_ and people i have worked with would argue for— and people i have worked with would argue for the need, one session — argue for the need for repeat dose, one session is not going to be sufficient, so for someone with depression who has suffered for many year. _ depression who has suffered for many year. they— depression who has suffered for many year, they have one session, they depression— year, they have one session, they depression usually tends to go away for a few— depression usually tends to go away for a few months, slowly starts to return _ for a few months, slowly starts to return because often they are returning _ return because often they are returning to conditions, societal condition— returning to conditions, societal condition that distributed to the —— contributed — condition that distributed to the —— contributed to the depression in the first place. — contributed to the depression in the first place, they need to work on those _ first place, they need to work on those condition, but we also need tom _ those condition, but we also need to... ., , ., , those condition, b

value is even greater— argue that that symbolic value is even greater than— argue that that symbolicrinsic value — even greater than the intrinsic value of— even greater than the intrinsic value of the _ even greater than the intrinsic value of the stones _ even greater than the intrinsic. value of the stones themselves, which _ value of the stones themselves, which are — value of the stones themselves, which are spectacular. _ value of the stones themselves, which are spectacular. so - value of the stones themselves, which are spectacular. so i - value of the stones themselves, which are spectacular.— value of the stones themselves, which are spectacular. so i have had the chance recently _ which are spectacular. so i have had the chance recently to _ which are spectacular. so i have had the chance recently to try _ which are spectacular. so i have had the chance recently to try on - which are spectacular. so i have had the chance recently to try on a - the chance recently to try on a tiara _ the chance recently to try on a tiara and — the chance recently to try on a tiara and it _

that is why mr erdogan argues that — weeks ago. that is why mr erdogan argues that i _ weeks ago.i have _ weeks ago. that is why mr erdogan argues that i have their _ weeks ago. that is why mr erdogan argues that i have their majority i weeks ago. that is why mr erdogan argues that i have their majority in | argues that i have their majority in the parliament, i should be the president, and i will bring stability to the country. bear in mind turkey is going through a very serious cost of living crisis last year with inflation at record highs of over 80%, that was a high of more than two decades. we are talking about the aftermath of two very devastating earthquake that killed over 50,000 people. and mr erdogan presents himself as this powerful figure who can steer turkey out of this crisis state, and his supporters believe that he is actually the man to follow. but critics say that mr erdogan is probably the reason why turkey is in such a crisis, given his unorthodox economic policies for instance, with what he is doing with the inflation rates, the interest rates, and mr mr kilic

can i argue that some of my work is in there somewhere? all right, and let's take a moment to listen to some other concerns from sam yang. he is a digital artist in canada, who found that a i models had been trained on images of his work and were generating new works of art in his style. not only is the collection of copyrighted content of legal concern, but so is this, when a like to innovations are made to look like an artist work. this has the potential for reputation damage for forgery, for fraud, for identity theft. and what's most concerning is that when these models are trained on the images of the artwork, they are unable to forget. so almost all of these models are now working with tainted data through generations. now all involve copyrighted content which has been gathered without the knowledge or permission of the copyright owner. it is directly hurting artists with put their passion and their soul and everything though they create totally for their work to be scrape from the internet and without their permission and used in tra

, many would argue there are _ certainly for those, many would argue there are potential- argue theres who are declared and running. — candidates who are declared and running. they— candidates who are declared and running, they will— candidates who are declared and running, they will likely - candidates who are declared and running, they will likely point i running, they will likely point to these _ running, they will likely point to these ten— running, they will likely point to these ten events - running, they will likely point to these ten events and i running, they will likely point| to these ten events and make the argument _ to these ten events and make the argument that _ to these ten events and make the argument that former i the argument that former president _ the argument that former president trump - the argument that former president trump may- the argument that former president trump may not| the argument that former i president trump may not be as selectable _ president trump may not be as selectable given _ president trump may not be as selectable given these - presiden

argue with that and i can't argue with that and i can't argue with that.eken— communism we've taken we've feken fn— communism we've taken we've feken fn ereo— communism we've taken we've feken fn ekeo e— communism we've taken we've taken in also a lot— communism we've taken we've taken in also a lot from ukraine as taken in also a lot from ukraine ee of— taken in also a lot from ukraine ee of frene— taken in also a lot from ukraine as of france, germany and many fn foxeno— as of france, germany and many fn rokeno .— as of france, germany and many more in poland . poland already more in poland. poland already neo— more in poland. poland already nee 2— more in poland. poland already had 2 million— more in poland. poland already had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going fo— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going to greece— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going to greece later this week. fnere-e— going to greece later this week. fnere-e e— going to greece later this week. there's a million— going to greece later this week. there's a m

