or five authorities, that is, a potential authority, that is, an authority that has the authority of authority. there is no actual reference, so this meaning is correct , that is, the first sentence clarifies the last sentence . the main issue regarding principle 17 is whether the qualification mentioned at the beginning of this principle is sufficient for the condition of leadership or the future leader according to another part of the same. esl must be a reference. among the 10 people who are qualified, they choose a qualified person. among the 10 people who have authority, 3 people have the authority. therefore, the current authority is not in this phrase, so it is the form of the current authority. the basic rule is that it is enough for the future leader to have authority or in other words, it is a potential reference and can become a reference in the future. however, from the legal point of view, ayatollah meshkini's personal opinion is not enough. the guardian council is responsible for interpreting the principles of the constitution. a point that ayatollah meshkini himself al

>> we have quite a number of well-known authors that are part of the authors guild. we also have all kinds to be a member you have to have a published book or certain levels of income we have memberships were the income levels are lower so that is so we can accommodate itself published authors that may not be going through a traditional publishers but it is an opportunity if they call them independently published. >>host: how did you get into this work? >> i have been a copyright lawyer for about 25 years i worked at the copyright office and library of congress i spent a lot of time advocating for authors' rights as a lawyer and in private practice i dealt with the number of authors as well as publishers try been very much a part of this role professionally and then i was an author and my husband is an author my stepdaughter is an author and many of my friends so i am very empathetic to their plight. >>host: because of the electronic aspect has that changed for the authors? >> because part of that contract is that they have not changed enough things are really shakin

authorization. a new aumf might include provisions providing certain procedural protections for the use of lethal force against americans who join terrorist groups. provideing might also procedural safeguards for detention of terror suspects captured by the military outside of the united states and certain congressional reporting requirements. finally, congress should also make it a priority to update the war powers resolution, a bipartisan commission chaired by former secretaries of state baker and warren christopher called impractical and ineffective. i applaud the war council consultation act of 2014, drafted by mccain and came to implement the recommendations. -- recommendations of the commission. members of congress have understandable concerns about approving a broad new authorization and extending what many view as a forever war. however, i convinced that am congress can come together to agree on a new aumf to provide our military forces the clear legislative authorization and congressional s

rand paul amendment to repeal the authorization. senator charles schumer on the tax policy proposal. after that, later this week prime minister question time in the british house of commons. rand paul introduced an amendment repealing the 2001 and 2002 authorizations for use of military force in iraq and afghanistan. next, the debate on the amendment from the senate floor. "after words", senators voted 61 - 362 table the amendment. >> senator from maryland. >> we celebrated the anniversary of september 11 this week. it was a day that none of us will forget. we we were attacked and we want to take every necessary action to go after those who perpetrated this attack against america and protect our country. i was part of the congress had time and was part of the congress that passed the 2001 authorization for the use of military force. p that was targeted toward afghanistan, and i was part of the congress that willie took up the 2002 authorization for use of military force against iraq, i voted against that authorization. it's now been

>> there is inherent in the word authorization the scope of authorization. that is the access, the authorized access, then you are using the access in a manner not permitted so to use it. so, you are exceeding a limit on your authorization. but i think that so actually refers back to the word access. but to clear up any confusion , the word authorization refers to specific individualized permissions and there will be systems that don't really require that it all. if i access a public website, just like i wouldn't really normally talk about going to a public park with or without authorization, that's just a thing everyone can do, that wouldn't be a system. >> it seems to me you are putting a lot of specificity into the word authorization that it doesn't have. you could have authorization from an employer or even a professor. a professor teaching a small class, 12 seminar students and she says you may use a computer in class to take notes, but for no other reason. like personal gmail? >> your honor, i don't think that that is the kind of authorization the stat

my husband is an author. my stepdaughter is the author. many of my difference our authors so i'm very empathetic c to the plight of authors. >> host: over the years and particularly because of the electronic aspect, have contracts for authors changed? >> guest: that's a good question because part of our fair contract initiative is that they have not changed enough. things are really shaking up in the industry. we would expect to see more types of models of publishing arena. you would expect in digital media, the deals are sort of up for grabs, what the creator might get. there's more diversity, right? part of our fair contract initiative is that we want to take a step back, have publishers do the same and say what still makes sense today in this environment? and do it in a way that it ensures authors are real partners in the publishing agreement. i will amend what i just sit and say there has been some recent changes, and they have largely favored publishers to the detriment of authors. for instance, things like advances need to be paid ou

