i mean, this decision -- to quote justice ketanji brown jackson dissent allegedly, reported dissent, said this is not a victory. it is a delay, and what this means for women in idaho currently is they do have some temporary relief, but it's quite problematic that the court did not decide this case on the merits. they had a chance to address preemption. does the federal law protect women who need abortion access and emergency care across all 50 states? they did not do that. they kicked it back to the lower court, and this is really troubling because we already know that a trump hhs and a trump fda -- first, hhs, would rescind this law. project 2025 and trump's cronies and allies have laid out recommendations to rescind this law should trump become president. also, this is so similar to the medication abortion case we just heard where they, again, punt on -- they punted on a technicality, right, on standing. they did not address medication abortion, so once again we have a possibility of a trump fda removing authorization to medication abortion, an incredibly popular and majority of ab

the dissent that ketanji brown jackson wrote. it is something i really commend everyone to read.and she takes the majority to task. i had the same reaction as she was speaking about the supreme court itself. both to justices thomas and alito in terms of the money they have taken as public officials, but also in terms of saying, you say you are an original list when it is convenient. that is this idea that we will only look at the text. she says okay, let's look at the text. the text is a congressional statute that says it is illegal to pay bribes and receive bribes and to get rewards. she says that's it. we are done, i thought you were textual list. that is why she says only this supreme court. this is supposed to be interpreting congressional language. it is not a policy debate in the supreme court and she calls them out, saying you are having a policy debate and you lose even on the policy debate. i mean, who on god's green earth thinks it is fine to take a reward as long as you take the money afterwards? just don't take it before. that is now the law based on this supreme cour

biden appointing ketanji brown jackson joins the conservative majority with trump appointee amy coney barrett in dissent with the court's other two liberals. of the more than 1400 people being prosecuted for the capitol ride, more than three and 50 faced obstruction charge. 27 are still serving their sentences for it. for trump, it is the basis for two of the four charges against him. but the decision does not rule out a certain prosecutions for those defendants who interfered with evidence. for examples, certificates for state electors that congress was counting. >> today's decision is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for donald trump. the charges against trump i think will have two be reevaluated but that's not to say that the prosecution under this law can't continue. >> reporter: also today the court decided to other major cases, both in a 6-revote. another opinion by roberts, the court overturned a 40-year-old decision, long criticized by conservatives, they gave federal administrative agencies sweeping power to regulate wide swaths of american life. in a decision by justice neil

chief justice john roberts writing for the conservatives and liberal justice ketanji brown jackson ruling that prosecutors went too far and cannot transform "this evidence-focused statute into a one size fits all solution to obstruction of justice," adding that prosecutors must prove a defendant somehow tampered with documentary evidence. justice amy coney barrett, who joined the liberal justices in dissent, pushed back -- acknowledging that the law was written in the business-crime context, but writing, "admittedly, events like january 6th were not its target. who could blame congress for that failure of imagination? but statutes often go further than the problem that inspired them." trump heralded the decision on social media, calling it "big news" for the january 6th defendants he celebrated on the debate stage and whom he's vowed to pardon as president. >> those people have been treated so badly. so we're asking, based on the decision, they should immediately be released, immediately, the january 6th hostages. >> reporter: tonight, the justice department says today's decision will not

as justice ketanji brown jackson made very clear in her opinion the ruling not a victory for pregnant patients in ohio, it is a delay. while this court dawdles and the country waits, pregnant people remain in a precarious position as doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires. the author of the forthcoming book "unbearable being pregnant in america." thank you for joining me. you understand this, the complexities of these issues better than most. but first the voracity of what we saw today, does it smack of the actual decision as you read it? and ketanji brown jackson is not mincing words about how upset she is. >> so many fascinating dynamics break down here. the first is the court did say a text of the decision was uploaded. we know it's a legitimate document. we don't know if it's a final document. it's funny how we're getting to peer back behind the curtain and the court looks like a hot mess so many times that happens. it could just be an error. that seems like the likalist reason and certainly reads. there's a small chance it was yanked because perhaps an outcome o

