what does this decision mean for the people of arizona?it's a huge victory but not only a victory for the people of arizona, it's a victory for people across the united states. the fact is that many states including arizona are passing voter id-type provisions and today the supreme court today that when it comes to registering a vote particularly when using a federal form, you cannot apply additional burns or on -- obstacles in front of those voters. and it's a big victory for everyone when it comes to exer vising our right to vote. >> michael: this is a really really important issue, as we saw in 2012 so it's a really exciting day for the country. the "new york times" reported some disturbing numbers about prop 200. over that same period arizona rejeblthed 31,550 voter registrations. these kinds of laws clearly target immigrants and minority groups. how do they tie into the ongoing immigration debate we're experiencing in the country right now. >> prop 200 was based on fear, fear that undocumented that reside currently in our country are

controversial ley en arizona que requeriria a los votantes demostrar que son ciudadanos... las repercusiones de este fallo.. la corte suprema le dio un golpe a leyes estatales que pretenden que votantes prueben su ciudadania antes de registrarse. en 1 decision de 7-2, el maximo tribunal del pais rechazo una ley estatal de arizona, conocida como la proposicion 200, que requeria comprobar la ciudadania y que rechazo a 30 mil potenciales votantes. segun la asociacion nacional de funcionarios electos latinos, naleo, el fallo de la corte sera una advertencia para otros estados que quieran aprobar leyes similares. max sevillia, naleo y esto pasa a dejar aviso al resto de los estados que han copiado lo que trato de arizona de que lo que han hecho es invalido, que viola la constitucion de estados unidos e impide el voto de minorias, en particular el voto latino. la corte ordeno que los estados deben aceptar y utilizar una forma federal de inscripcion electoral que no requiere prueba de ciudadania. es 1 victoria importante indica 1 organizacion que defiende el derecho al voto. kathe

el freno, el n el nopciero mÁximo tribunal del paÍs dijo que arizona no puede exigir pruebas de ciudadanÍaa hora de votareo, la tarjeta de registro de votante es suficiente, la decisiÓn de la corte de la proposiciÓn 200 de arizona sienta un precedente, como dice lourdes es una victoria para los que argumentaron que era un mecanismo para evitar el voto de las minorÍas. >>> la corte suprema aboliÓ la proposiciÓn 200 de arizona que niega la inscripciÓn para votar a los a los que no pueden probar la ciudadanÍa, en un voto de 7 a 2, los magistrados dijeron que la ley nacional de registros de votantes de 1993 tenÍa precedencia y esta permite la inscripciÓn para votar por un formulario sencillo que se firma garantizando que se es ciudadano bajo pena pe perjurio, lo dijo el juez que deben aceptar la formula, la ley prohÍbe a arizona exigir a un solicitante que presente informaciÓn adicional, en arizona fue una victoria para los que lucharon contra la propuesta del 2004 que los votantes aprobaron. >>> era un obstÁculo para los votantes de arizona, y en especÍfico para los hispanos. >>> hoy tenemos

tal, los titulares, 17 de junio del 2013 la corte suprema de justicia aboliÓ la proposiciÓn 200 de arizonagaba la oportunidad de votar a los que no demostraran la ciudadanÍa de manera que lo exigÍan, las tiendas 7 eleven estÁn en el ojo del huracan, algun algunos empleadores explotan a indocumentados, en chicago muertos y heridos, como la reforma migratoria favorecerÁ al paÍs econÓmicamente, asÍ comenzamos. >>> este es su "noticiero univisiÓn" edicion nocturna con ilia calderÓn y enrique acevedo. >>> hola quÉ tal, buenas noches, la corte suprema de justicia tomÓ una decision que favorece a minorÍas de votantes en estados unidos. cuando rechazÓ la llamada proposiciÓn 200 de arizona, que pretendÍa exigir que a la hora de votar los ciudadanos lo eran, los estados no pueden exigir pruebas que van mÁs alla de lo establecido a nivel federal, dulce recogiÓ reacciones en arizona. >>> los voluntarios de la organizaciÓn promotora del voto mi familia vota recorren por arizona informando a votantes de la decisiÓn que tomo la corte suprema de estados unidos. >>> es una victoria para los votantes en ari

arizona has gone too far. the context of the federal laws, they think the supreme court got it right. >> maybe so. monica, in new jersey, they need proof i can vote, i show a license with my name and image from a much thinner period, but in other words, it is me. and what is so wrong about that? regardless of what's going on with federal law, new jersey just wants to make sure, my town and my state, that i can vote. >> right, neil. and let's look at this from a very basic position. arizona has two issues it wanted to deal with, illegal immigration and voter fraud. wasn't trying to step all over the federal government or cause any kind of problems. it was looking for a solution to help it with our state's problems, the voter fraud and illegal immigration. all arizona wanted to do was just add one more requirement on top of the federal form that all you have to do is sign it under oath. they just wanted you to show some type of identification, whether it is a passport, a birth certificate. >> i don't know why th