i would argue there _ atmosphere is down there. i would argue there is _ atmosphere is down there.is down there. i would argue there is no better place i atmosphere is down there. i would argue there is no better place in i argue there is no better place in the entire world right now if you are a fan of the entire world right now if you are a fa ., ., , the entire world right now if you areafa ., ., , are a fan of not 'ust your vision but music — are a fan of not 'ust your vision but music in — are a fan of notjust your vision but music in general— are a fan of notjust your vision but music in general because l are a fan of notjust your vision l but music in general because all are a fan of notjust your vision i but music in general because all the speak there have been like performances, live gigs, dj sets, acts from eurovision past and present on stage here at the eurovision fan village and then has been free, no tickets required. let's speak to some of the fan. hello? cheering. iwant let's speak to some of the fan. hello? cheering. i want to ask you a question. i know it is hard

argue with that and i can't argue with that and i can't argue with that.feben— communism we've taken we've feben fn— communism we've taken we've feben fn ereo— communism we've taken we've feben fn ebeo e— communism we've taken we've taken in also a lot— communism we've taken we've taken in also a lot from ukraine as taken in also a lot from ukraine ee of— taken in also a lot from ukraine ee of frene— taken in also a lot from ukraine as of france, germany and many fn robeno— as of france, germany and many fn robeno .— as of france, germany and many more in poland . poland already more in poland. poland already neo— more in poland. poland already nee 2— more in poland. poland already had 2 million— more in poland. poland already had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going fo— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going to greece— had 2 million ukrainians. i'm going to greece later this week. fnere-e— going to greece later this week. fnere-e e— going to greece later this week. there's a million— going to greece later this week. there's a

jpmorgan argues the pain trade is higher as debt resolution means traders return to macro fundamentals where earnings are holding up, consumers are strong and leverages are near all-time low. let's bring in mike santoli. it's a confusioning picture when it comes to making a market call right now with the fed and the economy giving mixed signals. >> and i think there's low conviction on both sides of the trade. the market is acting more like the jpmorgan scenario, which is really just about people not being positioned for less than bad news and, therefore, feeling maybe you have to participate. and to your point, sara, if you were loaded up with a bear case and you say not only is the economy falling away quickly, but we might basically have to have the fed cut, emergency measures, credit seizing up. it hasn't all really come together if the debt ceiling was part of that, you had them removed from the case over the course of the last few days. it might just be an excuse to get people nice and loaded up and fully exposed to stocks once we get to the top end of this range. carl, you menti

democrats are for their part have argued that social benefit programs already have work requirements in place and addin more to that is simply unnecessary. as you pointed out president biden's top advisers are spending the weekend at camp david. >> with regard to the debt limit , things are looking good and very optimistic. i hope will have evidence tonight for--we have adl's very close and optimistic. >> the clock has struck 12 at n deal to speak of yet. also tonight the deputy treasur secretary said the administration has ruled out attempting to use the 14th amendment to prevent the us fro defaulting on its debt obligations. as pointed out, the clock is still ticking. it's yet no deal. >> as you pointed out, it is passed to the 12:00 o'clock our president biden mentioned. let's continue the conversation about the looming default deadline with tonight's piano a heritage foundation ej and tony in the dean of pepperdine university school of public policy great to have you both here tonight. let me start with you. always it strikes me in these moments you see a president going off to c

and i would argue that historians of conservatism have often listened to the respectable voices of the elite media or intellectuals. instead of the voices of the enraged populace despite the greater reach of the latter. and the more highbrow quality newspapers may have influenced opinion leaders, but hurst mccormick in the patterson's shape the views of millions of ordinary americans. this was a very dangerous moment in world history as hitler built up as military invaded as neighbors and started a world war. yet at this dangerous moment these press barons work together to minimize the fascist threat. their divisive politics and sometimes hateful messages have entering appeal the last of the press lords died more than a half century ago, but there are errors in the right-wing media. still continue this crusade for america first. so that is where i will end it and i'm happy to take your questions. and if you have questions step up to the microphone, yeah. thank you. john harbath the retired from university of pittsburgh. i have a question with what's going on now with. right-wing media

