designing and creating -- stuart: yeah, and you end up with immediate yo i don't careli don't care arelity next guest was on track to become the next ceo of levis, you know, the jeans peoplesome but schoen -- then she spoke up about school closures. she was offered a million bucks to stop talking about the issue, she turned it down so she could speak freely. jennifer sey is with me now. first off, jennifer, congratulations on doing the right thing, in my personal opinion. how tell me how -- now tell me how the woke mob took over levis. >> i think it's happening more broadly than just at levis. business is always as it has been, it's about making money. and that's okay. and anyone who challenges the narrative that business is in it to change the world and to drive a social justice point of view and to protect people and save people, anyone if who challenges that narrative is banished. can that's what happened to me. but, you know, if i could offer some real facts here -- stuart: please. >> you know, levis has aggressively taken these social justice stances. ceos across the country want to b

without a doubt the racial stereotypes that come into play arel, and even though it was thr music videoand they were in control they had to battle a whole other set of issues that are. >> but it is a similar thing going on in that video that goes on in this book. am i in control? i'm leaning into it and maybe that's a form of empowerment. i think she does that, cardi b.. >> it's interesting because you had feminist and right-wing people people posting this video is. and when does that happen in this country? >> they come together and it's heartwarming.de >> yes. >> my question was how did you deal with the heartache and the feelings of rejection especially from an industry that is so quick to reject women? >> yeah. i think this is something you might hear me say this again because it was one of the takeaways for writing the book. i i wrote it around the experiences i had a lot of shame around. i thought i would look back at the book and say that's the moment. at the moment i shouldup than something different or why would you compromise yourself in this way and why would you agree to do

the people of northern ireland - this debate is not whether we know the people of northern ireland arele people of northern ireland are suffering. we all know they- the people of northern ireland are suffering. we all know they are, l the people of northern ireland are| suffering. we all know they are, as a resutt— suffering. we all know they are, as a result of— suffering. we all know they are, as a result of no— suffering. we all know they are, as a result of no institutions - suffering. we all know they are, as a result of no institutions here. - suffering. we all know they are, as a result of no institutions here. it i a result of no institutions here. it is not _ a result of no institutions here. it is not whether— a result of no institutions here. it is not whether we _ a result of no institutions here. it is not whether we know - a result of no institutions here. it is not whether we know that - a result of no institutions here. it is not whether we know that our. is not whether we know that our public _ is not whether we know that our public finances _ is not whether we know tha

mean, the amount of issuance is down so dramatically, so it's price in that even though -- those arelism kind of earnings, and i think it's pricing in some credit erosion that i don't think we're really going see yet, so, you know, i've thought this for a while i've been wrong, the stock was much higher, but eight times, three dividends, the stock seems to trade down every time they report regardless of how good or bad it is. >> right. >> i'm long. staying long i have a bigger position in bank of america but i'm definitely long bank. >> i agree here, and i do want to look at the banks as an opportunity, and they are so cheap right now. yes, they have -- we would have said that had a while ago and they have gotten cheaper the banks do tend to be the companies that go down the hardest as we're going into recession but also as things are improving, they also tend to be ones that improve the move so if are you of a mindset here that some of this is getting priced in, and i do think we're close to if not there on the bank earnings, then i do think that this can be an opportunity over the long

and we need to destigmatize mental illness, acknowledgee hoe that homeless people arele homeless because rents are too high, because property is too high. b it's because you're sick. and rather thaecausen pretendine it's something else other thanl they need to be into the hospitl and locked up rather than on the street. of o just one more thing as proof ofo that. if you go through the listug of people who have been assaulted t in new york , michelle, go pushed on the subway tracks, mentally ill person danielntalli enriquez shot on the q train, worked at goldman sachodriguezso mentally ill person, and petern. zipless, who killed alison kil russo, the lieutenant. he was transported tol by the hospital by her unit. wow. in 2018 for making anti asian online threats. he has taken to the hospital, probably committed for seventy two hours, but right back out on the street to kill her, you need to, they need to be locked up and medicated. >> and so the entire public is safe indeed. all right. dana: ahead, russian president vladimir putin escalating his warrussia with ue and the west. >> wlatest

a long way.like it's the same like, you know, three percent of people in these neighborhoods that arel we committing 100% of the crime.th and until weat focus on that, you're still going to have like this crime wave. >> speaking of smokers, when you because you you're coveringt the news and stuff, we hear this a lot on the right. this is like a big talking any point. whenever you talk to any politician running for office, the first thing they'll bring up to talk about education, they'll talk about crime. you' and're noarine not hearingm the left. and you would think that thid te would be a lateral thing whenl we all want to be safe. to be i don't care how you vote , but we all want to be able to walk down the street and argue aboutr our our political picks or whatever . why is there such a disconnect between the two sides when i mean, it's the proof is literally in the pudding? backell,puddin you know, i thinn many ways it goes back to whateg happened in george floyder and the backlash that happened after that horrific killing offy of george floyd was this sort of mass criticism of pol

