well, actually, can we say that the declaration signed today will not become the second budapest memorandum declarative and it does not compel or encourage the signatory with us to take any specific actions, because all these actions are agreed negotiations between presidents and heads of governments several times regarding support ukraine will press for how long it will take, as today they have been voicing this formula for more than six months, it is such a convenient formula because it obliges very conditional relative things. that is, we will support you as much as serhii is needed until your last soldier or desire to fight but let's be honest , no one from our side can dictate to them an obligation to give such and such an amount of ammunition or such and such amount of equipment or aircraft and so on. i am very worried and worried about what will happen before the end of the year er, due to how our counteroffensive will take place and what will be the results on the battlefield, er, this aid may change its form in the states, the presidential elections are expected, and that 's the wh

look at it first, well, it's definitely not the budapest memorandum, although because these are not the so-called guarantees or what are they called , well, let's assume that the americans are objecting to the assurances, they are of a two-tiered nature, what was adopted in vilnius. this is just a declaration and it is called a declaration in support of ukraine, which in turn, it provides for the conclusion of bilateral agreements with the states of the big seven plus those states that join this idea already about the specific obligations that these states will bear to ukraine, and these agreements will have a bilateral nature and will be binding . that is this is in no way reminiscent of the amorphous budapest memorandum, which we are not uh now referring to, how viable is this idea and are there precedents in international uh politics of similar treaties to how viable is it in life, that is we will see this idea, international treaties exist between states on mutual support, including in the case of aggression and the need to respond to this aggression , there are so many such bilater

actually the next stage of signing. from the fact that they do not turn into another kind of budapest memorandum, because even kurt volker already said about this that it frees putin's hands in a certain way. here it is uncertainty in the conditions and time frames of the declaration adopted by the gs7 countries with ukraine, several important time frames are defined, first of all, it says that today , by signing this declaration, the members of the state of joseon begin a bilateral process with ukraine regarding the conclusion of bilateral agreements on security, i.e. here is the first time frame that in the first stages , our partners did not really want to fix it, but the ukrainian team and the ukrainian delegation managed to convince them that this multilateral declaration should not be just a separate document that was concluded and they forgot, and this is exactly what happened with the budapest memorandum. no, this is the first stage that will entail a complex of bilateral agreements . from the conversations of the president of ukraine with the leaders of the countries that signed this de

decision that they are not guarantees replacing nato membership that we don't need a second budapest memorandum, when empty promises have been given nuclear weapons, we will not give up nato membership for any promises because everyone understands and partners understand that the strongest, most powerful guarantee that there will be no more war in europe is ukraine's membership in the alliance, all other guarantees security this is good, but nothing will replace membership in nato, this is the principle position of the president, and it will be implemented in those decisions that are adopted . so, at the moment, repulses in all areas were reported in the air forces of the armed forces forces of ukraine, the next large-scale alarm this night was in ukraine, actually , the red areas and the work of the air defense forces, in particular , also stood out, and the defenders of the capital , due to the threat of the shaheds, the debris of which fell on five houses, residential buildings in five districts, this is obolonskyi podilskyi shevchenkivskyi solomyanskyi and darnytskyi districts, one dead per

what situation is ukraine contributing its ball a strategic mistake, not even regarding the budapest memorandumessment of the situation in russia , what is the question in the question that when china is put in the first place as a threat. for example, the hearing in the congress of the candidate to replace general mili is interesting . so he is asked what are the main threats he calls the first china, the second comes russia, someone says it's alphabetical order - each word has meaning, it's prioritization, and the chinese at one time taught me to listen to their own speeches, he says the order in which the subjects enumeration and how long everyone talked about absolutely and it matters, they determined and here we are at the summit that but i am convinced that china is not the main existential threat now at all for the present for the usa and i will explain why because china is not coming out and doesn't threaten doesn't say we will use nuclear weapons china doesn't come out with any secrets it is waging an aggressive war wait and here is the most important thing and what russia is doing is

