blackman says he's got a building permit to put it in the ground floor and that's supposed to be the final approval of the application and their signing open o off on 0 permit? i've handed you appellants exhibit no. 10 which is the first application for a digital system. the next is the lower box on the lower left hand coroner. they installed the ostend was at pat. not a single word from mr. blackman why they didn't explore the distributed system on light poles and its not the burden of the city planning it's at&t. in the negligent sixth court of appeals decision the burden is on at&t to discuss all alternatives to the proposed site and explain why it is not feasible. at&t failed to do that. the city must then point out alternatives and give at&t an opportunity to respond and anyone of you may do that by a simple interrogation. and while members of this community are under no legal obligation to tell at&t where they can put their antennas but i'm sure which of us would like to do so >> colleagues any final questions inform the parties. at this point this matter is in the hands of the

>> because we also have a variety of people representing their commission whether it was sue blackman, this evening, representing the library commission. >> and part of what i am asking is whether the complainant and in turn with sunshine task force, as the people who initiate and then refer to the case to us, whether they have the not the responsibility but the authority to frame who the respondent is. and there are differences. it is not just the technicality, there are differences in both the standard and the consequences with which we find it. and so i think that it is, this is not, you know, misspelling of somebody's name, it is a different player and while, the agency can always, and there are some legal issues here, what is a commission? and who speaks for a commission in what way, that i don't have the information before me to what we have assess $what i know is that the library users association which can't act except by some individual or individuals, you know, making it a type of document or file a complaint or alleging that an organization did something. and that organizat

thank you, miss blackman. >> five minutes, for rebuttal. >> people those these things around loosely saying that the library commission has adopted this new policy is untrue. they had a discussion, several years ago where the discussion was that we have a 150 word thing and it is included in your packet a legal memo, it is not a legal memo and does not meet the clarifications or requirements of what is considered a legal opinion, it is simply someone sat down and wrote a little paragraph and all that he did was quote the good government guide. and yet, they tried to represent that as a legal opinion when there is no law included in it at all. now, they come here and try to represent the fact that they had changed their policy, when the only policy that they have ever discussed was can we keep these an addendum and the city library saying that the city attorney says that we can. >> basically the city librarian is violating their own established policy in disregarding it. and if they can do that, what would keep them from simply 6 months from now, saying that we are not going to put th

>> because we also have a variety of people representing their commission whether it was sue blackman, this evening, representing the library commission. >> and part of what i am asking is whether the complainant and in turn with sunshine task force, as the people who initiate and then r

jay blackman is on the phone now, we are told, nbc producer, jay blackman.e can you tell us about the plane? >> caller: craig, the faa is telling us it was coming from seoul, south korea. it landed and crashed upon landing. they are probably in the process of gathering information and sending teams to san francisco. >> what can you tell us? again, i know this is your wheelhouse. what can you tell us about this type of plane, this boeing 777. >> caller: a triple 7 is one of the newer models. it's a large plane, it does long haul like this flight. you know, it's a saturday afternoon, so, there would likely be a lot of passengers. it's unknown at the moment. >> again, this is a very large plane we are talking about here for folks watching at home. any idea, jay, precisely how many passengers it can hold? >> caller: not at this time, craig, no. >> do we know what time this all went down? >> caller: within the last half hour there were some indications of smoke from the cameras that look at the airport. again, right now the information is preliminary. the picture

