baric looking at gain of function research way back in the year 2000. going on on, again, before the sars virus ignited in the early 2000s. they were looking into ramping up, quote, pathogenic infectiousness of these viruses,sen answering them for -- enhancing them for treatment and for vaccines. so we're doing that when we don't have our defenses up and and running here in the united states inn terms of our strategc national stockpile that couldn't even handlet an outbreak like this. so what is dr. fauci doing saying, yeah, yeah, yeah, let's go gain of function when we don't have our defenses ready tn battle it? what was that about in. >> well, you know, i don't think we can ever have our defenses to battle against every man made frankenstein virus that can attack human beings. that's why we have to be very careful on limiting who does the research, how it's done and the controls that are on it. and no matter how you look at it, doing that kind of research in a laboratory that has had errors, the nontransparent society that's linked up with the chinese

ralph baric,ken american virologist who worked with the wuhan lab.ci said when he was asked about the doctor by senator rand paul. >> dr. baric does not do gain of function research and if it is, it's according to the guidelines and it's being conducted in north carolina. not in china. >> a bat virus spike protein that he got from the wuhan lab. at least 200 scientists have signed a statement saying it is gain of function. >> it is not. if you look at the grant and you look at the progress reports, it is not to gain of function. despite the fact that people tweet that. >> sean: that's why rand paul says that dr. fauci absolutely lied. early on we tried to give fauci the benefit of the doubt. none of us knew all this was going on. we didn't know he was funding with his nih money that lab in w wuhan. it's been one flip-flop, one fail after another, one misdirection after another. now it appears one lie after another. these emails provide growing evidence that the lab leak theory had credibility, problems from the start, and fauci was warned, and fauci

baric's gain of research? >> dr.ic is not doing that research, and if it is, it's according to the guidelines, and it is being conducted in north carolina --- >> you don't think -- jackie: jason, i was particularly struck with this on may 11th, and that's why we played that sound bite. we gave him this money. he does not know that it wasn't used in a specific way or not. he has no idea once that check is written what happens. >> well, that's the whole point. it showed that rand paul was about three steps ahead of dr. fauci and does understand how this works. i mean, these are people that are supposed to be ablee to trak how a virus mutates and moves, but they can't seem to follow the money trail? when you give out a grant and you fund specific personnel or certain organizations, i think you still have a duty to figure out what in the world they are actually doing with it. so i think the truth is not on the side of dr. fauci here. and, again, he's got time to write books, he's got time to do all the "vanity fair" inte

baric going back to 2002. so what are republicans going to do here in terms of hearings?ats clearly aren't interested in trying to determine the origination of covid-19. republicans have called on democrats who are in the majority to hold hearings. since they won't, on tuesday we're going to have our own hearing. we don't have the authority being in the minority to hold official hearings, but we're sick and tired of waiting. we are inviting witnesses, expert witnesses that have credible evidence linking the origination of covid-19 to that lab in wuhan. we've invited dr. fauci to attend. steve scalise will be chairing this meeting. he's on the covid select committee, he's the ranking member of the covid select committee. i'm going to be there, jim jordan, a lot of leaders of different committees in the house will be there. we're going to have a serious, credible hearing because americans want and deserve to know the truth behind this, and for whatever reason, the democrats aren't interested in holding hearings. we're not blaming the democrats for covid-19. we're blaming ch

. >> this is an area where lynchings are getting more and more bar baric. >> a former domestic terrorismhildren, lynching was widespread in the united states. that there would be such a film, surprises me. >> birth of nation, a landmark film that came out in 1915. black people were portrayed in very demeaning manner. the ku klux klan as heroes. birth of a nation attests to the purity and chastity of white women. and black men with single white women is a distinct taboo resulting often in the death of the black man. >> the film became, you know, pretty much of a national phenomenon. president woodrow wilson endorsed it and showed all over the country. it showed in tulsa in the convention hall. it certainly validated these ideas. i can survhow to survive if our african-american during this period. and part of the answers came, they fought in combat units in france where they were treated with respect and honor, and they came back to the united states and they found none. >> we have black veterans in greenwood. they fought for their country. they fought for their freedom, so when they come

what is vital now is what happens next, because we believe it is clear that military baric such as thosewho have come to the uk seeking asylum —— r and suitable. the home office should now act quickly to shut down those barracks and make sure that people can be accommodated in communities where they feel safe and secure while waiting for a decision on their asylum claim. it while waiting for a decision on their asylum claim.— while waiting for a decision on their asylum claim. it begs the question. _ their asylum claim. it begs the question, what _ their asylum claim. it begs the question, what are _ their asylum claim. it begs the question, what are the - their asylum claim. it begs the i question, what are the conditions asylum seekers should expect here in the uk, just how quickly could they be found? ~ ., ~' the uk, just how quickly could they be found? ~ ., ~ , .,, be found? well, we work with people in the asylum — be found? well, we work with people in the asylum system _ be found? well, we work with people in the asylum system all— be found? well, we work with people in the asylu