and this seems to be the bill barr situation. but, you know, what he is saying about this particular case is pretty accurate. >> right, and i think, look, you can dismiss christie or minimize it, because kristie is after all arrival for donald trump in this. i don't think you can easily dismiss bill barr. and i'd like to take this opportunity, lawrence, to welcome bill barr back -- taking a step back to the reality based community that we all live in, maybe a small step admittedly. it's not a big one, given all the lies and nonsense he told before for several years. but it is an important one. look, i mean, the evidence, this indictment, i think all americans should read it. i think barr's takeaway is right, which you can't read this and be anything but horrified. these are obvious, serious felonies. i don't think it's a huge step of bravery for barr to admit that. it's like literally black and white on the page. but it's nice, you know, that he is acknowledging reality in this one instance. i don't think that rehabilitates bill

by the way, when bill barr who is a coward. bill barr was a coward. bill barr didn't do what he was supposed to do. i fired him and he has great hatred and that's okay some people do. some people love me very much.

barr himself put it, we need to take everything from ukraine with a grain of salt. but after rudy giuliani surfaced these allegations, this group was appointed. and they looked into, um, the form 1023. and this group was, uh, created in june. and spent the summer on it. and as i understand it, in august, determined there was no grounds to escalate from an initial assessment to a preliminary investigation. and the standard for moving from an assessment to a preliminary investigation in fbi prosecutorial protocol is whether there are facts giving rise to suspicion of criminal activity. so, apparently decided there was not and they called an end to the investigation. recall that this is under attorney general william barr and his handpicked prosecutor, mr. brady, who was a trump appointee. they were the ones whodecided there was no grounds further based on what the human source reported from a conversation with another person. they decided there was no grounds to escalate this investigative process. so, if there is a complaint the complaint is with attorney general wil

barr on lunch march 25th? >> i don't believe so, the timing was three days after he received the report, and you don't think in your meeting, you talked about the mueller report? >> i do not think that was, i think it was when i was meeting the attorney general, because i had come the u.s. attorney in connecticut. and mid to late february. >> maybe you can search your memory, and get back to us on that. it is troubling to me, because it is clear, you are brought in by attorney general, barr at the same week the mueller report was released, and the day after his misleading letter, which hung out there for 25 days. before the public at our hands, in our, eyes on the redacted report. >> you were hard to investigate the investigators, one week after you met with mr. barr on april 13th, attorney general barr's counselor said, the charm, emailed you offering assistance on behalf of barr saying, john, the a.g. has may be aware of the redacted, material you are working with and he asked me to provide you with my suppo

barr pardoned? manafort. >> i know who he is. >> he met with someone and discussed polling data. >> i know that the man met with a lot of people. >> he met will manafort and discussed polling data. >> i am aware of that. >> why didn't you look into it and see if the f.b.i. was correct that there was a connection between russia and the trump campaign to elect trump. >> my assignment was to look at the intelligence agencies not to look at a separate investigation done by the house, senate or director mueller. >> you don't think if the intelligence communities, f.b.i. and others came up with this information and did good work that that should be part of your balanced report? >> i'm not following your question, i apologize. >> i'm trying to fall ole your report. mr. donald trump junior would have called it a nothing burger. you got no convictions, you got nothing. it was all set up to hurt the mueller report, which was correct and redacted. to hurt the bidens and to help trump. you were a part of it. yo

by the way, when bill barr, who is a coward. you know, bill barr was a coward. he didn't do what he was supposed to do. i fired him, and he has great chairman. for the joint chiefs of staff, general milley will serve as my top military adviser. i have absolute confidence he will fulfill his duty with the same brilliance and fortitude he has shown throughout his long and very distinguished career. he was, frankly, incompetent. the last one i'd want to attack with as my leader would be milley. general kelly has been a star. he's done an incredible job thus far, respected by everybody. a great, great american. i know john kelly. he was with me. didn't do a good job. had no temperament. ultimately, he was petered out. he was exhausted. this man was totally exhausted. he wasn't even able to function. i am confident that jay has the wisdom and leadership to guide our economy through any challenges that our great economy may face. i had my situation with powell, and i beat the hell out of him. i was not a fan of powell. he was recommended by some people. i didn't like

