under british rail, the _ £100 million invested in services. under british rail, the previous.e previous nationalised system, the - under british rail, the previous. nationalised system, the number under british rail, the previous- nationalised system, the number of people _ nationalised system, the number of people using — nationalised system, the number of people using the _ nationalised system, the number of people using the railways _ people using the railways was falling — people using the railways was falling so— people using the railways was fallina. ., ., people using the railways was fallina. ., falling. so what do people in darlington — falling. so what do people in darlington make _ falling. so what do people in darlington make of- falling. so what do people in darlington make of trains . falling. so what do people in darlington make of trains in | falling. so what do people in - darlington make of trains in public ownership. irate darlington make of trains in public ownershi. ~ . ownership. we have lived tlud throu . h ownership. we have lived tlud through that _ ow

i remember british rail being absolutely ghastly . british rail being absolutely ghastly. british rail being absolutely ghastly . nothing about it seemed ghastly. nothing about it seemed to work whatsoever . and then to work whatsoever. and then privatisation came along. in the 19805. privatisation came along. in the 1980s. and i do believe there are areas telecoms, for example, where privatisation has been a huge success given more consumer choice, given better value for money. and i think that privatisation project was the right thing to do all those years ago . but there are areas years ago. but there are areas around utilities and who knows, perhaps even railways, where i begin to ask myself a question have we actually got this right from what i can see of our railways today? and i'm going to, you know, get rid for a moment of the strikes that have bedevilled it for the last couple of years from what i can see of our railways today, there are too many lines on which there are problems and delays. the price of travelling, if you go last minute off peak, say from london,

and there wouldn't be a big bang where suddenly british rail back!would be that as the existing rail franchises which are run by commercial operations come to an end, they would be taken over by a publicly owned company or the department for transport, essentially the government. and labour are saying that would take about five years, to bring all of those existing franchises back under public control. they are talking about the impact that would have on reliability and general railway service. although there is a bit of, i was going to say a plot twist but i'm trying to come up with a railway version of that... i don't know, a leaf on the line? a leaf on labour's line! is that terrible? it is the usual quality of newscast. let's put it that way! the leaf on the line for labour when it comes to this is that the government is actually doing a sort of version of this already. to give us his analysis, here is chris mason who was with keir starmer in the north—east of england today. hello, newscasters, from newton aycliffe in county durham, the home of h

. - under british rail, the previous nationalised system, _ the number of people - using the railwaysnalised system, _ so what do people in darlington make of trains in public ownership. we have lived through that before. they didn't have the problems. every day there is a delay. i almost missed an exam. do you think nationalising the railways is a good idea? if do you think nationalising the railways is a good idea? if they can sort all the — railways is a good idea? if they can sort all the strikes _ railways is a good idea? if they can sort all the strikes out, _ railways is a good idea? if they can sort all the strikes out, yeah. - railways is a good idea? if they can | sort all the strikes out, yeah. some --eole sort all the strikes out, yeah. some people will — sort all the strikes out, yeah. some people will be _ sort all the strikes out, yeah. some people will be thinking, _ sort all the strikes out, yeah. some people will be thinking, never- sort all the strikes out, yeah. some people will be thinking, never mind who owns the railways, what about all the strikes? we have more

british rail . britain were nationalised? british rail. turning up british rail sandwiches were the shorthand for torture for prison food . and of course, we saw food. and of course, we saw endless strife . acas would endless strife. acas would renationalising put the unions back in control. goodness knows we see enough strikes at the moment, but a large number of voters seem to like this idea. 69% of conservative voters would like to renationalise the railways, and 85% of labour voters. that's the big thing today. do you think getting railways back into public ownership is a first class idea ? ownership is a first class idea? get your ideas across your comments gbnews.com. forward slash your say this is your show as much as mine. but slash your say this is your show as much as mine . but now it's as much as mine. but now it's time for your latest news headlines. and it's tatiana sanchez. >> martin thank you. the top stories this hour. the >> martin thank you. the top stories this hour . the scottish stories this hour. the scottish conserv