. >> woodruff: then, the supreme court ruled arizona may not require proof of citizenship in order to vote. marcia coyle breaks down the decision. >> ifill: ray suarez continues our series inside immigration reform. tonight, we debate the "e- verify" system to check workers' eligibility. >> woodruff: we look at the surprise result in iran's presidential election, and what they could mean for its nuclear program and relations with the u.s. >> ifill: hari sreenivasan gets the latest on the war in the states over whether to expand medicaid under president obama's health care law. >> woodruff: and paul solman closes with a conversation with the author of a new book, "who owns the future?," which poses a provocative way to think of our digital lives. >> the government should have to pay for whatever it does, including getting information from people, and should be constrained by its budget. so if they have to pay for collecting those images of you walking around, then they have to create a sense of balance about how often they do it. >> woodruff: that's all ahead on tonight's newshour. >>

reinhart is with the "arizona republic." and karen kasler is with ohio public radio. so, mary k. reinhart, what did governor brewer have to do and why did she did it now? >> well, she had to get a bipartisan coalition of her republican-led legislature to go along with what she's announced at the beginning ever the session in january that was a top priority. that was expanding medicaid. it was a surprise, stunned observers we were one states to sue to stop obamacare and the governor needed to get this coalition behind her, she put these folks together. when negotiations stalled the governor called a surprise special session, just 48 hours this bipartisan coalition in the house and senate pushed through medicaid expansion, got her to where she is today signing that bill. >> she still doesn't admit this is in support of obamacare. >> she admits that this tiny little piece she supports. it's the law of the land, the election certainly was conclusive with the re-election of president obama, the supreme court made its decision and she was trying to convince for last five months opponen

the court said then the arizona law conflicted with federal immigration law. and while the court now is reining in arizona's efforts to crack down on voting by illegal immigrants, it did leave the door open just a bit. the court said arizona could go to a federal commission and ask it to change that form and, scott, it's also emphasizing that states still have substantial power to set voting requirements. >> pelley: jan crawford on the steps of the supreme court. thank you, jan. in another courtroom today, federal prosecutors hope to send boston mobster whitey bulger to prison for the rest of his life. he's on trial for 19 murders. but an old hit man testified today that he believes bulger is guilty of something worse than murder. elaine quijano is following the trial in boston. >> reporter: john martorano testified he was james "whitey" bulger's chief executioner and best friend. but that loyalty evaporated, martorano said, when he learned bulger was a government informant. martorano was perhaps the most feared member of bulger's winter hill gang. the crew ru

how and why did medicaid expansion happen in arizona? >> well, i think it's really just a simple matter of economics. i think jan brewer looked at what was being offered by the federal government and saw that you couldn't turn down that money. it was just too much money to turn down. it did too much good for too many people. and at the end of the day, she had a working coalition that we formed with some moderate republicans and we all stepped up to the plate and drew the line in the sand and said we're going to get this done. >> it's easy to say that because the math is clear, but that did not persuade a huge chunk of your republican colleagues in both houses, and she had to essentially go to war with them. i mean, were you surprised at all with the vehemence with which she pursued this goal? >> no. i think anybody who has been following arizona politics for the past four or five years knows jan brewer and myself have not been the best of political friends and if there's anybody in the state that's probably fought harder against her, i d