as you said about the budapest memorandum, none of these promises matter if nato and other friends of ukraine do not demonstrate a real readiness to provide ukraine with any military support it needs to prevent the victory of russia , as we can see from the precedent at the moment aid in the form of military weapons in the future, everything will be different, a whole network of ties in the field of political security will be connected with ukraine, and the most important thing will be membership in nato, which at the same time, it will mean that an attack on ukraine will be an attack on the entire alliance , and until we achieve this, the main thing is that nato and the united states and their friends, such as japan and south korea , convincingly assure that if everything continues as it is now, there is a whole coalition of willing countries that will not just watching from the sidelines, there were talks about the fact that some nato members could provide military assistance on the ground, it is reported that when putin threatened to use nuclear weapons, bill benz, the head of the

morning's document, not all of them are exaggerating, but many of the experts refer to the budapest memorandumand the play on words begins when they say that it was not written there guarantees and others said, well, in the ukrainian language, one and two guarantees, but for the english language there are clear boundaries of a guarantee - these are guarantees, and the other - this is such an assurance that we say that what is written in this document in english is a guarantee or reassurance, first of all, i want to say that even in the absence of e-e guarantees for certain political or legal obligations, and ukraine received from its partners weapons worth tens of e-e billions of us dollars and literally today i saw the statistics of an international international agency about the fact that in ukraine there is the largest a-a increase in defense budget expenditures in the world, plus 620 percent in my opinion, and we understand that it is only a part is our own expenses, and the rest is actually a-a gifts from partners and all that was done without any legal documents and obligations. and what

vilnius buried budapest budapest memorandum on security guarantees of ukraine in 1994 by which ukraine gave nuclear weapons the third arsenal in the world instead of security guarantees that were then brutally violated by russia in crimea in donbass and then last year's invasion of ukraine everything it is over already it used to be actually the end and now reform instead of it now ukraine will have guarantees that the big seven will be opened as well as other countries today it was signed here as it is called what is the name of the joint declaration of support for ukraine with the participation of volodymyr zelenskyi and the leaders of all the g7 countries plus the leaders of the european union and the seven, i will remind you that the usa, canada , britain, france, germany, italy and japan, regarding japan , japanese prime minister fomioksid was the first to present this declaration, he is familiar with ukrainian affairs or has recently visited ukraine, do you know what bucha is? he saw with his own eyes and other crimes of russian troops in ukraine. so the president is indifferent

point of view about the budapest memorandum, none of these fighters matter if nato and other friends a real readiness to provide ukraine with any military support it needs to prevent russia from winning at the moment we see

and i keep saying that our situation is special because we had the budapest memorandum and now go outsideask and tell them, do you want this from a security guarantee , for example, so that it was traumatic , we do not believe in the power of attorney absolutely if absolutely absolutely convinced and similar security. an absolutely traumatic phrase is not faith and then despair and then they will say ok a can do something for us and that's why i say and we may have a lot of other options for this case already then let's have two-way here let's have three-way agreements, let's act together with others, we can hedge here and even if we had to decide later, i do not rule out the idea that directly regarding the support of membership , we could hold a referendum. and yesterday in vilnius, a crisis took place, a crisis of trust . i think that yes, it is not, it is not broken, it is not broken, this trust, but it was such a test of this trust. we passed this stage, you know how we came out as in some kind of business management system or in some kind of relationship. or somewhere in state manag

countries have adopted such a comprehensive agreement. countries during the adoption of the budapest memorandum, will this not be a repetition of a repetition , please no, it is not, it is not a repetition of the budapest memorandum, it is indeed a very serious and substantial support for the expansion support for the security guarantee that we expected from the four countries, as i said. now it has expanded at the level of jisaev to the g-7 - this is really the most powerful economy of the world, the most powerful financial resources , powerful armies of the world, and so on, that is, here it is a very big e- it is important at the intermediate stage before joining the north atlantic alliance. that is, it is military-technical assistance , financial-economic, political, very important for us. it is very nice that there is such an expansion. we thought there would be four countries. and you see it expanded to the entire seven, including japan. japan is a representative of a completely different region, so it is very important for us. i think it will contribute to the acceleration of our actions