ing ou but for the moment, what we arel seeing in general, when i have a new poll in arizona coming outtomorrow, so i can't put the my hand on that. but in general, what we'rein t seeing are the republican candidates in all of these states hanging in there, even gg against incredible attacks like herschel walker has taker examp wiorgia, for example, herschel walker, i think robert conway has his own poll right nowa very showing herschel's within three or four points. ins is becoming a very interesting thing. yeah, even less of that. let me just say one other thing. these gubernatorial candidates in states like florida , 'r with the santurce, georgia, with kepp, they're running evenm stronger. and it tells me that. something's going on . there is a new wave developingt. . whether it will hold, yo u don'twin't know. but it's certainly beginning tkw develotentiop. ia and a lot of attention has beenhersh paid to georgia and herschelalke walkerr.. cas but we're laying out a case against raphael warnock that the people of georgia not really heard robert haley when aley find out that he used h

. >> while i've been very blessedn to find an amazing schoo arel, the children are our future. how do w acstop the indoctrination of our children across the country and ensure the future generations uphold the values our great nation was built on ? >> so thank you, sergeant. it's neither the government or the school's job to raise children. >> it's they're there to teacheo parents, raise children, strong families, raise children. ch and that's what we need to be supporting. il. from our role. vernme i don't wantnt the federal government involved in our schools. i don't want the federal threatening our schools. i don't wantt wa the federalnt government, government holdingen leverage over the head otf the federal government wants to help pay for school lunches. >> yeah, that'hoolnes fine.strig bus t don't put strings attached oyke they're doing now, which is if you don't let boys plas yy against girls in sports , we'rea going to take away your school lunch money. >> i'm against that.yo we shoulurmoney. that.uld al we should always be against that. and that's what we should be doi

becatson hasbecause the civil re commission has ruled, has determined that the people arel unschooled illllegal aliens, unskilled illegal aliens or black and browegs,n people livig in the inner city with high school education or less. donaonald trump did all those things too black people. if things for black people, yet het was called a racist. if he's a racist, he neegod to go back to racism. school ba. >> one more one more quickmore k thing, john . bernie sanders has chastisedrtyf his party and told him to focus on the economy. al sharpton has chastised his party and told them to focuss c hid tole tnon crime when a selfd democrat, socialis a self-t and america's preeminent racerai card hustlers are the voice of reason for the democratic party, that party is in deep, deep voodoo. >> i think you'r.e right. i mean, the human 2016. in 2016, trump went into the detroit in in minority communities. what do you have to lose? whve me a chance and let me say right now that remarkable. >> i think about that. yeah. what have you got to lose? becausthey haven't fe they haves big for 50 years, th

in the plans we've already put forward we arel we've already put forward we are clear where we wish toow for day—to—day expenditure. we have a completely different economic philosophy as to how growth happens but also how you pay for things, we don't agree with borrowing money for tax cuts and it is the fiscal rules that will win out and apply. that is the rule set _ that will win out and apply. that is the rule set by _ that will win out and apply. that is the rule set by your— that will win out and apply. that is the rule set by your shadow - the rule set by your shadow chancellor where you will not spend money on the day—to—day stuff by borrowing in order to do it. taste money on the day-to-day stuff by borrowing in order to do it. we will borrowing in order to do it. we will borrow to invest _ borrowing in order to do it. we will borrow to invest as _ borrowing in order to do it. we will borrow to invest as part _ borrowing in order to do it. we will borrow to invest as part of - borrowing in order to do it. we will borrow to invest as part of our - borrow to invest as part of our

they arel fail, it is always hollow. they are as had _ fail, it is always hollow.t is always hollow. they are as bad as each other, _ fail, it is always hollow. they are as bad as each other, it - fail, it is always hollow. they are as bad as each other, it is - fail, it is always hollow. they are as bad as each other, it is a - fail, it is always hollow. they are| as bad as each other, it is a pit of vipers _ vipers. if- vipers. i if there vipers. - if there was an vipers. — if there was an election tomorrow, how would you vote? honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given— honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it — honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it a — honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it a lot— honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it a lot of— honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it a lot of thought. - honestly, i'm not sure, i haven't given it a lot of thought. there l honestly, i'm not sure, i haven'tj given it a lot of thought. there is 'ust given it a lot of thought. there is just so— given it a lot of thought. there is just so much— given