justice barrett? justice barrett: one question. one -- one difference between your brief and your position and universinorth carolina's is that from the student's peive -- and you were getting at this in some of you answers to justice sotomayor rly on about confederate white supremacist groups -- is that from the student perspective, you know, ts -- the educational benefit to the students might be in the form of counteracting feelings of isolation, sticking out, not beinsuorted. in light of that, i'm wondering if you have ng to say about fity groups and affinity housing? i think one thing at least insofar as i'm aware at the time grutter was decided and certainly bakke, that kind of a enomenon where you have groups, say, where, you ow live or, you know, black student groups, same for, you know, hispanic groups,t cetera, was not a phenomenon that was around and -- and i think one of th benefits is that it allows minority students to band together to reduce s the feelings of isolation that you've been talking about. do your clients p

suddenly we have just as amy coney barrett on and just she comes on in late 2020 and by may 2021 they've agreed to take the big abortion case. the dobbs and that's when i contacted my and said, no matter what deadline you might have thought i was going to make, we have to put this off for another year because i have see what they do with abortion. and that also became such a part of the story. alissa right. well, you know, one of the really interesting things about it, there are many interesting stories in the book, but i just i love how you kind of take us behind scenes. there are some big picture that you cover, but also really intimate details about what it's like on the supreme court, which, as you point out, is such a secretive branch of the u.s. government, sort of, broadly speaking. and you talk about conferences, sort of how those work and even for those of us who i mean, i'm an attorney myself, but, you know, we just don't get that kind of information can talk a little bit about how how sort of sausage gets made that that you bring to bear in the book. sure. and you know, a lot

in the barrett that he might _ great impact with its involvement in the barrett that he might areas -y see it, the just go for it, running from the floor and stuff and it's having a great impact overcome i think. , , ., ~ it's having a great impact overcome i think. ,, ., ~ ., i think. helps the work done in the . m or i think. helps the work done in the gym or the — i think. helps the work done in the gym or the chance _ i think. helps the work done in the gym or the chance to _ i think. helps the work done in the gym or the chance to be over - i think. helps the work done in the gym or the chance to be over the l gym or the chance to be over the next year will enable him to light up next year will enable him to light up the games in paris and she could win it standing or spending on his head. —— you could win it. the forest had tricked of the ones world cup it's been so eased by panama and formed a part of a comprehensive 4—0 victory after their first women's world cup and that is it for now and thank you forjoining us and we'll see you next time. hello. the mixed bag continues afte

and justice barrett perhaps called herself and originalist. how would you unpack that? >> sure think you for having me. i will start by saying when originalism really arose to prominent -- prominence most recently it was intent originalism and it was trying to determine the intent of the framework. given the various difficulties with that theory, first of all, there are many frameworks. how do we distinguish whose intent or whether the majority intent was? there is now the difficulty analytically but another difficulty is that it is not really fair to hold people to the original intent of the framework because they would -- or not expressed. pardon me. it could be handled with all odds to that context that we can be aware of what the governing rules are. because of difficulties, there was a change from original intent -- originalism and public meaning originalism which tried to ascertain the meaning of the word in the constitution when those words were ratified. i would say that is the dominant strain of originalism right now and the form of contextualism, of course. an

this has proven to go too far in some cases for justices barrett and kavanaugh. i can't say this about every case, but we can kind of see those three justices, roberts, along with barrett and kavanaugh, at least in some cases willing to move more incrementally. roberts has always been anincrementallist on the court. he didn't have -- an incrementalist on the court. he didn't have it on his side when it came to overturning roe but he had some success this year. now, it's really hard to know why that is. one possibility is it's about ethics. one of the reasons the supreme court is losing popularity is because some of the justices, especially justices thomas and alito, have been involved in questionable ethics practices in terms of reporting gifts, reporting free trips. in the case of justice thomas, reporting that his mother had her home bought by a wealthy benefactor in texas who also paid for justice thomas' nephew's private school. there's a perception in the public that there's something wrong at the supreme court. and i think that that in part, those ethics sc