they were going to impeach bill barr. we had unbelievable in the administration.ad some that we got wrong. and bill barr was a mistake. >> bret: what's your reaction to all of that. >> he said i was a gutless low life and clearly i have a gut that will shed light on his veracity there. this is the usual stuff. >> bret: he says that he fired you? >> well, i resigned on december 14th. december 14th. >> bret: republicans point to two tiers of junk. one of them is the hillary clinton case. this is andrew mccabe talking about that those weren't classified documents those was simply the content of email exchanges deemed to be classified. these weren't documents with classified stampings on the tops and bottoms and cover sheets and all that kind of stuff. should it have happened? no. what we didn't have is evidence that hillary clinton had intentionally exchanged or withheld classified information.

katy. >> he's also talking about bill barr after bill barr made those comments over the weekend. what's he saying about his former ag? >> reporter: he's got nothing but nasty words for him, and doesn't engage at all in the substance barr is saying. in one truth social post he called him a gutless pig, and doesn't speak to the argument that barr as the top law enforcement officer of the united states is making. another case of someone who once worked for the former president who while not in his employ, turned into a complete moron. it goes the came way with former trump employees. we're seeing the same playbook with bill barr who has turned critical in his legal analysis of the charges against his former boss. >> ken, have we heard anything from doj since jack smith came out on friday? >> reporter: we have not, katy, and they're staying far away from it. this is jack smith's show. his staff members are here on the ground in miami. but they're not saying anything right now. i just wanted to point out that bill barr in this clip that you played, that was the most cogent narrative i

what shot bill barr,? that's to come.menthol per drop*, and the powerful rush of vicks vapors for fast-acting relief you can feel. vicks vapocool drops. fast relief you can feel. ♪inspiring music♪ ♪ start your day with nature made. the #1 pharmacist recommended vitamin and supplement brand. ♪ ♪ the #1 make your dreammended car...a reality. mercedes-benz certified pre-owned vehicles are rigorously inspected to live up to the highest of expectations. with a majority of my patience with sensitivity, i see irritated gums and weak enamel. sensodyne sensitivity gum & enamel relieves sensitivity, helps restore gum health, and rehardens enamel. i'm a big advocate of recommending things that i know work. this is remington. he's a member of the family, for sure. we always fed him kibble it just seemed like the thing to do. but he was getting picky, and we started noticing some allergy symptoms. we heard about the farmer's dog and it was a complete transformation. his allergies were going away and he just had amazing energy. it's a

barr.stress tests, by dodd-frank, they reserving or, it proposing a test on the banks institution, results are made public. that is not the case with the liquidity testing. >> yes, the framework for liquidity stress testing and interest rate stress testing are internal to supervisory process, they are not a public exercise. >> when several times, svb of the noted by federal reserve privately of failing its liquidity test, is that correct. >> yes, that is correct, sir. >> no action was taken? >> act was taken but some was counter productive with respect to the actions taken. for example one step that the bank took with respect to the liquidity risk, is saw it was breaching its liquidity limit its changed modeling assumption to make the test less conservative. >> it took the test, failed the test and rewrote the test and then passed it that is good as you can. i hope that federal reserve is looking at adopting stronger liquidity rules. very similar to the capital rules. >> yes. >> one other q

bill barr is doing the lords work. jim jordan again, april 19, bill barr is pursuing the truth. exactly what americans want from their attorney general. now, if you are tracking bill barr no longer is defending or doing the bidding of donald trump and as it relates to mar-a-lago, bill barr has said the effort to present trump as a victim in the mar-a-lago document affair is cynical political propaganda. bar said earlier this month trumps -- trump's toes. then he sent the government acted responsibly. and it was donald trump who acted irresponsibly. my question for jim jordan is is this investigation of donald trump -- if this investigation is good enough for bill barr why is it not good enough for you? why are we going this -- through this and drag the apartment -- department and if someone you love is saying the investigation is valid? >> we are defending all of this, if we could show the next slide, the client that is being defended, the actions are actually quite indefensible. but this is what he wants because this is what you posted this morning. donald trump said congress,

