can be done, what needs to be done next year, and what might be possible given resources. and this year it's about, it's about emergency relief, which is costing around $3.00 to $3.00 and a half $1000000000.00 a year. it's about temporary shelter, which nobody has yet even started putting in place for up to. ready a 1000000 display people it's, you know, next year is about the end. it's about revel removal. hopefully starting on these other immediate, then you have a whole new stage next year, which is when you're going versus perhaps the people to start the building again. but even then you need something to boost the private economy. people cannot after the sort of trauma mass trauma. and the lack of service is the slow return of services cannot be expected to go back to work, you know, and do this. so we need a scheme, something like a universal emergency universal basically income scheme. so at least you know, before we start to rebuild the, we need 10000000000 in the next year or so. and that's, you know, even that's daunting in the lock as everybody said in the lock

you seem to be worried about the president being chilled.i think we would have a really significant opposite problem if the president wasn't chilled. if someone with those kinds of powers, the most powerful person in the world with the greatest amount of authority could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes, i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country. >> i don't think there is any allegation in in case. what george washington said -- benjamin franklin said we view the prosecution of a chief executive. what george washington said we're worried about factional strife. >> let me put this worry on the table. if the potential for criminal liability is taken off the table wouldn't there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while they are in office. the fact we're having this debate because they have said presidents might be prosecuted. presidents from the be

why would it be so bad for it not to be a jury question? it seems it would be exacerbated by having it go to a jury rather than a judge. >> i think some of them are judge questions that could be resolved on the face of the indictment if the department of justice ever returned an indictment that said, the issuance of this pardon or this series of pardons constituted obstruction of justice, i have a little difficulty hypothesizing it. a motion could be made that says, article ii precludes congress from regulating these activities, the indictment needs to be dismissed. if the court wished to attach to that kind of a rule appeal, then that would be a lesser safeguard than the one that my friend is proposing here. other kinds of defenses though really do intersect with the general issue. for those, i have a greater time seeing how the court could implement that. would there be costs in going to trial? yes. there's no perfect system here. we are trying to design a system that preserves the effective functioning of the presidency and the accountab

what did you or do you understand to be the point being made there about temptation being put in people made there about temptation being put in peeple? why?— made there about temptation being put in people? why? at the meeting ofthe put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of— put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of may, _ put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of may, with _ put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of may, with all _ put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of may, with all of - put in people? why? at the meeting of the 17th of may, with all of the - of the 17th of may, with all of the n and me, paula venables and others had raised the problem of there being lots of cash lying around in unexpected places and whether this meant that they thought that that led some postmasters into temptation and being inherently dishonest wasn't entirely clear that that was theissue wasn't entirely clear that that was the issue that they were raising, i think. and we never really got to the bottom of that but that's what the bottom of that but that's

despite what be being told to what you might be being told to believe on social media and all the rest it or whatever. despite what you might be, have your pumped social your head pumped with on social media, my boy cannot become my girl, however much he might wish it so. or people tell him it can be so. it is a simple biological fact that a boy cannot become a girl. a man cannot become a woman , and vice versa. and if woman, and vice versa. and if people had the balls. excuse me , people had the balls. excuse me, using it in that context, if people had the backbone and the courage to honest about courage to, to be honest about that biological fact, that simple biological fact, a lot of this mental health pain , lot of this mental health pain, a lot of these children's anguish would have been avoided because i actually where i do agree with you, jonathan, is in all of this . there are a number all of this. there are a number of children and it gives me goosebumps because i don't like the thought child the thought of any child suffering. there a number of suffering. there are a number o

it wants to be organized. so, since the ministry of home affairs is separate, i will give you this money. do you go and do your exploration or not? right now, if this money is returned, the ministry will be able to explore them we will have a jump in exploration at one time. whether it really wants a structure or not , the government must accept that the money it took from the government is not going back to the ministry. it is an investment. next year, it will be 3 times more. this is the change of approach. you may say that if there is a minister, he can do a lot of slandering, so let the minister come and let him, for example, instead of writing a letter once, 10 times, that is, slandering, which cannot be done with the structure, the approach should be changed, the head of the program organization, the head of the government should say it, sir. what the legislator said in the permanent mining law he said that this is 100. government salaries, not a single rial should be spent on current expenses in five pl