es ciudadano bajo pena pe perjurio, lo dijo el juez que deben aceptar la formula, la ley prohÍbe a arizonaexigir a un solicitante que presente informaciÓn adicional, en arizona fue una victoria para los que lucharon contra la propuesta del 2004 que los votantes aprobaron. >>> era un obstÁculo para los votantes de arizona, y en especÍfico para los hispanos. >>> hoy tenemos la oportunidad de registrar a mÁs gente de lo que hicimos antes. >>> impide la discriminaciÓn contra el latino y minorÍas a los que se dificulta presentar documentaciÓn adicional para inscribirse dice. >>> esta decisiÓn es critica para el futuro del voto latino en arizona, no solamente eso, su repercusiÓn llega a otros estados que han pasado leyes similares. >>> el fallo de la corte suprema afecta a ahora labama, georgia, kansas city, y tennessee, y docenas de estados interesados en imitarlos. >>> el que presentÓ la demanda inicial a nombres de votantes de arizona, la ley impidiÓ que mÁs de 31 mil se inscribieran para votar en maricopa la inscripciÓn cayÓ en un 44%. >>> la corte suprema dejÓ abierta una puerta. >>> sin em

so the case comes out of arizona and as you know, arizona likes to pass all of these restrictive rulesitizenship and immigration. and so what arizona had done was say okay, we understand that congress has set federal form for everyone to use to register which was intended to streamline the voter registration process allow more people access to easy registration so that we can really try to include as many people as possible in democratic participation. seems a worthy goal. >> bill: the motor voter act. >> arizona said okay. we know that the federal statute says you must use this form but we don't like that you only have to swear under penalty of perjury that you're a u.s. citizen. we want you to actually attach proof. and so what was for the supreme court -- before the supreme court was if arizona's additional requirement of proof of citizenship conflicted with the federal law that said no, you just use this one form and that form doesn't require you attach anything to show you're a citizen. you just have to swear under penalty of perjury. >> bill: and the court ruled? >> the court rul

>> hey, arizona. >> hey. wasn't expecting you back so soon. >> yeah, we can, uh, see that. >> we thought you would be further than this. >> me too. >> phew. >> are these your workers? >> yep. >> you got to be kidding me. >> look. for $4,000, i could've had a full crew, but for $932... >> and 16 cents. >> ...you get uncle toot and ferguson. >> okay, wait. do you even have a license? >> no, but ferguson is driving. >> honey, we need to get rid of him, and we need to get someone else in here. >> baby, we already paid them a deposit. we might as well let them do the job and get out of here. >> did he touch you? >> no, he, um... >> did he pinch you? >> oh, goodness, he pinches, too? >> uncle toot, how many times do i have to tell you that no means no? >> [ crying ] >> arizona, i think ferguson is crying. >> ferguson, what is wrong with you?! fine. you can go to lunch today. go. >> arizona, you got to get to cracking. you haven't done anything. i mean, the outlets, the faucet, the grout. >> hey, i apologize. those

the court did strike down arizona's proof of citizenship law.ams is live outside the supreme court. what does this decision come to? >> reporter: this is a prop 200 from arizona which established that anybody who wants to vote in a federal election in arizona has to bring proof of citizenship in order to vote. that is in conflict of the federal motor voter law which has a form that you register and check a box. arizona imposed an additional requirement and said if you are a naturalized citizen you have to show proof of naturalization. a number of groups sued and said one of the problems is you are not allowed to make a copy so you can't register by mail. today the supreme court said arizona couldn't do this. what the supreme court did say. this was a 7-2 decision, what the supreme court said is if arizona really felt strongly about this then it could ask the people that draw up what is on the form to change it for arizona. if the feds won't do it then arizona can go back to court. this is important for this reason. very few states do what arizon

. >>> saliÓ de la cÁrcel a su hogar en arizona chltd >>> muchas gracias a todos, especialmente a mi diosijos >>> estas son las primeras declaraciones que yadira maldonado luego de salir de nogales sonora mÉxico. y su esposo gary que con un fuerte abrazo la espera al salir de penal poniendo fin a una odisea que no quiere volver a vivir. y >>> estoy un poco nerviosa. no sÉ, un poco traumada no fecha >>> luego de ser acusada de trafico de drogas por autoridades mexicanas, al encontrar 12 libras de marihuana debajo de su asiento cuando viajaba de sean la a su casa en arizona. sostuvo ser inocente y despuÉs de pasar 9 dÍas tras las rejas en el cereso femenil hoy es una mujer libre. al faltar evidencia que transportaba la droga y gracias al video de vigilancia. . ahÍ bordÓ el camion solo con su bolsa y 2 cobijas. >>> estoy en casa me sentÍ en lo caluroso de los americanos. me trataron muy bien al pasar. >>> esta madrugada cruzÓ los estados unidos inmediatamente despuÉs de salir del penal para reunirse con su familia, en good year arizona. donde radica con su esposo y 7 hijos. le causa otro dil