and so that's sort of what historians argue in popular memory. it's often a little bit less complicated. you know, if you pick up a popular history of the american revolution or watch a film about the american revolution, you're likely to encounter a narrative that presents the heroic revolutionaries rising against the oppressions of the villainous british right. and tonight, i want to offer a different way of thinking about the coming of the american revolution, one that focuses on how information mobilizes the political behavior of ordinary. and a lot of the argument about what brought about the american revolution comes down, really, i think, to what you what you think about a much broader question, which is why do people engage in politics in the first place? i think it's a good question. politics, after all, is is very inconvenient. i have a three month old at home. and i can tell you just getting out the door to vote on tuesday was was quite a challenge. we've all got busy lives. it's not you know, it's very pleasant. it's annoying even to

i would argue that china needs to be fit, and that is not going to stop. that's probably a good thing for brazil. the united states has played a very important role in the brazilian economy in the value added sphere. matching brazilian companies to global supply chains and to working with resilient companies to build the technological capacity to create the agricultural revolution to build out the automobile industry and there's a lot more that can and should be done there. as the u.s. considers its industrial policy he needs to look beyond our immediate borders and frontiers in look for partners who have the universities and laboratories and industrial capacity and workforce necessary to begin to ensure that our supply chains are in a secure zone, a secure region. i think brazil complete a very important role there. argentina and chile and a number of other countries. in a perfect world i would like to imagine an office light without the submarines. if you look at all costs -- aucus the submarines get the attention. the australian industry and and if it i

so i would argue that the united states was not entirely clueless about. some of the major events and pressures and demands at the time. so not the clueless decade. maybe it was the best decade ever, the best decade ever. this was a characterized nation that appeared in a new york times commentary published in 2015 that made this claim. the nineties were the best decade ever and it noted that the nineties were a time of prosperity in the united states. after a very sharp early in the decade recession. the american economy grew an average of 4% a year after 1992 to 9099. 4% a year is pretty strong. economic growth. the median household income in the country grew by 10% during the decade. stocks quadrupled value and the commentary noted that peace, prosperity and order and american culture vibrant, healthy. during the 1990s, the best decade ever. of course, there are some arguments to be raised against this tempting characterization. tempting to look back steeped in nostalgia to say the nineties were the best ever, the best decade ever. it is, though, a high

i mean, and we can argue about this. i would venture to argue that it's not just the democratic part of that, it's across the board. if you're a politician in america, if you own a media company in america, even i dare say if you are supposedly a journalist in america, you're probably corrupted right now. and it bothers me to say that because, you know, we're supposed to set the example. let's take a break. i don't want you to stop. i, i want to get back in your head on a couple of other things or including something you mentioned earlier about how politicians start with a certain amount of money and end up with a heck of a lot more by the way, i have a pod cast where as a journalist, as latino, as an entrepreneur, i share my story, is what i've learned what i've not learned. usually i've learned a heck of a lot more from my mistakes and i have from anything else called the rick sanchez podcast. we talked about a lot of stuff including with garland and are talking about right here right now. look for it. wherever you get

we've argued it for many years. it's got— argued it for many years.eason why it's right, i ii-s— the reason why it's right, i mean, it's not— the reason why it's right, i mean, it's not merely that we wont— mean, it's not merely that we wont young— mean, it's not merely that we want young people to be poiiiisoiw— want young people to be politically engaged, but we're isooning— politically engaged, but we're becoming older— politically engaged, but we're becoming older as a society . becoming older as a society. iioiiw— becoming older as a society. iioiiw insrs-s— becoming older as a society. motty there's a— becoming older as a society. motty there's a much heavier wsigni— motty there's a much heavier wsigni on— motty there's a much heavier wsigni on ins— motty there's a much heavier weight on the opinions of older psonis— weight on the opinions of older people wno— weight on the opinions of older people who, naturally enough, wont— people who, naturally enough, woni io — people who, naturally enough, woni io snsno— people who, naturally enough, want

for more government, reagan argued for less. a few years later when barack obama was elected president, peter baker, writing in the "new york times", said the president obama seemed to be any direct dialogue with ronald reagan, that obama was arguing for more government and responding to reagan's famous comment that in this present crisis, government is a problem, government is not the solution. so you can draw a line between fdr in 1933 arguing for more government, the new deal as a solution, the ronald reagan in 1981,, and then to barack obama in 2008 responding to that. it is because of the importance of the ideas enunciated in the speech that there are two different books about the reagan administration and reagan's time, one by very conservative scholar, and one by very liberal scholar, but have the age of reagan in their title. there is simply no question that beginning in 1980 there's an argument that reagan had begun to get these ideas across to the nation before 1980, that what reagan said in his inaugural address chang