what to do after the ninety-fourth year of the famous the budapest memorandum, where they vowed, uh,tern and russian powers to kazakhstan , ukraine, belarus, were provided with complete security. naturally. you know that the western state has trampled on all these agreements and declarations and no security. no, i meant economic security , including, well, what kind of economic security if they impose sanctions on russia against us, so i raised this issue in negotiations with the president of russia, he absolutely supported me in all areas and says we need to cut through all our treaties and agreements between belarus and russia and see hmm what kind of normative legal interstate character. it must be accepted now in order to ensure the complete security of belarus in general, this e sounded at the negotiations. so in case of aggression against belarus, the russian federation defends belarus as its own territory. these are the kind of security guarantees we need, by the way, in response to putin’s words , the bespectacled geek-mudovets prime minister, calling the so-called poland the

in nature, let me remind you that they tried to provide a guarantee within the scope of the budapest memorandum and you all remember how it ended. to be honest, i was unpleasantly surprised by the rhetoric of mr. volis, and he , by the way, has done a lot for ukraine, both objectively and great britain and he personally , but when he said that in britain on amazon and ukraine should thank you more often, so i would like to remind you that amazon , unlike great britain, which was the guarantor of ukraine's security, and you are wrong about amazon, is that the west remained silent when russia, with absolute impunity , seized part of the ukrainian territory without hindrance and occupied part of the ukrainian territory back in the 14th year therefore, there are no guarantees of real nuclear weapons except for the fifth article. accordingly, we must , on the one hand, understandably, first of all rely on our own forces, on the other hand, if we move from the strategic level to the operational-tactical level, any bilateral an agreement from any country, not necessarily with a nato country, any agree

these agreements, agreements, guarantees, security guarantees, and so on, what they say is the budapest memorandum, we have already passed it, it is not a memorandum. obliged to fulfill them, no one will retreat from them if we clearly understand that for example we mentioned the israeli option there 38 billion and say for 10 years, well, such a story is now only one germany 17 to the 27th, now the 23rd in four years, this is not 10, this is just one example, other countries increase aid and depending on their capabilities - this is of course yes, this is only the beginning. billion in the next 3-4 years against the background of this aid that we have already received there for 200-300 da in these it is supposed to be within the limits, but it is only the beginning, so it is really a very cool thing. i absolutely support this idea of ​​providing a guarantee because it is not even too much. so, when my colleague got involved, he said that there is too much, it is not necessary. i partially disagree with it. but what is nato’s fault? because when there is aggression against a country, nato is going

it was put on the shelves because many ukrainians hear that you signed the budapest memorandum and undertooko take care of ukraine, and now you don't you care about ukraine, about our sovereignty, and you don’t help us in any way, although we are grateful to you and even make cakes, naming them after boris johnson, yevgeny, how to arrange, how to distinguish emotions here , it is clear that we are all traumatized ukrainians who are going through this war, but how to distinguish between emotions, facts and uh, does the event actually help us or not, how to place accents well , let's start with mykhailo tkach's column, and the british uh, ministry of defense has eggs at 17 points per piece, it's hardly about training ground and everything else, the truth is further, uh, we had, we had the highest expenditures on the armed forces for the state defense order in the 20th and 21st years, where is it ? i don’t take other moments now. i take what happened in recent years, but we started the movement in nato in 1997. 26 years in july. 26 years during this time, you can teach a hare to smoke, ride a b

them the opportunity to stay only with a declaration and any of these decisions, including the budapest memorandumd not be forgotten; everything else must be implemented, they must be implemented through the development of mechanisms for their implementation, and this applies to, among other things, i have already emphasized this and the supply of weapons and the supply of equipment and the supply of ammunition and the production of production when i monitor now how individual states are behaving, they are motivated by this danger that looms over their states, they agree, including on the organization of production, on joint projects , large global joint projects in order to increase volumes of production of weapons , equipment, ammunition, using the fact that you are modern, modern technologies, in fact, the last visit of prime minister modi to france well it was simply the most vivid demonstration of what you and i already talked about today, how the conclusions about the course of this russian-ukrainian war about the actions of the aggressor caused the fact that a number of joint projects were

