bannon, you'll remember, was head of breitbart.se issued the exception we're talking about, bannon was subject to an ethics pledge that he couldn't talk to people at breitbart about anything that overlapped with his official white house duties. but a watchdog group accused him of doing just that. and this waiver could get him off the hook. why? well, the white house made it retroactive, back to day one of the trump administration. that means bannon could have violated the original ethics pledge, and this waiver covered those prior conversations. now, this is key. ethics hawks are worried about bannon using breitbart as a tool to advance his own interest and perhaps hurt his political foes. i was told there's no such thing as a retroactive waiver. the white house said it hasn't violated any ethics rules by issuing this kind of a waiver, and it says, quote, those who received waivers are in compliance with their ethical obligations. and ana, at the end of the day, the white house holds the cards here. back to you. >> thanks, christin

. >> juan: you get from breitbart.hen bannon -- you can't handle it. >> greg: you are talking crap. >> juan: you get it from breitbart. >> greg: i don't even read that stuff! >> juan: if you are a good libertarian -- >> kimberly: juan, don't you find that to be a little bit arrogant? >> greg: i gave you the economics and the a block. >> kimberly: put the timer on them. it could go on and on. >> juan: it would be a damage to the coastal -- >> greg: that's based on media hysteria. >> juan: the american people -- >> greg: you are twisting it and taking a poll based on people people's attitudes. >> juan: the whole argument about nationalism, this is gonna help workers -- >> greg: i didn't say that. i didn't say that. >> kimberly: greg is actually very learned. an expert on climate change. >> jesse: he went to berkeley! >> greg: i read this stuff, juan. i read it. >> kimberly: bottom line is, i take it issue with the. you are disparaging greg. it's totally unfounded. >> juan: i'm telling you -- >> kimberly: he doesn't read

that's where you get your crap. >> breitbart. >> i don't even read that stuff. >> you all lie.u're a good done tusk and libertarian in your place you can't oppose this. >> don't you find that to be a little arrogant. >> you don't even know the numbers. >> i'll give you some numbers. >> i gave you the economics and you just ignored the. >> three-quarters of the american people - - . >> put the timer. >> that's a poll. >> three-quarters of the american people say that they expect as a result of climate change be damage to the coastala waters. >> that's a poll based on media hysteria, that is not a fact. the interpretation. >> the american people are crazy. >> you're twisting it. you're taking a poll that is based on peoples attitudes fromg media coverage and turning that into a fact. that's not a fact, juan. >> going to help workers. >> i didn't say that. >> it comes from you on the breitbart and right wing talk radio. >> you are impunng. >> greg is very learned on climate change. >> he went to berkley, oh, okay. >> i actually read this stuff. >> it was an honorary degree. >> i r

it's not even happening on breitbart anymore.happening on facebook, it's happening on twitter, it's happening in ways that people produce their own content and on social media and within families , among colleagues and people are isolating each other and destroying relationships over politics and i'm sure almost everyone in this room can relate some experience or another whether it's thanksgiving dinner or a facebook friend that dropped out or something like that. this is happening over and over again and the experience of polarization was one that we are not just seeing when people show up to vote. i think that perhaps for me the most surprising number that 45% of trump voters don't know anybody who voted for clinton. we tend to think in the conservative movement that democrats are more sheltered from the opposite side because we are bombarded by media source that is don't agree with our perspective. in terms of personal relationships, that tells me that the problem is bipartisan and that people are totally cut off from any kind

i think this is not just going to be limited to breitbart news.g to continue to grow and there are other people who are now on tv and who are -- trump basically spokespeople. going back to what you're saying, why do people believe some of this stuff, why do they defend trump? the reason why, trump and the media have done a good job of delegitimizing it. and spicer saying, no, he actually speaks arabic. they're going with what breitbart says and trump says. >> as a media consultant, what do you think the chances of this propaganda and dear leaderism around the country? >> i think to build up on what they've built in places like breitbart to a local level. this is from day one attacked the media, they've done the enemy. they've done the you cannot believe what they say. they draw this to the local level, the grassroots level. that's where the support is deepest. that's where they reinforced the message that they need to look elsewhere for information. remember, during the campaign, there was all of this talk watching tv should trump lose with bannon