but as we were hearing from elie, justice ketanji brown jackson points out, this is essentially a delay in deciding the issues of this case. and i've talked with law professors who looked at the decision, the decision that came out yesterday and said this allows confusion to rein in other states with abortion bans, even in states that have exceptions for the health of the pregnant person. because in many instances i was talking with elizabeth separate the university of texas at austin school of law, and she was saying a lot of those states that have health exceptions, those exceptions are narrower than what the emtala federal law would state. and so there's still going to be a lot of confusion and other states, particularly in texas where are the biden administration has asked the supreme court to look at their abortion ban. and so we are potentially going to see this come back. but what a lot of folks have been pointing out today is that on both of the abortion cases before the court, this term mifepristone, the abortion pill. they did miss that based on standing. they didn't consider

as justice ketanji brown jackson made very clear in her opinion, the ruling is not a victory for pregnantatients in ohio, it is a delay. while this court.o's and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires. joining me now is senior correspondent at new york magazine and author of the forthcoming book, unbearable: being pregnant in america. erin, thank you for joining me, you understand the complexities of these issues better than most, but just first, the veracity of what we saw today, does it smack of the actual decision as you read it? and ketanji brown jackson is not mincing words about how upset she is. >> some of the fascinating dynamics to break down here. the first thing is the court did say that a text of the decision was uploaded, we know it is a legitimate document, we don't know if it is a final document. it is funny how we are getting to be her back behind the curtain so many times, and the court looks like a hot mess almost every single time that

what justice brown jackson clarified in her statement, i think is very important for us to pay attention to i think it's important to remember that abortion at any point in pregnancy is always safer than pregnancy i think we have really become to think about abortion as a political issue, yet abortion is a health care issue. abortion saves lives. abortion is absolutely necessary oftentimes in emergency room settings to protect the health of the pregnant person and to be sure that they are able to continue their lives and i think providers really understand that their hands have been tied post-roe here since the dobbs decision in numerous states and numerous parts of the country. so this isn't only about idaho. this is really something that all eyes are watching from multiple states across the country to try to figure out what we're able to do to provide basic health care, even if abortion has been restricted. other thing i would add is this emtala the ruling goes back to reagan. this is about emergency medical care and standing by people and taking care of them to preserve the health and

la jueza kentaji brown jackson recibÓ cuatro entradas para conciertos de beyonÉ.....ra su declaracÓn. para enfrentar la epidemia de sobredosis por drogas, principalmente de fentanilo, las autoridades recurren cada vez Ás a un medicamento salvador, la "naloxona"... y en tijuana, Éxico, donde hay zonas de gran consumo, una mujer sale a las calles armada de este anÍdoto, para ayudar a los Óvenes a suoerar una crisis... jorge fregoso no tiene la inspiradora historia de irma herÁndez, "la reina de la naloxona". al igual que aÑos anteriores, el festival del orugullo lgbtq + se inicÓ con un desfile... este aÑo el invitado especial para la celebracion es la estrella musical, ricky martin, ...romi de fÍas tiene las iÁgenes... fatal colapso de una terraza en un concurrido bar de san luis potoÍ, Éxico... y lugares de Éxico que sufren de una fuerte seqÍa se despertaron hoy con duras iÁgenes a su alrededor... si está cubierto tanto por medicare como por medicaid de su estado, hay algo importane que debe saber. ahora, usted podría recibir aún más beneficios de salud de los que ya t

and brown-jackson is not mincing words about how upset she is. >> so many fascinating dynamics to breakthe first thing is a court did say that a decision, or that a text of a decision was up loaded. we know it's a legitimate document. we don't know if it's a final document. it's funny how we're getting to peer back behind the curtains so many times and the court looks like a hot mess almost every single time that happens. it could have just been an error that seems like the likeliest reason. it's certainly reads that every single justice is itself. there's a small chance it was yanked because perhaps an outcome of a vote has changed. i doubt it. we'll find out tomorrow morning perhaps the next day when their decision is scheduled. >> what about brown-jackson that this is an appalling waste of court's time. we can't simply wind back the clock to how things were before the court injected itself into this matter with the dobbs ruling. it is too little for the court to take a mulligan and just tell the lower courts to carry on as if had not happened. as the old adage goes the court has made