able to be helped into work. — so they will be able to be helped into work, but also the employer's, but also the employer's, making sure they have policies that allow _ making sure they have policies that allow people to work flexibly, to have _ allow people to work flexibly, to have reasonable adjustments and all that kind _ have reasonable adjustments and all that kind of support that's needed for people with mental health problems to be able to really find meaningful work.— problems to be able to really find meaningful work. thank you both so much for coming _ meaningful work. thank you both so much for coming on _ meaningful work. thank you both so much for coming on the _ meaningful work. thank you both so | much for coming on the programme. two strikes killed at least seven people including two children. russia hit a station in dnipro and another location. zelesnky says this is proof it needs more advanced air defences. which takes us to the $60 billion aid package int he us. now could see a vote in house of reps on saturday. let's speak to ukrainian mp mariia mezentseva. than

this must be it. so yes, southern california, san diego, they'll be closer to 40% of that sun being obscured by the moon, whereas in the bay area were around. 35%. going to get just a little bit more of the shadow, but very similar of us to us. and as you can see here it is. still clear skies. so i assume this is probably looking from one of tories down in san diego. and you can see that there isn't any shadow just yet, although i'm expecting here within the next 5 to 10 minutes. this is mexico to start looking more like someone is actually the first place at least on land that you're starting to see that shadow of the moon moving over the sun, which is just so cool to see this been really fascinating to watch. and i know it doesn't happen >> all that often where we get a total solar eclipse viewable from north america. and we've been talking about how you won't see this again for another. you know, 20 years 2044, that's one that's visible from north america is and then yet. so there will be eclipses

hoping it will be presented as. will be hoping it will be presented as this— will be hoping it wills. this has been a flagship policy of rishi sunak, the prime minister, to deliver— of rishi sunak, the prime minister, to deliver on his pledge to tackle the small— to deliver on his pledge to tackle the small boats that are crossing the small boats that are crossing the channel with asylum—seekers and refugees _ the channel with asylum—seekers and refugees. the fact that the uk taxrrayer— refugees. the fact that the uk taxpayer is forking out £3000 as well as— taxpayer is forking out £3000 as well as paying money to rwanda with this agreement, i think there is going _ this agreement, i think there is going to — this agreement, i think there is going to be? over whether the policy is worth— going to be? over whether the policy is worth it. _ going to be? over whether the policy is worth it, whether we are getting value _ is worth it, whether we are getting value for— is worth it, whether we are getting value for money. but overall, rishi sunak— value for money. but overall, rishi sunak

be.r i wanted to be karl malden. i want to be that kind of actor because the great craftsmen and the great artists and... there's less pressure as well. and the work is more diverse. and i've never been fashionable. nobody�*s ever made me into the next big thing. so, therefore, my careerjust carries on and on and on. and what's extraordinary about you, and i talk about the busy—ness because you have so many different roles, it seems, and juggling different parts at the same time, it's the diversity. for example, right now, you've got two big projects coming out — one, a film, a sort of biopic about the singer amy winehouse who died tragically young, and you're playing the role of mitch winehouse, her father. and, at the very same time, across the pond in the us, you've made a mini—series for apple tv where you play the american revolutionary politician john adams. yes. how do you get your head around such different parts at the same time? well, it was a necessity for me. because of my bac

know how to man, and that is my high supposed to be so well not being a bus that can be of them abusive to me. oh, okay i, i honestly cannot believe that i am hearing these words in 2023 but but, but i, but i mean you'll, you'll, you'll view points, let me get one last one. he had been abused with eagle and because of the eagle, the having game that you were born with, i don't know of is nature. that's why they don't fit 10 know to assess 17th. does that mean when the latest mickey higher income then the mind he feels belittle off without leaving that it'd be anything he feels like? no i'm i'm the one was supposed to to mikhail incom then hor, so push us forward because when we me i am power with me. i educate telling me i learned this aside to become better because come on with carrier children in our rooms for 9 months, which is huge. so i mean, we're on dustin relationship because we've gone with them for 9 months when they come outside and we've been with them and even the hoss wanting to, oh, we sometimes think of them as babies. the alpha as boss has already come on. the babies me

changes are being made. things are being done.little more can be done to make sure it's in an integrated way to make sure the deterrent effect is there, making sure our capabilities are filling those gaps. more can be done but more is being done. that is something we shouldn't lose sight on. defense spending will continue to go up. we are still in peacetime. when is the best time to build resilience? now. >> we tend to focus on the outcome of the elections. it's important to go back -- we've seen a positive movement in europe and i thought europe is willing to do more and invest in its own capabilities. that's a trend that needs to continue. that will more depend on the european elections. we have a couple big ones coming up. the europeans, including myself, need to come to terms with the fact this is something we need to do not because there is a potential of someone coming into the office in the u.s. but it is our security at stake and making sure we can defend ourselves and provide a credible deterrent without having to knock o

