears, in the ukrainian media, among ukrainian government officials, the mayor of kiev, there david arakhaming about whether this is not a certain provocation of a new russian offensive, that is, what picture, what picture very briefly , the ponies pretend that they are wounded and some birds are doing there, which here raises particular suspicion that they it’s not just pretending that they have problems, they really have problems, it’s obvious to everyone, their counter-offensive has failed. but they do, in a sense, this company says that they are not just wounded, but very seriously wounded, supposedly as if on their last legs, but if we look at the state of the front for the last time... in this theory of yours, some kind of provocative conspiracy, it turns out that there are a lot of participants in this conspiracy, they all work for one specific, different organizations, or maybe some -the number of these people would not have blurted out at some point that this is a story to lure, no one knows how to hold their tongue , and separately in ukraine no one knows how to hold it, i don’t th

of millions of people have left the country, which means a lot of people are fighting, what does arakhamihey will vote, that means those who are abroad say the figure is 6 million, those who are at the front, he says this from the point of view of procedures, but this is necessary according to -others understand, they really don’t understand, or rather, they they understand how 6 million will vote, just 6 million will vote for zelensky , will not vote for zelsky, who is abroad, after that rhetoric, after the rhetoric that the kiev authorities officially said about them, that they are traitors, that they are not... yes, please, well, i beg you, if you don’t know the facts, study, i know, okay, how will these 6 million vote, then how will the military vote, really, how will they vote? who they support, zelsky or zaluzhny, so they understand perfectly well that serious people sit there, as if at least enemies, but there are serious people there, they take a calculator and count simply electorally, and even if zelensky wins in this situation after all the manipulations and machinations, zelen