attacks, including those directed at members of our editorial office, well , we basically saw the bigus case, which also showed the value of independent journalism for this country and the reaction, the healthy reaction of society, that such attempts to discredit them will not be successful. and in fact it is wrong, what i would like to say here, well, first of all, i absolutely understood what journalism, investigations, independent journalism in the conditions of a full-scale invasion, in the conditions of wartime, and martial law, of course, for some reason fulfills the role of a healthy opposition, because the parliament, for example, should be united now, and even people's deputies from opposition factions are now telling us: that you, journalists, investigators, are one of the best oppositions in this country, because the parliament must show unity, the parliament must vote, the parliament must make important decisions and there must still be some moratorium on internal strife, and journalists are now actually a balance that controls the government, and this is a very important su

one more issue that i wanted to touch on, the bigus team's investigation has just come out about the fact that 273 million hryvnias from the budget of the verkhovna rada is allocated to... a company that produces content for the state tv channel of the rada, well, that's about it in the investigation itself, i think you have seen it too, there is a lot of all sorts of interesting things, this movie cat, by the way, is controlled by kyrylo tymoshenko, who has not yet answered, by the way, what happened to the american car that he repaired for his needs, where and car, they made a movie about it, well, i won't say anything about the car, that's kyrylo. before the dismissal, i wrote that it was being used for its intended purpose, but for what purpose, well, that remained in parentheses, i saw the investigation, so far we... we did not analyze, we did not communicate with the editors rada tv channel, but we will definitely ask this question, in the end it would be reasonable to invest resources in - actually in this channel, and if people were satisfied with the quality of the communica

necessary that these testimonies, in particular those of the persons mentioned in the investigation of bigus-infod to supplement the evidence base and will be needed, then of course they will conduct it. that is, the sbi is ready to interrogate andrii yarmak and his deputy. if there is a need for it? actually, i gave the answer to this question, i will not decide who to interrogate, who not, for the sbi there are people who cannot be touched? no, there is no such thing, it means that you do not rule out that andriy yarmak can also be interrogated, for example, if the investigation considers it necessary to interrogate those or other persons who were mentioned in the journalistic investigation, it will be done, all in boundaries law, but that's an argument, right, when journalists specifically mention the president's office in their investigation? not clear, is this again, or is this an argument? yes, is it an argument for the investigators, it is the investigation will determine whether it is already an argument or not, ugh, i thank you very much, i hope that i will be back for a while, and you w

possibility to park in korka stands on the cross, so according to braginsky , well, we saw the first part of bigusations, obviously our journalists do the work that should be done by law enforcement agencies, but it's good that... they are there and at least someone does this work actually does, secondly, this is only the first part, as i understand it, the most interesting thing will be in the second part, but at the moment he has already been suspended, mr. broginskyi from his position, and this means that he is deprived of the opportunity to influence the documents there, and others evidence that the investigation should remove in the process. investigation, well, we are waiting for the second part on monday and we are waiting for the results of the work of law enforcement agencies, because neither i nor you, no one has the right, according to the law, except for law enforcement agencies, to conduct an investigation, and only their high-quality work in terms of the formation of evidence will allow us to prosecute the guilty person, if they do not cope with this work, then ... all this investiga

this was an important and saying that gave us these bigu know weo the -- cycle and so i think everybodyhould know about it because it's alsoa[ cool. okay. and so you mentioned some of it earlier, some of the pressing concerns people have. and you pice clinically. and i'm just wondering, what are some of the common questions you get? and i'm also because you're very active on social media, very popular. you're a great source of information there to is there overlap between what you receive the what you see posted on social media versus what you hear in clinic that's? a really great question. so let me let's go to the second one first. so absolutely i think that t office are very similar to the stuff that i see online. i don't think there's much difference to it. and in fact, think, as most of myie online. you know, they actually i think maybe i get asked about some of those things sooner because they think i might have heard about it. so so there'sz- that that the common questions that come up are the idea. is it harmful to not have your and this is often comes up in that context of horm