brown jackson goes through the fax and says you have to be kidding.lion into contracts and then this public official shows up at the door and says that will cost you 15,000 and the company nickels and dimes it down to 13,000 and when law enforcement comes and says what is this, he lies repeatedly and comes up with a series of false stories to account for the money because he knows it is illegal. she is saying you have to be kidding. even if you think there is some areas in this law that could be vague, where there are some applications to some people where there may be a claim, it is not him and yet they basically said you are all for sale. >> trump wants to make all of the money tax-free because he is in nevada saying he wants to make tips tax-free so now he is saying if you are a public official and somebody gives you $1 million after a deal, that is yours, keep it all. >> it is just a tip and the idea that this is something you have justice thomas voting on just like they will be voting on the january 6 case, it tells you just the sorry state the c

in a scathing dissent justice brown jackson said that it is not a victory. quote, it is a delay.ious conditions as their doctors deal with what the law requires. jill wine-banks and mark joseph stern are back with me. what do you think of this ruling? what are the implications? >> you summarized it very ■çwel this is just a delay. it will eventually get back to the supreme court. this was decided on a procedural standing issue, that the doctors did not have grounds for proceeding. so it will eventually get back to them. it is off now, but it will get back up and people will continue to die and there is no other way of putting it. people are dying because of this and doctors are fleeing the state because they don't want to try to practice medicine in a place that doesn't allow them to use their medical judgment to take care of people under emergency treatment and labor act, which says you have to stabilize■ç someone so you don' die and that is what is happening here. this is all predictable in the same way that challenges to, for example, contraception and marriage will go away if

so even though i don't think there's any he equivalency between ketanji brown, jackson disclosures, and clarence thomas's disclosures, the underlying ethical issue here is still quite clear to me. if beyond say is in front of the supreme court can conjure brown jackson should step aside, and i'm sure she would can't say the same about clarence, can't say the same about alito tim for weeks, we were hearing from republicans that judge juan were shawn here in new york, could not possibly be impartial because he made $35 contribution to democrats in 2020 only 15 of that went to biden. >> the biden campaign, i guess specifically how can republicans make that claim while not even batting an eye at what's going on in these disclosure forms. >> that's the problem that i have, is that to be intellectually honest, you have to apply it to both sides. and so if you're going to say that justice merchan, the judge, marsha, and he has to recuse himself. you have to kind of go both ways on it. and that's why i do think that having some type of reasonable regulations in place that would really limit all

and i assume that bianna say and justice, brown jackson have a personal relationship that they biannaay, ask invited her and gave her the tickets for her husband and two daughters. that's would be four tickets. and i suspect that she really wanted to do it for them and for herself and but it doesn't have great optics. it really doesn't all of this, including the flag controversy how does all of this reflect on the integrity of the united states supreme court? >> you've covered the supreme court for awhile. >> well all when you're in the public eye you have to be like caesar's wife. and it's very difficult because things that seem perfectly normal in your everyday life chief justice roberts, for example, is criticized because his wife is a legal recruiter for law firms. well, she took that job. she stopped being a lawyer because he became chief justice. and she took that job because there wouldn't be a conflict of interest. but you can make almost anything look not great and you really, you, and i know this. i don't know about cnn, but i haven't ethics are i have to run everything that

