i know many of you may have heard about implicit bias. it's a theme that goes through all these essays and is at the root of so many of these killings and i'll talk a bit about that tonight. it was written by professor catherine russell brown. the next chapter is called policing, a model for the 21st century by professors tracy mears and tom tyler. tracy cerda president obama's task force on policing in the 21st century pick the next chapter is my own chapter called the prosecution up like me. i'm going to talk about that a bit tonight. then the grand jury and police violence against black men by professor roger fairfax. a lot of people are introduced to the grand jury after ferguson when they realize the police officer would not be indicted,, so he explains the history of the grand jury and reveals some things that will probably be very surprising to many of you who witness what happened with a lot of these police officers. very different than from ordinary citizens with the grand jury. the next chapter is called elected prosecutors and

there was a chapter for making implicit bias. and it shows that when you make people aware of their implicit biases it is the first step in getting rid of it. so there actually are very good implicit bias training on your pretty people doing and i recently went to a conference on this in washington d.c. within brought together many different people in the criminal justice system. the woman doing the training, there is a specific training for tryon get that there's a judge giving instructions to judges about implicit bias to make them aware before they make a decision. i do think training is a big part of it. at least a step. i will stop there. we will go to the side now. [inaudible] >> i am an elderly white woman and i thought i didn't have any bias. but i read this book and i found that i have implicit inherited bias from slavery. and when i grew up, i think we have implicit bias from when we did not think of a black person as a full person. we saw them as and a half person or - and i think that a lot of people glance over the f

is this a bias or is it something else involved there?>> thank you for the question because i want to answer it. so thank you for asking it. [laughter] it is something i've been thinking so much about i can't really figure it out either but i'm trying. after some of these cases, walter scott was running away with his hands in the air, got shot in the back like an animal. we saw that with their own eyes because it was videotaped. we saw garner being choked to death. it is hardly see this from your own eyes and i teach as i know what a murder is when i see one. and then to have in the case of eric garner 90 mean charge, in the case of walter scott, it came back a hung jury. and then in the case of shelby in oklahoma, too, show her shoot down terence crutcher with his hands in the air. not guilty! so in that, the question some of the jurors into i remember some of the jurors saying we are so sad, no one wins here and we didn't have a choice because the law requires us to find the person guilty and i'm thinking no! they did not understand bec

are we seeing more mainstream media bias? most outrageous, insulting, ignorant, and foolish things you've ever said. (hard exhalation) honey? can we do this tomorrow? (grunts of effort) can we do this tomorrow? if you have heart failure symptoms, your risk of hospitalization could increase, making tomorrow uncertain. but entresto is a medicine that was proven, in the largest heart failure study ever, to help more people stay alive and out of the hospital than a leading heart failure medicine. women who are pregnant must not take entresto. it can cause harm or death to an unborn baby. don't take entresto with an ace inhibitor or aliskiren. if you've had angioedema while taking an ace or arb medicine, don't take entresto. the most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high potassium in your blood. ♪ tomorrow, tomorrow... ♪ when can we do this again, grandpa? well, how about tomorrow? ask your doctor about entresto and help make tomorrow possible. ask your doctor about entresto at the lexus

if there is bias, we shouldn't investigate bias wherever it is. that is good. and then the response from the administration, no! it wasn't on the behalf of white students, we are so vindicated! i found it all to be very telling and odd moment. >> juan: i think there's a reason, chris. i think we live in a white majority society, where most college students are white. if you look at the population, it is more than a third of people over 25 who are white have a college degree, but if you look at white, it is less than a quarter, and hispanics, less than a fifth. you see there is a disparity. we worry about a stable american society, and i think that is why colleges have been quite intentional saying, we would like to increase diversity on campus. what you see from the supreme court, with sandra day o'connor in 2003, is to say race can be one factor, but it can't be the exclusive and only factor. so all of a sudden, you see the justice department, what was alarming to me was to see the civil rights division involved in this, because i don't see that there is any o