applied before they said no it's not but arizona went forward with it anyway while lawsuits were going on schoolies says go ahead do it again and then if you don't like the outcome appeal it to administrative panel and then you can appeal it from there and it may even get back here right and then we can take another bite of that that's the process i'll go through another another one of the big cases had to do with if if you are arrested and the officer says did you commit this crime and you don't answer you can now that can now be held against you in a court of law as if as if you had said yes i did commit the crime well no we the jury can still determine whether or not your silence means what it means whether means it's points towards guilt or innocence depending on circumstances do questions whether or not it's admissible whether or not you're not answering that question is you asserting your right to remain does sign doesn't the fifth amendment explicitly say that you can't be forced to testify against yourself but the courts have said that in order to assert that if you're in a non

>> the supreme court strikes down arizona's controversial law. >> this is a prop 200 from arizona. >> requiring voters to show proof of citizenship. >> that's in conflict with the federal motor voter law. >> the high court this morning has handed down five decisions -- >> we have 14 more opinions coming down. >> the justices are holding back. >> we'll get decisions again on thursday. >> on marriage equality, voting rights, and affirmative action. >> i think we can relate this back to education. >> last night's miss usa pageant. >> what's going on with these pageants? >> the topic, equal pay for women in the workplace. >> i think we can relate this back to education. >> really the only other format where this happens are political debates. >> if you let me talk about education. >> education, blah, blah, blah. >> really it goes back to education. >> education, blah, blah, blah. >> are these questions really that important? >> it's time to let it go. >> it's just as important as the others. >> ha, ha, ha, ha. >> swimsuit! eveningwear. talent! poise! >>> good evening. i'm alex wagner in f

. >>> la comunidad inmigrante de arizona creÓ su organizaciones de vigilancia utilizando la tecnologÍaos de los agentes del orden de arpacio, contra inmigrantes indocumentados. dulce mascarreÑo habla de una aplicaciÓn de telÉfono para que se descargue en los celulares. >>> salvador dirige un comitÉ de la defensa del barrio que se reÚne en phoenix arizona, que se formaron cuando surgiÓ la ley ley sb 1070. >>> de 1200 deportados a diario de estados unidos, la mitad sale de arizona, el impacto de la ley sb 1070. >>> especÍficamente el inciso 2 b que permite preguntar el estatus del individuo por sospecha. >>> se creÓ una nueva forma para denunciar abusoso por parte de agentes del orden. >>> por parte de la aplicaciÓn de telÉfono que desarrollamos para que la gente conozca los e derechos por parte de la aplicaciÓn, y reporte el abuso luego que pase la parada, si la persona se sintiÓ discriminada. >>> una aplicaciÓn de telÉfono denominada unidos contra la ley sb 1070, es bilingÜe, y pueden descargarla en los celulares de manera gratuita. >>> mÁs latinos usan la tecnologÍa, el telÉfono para

it is a win-win for arizona.hannon, the bottom line is the people in arizona have voted for it, and they send their federal dollars to the federal government. all we are doing is bringing the federal dollars back home to arizona and treating the people here that desperately need the care, keeping our hospitals, particularly in the rural area, open and employment and jobs. and that's our goal. i think it was a win-win for even -- for everyone in arizona. every state is different. it was the right thing for the people of arizona. >> i have to ask you since we are talking about the supreme court, i have seen you a lot the last couple years and arizona spent a lot of time with the supreme court, your reaction this week that said arizona can't require above and beyond federal requirements for people who come to register to vote, that they show documents proving u.s. citizenship. i know some say they are discouraged by the ruling, but see a way forward by the opinion written by justice scalia saying there are weighing

so it struck the arizona law down., arizona had this law at least three other, possibly four other states did and several others were waiting if the supreme court upheld it to enact similar requirements. people who challenged the arizona law said it was an attempt to suppress the votes by minority group members or people who were naturalized citizens because it set up additional hurdles that they had to cross that someone else would not. arizona said it was a way to reduce voter fraud. the supreme court said if you want this you have to go to the group and say we want to have an additional requirement on the form and can we change the form, if the feds say no then arizona could sue. they can't do this on their own. >> we have these five decisions that have come down today. we have 14 cases left that need to be decided by the end of next week. prop 8, doma, voting rights, affirmative action. should we be reading into why this might be taking so long? >> it is a great question. we don't know what they do in their private