it takes our authority, our article 1 authorities away. we're repealing our article 1 authority and yielding it to the president of the united states. telling the president to rely solely on article 2, in my judgment, is a big step backwards from the war powers reform and reasserting congress' article 1 powers. it's also inconsistent with the war powers resolution. madam speaker, the house is not in order. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman may proceed. mr. mccaul: it's also inconsistent with the war powers resolution. that law says that the president's article 2 powers are limited to responding to an attack on the territory of the armed forces of the united states. it does not cover american civilians in a foreign country, such as our contractors, our diplomats, and our embassy who are under attack as i speak in iraq. we should not encourage any president to go it alone without article 1 congressional authorization. finally, today's vote is not happening in a vacuum. this rushed, stand-alone repeal without any consultation with the de

what is the authors guild? >> an organization that was formed to represent authors the end their interest copyright free-speech we have been doing the same thing over 100 years we just had a panel looking at the standard trade publishing agreement asking questions if the terms are there in the digital world we have 9,000 members we provide services for authors and agents. we provide web site services so if we help them to build a web site and we spend a lot of time on advocacy that we all have authors try to assure that they can make a living today so we take a survey of our members one year ago that as we expected from anecdotal evidence that the survey shows us over 30 percent from the mean annual income of 24,000. so pretty low wages that tends to be very highly educated in india gets to the point where it is unsustainable, have. >>'' we're focusing on now was to ensure that those authors can continue. >> 9,000 members? we have quite a number of well-known authors that are members of the authors guild a hint

authority and authority to collect and spend offsetting collections. i use the term backdoor spending narrowly, only to describe offsetting collections. the definition of offsetting collections, they are essentially fines, fees, settlements that agencies spend without congressional action. they don't need approval because they received budget authority. yet congress is not relinquishing power to tax and spend. congress retains the ability to conduct oversight and change how theyoffsetting collections oper. it usually does so by including limitations in appropriations bills. there are benefits to the agencies, it gives them efficiency and insulate programs from the political process. it grants flexibility in program administration and insulates the agencies from congressional interference. there are benefits to members of congress. the practice allows for a inmick known as changes spending that allows appropriators to artificially reduce the cost of appropriations bills, to spend that money elsewhere. it also allows members to avoid responsibility to fu

they authorize-- it authorizes war against groups known to ought-- to operate together. it sounds like-- hardly sounds like we will have less war. equally concerning is that it unconstitutionally delegates or transfers and enumerated power from congress to the president. article 1 section 8 gives congress the power to declare war. corker kane initially authorizes war but says to the president you get back to us. give us an initial list in case we missed anyone we are currently at war with, and if you want to add any associated, this transfers the power to name the enemy and its location from congress to the president. worse yet this changes the nature from a simple majority affirmative vote to require a super majority vetoproof vote to disapprove of set-- presidential wars. if there is a new force the military will attack, the only way that congress can stop the president is now a two thirds vote to overcome the toe. the constitution is flipped on its head. this fundamentally transfers the power of war to congress from the president. the hearing is convened to explore pr

none of which is authorized. secretary tillerson admitted there is zero legal authority, not even through a perversion of the 2001 or 2003 aumf to begin military action against the syrian regime. and yet it seems as if this isn't a series of one off incidents. we now have five incidents in 45 days. i want to explore with you the limits of the president's article ii authority in the context not of the campaign against isis, but against a developing war between the united states and the syrian regime that may end up a major shooting conflict that occupies all of our attention in the not so distant future. two questions to both of you, two ways to view this. first is the justification that we are engaged in self-defense. there is a --ieth would imagine there is a limit to that argument just because the other guys shoot first doesn't mean that you don't need an authorization to continue to return fire. so we are now five engagements in of the argument of self-defense. how do we begin to parse when this is article ii