. >> supreme court justice ketanji brown jackson and u.s. district judge richard gurgleis rights mn event marking the 70th anniversary of the brown v. the board of education decision. the discussion was hosted by the supreme court historical society as part of the national heritage lecture series. it runs about an hour. conversa] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations]■ >> good evening, everyone. i heard carter phillips, treasurer of the historical society.ancy but amuse a face and that directions what's a niceo/ c of there. i am asked tohe remind everyone, please turn off all cell phones, tablets, apple wes, even if in silent mode they can cause interference with the sound system in this courtroom so appreciate your assistance on that. obviously we walk in the this evening. this particular heritage lecture has been a long time coming. we began this in 1990 1990t the court packing plan and then privilege of doing it again in 20 came to celebrate justice marshall's 50th anniversary on the court, so it's sort of fitting we are now h

katanji brown jackson, she took beyonce tickets. i saw katanji brown jackson at the mark twain prize awards. i had to sit through a long comedy show and i am like, i feel really bad for you because if you're a republican on a private jet somewhere, this is really exotic instead of at the kennedy center. >> when we come back, joe biden is going to hollywood. here is a question. how much does star power help a campaign? we are going to dig in. we are >>> president biden is going to hollywood this weekend for a star-studded fundraiser. expected to attend, president obama, george tony, julia roberts. hollywood stars coming out to sport president biden, does that move anybody who is on the fence to vote for him, or to come out and vote, or could it actually hurt in some way, or is all this just a fundraiser? >> i've been thinking about this and i've been screaming from the low rooftops, and i don't think people listen to celebrities on who to vote for, but i do think that they will listen to celebrities about issues. i think if a celebri

i cannot say it better than justice ketanji brown jackson, said it herself in the dissent, where she says an absurd and abject reading of the statute that only this court can love. that is a direct shot across the bow at cavanaugh and the rest of them for this ridiculous ruling. >> to be clear, the statute in question criminalizes a bribe or reward. uses the term reward. ketanji brown jackson writing, as a general matter, everyone knows what a reward is, it is a $20 bill pulled from a lost wallet. a surprised ice cream outing after a report card of straight a's. the bar tab picked up by a supervisor. a reward says thank you for a good job rather than please, right? >> or $13,000. everybody knows what is going on here. and so we have kind of come again to the crux of the issue. what is congress going to do? that was a bill that democrats ran on in the past they couldn't get it passed, thank you joe manchin and kristin cinema. still haven't heard a great reason why they are against public eruption. but if democrats are not pushing a universal ethics bill, that applies to not only the s

-- including ket anji brown jackson.he pair are alleged to have been part of an effort to summit the names of fake electors from arizona to congress after the 2020 election in a bid to keep trump in office. joe biden won arizona by more than 10,000 votes. the biden administration is raising fuel economy standards for new cars according to updated rules from the national highway traffic safety administration. light-duty vehicles must meet an average of 50.4 miles per gallon by model year 2031. officials say the rules will save americans more than $23 billion in fuel costs. for passenger cars, this will require an increase in fuel economy but 2% each year starting with 2027 models, and it involves a similar increase for suv's and other like trucks starting in 2029. the new requirements are well below the levels the administration initially proposed last year. the u.s. labor market remains on strong footing. new data showed the economy added 272,000 jobs last month, more than expected. hourly wages also rose in may, gaining

la jueza brown jackson recibiÓ cuatro entradas para conciertos de beyoncÉ, el juez samuel obtuvo una llaman, la reina de la naloxona. >> irma es conocida la zona norte de tijuana como la reina de la naloxona. acompaÑado de sus perritos, recorre la zonas donde se registra una alta incidencia de consumo de drogas y de muertes por elecciones. entre sus pertenencias lleva naloxona, un poderoso medicamento de acciÓn rÁpida que puede revertir la sobredosis de opioides. >> ya que no pude ayudar a mi hijo. voy a ayudar a otras personas. otros chamacos que siento que las madres sufren. es un dolor muy grande. no se lo deseo a nadie. >> desde hace varios aÑos ayuda a quien no necesita aprendiÓ a infectar la naloxona pero sobre todo a detectar cuando un adicto esta sufriendo la sobredosis. >> no hay hora ni momento, a la hora que sea tiene que salir uno y ayudarles. es lo Único que nos queda. si alguien no lo hace, nosotros tenemos que hacer es ayuda. >> a pesar de sus esfuerzos ha logrado salvar a todos. al menos cuatro personas han muerto sus brazos. >> para mÍ ha sido frustrante cuando la pe