thank god for bill barr. i mean, it is biblical when it comes to jim jordan and bill barr. bill barr is pursuing the truth exactly what americans want from , their attorney general so what does bill barr think about the mar-a-lago raid which jim jordan and others are upset about and the reason they've tried the department of justice here again? bill barr thinks the effort to present trump is a victim in the mar-a-lago document affair is a cynical, political, propaganda exercise. barr said just this month the government acted responsibly and it was donald j. trump who acted irresponsibly. i don't know what happened, but i can only assume that when it comes to bill barr, jim jordan is all in until bill barr departs with the one client that this committee fights for everyday, and that is donald trump. and that's to bed. that's too bad because as we have seen donald trump has no , regard for the law and anyone who defends him is going to be a foot soldier and a footnote and in history books that chronicle his corruption. i yield back. chair cline: the gentleman yields back. i w

i want to get your reaction to barr's reaction?is election of judge cannon to have people on the right, grown-ups, actually discuss not strict -- even more, important the gravity of the evidence. this is the same thing jack smith did at his very short press conference. explain that it's not simply trump's impetuous complete selves in her behavior, it's the damage to the national security, it's weaving about plans for our battle against iran or our defense capabilities. so those are things that for all we know already have done great damage to national security and could well do the same going forward because it makes our allies less likely to trust us. for someone from the defense community to be able to say this is a really serious grave offense in addition to a clear when i think counters the reflexive comments from everyone in the right who had written their comments before they even saw the evidence. >> before they even knew what this was about, actually got folks re-center the national security issue at play here. no surprise

>> marc: i think bill barr since he is citing bill barr.amie raskin is going through a lot, lost a child to suicide, going through recovering from cancer. bill barr said, no, i didn't shut down the investigation and you say bill barr sent to the u.s. team in pennsylvania and bill barr says i sent to the u.s. attorney in delaware and they didn't shut it down. these things are not compatible. give him the benefit of a doubt, he may be conflating two different investigations. bill barr is saying this is different that was sent to delaware and not been shut down. there is no room for this anymore, democrats have lied so much about the fbi and conduct, the fbi has lied to the american people, fisa court, we don't have room for the mistakes anymore. he has to correct and say i was wrong and get his credibility right. >> steve: there are so many open investigations because i read and mentioned "washington post" a moment ago, "washington post" talking about how bill barr sent something to the pittsburgh office for scott brady, u.s. attorney and bil

barr: sure. but in this case, this bank, under fed regulations, implementing dodd-frank as amended by the regulatory relief law of 2018, enhanced prudential standards applied to this bank, categorized as a large financial institution, as of february, 2021. two years before the bank failed. mr. clements: that's correct. in 2021 it became -- it got into that group. mr. barr: the fed report also said the federal reserve board staff provided the san francisco fed team a waiver to delay initial set of ratings under the l.f.i., large financial institution, rating system by six months until august, 2022. in your investigation, do you have any insight or visibility as to why the board waived that requirement? mr. clements: no, that's additional work we'll need to do. mr. barr: please look into that. the regulators at the fed are delaying implementation. they are. the law doesn't say that they have to. but they, the supervisors, the bank examiners are delaying implementation of the law that we passed and

my question watching the barr interview was sort of, who is listening to bill barr? a little bit of republicans, all shoulder to shoulder, singing from the same song book and then realizing that there is somebody singing a different song a few shoulders down, all of a sudden saying, oh now do we all look like dopes that we are out here carrying this guy's water when some of our own are coming out and saying this is not what they are trying to tell you that it is. do you get any sense from your republican colleagues, not necessarily the college of this community, because i understand they are part of a very specific cohort. but your republican colleagues more broadly, that they understand the risk this poses, not just to democracy, not to the republic, i would argue those are things that should be more important than anything else. but just to their own political survival? >> yes, so a couple of things. number one, i want to know where this bill barr was when he was serving? i mean, it's like, who are you, right? are you with jim and i? do you have twins? what is goin

