lie to ourselves by believing that netanyahu is the bad guy here, and forget about golem mayor, ariel sharoneud olmerch and all those who have been here, we can't believe that in the united states the problem is biden or donald trump, camilla harris is another sign." ronald reagan was one of them, killinton is one of them and so on. so to believe that there will be a difference if the democratic party comes to power is nonsynical. what i mean is that a dialogue that doesn't address the real underlying problems and not just cosmetic issue is not going to guarantee peace. and hamas is not absolutely clear about this. hamas has already made proposals. they are on the table and they are disrespected. they are not taken to account, they are rejected. well, if what they want to do is a peace according to israel's agenda, it is actually attempt to try to win at the table what they have not been. what do you think about the sympathy that's been generated among american students and partly among the american people as well for the palestinian cause? how will this influence the presidential elections b

lie to ourselves by believing that netanyahu is the bad guy here, and forget about golem mayor, ariel sharon and all those who have been..." ronald reagan was one of them, killinton is one of them and so on. so to believe that there will be a difference if the democratic party comes to power is non-cynical. what i mean is that a dialogue that doesn't address the real underlying problems and not just cosmetic issue is not going to guarantee peace and hamas is not absolutely. venerated among american students and partly among the american people as well for the palestinian cause. how will this influence the presidential elections between komela harris? and what's his name? donald trump? bueno, exactamente. well, exactly, the first thing that should be mentioned is that it definitely has an influence, but it scope will be very limited, because unfortunately, the vast majority of the people in the united states are very poorly informed and bet on theories that are science theories. i applaud and i'm pleased, i'm happy to see that their anti'. science sectors in the territory of what we call isra

lie to ourselves by believing that netanyahu is the bad guy here, and forget about golam mayor, ariel sharond olmart and all those who have been here, we can't believe that in the united states the problem is biden or donald trump, camilla harris is another zienist, ronald reagan was one of them, killinton is one of them and so on, so to believe that there will be a difference if the democratic party comes to power, it is non-cynical, what i mean is that a dialogue that doesn't address the real underlying problems and not just cosmetic issues, not going to guarantee peace, and hamas is not absolutely clear about this, hamas has already made proposals, they are on the table and they are disrespected, they are not taken to account, they are rejected, well, if what they want to do is a peace according to israel's agenda, it is actually attempt. generated among american students and partly among the american people as well for the palestinian cause. how will this influence the presidential elections between komela harris and what's his name? donald trump? exactamente. well, exactly. the first th

lie to ourselves by believing that netanyahu is the bad guy here, and forget about golem mayor, ariel sharonolmart and all those who have been here. we can't believe that in the united states, the problem is biden or donald trump. camilla harris is another zienist, ronald reagan. was one of them, killinton is one of them and so on, so to believe that there will be a difference if the democratic party comes to power, it is noncynical. what i mean is that a dialogue that doesn't address the real underlying problems and not just cosmetic issues is not going to guarantee peace, and hamas is not absolutely clear about this, hamas has already made proposals, they're on the table and they are disrespected, they are not taken to... account, they are rejected. well, if what they want to do is a peace according to israel's agenda, it is actually attempt to try to win at the table what they have not been able to win on the battlefield. that should be mentioned is that it definitely has an influence, but it scope will be very limited, because unfortunately the vast majority of the people in the united s

there's no, there is no, there's no question about that, and it's as as as brian was saying, this is ariel sharon said, grab some hills, what you do, what the first thing we do, grab some hills, all right, you want towering heights on which to murder the indigenous population, and we're sitting here, both of us in the us, slaughtered by various means up to... 500 million indigenous inhabitants and took their land and made a country out of it. this is not and and that sleezy talk about intention, non-intention, we didn't mean it, you see that, and you see it, you see it, um, in the us political narrative, it's unbelievable, we're the best side of this, under killer uh camala harris said, um, well we're going to give them everything they want because they have to... to defend themselves and then we're going to rebuild palestine, the bizarro world, absolutely insane way of talking of anti-logic that these these people have constantly used to redefine truth, intent, it's a ridiculous concept even catch you in, it's like a lawyer arguing you out of a traffic ticket, it's like you have to stop, listen,

ariel sharon , minister of war of the zionist regime, it is true that at the same time he announced that with the occupation of lebanon, we will go to jordan and the persian gulf after the occupation of lebanon and capture the oil wells of the persian gulf, and then the oil will no longer be an arab oil but a jewish oil. then he pointed out that no force it cannot stop the advance of the israeli tank columns. i said this so that we can understand the greatness of the work of hezbollah and the islamic material and mr. nasrallah's level. why did mr. arya sharom say this? because in all the wars he had with the arabs and israel, he was able to use propaganda and psychological operations and the media. tell the arab countries that israel is an invincible army. and the heads of the arab regimes have come to believe that they cannot stand up to the zionist regime, because this regime quadrupled its occupied territories in 6 days in 1967, that is, in the war with egypt, syria, jordan and until the borders of iraq and lebanon are correct , that is, the syrian golan was taken, and the rest of pal