government but he would be, toe that's _ leaving government but he would be, too.nces asjames is too. that's sparks all sorts of consequences as james is just reflecting on. then there is a bigger— reflecting on. then there is a bigger picture, yes where does it leave _ bigger picture, yes where does it leave other political parties? but where _ leave other political parties? but where does it leave the question of the uk _ where does it leave the question of the uk and — where does it leave the question of the uk and its constitution and scotland's place? that has been the dominating strand in scottish politics— dominating strand in scottish politics and what is interesting is that in— politics and what is interesting is that in the — politics and what is interesting is that in the last year or so, as we have _ that in the last year or so, as we have seen— that in the last year or so, as we have seen the snp's fortunes wane, support— have seen the snp's fortunes wane, support for— have seen the snp's fortunes wane, support for independence has remained solid and s

and i'll be happy. it's very good. and i'll be happy i it's very good. and i'll be happy.ich i come from. yeah. lovely. >> okay. well, look. thank you very, very much, both of you. it's an absolute pleasure to have you both back on my show as well. and, look, we'll have to stay in touch on this because you know, this has been a massive issue at the election. massive issue politically , as massive issue politically, as well. so yeah. thank you very much. both of you. great stuff . much. both of you. great stuff. thank you. yeah, yeah. look, thank you very much to coco and simon there. i thought that was the real crux of it, wasn't it? what is the major deterrent going to be for sending people to rwanda? okay. it's not going to rwanda? okay. it's not going to be that it's far away. it's the fact that when they are there, they cannot languish on benefits on a welfare state. they're going to have to crack on.and they're going to have to crack on. and let's be honest, that's the main reason they're coming here, isn't it? travelling through a load of safe european countries to g

to be. these are also heterogenous institutions. i teach opinion writing. i have students whose views are all across the spectrum, which you'll find at this university and this institution. >> republicans attend columbia university, too. >> shockingly they do. and i've actually taught a few amazingly. none of these issues of substance were on display there. this was a kind of theater in order to caricature the university to further an agenda of kind of making it more difficult for our institutions to function the way that they have. >> yeah, i will say if we have time i would love to play an exchange between president shafik and representative rick allen who was asking if she wanted columbia to be cursed by god. can we play that? >> are you familiar with genesis 12. do you consider that a serious issue? i mean do you want columbia university boo be cursed by godlike the bible in. >> definitely not. >> okay, well that's good. >> it's like a very curious logic to somehow bring in white christi

but let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. the precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield. of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. in vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. the mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. a volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. let it simply be asked, where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? and let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. whatever may be conce

you know, everybody needs to be thought of and be kind to.ut for a long time, i think women have just been literally the ones that are supposed to succumb. and no one is thinking about being kind to them. and i can tell you in sport, no one has been kind to the women. we're just being told we're not entitled to what the men have still got. just today in the states, there was a bunch of five girls that were throwing the shopper in west virginia and they decided to, to say , we're they decided to, to say, we're not going to throw the shot, but because they just introduced a 14 year old boy who wanted to throw the shot. and instead of saying, okay, well, we'll remove the boy, they banned the five girls from the women's category of shotput . you know, i mean, of shotput. you know, i mean, it's outrageous. i don't know what girls are supposed to do. are we just supposed to say we don't matter? you know, and just move over? >> i think i think you're right. i think you're right that in the united states there are some extreme examples of this going

be more rain to come on wednesday, but for the time being, going be a dry being, it's going to be at. so plenty of skies and plenty of starry skies and that's going to allow temperatures to fall away much more quickly than they done more quickly than they have done of it's going to be of late. so it's going to be a colder start tomorrow with a risk of frost across eastern areas scotland, east areas of scotland, north east england as well. but everywhere is be on the chillier is going to be on the chillier side to start the day away from the far west, where we'll see the far west, where we'll see the rain move in quite quickly tomorrow morning. northern tomorrow morning. so northern ireland, seeing the heaviest rain thing, also rain first thing, but also cloudy some fairly cloudy skies and some fairly persistent across of persistent rain across parts of wales, southwest. but it's wales, the southwest. but it's into scotland , west scotland into scotland, west and scotland into scotland, west and scotland in where rain in particular, where the rain will quite persistent will turn quit

it must be passed . it must be used in the economy. it is correct to say this point , no one has any objection, no common sense accepts that the government should have a small effective supervisory role, in fact, a very small amount of the economy, and that only in the supervision sector, but in the details when we are going to enter guild by guild, in fact , we have to specify where and to what extent and to what extent , asalaf can have the freedom to increase the price? where can they actually control, in what areas, in what areas, can they justify the benefits of the people, let the people know about those people or small units that are violators that are sometimes found, all this should be specified in detail, in my opinion. guild by guild, now the guild chamber, the efforts that friends make, with the government itself, the ministry, the position and the competition council, and various issues that can now be done by the elements that can work, even with support and help the judicial branch of the food system, make this clear cas