attorney general barr.ed to be overly cautious. instead of doing what up, fear or favor pursue the facts where they took them the ladder-up approach makes no sense whatsoever we have plenty of evidence of exactly what was going on in the incitement by the president. even in our time, as you point out. we were only days after the insurrection after the attempted failed coup by the expresident we had lots and lots of evidence as we put before the senate and sadly, a trial that not enough senators were willing to talk about the truth and to vote the truth. but what has come now as a result of the january 6th commission, that bipartisan commission that did magnificent work, using mostly the words of those who surrounded the president, who wanted nothing more than for him to be successful, and now this ongoing reporting. i wish the attorney general, doj had moved so swiftly i fear for what has been lost. because remember, what john adams said we are a nation of laws, not o men. this seems like a calculation for

john bolton writes in his memoir he called bill barr when he thought u.s. foreign policy as it pertained to turkey had been constructed by donald trump, and of course john bolton was in the room for all of trump's attempts to extort president zelenskyy and to withhold military aid. do you think bill barr tried to do in private what he's so willing and eager to do in public? >> you know, i'm going to shy away from that question for a second and i'm going to say i hope an answer that's useful to you. big barr is to me emblematic of a fairly significant group of republicans who claire correctly describes as, you know, the old-school republicans and maybe some are rejoining it, maybe some are newly joining it, whatever. but there are many of them that i've spoken to who are actively rooting for trump to go down in this indictment. and for information that they have either learned from their friends who were at the white house at the time or other evidence they've learned in ways that i can't talk about here, they are citing some of that evidence amongst themsel

barr's approach borne out in the past, what do you think we're seeing from bill barr now, certainly a different emphasis >> when bill barr and neal agree on this, we are coming from the law from very different perspectives we have the same view, the idea that these are trump's personal play things or swag he gets to take because he was president is preposterous no system would work that way. no ally would ever share sensitive intelligence information with us but i'm worried i'll get struck by lightning when i say the sentence but bill barr has it absolutely right why barr is doing this i can't speculate. it was 100% clear and so, too, were the recommendations in the mueller report and he just lied on them. i'm still very, very upset that an attorney general of the united states would do such a thing. having said that, he's right on this and so are the rest of trump's cabinet. >> yet we've been following it. i wanted to give you the benefit of response. as you carefully state, we don't know exactly what's in his head. he's certainly changed course and when he starts saying now in the p

. >> most important part they are, barr did a book. barr was a coward. the name -- people that you named for every person you named i can name 20 people that loved the administration. and maybe more importantly the voters loved the administration. the voters are dying to get back to it, bret. the voters are tired of being laughed at all over the world. we are run by a fool. we are run by a man that doesn't have a clue. >> bret: i want to talk about

calling trump petty. >> you are right, rahel, because what bill barr did yesterday was basically taken the former president and not on this one issue only with the classify documents in indictment, but on the core of who he is, and the core of his character or the way he described it lack thereof, and calling him a narcissist, and calling him so many things, and again, making clear that he is speaking from experience, somebody interacted with him at the highest levels during the trump administration, and remember, he was donald trump's attorney general. as i was listening to him, i was thinking, you know, the argument that he made against donald trump for president is stronger and more potent for any republican primary voter listening than any of donald trump's actual opponents for nomination other than say chris christie, and it is just different, because chris christie didn't, and certainly he has known donald trump for over 20 years, but he did not serve with him, and serve in a loyal way with him as bill barr did. >> and as you point out, he had the experience of working very clos

what else did barr have to say about the charges against trump? >> reporter: >> looks like we have audio problems. we'll try to get back to her. let's talk further about this case with ron brownstein, a political analyst and senior editor for the atlantic. >> to see you. glad you are at the ready. so your thoughts now on bill barr saying this is a rock solid case against trump. do those words carry weight with the republican party? >> yeah, it is a striking contrast to what you were hearing from almost all republican leaders who have spoken out. we're in a familiar dynamic here with these very detailed, very serious charges that have been filed against former president trump where the only voices in the republican party just about willing to talk with those who preemptively condemn it as it is political, weaponized, it is a witch hunt. and those who think it is more serious with the rare exceptions of bill barr, chris christie, john bolton, they are remaining silent. so you have this enormous imbalance in the conservative information sphere where

