it seems to me that this political conclusion is the main thing for us, thank you , but as for brics,it is brazil, russia , india, china and south the african republic is supposedly the summit itself was held under the chairmanship of the people's republic of china, but analysts write that the result of this itself is the reorientation of this club to beijing and then which tried to present its appearance at this the virtual summit as an achievement of russian diplomacy, in fact, it is a symbol of even greater marginalization, i am now quoting analysts, so in year 2, it is a victory for putin or, well, let’s say on the contrary, a demonstration of his isolation from this world, and this is simply an attempt to fit into at least some, well, more or less decent let's go to the company. i 'll say it so diplomatically. this is the organization where they still let him in. that's what i'll finish in the comments. happens in international organizations when a representative of the russian federation speaks or tries to take the floor. well, i already said that somewhere here on the air, don'

thus, we are dealing with states that belong to such and such an association called brics. ukraine must approach this work in a very systematic way. this work must be built on the basis of e-e and arguments and e-search for contacts and search opportunities er very often this work should not be replaced purely by pr and it should be er so high-quality that it could compete with er many years of russian connection with the political and establishment states of asia, africa, south america and yes, not even russian, and even soviet, if we are talking about india. yes, for sure. and brazil, too. by the way , last week, exactly, when the g20 foreign ministers themselves met, putin met with the leaders of the faction state duma where he tried to articulate his position, tell about what he wants and in general what he thinks about the current situation not only in ukraine but also in the world. he said that the collective action is totalitarian and accused the west of totalitarianism. let's listen to whether putin said the west which once he declared such principles of democracy a

we are with russia. with russia, and to work with brics to try and find solutions to these problem we'reas not fashionable to do so, and we make no apology about our association with russia. a crisis point is facing south africa — do you believe that the monopoly on power of the anc is about to come to an end? and if it is, are you prepared to work with the biggest opposition party, the democratic alliance, to bring the anc�*s rule to an end? well, the eff will bring the anc�*s rule to an end. and our strategy, as we are about to collapse this big elephant, is not to consider who else to work with. we want to take down the anc, and we are doing exactly that. but you've got a decision to make, because you only get 10% of the vote in elections — the democratic alliance get twice that. so you've got to either build a coalition with other opposition elements, or you are never going to get anywhere near power. i didn't know, on the other side, you are a fortune teller. i thought you were a journalist. because you can't tell what's going to happen in 202a. only us who are involved in this work

place in brazil thus we have dealing with states that belong to such and such an association called bricsraine should approach this work very systematically often this work does not have to be replaced by purely pr and it should be so high-quality that it could compete with the very long-standing russian connection with the political and attitudes of the countries of asia, africa, south america well, even so even not russian, and even soviet, if we are talking about india. yes, and brazil, too. by the way , last week, just when the ministers of foreign affairs of the g20 were meeting, putin met with the leaders of the state duma faction, where he tried to articulate his position, tell about what he wants and in general he said that the collective action is totalitarian and accused the west of totalitarianism, let's listen to what putin said, the west, which once declared the principles of democracy as a bastard the word pluralism, respect and new opinions are now being invaded in the complete opposite of a totalitarian, including censorship, closing down media, arbitrariness towards journ

and the fact that the tis and the brics were happening in parallel, almost together, where there wereividual persons here and there, well, in particular, such as the prime minister the minister of india testifies to the fact that in the group of these countries that cannot cut the umbilical cord with russia but dream of being democratic states and working with the civilized world. there is also a process of fatigue from the war in our country and any message that is thrown out very often deliberately by putin about the fact that he is preparing to offer something and so on, you know it like a shooting gallery when people are shown a chance for salvation, conditionally speaking, which is unknown what usually ends it ends badly, but this is an old gebish practice, i accept this argument, but i emphasize that washington and the reference point of the entire civilized world occupy the leading positions in the politics of relations and evaluations of the kremlin now going to washington, the decisions made by nato make these leadership positions irreversible because the decision made by the

and the fact that tis and the brics were happening in parallel, almost together, where there were individualersons here and there, well, such as the prime minister of india in particular, shows that in the group of these countries which they cannot cut the umbilical cord with russia, but they dream of being democratic states and working with the civilized world. today, we are searching for our place, our position, if not at our expense, mr. romanov, we understand that the process is happening, and we are also tired of war and any a message that is thrown in very often deliberately by putin about the fact that he is preparing to offer something and so on, you know it is like a shooting gallery when people are shown a chance for salvation that is not known how it ends usually it ends badly but it is an old practice i accept this argument but i emphasize that the leadership positions now in the politics of relations and assessments of the kremlin are occupied by washington, and the reference point of the entire civilized world goes to washington, the decisions made by nato make these leadership