it used to be back in the old days of british rail . forget days of british rail. you if a route was too popular, they would just cut back services because the taxpayer was picking up the loss all the time. the train. a lot of the train firms now wash their face on an annual basis, not for investment, but for the running costs on many of them. these they are profitable because you have a motive where you've got you've got the bosses actually trying to sell tickets and trying to get people on the on the trains in the first place. okay. and i don't see in any way how labour is going to improve that just by by saying we're going to nationalise stuff. >> okay. let's get your thoughts on defence. one thing that tory voters have appreciated in the last few days is this massive defence bonanza. i think it's like 70, 80 billion, 5 billion over the next couple of years and cutting back on the civil service to pay for, yeah, 70,000 civil servants. so james murray from labour, he said this a bit earlier . earlier. >> well, you're absolutely right that we want to get to 2.5. w

benjamin butterworth can't wait for the return of british rail.it out and see who we think prevailed. seconds out. round one. benjamin, you kick things off. >> well, i think that labour's plan this week makes a lot of sense. and the polling shows, if i dare mention polls in the presence of ben leo, that most people agree the fact is that since train services were privatised in the 1990s, we have seen the costs of travelling by train go up enormously. and yet we haven't seen a massive fall in the cost to the state. so we still, as taxpayers, subsidise the rail industry to the tune of about £5 billion a year. meanwhile the profits for private companies that can't even make the trains run on time, something that i think is pretty basic in a modern society like britain, their profits have gone through the roof, so what labour has said, and i think this makes practical sense , is this makes practical sense, is that as the contracts elapse for those private companies , they'll those private companies, they'll go back into public ownership so that you ca

i found british rail pretty good, but but i mean, i don't think that nationalisation is not kind of anological thing anymore. with labour, he scrapped the idea of, of the utilities, rail is the only thing on the list at the moment that is to be nationalised. >> no, paul, the one point that labour makes that i think is easy to make, but so fundamentally flawed is that profit is waste. profit is actually what you pay for efficiency. >> it's worth pointing out at the start , the system is the start, the system is actually so nationalised already. i mean, what we're talking about here is the trains and not the track, and there's been a tendency towards nationalisation since covid. but just getting back to the sort of thrust of your question, i think the weakness in the national nationalisation position is the answer to the question, where's the investment going to come from? because since privatisation happened, one, there's been a massive expansion in the amount of rail travel. and two, the private sector has put up the money for much of the investment in it. so if the weakness or so—call

i found british rail pretty good, but but i mean, i don't think that nationalisation is not kind of anical thing anymore. with labour, he scrapped the idea of, of the utilities, rail is the only thing on the list at the moment that is to be nationalised. >> no, paul, the one point that labour makes that i think is easy to make, but so fundamentally flawed is that profit is waste. profit is actually what you pay for efficiency. >> it's worth pointing out at the start , the system is the start, the system is actually so nationalised already. i mean, what we're talking about here is the trains and not the track, and there's been a tendency towards nationalisation since covid. but just getting back to the sort of thrust of your question, i think the weakness in the national nationalisation position is the answer to the question, where's the investment going to come from? because since privatisation happened, one, there's been a massive expansion in the amount of rail travel. and two, the private sector has put up the money for much of the investment in it. so if the weakness or so—called w