miller: that shows your cosmopolitan bias.you are trying to engineer the flow of people into this country. mr. miller: that is one of the most outrageous and foolish things you have ever said, and for yoyou, that is still -- the notion that you think this is a race this bill -- racist bill is so wrong a and so insulting. amy: that is white house senior adviser stephenn miller coming before the camera -- one of the few times he has -- ththough he was ofteten the warm-up act for candidate donald trump when he was on the campaign trail -- speaking with jim acosta. wordted to ask about that cosmopolitan. -- it was written the way miller leaned into the world cosmopolitan has a long history authoritarianism, especially anti-semitic advice. your response? ms. jayapal: i think it was. all of these are a signal in a minority base that delights in the idea of division, delelights in the idea that somehow we should take all the brown and black people out of this country. there is a small minority base that donald d trump has alwlways pl

what we're doing here as no bias towards any region of the world. it has a bias towards ultra high skilled individuals who can come to this country and stand on their own two feet. >> do you realize how democratic -- do you think you can really get democratic sponsorship given the current environment in congress right now? >> we don't like the current environment, but why wouldn't you support this? this is not an experiment. this is already proven to work. we're anxious to have dialogues. >> i would say, too, about democratic support and for that matter some republican support, look, we all know our immigration system hasn't been working for americans for a long time. that's why we propose this legislation about green cards. however, we failed as a congress in 2006 and 2007 and 2013 before senator purdue and i arrived to do everything under the sun on immigration. that's because people don't have faith in congress. what we can do, though, is take common sense incremental accepts that improve our green card system while also giving the american peopl

there's no bias towards any region of the world that has -- world. it has a bias toward high skilled individuals who can stand on their own two feet. do you think you can really get democratic sponsorship in the current environment? >> we don't like the current environment, nobody does. but why wouldn't you support this? it is progrowth. is pro-worker. this is not an experiment. this is proven to work. we are excited to have that dialogue on both sides of the aisle. democratic support and some republican support, look, we all know that our immigration system hasn't been working for americans for a long time. propose to this legislation about green cards. however, we failed as a congress , 2013, before07 senator perdue and i arrived, to do everything under the sun on immigration. american people have confidence in washington to deal with american -- with immigration. we can take common sense increment. that will improve our green card system while giving the american people more confidence that washington is finally looking out for their interests. an

we have no bias to any region in the world, it has a bias toward high skilled individuals who can come in and stand on their own two feet. >> do you think you can really get democratic sponsorship given the current environment? sen. perdue: we don't like the current environment, but why wouldn't you support this? it is progrowth, pro-worker, and is proven to work. this is not an experiment. we are anxious to have this dialogue with people on both sides. sen. cotton: i would say about democratic support, and some republican support, we all know the immigration system has not been working for americans for a long time. that is why we proposed this legislation about green cards. however we failed as a congress in 2006, 2007, 2013, before we arrived, to do everything on immigration. that is important because the american people don't have confidence in washington. that is why 60% to 70% of americans favor the principles behind this bill. we can take common sense incremental steps that will improve our green card system while also giving the american people confidence washington is looking

terry mcsweeney has the night off. >>> gender inequality and bias in the tech workplace have been the world's eyes focus on silicon valley tonight. a google engineer ignited a new firestorm across social media this weekend when a memo he wrote argued that men are more biologically fit to work and lead in tech. tom jensen is in the newsroom with the shocking details. >> not only does he sayre

i didn't really hear your answer about how you would deal with bias. the parallel to that, i would like panelists's comments on textbook selection and how as parents would we deal with what we encounter in some of the textbooks our kids use, history textbooks, when we know that there are things that should be there or a controversial, that sort of thing but how do you, what are your comments about textbook selection in dealing with bias? >> my own experience in writing mississippi's american indians, i mentioned one of the hardest things to do, to really get at the indian people who are living here and do you have to get good at separating what is somebody's opinion versus what they saw. if a frenchman says they saw people living in a certain place and describes a structure a certain way, that is probably all right. if they begin to talk about what people were thinking about, what was in their minds, what those for students. all of this -- we are indoctrinating students one floor another. and how to decide what they believe for themselves. >> the cynic