en 1 decision de 7-2, el maximo tribunal del pais rechazo una ley estatal de arizona, conocida como la proposicion 200, que requeria comprobar la ciudadania y que rechazo a 30 mil potenciales votantes. segun la asociacion nacional de funcionarios electos latinos, naleo, el fallo de la

it's just today the supreme arizona's lotn that would require arizona voters to approve their citizens. here are the numbers to call -- you can also find online, send us a tweet, or 20 conversation on facebook. you can also here is the front page of " the arizona republic," -- the another arizona paper looks at this, "the dispatch" -- let us look at "usa today" on this issue -- we will talk later on with an editor who covers the supreme court -- but for now we are drawing on what they decided yesterday regarding this arizona law. the headline -- looking at more into this, three other states, alabama, georgia, and kansas require proof of citizenship before a citizen -- before residents can register to vote -- here is one comment from the vice-president of litigation from the mexican-american legal defense and education fund here are the numbers to call to talk about the arizona voter law and the supreme court's decision to strike it down. the story made the front page of "the new york times" today. baghda the seven-two rolling -- ruling -- this is the headline by david savage reporting

supreme court struck an arizona voter registration law.sion the high court ruled the 2004 law requiring voters to show proof of citizenship when they register is unconstitutional. the ruling could impact other states with similar voting laws like alabama, kansas and georgia. joining us now from the supreme court, nbc news justice correspondent pete williams. pete, thanks for being here. >> reporter: you bet. >> walk us through this ruling today. >> reporter: what the supreme court said is what arizona tried to do is preempted by federal law. that is to say, federal law is supreme on this question of how federal elections are conducted. it said that this arizona law runs contrary to a two-decade-old law called the motor voter law. it basically says that he can register to vote when you get your driver's license but you can also register by mail. you check "i swear i am a u.s. citizen," then you sign it at the bottom. arizona went further in 2004 by voter initiative prop 200. it required people to show documentary proof that they were citize

the supreme court said, arizona you are going too far. >> being from arizona, and living in arizona forn two decades, i understand the illegal immigration problemmvery well, idea that you don't have so show an i.d. to vote, means we should not have to show ran rid tani.d.to do ga gag else. -- anything else. neil: maybe they kill the i.d. thing. >> for everything? >> in my mind, arizona on the right track, they are trying to police their own problems, but if we as americans can't get behind this single i.d. situation. neil: nsa thing just killed the environment for this sort of thing. >> absolutely. you know, i don't think that voting on arbitrary. it needs to be accessible. neil: we need an i.d. on get over the i.d. phobia? we'll see you tomorrow as we continue to try to sort this o %-gerri: hello, everybody, i am gerri willis. tonighon "the willis report", important new information yo need to kn. also, the markets cat stop thinng about the feds. we will have theoney moves before this wek's big meeting. and the new det craze sweeping the nation. we are watching out r you tonight on "the

if the eac says no, arizona can take this dispute right back to court.eneral horn said he thinks that's a path forward to the supreme court mapped oust for them and thinks arizona will be vicious on -- victorious on this point. >> shannon, thanks very much. a man in upstate new york now facing serious legal trouble for locking four kids in a closet. here's the catch. he says he locked them up after catching them doing $50,000 worth of damage to his father-in-law's house. why is this guy the one in handcuffs? details next. my name is mike and i quit smoking. chantix... it's a non-nicotine pill. i didn't want nicotine to give up nicotine. [ male announcer ] along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. [ mike ] when i was taking the chantix, it reduced the urge to smoke. [ malennouncer ] some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these, stop taking chantix and call your doctor righ