there's no there is no there's no question about that and it's as as brian was saying this is ariel sharone said grab some hills what you do what the first thing we do grab some hills all right you want towering heights on which to murder the indigenous population and we're sitting here both of us in the us slaughtered by various means up to 500 million indigenous inhabitants and took their land and made a country out of it. this is not and and that sleezy talk about intention, non-intention, we didn't mean it, you see that, and you see it, you see it, in the us political narrative, it's unbelievable, we are the best side of this under killer uh camala harris said um, well we're going to give them everything they want because they have to defend themselves. and then we're gonna rebuild palestine, the bizarro world, absolutely insane way of talking of anti-logic that these these people have constantly used to redefine truth, intent, it's a ridiculous concept even catch you in, it's like a lawyer arguing you out of a traffic ticket, it's like you you have to stop, listen, i'm not listening to

i was on here a few days ago and i mentioned most you die on and ariel sharon, warmer your leaders of, of israel is really defensive and then ministers, they were both big on this idea is, is rarely deterrence motion. diane, so that is real needs to be seen by its enemies as a mad dog ariel sharon's at the fear of us is our greatest weapon. so the more they can strike the more they can attack and more they can play off ends. they figure the more likely the likely it is that people in the region will be scared of them and will not want to attack them. now, i don't necessarily agree with that perspective or philosophy historically that is actually lead to more acts of resistance against against israel. but um, that's certainly one of their, their objectives. they have multiple options for sure. ground and vision is one. i think that's very unlikely. i think most of that talk is probably a fake out. and we've noticed that as soon as they started talking about the possibility of a ground invasion, then they struck from the air. another possibility is that they just continue to distract fr

in 1982, ariel sharon's plan to drive the palestine liberation organisation out of lebanon succeeded.hezbollah, a tougher, better—disciplined organisation with the strongest possible links to iran. after israel's invasion of lebanon in 2006, intended to destroy hezbollah, the organisation instead became even stronger and far more effective than the lebanese army or the lebanese government. and it still is, despite all the events of the last few weeks. so, what might the long—term consequences of a new israeli invasion be? well, the one thing we know is that the lives of even more civilians will be wrecked. "please, get out of harm's way," mr netanyahu says to ordinary lebanese people. but we've seen in gaza how horribly difficult that is to manage. well, that's it from the first episode of this new series of unspun world. thank you forjoining me and the unspun team. and, until we meet again, goodbye. hello there. saturday's sunny skies will gradually be eroded by cloud and then wind and rain for many as we close out sunday. yes, it's going to gradually turn wet and windy, particularly

and then ariel sharon, unilaterally withdrew from guys. and that created a new, a new dime and he didn't do it. you did it unilaterally. it didn't work with the palestinians in, in arranging a new state as, as he did as um, you know, what or withdrawal. and that, that ultimately allow home us to come to power and so, so these, obviously the palestinians are a frustrated ended but, but it also there, they have to deal with the real circumstances. so that's where they, they need the international support, lots of money, and start re developing the region. and then hopefully finding these are some of the finding a resolution resolving some of the issues that they, that you're right with. you know, they're not gonna get ahold or land back, but what, what can accomplish, come from it. what can the compromise with that you mentioned before your vision of a palestinian consideration which could be bad to buy for an or our financial assistance with international peacekeeping forces on the border with israel. and you argue that such a posting in co

last 75 years, most of them have been terrorists, whether it was ben gurin, manakin began. or or ariel sharon, they were all terrorists, in fact some of them killed british soldiers in the mandated palestine at this time, and therefore the zionist entity and his ordinary people, we call them ordinary people, but majority of them are not even civilians because they have served in the idf in one way or another during their life, therefore all of them support what the zionist entity is doing, whether netanyahu, what i like to call the nasty, narcissist netanyahu, even if he is removed from power, the same thing will continue under some other leadership, so really we have no hope, so long as this radicalized, talmudic, terrorist control the zionist entity, there has to be complete. de-radicalization of the zionist movement and those who are jews, genuine jews, they can live very happily in palestine, but not the zionist who have been in inflicting genocide for the last 75, 76 years in the territories that they have occupied and continue to occupy. thank you for your initial thoughts, shabir and..