believe, we do a pretty good job of calling out the lies, misinformation, lack of priorities, absolute bias and ideology of the media. you are with them every single day. i don't know how you do this job, you've got to help us out. >> you think i have one of the toughest jobs in america, i think i have one of the most fun jobs in america. i get to work for the president of the united states prayed he has had an incredible first six months in office, he is going to have an incredible seven and a half years, it is an honor and a privilege to come out and share his message with the american people every day. i am excited to be here and be part of his team. >> sean: i want to ask you this, lately, the white house, yourself, steve miller, sebastian gorka, kellyanne conway, you seem willing to go out and say, we are going to call you out on air to your face. i doubt cnn is going to run the exchange with stephen miller today. speak out they may run an edited version, but my guess it isn't the one where stephen miller puts him in his place. >> sean: he really does. at any point do you get frustrate

the bia also romance way too many cases. when we make a decision we send it up to the bia. we don't really care what they do. they could affirm us, reverse us, we don't want to see it back. we have too much stuff for us to see them back. this happens all the time. if a remand the case, they don't ever have to take credit for the decision they make. i assume that is why they're doing it try to make us do it. , we need a proper judicial disciplinary system. starting in 2006 which is where the backlog problem began, the attorney general first of all subjected us to annual appraisals, evaluations which previously opm had waived due to our judicial function. so, that is a waste of time. judges were punished for things that are not punishment. judges were punished because a court of appeals would say that you made a mistake or he was rude. it's just crazy. judges were punished or could be punished for granting or not ranting continuances. no judge was ever punished for granting continuances. so, it's no surprise as appointed at continuances have been granted at a much greater lev

but still a lot of people who choose to identify as liberal refuse to see the very obvious liberal bias of most of our mainstream news outlets for some reason like they just cannot see it so for them i have yet one more piece of evidence to consider a woman named laurene powell jobs an organization the emerson collective are buying the atlantic magazine powell jobs is steve jobs where and in twenty fifteen time magazine named her one of the most influential people of the year and in her interview for time she spoke of her love for none other than hillary clinton this is what she had to say about her queen hillary clinton is not familiar she's revolutionary not radical but revolutionary she is one of america's greatest modern creation god that the new owner of the atlantic things hillary clinton is one of our greatest modern creation now forget that it's just a weird thing to say about someone it's a really weird thing for a news magazine owner to say about a politician in general i mean the job of the news is to take politicians to task not openly worship them but there it is our job th

whether or not there is a racially motivated bias, other bias, ideological one or a crimin criminal statsdoes his social media look like? manifestos, pr manifestos, perhaps? friends you talked of intentions about the day? an element of premedication. kpr a comprehensive look. >> what is the difference between the civil rights investigation and a formal terrorism investigation concluding this was allegedly an act of terror? >> they've been very difficult trying to ascertain between hate crime and terrorism. people look at them as very synonymous. legally speaking terrorist has to do with the act of trying to influence a civilian population or government through mass destruction, assassination, kidnap and other acts. you have to have an ideological slant behind it. a hate crime usually is tied to a bias other than ideology. race, religion. perceived gender identity or anything i just named. more of a bias than an ideological concern. >> the federal government is now investigating james alex fields jr., charged with second-degree murder? >> among other things by the state. the state has its

we get relatively balanced broadcast media coverage fasten a verse to cut through an override that bias in the process if i was a newspaper editor. in the murdoch empire or whatever thinking of years page after page after page for nearly six weeks of demonstrations jeremy called and and it hasn't so maybe i'm with i just got back to reporting the news that would be quite helpful for up democracy the balanced media broadcast restrictions are now ended there that the election has happened you expect the broadcast media to continue to be as fair to you i would expect them to live up to the standards that the general public now now want which is fair fair coverage proper debate and move away from personalities to culture and policy and whatever happens you think renationalisation of monopoly utilities and the attempt to stop people having to use food banks is firmly on the political agenda manifesto for it to be extremely popular and we tested a number of individual poll. susan powell's other did and proved to be extremely popular i think because people felt that their martinson of the wate