was subject to the ethics pledge barring him from communicating with breitbart and this waiver could the hook because the white house made the waiver retroactive back to day one of the trump administration. that mans bannon could have violated the original pledge and this waiver covers prior conversations. now, the head of the office of government ethics flatly told mow said there's no such thing as a retroactive waiver. if you engage in prohibited conduct without the waiver you've violated the rule and issuing a waiver after the fact won't change that. look, the focus on bannon, as you pointed out, is key here because ethics experts are worried he's using breitbart as a tool to advance his own interests and to perhaps hurt his political foes. jake? >> interesting, because a lot of political foes are his colleagues at the white house, rivals for the president's influence like reince priebus and jared kushner. tell me more about this retroactive waiver thing. if there's no such thing as a retroactive waiver, who at the white house is account schnabl. >> no one. the white house can't p

trump may find himself running an administration with no one but his family and the breitbart staff. people with talent and integrity won't work for a boss who undermines them in public without thinking about the consequences. the president undercut the people that said this wasn't a ban. he undercut the people that provided the rationale for firing james comey and he wants loyalty for people who worked for him. he has said over and over again loyalty is premier, but don't they deserve the same? i think about h.r. mcmaster and gary cohn writing that op-ed in "the wall street journal" last week about how the president supported article 5 and then we learned that, in fact, he took article 5 at the last minute out of his speech to nato. >> well, i think there's two things here at play. look, i've worked for bosses i had to be loyal to that i did not agree with the way that they ran business. it's something every individual has to make a choice, do you want to support the man in charge or not. in this case, it's all voluntary so people can walk away at any time. no doubt, mr. trump has g

we know that steve bannon has a waiver that he can communicate with breitbart news. he has a line in. rod rosenstein's letter he put out last night was rather strange. now the president, who has been complimentary of him in the past, puts out this confusing tweet. >> we're told by people close to rod rosenstein that this was entirely his decision. he was not prompted to do it by anyone else. the white house didn't tell him to do it. he's on his own. he's been frustrated ever since he came into office about what he thinks are incorrect stories, stories he had threatened to resign after the initial disclosure of the firing of comey and his role in it, that he thinks was incorrect. another story said that he had been approached by comey and asked for more resources for the russia investigation and turned him down. rosenstein said both of those were incorrect. comey himself has said that the second one was not correct. so this official says he's been sort of -- his frustration has been building. more stories this week. of course, it's also correct that rod rosenstein doe

white house seems to get a little more strained each day we'll get very different perspectives from breitbart senior editor at large joel pollak and from the former white house special counsel to bill clinton lanny davis let's begin with lanny who joins me from washington d.c. and addition to serving a special counsel to president clinton he is also a strategic media and crisis management expert and co-founder and partner of trident d.m.g. welcome lanny thank you are nice to be back well it's good to have a say have you back with us here on politicking lanny this last week there was an especially divisive press conference at the white house where deputy white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders in the briefing room ripped on c.n.n. for again this new term that's becoming familiar fake news and then a local maryland editor later accused her of being inflammatory there seems to be quite a dichotomy going on between the white house press office of the trump administration and the media mainstream and otherwise what do you make of it. well first of all i'm completely shocked shocked shoc

>> guest: one of the first people to capitalize on this was -- breitbart -- i think -- it links to new photos a man my dad's home address and stuff like that. it's personal and nonpersonal at all at the same time but the gaming side was the fact that so many people from all different walks of life are making games in there like know this is mine you can't be here elements of a and then the elements of people who like yelling at anybody they perceive to be remotely feminist there so many nightmare trash that wind up purposefully and i was at the wrong place. >> so when you first found this log post online where were you? how did you find it? >> you found me. was out with friends with my new boyfriend and we are about he was going to accept a job in france we're celebrating my birthday my phone started buzzing and buzzing it's kind of like counting the thunderbolts the time between buses got shorter and shorter in my phone going off with all these really sexually charged threats i had to work backwards from math. all i knew is a friend of mine has said i don't know if you noticed but som

yes, that steve banon, president trump's chief strategist. >> breitbart, connected to fox news.ing radio, creates narrative. they have a series of stories. basically saying, deep state leaks for the first time. this, that, the other. of this will then be linked to other web sites. daily caller. it will be amped up on info wars. generated on tv. fox news. all of this, network of propaganda sites is directly then tied to some one sitting inside the white house. >> you think trump is going to be impeached? >> you no, i don't think, i don't know how we can maintain hostility for 4 1/2 months for 44 more months. i don't know how it will end. my guess is badly. >> do you think there will be violence? i raised the issue of possible violence in the context of -- an impeachment. would it come to violence. i don't know. i wouldn't predict that. but i do think that this country would be even further and irrevocably divided over the issue and not forget it for a long, long time. they would believe what, ted? they would believe that this establishment was out to get trump from the first day.