the last century, but i remember it very, very vividly that that was a sign of what at that time ariel sharon and the israelis were capable of, so they they've shown their genocidal tendencies consistently since the number and arguably before that with the stern gang and ergon and all of these terrorists that existed, so there are a nation like the americans who are born of genocide, they're born in genocidal tradition, the native america. things and and slavery uh trade gives you all the evidence you require for that statement that i've made, nation which is born in that kind of blood lust and then is encouraged to maintain that blood lust and then celebrates its military across its cultural um you know landscape and allows the pentagon to fund uh bollywood movies upon movie and uh to celebrate their kind of violence around the world and their imperialism and at the same time stereotypes and villifies muslims, creates uh hatred for the other, and simultaneously also drives news narratives which constantly pump. about hatred for the other, the migrant issue for instance in america or the west

. —— ariel sharon. say iran tends to enjoy strategic patience, well israel can do deliver a fast and decisive blow early in the campaign. i expect iran will take its time, regroup, and have an aversion to a direct war with israel, and it will use the various sponsors in the region to perhaps by hezbollah time in lebanon and try to regroup. in the calculation from the point of view of iran, what influence will be strikes, for example, on yemen, that we've seenin example, on yemen, that we've seen in the last couple of hours make? —— what influence will the strikes may? hours make? -- what influence will the strikes may?— will the strikes may? clearly, the significance _ will the strikes may? clearly, the significance of— will the strikes may? clearly, the significance of that - will the strikes may? clearly, the significance of that is - the significance of that is that israeli prime minister never knew he was trying to undermine iran's so—called ring of fire around israel. iran understands that it is no

list of line of presidents before, and if someone does try to go against that, i mean back when ariel sharon was president and condeliza r was working on the bush, he humiliated her and said um, essentially it doesn't matter what you say in this conference or in this speech coming up, because i spoke to your superiors and uh, we've decided what's going to happen, so he removed any importance of what she has to say, and essentially he's at the point where he's doing that now to the us, saying, what you say as a government, president or otherwise, is nail void and does not carry any weight. all right, thank you for that. let me bring in bring in julia cassam, she's a moscow journalist and political analyst and as... julia, how she looks at the things that have been happening in the past few days in terms of the israely recent aggression against lebanon? yeah, um, it's basically israel is just committing the same stupid mistakes that it has in previous years of its aggression, um, at the very beginning of the aggression, the zinis entity said that anybody... remaining in their homes, their own

that's a direct quote. ariel sharon, former prime minister, said something somewhere he said, the main weapon does that, does a quote, he said, israel's main weapon is quote, the fear of us. so in many ways, i think this attack is designed to sort of instill fear, not only has the law in lebanon, but also uh, 2 other elements. let's say in the, in this axis of, of resistance and young men in iran, in the palestinian territories, both in gaza and, uh, and the westbank has the law. and all of these members, the members of this excess of resistance, know very well that israel has this very sophisticated technology and surveillance infrastructure. it's one of the best in the world, if not the best in the world. they've been warning his beloved fighters against using cell phones. mobile phones hung us about blocking mount a few months ago and said anyone who's caught using a mobile phone near the battlefield will be kicked out of his below. so they know this very, very well, increasingly over the past few months has belies been using couriers so, so they knew that devices any devices could

that i thought of when i, when i got news of this was israel's larger deterrence, the strategy ariel sharon, the former prime minister of israel describe this as israel's greatest weapon, he talked about quote, the fear of us moshi, diane, former is really a military leader talked about how it was necessary that israel's enemies see it as a quote mad dog. so they carry out these very provocative attacks to instill fear, in their enemies, not just against military targets, but against civilian targets. so we could talk about if there's time, the delphi, a doctor in which calls for maximum or damage to be inflicted to civilians and civilian areas. we could talk about, you know, the 100 to one ratio where they allow all kinds of collateral damage, right? so called collateral damage to, to civilians, right? if they, if they identify a military commander or someone, a high level, the kills on policies or all kinds of policies. all of them are designed to not just win a sort of tactical battle, but to instill fear in their enemies so that no one basically messes with israel. so that was the 1st t

criminal, but so was ben gourian, so was every single authority in the zianist regime, so was ariel sharon, there were all blood blood thirsty genocidal criminals, they all murdered babies, they all murdered women, they all raped, they all did the most unspeakable things right, but this is what it is is that people are starting to understand the main source of all this colonialism, the main source of all this illegal is really occupation, they are starting to understand this is where the settlers are coming from, so they're going back to the origin. leaders of imperialist, you know, of imperialism, and the us, the uk, france, of course, the biggest support is the us, but they have learned so much during this genocide on how actually it was a british mandate, that actually it was the british that did this to them, so when you go further back to the source, then you know where to attack, and it's very interesting, because you know, what we saw last night was there were lot of iraqis trying to take over the american embassy. in iraq, and this is probably i think this is the the biggest embass