justice barrett was just as likely the storm to vote with justice pagan as with justice thomas. let me say that again. justice barrett was just as likely this term to vote with justice kagan as with justice thomas. justice kavanaugh was more likely to vote with justice kavanaugh and the courts to most conservative justices, thomas and alito, voted together less frequently than liberal justices sotomayor and -- the supreme court is not in crisis. when they refuses to reliably and predictably advance democrats priorities. the court is not in crisis when it puts the text of our law above politics. >> mr. waltman, that is the assessment of the senate minority leader. what do you think? >> not really a surprise. he put them all there. and it is true that many of the cases in front of him, in front of the supreme court or any supreme court, are not being publicly -- they are on technical issues. so the statistics can show there will be agreements with justices among various issues. saponi look at the big ruling that change society in the last year and a half, ending affirmative action

he appointed kavanaugh, he appointed barrett. the court looks the way the court does the composition. the court is the composition of the court, because of those four years, those things have had consequences, not only in terms of the outcome of decision, but also just in terms of the way the court operates. this is you writing in the book the court's new conservative majority has used obscure procedural orders to shift american jurisprudence to the right, said flatly. so is that two parts of two questions of this question? first is, is that what's going on here? trump appointed justices were more open to the idea of this procedural trick being used and this is the way it goes, or am i missing something? so the problem is we don't the counter the counter side of, that argument. right. we don't know whether a majority of democratic appointed in the same circumstance like justice garland, for instance, would behave the same. so i think two different things are true and. i think it's worth stressing both points. the first is i do th

in each of them, alito and coney barrett suggested that they thought that that was the right law. so what we're talking about when we think about a fringe theory, the theory that is to the right of, further right of what alito and coney barrett have already said. yes, this is a dangerous theory. >> and michael, it strikes me that it is also an admission of defeat in terms of the culture. in terms of them admitting that the outcomes they want and that his fans want, the reason they love trump, is he's promising to bypass democracy to implement the things they want that a vast majority of americans don't want. it's nixon but much, much, much worse. >> much, much, much worse, exactly, joy. and here is a situation where they're gaming the existing system. they're not talking about doing things that are illegal, interestingly enough, and there's a parallel for that in germany 1933. hitler, and i'm not comparing donald trump to hitler, but in terms of the system, hitler basically used the existing system in germany in 1933 so that the will of an angry minority that is translated into po

>> not asking for to be overruled, your honor. >> thank >> justice barrett? justice jackson? you counsel. 12 has a tradition that has beenrespected for nium, they'reconsuming me is a product of and will cruelty itself immoral. california chose to rig its market that there was a moral products and -- the hiding that revolutionary women in a closet is simply an affirmative grant ofauthority to congress. they did they impose more demanding health and safety proof environments. i welcome the courts questions. >> counsel, how broadly would you de what's immoral? >> your honorthink when it comes to the product, you would at the closeness of the relationship between the regulatio and the product itself. in this case, theyery you can look at three considerations in parti first, the market distinguishes between these cts. they distinguish -- and regulas well. between quake raised pork that is inhumd humanely raised pork. >> i mean the term, the definition of the term immoral. a immoral. >> i think in l, i'd be my second considerations. one of the s it might look at was whether the sta

the dissent was written by justice barrett and she was joined by kavanaugh. that was a unique lineup. i'm not sure i've seen that before but you can correct me if i'm wrong. we may not see that again but it was really interesting. the majority basically said that the 1970 decision of pennsylvania fire still rules and we never overruled it and we have a separate line of jurisprudence that has to do with minimum contacts than all of that. that's just another way to add personal jurisdiction. with pennsylvania has done is basically allowed operations to consent to personal jurisdiction which is something you can do. by deciding to register and do this in pennsylvania with his law on the books, that effectively means they consented to be there. the court also said until we actually overrule our cases, lower courts still get to do that for us which is a theme you see sometimes in supreme court cases were lower courts see the writing on the wall. . the other piece of decision was the idea that appropriations maybe shouldn't be treated -- the corporation should be t

donald trump put his stamp on the court with three justices, including amy coney barrett.ore justice barrett was picked for the federal courts and jammed on to the court despite an impending election, she was a paid speaker five times at the black stone legal fellowship. a summer program established to inspire a distinctly christian world view in every area of law. the blackstone program is run by alliance defending freedom. now if you're not familiar with the alliance defending freedom or adf, you are familiar with their work. they've been designated an anti-lgbtq hate group. the adfers and the colorado baker who refused to make a cake for the gay couple and been involved in the barrage of anti-transgender bills being considered in states across the country. the adf also wrote the mississippi law behind the supreme court's decision throwing out 50 years of reproductive freedom in dobbs versus jackson's women's health. and now they're behind the current case to kill the abortion bill mifepristone an effort funded by billionaires whose names you have heard or or who don't w

