now, the oc opinion, mort already described, doesn't atrekked to wrestle with the broad implications of separation of powers of its claim. and the recess has occurred. instead, it sort of proceeds, to me, a rather flawed process that a senate practice of using pro forma session is invalid because it impedes the president's pow tore make recess appointments. that, ladies and gentlemen, is an utterly bizarre claim. the constitution allows the president to make recess appointment only when the senate is in recess. it doesn't guarantee him the power to make any such appointments or even one to accept the senate is in session continuously of an intra-session. the recess appointment powers never comes into play. now, let me close by saying that i'm reasonably confident. we can discuss that a bit more. that the courts will strike this down. the courts not to do so would greatly weaken knot just congressional authority, but diminish individual liberty that depends for its ultimate preservation on separation of power and well functioning system of checks and balances. unfortunately, a great d