. >> i think this location is on the south side of bruning's. >> not north side. >> the north side. >> so my understanding it's near the hallway had a i can't think barbecue if i can say there's 3 restaurants at the four corners there's a lot of people moving in and out. >> i eat the sandwiches and go to the hawaiian barbecue but where would you recommend at&t be located. >> i thought that the best solution was in the driveway their speaking of. >> if there's a safety hazard who what other location would you recommend. >> i don't personally think that's our problem to solve. it's not a good intersection it's one of the busiest intersection >> understandiably and but it' in a bad space the martin luther king academy they have a wide right-of-way. >> so if you go burdening nos northeast or west it would be. >> it would be west directly west. so you're thinking san brunner west and sean brunners west side >> i believe that's the east side. >> yeah. the west side yeah, the north side is vacate. >> they have a wide area there. >> okay. thank you. okay. >> is there any additional public com

joining me tonight in our rapid response panel, michael brune, and dr. alter, conservation biologist. great to have you both with us. michael, you first. what do you make of the president's comments today in his executive order which he announced? >> well, we thought his speech was pretty strong, certainly when it is coming on the heels of the largest march in u.s. history on climate change, the president is under some pressure to make sure he actually holds a leadership position on climate change in the u.s. but what we really need is not just a good speech from the president, we need continued action from the president, certainly on keystone xl pipeline, follow through to switch from coal to clean energy. we need leadership on fracking as well. today's speech was a good start, but he has some significant tests over the next couple months. >> dr. halter, what happens in the next 20 years if we as a country do nothing? >> good evening ed and michael. it is an unimaginable scenario, spending over 36 billion tons of greenhouse gases this past year, if we c