the dissent was written by justice barrett. she was joined by the chief, justice kagan and justice kavanaugh. that is needless to say a unique lineup. you can correct me if i'm wrong. i'm not sure i have seen that before. i'm not sure we will see it again. it was interesting to see. what the majority said is the 1917 decision in pennsylvania fire controls. we never overruled it. we have this whole separate line of jurisprudence under international that has to do with minimum contact. that is another way to exercise personal jurisdiction. what pennsylvania has done is allowed corporations to consent to personal jurisdiction. that is something you can do. by deciding to register the dude -- register to do business in pennsylvania with this law on the books, they have consented to be sued there. the court also said to the supreme court, until we actually overrule our cases, lower courts don't get to do that for us which is a theme you sometimes see in supreme court cases where lower courts seem to see the writing on the wall. the

. >> the barrett faculty took their condemnation campaign. publicly attacked lewis center donors. the barrett dean censored speech. >> laura: tom, censored speech, attacked the donor. that's you. >> that's right. having a problem that we have here is that the faculty at most public universities are given a complete free rein in the classroom and a lot of them are radical. a lot of them don't really want to teach. but they've also redefined academic freedom. that used to mean faculty's right to pursue truth in their discipline without opposition. but they change the definition of that do whatever they want whenever they want to whomever they want. they think they have the superior freedom that they can intimidate students and other people they don't agree with. >> laura: unaccountable. i want you to see what asu posted yesterday about free speech. >> it can be noisy and uncomfortable but in a free society, universities must be safe places that encourage civil public discourse. the heart of asu's charter is a commitment to inclusion. that means

jessenia hatti-barrett con mÁs detalles. >>> autoridades fueron alertadas sobre el accidente que ocurriÓrtado al hospital. vieron a los niÑos estar aquÍ. su abuela me dijo que se encuentra en condiciÓn estable. autoridades de fort lauderdale mostraron un aparato encontrado afuera como responsable. destacaron el alto grado de estos fuegos artificiales y el cuidado que se debe tener al utilizarlo. ocurriÓ en la 12 (nombre en inglÉs). >>> otro accidente mÁs, y segÚn las autoridades, sandra, creen que el joven intentaba encender ese tipo de fuegos artificiales, en algunos paÍses a ese tipo de explosivos les llaman morteros. >>> nuestra colega hablÓ con un experto de fuegos artificiales y dijo que la pirotecnia de fuegos artificiales es impredecible y puede ser como una grave que explota en tu mano, cinco dedos perdiÓ. el uso de pirotecnia causÓ incendios en el este de la bahÍa. un espectÁculo en el este de la bahÍa involucrÓ a cientos de personas. >>> atenciÓ paÁn,Á . >>> se reportÓ que hay comida en el mercado que tiene metales pesados en comidas. >>> hace cinco aÑos consumer reports encont

let's get right to nbc news correspondent maura barrett. what do we know about the deal? the details. >> well, guys, it appears that we're avoiding potentially what could have been the most expensive strike in u.s. history. so let that sink in for a moment, but this tentative deal that the two sides, u.p.s. and the teamsters union agreed to is tentative. it still needs to be voted on. the big sticking point that was holding up these negotiations was a raise in pay for part-time workers. they are going to be getting a bump. they really are still only making half per hour of what the full-time workers make, but they also did add in worker protections and other worker benefits, and so both sides appear very happy with this agreement, and actually, in the last couple of minutes, we got a statement from the white house, president joe biden saying that this agreement is a testament to the power of employers and employees coming together to work out their differences at the bargaining table in a manner that helps businesses succeed while also helping workers secure pay and benef

. >> cam barrett testified in favor of the washington state bill. >> when you google my name, simplyirst name. childhood photos of me in bikinis will pop up and i'm terrified to have those weaponized against me again. >> and is now an advocate for children's privacy online. when i did get on tick tock, i had no intentions of like being a creator or being an advocate for anything. >> i desperately just want a second chance at life and people were really like receptive to that and a lot of people resonated with that. and so that's kind of how like my platform got built. if you do have to include your kids, blur their faces, show the back of them, don't share things like their full names, don't share birthdays, don't share locations, don't share schools. >> cody knows not all families are willing to remove all content of their kids online, but encourages other parents to think twice before clicking that upload button. >> we can't avoid our kids living their lives. obviously we want them to do that. we can avoid them being shown to millions of strangers unnecessarily for no reason. >> ou