. _ under british rail, the previous nationalised system, | the number of people using the railways wasrains in public ownership? we have lived through that before. they didn't have the problems before. every day there is a delay. i almost missed an exam. do you think it would be a good idea to nationalise? with all the strikes, yes. people will say, what about these strikes, we have more strikes coming up shortly and some people might think, a labour government, with their mates in the unions, things could get worse, couldn't they? well, let's look at the record of the last labour government and what is happening now. we have more strikes than we have had for years under this government. but you could be prime minister in months and people will want to know how you would resolve the strike and pay people more to do it? we will get in the room and negotiate and come to an agreement to settle these strikes. the election nears, the argument sharpens, the scrutiny notches up. chris mason, bbc news. finally this half hour. this is japanese olympic ski champion ryoyu kobayashi and he is on a

i'm old enough, sad to admit i remember the sad old days of british rail, where they sold coffee by the, and we will be going back to that. timetables will be worse, strikes will be worse . worse, strikes will be worse. but if the taxpayer is no longer propping it up, which is what i think i've just heard from the labour party. three cheers for that. >> choose chair. those chairs carry , well, the figures are carry, well, the figures are last year the state subsidy to . last year the state subsidy to. the 14 rail companies was 12 billion. that's just 22 to 23. 12 billion in taxpayers money. that's over £420 per household, including those of us who never, never get a train north because rather go in a car. i mean, it's just completely insane. so i and i can't see how this is going. i share mark's view that it's not necessarily going to be run any better. why? why would it be? and i, being old, also remember the days of dog eared cardboard sandwiches and slop supposedly being coffee or tea , and it being coffee or tea, and it being coffee or tea, and it being absolutely the dirty, smelly

i look at british rail. it was actually a success because it had... rail.because it had... was it? since privatisation, _ because it had... was it? since privatisation, you _ because it had... was it? since privatisation, you know the - because it had... was it? since - privatisation, you know the numbers, there are a billion more passenger journeys and passp susnjar service improved up until the pandemic. nothing to do with privatisation because the london underground has gone up by the same amount, it is to do with the fact that people want to use the railways because of congestion on motorways and so on so that has nothing to do with privatisation, nobody a set of these privatised companies that they are so wonderful, they have improved services. �* ., ., , so wonderful, they have improved services. �* ., , , , . services. and what about this public mone that services. and what about this public money that labour _ services. and what about this public money that labour are _ services. and what about this public money that labour are not - services. and w

this is about, you know, learning the lessons from from british rail from the past, but also learning look at, you know, british rail in the past, it was, you know, arguably much too bureaucratic . arguably much too bureaucratic. engineers were put first rather than passengers. and then if you then look at privatisation in recent years, you know, the key aims of privatisation were increasing efficiency, increasing efficiency, increasing competition, reducing pubuc increasing competition, reducing public subsidy. you know, it's failed on those counts, you know. so we need to learn the lessons from previous public and private models of delivery and set up our new great british railways now, which would have all of the franchises operated from great british rail. so it would be a unified system, but making sure that the private sector would still have a role in terms of open access providers and private freight as well. so it's a pragmatic solution to the fact that the railways right now are broken and passengers deserve better. >> james murray, good to see you this morning. thank you ve

to re—nationalise the country's rail network within five years if it wins the next general election. labour wants to set up a publicly—owned organisation — great britishtracts held by private firms as they expire. almost 70% of uk voters support bringing rail back into public ownership according to a recent poll. but the government has called the plan �*unfunded' and �*pointless�* and warns it will mean tax rises. those are your business stories, you are watching bbc news. israel's war cabinet is meeting to discuss the military operation in rafah in southern gaza. israel says its plans to launch an assault on remaining hamas battalions in rafah. washington has warned israel not to carry out a full—scale attack without a credible plan to protect civilians. more than a million displaced people are taking shelter in rafah. the white house has challenged israel to say how it could safely evacuate civilians from the area. merlyn thomas from bbc verified has more. israel has signalled its intention to carry out an offensive on rafah. but prime minister benjamin netanyahu hasn't specified when this will happen. currently, there are estimated to be at least 1