when i resigned from ariel sharon's government can i couldn't agree with that policy so i resigned as finance minister. i said to him in the resignation letter, i said, at least you should stay in the philadelphia corridor because otherwise this is going to become hamastan. which it did. and i documented but before that,, too. now you talk about this more, right? we had a lot of discussions in security meetings about the philadelphia corridor, about the smuggling. what do we do about it? because the only way to deal with it really was to conquer gaza. but we know we didn't have need of the domestic legitimacy nor the international legitimacy to do it. look how much problems we have now after the worst savagery that was delivered to the jewish people since the holocaust and we still have, look at all the questions you're asking me. the international pressure that is put on israel. so certainly we didn't have legitimacy before the october 7 massacre. so what we did was basically attack hamas every time, attack it again and again and again, i as prime minister led three of these operatio

plesner is president of the israel democracy institute and a former aide to both prime ministers ariel sharon benjamin netanyahu. give us a sense of what the mood is like in israel today. you had a to mulch was 36 hours. yohanan: it is a very emotional period, the fact that six of our hostages have been murdered in cold blood in just 24 hours before the idf soldiers have actually reached them, it was received as a major blow for all israelis and the protests that erupted have reflected that. we have to understand, we have to be able to hold two complex thoughts at the same time. on the one hand, we are dealing with a murderous hamas jihadist regime that has wanted and continues to desire to annihilate our state and to execute our hostages, and they have not said yes to any deal, to any mediation, to any of the parameters, so israelis are in this respect united behind the more goals of dismantling hamas and bringing back the hostages. at the same time, a growing number of israelis that perhaps a majority of israelis do not trust the way the prime minister is conducting and carrying out this wa

. >> the first is that as the minister ariel sharon government during the disengagement of 2005 when israel evacuated gaza he, mr. netanyahu twice voted for this road to stay under egyptian control. >> secondly, he's been prime minister since 2009. what has he done in terms of the philadelphi corridor that he's promising to do now, this is 2009 is 15 years ago and or 16 years ago so i don't think anyone takes him seriously. on the other hand, on the other hand, what he's not budging. he is adamant that we should you should stay there he is not doing a good job in explaining to the average israeli why this has any strings just important and he knows. >> and that's, that's probably the most compelling and important things bill. >> he knows that through his speech tonight statements turned into a speech. he basically he basically i'm sorry condemned more hostages to their dad the idea of the diplomatic plan or strategy to kind of say, this is it lasts proposal, best proposal that u.s. >> officials have been discussing with their counterparts do you see that as doomed to fail at this poi

broader invasion to go back in history a little bit back in 1982, then israeli defense minister ariel sharon told the israeli cabinet which told the americans that israel would launch a limited incursion into lebanon. they ended up of besieging western beirut. so people here, remember what has happened in the past the fear is that the kind of destruction and massive display displacement with over 1 million people being having to flee from their homes this is a result of the bombing, could really just be the beginning the fear is that if the israelis make a sizable incursion really pushed into the south, that you could have even more people heading elsewhere. similar to what we saw in 2000 six. this country is bankrupt, it's simply is not capable of handling those kinds of numbers. now, as far as how is his butler going to react? act we don't know at this point, we did hear naim qassim whose the way senior deputy to the late hassan nasrallah saying that hezbollah has not collapsed. that despite the pain and the sacrifices he said that they would continue to confront the israelis in support of

and then ariel sharon, unilaterally withdrew from guys. and that created a new, a new dime and he didn't do it. you did it even a lateral. you didn't work with the palestinians in, in arranging a new state as, as he did is um, you know, what the withdrawal and that, that ultimately allow home us to come to power. and so, so these obviously the palestinians are, are frustrated and there but, but it also there, they have to deal with the real circumstances. so that's where they, they need the international support, lots of money and start re developing the region. and then hopefully finding these are some of the binding rental, resolving some of the issues that they, that you're right with. you know, they're not going to get ahold or land back. but what, what can accomplish, come from it. what can the compromise was that you mentioned before your vision of a palestinian consideration, which couldn't be bad by for an or our financial assistance with international peacekeeping forces on the border with israel. and you argue that such a palesti

in 1982, ariel sharon's plan to drive the palestine liberation organisation out of lebanon succeeded.effective than the lebanese army or the lebanese government. and it still is, despite all the events of the last few weeks. so, what might the long—term consequences of a new israeli invasion be? well, the one thing we know is that the lives of even more civilians will be wrecked. "please, get out of harm's way," mr netanyahu says to ordinary lebanese people. but we've seen in gaza how horribly difficult that is to manage. well, that's it from the first episode of this new series of unspun world. thank you forjoining me and the unspun team. and, until we meet again, goodbye. good morning, welcome to breakfast with nina warhurst and charlie stayt. our headlines today: explosions, screaming fresh strikes are under way in southern beirut, as israel says it is targeting buildings which store weapons belonging to hezbollah. it follows earlier blasts which killed at least six people and injured 91, targeting the leader of hezbollah — it's not yet clear if he is alive. mohamed al fayed's son