'cause on the ground in arizona, they weren't listening. well, my whole thing-- we knew that music can make an impact based on communicating to people and especially through mtv. and if mtv is not going to be empty and is gonna put a video across the world, i always believed that music, you can help the people, you can hurt the people, or be transparent. and i never believed in being transparent when i open my mouth. so when we made the video, we knew the video probably was going to be seen at least once or twice and maybe banned. but i just thought, as a black man growing up in this country, it was the audacity of a state that says, "we're not gonna acknowledge "even one of the most peaceful human beings coming out of your camp." and i just thought, that being a slap in my face, i've got to make a statement. so i'm a big isaac hayes fan, so i took the title by the time i get to phoenix and just switched it to by the time i get to arizona. and i said, "okay, we're not condoning violence, "but we're saying that in this violent act, "america,

in arizona? crazy thing, she is doing everything in her power to implement obama-care in arizona. sometimes reality trumps ridiculousness. speaking of ridiculousness, that's a photo of the president in the white house situation room, being briefed last week on the latest threat to our homeland. that threat is climate change. it's hurricane seasons, everybody. we begin tonight with this guy. this is u.s. district judge roger vincent, a senior federal judge for the northern district of florida appointed by ronald reagan, has a facebook fan page with 198 likes. he is a chameleon flower enthusiast, president of the american commeel camellis society. he has found his way into the news in a very big way. judge vinson enjoyed brief stardom and tea party ruling obama-care was unconstitutional. he was actually the second judge to rule the health care violated the constitution but the first to rule it was so thoroughly and offensively unconstitutional the entire law needed to be thrown out wholesale. it wa

his only previous start here in arizona was back on april 10th of 2011. has about two dozen friends here at the ballpark tonight for this one. breaking ball. kubel, down low. one ball, one strike. >> bob: manager dusty baker said you could tell that mike leake was special his first big league spring training when starting pitchers are allowed to leave after the fifth inning of the game figuring all the big leaguers are out of the game by that point, mike leake did not leave, stayed right there, sat next to dusty baker, wand to learn as much as he could as quickly as he could, really made a good impression on the coaching staff. >> justin: he made such a good impression, he never had to go to the minor leagues. he was drafted, went to fall ball, spring training and made the opening day roster out of spring train. 1-2 outside. two balls, two strikes. >> bob: and mike leake endeared himself to the clubhouse staff, he'd help hang the laundry, put duffel bags away. >> justin: 2-2. and back-to-back 1-2-3 innings by mike leake. a return to phoenix after a word f

. >> si hay una pareja que vive en arizona y se casa en california pueden regresar a arizona legalmenteite en arizona porque ahÍ viven. >> las Órdenes de deportacion de indocumentados casados con ciudadanos del mismo sexo podrÁn ser suspendidas pero esa decisiÓn llego tarde para este hispano porque fue deportado. >> si esta ley existiera 10 aÑos atrÁs mi compaÑero no hubiera sido deportado y es una reivindicaciÓn de la relacion y nosotros tiemsiempre estuvimos o correcto. >> inmigrantes como walter cuya pareja es ciudadano celebra porque sus hijos adoptado en su guatemala recibirÁn los mismos beneficios que los hijos de las parejas heterosexuales. >> estar como en una familia (en inglÉs) mmm... derechos. >> son pareja desde hace 5 aÑos, estÁn felices porque ahora sÍ serÁn reconocidos como familia. >> ya no es el matrimonio, tenemos el matrimonio entero porque el gobierno federal a partir de hoy nos reconoce como casados. >> y como familia,. >> lo que mÁs les alegra. >> cÓmo se beneficiarÁn sus pequeÑas hijas clara y olivia. >> a partir ir su familia no son de segunda clase somos como cu

y en fallo que elimina la propuesta 200 de arizona, que dejÓ sin votar a mÁs de 30.000 personas.dictaminÓ que los estado nos pueden obligar a los votantes a demostrar que son ciudadanos al inscribirse. desde los Ángeles, carlos boto falls c botifoll con todos los detalles. >>> 7 de los 9 jueces de la corte suprema, incluyendo sonia sotomayor, in validaron, probar que eran ciudadanos para poder inscribirse y votar abogados, llevaron la demanda al mÁximo tribunal, argumentando que la medida disminuya la participaciÓn de las urnas, especialmente de minorÍas. >>> poner requisitos caros y difÍcil de componer salirse del trabajo y llenar la aplicaciÓn. luego de promulgar la proposiciÓn 200 en arizona en el 2004, mÁs de 40.000 no pudieron vot votar al no te fener los docume que les pedÍan. >>> fue parte del movimiento anti inmigrantes y establecer un medio ambiente hostil hacia el inmigrante en arizona. hey! al aplaudir la decisiÓn. en vez de poner barreras, hay que construir mÁs puentes para dar mÁs acceso y facilitar el voto. el recuerdan como intentos fallidos de purgas electorales c