- or authority.should work with some other agencies. they seem to have some money is left on spent. i do not know how they seem to get it exactly. thank you very much. supervisor mar: is there anyone else from the public that would like to speak? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i would just like to remind the committee that the item will be discussed tomorrow night. with that, again, i'm available to answer any more questions you may have. supervisor mar: thank you. see no questions, let's move this item forward. thank you. please call the next item. >> next item, increasing the amount of the legal services contract with nossaman llp by $330,000. >> this item starts on page 37 of your package. this is a contract issued. the work of volume entity, we have special -- specialization designed by staff. currently on the authority legal team, we have the city attorney who advises the authority on routine contract items. we have co-bond counsel for the authority. we also have authority general leg

to seek those authorities. i want to thank members of the senate, including members of this committee, who have worked tirelessly on this issue. i want to acknowledge several senators for your leadership and to think former senator udall for his efforts. i know that members of his committee and others in congress are also actively considering options to repeal and replace the 2001 aumf. as these efforts continue, the biden/harris administration stands ready to provide our guidance and expertise and other materials to assist congress in its deliberations as the chairman noted, those conversations are already ongoing. repealing outdated, broad, or unnecessary authorizations for the use of military force, and replacing them as needed with narrow, clear, and specific frameworks that allow us to continue protecting our people and interests around the world. finally, i want to take a moment, chairman and ranking member, to thank you for your help in confirming, trying to confirm, state department nominees. i think th

to empin that it port authority supervisors and order port authority employees to realign port authority lanes or in the private context, for someone to usurp the authority by deception of a taxicab company's dispatcher and order the cabs and the drivers to good wherever the fraudster pleases. they don't get a free pass simply because baroni worked for the port that when the evidence showed he didn't have the power to direct these resources in this way without telling the lie. they don't get a free pass because their hypothesizing that legitimate decisionmakers might in theory have decided to realign the lanes when the precise point of their scheme was to take these resources out of the legitimate decisionmaker's hands and put them some heir own hands. and they don't get a free pass simply because their motive happens to be political. let me start with the legal argument made by kelly's counsel which seems to be drawing a distinction between public uses and private uses and there are two main problems with that -- actually probably three. one is i don't see where license for that is in t

so who are the authors you're working with? how many authors have chosen to use your platform? yeah, we've we launched about a month ago and we're seeing really great sign ups where, you know, we're we're we're growing, you know, we're growing very nicely getting new authors every day. you know, we've had some of the some of the big names who've been with us since early are folks like walter isaacson and doug preston and susan orlean and sylvia de and. and, yeah, it's growing. it's growing very nicely. we're we're currently adding a book about every 5 minutes is about the current rate. and given that there is there is, you know, almost no licensing for books just, you know, just a year ago, we think getting to a book every 5 minutes is really good progress. and when you say we're adding a book, it's not like you own this book. correct? what does that mean when you say we're adding a book? that means an author has made their book available for licensing through created by humans. so that means that book is now available if an ai company wants to come and license it. the book is

based on financial impact alone, authority staff determined it would be to the authorities staff -- advantage to remain in their current location, with the area closest to city hall, it made the most sense. with that, i am seeking a recommendation to exercise the option with vno and to allow the executive director to contract and negotiate all terms. >> commissioner maxwell? >> it would also cost us a great deal to move. >> yes, the estimates included does not factor in the amount of staff time it would cost to pack everything, arrange for the move, this is just purely how much it would cost in rent. an estimate of fair market value over the next five years. >> i appreciate the attachment. it shows the viability. 1390 market is fox plaza. even though the rent is lower, as supervisor maxwell said, the cost of moving other associated costs i am sure is much more cost-effective to stay in the current space. >> it is a lower rent initially for fiscal year -- fy11, fy12. as you go on, rent increases incrementally from $1 and up to $10. >> commissioner elsbernd? >> if a civic center is established,

he talked about the shift in authority and a shift to author. i say there's been a shift in consumer and the reader because they are saying this is what i want to read and the authors and publishers are responding to that because of digital, because of self-publishing. we very much look to help us see now new genre we all talk about, new adults. >> giveth in addition. >> no adults, adult contemporary fiction and 18 to 25-year-old protagonists. it has the better the feel of young adults because it's got the high-intensity feeling in the conflict. but not quite adult because we are dealing with the coming out of college, all the issues he saw what appeared as if they are genre to place two years ago. nobody knows how to solve it, nobody knew that america was an know existed, nobody knows would be at thing. the last year we've seen new adults explode because the author said this is what i want to write in the reader says this is what i want to read. >> self-publishing has been successful in some genres you're familiar with. romance, for example. wh