do not forget that the promise contained in the budapest memorandum, signed in exchange for ukraine'ssal of nuclear weapons on the territory of the country, is little worth any agreements that are not backed by military success remain on paper. unfortunately us secretary of state james baker has said twice that nato will not go east, in fact. this was a condition for the withdrawal of the soviet troops from germany, although the agreements were oral and baker said that he meant only germany. although the final communiqué spoke of eastern europe as a whole against the backdrop of the end of the cold war. no one betrayed this meaning more important then it seemed, the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe in artillery tanks. combat aircraft of the country , the participants in this complex document were deprived of the opportunity to conduct large-scale combat operations in europe, many experts began to call it the cornerstone of the european security, but in the ninety-fourth year after the collapse of the ussr, when the clinton administration gave the green light to nato expan

the opportunity to stay only with the declaration , and any of these decisions, including the budapest memorandumlse must be implemented, they must be implemented through the development of mechanisms for their implementation, and this applies, among other things, to i already emphasized this and the supply of weapons and the supply of equipment and the supply of ammunition and the production of production when i monitor now how, let's say , individual states are behaving, they are motivated by this danger that hangs over their states, they agree, including on the organization of production, on joint projects, large global joint projects in order to increase the volume of production of weapons , equipment, ammunition, using modern modern technologies, in fact, the last visit of prime minister modi to france well, he just was the most vivid demonstration of what you and i have already talked about today as conclusions about the course of this submarines and aircraft fighters and so on and certain types , including artillery weapons, so it is necessary to understand very well that the decision itse

membership with unclear consequences, and this of course, there should not be a repetition of the budapest memorandumhat these will be real guarantees and possibly real bilateral guarantees from the nato member countries , and the snakes report that it seems that an informal and secret meeting or negotiations took place between a group of former american his political officials, in particular richard a, who was in george's administration, was responsible for foreign policy, as well as for the settlement of the conflict in northern ireland, and it seems that the conversations were with the russian delegation together with the semi-minister, including with the minister of foreign affairs, lavrov russian. and the white house itself denies that it was, if it happened, then with his knowledge , nevertheless, it is assumed that this is a sounding of the position for future peace negotiations and what do you think about it nothing special i am sure that similar negotiation processes between american high-ranking officials, ex-high-ranking officials, do not mean absolutely today's ones, that is, citizens of

exist in nature let me remind you they tried to provide a guarantee within the framework of the budapest memorandumemember how it ended. i, to be honest, was unpleasantly surprised by the rhetoric of mr. volis, and he, by the way, has done a lot for ukraine, both objectively and great britain and he personally but when he said that in britain, amazon and ukraine should thank amazon more often , i would like to remind you that amazon, unlike great britain, was the guarantor of ukraine's security and not amazon, you are wrong because the west remained silent when russia was taken over with absolute impunity without hindrance occupied part of the ukrainian territory as early as 14 years ago, there are no real guarantees except for the fifth article of nuclear weapons. accordingly, on the one hand, it is clear that we must first of all rely on our own forces, on the other hand, if we we are moving from the strategic level to the operational-tactical level any bilateral agreement from any country not necessarily with a nato country any agreement from any country that is ready to provide real military-mi

now we understand that these were not security guarantees but nevertheless we believed in the budapest memorandumsia as one of the guarantor countries and what we got then we got, for example , the situation in crimea in the mid-90s we got tuzla in 2003, the signing after the signing of the great treaty of 1997 and a series of many more moments and an energy war in the 2000s , i.e. wherever we were in contact with the russian federation, it demonstrated its aggressiveness and began to spin of this hybrid war that has outgrown, we remember the incitement of donbass, the annexation of crimea in the 14th year and already a large-scale dimension from 2022, therefore the only one that vladimir vladimirovich putin should care about today is himself and his own environment, which have now led to such a state and before the rapprochement of ukraine with nato, look again, returning to this statement of his and about the neutral status of ukraine . what would suit him, even though it does not suit us ? hypothetically, if according to some model of former finland and former sweden or taiwan, we conclude an