let's hear it for derel brown. jackson state university! [applause] next we have out of lowell high school, [indiscernible] going to uc santa cruz. future banana slug here. banana slug in the house. [applause] and next we have, aya [indiscernible] going to san francisco state university, local right here. go gators! [applause] congratulations. next we have, jeremiah jovana gomez! [applause] coming out of sota high school and going to uc santa cruz, everyone. congratulations. next we have out of galileo high school, kelly wu, going to san diego state! going down south. [applause] great job. next we have, out of academy, kalil going to san jose state university. go spartans! [applause] next, out of balboa high school, let's go bal, mandy going to williams college! [applause] alright. out of lincoln, let's see--actually , no. kipp sf college prep. nazir travis! [applause] out of lincoln high school, --going to cal poly! [applause] and out of galileo, we have waylen tang, uc irvine representing in the house! [applause] and last but not least, o

in this case ketanji brown jackson was concuring and dissenting. i want to read a little part.elay. while this court dawdles the country waits. pregnant people experiencing medical conditions remain in a precar yg position as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law require. she went onto say the court could have a chance here to say it trumped any state law from idaho to texas where there's a near total abortion ban, and it's stopping short of doing that. i want to read what justice alito wrote. he said it unbig wsly demands medicare funded hospitals protect the health of a pregnant woman and her unborn child. there's the sort of break down there, and of course this was the case a lot of people were watching because there's a big question whether or not in idaho women could get abortions that would save their future fertility and their health without having to be on death's door. i want to break down another decision, a 5-4 decision on perdue pharma in that case the supreme court decided to block a settlement that would have have multimillions of dollars for opioi

abc news reporter kim nguyen has more on what justice ketanji brown jackson wrote about the ruling, andnext. >> the u.s. supreme court ruled hospitals in idaho must allow emergency abortions when a woman's health is at risk, despite the state's near-total abortion ban. for now, justices dismissed the case, sending it back to the lower courts, giving the biden administration a temporary win. >> when we look at women's health and standard of care, many times that has to do with at that time what is looking at the health of the mother? what is the detriment? what is the care that's needed in order to preserve their life, but also the choices that they want to make? >> however, the highly anticipated decision did not rule on the merits of the case. justice ketanji brown jackson, in a scathing dissent, writing today's decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in idaho. it is delay. it comes after the court erroneously uploaded a document wednesday which appeared to reveal this opinion a day early. >> this is a rare slip up. the court rarely makes an error like this. >> also today, in a

. >> i want to read you this from justice ketanji brown jackson. we have squandered it.what the law requires, pregnant patients in idaho, texas, and elsewhere will be paying the price here tell me, to pay the price, what does that look like? >> this is an extremely unfortunate situation justice ketanji brown jackson is absolutely right. physician healthcare providers providing this care in emergency rooms in an absolute precarious situation. they still don't have the clarity they need in terms of whether or not they risk their careers, their livelihoods, their patients' lives to provide definitive care that is needed in these situations. the supreme court's missing the opportunity to provide definitive clarity on whether or not these emergency care, and absolutely what they are, when a woman's a pregnant person's life is in jeopardy, can be given definitive care that they need. this is absolutely a missed opportunity and does not provide the clarity that is needed. >> can i just add, this law in idaho bans abortions unless a woman is literally dying. it carries a prison

conservatives dissented saying the court should rule for idaho, and the newest justice, ketanji brown jackson, also said the court should move now but to rule against idaho. now we don't know when the court will release the opinions in this case officially. we do have more decisions that we expect on thursday and friday and possibly into next week. it's just one of several major cases that we're waiting on including those two involving former president trump, whether he's immune from prosecution for his actions around january 6th, and if he's not immune what can he be prosecuted for. jan crawford, cbs news, washington. >>> millions of americans across the midwest remain under threat of severe flooding with several major rivers still rising, and they may not crest until later this week. cbs' tom hanson spoke with homeowners in minnesota who pretty much lost everything. >> reporter: for days this house sat perilously on the river's edge close to minnesota's rapidan dam. then in a heartbeat, it was gone. jenny barnes' childhood home and half a century of memories. >> this is our life, and it's s