there will be soft support, hard, passive support, any, but it will be. for the authorities, it is now necessary to build both institutional and legal mechanisms in order to move into the mode of building consensus, trying to form decisions as consensus. this requires dialogue and inclusiveness. accordingly, the decision, speaking already in the language of political science, consists in consultative and deliberative, so-called practices, that is, consultation with society and the inclusion of society and broad sections of society in... formation and decision-making is mandatory, despite the fact that the authorities in the conditions of war have the opportunity to implement these decisions according to a simplified procedure, we have to finish, thank you gentlemen for participating in the program, oleg sayakyan, viktor boberenko, were guests of our today programs, during the entire broadcast we conducted a survey, friends, we asked you about this, do you support mass mobilization in ukraine, the results of the television survey 67%, yes 33... no, on yout

be found to be protected. or does the statute across the board in such a wide range of applications, somewhat analogous to overbreadth analysis, infringe on the president's powers so we can say that? >> that set of issues seem important and may be difficult occasionally. they also seem not really before us in the way justice jackson suggested earlier. do you think they are before us and we should clear it up, here it is? what else could we do? how could we deal with this? whether or not there is this absolute immunity. >> i think the court has the discretion to reach that issue. it was not raised in the district court and it was not raised in the court of appeals. the analysis i would use to get there is a fusion of a couple of principles. the court has often resolved threshold questions that are a prerequisite to an intelligent resolution of the question presented. in a case like united states versus grubbs, the court reached out to decide whether anticipatory warrants are valid under the fourth amendment bef

that would not only be peaceful protest, it would be advocacy, it could be all kinds of lobbying. those things would be covered as well. i would say to the court, let us not forget that civil proceedings are covered here. the government is suggesting the court should unleash a 20 year obstruction statute on civil litigation in federal court's. i submit that is if we would submit that that is a very serious tool to put in the hands of prosecutors. we urge that the court reverse the d.c. circuit judge. >> thank, counsel. the case is submitted. >> more than 3200 students from

imagine it will be...n at they want to, so hopefully people will have a lot of fun and enjoy the value of being involved in the arts. {lita fun and enjoy the value of being involved in the arts.— involved in the arts. ok, janet, thank you _ involved in the arts. ok, janet, thank you very _ involved in the arts. ok, janet, thank you very much. - we're gonna take you live to the house of commons votes are continuing on the government's flexy preventability was he some asylum—seekers being flown to rwanda —— flagship rwanda bill. this is the second of seven votes taking place this evening. 0ur political correspondent in westminster believe the government will win this vote, and so that could mean, if he is correct, that by the end of this week the government will finally be able to push through their much controversial, much debated policy on asylum—seekers. that's it for the moment. i will be back after a short break. i am moment. i will be back after a short break. iam rajini moment. i will be back after a

asd earlier it could be the argument could be made. it would be a high bar butt is the sort of argument we would expect one to make under a due process decision. >> thank you counsel. >> mr. chief justice and may it please the court. in robinson the court held the government could not criminalize status respondent as coed here today that the city can criminalize the our narrow submission in this case is government cannot circumvent principle of robinson by making it unlawful for a person to reside in the jurisdiction if has that status. that's what the ordinances here do. a supply to someone who has nowhere else to sleep which is the ordinances are thection. equivalent of making a crime to be homeless whe ving in grants pass. although we think t nth circuit was right to recognize e re ple of robinson as implitein this ce, the court was wrong to award broad injunctive relief in the circumstances that matter in which it did. robinson principle requires the individual determination and the ninth circuit's failure to require such determina

the minority to be in on costs or reduce handling behavior or his name data. com may only be in to be documented. keystroke goes could be highlighted, go support, emitted future plans say hey q met unique social media platform, but no, just me do for my team home. gabriel. the lift down to give us the live groups in the christian in the youngest. and the most me see the most names sally seen will give you how to make document faced. the, i think networking messy be few minutes could be behind the job as it is, is i believe in we not, i, the, it's time for new ideas. it's time to ask you to save the giant big claim. here are the habitat as many species are in pauses, climate protectors, but these forest joins are under the trend around the world. ready its time to recognize that trees surround those next on dw margaret friedlander is a holocaust survivor. at the age of 19, she decided to return to durham a country she never wanted to set foot in again. her home. she fights for remembrance here in seo stock. she belongs to tell margaret friedlander in 45 minutes on d, w, conflicts, cris