this was under attorney general william barr and his hand-picked prosecutor, mr. brady, the ones who decided there was no ground further based on what the confidential human source reported from conversation with another person, decided there was no grounds in the investigative prosecutorial chain. if there's a complaint, the complaint is with attorney general william barr, the trump justice department and the team the trump investigation appointed to look into it but i am surprised my colleagues want to try to litigate this in public, much less hold the director of the federal bureau of investigation in contempt for complying with their request, when there was a whole process that was undertaken in that process came to its natural end. >> there were no criminal charges from what you saw today. >> not only were there no criminal charges but no escalation of the fbi investigation ordered by scott brady or attorney general william barr. they are signed off on ending that investigation. what we are talking about here is a confidential human source reporting a convers

by the way, when bill barr who is a coward. bill barr was a coward. bill barr didn't do what he was supposed to do. i fired him and he has great hatred and that's okay some people do. some people love me very much. >> he said he resigned. >> i asked him to give me a letter immediately because he didn't have the courage to go after some different things you and i have discussed that before. he was a coward. he obviously doesn't like me too much. and there are a lot of people that don't. there are a lot of people that feel just the opposite. >> bret: specific on the documents. >> let me explain. i have got a lot of things in there. i will go through those boxes. i have to go through those boxes. i take out personal things. as far as the levels at all. everything was declassified because i had the right to declassify. you want to talk about a mess, take a look at biden, where he has got 1850 boxes. he halls boxes stored in chinatown in d.c. he has boxes stored at penn center and boxes under his corvette and around his corvette sitting in a garage for yea

barr on lunch march 25th? >> i don't believe so, the timing was three days after he received the report, and you don't think in your meeting, you talked about the mueller report? >> i do not think that was, i think it was when i was meeting the attorney general, because i had come the u.s. attorney in connecticut. and mid to late february. >> maybe you can search your memory, and get back to us on that. it is troubling to me, because it is clear, you are brought in by attorney general, barr at the same week the mueller report was released, and the day after his misleading letter, which hung out there for 25 days. before the public at our hands, in our, eyes on the redacted report. >> you were hard to investigate the investigators, one week after you met with mr. barr on april 13th, attorney general barr's counselor said, the charm, emailed you offering assistance on behalf of barr saying, john, the a.g. has may be aware of the redacted, material you are working with and he asked me to provide you with my suppo

barr. he served as attorney general under former president trump. his book, "one damn thing after another" is now available in pa paperback. good morning, mr. barr. thanks for being here. >> thanks for inviting me, bob. >> former president trump says everyone except you says this indictment is about election interference and should not have been brought. he says you know the indictment is total b.s., our shorthand for what was said. he is known for watching the sunday shows. he obviously saw your appearance on another network last sunday. why is he wrong about this? >> well, this is not a circumstance where he's the victim or this is government overreach. he provoked this whole problem himself. yes, he's been the victim of infair witch hunts in the past. that doesn't stop the fact that he ducts himself that lead to situations like this, that hurts any political cause he is associated with. this is a case entirely of his own making. he had no right to the documents. the government tried over

- on the merits, i agree with bill barr. but i also think it's important that we keep in mind who bill barr is and his role in all of this as a longtime powerful enabler of donald trump and he did it as attorney general. let's not forget, bill barr, i'll be charitable, bent the truth to help donald trump evade any real responsibility for the whole mueller investigation, including obstruction of justice. bill barr also, he was one of the biggest proponents of the election fraud theory in the crucial months leading up to the 2020 election and to do that from the attorney general's suite is such an abuse of power that whatever he did later, and yes, after the election, he said there's no evidence of fraud, fine. but let's not forget what he did to help contribute to the conflagration in the first place. - elie honig, thank you for joining me on "firing line." - thanks for having me, it was great. [relaxed electronic music] - [announcer] "firing line with margaret hoover" is made possible in part by robert granier charles r. sch

barr: the gentleman will suspend. the speaker is protected and so the gentleman will refrain from disparaging and using personalities. ms. waters: i hope that will include -- mr. barr: certainly will. the accusation was mccarthyism. you heard it. i heard it. and it wasn't defined. so i wanted the definition but i'll be happy to move on. i do not -- mr. vargas: i don't want to disparage the speaker. we've been friends for 23 years and i respect him greatly. i do want to ask you about this. most of the questions today on the other side have been about the industry. they seem to think that the industry is not pleased with you. you don't meet with them enough. that they don't like you because some of your policies. is it your job to please the industry? mr. chopra: my job is to execute the objectives of the law to enforce the law and supervise for it fairly. we go overboard and i think i've exceeded the types of engagement that some of my predecessors have engaged in. but yes, there are certain times, particularly, when t