know what cosmopolitan bias means, but does he not like "vogue" magazine? >> there's a big concentration in the cities. so they say that people have a bias if they live there. >> steven miller being from santa monica. >> cosmopolitan. >>> president trump has reluctantly signed a new package of sanctions against russia but he called it seriously flawed. >> the president approved the legislation behind closed doors and coupled it with a scathing statement accusing congress of encroaching on his authority. the veto-proof measure prevents the president from lifting the sanction without consent from congress. >> despite the criticism, he said he signed it for the sake of national unity. >>> and attorney general jeff sessions is apparently out of the woods at least for now. sources say president trump's new chief of staff john kelly told sessions that his job is safe and that the white house is supportive of his work. with sessions for recusing himself from the russia probe, he also unleashed a series of blistering tweets. calling sessions beleaguered and weak. >

so, we have what's called the population bias. and this graph really clearly shows this population bias. this is distance to nearest city center ands this the number of tornado reports scaled boy an area of 10 square kilometers. how many tornados do you see within 10 square kilometers? as a function of distance from a city, every city, this is every city, and you see a higher rate about, between 1.2 and 1.4 tornados per 10 square kilometers and near the city to less than one about .8 away from the city. now, if you want to go out and say cities cause tornados, you can get front page headlines, right? but clearly, you probably want to step back and say, is that the causal mechanism? maybe i've got this thing backwards, right? of course, it's likely that this is due to the fact that people say, well, the cities, the cities are where people can report, it's an efficient mechanism of getting observations into record books, and so, what's what we're seeing here, but what's really interesting, i did the same thing in 10-year periods sta

we have a population bias. this graph clearly shows this population bias. this is distanced to nearest city center. this is the number of tornado inorts scaled by an area square kilometers. so this is within 10 square kilometers, a function of distance from a city, every city. this is every city. and you see a higher rate, tornadoes, and 1.4 per 10 square kilometers and near the city to less than one, about .8 from the city. if you want to go out and say cities cause tornadoes, you can get front-page headlines, right? but am clearly, you probably want to step and say, is that the causal mechanism? maybe i have this backwards. it is likely that this is due to the fact that there's people say that the cities are will people can report it, and efficient mechanism of getting observations into record books. so that is what we are seeing here. the what is really interesting, i did the same thing and 10-year periods, starting with 1961 to 1970, going to decades in one year at a time. ast do you see in this plot you go down? a couple things. very interesting. ok? t

trust for bias against corbin what did you think what did you think of the way france is the b.b.c. was done by the b.b.c. just told you i didn't i didn't i did i don't believe that the british media in general have been. to. any particular violent attacks that he's had to with. literally ordinary people have rejected. decided to look at policies look at a genuine honest man and give them a reward reward i believe will be a step towards governments in hopefully the not too distant future you're kind of getting out in banks in the bad boys of bricks a tool chain is milne anything in the corbin team yes be unconventional take risks and make the public and what do you think of the european politicians your colleagues in the e.u. parliament will of now be thinking about negotiations with a call to be hoping they'll be absolutely over the moon they will see a weakened british prime minister and they will see that already you know the indications are that the bracks that position that is going to be significant backsliding on it so if if we're really at the british government really is go

-- are they the victim of a geographic bias or did they create their own geographic bias? i look at this and say this is what you do when you stop campaigning. they didn't even bother to recruit a candidate in alabama, special senate election. on september 15, they're going to real iize they made a mistak there. they're not even trying to compete in some parts of this country anymore and they don't even pretend otherwise. >> well, look at who the democratic party's leaders are. nancy pelosi from carr, chuck schumer from new york. hillary clinton won those two states by 6 million votes combined. i'm not saying there's anything terrible by either leader's strategy. but when it comes to the party's branding and the messaging, look at the results in 2016. it's not a coalition that can win the breadth of how and senate seats that the party 10 or 20 years ago could. >> do democrats look at this, should they say this is what gerrymandering did to us, or should democrats sit there and lambaste their own leaders going, you know, this race to be -- race to the coast, race to urbaniz