you had a breitbart staffer fired for a tweet.ave had some journalists recently fired for tweets. i think we cannot underestimate what twitter is doing to politics right now. it really is the modern day statement. and you cannot dismiss it as social media. it is the way you communicate today. >> since you brought up kellyanne conway's husband had, who was up for a justice department position, withdrew his nomination, he tweeted out this. they may make people feel better, but it won't help the office get five votes in the supreme court. sad. from a legal view here, could trump's tweets impact this executive order? this travel ban? >> it's a good question. i can only imagine the level of exasperation among the president's lawyers at the justice department. which he directs and where they serve. he is making an increasingly already difficult case increasingly difficult to defend. lawyers sometimes have defiant unruly clients who are their own worst enemies, but it has to be special to have their worst enemy the president of the unite

the bottom line is breitbart said, no, they drew a line.ight, if you will, that says, okay, we have lines, we have boundaries and cnn which take a day or so to decide on kathy griffin, even with the decapitated head of the president. why is it so difficult for them to say, hey, guys, you've gone too far. doesn't that actually encourage them to do these things. >>? as a communications professional and campaign, one thing we work on a lot, charles, is creating what we call the narrative. what is the narrative of the campaign and central message and story lines that bring you there? more and more we're seeing an example you just cited especially with cnn. certain things don't fit their narrative, the story that's noted didn't fit the narrative that they have a president they want to report being some degree in freefall and the country in some degree of peril. and you talk about lines. if i may. not so long ago, we had a president who said i'm going to draw the line in the sand and then we had terrorism, you know, eye to eye in syria. well, tha

some of the polling shows -- breitbart and right wing media sites are all echoing the trump line right now. there has been some drop in -- drop in strong support for the president. one of the things you saw i think up in the senate at that intelligence committee hearing republican senators, a lot did try to put the best face on trump's actions. i think there's no question about that but you also saw them almost to a person vouch for james comey's credibility. >> sure. >> so i think one of the big questions you're going to see, does the president's story hold up under oath, if, indeed, he does as promise testify about this. >> so important to watch what happens with the trump base. george stephanopoulos, thank you very much. a reminder george as a big show and as he said he's going to go one-on-one with preet bharara for his first interview since being fired by president trump plus george will speak with jay sekulow coming up later on "this week" on abc. we will move on now to a deadly attack on american soldiers overseas. u.s. officials say an afghan army soldier who is being trained b

ethics complaint since the white house counsel's office over repeated contacts he had with breitbartviolation of his ethics pledge not to do so. there was no date on the waiver released by the white house last night, which suggests it was issued retroactively, and that's a problem as schaub told "the new york times." there is no such thing as a retroactive waiver. if you need a retro active waiver, you have violated a rule. to get a sense of how preposterous this is, imagine if president obama had issued a retroactive waiver to hillary clinton last year over her e-mail practices. you might as well just call this what it is. a pardon. something i suspect this president is going to be issuing a lot more of. when we come back, investigative reporter michael isikoff with incredible new reporting on the trump administration's secret efforts to lift russian sanctions in the first week of the presidency. that's next. hey team, i know we're tight on time, but i really need a... ...sick day tomorrow. moms don't take sick days. moms take nyquil severe: the... ...nighttime sniffling,sneezing, c

. >> recently, breitbart news challenged the accuracy of the cnn story and afterwards it was retracted, deleted, and the editors responsible were fired as well as the network apologized for the story. the target of the -- one of the targets of the story accepted the apology, the president went on twitter this morning and repeated that cnn was fake news. why isn't their response good enough for the president? >> i don't know that it's that their response isn't good enough for the president. i think it's the constant barrage of fake news directed at this president, probably, that has garnered a lot of his frustration. you point to that report. there are multiple other instances where that outlet that you referenced has been repeatedly wrong and had to point that out or be corrected. there's a video circulating now, whether it's accurate or not, i don't know, but i would encourage everybody in this room and frankly everybody across the country to take a look at it. i think if it is accurate, i think it's a disgrace to all of media, to all of journalism. i think that we have gone to a plac

