could we look at population between cole, grove, s chraeder, and hayes? sorry, not those blocks, but the one block right there. >> that is a population of 176 people, bringing the deviation to 4.72% -- -4.70% for district 1. slight change. this is a population of 176 people, it would bring the deviation for district 124 point -- -4.72% and the deviation for district 52 2.13%. >> we're getting real precise here. thinking would be to add to d1. i do not know of that works. something like that to allow the population for one man to to stay under 5% deviation. one and t garrido to stay under 5% deviation. -- one and two to stay under 5% deviation. commissioner schreiber: yes. commissioner pilpel: yes. commissioner mondejar: yes. vice-chair lam: yes. no. >> no. chairman mcdonnell: thank you. please make this change. >> could we get the deviation for one in two -- and two? >> the deviation for district 1 is -4.70%, the deviation for district 2 is -5.19%. >> could we look at the block -- let's go to the west. so this would be moving to 24th avenue. within that b

i am a homeowner on grove and have been a resident of the block between cole and hayes for 13 years. we were only notified our block was being considered for annexing 24 hours ago. i am brianna green. we have collected 27 written signatures and seven on-line signatures. we believe with more time we could easily get over 100 if not a lot more than that. we disagree with the decision by the task force 10 years ago to have removed any blocks south of fulton street. we emphatically disagree with the idea of removing -- we're physically separated from the richmond by a steep hill. we do not participate in the richmond in any way. our libraries and stores, everything we participate in is in the haight. we are a number of the panhandle. we're not a member of the richmond. [tone!] we're asking you to consider the other residences. they have 391 people. we have 309. their 64% white. we're 74% white. they are 27% asian. we are 9% asian. they are 4.8 hispanic. we are 6.8%. [tone!] their neighborhood more closely reflects the demographics of the richmond and they would be a better fit. we're not

cole bombing in the year two thousand and also we're going to break down the difference between and so a lot of people are asking if it is the new soap and and many ways it is but in some ways it can be well you can tune into the a lot of show that's coming up.

however, walking between the west wing and elb one night with ehrlichman, and one other person, there were three of us. may have been ken cole who worked for ehrlichman or may have been bud kroeg. no. i don't know. there were three of us walking along. i turned to ehrlichman, said john, you know, i'm going to be leaving here. but if you guys allow hunt to go to prison, to get convicted and to take the wrap for this, i am going to come back and talk to the president. i'm going to tell the president -- no, before i leave, i'm going to tell the president i want to be sure he pardons him, before i leave this white house. and ehrlichman didn't say a word to me. i never did it. i did it so ehrlichman would think i was doing it, but i never raised it with the president. later ehrlichman said i had done it. and the president went into a frenzy. that was december when he called me over to the white house, december of '73, and he's sitting up in the lincoln sitting room with all of the tapes out, transcripts in front of him, and he says did i promise clemency for hunt? i said no. are you sure? did i have a conversation with you in whi

cole? >> thank you. my question is about internal polarization as well, and etiology, aclu initiatives promoting digital rights and due process. is there a contradiction in values between your first amendment advocacy effort and pro-government regulation effort to advance consumer privacy and relatedly, is there a tension between the liberal values and pro-government progressivism within the aclu. if you want to take this opportunity to talk about health care as well, feel free to do so. >> go ahead. >> well, i have no credibility on health care, because i thought it would be an easy way and whatever else is going to happen it's not going to be an easy one. you know, this gets back to a comment somebody made at the very beginning of the panel which is there are times. i don't think it is the most prevalent conflict that we face. generally speaking our cases involve claims of individual right, some assertion of authority by the government. there are many circumstances we have to confront with or individual rights on both sides of the equation, and those are the most difficult for us. and i'm not sure there's a simple equation that enables to us resolve those problems. w