justice ketanji brown jackson writing that the court missed an opportunity to rule on the law. today's decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in idaho, she wrote. it is delay while this court dawdles and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position as their doctors are kept in the dark about what the law requires. and justice samuel alito, almost taunting his colleagues, saying the court should have ruled today to allow idaho's ban to stand. apparently, the court has simply lost the will to decide the easy but emotional and highly politicized question that the case presents. that is regrettable. >> and joining us now is terry moran. terry, you're a veteran court observer, and just two years ago, when the dobbs decision was leaked, it created a huge uproar. what do we know about what is reportedly an inadvertent release this time? how did it happen? >> the dobbs leak was an act of malice. it seemed. they never found out who did it, but it was done to try to perhaps influence public debate. this just looks l

. >> reporter: she may now get that day in court after the 5-4 decision that saw ketanji brown jackson joining to reject the plan shielding the sacklers. we are still waiting on two cases involving former president trump, whether he can be prosecuted for his actions around january 6th, and if so what. jan crawford, the supreme court. >>> boeing is being sanctioned by federal investigators for sharing nonpublic information about the door panel blowout investigation. >> we know the move crew closed the plug. they did not reinstall the retaining pins. that is not their job. >> the ntsb says during a media briefing on tuesday, a boeing executive blatantly violated the agency's investigative rules by providing information about the january blowout on an alaska airlines max 9. the ntsb also says boeing violated a signed agreement and speculated about possible causes. boeing said it deeply regretted what happened. >>> coming up, off the tracks. dozens of train cars derail in suburban chicago triggering an evacuation. >>> and disappearing act. how a soccer field in illinois gets swallowed up.

justices lucrative book deals and high price concert tickets bianna a gave for justice ketanji brown, jackson. welcome to our viewers here in the united states get around the world. i'm wolf blitzer, a you're in the situation room we're getting global reaction this hour to president biden's newest appeal to preserve democracy abroad and at home, cnn spread plank of the standing by frehse and berlin. the first that's going to cnn's kayla tausche. she's in paris. failure. the president spoke get point to hook the cliffs scaled by american troops. very brave pave american troops on d-day exactly 80 years ago. what was his message well, if it was a forceful message made even more powerful by the imagery that surrounded the president today. >> bright blue skies, turquoise waters in the english channel. he was flanked by utah and omaha beaches where those d-day troops came ashore on june 6th. a top those cliffs that those army rangers scaled to secure those nazi artillery and overlook positions. and essentially represented the beginning of the end of world war ii. and president biden in his message

and it's something that the justice you mentioned lulu, justice ketanji brown jackson worried about whens case was being argued before the court and april if someone with those kinds of powers could go into office knowing that there would be no potential penalty for committing crimes. i'm trying to understand what the disincentive is from turning the oval office into the seat of criminal activity in this country qarrah, assuming that we're talking about qualified immunity, which means it's kinda question of all will this change? how future presidents behave? well, they have new concerns about well, gee, this could be considered a private act, not an official-like, maybe that's not such a bad thing because maybe that's not to dry for president they can think a little harder about what they're doing in the case of trump. i just interviewed brad raffensperger, who was on that perfect. >> i call the georgia state. i think he thinks it was grinding. i think a lot of things and that should go to court and it should be decided in a court of law, in a public court of law, which is the way it's g

are newest justice ketanji brown, jackson, who happens to be the first african-american justice last year we found out that, oh for a given her a huge floral arrangement, congratulated her. and this time we've found out that bianna has get gave her for concert tickets totaling close to $4,000 now, we don't know when she went. we don't know who she gave the other three tickets to. we don't know what was plagued. we don't know anything yet to put billboard. i think his on it yeah investigative reporting. i do right. so in this thanks so much sure, thank. >> and still ahead. who will solve his final puzzle? patsy jack, about to take one final spin as host of wheel of fortune june 19th cnn bridge juneteenth with special performance is by john legend, hadi mobile, smokey robinson. >> everyone she celebrated juneteenth, celebrating freedom and legacy. wednesday, june 19 at ten on cnn actually have works first he makes it last held the power so you can rise from paying i see at morgan stanley old school hard work meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities. and relentless