barr said people in pittsburgh weren't authorized.ermination made under trump white house. >> shannon: sent over to already open investigation in delaware. >> we don't know. i am saying this is an effort to distract from what we know. the reality is, with president trump's base, two indictments now fining of liability and sexual assault, twice impeached. they are locked into his personality. >> the people that love him love that is where he is going to go and stay. to this point about this fbi document i asked bill barr about. he is somebody who has seen the document, this is what he said after seeing it. >> reporting to this point always been joe biden denies any knowledge of what hunter and brother jim have been doing. according to the document, we have both read that is a lie. joe biden absolutely knows and has been engaged in this throughout the entirety of this corruption scheme that has been going on. >> shannon: knowing about it or benefitting from it, allegation there are payments from one source. we are also told it doesn't s

that's based on the summary by barr. barr made it look like those 33 people who were indicted and convicted don't even exist. nothing happens with russia, according to even sane republicans. that how thorough bill barr was in being a lackey to trump, but even he says trump is going to be cooked here. if this judge undoes that, is there any sanction against her possible? >> no, she's got a lifetime appointment. and again, she seems to have been looking at trump's base when she made her earlier decision. so it certainly is right that the court of public opinion and most lawyers would totally disagree if she continues to show all of this deference to former president trump. but legally, she wouldn't have any consequences. there could be intermediate motions about whether evidence is admissible or not that could go up to the court of appeals, but once the jury decides this verdict -- >> it's done. >> if the jury acquits former president trump, game over. >> you see, it just -- the drama never ends. you think it's done and it

bill barr, john bolton, mark esper. these are not litberals or moderates.onservative republicans. i think bill barr and john bolton are certainly more conservative than donald trump ever was in terms of policy and ideology what they saw when they were in the white house, what they're seeing in this indictment, which confirms what their observations were when they worked for president trump, is somebody who can't be trusted, someone who is not, in fact, in their view, fit for the oval office. when we wrote "the divider" last year, my wife and i, susan glasser, the worst and most damning testimony coming out for donald trump were from people who worked for him they were people who he picked to put in senior government roles. they were people who hoped to help him be a good president and came out feeling very disaffected and disturbed by what they saw. this indictment is being treated by a lot of republicans, even people who were allies of his, differently than the alvin bragg indictment and different than some of the allegations of the past because it involve

>> bill barr was told it was russian disinformation. so they lied to bill barr? >> did christopher ray lie to bill barr? >> i don't know that, but bill barr was told that the laptop was r russian disinformation. there was conspiracy theorys at the time around donald trump, but will barr relied on the fbi saying when they got this bribery form, this is russian disinformation. >> real quick, merrick garland came out and said i gave david weiss total disinformation. he said to eight people i'm not the decider, so did merrick garland lie last thursday? was he insulated from the fact of two attorney's generals in dc and l.a. said you can't bring this case here? how do you fill this gap? >> somebody is lying, merrick garland is lying, or the irs whistle-blower is lying. if i had to bet, i would say it is probably merrick garland. >> will you move on impeachment. >> can't you just put him in a room with weiss. >> i think that is one of the options. >> when you do that let's televise it. >> unfortunately fox is probably the only network that would televise it. >> i watch

we heard chris christie, and bill barr's reaction has been kind of withering.n't have any poll numbers to this point. do you have any sense that republicans you talked to, could essentially chip away that republicans would think, gee, he's in trouble, he can't run again, or is this going to make trump stronger. >> we're about eight or nine years of people waiting for the thing that's going to destroy donald trump's relationship with the republican base and we haven't seen it yet. that doesn't mean the future is, you know, indicative or past performance is indicative of the future there could be a tipping point we haven't seen it yet it's impossible to see is it one court, two indictments? two each in state and federal courts i don't know what it is, but we have not seen any indication at all of trump losing support in the republican base. instead, we've seen the opposite when things get tough for him, he tends to be able to rally people around him. >> as the white house watches it, they see the consenting trump as a more damaged general candidate. senior nbc ne