to re—nationalise the country's rail network within five years if it wins the next general election. labour wants to set up a publicly—owned organisation, great british they expire. almost 70% of uk voters support bringing rail back into public ownership according to a recent poll. but the government has called the plan unfunded and �*pointless�* and warns it will mean tax rises. apple lost its crown as china's biggest smartphone seller in the first quarter of 2024 according to preliminary data from research firm idc. chinese firms honor and huawei were tied for the top spot, with honor�*s market share rising to 17.1% and huawei's share climbing to 17%, while the iphone maker's market share fell to 15.6%. coming up, from flight attendant to ceo. the first female boss ofjapan airlines talks gender stereotypes, and how crew training saved the lives of 367 passengers earlier this year. around the world and across the uk. this is bbc news. to japan now, where the national airline sent shockwaves around the country earlier this year when it appointed mitsuko tottori, a former flight attendant, as its first ever female president and ceo. fewer than 1% of j

this isn't going back to the bad old days of complete british rail nationalisation.g taken one by one. a great number of franchises are already run by the government. now people can make their own views as to whether , southeastern is it whether, southeastern is it works particularly well or not. run by the government as things stand. but, the question is, is this actually that big a pledge? will things actually change all that much? we were looking at some pictures there of that blue train going out of king's cross station called lumo. that's what's known as an open access carrier. that one actually won't be nationalised under labour's plans . they're going to leave plans. they're going to leave that one still private. so are they actually going to change all that much ? all that much? >> well, the first major change, which everyone's very excited about, in fact, the conservatives are going to do as well, which is to rebrand everything. so you're not going to have southeastern or northern, you're just going to have one brand for the railways. what that means in prac

government announces a kind of zeiten-wende, prime minister rishi sunach said that the british defense industry will work on war rails , and in general , britain is increasing defense spending at... the fastest, most massive rate in ages, as the british leader of this generation has said. so, today i am announcing the largest strengthening of our national defense in a generation, by 2030 we will increase defense spending to the new base level of 2.5% of gdp, it starts today and will steadily grow. every year, over the next six years , we will invest an extra £75 billion in our defence, which will be fully funded without any increase in borrowing or debt. bohdan, please tell me whether it is possible to say that the announcements from the european allies are taking place against the background of the news from the congress, where after six months of blockades , funding of 60 billion for ukraine is still being advanced, is it possible to link the aid of the united states yes, everything is connected, but there are two we can say, the opposite points: on the one hand, the europeans, of course, have been closely monitori

i mean, what they did to british rail, the way they carved it up just means we have got a rail systemnking to myself, you know, when you go to business school, when i had three years of business school, shareholder value, the only reason a business exists is for shareholder value. i was amazed when i heard that mantra shareholder value. now the shares of our water company not uk people, they're in china. there are all sorts of people. so they run their business. if it means sewage gets a better profit for the for the shareholder, that's what they're going to do. so you're right, the focus is not on i thought business was one for the community. business was run for the customer. business is run for the employee. no it's shareholder value. and that's what we're seeing here. and now. now what we had in 2008, the global financial crisis, we chucked billions at a global financial crisis because the banks couldn't fail. i wonder if that's the same here with water. the water companies can not fail, but looks as though they may, dogs. >> now, chris, you've had a few dogsin >> now, chris, you'

the british from the fact that the british prime minister says that britain is transferring the defense industry to war rails. i don't think there will ever be a shortage of beer, gin and whiskey in the uk, never mind. no, i think that's more of an exaggeration, isn't it changes, and great britain will increase its military budget not immediately, it will be sometime in the next four or five years. and i don’t think that anything will change so much, but what will be interesting is that all western ukraine, including great britain, they are very attentive to this war, those who are in ukraine, they learn from that war, because this is the first drone drone warfare in history in general, and they learn, and this then affects reforms, changes in all weapons... in the west, including great britain, because there is a lot to learn, western members of nato, everything that they they see exactly how the russian army fights and how ukraine has the ability to defend itself. one more question, yes, this is, i already read an article somewhere that this is already yesterday's drone war, and today is... the so-called a