what i argue is that this would have been impossible five years ago. it marked a huge change.is a traditional superpower that had commercial space totally turned against it in ways it clearly did not expect or underestimated. and, you had a company like spacex that had really risen to the power of a nationstate. there was a period of time when elon wanted to turn starling off. he was upset people were not paying for it. he written to turn it off and the ukrainian government freaked out, u.s. government freaked out. he turned it back on. if he decided not to, there was nothing any government could do to replicate it. they have nowhere near the number of satellites that spacex does. susan: that really raises questions about the power that lies in the hands of private companies. right now it seems they are on the side of the good guys in this war, in future scenarios, it might not be the same outcome. how does the world governments protect themselves against this enormous power? ashlee: i want people to be aware of this new reality. it is not very different from a lot of things o

arguing for more government.ew deal as the solution to ronald reagan in 1981 and then to barack obama in 2000 date responding to that. it is because of the importance of the ideas enunciated in this speech that there are two different books about the reagan administration at reagan's time. one by a very conservative scholar and one by a very liberal scholar that has the age of' reagan and their title. simply no question that beginning in 1980, there is an argument that reagan had begun to get these ideas across as a nation before 1980. what reagan said in this inaugural address changed american politics and moved it in a different direction until obama and then again intel trump tookpe a very different perspective. so, for example, writing in 2006, new york calls a hundred columnists conservative argued that the view that less government equals more freedom, government is the problem organizing principle of the day. writing for the new republican talking about how reagan ideas came unassailable dominant in politi

though this spacex rocket was small and not all obvious where this was heading, it was a success as i argue in the book, it finally opened people's minds to what was possible. maybe they could also do something like this. unlocks these decades of latent enthusiasm to try to do something new. susan: your book is titled "when the heavens went on sale”. what is the line of demarcation between old space and what you describe as new space? ashlee: yeah. if you look at the spacex rocket, it is a pretty good example. it is this idea of having a clean slate to try new things. i argue that we would have this explosion of activity and success of the 1960's and 1970's, where things have gotten white stuck. nassau, military contractors really just bill rockets the same way. they largely build satellites the same way. we have this advantage of huge advances in materials and electronics. a lot of it comes down to cost. with this clean slate, people like space x and other companies started building things cheaper, faster. the satellites came with much more capabilities than they had in the past. it was br

by the way, i mean, and we can argue about this, i would venture to argue that it's not just the democratic party that it's across the board. if you're a politician in america, if you own a media company in america, even i dare say if you are supposedly a journalist in america, you're probably corrupted right now. and it bothers me to say that because, you know, we're supposed to set the example. let's take a break. i don't want you to stop. i want to get back in your head on a couple of other things or including something you mentioned earlier about how politicians start with a certain amount of money and end up with a heck of a lot more by the way, i have a pod cast where as a journalist, as latino as an entrepreneur, i share my story, is what i've learned what i'm not learn. usually i've learned a heck of a lot more from my mistakes and i have from anything else called the rick sanchez podcast. we talked about a lot of stuff including with garland and are talking about right here right now. look for it wherever you get your podcast when we come back. so how's a guy in garland just mentio

for more government and reagan argued for less.ew years later when barack obama was elected president, peter baker writing in the new york times said president obama seems tose be in direct dialogue with ronald t reagan, obama was arguing for more government and responding to reagan's famous cv comment in this present crisis government is the problem, not the solution. you can draw a line between fdr in 1933 arguing for more government new deal as a solution to ronald reagan in 1981 and barack obama in 2008 responding to that. it is because of the importance and ideas in this speech there are two different books about the reagan administration and reagan's time and liberal scholar that has reagan in the title. simply no question beginning in 1980 an argument he began to get these ideas across as a nation but what reagan said changed american politics and moved it in different direction until obama and again until trump took a very different perspective. for example in 2006, new york times columnist conservative less government equa

but i would argue that christopher wray would be second. today there's a weaponization of government committee going on this morning. where there are whistleblowers testify, f.b.i. whistleblowers testifying who had their security clearances taken away even though they have whistleblower status. not only is christopher wray weaponizing the faib against american citizens, he's also weaponizing it against actual employees of the f.b.i. employees that are doing their job and are coming forward bravely to tri-to tell the truth about the things that are happening within the f.b.i. that is extremely concerning about what's happening. also it was just announced in the news sometime this week that the f.b.i. and i believe it's christopher wray himself is asking a judge to keep a laptop by a d.n.c. staffer, what was that guy's name? trying to recall his name. seth rich. they're trying to hold that from the public for 66 years. like what is there to hide? these are the kinds of things that shouldn't happen. christopher wray does his job as the f.b.i.