possibility of transferring nuclear weapons to of the territory that was signed, not only the budapest memorandumut this is a worldwide agreement on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, however, a conversation began that we would like to see some future draft law , but it was already starting, it was three or four before panama, but already then this work began that when they heard that belarus is our enemy and that it is the transfer of nuclear weapons, this is the same topic that the activists together with the leader of ukraine who visited the senate opened their eyes that we cannot sit back and only like america cannot sit and think that those agreements protect our future, and they act as such an enemy who does not care about international agreements and what was agreed on nuclear weapons looks like he showed us in belarus that those international agreements on nuclear weapons are worthless now now and that's why uh this example how we opened our eyes uh in the congress about the affairs of uh armed our enemy that they haven't even thought about yet good sir thank you for joining the li

that the guarantees are not a substitute for nato membership because we do not need a second budapest memorandum the empty promises gave away nuclear weapons we will not give up nato membership for any promises because all

give you this, you know, despondency, because, in particular, against the background of the budapest memorandumther points , there is a somewhat skeptical attitude. some solutions, but for us it is important that they go into the objective plane, although at the same time we see that we are already being told and hinted at from the side of the united states that a simplified procedure is possible and will be for ukraine, but a simplified procedure and the departure of the discoverers who is mandatory for everyone in the defense, security, political, legal spheres, there will be no exceptions, this is also for us to understand . i think that we can be reminded about it, but here is the objective i see things in that, uh, it should be clarity on weapons, and because russia's demands will be rejected. i think this is obvious. well, i think that the russians will not be satisfied in any case, because their main demand is that we remain a neutral state in general, and they constantly emphasize this. thank you, oleksandr, for conversation it was oleksandr musienko, a military expert, and i will say t

russians agree on this agreement to transfer weapons to russia in exchange for the infamous budapest memorandum, warsaw was flowing, why exactly? it has already demonstrated its aggressiveness, it is worth talking about it with a nuclear expert but i think that part of the justification was that suddenly when the soviet union collapsed, three new countries with nuclear weapons appeared, russia became the heir of the soviet union. therefore, the transfer of nuclear weapons to poland in your example would also cause the spread of nuclear weapons in the fairy tale. but it was possible to transfer them to another nuclear power, for example, france , great britain or the usa, but he does not think that this was even considered in his book. you write about your experience of working in countries immediately after the collapse of the soviet union, and one gets the impression that the administration did not prepare very well for their diplomats to work there. can you tell us about your impressions of working in russia at that time armenia kyrgyzstan kesari tarifuziya so we decided that it is important

these guarantees are because we welcome the non-budapest memorandum as well. we absolutely know about all the leaders of the countries of the numbers really united, as well as the president of the european council, the president of the european commission, and it is really a great victory, a great success, but how uh, i would also like to say that today during the meeting of the nato ukraine council , unfortunately, it was not broadcast live, you know , many issues were discussed, security issues, but what we all heard was really very, very powerful, unprecedented support for nato absolutely no one doubts that in the near future ukraine will indeed become a full-fledged member of nato, and today this dialogue was, you know, as an invited country. it was a dialogue with partners. but you know that we continue to work, and as president zelenskyi says, there is no night in the impossible if it is the interests of ukraine and ukrainians, mr. andriyu, you know i, but you mentioned about ukraine joining nato, i would quoted one of your deputies, panazhokov, who said that there should be no

despondency because in the background in particular and there is a somewhat skeptical attitude to the budapest memorandum and other points. well, that's how it turned out, because the ukrainians are just statements or, let's say so simply, some solutions, but for us it is important that they go into the objective plane, although at the same time we see what we are already told and hinted at from the side of the united states that it is possible the simplified procedure will be for ukraine , but the simplified procedure and the departure of the openers, which is mandatory for everyone in the defense, security, political and legal spheres , there will be no exceptions, it will also be for us to understand. i think that they can remind us of this, but here objectively, i see things in the fact that uh, it should be clarity on weapons, and because the demands of russia will be rejected. the main requirement is that we remain a neutral state in general, and they constantly emphasize this. thank you, oleksandr, for the conversation. it was oleksandr musienko, a military expert, and i will say that we are worki

okay , i'm exaggerating, but many of the experts refer to the budapest memorandum, and the play on words say there was