let me go back with that framing in mind to justice brown jackson's concurrence/dissent. as the adage goes, court has made it's bed and it must now lie in it. your thoughts about the conversation that ensues in the next five months in the context of a campaign? >> so, it is important to note that again, the biden hhs that put out this guidance, a trump hhs will rescind it. so if the court is kicking the can down the road, the way professor murray outlined and i agree with her assessment, they're potentially leaving room for a trump presidency, a trump administration to finish the job of eliminating imtala. the same thing with medication abortion. a trump appointed fda, a trump fda could rescind authorization for medication abortion which was the whole point of the case. so when the supreme court circumvents making decisions here and does this stuff on technicality, they're opening the door for their -- for many of their cronies at the heritage foundation and project 25 to do what they've said and what they could do, which is undermine abortion care even further than they

get that day in court after the 5-4 decision that saw conservatives and liberal justice ketanji brown jackson to reject the plan shielding te sacklers. now, the court will release or opinions tomorrow and again next week as it looks to wrap up this session before the fourth of july holiday. we are, of course, still waiting on those two major cases involving former president trump, whether he can be prosecuted for his actions around january 6th, and if so, for what. norah? >> norah: very important. jan crawford, thank you so much. one of the top issues heading into the debate tonight is the economy. while unemployment is down and wages are up, so are mortgage rates and the price of groceries due to stubborn inflation, although they are starting to go down. cbs news senior business and tech correspondent jo ling kent spoke with voters about what they hope to hear from the candidates themselves. >> i want to keep building the strongest economy in the world. >> under biden, the economy is in ruins. >> reporter: what the candidates have to say on the economy is vital. watching in minnesota will be

earned between nearly $87,000 to almost $900,000 on book deals and royalties, with justice ketanji brown jacksonding the way for the advance on her upcoming memoir. justice brett kavanaugh was next, with a $340,000 advance for his legal memoir, due out next year. jackson also reported beyonce gave her four concert tickets valued at just under $4,000. and justice sonia sotomayor earned nearly $1900 for voicing a character on a pbs cartoon. now, eight of the nine justices' disclosures were made public today. justice sam alito, as is allowed under filing rules, got an extension. margaret? >> margaret: jan crawford, very busy as always at the supreme court. well, secretary of state antony blinken will press for a cease-fire in gaza and a hostage release when he travels monday to the middle east. meanwhile, the israeli offensive against hamas continues. today, israel defended its bombing of a united nations affiliated school where palestinian civilians had taken shelter. cbs's chris livesay reports from tel aviv. >> reporter: israeli forces showed no signs of slowing their pursuit of hamas around raf

conservatives dissented, saying the court should rule for idaho, and the newest justice, ketanji brown jacksonso said the court should move now, but to rule against idaho. >> norah: and jan crawford joins us now. and, jan, this could be so interesting. you could ask at this debate tomorrow night, would a trump administration have sued idaho to protect a woman's health? do we know, though, when this decision could become public but for real by the supreme court? >> jan: no. we don't know. we've got more decisions coming tomorrow morning and then again on friday, possibly into next week, and, of course, this is just one of those major cases that we are still waiting on as they wrap up the term. there are those two big cases involving former president trump, whether or not he is immune from prosecution for his actions around january 6th, and if he is not immune, what can he be charged with? we won't know which opinions are coming down until they actually announce them from the bench, and like i said, that could be anytime between now and sometime next week. >> norah: and we will break in tomorrow