bannon formerly headed breitbart, which frequently publishes racist, sexist, xenophobic news. the director of the office of government ethics, walter shaub, told "the new york times," the move was invalid, saying -- "there is no such thing as a retroactive waiver. if you need a retroactive waiver, you have violated a rule." in russia, president vladimir putin denied allegations thursday that the russian government meddled in the 2016 u.s. election. but putin suggested for the first time that independent russian hackers may have played a role in undermining the campaign of hillary clinton. >> hackers are free-spirited people. they are like artists. if they are in a good made in the morning, they wake up and paint. it is the same for hackers. they wake upoday, they read something is happening in interstate relations, and if there patriotically minded, they start to make up their own contribution to what they believe is the good fight against those who speak badly about russia. amy: putin's comments came as two democratic senators said they asked former fbi director james comey t

bill king, more disturbing, breitbart is one of the sources president trump uses as actual real news. carol writes it's despicable. i watched the u.s. open yesterday. we're asking you this morning. should nbc bothered talking to a man like him. your thoughts. did you watch the interview? was there anything to learn from that interview? karen is in wisconsin line for independents. good morning. caller: good morning. i feel very strongly about this. it might seem little silly. i didn't want the interview. i'm a 60 minutes girl. i have had exposure to alex youtube. he's all over there and it's pure nonsense. the reason that people should all be saying absolutely, should be aired. if this is america for heaven sakes. our president looks to this guy as a credible source of information. that should be of concern to everyone. most by the mainstream individual don't have any idea who this man is. of course we should know who he is. if nothing else, show that we can change the channel and choose to watch 60 minutes. megyn, we have too few opportunities for common, credible media these days tha

campaign was organized by a right-wing group funded by donors close to both president trump and to breitbart news, the city's police chief and several corporate sponsors said they would boycott the event. oscar lopez rivera says s he wil still march, but not as an official hononoree, but a humble puerto ricanan and a grandfathe. all thatat and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. former fbi director james comey will tell a senate panel today that president trump repeatedly demanded his loyalty and pressured comey to end a probe into former national security adviser michael flynn. comey, who was fired by president trump last month amid a growing fbi investigation into russia's role in the 2016 u.s. election, released his planned opening remarks to lawmakers on wednesday, ahead of today's highly anticipated appearance before the senate intelligence committee. in his statement, comey reveals he was summoned to the white house for a one-on-one dinner with the president on january 27, where trump asked whether comey wished to kee

. >> i was going to say like the steve bannon one is so he can communicate with breitbart.e an official propaganda wing of the government like operating out of the white house. i mean, this is scary stuff. we can laugh about it and we can be incredulous about it. but there is an official government organ operating out of the white house. and it has a white house press pass too. that's just so strange and unsettling. i mean i'm glad we're talking about this. >> i was going to say, one thing -- one thing that is extremely frustrating about this is that we can't do anything. like there is no recourse. we can wag our fingers. well can say this is bad, this looks really bad. but, like, the people that it looks bad to don't matter to the trump administration. >> right. and just to be clear for those who are not clear on it, not only do we have reince priebus and kellyanne conway who both had former contact with the rnc and as ana marie mentioned, of course steve bannon and breitbart, you've got don mcgahn, who is the white house cons, used to work for jones day he can now talk to

part of this could have been written by somebody who wrote for breitbart, it seemed like, in the way that they are framing comey and the way that they are framing him as someone who is leaking and this, of course, has been a real focus of the white house and a real focus of republicans as well. listen, this is not going to end at all. we'll see what donald trump does for the next days, if he's able to maintain what we saw, a presentation from his lawyer kasowitz. they have definitely cordoned off -- sean spicer had to answer questions about this and sarah huckabee sanders and not doing so well and now they have kasowitz. >> they wouldn't answer questions. >> right. it was in some ways late. right? comey finished at like 12:30, 1:00. this came out and we got a couple of warnings that he was going to come out. he came out very late and this thing had a lot of typos in it. >> it was delivered by the president's personal attorney, not the white house counsel. >> if you were going to sum up today, it would be liar, liar from comey, leaking liar from trump to comey. i mean, these are -- th