have time, i have a few questions, and we we already have history, we have experience with the budapest memorandumwas supposed to guarantee our security, and one of the signatories defiantly violates this document and attacks our country, so we have a certain skepticism about such guarantees because there is a deplorable experience. i want to appeal to the president of lithuania now , our children all the while he called on the alliance partners to speed up ukraine's accession to nato under a simplified procedure and was looking for supporters of this idea, why joe biden did not react to such a proposal and whether there is even the slightest chance that he will still have time to react before july 11. well, we we also know that there will be no decision at the summit itself, there was not even a decision when they proposed for sweden or for finland , a quick such decision will be proposed. and we would like a formal invitation, but not by ourselves. took all the declarations made by that time, all the statements themselves, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, well, w

understand that ukraine is at the beginning. of security but nevertheless we believed in the budapest memorandumof the guarantor countries and what we got then we got, for example, the situation in crimea in the mid-90s. we got tuzla in 2003 already signing after signing the the treaty of 1997 and a series of many more moments and an energy war in the 2000s, that is, wherever we were in contact with the russian federation, it demonstrated its aggressiveness and started the spin of this hybrid war, which grew out of we remember the incitement of donbas annexation separately in the 14th year and already a large-scale measurement already since 2022, so the only person vladimir vladimirovich putin has to care about today is himself and his own environment, which have now led to such a state and to rapprochement of ukraine with nato, look again, returning to this statement of his and about the neutral status of ukraine. what would he be satisfied with? although he does not suit us. we know that we should be in nato - i am the only guarantee of our security , but conditionally and purely hypotheticall

stipulated that the countries enter into immediate consultations with ukraine, and this was in the budapest memorandum this is a point that causes controversial discussions, but we will immediately say , why? in order to immediately provide ukraine with the entire package of support and assistance that is necessary for it to cut off this aggression and immediately reacted to it, and thirdly , it is necessary to understand that a component of any security guarantee is not only measures of a military or economic nature, bringing russia to responsibility, establishing a fair peace, when russia compensates for the damage caused by maintaining sanctions before the territory of ukraine is fully restored, sovereignty is restored, these are also components of security guarantees , because many people may have had the impression that at some stage of some compromise , perhaps something will be relaxed somewhere , the allied countries have clearly stated that the component of their obligations regarding the security of ukraine is to maintain the sanctions regime , to hold russia accountable , to collect damages

this is the serious document, notjust a budapest memorandum.ve them but they have tanks, so those are bilateral specific deals for many years, or maybe for not a long period of time. it is a very important point, what is written in the declaration on the way to nato. i think it is so important, which we finally pushed through, and the partners agreed with that. we are not just partners agreed with that. we are notjust playing games, we really see ukraine in the future in the alliance. another story is about our polish friends. i would like to be sincere with you. no one raises such issues and we are not interested and nato countries are not interested to have those armed troops on our territory while we are not in nato. i think that our armed forces are enough, but the issue is in the innovative weapons of nato. but vice versa, if we look at the opposite situation, the partners understand that we have a powerful army and when we are in nato, then our military, ourservice when we are in nato, then our military, our service men, who have experien

use such a phrase as a security guarantee, because we already had security assurances in the budapest memorandumourse that until the fifth article of the washington treaty does not apply to us, that is , an attack on ukraine means a collective response of all nato members e- in this sense, any agreement cannot be called a guarantee of security , but a guarantee of security assistance. a month, a year or longer. we still need certain capabilities that will allow us to defend ourselves and deter future aggressions of the russian federation, and as far as i know, the ukrainian side has already conveyed to our partners exactly the vision of the defense forces that we want to have in order to be sure that any aggression from on the russian side in the future, it may be actually overcome and ukraine will be victorious. and actually this is the most important result that i hope we will get from this summit in terms of financial obligations from the point of view in terms of what capabilities they will give us, starting with what we already have and artillery and tanks, ending with conventional long-ran