as for his colleagues, justice ketanji brown jackson reported receiving a $900,000 book advance, plus four concert tickets worth $3,700 from pop superstar beyonce, and justice sonia sotomayor disclosed $86,000 in book royalties. the supreme court adopted a new code of conduct last year, although critics say there's no way to enforce it. lester. >> gabe gutierrez, thank you. >>> an emotional day in a federal courtroom in delaware as hunter biden's eldest daughter took the stand for the defense at his gun trial after prosecutors rested their case. ryan nobles is there for us tonight. >> reporter: tonight, hunter biden fighting back tears as his eldest daughter, naomi, testified in his defense saying in august 2018 she considered her father to be on the road to recovery from his drug addiction. it was the clearest i'd seen him since my uncle died. he seemed really great, she said. it was two months before hunter filled out that government background check to purchase a gun checking "no" on the form that asked if he was an active drug user. naomi testifying she introduced her dad to her f

[cheers and applause] justice ketanji brown jackson. a promise made and a promise kept.nd i appointed more black women to federal circuit court than any other president in american history combined. every single president combined. [cheers and applause] overall, we appointed 200 black judges to the federal bench, and guess what, the next president they will be able to appoint a couple of justices and i will be damned if we are not going to. [cheers and applause] look, if in fact we are able to change some of the justices when they retire, we are going to put in really progressive judges like we always had. tell me that will not changeyour life, when the justices are already gutting voting rights, overturning roe, decimated affirmative action and so much more. are we going to let that happen? president biden: we can't. we really can't. let's talk about trump's maga lies. i don't have an hour, but will try. he said he sent all the prolific relief checks. the truth is the congressional black caucus got that money passed. [applause] it came to all of us with the help of cbc

also revealing six-figure royalties or advances for books to four justices, including ketanji brown jackson, who also disclosed gifts last year of more than $12,000 for art to decorate her chambers, and concert tickets worth more than $3,700 provided by beyonce. today's filings are the first from the justices since the court released a formal code of conduct late last year. justice alito has yet to release his disclosure. he asked for an extension until later this summer, david. >>> now to the race for the white house. today, donald trump speaking about retribution and revenge, saying sometimes revenge can be justified. rachel scott covering the campaign. >> reporter: tonight, back on the campaign trail for the first time since he was convicted of 34 criminal counts, former president donald trump increasingly focused on revenge. >> i just went through a rigged trial in new york. [ booing ] >> reporter: in a series of interviews, trump implying that if he's re-elected he will seek payback against democrats, including joe biden. >> look, when this election is over, based on what they've done,

the newest member of the court's liberal faction, justice ketanji brown jackson, warning this is far from over writing. this. today's decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in idaho. it his delay while this court donalds and the country waits, pregnant people experiencing emergency medical conditions remain in a precarious position. the ruling comes just hours before president biden and the former president donald trump debate right here at cnn's world headquarters in atlanta, where we know abortion access will certainly be an issue. let's get to the policy first on the big decision i want to bring in cnn's joan biskupic. can carolina kitchener of the washington post, karoline. let me start with you. what changes, what changes right now, the walk us through the decision and how it impacts women's health today in idaho and potentially beyond this decision does. i'm very limited temporary relief for doctors in idaho. they can now provide abortions number situation. but the big news is really no news because the rest of the country is just in limbo. doctors in anti for some sta

i'd like to express the society's gratitude this evenin justice ketanji brown jackson. this is privilege of having her participate with thee duty tonight. first, she'll be at home. she'lle participant. after judge gerge'll join him ia conversation and discuss brown versus board ofducation as i suspect you all know, this is a pretty busy time forjustices of. so we we thank her for many duties. and we're honored by her cliche to say someone needs no irois absolutely true in this context. nonetheless, myoduce the introd. so i will fulfill my responsibilities. juste jackson was born in washington on september 1970. it's interesting that i at the saat that not the exact date, but the same day that the judge, constanwas born. most of you probably know about the judge. she was the first black woman to argue in the united states supreme court. first black federal district court. she argued ten cases in the supreme court and won nine of them. that is¥d come nowhere near. she played a significant role in the brown litigation with thurgood marshall. justice jackson grew up in publi