the authority can elect to defer authority infrastructure work. they can be -- they can elect to do that for up to 10 years. that is, i believe, a new addition since the staff report, and we will correct it. they can also differ -- elect to defer additional work. they can opt for up to 10 years to defer major improvement. and then they can opt to do other work. essentially, just to be clear, all these other categories, authority infrastructure work, or the deferred flavors are work that are eligible for rent credits or reimbursement. we will look at the cordele for performing $55 million, and brad will talk about the scopes of work and their cost estimates later. for that cordele, there will be two primary things that happen, long-term rights that will cruise the development authority. they will have up to 10 years to do the analysis and perform seismic upgrades as part of deferred additional worked additionalwork. -- deferred additional work. as part of the process, getting this done, there will be cost recovery from the work they do. if they end

as we began the audit the housing authority was going through major changes. there was a new commission that came into being of february 2013. there was a new interim executive director so as we were doing this audit the new housing authority director and the commission were beginning to make many changes that address some of the issues and concerns we saw in the audit. i wan to thank miss smith and he staff and [inaudible] and his commission members for the assistance they gave us in conducting this audit. i will now have amanda give her presentation. >> good morning supervisors. my name is amanda and i'll be presenting some highlights from the budget analyst performance audit of the san francisco housing authority. our audit had five focus areas, compliance, government, financial management, program management and operational management with a particular focus on staffing. we looked at how efficient and effective the housing authority has performed across those variables and we also considered how that compared with other housing authorities across the count

the president's authority to use force against isis is further reinforced by the authorization for usef military force against iraq or in more plain terms, the 2002 aumf . in addition to the authorities granted to the president by statute, the president has the power under article 2 of the constitution to use military force in de certain circumstances to advance important us national interests including to defend the united states against terrorist attacks. as an example, president reagan relied on his authority as commander-in-chief in 1986 when he ordered airstrikes against terrorist facilities, military organizations in libya following a terrorist attack in west berlin which killed and wounded civilians and us military personnel. the united states has the legal authority to prosecute campaigns against the taliban and associated forces including isis and is not currently seeking any new or additional congressional authorization for the use of force. the d 2001 aumf remains a cornerstone for ongoing us military operations and continues to provide legal authority relied upon to defeat

i'm with the housing authority. in january of 2018, i filed a complaint with the department of fair employment and housing for hiring practices and promotional practices at the san francisco housing authority. there are no african american males in any upper management positions. in february, i filed a complaint with the san francisco housing authority board, the commissioners, along the same lines. but also relating to their financial practices as a result. and as it relates to the rent increases, and then in march, i filed a complaint with hud inspector general's office with the financial aspect as it relates to rent increases and their hiring practices, etc. in august 2018, the housing authority placed me on ad ministrative leave for trumped up charges that have yet to be proven with any truth to it. i'm on paid administrative leave for eight months. the relationship that i'm here today -- i could retire tomorrow -- the reason that i'm here today is because the san francisco housing authority has suffered tremend

i have to have some authority, as well. so i do have authority, as well. i have authority to suspend the privilege of the writ, because any other answer would just be silly or nonsensical. again, because if congress has a monopoly, what happens if the invaders take over congress or congress can't meet and we need to suspend the privilege? we just simply can't. it's a very clever argument and it's an argument that has won its admirer today, but of course it's an argument that suggests there can be no constraints on the executive, right? because the very argument he made equally applies to the army and the size of the army. it equally applies to appropriations. if congress can't meet to increase the size of the army, then any increase by the executive would be illegal if congress had the monopoly on the size of the army or on appropriations. so the logic of his position i think suggests that he should be able to do whatever he thinks is necessary when congress is not around. he didn't quite say that, but that's the logic of the position. and i think a lot of

authorization was never taken up. we've received that the president does not want congress to adjust the authorization, because he has adequate authority to do whatever he wants to do. we are the ones responsible for the conversation, not thete president of the united states. we had the authorization from congress, so mr. president, it is our responsibility to make sure when our men and women are sent into harms way, they have the direct authorization from the congress of the united states unless there is an urgent conversation to act so i would urge my colleagues we have a chance to start this debate right here and now by supportint the amendment, and i intend to do that.ment support of the statement from my colleague he knows as i know our responsibilities as the united states senator include important votes. certainly any vote involving sending america into war is a vote we will never forget at least not this senator and many of the votes i cast for the years in the house and the senate created sleepless nights bef