here kuleba wrote that we do not need the second budapest memorandum.y. eh, intro. that is, we do not need, here are some simplified schemes, and joining nato is meant, but in fact, what we have in fact in fact nato is , in fact, a lapel turn, yes, that is, we will continue to support you. uh, well, by and large also understand, yes, that is, we will provide advisory support satellite support military support expert support. well, that is, here is what we have now. yes, well, in fact, well , a year and a half has been going on, they are leading it to the rank of legal memorandums of some sort, uh, these are agreements. that is, they will simply fix it on paper and nothing more. yes. uh, zelensky tried to sell, eh. and here my friend the idea that there was some kind of poll in ukraine last week . well, if he was at all, well, as it were, well, there were numbers. but i just don’t know if it was or wasn’t about what kind of entry into it is necessary there in odessa 57%, in kharkov 64, and i’m lying, it’s almost 97? well, that is, supposedly everything i

i think at this point, ukrainethough, us has more than fulfilled its obligations under the budapest memorandumf 1994. but right now we need to focus on how we advance american interests. >> here's my vision of how we should end this wa her vision r, is i would negotiate a peace it wty which would freeze the current lines of control exactly where they are, a korean warnes of style armiste agreement. >> i would further commit that nato would not admit ukraine to nato, but i would demandne something of even greater value from putin. >> russia has exit its military partnership with china. the china russia military partnership is the single greatest military threat that the united states faces. so i would end this war on terms that require dissolving the russia china partnership. >> i mean, on let all the way is how we deter xi jinping. >> well, let me jump in. when you say you divide the lines up as they are today, you mean just giving vast swathes of ukraine to putin? i dictator who's marched into a sovereign democratic country? you would just give him all that land he's taken by his murderous ra

the so-called declaration of money for implementation in the same way that ukraine signed the budapest memorandumear weapons. one of the reasons why the south koreans are now concerned about this nuclear threat is that we are watching, what is happening in ukraine, understand that ukraine is with nuclear weapons. it would not have been captured by russia, but now the moment has passed and they need security guarantees from russia precisely. she can provide them to ukraine conflict. it seems very distant, yet, by chance, one of the many memorials. such as this military museum of korea, it was put in memory of tens of thousands of south korean military and soldiers from different countries who died in the korean war. this situation, when we look at both powers that oppose each other , ukrainian officials are afraid of the same outcome and declare that the korean scenario cannot be allowed to repeat. but what is happening in eastern ukraine looks like this same. i think that when it comes to nuclear weapons, of course, one of the reasons why the west does not directly intervene with the military con

intelligence, however, so far this is only a joint declaration, something like a memorandum that evokes sad memories of budapest in 1994 , concrete legal obligations should appear after ukraine signs agreements with each of the countries. this may become the first legal document that symbolizes that we have there is such an umbrella, this is the first such document, an umbrella of security guarantees, and then ukraine will have documents from each with the state as a security guarantor , the most important result of vilnius at the moment, and this time it is already very concrete the announcement of new packages of military aid, cluster munitions from the united states, new patriot launchers from germany, long-range missiles from france, etc. , in addition , the aviation coalition to teach ukrainian pilots to fly the f16 has finally taken shape in the lithuanian capital , 11 countries of armed aid have agreed . well , if we have today so this is how the circumstances turned out. by the way, you correctly noted all the success, and indeed it was not about nato and not about the goal of vilnius, but about the fir

and you can tell me about the budapest memo, but i wouldn't confuse the description of things now , because there will be a polish memorandum'm talking now. here are the numbers that i'm citing without the nuclear power of ukraine, this is what we're talking about about the 43rd e-e army, if i am not mistaken, which was then formed in russia in the soviet union, which was specifically engaged in nuclear security in the soviet union , but even without this, without this nuclear weapons, we had the potential equal to uh, in terms of size and power, it is the third army in the world as of 91. on the occasion of these years, we were unable to preserve , increase, or improve the existing urban potential, so we dependently received such an unattractive diplomatic dialogue, which in the end, thank god, did not end. a powerful scandal, but i am happy that even this dialogue is diplomatic, so i will call the true scandals to the dialogue, it has become the basis for the final communique to include several interesting positions that we will implement and do. and this is great, first of all, is reforming the public administration sect