we would establish great british railways, a single entity to control passenger interests. i'm afraid i was overruled on calling it railitish railways and holding into account on behalf of passengers everywhere. unlike current ministers, i will trust the experts. experts who don't just come from the rail sector because we all know it can sometimes because we all know it can sometimes be a bit inward —looking, but external experts in providing exceptional customer service. we will deliver simplified fares and ticketing, a best fair guarantee across the network as train line has across the network as train line has a ready manage to achieve, and we will roll out the kinds of innovations, digital season tickets and automatic delay repays so they are available to all. we will create are available to all. we will create a tough new passenger watchdogs that will hold great british railways to account on behalf of the passenger based on performance and on the quality of the service they provide. we believe that customer experience matters and it matters to growing our railways. i know what some are going to say. same old labo

railways all run in england by a new company called great british railways, effectively the new british railprove train reliability and affordability and inevitably taxes will rise to pay for theirs.- will rise to pay for theirs. thank ou ve will rise to pay for theirs. thank you very much- _ will rise to pay for theirs. thank you very much- -- _ will rise to pay for theirs. thank you very much. -- pay- will rise to pay for theirs. thank you very much. -- pay for- will rise to pay for theirs. thank you very much. -- pay for this. | ukraine has begun using long—range ballistic missiles that were secretly provided by the us against invading russian forces. president biden personally approved the shipment after russia began using similar weapons it had secured from north korea. the missiles are part of a $1 billion aid package for ukraine that was agreed in march. spain's prime minister says he's stepping back from public duties while he considers whether to resign over corruption allegations against his wife. pedro sanchez made the announcement after a court launched an inquiry into begona gom

and dr. demick sporting that concern about is rails world goes up the calling for the british government to suspend the provision of weapons to israel saying the u. k. as in breach of international law, they also say the government must work towards an immediate and permanent ceasefire and stress about position through the un security council. the noise say the u. k, must urgent to impose sanctions on senior members. a v is really government who made statements in sizing genocide where states adding to this revelation by a conservative m. p. sharing a parliamentary, far in a fast committee that the government's own lawyers issued advice, but israel had breached international law. the foreign secretary david cameron avoid the don'ts ring. so you've never had a piece of paper in front of you by a, for an office lawyer that says the israel's, and breach of its international humanitarian commitments on jessica. in general. i like the reason for the officers with an account were cool. every single bit of paper has been put in front of me. and so i didn't want to answer that question. one of t

british railways, a single directing mind to control our railways. yes, we are keeping the name, i'm afraid i was overruled and calling it rail britannia. the innovations your child here. —— trainline. we will create a tough new passenger watchdog that will hold great british railways to account by having the passenger, lawful performance and on the quality of the service they provide, because we believe the customer experience matters, and it matters to growing our railways. i will experience matters, and it matters to growing our railways.— to growing our railways. i will show some pictures _ to growing our railways. i will show some pictures that _ to growing our railways. i will show some pictures that came _ to growing our railways. i will show some pictures that came in - to growing our railways. i will show some pictures that came in earlier| some pictures that came in earlier when former president trump was heading his court case in manhattan, which is where he is on trial over a hush money case and a conspiracy to cover up a sex scandal ahead of the 2016 presidential elections. let's listen in to the supporters who made him ——

are promising to renationalize all passenger rail services within five years if they win the next election. the party says a new public body, great british will inherit the existing contracts when they expire, taking on responsibility for running all services. here is the labour leader. >> i want our airways to work properly, with absolute focus on passengers. at the moment, i think anybody using the railways would say they are pretty dysfunctional. there is record numbers of delays and cancellations. you've got prices on fares that don't match the quality of the service. and then you have the government stepping in with huge subsidies. the privatization has not worked. it has deteriorated. our job, if we are elected into government, is to pick this up, fix it. christian: as you would expect, the tory government has been quick to dismiss the plans. here the transport secretary. >> they have no idea how to pay for it. there will be increased costs. if you nationalize those country -- those companies, you have to hire civil services to manage that. christian: joining two discusses the editor of modern railway magazine. good to have you wit