i can't be more proudly than i am right now to be ukrainian.so what's next for zinchenko and the fighting, which has claimed tens of thousands of lives? every single day, i am watching some videos from ukraine with the kids, where they're hiding themselves in a bunker. and i was just trying to put myself in their position, you know, when i was at that age. i didn't have that, so i was living my proper life. and now, ifeel sorry for them because they don't deserve it, honestly. and, you know, just again, once again, you're just asking yourself, like, they're doing that for what? to achieve what? i—i cannot find the answer, honestly. you must have friends in ukraine with kids and friends also in ukraine who are fighting. what contacts do you have with them and how are they doing? every time, when i was talking to them, you know, i feel sorry. i feel sorry because i'm not there as well. mm—hm. i'll be honest with you. i really want to be in ukraine, and i...and i said to my wife and myfamily and, to be honest, the feedback is exactly the same, tha

asked to be excused, and being excused from the case, you think that this could in some way be a pattern? >> i mean, i think -- it is part of what danny was talking about, right, because we started off the day with seven and now we're at six and looking at juror number four, that could become five. i think when folks have more time to think about the gravity of this case, and this is what i'm hearing for a lot of folks in that overflow room as well, and think about the commitment that this case is going to take, and what it could really mean for this country, if you think about, this is history in the making, we may lose more, even though we thought this was a considerably quick timeline and we were going to be looking at the arguments on monday. one more thing, jose, i want to say, you did ask rebecca about the sandoval hearing, there was a filing by the people for this sandoval hearing, basically talking about the evidence that they would put forward if donald trump decided to testify. and all of it was about the establishment of his behavior. so, talking about, for instance, the judgm

we need to be honest it, be honest be honest about it, be honest about religious zionist about the religiousarty, honest about likud, honest what they for . honest about what they for. stand but the terrorism that they backed, the occupation of they backed, the occupation of the bank, that back. the west bank, that they back. i won't it, kelvin. won't have it, kelvin. >> we will be honest. have >> we will be honest. you have had it, i said. >> it was my most pugnacious panel >> it was my most pugnacious panel, coming up panel, and i lieth not coming up next. has been accused next. tescos has been accused of profiteering inflation profiteering and using inflation as charge you more as an excuse to charge you more money. plus rachel reeves continues fight my vote continues to fight for my vote by policy well, as you know, we're very lucky to live in this blessed country. a country that's economy is not centrally managed , not completely planned, and allows free market trade. people can enrich themselves through hard work. and there's no shortage of opportunity . profit shortage of opportunity.

as always coming up, you be forced to be a up, should you be forced to be a feminist? one judge thinks you getting you should. we'll be getting into the left is into that. and the left is cheering the jackboot cheering at the jackboot of state no, state repression again. and no, i'm talking about some i'm not talking about some irascible bolshie the irascible old bolshie from the stalin in a mariners stalin society in a mariners cap, but senior labour figures and oxford university leaders have it. well, we've been talking about rwanda and their lordships, and dave says. and not dave cameron. i don't think. but dave says the house of lords was far better when it was just hereditary peers. and carol says, don't reform it. abolish it. blair shouldn't have got rid of the hereditary peers. so it's very reassuring to know that gb news viewers very favour viewers are very much in favour of the predatory principle . will of the predatory principle. will they much in favour of they be so much in favour of being forced be a feminist? being forced to be a feminist? and judge in e

be doing that, and they won't be on that, the olympics will be doing that, and they won't be focusedthatey won't be focused on the flag. >> yeah, they'll be focused on that and they be making a that and they won't be making a fuss the on fuss about whether the flag on their tracksuit not true their tracksuit is not the true british colours . british colours. >> no, but i believe and i haven't seen the team gb kit and it will be out soon, that it will have a normal union jack on it, and this jazzed up one will be jazzed up one. be the jazzed up one. >> yeah, okay, yeah. be the jazzed up one. >> well, okay, yeah. be the jazzed up one. >> well they 1, yeah. be the jazzed up one. >> well they might. be the jazzed up one. >> well they might they be >> well they might they might be quickly it if it quickly revising it if it wasn't. great to see you, wasn't. mark. great to see you, mark there . one of our mark foster there. one of our greatest all time olympians. five olympics swimmer . greatest all time olympians. five olympics swimmer. up five olympics as a swimmer. up next, we're going to go

and there never will be.no other you or any of us, this is not the same thing as copyright. it is not the same thing we will use this to create more creativity on top of it later. this is about a person's legacy, it is about a person's right to give this to their family and let their family take advantage of the economic benefits they worked their whole life to achieve. from my perspective, this is intellectual property right that their blurbs protection, it should absolutely be protected after death. i'm waiting to hear a good reason why it shouldn't be, to be honest. >> in perpetuity, not at all, mr. twigs, make this brief. >> i agree with mr. duncan crabtree-ireland 100%. >> thank you. twigs, would you like to make a comment on that ? forgive me. >> i worked so hard throughout the whole of my career, when i die, i would like anything i created to go to my family and my estate that would have clear instructions of the weight i want to preserve my history and all of the art that i created. >> thank you. >> s