it reveals your cosmopolitan bias to a shocking degree that in your mind -- no, this is an amazing moment. this is an amazing moment, that you think only people from great britain or australia would speak english is so insulting to millions of hard-working immigrants who do speak english from all over the world -- jim, have you honestly never met an immigrant from another country who speaks english outside of great britain and australia? is that your personal experience? >> of course there are people who come to our country who know english. >> that's not what you said. it shows your cultural bias. >> it shows how you try to engineer the ethnic people coming into this country. after that exchange, wolf, he referred to me as being ignorant and made some other comments there. as you know, wolf, generations of americans have come into this country for decades not being able to speak english. they take classes such as english as a second language. stephen miller is right, when you're naturalized, they do want you to have some english-speaking skills. that, of course, is at the end of the proc

it reveals your cosmopolitan bias to a shocking degree. this is an amazing moment. moment, thatazing you think only people from great britain australia would speaking wish is so insulting to millions of hard-working immigrants from

during this campaign well i think the bias of the media spin something has been regressive including the b.b.c. and i hope that what will. this particular election as the. rejection of the negativity that the turris and the british media of try to protract surely it's time for us to get back to come across a debate where those differences i don't know how difficult it is to take knighthoods a right but i think we could be happy that he got his knighthood last time because this time he wouldn't even get a caustic lorica answer berger's just here was done by the b.b.c. trust for bias against corbin what did you think what did you think of the way for instance the b.b.c. was done by the b.b.c. child i've just told you i didn't i didn't i didn't i don't believe that. the brits .

what factor is built-in bias in favor of the gop going into the midterm? guest: this is an is to work prorepublican bias in the the housenal math is and senate. hillary clinton won the popular vote and donald trump won the median.strict we went back over the course of the last century, and we could not find a gap that large in either body of congress. a couple of reasons, in the house, you have gerrymandering and republicans had unprecedented control over redistricting after the 2010 tosus they used that power draw lines favorable towards republicans. let's be honest, democrats would have done the same thing had they been in charge. you also have clustering of democratic voters to a degree. hillary clinton one the popular vote but only carried 490 of the american counties, so you have it very clustered and that allows republicans to have a natural advantage when it comes to winning the majority of districts because democrats are wasting votes in urban seats. there is a longer-term trend that helps republicans in the senate. the senate has been in favor of

it has more bias than anything else. this lets everybody compete individually. and have au do situation where everyone is the same to get into this country where they qualified? it has been proven in canada and australia. the very popular there. sen. cotton: let me finish up one example of that, the diversity lottery. it is cross-dress. it is no human purpose, does not even really serve diversity because the fastest over the past few years has been europe. will we are leaning towards is no bias to any region in the world, high skilled individuals who can come in and stand on their own two feet. you really think democratic sponsorship given the current environment? sen. perdue: we don't like the current environment, but why you support this? it has been proven to work. this is not an experiment. we are anxious to have this dialogue with people on both sides. sen. cotton: i would say about democratic support, and some republican support, we all know the immigration system has not been working for americans or a long time. that is why we proposed this legislation a

it reveals your cosmopolitan bias to a shocking degree that in your mind. no, this is an amazing moment. this is an amazing moment he think only people from great britain or australia would speak english is so insulting to millions of hard-working immigrants who do speak english from all over the world. jim, had honestly never met an immigrant from another country who speaks english outside of great britain and australia? is that your personal experience? that's what you said and it shows your cosmopolitan bias. >> -- the ethnic vote people into this country. >> that is one of the most averages come ignorant and foolish things you've ever said. lauren: adam shapiro has more from the white house. reporter: good morning, ladies spirit all the events, tax reform car racing the debt ceiling come immigration is now front and center with the president endorsing legislation that would streamline the legal immigration process into the united states. it does come with some controversy because some republican thumbnail are in favor of what has been proposed. it would