so labour really is touching a third rail of british politics.reen belt. the green belt actually is 13% of the land mass of the uk. it's a huge area. labour are saying that a dearth of housing is no good for growth, and this is true. where is growth going to come from in the economy? well, growth often comes from housebuilding and we've had slow housebuilding and we've had slow house the last house building in the last decade or so, and indeed we've had slow growth. a of people had slow growth. a lot of people would say that's not a coincidence. the tories, for their part, they accuse labour in this time honoured phrases of tarmacking over the green belt . tarmacking over the green belt. i would just add tom and emily as a point of fact , that the as a point of fact, that the green belt isn't actually getting smaller, it's getting bigger and bigger. the green belt, by total size, by total acreage, is now more than twice the size of what it was back in the size of what it was back in the late 1970s, as local councils have added to it year in, year

decider that i guarantee government procurement for british military companies, it means that, well, what we tell ourselves that we need to get on the railsre passing, we have chances that we will build our policy in such a way that we really can, and events will not guide us, but we events, but to finish our conversation, there is such an optimistic idea, i... i am sure , that optimism should be present, no less, an indicator of the validity of this optimism is that we have been fighting for 2.5 years during this one of the largest armies in the world, and we are still enduring it, of course, sometimes you just don’t have to come up with anything, just lead by example if they understand it, being safe for now, thank god, we definitely need to think about it, well, maybe that's just why they are safe, because they believe that we are the force that restrains russia from any other actions, not only we. stuck in this situation, is russia stuck up to its ears in it? they also say that helping us is, relatively speaking, not just an investment in the future, but it is an investment in the future, even so cheaply, that is, there is no need to

statement that i guarantee government procurement for british military companies, it means that well... what we say to ourselves that we have to go on the railsve chances that we will build our policy in this way, that we will really be able to, and we will not be guided by events, but by events, but to finish our conversation, there is such an optimistic idea, i am sure that optimism has to be present, at least an indicator of this justice, that we've been at war for 2.5 years during this even... one of the biggest armies in the world and we 're still taking it, of course we just don't have to come up with anything sometimes, just lead by example if they understand it, being safe , for now, thank god, we definitely need to think about it, well, maybe that's just why they are safe, because they believe that we are the force that restrains russia from any other actions, not only we knots in this situation, russia is tied up to its ears in it, they also say that helping us is, relatively speaking, not easy. investment in the future, and this investment in the future is still so cheap, that is, there is no need to explain to mothers and other vo

rail and buses. it's just they can't be british ones.this is a i think again, i think this is a very sensible policy. >> well, there you go. let me know your thoughts that. adam know your thoughts on that. adam on says i'll be on on our website says i'll be on the streets michelle if the streets soon. michelle if the streets soon. michelle if the cost rent, cost of living the cost of rent, cost of living continues it is, it's continues as it is, it's unbelievable. i hope not, adam. i've got to say, david says this whole notion fining rough whole notion of fining rough sleepers , it's a stupid law from sleepers, it's a stupid law from this government, he sleepers, it's a stupid law from this government , he says. sleepers, it's a stupid law from this government, he says. john says, how on earth do people expect any rough sleepers to pay fines of up to 2500 pounds? this is a stupid idea. that's not been thought through. >> now, paul , been thought through. >> now, paul, paul been thought through. >> now, paul , paul says a lot of >> now, p