she told breitbart that's the biggest issue. >> well, it doesn't make sense "doesn't live there." pretty pathetic. but in the end i don't think it will make that much difference. the thing with oshof, he fits the district. progress i was have to take someone like that to win those kind of seats. will it be a bellwether? only in that those are the kind of seats democrats have to win in order to get the majority in 2018. if he wins, they can show, yes, we can pick off these kind of republican seats. this is not a trump district. it's a republican district -- >> but they weren't enthusiastic for trump in this district. >> trump won it by two percentage points. and tom price won it by 22, or 24 points. so you have a lot of people who are in the district who are like -- who were the progress i was, excited to work for oshoff, but then you have people like -- it may be a referendum on trump. >> say the democrats lose by just a point. it's very close. oshoff loses. does that stop them cold? >> you know, close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. the democrats have to win one of t

news who has a waiver to still speak to breitbart, let's be clear when we talk about leaks, they're everywhere. i want to bring in my panel. mike lupica is an msnbc contributor and columnist for the "new york daily news" and megan murphy not just the editor for "bloomberg business week" this week, yesterday it hit stands "bloomberg business week" relaunched, is it a new direction, new brand, looks fantastic. so fantastic that megan rocked up with celebration hair today. this is a party. michael, i want to start with you, your reaction to vp mike pence lawyering up? i learned something a moment ago i want to point out in terms of the swamp his lawyer happens to be james comey's daughter's godfather, hello swamp. what's your take? >> it's a prudent thing for the vice president to get a lawyer because he doesn't know where robert mueller is going with the investigation because nobody does. less than five months into your administration, if there's a headline in the times or "wall street journal" or "washington post" saying your vice president has lawyered up it's not like things are go

bannon had been running the breitbart operation supplying a lot of the untrue, false stories. >> reporter: clinton also said donald trump and bernie sanders could get angry about issues but voters didn't accept that from a woman but above all she blames her loss on james comey, for reviving the investigation just before election and telling voters he had been investigating russia for months. savannah? >> andrea mitchell in washington, thank you. >>> president trump meanwhile is keeping the world in suspension tonight about his plans tonight regarding the paris accord. reports today the president was about to drop the hammer on that agreement sent a ripple across the globe but tonight some activists are holding out hope. nbc white house correspondent kristen welker with the enormous impact it could have. >> reporter: tonight, mounting anticipation as president trump inches closer to a final decision on the paris climate agreement. two administration officials tell nbc news mr. trump is leaning toward pulling out of the obama era accord. >> very soon. you'll find out very soon. >> reporter:

bannon who had been running the breitbart operation, supplying a lot of the untrue, false stories. >> clinton also said donald trump and brns could get angry about issues but voters didn't accept that from a woman. trump tweeting crooked hillary clinton blames everybody but herself refuses to say she was a terrible candidate, hits facebook even dems and dnc. to which clinton quoposted, quo, people in covfefe houses shouldn't throw covfefe. hitting trump for that strange tweet that had many scratching their heads. >>> florida police released new video showing tiger woods before he was arrested monday. after the star golfer was found asleep at the wheel an officer asked him a series of questions. >> do you know where you're going? >> no. >> have you had anything to drink tonight? >> i have not. >> are you sure? 100%. >> have you taken illegal drugs? >> no. >> okay. have you taken medication? >> yes. >> the officer then conducted a field sobriety test on woods. >> w, x, y and z. >> sir, what i want you to do is place your hands behind your back. okay. >> law enforcement released pictures

one retroactive waiver allows chief strategist steve bannon to communicate with editors at breitbart, the conservative news site he used to run. other waivers perpetuate the so-called revolving door between the public and private sector, allowing staffers who are recently paid by companies and organizations to now advance their same agendas in the white house, like counselor kellyanne conway, whose consulting business had dozens of clients, or michael catanzaro, a former lobbyist for oil and gas companies who now advises the president on energy matters. >> government officials and employees ought to be doing their job in a disinterested way. >> reporter: robert walker is an attorney who advises clients on government ethics rules. >> that includes not having matter comes before them where their former clients, recently former clients had an interest, the notion being their decisions might be biased or affected by their association with their former claets. >> reporter: the white house says it issued the waivers to bring in expertise on certain matters, a rationale also used by the obam