. >>> a new commercial explores the issue of racial bias in this country and it's drawing both praisend explores the issue in the past and present and was produced by one of america's best known consumer products companies. we get more tonight from nbc's reporter. >> it's not fair. >> reporter: the ad takes direct aim at racial bias in america. >> remember, you can do anything they can. >> reporter: and strikes a raw nerve. >> you are not pretty for a black girl. you are beautiful, period. >> reporter: proctor and gamble launched the new ad campaign called "the talk" two weeks ago online with depictions of conversations between black mothers and their children. instead of promoting the products it's known for, it wants to spark conversation, one scene shows a woman pulled over. >> when you get pulled over -- >> mom, i'm a good driver. don't worry. >> this is not about you getting a ticket. this is about you not coming home. >> reporter: in a statement, proctor and gamble writes, bias is universal and inherently human. acknowledging and understanding it allows us all to work together t

ripped off and that had enough of them especially thank you very much len what do you think of the bias of the b.b.c. during this campaign well i think the bias of the media spin something has been regressive including the b.b.c. and i hope that what will a minute shouts of this particular election as the. rejection of the negativity that the turris and the british media have tried to protract surely it's time for us to get back to democratic debates and with those differences i don't know how difficult it is to take knighthoods a right but i think we can be happy that he got his knighthood last time because this time he wouldn't even get a caustic out for door laura kearns burgers just here was done by the b.b.c. trust for bias against corbin what did you think what did you think of the way for instance the b.b.c. was done by the b.b.c. trust i just told you i didn't i didn't i didn't i don't believe that. the british media in general have been if. to jeremy corbin in particular the violet tax that he's had to put up with on the license literally ordinary people have rejected. decided

. >> it reveals your cosmopolitan bias to shock degree nat your mind -- this is amazing case case it's so insalting it millions of hard working immigrants who do speakish lush. >> he woymented to promo on sat uof liberty. so let take a moment and enjoy the back and forming on that. i don't want to get off into a whole thing about history but the statue of liberty is sim poll of liberty anden lightning the word. the poem you're referring to was added later. not actually part of the original >> more fundamentally. >> i'm saying -- i'm saying the negotiate i'm sorry saying the negotiate. >> i'm sorry. >> no it's okay let me ask you. >> now as for bill it dace faces strong opposition imgrant rights and gop senator lindsay gram suspected it would be devastating u.s. attorney. >> really he deposit have a choice. the bill patsed enough to be made meet owe. the president is not thrilled to the bill. and unlike other quills he doesn't have the signing air moany just released it in the form of a statement. calling it "seriously nowedment brought a big company as president can make foreign deals

at least population bias in the sense of gradient. i can do distance.i put the roadway network in there and i said okay, does the roadway give you better coverage. i can play those what if games with the information i have. that's why, i think getting back to this idea about theory and data, if you have theory you can start doing things a lot stronger. if you're just playing with dat data, those are the caveats, buyer beware. two quick questions. who are your partners in researching those tornadoes and hurricanes, and then second to that, in this area, one of the things is to sort of show them increasing in the area. you see them using it. >> that's a great question. it's really not simple to answer. first of all, about the people that i work with, as i mentioned carrie emanuel, he's one of the guys i can lean on. he is at the proper distance from me. were not friends, but were good colleagues. i pay attention to his work and he pays attention to mine. they've drilled down in coastal regions and looked for deposits and historic hurricane events. [inaudi

what we're doing here has no bias towards any region of the world. it has a bias towards ultra high skilled individuals who can come to this country and stand on their own two feet. >> -- democratic. you can get democratic sponsorship. don't like the we current environment. why would you not support this? this is not an experiment. this has been proven to work at we are anxious to have those dialogues with people on both sides of the aisle. sen. cotton: i would say about democratic support and some theblican support, we know immigration system has not been working for americans for a long time. that is why we propose this legislation about green cards. however, we failed as a congress in 2006, 2007, 2013 before arrivedperdue and i to do everything under the sun and immigration. that is because the american people do not have confidence to do with immigration. 62% of americans favor the principles behind this bill. what we can do is take common sense incremental steps that will improve our green card system while also giving the american people more c