costs being spent on those people _ legal costs being spent on those people being _ legal costs beingurts?— the civil courts? they would have been taken _ the civil courts? they would have been taken in _ the civil courts? they would have been taken in the _ the civil courts? they would have been taken in the round, - the civil courts? they would have been taken in the round, i - the civil courts? they would have i been taken in the round, i suspect, both at post office and royal mail. forgive me for interrupting, this period _ forgive me for interrupting, this period of— forgive me for interrupting, this period of time _ forgive me for interrupting, this period of time we _ forgive me for interrupting, this period of time we are _ forgive me for interrupting, this period of time we are talking - forgive me for interrupting, this- period of time we are talking about, which _ period of time we are talking about, which mr— period of time we are talking about, which mr beer — period of time we are talking about, which mr beer has _ period of time we are talking about, which mr beer has e

fear this could be a vote loser.guest is lila rose, described as one of the fiercest anti—abortion activists in america. are her absolutist views turning america off? lila rose, in southern california, welcome to hardtalk. thanks for having me, stephen. it's a great pleasure to have you on the show. ijust wonder if, right now, you feel you are wrestling with the law of unintended consequences. you welcomed that supreme court decision to overturn roe v wade, but since that happened a couple of years ago, it's become clear that most americans do not want to see a woman's right to choose an abortion to be outlawed and overturned. that's become a big problem for you, hasn't it? well, to be clear, the majority of americans actually support abortion restriction, stephen, which is not the case for pro—abortion activists in this country. so those that are bewailing the overturning of roe v wade and planned parenthood are some of these very activistic, pro—abortion groups, they don't want any abortion restrictions. and as you

like, if to be in a man's if you want to be in a man's world, then be in it.think men when they hear words they don't like, can just and get a bunch of just go sue and get a bunch of money for it? >> yes. well, yes. >> yes, yes. no. well, yes. >> well it depends. if we're in scotland, it's just become a whole easier. scotland, it's just become a wh(yeah, easier. scotland, it's just become a wh(yeah, easwait, didn't johnny >> yeah, but wait, didn't johnny depp? johnny get depp? didn't johnny depp get some money for. >> i think so, but johnny duff got because he was falsely got money because he was falsely accused she a smear campaign. >> you can't legally, snowflake. you can't, you can't, you can't, you can't legally, you can't legally, can't legally legally, you can't legally slander right. she he won a >> that's right. she he won a court case and let's and let's be honest, should men talk in the workplace? >> women the ones that are >> women are the ones that are known talking about. that known for talking about. that doesn't work. known for talking about. th

can't be. so there's going to be some real thorough analyses taking place into what makes the jurors take, what their attitudes are, what their experiences have been in order to decide whether or not they make it to the next stage of the process >> you know, it's lawyers will go through list of potential jurors in advance when they get names right. and they'll go through and try at a anticipate possible strikes. right. i mean, i know another in other venues that's the case. then you get in the room and now they're social media and you can look up the people, see what they're, what they've posted, et cetera. so some of this would be very clear. but in the sense where you only get ten strikes per side and you can have hundreds of people in these days after days filing through as a jury consultant how do you strategize? how to save your strikes? >> so each side has ten strikes. those are peremptory is where they don't have to give any reason at all. and now they can't systematically strike jurors

force can which is in power will be different, or there will be none at all, there will be other new political projects, and most likely it will be so, and then it will make sense to measure different political ratings, well , summing up, i can assure one hundred percent that the monopoly in... for everything there will be competition between several political forces, which will then form a coalition in the parliament, this will be certain, because the era of monomajority, regardless of what it is now the political party does not matter, it is the majority, it has already passed, well, maybe this era will pass much faster than we think, not only after the end of the war in ukraine, but maybe even earlier. because it has been announced that a number of issues may be brought up for consideration by the session this week personnel issues, in particular regarding the resignation of three or four ministers and the prosecutor general, says people's deputy of ukraine yaroslav zheliznyak based on the information of people's deputy goncharenko, it is about vice prime minister iryna veryshchuk

be said ?l. yeah what elon is saying is, shouldn't be saying is, no, it shouldn't be either people. we either of those two people. we should as a community should all decide as a community and know, we all know what's and you know, we all know what's right and we can right and wrong and we can debate that's the only debate it. that's the only way you ever get through anything. you hear some of you you need to hear some of those otherwise those things out loud. otherwise they're just going to go elsewhere. they're just going to go els> absolutely. okay. well you're preaching converted preaching to the converted with me, are going to me, paul, but we are going to move now to another move on. now to another question. from question. this is from andrew. hi andrew. >> hi, andrew, should . should >> hi, andrew, should. should offenders from difficult backgrounds get lighter sentences? >> yeah. thank you. andrew for that. actually, andrew is a great name . great name.