>> you're profiling him because he's a blackman, he's going for his waistband and he must have a weapon. he was saying that all along to 911. >> sean. >> including fact that he always says that they get away, he used whatever term he used. >> it's a crime-ridden neighborhood. they had five break-ins. >> he did nothing. he was walking home and george zimmerman believed in his mind. >> michael, quick. >> sean, if i can say this, what troubles me about you, sean, is you have two people in this case. one is live and one is dead. he lied to you. he lied to your face, and you're still going to believe him. >> the evidence -- the eyewitness evidence for ground and pound -- >> there is no eyewitness evidence. >> excuse me. there is a witness. his name was john good. he saw him continue to beat him. >> no, he did not. >> yes, he did. >> john good said he could not tell if any touches were being thrown. >> the injuries were consistent with -- >> you guys -- >> i thought you said john good saw it. >> the jurors agreed with me and you can't accept the verdict. >> one juror has spoke snoon and agree

this was not about race, and then on the other hand to come out and say if george zimmerman was a blackman, he wouldn't be charged, is to say we're actually trying to say it is about race and we're trying to flip the script. >> the other thing i found so fascinating is this conservative obsession with zimmerman's race, the fact that he is -- that he is not white. the thing i keep saying is, it is about trayvon martin's race. this case. i mean, when sean bell was shot by new york cops, some of which who happened to be african-american, the people i know, the activists in new york were not like, it's okay because some of the cops were black. it's about this -- >> chris, this is such an important point. i've been hearing in the days since, this language, we're all racist in some ways. i. to be really clear. sure, we are. we're all racist against african-americans. it's not that we're all racists and black folks are racist against whites. there is a constant group for whom there is this sense of criminality, a sense of, you know, being takers, not makers. and that is shared even among often me

let's talk about it with sunny hostin, jeffrey toobin, jose baez, julie blackman is a jury consultantha stewart case. robert horshorn, jury consultant and defense attorney mark geragos who said the trial was over in jury selection. sunny, i want to start with you. when this trial started, you said race had nothing to do with this. you did not see it through a prism of race at all, and yet, after the verdict, you seem to have changed your mind. where are you now? >> yeah, i have changed my mind, because i was seated in the courtroom and i listened to all the evidence come in as a former prosecutor, i didn't see this racial angle. because clearly the government was precluded from arguing race, and they claimed that it was a profiling case. but a criminal profiling case. but i think where i missed that piece was that i think that the jurors, especially when you listen to b-37, sort of had these racial biases, these notions running in the backdrop of their mind. it was clear in that interview, it was an us and them reaction. she didn't find rachel relatable. she did relate to george zimme

particularly those who are talking to their sons as they go out in the world about what it means tore a blackman in america. >> let me ask you about a practical thing, value. you and i talk about it once in a while about everything except this. i want to ask about speed limits. you drive the garden state, 95, you know, you see a black guy stopped. i always wonder, what is this about? i see it all the about. is it a guy speeding? is he two miles over the speed limit -- most of us travel about five miles over the speed limit. we assume there's a grace period. do you think police grabbed african-americans within that grace period that other people seem to be operating by. >> i'll give you a story. when i was a young producer at a local television station in california, i finally earned enough money to get a decent car besides that piece of junk i had. i bought a nice bmw. what i found was during the week when i was dressed like this, not a problem, but on the weekend when i was wearing a t-shirt and ball cap, police cars would do what i called the five-block follow. they seidel up best hind me, fol

when i started, justice brennan, justice marshall, harry blackman were middle 80s. they sat quietly and rarely said anything. she asks one of the first questions. she's sharp with the questions. if the attorney judges something or mistakes it a little bit. she'll correct it and say wasn't it so in this case in the trial court -- whatever. she's really always well prepared and extremely sharp in the questions she asks. >> she was the first -- well, no, chef the second woman on the court for awhile. chef the only one, i guess. now there are three. and adam, you wrote this morning about the three women justices. are they a voting block? >> if this could be a long time to work out mathematically. there are 36 possible combination of pairs of nine justices. and the three pairs were most likely to vote together are the three women on the court. so they are in that sen a block. they are not a block because they are female. they are a block because they are liberal appointee of democratic presidents inspect a term where the right splintered a little bit. you saw the three o