what we are doing has no bias towards any region of the world. ultra highas towards school individuals who can come to this country and stand on their own two feet. reporter: do you feel you can sponsorship?c progrowth, pro-worker. this is not an experiment. it has already been proven to work at we are anxious to have the dialogues on both sides of the aisle. >> and i would say, about democratic support and some republican support, look, we know there immigration system has not been working for americans for a long time. that is why we have proposed this legislation about green cards. however, we failed as a congress 2007, and 2013, before the two of us arrived, to do everything under the sun on immigration. the american people have confidence on washington to deal with immigration, that his wife the majority of americans favor the principles behind this bill. take commonsense, incremental steps that will improve our green card system while giving the american people more confidence that washington is finally looking up for their interests. maybe

or a law enforcement -- you can't state a claim for racial bias in the criminal justice system today. so many of the racial profiling cases that i was litigating 10 years ago tended to be filed. the u.s. supreme court has close the courthouse doors to claims of racial bias in every stage of the criminal justice process from stops and searches to plead for -- bargaining and sentencing. in so many ways the u.s. supreme heart has effectively immunize the system of mass incarceration from judicial racial bias much in the same way the u.s. supreme court once rallied to the defense of slavery and rallied again for the defense of jim crow in earlier eras. but of course just being swept into the system with little hope of being able to challenge the bias or cat asked that got you there is just the beginning for so many because once you've been swept in a branded a criminal, a felon you were then ushered into a parallel social universe in which the very rights supposedly run in the civil rights movement loan -- no longer applies you. you may be denied their right to vote depending on the stat

the sharing of bias and false news has become all too common on social media. more alarming national media outlets, without checking. unfortunately some members of the national media are using their platforms to push their own personal bias and agenda to control exactly what people think. this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. >> now it would be one thing if sinclair is up front about its own agenda and bias. most don't know whether sinclair owns their station or if local anchors are reading to what amounts to pro trump propaganda between sports and weather. now the trump administration is poised to reward sinclair by changing fcc regulations to allow the company to own more stations. that is next. you got a home l, you got robbed. i know-- i got a loan 20 years ago, and i got robbed. that's why i started lendingtree-- the only place you can compare up to 5 real offers side by side, for free. it's like shopping for hotels online, but our average customer can save twenty thousand dollars. at lendingtree, you know you're getting the best deal. so take the

fascinating because we'll talk about the media bias. you said the social media bias is far more dangerous. >> guest: the good news is no one trusts journalists anymore. i didn't do it to them, they did it to themselves and misrepresented things like wall-to-wall coverage when there is no evidence that americans might actually want to know about. you can't trust any major broadcast news network to tell you what is going on in your own country and americans are responding to the polling. people voted for trump that don't like command when interviewed they say i realized nothing was off and i just stopped listening to the noise. that is what i think is coming for every journalist everywhere if they don't raise their game and -- that problem is nothing compared to the threat of the silicon valley and the politics that are even crazier than the politics of mainstream media that's like the left almost exclusively on everything. because of the language he uses he's smashing through political correctness which of course i love. crescent a close

into the negotiation came into a mediation really prepared to confront her own lack of knowledge and bias and so as a result we were able to reach this very creative agreement so obviously you close down this property rights argument this personal choice argument this this argument the gee whiz this is how i see the world and i should be able to see the world is choose and i suppose your argument is a very logical argument that is if everybody did that it would interfere with commerce all over the united states and to some degree i guess the commerce clause comes into this and you say no it's not always personal choice we are society we all work together we live together it's important we all cooperate together in order for commerce to work and i know i've heard that well argued i'm sure your department on the same thing but i'd like to branch out discuss more broadly report that your department in an air b.n. b. agreed earlier this year to conduct fair housing tests is there a general reason for that what are these tests look like what's your take on. sure so this was a a pretty unique a