and then they then they're being they vote and then they're being they're being obstructive . they'rell being obstructive. >> an insight or give >> give me an insight or give the viewers an insight, if you will. know, you're kind of will. you know, you're kind of mixing hoi polloi. all mixing with the hoi polloi. all of day out. i of these mps, day in, day out. i try avoid them. try to avoid them. >> well, what's people sentiment about this rwanda thing? >> energy there , the >> is the energy there, the motivation there? or are people just a past or what? just a bit past it or what? well, think there's quite well, i think there's quite a lot of what you said earlier. >> people excited. >> people were very excited. a lot quite on the lot of us were quite on the right. thought, it's a really right. we thought, it's a really goodidea right. we thought, it's a really good idea at the start, but that enthusiasm has been tempered by the establishment gumming up the works. been an amazing, works. and it's been an amazing, sustained act of obstreperousness , by the elite. obstreperousness, by

we they can to be the best employer they can be— they can to be the best employer the can be. ~ . ~ .ns. you do not know what you do not know. just to explain to somebody what it is like living like that. i have had some really dark days where i have got to the stage and thought, can i go on living like this? just talking to people, getting that level of understanding, i want to also emphasise that people who suffer with migraine are probably some of the most resilient workers you can employ. if you can get through life living with migraine, i walked around on a broken ankle. in days and i was still going into work. just by making small adjustments, you can make such a significant difference. as part of the problem that sometimes 5 people do not believe you believe people believe people a migraine, people think it they have a migraine, people think it is a bad headache? there is probably a lot of that. my personal experience is you can see it on my face. i have hardly had any time off sick throughout my career, despite battling this condition.— career, despite battling this condition.

so as i've says, be a policy, it will be some of it will be we want them and then they will be in douglas adwords . anybody you have that never, ever backed anybody. and that's how, because by me that's how because brian, look at it, we have the, we have the piece mix of the world. we want peace with everybody. and we want peace with that. others have amongst themselves, right? for that is up. and that is that because we have, we have no means we have no got the enemies. do you have anybody it'd be want to live in peace on that boundaries to be secure. it's a very issue of the what is called the proof to date, to fit it is get that every the engine at the ends in spot the i probably missed all the nice because one the b b ex model or that was in, you know, the, the foremost spot me, if of athens, i was always upset that spot, that is going to come and overtake them. okay. so that feel that we lose the primary position, the world in those days. the greeks well, the way, so it's called the skype right. that it's, it's be, it's the fear of and flipping bar shipping, most of the bar authorizi

let's be honest, there's always be, there's always going to be, trolls on media for whom trolls on social is no response. that is there is no response. that is the right response. >> they carried on to >> and they have carried on to this but i think one thing this day. but i think one thing that's interesting is that's very interesting is if you at the difference you look at the difference between responses, between the responses, buckingham palace came forward very fairly very quickly and gave a fairly candid happening candid idea of what's happening with what his with charles and what his illness kensington palace illness is. kensington palace didn't, i think that's didn't, and i think that's because william much because prince william is much more vein of never more into the vein of never complain, never explain, which more into the vein of never com hisin, never explain, which more into the vein of never com his grandmother's n, which more into the vein of never com his grandmother's motto, h more into the vein of never comhis grandmother's motto, his was his grandmother's motto, his

should be higher, should be increased, but so far this has not been done, so far there is no law that have legal force and increase these fines, as of today, those are still in effect, and what i see from the draft of this law, which, by the way, i finally managed to receive only today, but... i don't see an increase in fines, you know, i'm just briefly, because we have two minutes, you can do whatever you want punishment, but globally, if a person does not want to, well, sit and go to prison, well, in principle, a person will get out of prison sooner or later, motivation is also needed here, and here the biggest problem is demobilization for the military, everyone understands everything from the same on the one hand, on the other hand, there was no explanation for the society, i am now referring to the military, who have been at the front for a longer time, those who will leave now, they will also understand how long they will be at the front, they also do not know how long this will last war, will it be a question somehow? it is resolved, normalized, well, so that people understand,