the poorest countries in the world it cannot afford to act in this way and what is parallel tis and bricsook place almost at the same time, where there were individual persons here and there, well, such as the prime minister of india in particular, shows that in the group of these countries that cannot cut the umbilical cord with russia but dream of being democratic states and working with a civilized the world today is searching for its place, its position, if not at our expense, mr. novels, we understand that there is also a process of war fatigue in our country, and any message that is thrown out very often deliberately by putin about the fact that here he is preparing to offer something and so you know it like a shooting gallery when people are shown a conditional chance for salvation, which is unknown. how it ends. usually it ends badly, but it is an old practice. i accept this argument, but i emphasize that the leadership positions now in the politics of attitudes and evaluations are occupied by the kremlin washington and the reference point of the entire civilized world goes to was

would be more appropriate to work on it with russian partners on such organizations as the cis, the bricsand what he declares, at the same time he adds that neutral countries in ukraine, in particular syria, iran and bolivia, should also join the tribunal all russian potential allies were voiced, important information from british intelligence, therefore, according to its version, russia has now received a dilemma that they cannot solve for us. therefore , fruitless battles continue in the donbas and kherson directions, russian commanders continue to face the dilemma of whether to intensify the offensive in the east or strengthen the defense in the west british intelligence notes the occupiers' problems with military equipment. volodymyr omelyan is in touch with us - minister of infrastructure of ukraine from 2016 to 19 year diplomats politicians e-e p volodymyr congratulations glory to ukraine greetings studio of heroes let's talk a little about the situation in the south with your permission yes at least because there we see that the armed forces of ukraine continue to demonstrate selec

and i'm not sure this form of open economy, it's the most globally integrated economy among the bricscountries. 700 1000 russians have left russia after the war. this maintains private channels and new ways of influencing what's going on there i think it's new. we have a systemic rivalry. it's not the kind of economic, different model that russia proposes as the soviet union was. but we have a different model of governance of policy of justification. uh, a, and hence we have this kind of competition. it will be a different cold war, but it will be a cold thank you very much. this was to the point for this edition. thank you very much for watching. and if you're watching us on youtube do share with us what you think down there in the comments, thank you very

audience, with these theses, lavrov is trying to work with the so-called global south and with the bricsountries to at least preserve his ecological niche there and to at least promote these theses there, you say sell these bikes to the global south, in your opinion, the global south is ready to buy these bikes, and we have to admit that in principle, let's agree, we don't have many experts who know that region, and it's quite possible to assume symmetry, there are also few experts who know our region, and accordingly, if we do not strengthen the work and diplomatic expertise in these areas , then there are chances for this, of course we have cheesy allies, the european union has repeatedly emphasized that this is wrong for ukraine, those problems with the supply of me you which arose, the european union supports us in every way, there is the united states, which also supports us, but we must also take into account that in the post-colonial world, in some places , the countries of e-e europe and the united states are not treated very well states of america and here and its russian laurel

that, unfortunately, there is no such clear position in china, nor in india, well, in general, in the bricsthe position is different from the group of seven, and here it is necessary to carry out a lot of work, it is clear that it is in their interests hmmm, they are using the situation for their own, but still, we need to work wherever we can with the public, uh, in india, at least for sure, and in brazil, the same, and in south africa, well, in china, obviously, we need to work with the government rather and still prove our arguments as much as possible, but china, so today there was a meeting of the secretary general of the united states, anthony blinken, with the minister of legislation in china, they and this meeting showed that there are serious differences of opinion and fundamental issues between the countries, in particular, on the war in ukraine, because china is always talking about about the fact that if ukraine had not become a participant in this history of joining nato, if the west had not wanted ukraine to join nato, then there would have been no war, and we understand this

the western world, we are not the markets of western countries, well, actually, for this, and when bricsfederation . i think that this is one of the key issues now. by the way, this is one of the key issues, including for the western world, because to what extent it will be the only one in this process, that is, previously, secondary sanctions can stop potential partners of russia today. here it's not only about sanctions, but i would also say to the negotiation process, because the sanctions are additional to the country, for example, non-western countries, it's the opposite . in the 70s, work with china, when china was knocked out of the zone of soviet influence due to interaction, that is why it is necessary to do this with certain western countries. by the way, i think that ukraine also needs to pay attention to