roberta blackman woods. are major contributors have -- >> she space with great authority on the subject. let me explain again. when people donate to the conservative party, they are not mindless leader will stop they are not buying books at the party conference. the reason the gentleman has his job is because trade unions brought votes in the labor parties and put him where he is. that does not happen in other political parties. if you have any sense at all and realize they are profoundly wrong. >> i'm sure the prime minister will agree with me that there is no better way to build a stronger economy and a fair society than through apprenticeships. apprenticeships have doubled over the decade. i am on a mission to build on that success by working with his this is to create new apprenticeships in 100 days. is there opposition? >> i will support the campaign and the campaign of all members to take up apprenticeships. that encourages young people and businesses will stop -- businesses. they are taking on many mo

there was a blackman allegedly killed two people but i don't remember al sharpton was outraged and called it a race crime. it was a horrible tragedy. a young man died who shouldn't have died. that's something we won't be able to bring back. but the parents have done something spectacular. bill: alan dershowitz had pointed comments about the attorneys for the state. he said angela barrishould be disbarred. what happened when tornd said we have to respect the verdict and move on. >> alan dershowitz was unbelievably candid as he tend to be. but he excoriated the prosecutor not on for what he thought was inappropriate behavior on her part withholding important evidence from the defense team. but then her reaction which really kind of goes against the dignity of the court, the dignity of the justice system. once it's over, lawyers whether they won or lost are basically to suck it up and be goo sports and say good game we did our best, that's all we can do. bill: we'll see you soon. we'll see you this weekend as well. martha: waiting a potential bombshell hearing into the irs scandal coming up

. >>> an unarmed young blackman was shot and killed by a police officer, an incident sharing similaritiesdied new year's day 2009 after a shooting at a san francisco area trans station. now it's the basis of a new movie called fruitvale station, a documentary on how he died. a fight on a train and an officer who mistook his gun for a taser. >> get off the train now. >> put that phone down. >> are you still on the train? we're still at fruitvale. >> why can't you tell me what's going on? what is the problem. >> what did he do? >> oh, my gosh. >> joining me now is the direct over fruitvale station ryan kugler. thank you so much for coming in. >> thank you so much for having me. >> we should say this young man's name. oscar grant. he died that night. in a nutshell, can you tell me what happened? >> yeah. oscar grant was a 22-year-old resident in the bay area. he was a father. he had a 4-year-old daughter. had a girlfriend, a family. he and his friends went to san francisco on a b.a.r.t. train to see new year's eve fireworks and on the way back there was an altercation on the train and he and

we commented on "the washington post" richard cohen describing how a blackman wearing a hoody is a uniformm flummoxed by that. on the right, congressman are actually telling concerned african-american parents to, quote, get over it. i don't know how many of you read editorials in "the wall street journal" that quoted martin luther king suggesting black people are morally inferior. you talk about taking words and taking them from their proper context and using martin luther king's words 50 years later to justify the killing of a young black man. walking unarmed through a suburban neighborhood. it's perverse. and elsewhere, for a variety of reasons, that trayvon had it coming. it seems we keep hearing, mika, that trayvon had it coming because he had pot in his system. i keep hearing this from people like sean hannity and others on the right. really? is that the new standard? would we like to go across college campuses in america and tell all white boys that if they tell marijuana in their system, then they're fair game? if they're walking through the neighborhood and they act in an untoward

. >> president obama making the case that what happened to trayvon martin could happen to any blackmans but the naacp says this case is not over. they're calling on the justice department to investigate. david webb has been following this case from the beginning. david, thanks for coming back. president's remarks kind of framed the story from the beginning. if you took that out, zimmerman is hispanic or whatever and trayvon martin, you see a tragic case for sure? >> yes. >> i don't necessarily see a racial case, do you? >> this isn't a racial case. it was made a racial case. you know, not even limited to the president. what that is, that's the nation's largest microphone. it's the president of the united states. al sharpton, jesse jackson, all of those, the actions of benjamin crump they all blame roslyn brock. there's now 100,000 signatures on the doj petition. the petition's great for raising the roof, if you will, on what they want, but in reality where is the justice department and their actions on this? they have a problem now with a conflict. what their unit has done, the crs uni