because i might be cleverer, i might be more creative, i might be more friendly, i might be more confidentnd the person who is, as it were, average height, might be shy, miserable, in other words, not necessarily the citizen that we'd like. now, if we start saying they should be born, they should never have been born, we're going to draw the line here, i think we're going to not have some people who might contribute purely on the basis of really a very... surely our thinking has developed. i mean, crick and watson were �*53. surely our thinking has developed. and just listening to you and appreciating everything you've achieved is an important part, surely, of thinking about this whole topic. and yet you yourself wrestle with some of the difficult grey areas. for example, we're now able to run genetic analysis of foetuses and indeed in vitro embryos. and we can tell very quickly whether they, for example, carry the down�*s syndrome genetic material or indeed cystic fibrosis, some other diseases. and the decision oftentimes is taken to terminate that pregnancy or indeed to then destroy that

there saturday, were it be to be a disaster. there had saturday, were it be to be a disaster .been talk disaster. there had been talk about a problem the week after that. but but i can't see how suella braverman can affect that happening . someone like penny happening. someone like penny mordaunt may be drafted in, but this is kind of conversation which obsesses westminster but looks , i think, frankly, looks, i think, frankly, ridiculous to the rest of the country. so the braverman on on the radio this morning saying that these are only a token or a few flights won't be enough to prove it's working . she's been prove it's working. she's been very clear that she thinks this won't work. she will probably cause all sorts of difficulties, difficulties for the prime minister, but his battle now is with the house of lords. he said today. he's he attacked his political opponents. he said they used every trick in the book to block flights and keep the boat, keep the boats coming . the boat, keep the boats coming. so he is attacking piers. labour peers in the house of lords. but really

but would be. no, it'd be no. but it would be. no, it'd be lovely. i wanted to have a lovely. just wanted to have a lovely. i just wanted to have a lovely sort of family. family nights garden. nights out in the garden. i know, be lovely. know, that'd be lovely. >> don't think it's asking for >> i don't think it's asking for a be honest. let's hope a lot, to be honest. let's hope so. fingers crossed that it's a warmer summer this year. yes, right. let's a right. at 6:14. let's take a look at some other stories coming the newsroom. coming into the newsroom. >> former defence >> and two former defence ministers have the uk has ministers have said the uk has failed prepare for a failed to prepare for war in a whole nation endeavour. the outgoing armed forces minister, james heappey, said in the sunday telegraph that only ministry of defence officials turned up to an exercise to prepare for wartime scenarios, which was meant for the whole of government . he called on government. he called on ministers to do more to prepare for conflict at a murder investigation has been launched af

that will be difficult. >> it will be difficult.might not go to a party and they walk in and everyone's talking about the trial. good-bye. got to leave. the oath. it's very important when the judge gives that oath because as you said, you realize this is serious. i have to take this serious. >> i think it is impressive when you do swear an oath. how heavily it weighs on you and the way it can make you feel like you're serving a bigger purpose and maybe make you do things you wouldn't expect to do. not check your phone as much. the things that you would feel like you couldn't possibly stay away from. the oath potentially gives you a sense that there's something bigger to serve here and i need to try to be the best version of myself for this case. thank you so much. we're going to keep an eye on this and if we get more jurors or anything crazy happening, we're going to bring that to you. >>> up next, what's happening behind closed doors today in israel as the world watches for a response to iran's barrage of attacks over the weekend.

and let's be clear, be the case. a may or may not be the case. there has been some legal britain may be legal advice that britain may be in controversial of certain international not may in controversial of certain inteilet'synal not may in controversial of certain inteilet's be. not may in controversial of certain inteilet's be clear, not may in controversial of certain inteilet's be clear, that's may and let's be clear, that's because a war. every because it's a war. and every war involves violations of international law, international human rights law, because happens because that's what happens dunng because that's what happens during wars. they're messy. they're don't like they're ugly. if you don't like them, start them . them, don't start them. >> is the evidence >> tom, where is the evidence that civil servants are that these civil servants are going against british foreign policy? , from what i've policy? i mean, from what i've read, essentially they're trade union pieces that's there to represent their memb

be a complex operation. they run into been playing mind games with b is rarely rushing for the last week and a half and i think people have been enjoying it. and ultimately the is right in the regime has to face the consequences. it has carried out assassinations in iran over the years. it has a carried out to sabotage. it has repeatedly bombed syria against international law and targeted iran and its allies. and ultimately the regime. the genocidal regime attacked the iranian embassy and the un security in the un security council. the united states, britain in france, refuse to condemn this strike on an embassy. so there was no other way for them to directly punish this, right in the machine. they basically were asking for it. when you say that there is more to come, i will the response if there is more to come. indeed, will it be from radians, soil or is the expectation that attacks could take place from other countries in the region, syria, iraq, lab, and on, for example, as well. the attack from iran is