bush and he worked with bill barr.ar the comments from bill barr, very clear in what he sees in this indictment, how detailed it was, what this means for the former president. how much weight do you think his words carry? >> well, i think what really carries weight is what the indictment alleges and the ability, if they have it, which i'm sure they do, to prove the events in the indictment. it's a very damning indictment and if you read the whole thing, you actually see there's a long statement in there by donald trump himself talking about how important it is to protect national security secrets and how he's going to do something about it. bill barr is the worst attorney general in the history of the united states. he did everything he could to help donald trump secure the position he wanted as an autocratic president. he did favors for his friends. he misused the department of justice, including using an investigation in order to get donald trump re-elected, so at the end of the day what bill barr has to say is of no

barr se desmarÓ aÍ de la mayoÍa de la voces del partido republicano y dijo que trump "es un narcisistatemente conductas imprudentes". a diferencia de otros lugares.. en nueva york los inmigrantes reciben muestras de generosidad la ciudad anuncÓ que el documento de identidad emitido a los inmigrantes recien llegados podÁ usarse ahora para tener tarifas reducidas en el transporte Úblico... peggy carranza nos informa... seguimos en nueva york donde a los que entregan comidas de restaurantes pedaleando en bicicleta por las calles de la ciudad les toÓ tres aÑos lograr que las empresas les paguen al menos 18 Ólars por hora... pero ahora sienten que hay menos trabajo que antes y consideran que se trata de una represalia... blanca rosa Ílchez nos tiene la informacÓn... este Ía del padre fue muy especial para una familia hispana que fue protagonista de una inolvidable manifestacÓn de amor de una hija por su papa, le regalo la posiblilidad de una nueva vida al donarle un riÓn para un transplante... fernando renteÍa nos tiene la emotiva historia de gregorio zamarÓn, que ahora vive esta segunda op

, barr for supervision is doing on capitol cvs. i think senator -- even use the term that i was going to use, perfect storm, that these three all coming together. >> gonna buy your term? >> i'll call a very stressful situation. you know, you pointed out, you know, the capital will phase in. you can have all three of these events come together. i think you've addressed this already, but i want to add my voice. to that concern. safety and soundness, we have a lot of, job safety and soundness, inflation control, and full employment, full employment piece. this could be affected by this potential perfect storm. i hope all -- it raises with other members of the fight yesterday. i hope you will, again, i think you could ask, i don't know if you want to have anything else added to respond. >> i'll say that you're, right we're thinking very much about that. fortunately it's been orderly. the shrinkage of the balance seat have been -- there still a very high level of cash reserves in the system. we don't think they'll be scarce anytime soon

of course we have bill barr.d that he's at least saying look, any attorney general, republican or democrat, would understand the importance of this mar-a-lago case. >> tim miller, you had a front row seat to the impact chris christie had in the 2016 primary. and it did not accrue to his political benefit. which put him in the position to endorse trump before any other establishment republican. but he did damage marco rubio's political arc. he damaged marco rubio's brand. he humiliated him on a debate stage. chris christie has an interesting skill set as a politician. he's a former prosecutor. and that he's willing to deploy it forcefully, 24/7, in the media against trump is a variable we haven't watched happen yet. >> yeah, that's true. my front row seat is kind of why chris christie is such a tough one for me. i try to just step outside myself and say yes, objectively this is good, objectively someone with his skill set going after donald trump on fox in particular is good. i hope that he can get into other cons

he was totally wrong. >> when you lose bill barr in maga world, where are you?r here. what everyone thinks of mr. barr, he alluded himself to not only how much he has long been a trump defender in many ways but how he really does to this day argue that trump was unfairly attacked and maligned. you don't have to agree or disagree with that to understand and see how that speaks to mr. barr's world view, his approach, and the many, many deep relationships he has with republicans in washington and important places and around the country. and yet, that barr, that former attorney general and more than one republican administration, is responding to what? to evidence, which is what anyone who worked at doj and is in good standing is supposed to do. you can quibble another day about how he did it with the mueller report, but it's striking people like mr. barr are speaking out knowledgeably as they gather evidence and this is the beginning, not the end. there may be more like this from people who have their own credibilities or followings on the right, a sign that things