true, he said that apparently some local drug addicts, because they took away only bric-a-brac. the house there are more valuable things. that's how we got his warrant from me. there is just a mountain of correspondence, but for the company for honey, nothing so far. this is my niece name nino cheerful sings dances very well cooks obedient. i'm sorry, but i'm not going to get married yet. leave it like that found the letter. open the stamp on the week-old envelope, got it? it's just a couple of lines, honey. gosh, i ca n't forget you. i don't know your email address, but i remember the name of the company where you work. or maybe you can read it yourself? have sent. i hope you read this letter know, dear. gosh that i'm not for a second, but i don't forget you, no matter where you are, i'm with you, i still love you, even though you treated me cruelly. i really look forward to you coming back to me forever your zhanna the return address struck me. do you think it's a coincidence that it lives? in the same area, no, there is a direct connection. it's him, katya , sorry for the nam

when we talk about brics, when we talk about this summit, we keep reminding ourselves that the worldided into two worlds, the world of democracy and the world of authoritarianism, and soon it will not be opportunities to be between these two worlds, to try to be between them, there are states that are trying to be between them , that is, states that actually have authoritarian tendencies but with a democratic system that provides for free elections . it is difficult to balance everything now, is armenia a country that is actually in such a foreign policy center of influence of russia. but at the same time, this country has democratic elections. and somehow, well, it turns out that all this is not connected, which is very difficult, because the same army armenia has good relations with moscow to tehran, and with it the system itself, which contradicts the ideas of moscow and the tiger about how the state should be organized. and now what is happening is the victory between armenia and turkey and the normalization of each other. this already says about the fact that even in yerevan the

of this and when brics was created, including by the russian federation and will it work or will it work for a long time, i think that this is one of the key questions now, by the way, when is one of the key questions, including for the western world, because to what extent it will be the only one in this process, previously, secondary sanctions can stop potential partners of russia today, and look, it’s not just about sanctions, but i would also say the negotiation process, because the sanctions are additional to a country, for example, not a western one, on the contrary, it can have moment that they will still be more ready to huddle together, yes, that is. it seems to me that it is necessary to take a strategy from the west. and once in the 70s they chose to work with china, when china was knocked out of the zone of soviet influence due to interaction, that is why it is necessary to do this with certain non-western countries. by the way, i think that ukraine too also, we need to look closely at these countries, because a lot depends on them, and plus we have to work with global proble

question is really about brazil, the russian federation and the question of activation along the lines of bricsho do we have there today turkey said that they are the enemy will prepare so saudi arabia accordingly declared well, obviously there is a game here, maybe even china more well, who is the most powerful, respectively means the player well that's why such statements are made, according to which , most likely, ukraine will be the object of pressure, with the fact that we have to give in to something, but we will not blame in advance, we will look at the proposals accordingly, but the only option to stop the war is to help ukraine so that russia suffers accordingly, defeats and the more painful this defeat will be for her, the longer period of time we can talk about peace . that's how it will be . let's move on, tell the devil, spineless silence or sit down for the truth, such laws of the kremlin for their own citizens, despite the fact that they claim great support for putin's war in ukraine and, in general , the politics of the kremlin's policy, even in the russian federation there are

in the financial world, the resurrection of the acronym bric and other nations saying that they want there an alternative choreographed groupings of nations that will go along? we see india buying a lot of russian oil. they're pushing back on america's strength, america's preeminence and that could pose a threat. >> absolutely. the reality is that china in particular has huge global influence as we speak. russia lesser so. so iran considerably less. china does. the united states has got to be quite aggressive here and working with our own allies. one of the things the biden administration has done in taking off and strengthening what trump started, that is working with our allies and partners, not only in the region but other places in the world. we have to do more of that. we cannot take for granted old relationships when we're dealing with this behemoth that china is seeking to dominate the world economically, dominate technologically, militarily and geo politically. they're about that every single day. we've got to get organized and work with our allies and partners to push back.

of the work that we have done before that in approving the background check system, the so-called brics next, national background check system, following the sutherland spring shooting. but one thing i am unwilling to do is to erode the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. law-abiding citizens are not going to commit these heinous acts. they are not going to commit crime. they are not going to be suffering from a mental health crisis, and lash, out and be a danger to themselves or others. and so i wonder about the focus on the firearm as an inanimate object. and then adamant objects won't cause harm to anyone. but it does, what does matter, if the person possessing that firearm, and certainly our focus has been keeping them out of the hands of people criminal records and people with mental health problems. one of the things i worry about, as the focus on the firearm that we have heard so far deflect our attention from other places where i think we could make a substantial difference. things like focusing on the criminals, the committed 836 homicides last year in chicago alone.