. >> alex barrett was there with him in detroit as well, too, so they tell the stories of a younger chris. he was not as mellow. >> i think that he has mellowed a little bit, maybe because it is hotter out there. but we mes with him enough that players know how he is. he is always going. >> with the red and gold report i am matt lively. >> the first game is against th raiders and the niners then pla the denver broncos on the 19th and then the chargers on august 25th. >>> still ahead, a line down th block to get one last pour. how the community came together before anchor brewing closed up there san francisco taproom. >>> remember that you can watch us anytime, anywhere on our streaming service. catchall newscasts plus the news and weather ap >>> beautiful day today. this weekend the community came together to toast anchor brewin one more time at their taproom in san francisco. they close their taps after being in business for more than a centur and our betty yu was there. >> reporter: the line to get into anchor taproom stretched down the hill at potrero hill. >> tell me what you got here

courts at every level, including justice neil gorsuch, justice brett kavanaugh and justice amy coney barrett. those three justices have literally transformed the court, durable conservative majority. three justices and a new majority that gave america a new beginning for the right to life. beyond our record in washington dc, you may not know as i mentioned i was governor of the state of indiana. the hoosier state is a lot like iowa. we demonstrated their you can balance budgets and cut taxes. before that, i was a conservative leader in the congress of the united states. i served for 12 years in the house of representatives. it seemed longer. i was there during republican majorities and during democratic majorities. i was the leader of the house republican conference chair the first time we retire nancy pelosi and i want to thank you for helping retire nancy pelosi once and for all. thank you, congresswoman. she is gone. i have been a congressman, governor and your vice president. in this time in the life of the nation, it is that experience that brings us before this podium tonight. the reas

you've got kavanaugh, roberts, and amy coney barrett in the middle as those swing votes. >> jonathan:avanaugh voting with the liberals more often than they voted with alito and thomas, but let me ask you, senator, about the big affirmative action decision. our poll looked at how people saw the court. most people are saying they think the court is acting politically rather than based on the law. in the supreme court's affirmative action case, you have a majority saying they agreed with the decision, 52%. only 32% saying they disagree. >> i think this country has always been uncomfortable with quotas based on race. you see that in the reaction and it takes a lot of explaining on why that needed to happen. i think what the -- what the universities are going to do in reaction to this is they're going to look at other ways to provide diversity into their student body. this is not over yet. it just simply says the way you did it is functionally not constitutional. not sure i agree with, that but there is a workaround on this, as there is a workaround on the student loan, as there is a worka

for more on, that i'm joined by lindsay barrett. she's a former assistant u.s.trict of georgia, who specialized in public corruption and economic crimes. she is the founder of the firm, apparently. lindsay, thank you for joining us this morning. >> my pleasure, ali. think. you >> i would love to rip apart my explanation about rico. we were trying to do the best job we can, but i want to get this as right as we can. what did we miss? >> really, you nailed it on the head. georgia's broader. georgia's rico is broader than the federal rico statue, and in some important ways, one thing i would emphasize, though, is that in the finding an enterprise under federal law, that enterprise has to be ongoing. it is usually referred to, these days, actually, you almost never see a federal prosecution where it doesn't involve an established organization like a gang. that is where it's usually used. in georgia, conceivably, the criminal enterprise could be as fleeting as a day or two. it can be a loose a volition, as people who come together for some brief purpose. so, for that

responsible for their overseas human right abuses. codes not only in africa have been at loggerheads with barrett gold. last active is an old old barrack has repeatedly said it has resolved but human rights issues and reports. human rights abuses have increased in recent years. the such that during to pull to and 5 of the shootings. and of course, the mining di and says it is full, but in this thing, we intend to vigorously defend against these allegations and the appropriate forum . it attempts to advance claims against barrick gold corporation in ontario based on alleged actions of the 10s in the end police. even though barrick exercises no control or direction of any nature over the 10s, any and you've been far in court for nancy and the survivors know that they face an appeal struggle against a powerful corporation. but it is and means resolute touching the barracks. dealings with the victims of violence by mis security and put these in popping again into zenia was primarily designed to protect the company from the legal action rather than when we have been raped and men who have been hurt or