housing authority. sorry barbara. >> it's okay. well, i do wish to thank all of you on behalf of the housing authority and express our appreciation to the board of supervisors and the budget audit. it begins with the hud assessment last year and designating the housing authority as troubled for failing the financial and management indicator scores. ? january hud sent a public housing recovery sustainability team to the housing authority for public assessment and identified many of the problems that the analyst has confirmed. if july of this year hud will begin to provide several months of staffing [inaudible] address these problems and assist the housing authority in preparation of a comprehensive recovery agreement and action plan that will be executed between the housing authority and hud. the establishment of complete new leadership in february with the appointment of a highly qualified new commissioners by the mayor, the you shall gent need for making critical fundmental changes to achieve better delivery of its affordable hous

authorization.ight include provisions providing certain procedural protections for the use of lethal force against americans. who joined terrorist groups. authorizing but also provide procedural safeguards for detention of terror suspects captured by the military outside of the united states and certain congressional reporting requirements. congress to make it a priority to update the war powers resolution, a bipartisan commission chaired by former secretaries of state called in practical and ineffective. actplaud the consultation of 2014, drafted by mccain and came to implement the recommendations. members of congress have understandable concerns about approving a broad new authorization and extend the what meaning the new as a forever war. i am convinced that congress can come together to agree on a new authorizatione and congressional support they need to defend united states against al qaeda, isis and other terrorist groups rather than continuing to rely on a 16-year-old authorization. thank you

but as far as congressional authorization, there is no authorization, is that correct? >> that's my understanding, yes. >> i believe the president has article two authority only. sen. cardin: thank you. i want to get to what happened in niger and sort of understand where we are. because there is also limitations on the introduction of troops under the war powers act. limiting to 60 days. as i understand it, our troops in northern africa have been there much longer than 60 days. can you just explain very briefly what our mission was in niger when the tragedy occurred, and under what legal authority those troops were there? sec. mattis: i can. the troops are there under title 10 in a train and advise role. the letter from the president, from president obama in 2013, to the pro temp of the senate and the speaker of the house talks to the total number of u.s. military deployed there in 2013 was 100 in furtherance of u.s. national security interests. as president obama's report to you. that continues to be the case. at this time. mr. cardin: the specific mission that they we

authority. usually trying to quash subpoenas. the issue actually reached the d.c. circuit court of appeals last year and i'm going to give you the entire discussion of that court about the attorney general's statutory authority to hire special counsel. because binding precedent establishes that congress has by law vested authority in the attorney general to appoint the special counsel this court has no need to go further to identify the specific sources of this authority. as justice gorsuch said last year in a different different context, yes. that's it. so what is this binding precedent that is so overwhelmingly powerful that the courts don't even need to look at the statute? well, it turns out it's two cases. one of them is united states v. nixon from 1974, the watergate tapes case. and one is a d.c. circuit case from 1987 which involved investigation---the iran contrainvestigation of oliver north. because i have limited time here i can't go through the 15 pages of the forthcoming law review a

authorization. senators corker, mccain, and others wish to rectify the lapse of in constitutional declaration of war by passing a new authorization for force. their motives are genune. but really there are two big issues here that need to be fully debated. number one, does it matterho wields the power to initiate war. our founding fathers believed strongly that it did. they squarely delegated the power to declare war to coss. madison put it this way. the executive is the branch most prone to war. therefore the constitution with studied care vtethat po, the power to declare war with the legislature. so, yes, it is the job of congress to declare or initiate war and congress has been rm find ourselves involved in here the authorization fails us. the authorization is not the against eight groups but says to the president, hey, you get back to us. give us an initial list in case we missed anyone we're currently at war with and if you want to add any associated forces to the list, please send us a report.

to support the authority and to authorize city staff positions assigned to support the authority's operations. so, with that summary, unless there are any questions, i would like to turn it over to my colleague, to tonya, who will address the report. (please stand by). my fear is that they're going t. and that's a fear that -- and i. and i understand their frustrat. the management companies. but they are more of like a mac. these management companies are e before the housing authority had people could call this person, d help, but the management companm haven't dealt with things like . or if they have, they are dealiy than we would normally deal wit. let's get resources in there. i'm wondering is there funding e working with the other departmep these management companies deall need of that transition. and spending all the money we dw coming back down because of beh. >> well, i think that it's a ime funding support and continue tor services and engagement and hou. i think what you are pointing oe that funding and infrastructure. so we have staff that are assigd ensure that resident services as