promising to renationalise nearly all passenger rail services within five years if they win the next election. the party says a new public body, great britishall services. here's the labour leader, sir keir starmer. i want our railways to work properly with an absolute focus on passengers. at the moment, i think anybody using the railways would say they're pretty dysfunctional. there's record numbers of delays and cancellations. you've got prices on fares that don't match the quality of the service, and of course then you've got the government stepping in with huge subsidies. so, you know, the privatisation has not worked. it's deteriorated under this government. ourjob, if we're elected into government, is to pick this up, fix it. as you'd expect, the tory government has been quick to dismiss the plans. here's the transport secretary mark harper. no idea how to pay for it. there are going to be increased costs. if you nationalise all those companies, you're going to have to hire civil servants to manage it. joining me now is phil sherratt, editor of modern railway magazine. phil, good to have you with us. is it nationalisation? it is phil,

rail overhaul in a generation. labour says it'll renationalise most passenger services if it wins the general election. and, history makers: meet the british sailors who are the first all—female crew to win a round—the—world yacht race. on bbc london, withjust a week to go until londoners vote coming up on bbc news, after a merseyside derby defeat, virgil van dijk questions his site's willingness to win the title. our livable out of the race? hello and welcome to the bbc news at one. she's been described as the post office executive who knew more about the horizon it scandal than anyone else. this morning, angela van de bogerd told the public inquiry that she was "truly, truly sorry" for the devastation caused to sub—postmasters and their families. she personally oversaw many of the complaints about problems with the computer system, and in 2019 was heavily criticised by a judge for giving misleading evidence during a high court class action which alan bates and fellow subpostmasters won. zoe conway reports from the inquiry. it's the biggest day of the inquiry so far for subpostmasters. angela van den bogerd, the woman they blame for causi

british. the israeli military now says it's sacked two senior officers. meanwhle, after pressure from the united states, israel has now opened up more aid routes into gaza. also this lunchtime... more misery for railkes over pay and conditions. i think it's terrible. i think we've not been notified enough about it. we've just got a taxi and the taxi driver didn't even mention it or anything. nhs consultants in england end their year—long pay dispute with the government. # my, my, at waterloo napoleon did surrender. # oh, yeah...# and 50 years on from the moment a little known pop group from sweden took the world by storm. and coming up on bbc news, the european championship qualifiers get under way for the home nations today, with the defending champions england taking on sweden at wembley. good afternoon. the israeli military has sacked two senior officers after the air

rail cruise missiles. this is a very, very serious act against israel. what happened our aerial defenses and abilities of the u.s. military and the britishce and french air forces as well as other players in the region, a very, very clear message to iran this just won't go. together, united, we saved israeli lives tonight. >> will you respond? >> it's a very good question. think what we are lookings towards the government today and the government will convene later today and make their decisions. and they will instruct the military accordingly. we have of course be prepared ourselves for eventualty and developments required. this is a very brave attack against the state is of ies real by iran. but it's not although it's different it doesn't change the reality we experienced over the last six months with all of iran's proxys have been conduct a coordinated orchestrated attack effort against israel from hezbollah and houthis in yemen and hamas in gaza. we are facing another development in the war effort where iran has clearly stepped up a notch against israel, and putting so many lives yesterday at risk where the country basically was engu

rail overhaul in a generation. labour says it'll renationalise most passenger services if it wins the general election. and, history makers: meet the british

money the they've lost the money of the british tourists going around to all the different eu, eu countries. it was it countries. it was it was it called inter—railing do that. but, but, but it's so them now it's not so open to them now because it feels like a closed shop because we're longer shop because we're no longer part this is , this part of the eu. so this is, this is another opportunity is to me, another opportunity to start door to cheap start opening the door to cheap labour and get the students to do . and labour and get the students to do .and i labour and get the students to do . and i think we'll find do it. and i think we'll find ourselves back in the same place we so alison, are you we were. so alison, are you fearful of the future and integrity brexit, if and when integrity of brexit, if and when labour gets into, you know, i think that the loss of working and opportunities for think that the loss of working and people,»pportunities for think that the loss of working and people,»pwaanities for think that the loss of working and people,»pwas aities for think that the loss of working and people,»pwas a veryfor think that the loss of