to 2022, so if we kind of mark the death of ruth bader ginsburg and her replacement with amy coney barrett, is public agitation about the court. and you asked earlier about trust. the supreme court, for a long time in american history, had been one of the more trusted institutions. i think there's a lot of public alarm about what the jurisprudence of originalism really is and means. and that, part of that, i think in some of the dissenting opinions in this affirmative action decision have to do with taking the 14th amendment, which guarantees equal protection regardless of race, that is part of the anguished attempt, but also thrilling attempt to build a truly multiracial democracy after the civil war. what it means for originalists to read that language and use it to explain that there can be no longer affirmative action is, i think, bafflinto people. it requires a lot of inquiry. and i think that in itself is likely to be one of the longer lasting consequences. not just because of this ruling, but on the heels of the dobbs abortion decision, the bruen gun regulation decision. - so i thin

i suppose this gets into justice barrett's comments. that st getting to sound like a lot more, per se. >> i t mean to say that costs are relevant. i think costs are an important factor under pike balancing. are substantial.alleged >> the cost that are alleged are substanecause mr. bishop has a pbout the difficulty of segregation given the nature of the industry. that turns out not toe ue, this california than when? can california when? >> this cost of the individual pork prs have so, the ability to trace iss only part that question. there is allegations and decorations supporting the complaint and explain what would be entailed in expanding to 24 squat or ten -- group pans rather individual pens. the adverse effect that may have on both the productivity and the health of the sows and a lot of competing considerations. >> would it be fa say that you think california should lose this case? >> we havetaken a position on whether their health and fety rationale would prevail. but the fa that california has not relied on that in plausible all

amy coney barrett refused to opine on hypotheticals during her hearing.ne thing is clear, the scotus is corrupt. how hard is it to see that forcing people to do what they don't want to is bad? can people not think of their own examples where this could clearly be wrong? what if the twisted anti-gay organization from kansas wanted to force a gay web designer to work for them? darius is calling us from princes and, maryland, independent. -- princess anne, maryland. independent. caller: a caller, two or three calls ago said interest rates keep going up. i currently have student loans. unfortunately, we all know that having a home is for the middle class. the student loans prevent me from getting one. this whole suffering court student debt issue reminds me of the pig eating its tail. old people are sitting there, complaining about hey, government helps you and you shouldn't depend on the government to help you forgive your lungs. the only thing i can say to that is ok, if the national debt is such a huge issue and student loan debt is such a huge issue, i wi

. >> reporter: barrett's dad says they live and breathe niners football. >> if it's a good game it's all we will talk about and if it's a bad game there is not a lot of discussion around the dinner dinnertable. >> reporter: finally, with practice over, they started executing their plan to be called kittle's name to lure him in close, then bear went for the hook. >> i got to cheetos. >> reporter: it worked. bear reeled in number 85 for autographs because he already knew his favorite players favorite snack. kittle signed the jersey , and bear even brought his brother and sisters jerseys to be signed because they couldn't be here. >> this might be the best birthday present i have ever gotten in my life. and i am really happy about it and i love it so much. and, go niners. >> wishes are sometimes granted. bear and the rest of the faithful have one of the big wish for the team. they will have to wade through the ups and downs of another long football season, to see if that one also comes true. >> great story. thank you. >>> we are counting down until the 49ers hit the field for the presea

amy coney barrett refused to opine on hypotheticals during her hearing.ne thing is clear, the scotus is corrupt. how hard is it to see that forcing people to do what they don't want to is bad? can people not think of their own examples where this could clearly be wrong? what if the twisted anti-gay organization from kansas wanted to force a gay web designer to work for them? darius is calling us from princes and, maryland, independent. -- princess anne, maryland. independent. caller: a caller, two or three calls ago said interest rates keep going up. i currently have student loans. unfortunately, we all know that having a home is for the middle class. the student loans prevent me from getting one. this whole suffering court student debt issue reminds me of the pig eating its tail. old people are sitting there, complaining about hey, government helps you and you shouldn't depend on the government to help you forgive your lungs. the only thing i can say to that is ok, if the national debt is such a huge issue and student loan debt is such a huge issue, i wi