eyeball the authorization i need.i agree with you that congress has responsibility to be clear on its authorization and to repeal the 2001 and replace it. how do we do that when we don't know what the president wants to use as far as military force? he hasn't come to us. >> as i said i do think having that dialogue and certainly in the form of a strategy from the administration is central to understanding the right set of tools -- >> but they are not having it with us if the administration is not having that dialogue. >> correct. i'm in complete agreement. you all have passed a requirement for them to submit that. it has not come in. that said i think you can still move forward on it aumf. it may not be the aumf the ultimate desire but the burden is on them then to comport with her strategy. >> so you believe the fact the weapon authorization out there that is being misused is more important for us to clarify then knowing exactly what the administration wants normally congress doesn't past and aumf and less the comman

and you ought clean parents, say danish authorities are quicker to intervene than authorities in germany. that may make it a more consistent policy. but is it more successful? case numbers between the 2 countries hardly differ and the authorities actions are stirring controversy in denmark. city authorities in flints book don't see themselves as being in competition with their danish counterparts over child protection. but german policy aims to keep children with their parents, said spokesman, claiming stationed off revenue. nicholas agates, company, elijah, is not like we advertise and say, lemme every one come here. the conditions are great. thank you. it's lagging. yes, i busted to someone moved to flood zone her and we receive files showing a case that we need to follow you nothing. but of course we handle those cases. that's kind of depends what the issue is. what's gonna happen? parents may be overwhelmed, it may be addiction when rhythm and we try to help in such a way that in the end the child can stay with the mother and thus, and for badness, can this by them what i moved. we t

they were asked by the world jewish congress to issue a license f to authorize thatunds beto authorize that funds made available to help jewish children escape nazi controlled europe. they worked for months to secure this authorization, and enable the funds to be released to support this effort. significant obstacles within the u.s. government to do so. having learned through this work about the atrocities happening in europe, secretary morgan found, john paley, and others believed that the u.s. government should do more to she was jews appear -- in europe. from late 1943-19 44, they pushed for the establishment of the war refugee board, read by john kaylee and other members of this. their role in saving the lives of thousands of holocaust survivors in the final years of world war ii, including through work with rep. walberg:'s. at the very same time these efforts were underway at the treasury department, my parents were jewish children hiding in europe. underground ing the forest, haystacks. they were also hidden by courageous individuals who risked their own lives and others. that th

it's not what the authorization says. it's not what congress intended when it passed that resolution. i was here. i was here. i remember it. it dealt with threats coming from saddam hussein's iraq. saddam hussein is dead. his government and regime are long gone. this war authorization has no relevance to present day iraq and should be repealed not used to launch more military action. we'll likely hear an argument that repealing the iraq war resolution would undermine our ability to combat terrorism around the world. but let's be clear about something, the iraq war resolution, what we are seeking to repeal today, was never intended to authorize our fight against isis or other associated terrorist groups and it is not needed as authorization for any of these operations. there is another existing authorization for the use of military force, the measure the congress passed after 9/11 to deal with al qaeda. i don't agree with the administration's overly expansive interpretation of the 9/11 aumf, i think they have stretched it

there's also questions of moral authority, political authority, and the abdication of responsibility in this body. 75% of the members of congress today were not even here when the 2001 authorization was passed and thus have never had to cast a vote on it, even as our men and women risk their lives and in some instances are killed in action. simply put, the 2001 has become a golden ticket that justifies military action against terrorist groups all over the globe without the need for additional congressional approval. i'm not surprised the executive wants to keep it that way. who wouldn't prefer such flexibility but we have a job to do. here's what we need to do. here's what i think needs to happen. we need to end the legal gymnastics with the 2001aumf, a 60-word authorization against the perpetrators of 9/11 and applying that now to the fight against isil, boca ra ham and others is a stretch. the aumf outlined the military action as follows, nation's organizations or persons, the president terms -- aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on september 11, 2001, or that harbored such

the ten people who have the authority of one authority or three authority or five authority , he first specified that from among those who have the authority, the authority of the authority has the authority of the authority, that is, we clarify the first sentence of the last sentence about the principle 107 is whether the authority of authority that is mentioned here at the beginning is sufficient for the leadership company. the two future leaders according to another part of i choose the same muscle as the reference out of the ten people who have the authority of authority, how many people have the authority, so scientific authority is not in this phrase, the problem is the current situation , ayatollah meshkini, the head of the assembly of experts, from article 107 of the constitution, it is enough that the future leader has the authority of authority or it is a potential reference phrase and can become central in the future, however, legally, ayatollah meshkini's personal opinion is not enough. the principles of the constitution are the responsibility of the guardian council, as ay