during this campaign well i think the bias of the media spin something has been regressive including the b.b.c. and i hope that what will. this particular election as the. rejection of the negativity that the turris and the british media of try to portray surely it's time for us to get back to them across a debate where those differences i don't know how difficult it is to take knighthoods are right but i think in crowds we could be happy that he got his knighthood last time because this time he wouldn't even get a caustic. lorica answer berger's just here was done by the b.b.c. trust for bias against corbin what did you think what did you think of the way for instance the b.b.c. was done by the b.b.c. child i've just told you i didn't i didn't i didn't i don't believe that. the british media in general of been if. to jeremy corbin in particular the violet tax that he's had to put up with on the license that literally ordinary people have rejected. decided to look at policies look at a decent genuine honest man and give them rewards and the rewards i believe will be a step towards go

[ding] >> sean: we will see how rampant this bias is. let's take a look at the press claiming that the president is unfit to serve. they all echo each other. take a look. >> your behavior is causing great concern alone among the of the american people. [ding] >> is he suffering from some kind of illness? [ding] >> is he fit for office? [ding] >> the only explanation for his narcissistic behavior would be early onset dementia. [ding] >> may be? she's not the only one saying it. some people have been saying that for months. [ding] >> is he fit for office? [ding] >> no, absolutely not. >> an astounding chain of lies tied together by a lunatic who is mentally unstable. [ding] >> that is not seen behavior. the only defensible excuse and explanation is if he is not mentally well. [ding] >> a man who suffers from a clinical form of idiocy. [ding] >> do think the president is stable? [ding] >> no. [ding] >> sean: this is the new standard on cnn, nbc. apparently they have no standards anymore. of course, the slanderous smears don't stop there. th

why is it 99% of cases from the trial level are appealed to the bia? there is no cost to the illegal alien. the filing fee is very low to file an appeal. hais $110 according to judge lman's testimony to the judiciary committee. that is waived by the bia. the alien is not charged for copies of the records or the transcripts. all of these costs are paid for by the department of justice and that means, american taxpayers. american taxpayers are subsidizing the appeals cost of all of these cases. something that does not happen if an ordinary u.s. citizen is involved in a federal lawsuit against the federal government and has to appeal the case. stop thenothing to filing of frivolous and meritless cases. 's testimony was that the vast majority of cases were frivolous appeals filed with the intention of delaying the removal of the particular alien. that needs to be fixed. those costs should not be waived. the rules should be the exact same as in the federal court system. that is the fair thing to do and something that needs to be changed. the other thing not

it shows your bias. i want to say -- >> you're trying to engineer the racial and ethnic flow of people into this country to -- >> that is one of the most outrageous and insulting ignorant and foolish things you've said. for you, that is a really -- the notion that you think that this is a racist bill is so wrong and so insulting. >> neil: all right. that went a little off subject and the whole english thing was aside set to a bigger attempt on the part of the administration working with senators david purdue and tom cotton from georgia and arkansas respectively to change the way we go about letting people in this country on a legal immigrant basis. those that get visas to work in this country as well, that we've been low-browing to it talk to one analyst, that we should go for those with a certain skill set and those that can offer something advantageous to the united states from the get-go. proponents of this attempt said would be going back to the case of the last century where germans would come with

[ crosstalk ] >> that's not what you said and it shows your bias.ust want to say -- >> sounds like you're trying to engineer the racial and ethnic flow of people into this country. >> that is one of the most outrageous insulting ignorant and foolish things you have ever said and for you that's still a really --the notion that you think that this is a racist bill is so wrong and so insulting. >> the senators who sponsored the bill are confident there will be by part support. at this point, it's unclear if the bill has enough support to become a law. the "raise act" would also cut the number of refugees admitted each year from 110,000 to 50,000. allen. >> thank you. >>> the u.s. air force just showed off its military strength launching an unarmed missile in the face of growing threats from north korea. it launched from vandenberg air force base in santa barbara county. weijia jang reports. >> reporter: during an announcement touting immigration reform of, president trump made no mention of the sanctions bill he reluctantly signed earlier in the day. i