so i’d better give the opportunity to answer evgeny so eugene, you are back in the game of seed barretts a pinksloyd group pink floyd that's right, what's in the bank there, and we answer further or take it away, and then the next question, and the talking heads group officially existed until 1991, after 5 years it gathered again without a leader, david byrne. what name? did they take it? ah, but probably the answer is in the bank. the question is simple, the heroine of the film scarecrow comes to a friend to the song golatukhin go to him wrote the song american soul singer arthur alexander but the film uses a cover made by a famous band whose vocals sound, and john lennon the beatles the beatles there lennon sings john lennon he really liked this song. it was included in the very first beatles album out of 4,000 recorded in the usa in a bank . anatoly wasserman plays further for a certain period of time and, say , certain numbers, he usually says to take the bank. i'll take the bank money comes to the account of evgeny margolitsa and in the game anatoly question for anatoly blues singe

here with me in the studio devlin barrett covers the justice department for the washington post.eanne caldwell is the anchor of washington post live and co-author of the early 202 newsletter. and we have senior managing editor at politico. welcome to you all. thank you for being here. we saw these new charges against the former president not in the case we were expecting this week, but allegations that trump tried to destroy surveillance video. and a few other charges. tell us what we learned. >> what we learned is the prosecution case for obstruction -- obstruction and a cover-up in this case is previous then will be new. it involves another trump employee that allegedly set out in trump's direction to try to just -- destroy security fara footage according to prosecutors. that shows a broader group of people to engage in more alleged misconct. and it adds an additional card against former president trump with this tax document that is generated so much interest in part because he talked about how it was classified. this is more bad facts for the former president. >> bad facts th

that are coming forth right now for michael and the remainder of the 2nd turn that, that i think barrett entries is about about political choice to live with. the ranking really is to try to we support, right. who gets there and some of the issues that we're talking about now and then my whole wants to pass on integration. i'm deporting more on document. numerous. that's been something that he's been speaking about or recently talking, not finding delinquency. i'm talking about adding new work requirements for, for, for welfare recipients. these are all issues that i've only had some support in french society. also heard clearly and it wouldn't support for me. right. i think that's sort of the coloring that his presidency right now. is there a wildcard, which i'll just finish with is that is the government decides that it can't. it's not content with the answer to options. it could potentially call for new elections as all the national assembly in poverty lessons. that, of course, comes with the rest of it. so because there is no assurance that i'm not going to have a working majority in

and his government seems to be face that barrett. i pill a task, but i think it's very important that the 6 miles from the international community on the system. and i think here they'll have to do some trade offs between democracy and much more intrusive set all inclusive, the economic development processes and then support for the government to be able to deliver a very credible site to be valid and tech streams in new jersey, pollution is almost think in creasing by 4 to 50 percent, almost every 5 years. so. so that place is in vance. pressure supported in the government's ability to create jobs, to provided cation to provide l to provide the house. but there must be a balance around this. and that must be the conversation as to how governments that, and that they cannot be restrained with limited resources, are able to explain to the operations where the challenges that i blinked to provide corruption back as being a major challenge. but what's the frequency? and the most consistently, almost legitimizes, the military's design 8

abuses. communities in many parts of the world, not only in africa have been at loggerheads with barrett gold, over land destruction, water pollution, and the killing loss. active is an old old battery, it has repeatedly said it has resolved, but human rights issues at the mines, according to lawsuits and reports. human rights abuses have increased in recent years. the such that during 20212022, that happened at least 5 killings, 5 incidents of torture and 5 of the shootings. and of course the mining di and says it is old, but in this and it is riddled with an accuracy's. we intend to vigorously defend against these allegations and the appropriate forum. it attempts to advance claims against barrick gold corporation in ontario based on alleged actions of the 10s in the in police. even though barrick exercise has no control or direction of any nature over the townsend in police legal proceedings in for, in course nancy and the survivors know that they face an option to struggle against the powerful cooperation. but they have no other alternative for justice and means of resolute, especial

clarence thomas and recount some of justice thomas' key opinions in this book the feeble justice barrett is interviewed by john fritz he. watch booktv every sunday on c-span2 and by the full schedule on your program guide or watch online anytime at booktv.org. >> a healthy democracy doesn't just look like this. it looks like this where americans can see democracy at work, where citizens are truly informed, a republic thrives. did informed straight from the source on c-span. unfiltered, unbiased, word for word. from the nation's capital to wherever you are. because it the opinion that matters most is your own. this is what democracy looks like. c-span powered by cable. >> next, the senate judiciary subcommittee hears testimony on artificial intelligence being subjected to government regulation and