white house seems to get a little more strained each day we'll get very different perspectives from breitbart senior editor at large joel pollak and from the former white house special counsel to bill clinton lanny davis let's begin with lanny who joins me from washington d.c. and addition to serving a special counsel to president clinton he is also a strategic media and crisis management expert and co-founder and partner of trident d.m.g. welcome lanny thank you are nice to be back well it's good to have a say have you back with us here on politicking lanny this last week there was an especially divisive press conference at the white house where deputy white house press secretary sarah huckabee sanders in the briefing room ripped on c.n.n. for again this new term that's becoming familiar fake news and then a local maryland editor later accused her of being inflammatory there seems to be quite a dichotomy going on between the white house press office of the trump and ministration and the media mainstream and otherwise what do you make of it. well first of all i'm completely shocked shocked sh

and also a lot of stuff you hear on breitbart, you see alex jones and sean handsy. everything's coming out of fox news. they put out what they want to put out. host: we're going to end it there and go live to the floor of the house of representatives. almighty god, on a day when violence has come to this assembly, we ask your blessing on our brother, representative steve scalise, the two officers and the staffer who have been shot. bless the hands of those who tend to their injuries. we as americans are blessed by a free and open society with rights secured by law and the constitution. but once again we're reminded that there is a vulnerability that comes with that openness. may we all

but that's the thing, mother jones which is a far left, wrote that i'm further left than breitbart.y want to strike the fear and everyone to the point that everyone will just be quiet and people have to learn that it shouldn't work. >> i think the whole trump phenomenon is showing that it's wearing off. i hear music coming. we have to remind ourselves, messaging works. the people committing a lot of isis atrocities have never met isis. that means you can influence people. this guy was influenced, but then that would be wrong or is it. i'm just rambling. we discussed the latest on the investigation with russia, coming up next. ♪ track your pack. set a curfew, or two. make dinner-time device free. [ music stops ] [ music plays again ] a smarter way to wifi is awesome. introducing xfinity xfi. amazing speed, coverage and control. change the way you wifi. xfinity. the future of awesome. is being blunt about a witch hunt. special counsel robert muller, president trump called it a witch hunt like three times but is it? it sounds like a fox hunt. they are surrounding a wounded animal and t

everything is going full partners as you can see this with maddow and olbermann on the left and breitbart man of the in the gang on the right. i think for most of us who you know tragically followed news media as a good part of our lives we've seen this building you know since the sincere imus of the c. of fox but barely i think if we're see that this pitch can we really attribute all of this just to donald trump the loss of clinton and you know russia. you know i think this trump and this are both symptoms of the same thing which is that you know we have the sermon towards polarization in this country you know in the old days somebody like donald trump could never been elected because. candidate one. he's had to conquer the center and that's what both political parties from looking for they were looking for somebody who had quote unquote crossover appeal. but now it doesn't work anymore and that this mirror of the old media strategy you know some new york race is going to have the. standard traditional media method of hearing one republican quote with one democratic vote and adding this

but mchugh says breitbart fired me for telling the truth.s joe scarborough. >> i think he's such a narcissist, it's pose's mentally ill in a way, now this is on the table, he's not well. howie: and on-air rebuttal from the fox prime time host. >> joe scarborough calling the president of the united states a schmuck. it's emotionally unhinged coverage has been none other than msnbc's liberal joe. howie: he tweeted back, you are obsessed. and hannity tweeted scar were poe was an obama suck-up and disgrace. but they won't have one thing in common. they love a good brawl. that's it for this edition of "mediabuzz." go to our home page and download our podcast. great to see you. we are back here next sunday. we'll see you then with the more stuff on trump and the media

white house seems to get a little more strained each day we'll get very different perspectives from breitbart senior editor at large and old.

but that's the thing, mother jones which is a far left, wrote that i'm further left than breitbart.y want to strike the fear and everyone to the point that everyone will just be quiet and people have to learn that it shouldn't work. >> i think the whole trump phenomenon is showing that it's wearing off. i hear music coming. we have to remind ourselves, messaging works. the people committing a lot of isis atrocities have never met isis. that means you can influence people. this guy was influenced, but then that would be wrong or is it. i'm just rambling. we discussed the latest on the investigation with russia, coming up next. save big on great father's day gifts at bass pro shops. like this igloo 48 quart cooler for under $20. new balance 608 trainers for under $50. plus, free catch and release ponds and giveaways this weekend. hi..and i know that we have phonaccident forgiveness.gent, so the incredibly minor accident that i had tonight- four weeks without the car. okay, yup. good night. with accident forgiveness your rates won't go up just because of an accident. switching to allst