he argues it needs we got with the stroke of the pen. governor gavin newsom officially signed this executive order into law. >> creating a strike team to identify environmental infrastructure and transit projects across the state held up due to california's strict environmental review and permitting process. specifically. he wants to see reform to the california environmental quality act, more commonly known as c qua, according to his office. it generally requires state and local governments to inform decision-makers and the public about the potential environmental impacts of proposed projects. the goal is to reduce those environmental impacts to the highest extent possible. touring this patterson construction site one day set to be home to a solar battery storage facility expected to generate enough power for 60,000 homes per year. newsom said he agrees with sequel in principle but argues lawsuit in a lengthy permitting process have long delay. key projects similar to this one across the state. >> sometimes putting them behind schedule

we've argued it for many years. it's got— argued it for many years.ight, i ii-s— the reason why it's right, i mean, it's not— the reason why it's right, i mean, it's not merely that we wani— mean, it's not merely that we wont young— mean, it's not merely that we want young people to be poiiiieoiiw— want young people to be politically engaged, but we're ieooning— politically engaged, but we're becoming older— politically engaged, but we're becoming older as a society . becoming older as a society. iioiiw— becoming older as a society. iioiiw inene-s— becoming older as a society. motty there's a— becoming older as a society. motty there's a much heavier weigni— motty there's a much heavier weigni on— motty there's a much heavier weigni on ine— motty there's a much heavier weight on the opinions of older peonie— weight on the opinions of older peogie wno— weight on the opinions of older people who, naturally enough, wani— people who, naturally enough, woni io — people who, naturally enough, woni to spend— people who, naturally enough, want to spend money

so i finally get to argue the case i was i was single the time, although i was dating carolyn, i was single at the time and. i had a big house, rented house in and everybody the team played in the house played basketball and we worked on this brief together. so we argue the case and it's i'm given a half an hour for my main argument, 10 minutes for rebuttal. and it's the first case on television, first live appeal ever on. so people are watching it all over. and i do my first 15 minutes. i think i did a really job. who knows? i didn't know for. and then the state gets up and does its job and you know, i was happy and and i had 15 minutes. so i get up and i say, mate, you know, please. the court i had my 15 minutes of rebuttal. in rebuttal was always the important part of the case. you get the last word. suddenly i feel a hand on rear end down my belt. like, you know, like today it would be sexual harassment. it's susan estrich saying, sit the f down. you won the case. shut up. and i listened to her and i said, you know, haltingly with her hand still there, your honor, as if you have

you're arguing for the coach here. you know, what about this?uld be sacked, ok? this was just an accident, and i used to work for a judge who would say everything in life is either a crime or a competencible event and as -- competencable event. as i've gotten older, i realized that was accurate. this was really just an accident and regardless of where the coach was standing -- let's assume he was standing in the wrong place -- the referee still owed a duty of care to the coach and everybody around him. football is an inherently dangerous sport so very simply, the referee should have watched where he was going because, you know, it's kind of like when you're driving and you might have the right-of-way but if someone hits you, invariably someone, the insurance company, the police, someone will say you didn't do enough to prevent that accident and you were also negligent so i think that -- also considering the injuries, the fact he was able to finish the game and he didn't have those injuries that he needed hospitalization for until after, i'm not

sir keir will also argue that the nhs needs inree— also argue that the nhs needs inree nig— also arguetal to community and— analogue to digital hospital to community and sickness, to nrereniien— community and sickness, to nrereniien .— community and sickness, to prevention . and— community and sickness, to prevention . and the prince of prevention. and the prince of wires— prevention. and the prince of wires nes— prevention. and the prince of wales has joined— prevention. and the prince of wales has joined royal navy submariners_ wales has joined royal navy submariners preparing to take on a transatlantic— submariners preparing to take on a transatlantic rowing enniienee.— a transatlantic rowing challenge. the duke of cambridge reieesei— challenge. the duke of cambridge reieesei e— challenge. the duke of cambridge released a video— challenge. the duke of cambridge released a video of— challenge. the duke of cambridge released a video of his visit to a released a video of his visit to eireining— released a video of his visit to a training session— released a video of his visit to a trai