cont vo --el terreno que les donaronestan una zona nocida como el caÑon del alacran rodeado decasas humildeson callesipavimentar, pero dicen que todes mejor a pasar hambre yrio o regresar a su pais. take vo / cesar --un rebaÑo de vacas, quedsuelto esta rde en la autopista 16, cerca de sacramento, eando grandes problemas de trfico... --alguaciles, describieron la escena como una de las cosas mincreibles que han presciado...--tom cerca de una hora enpoder acralar en unzona segura a todo el ganado... --y nque nadiresult heri siete vacas murieroatropelladas por

>> senator, i've gone as far as i can go ethically with the canons that restrict me about cases, can't talk about specific cases and i can't get involved in politics. respectfully, i believe i've gone as far as i'm able to go. >> i just want to make clear that i'm looking for the same kind of expression of outrage that i felt as an officer of the court and still an officer of the court because of that attack. as you well know and i cited it yesterday. courts are the least dangerous because they have neither the power of curse nor sword but when he attacks your brethren, he attacks you, the bedrock of our democracy. you as a member of the tenth circuit court of appeals as a so-called judge. he undermines the bedrock of our democracy which is respect for the courts, courts don't have armies. they don't have police forces. all they have is the respect and credibility and you made reference earlier to judges having to take the barbs and insult. my guess is that if a litigant before your court and the president of the united states was a litigant in that case, used that language, you might

federal judge, judge gorsuch is bound by the code of conduct for united states judges, one of the canons of which prohibits a judge from making, quote, public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. unquote. in light of this long-standing, necessary and in judge gorsuch's case, legally mandated practice, i have found it extraordinarily disappointing to hear some of my colleagues try to turn on its head judge gorsuch's admirable efforts to protect his independence. for example, the minority leader has repeatedly castigated judge gorsuch for refusing to take a definitive stand on the legality of the new administration's policies accusing him of, quote, avoiding answers like the playing. unquote. mr. president, for those of us of all political stripes that want a supreme court justice that decides cases on the basis of what the law commands rather than whether the results serves a particular political or policy agenda, be it republican or democrat, conservative or liberal, pro-trump or anti-trump, judge gorsuch's refusal to prejudice his approach to future cases

there are 25 canon along seminary ridge. the union line in this particular area, west of the house was particularly strong. away cannons blazing trying to push in this direction. eventually the flanks are so crumbly, this is the last position to hold. this is the last union position. southerners drive the union army away. the union retreats what is now route 30. the southerners occupy the bridge. they lay out their cannons on the ridge. it is a very commanding ridge. it is a great view of the town. we know this because the battle of gettysburg is the greatest battle of the civil war. people tended to write a lot about it. people came here. there was a historian collecting stories. there were maps made. there is a map of burials made. that shows a union and confederate soldier on this property. that testifies to the severity of the fight and all of the accounts really bolster that. the postwar history of the house is interesting as well. here you have one of numerous houses on the battlefield. civil war battles are usually th

this is conduct not in keeping with the canons of ethics and the oath that a judge speaks. it's good we bring this up. you bring up a good point which is, what happens it? he goes out and does something else and kills somebody, et cetera. i mean yeah if i were the family members of that person, then i would try to sue her. you know. >> jesse: sheds probably liable. juan are the judges now becoming like sanctuary judges? it's like a church. can churches let in illegals and give them safe passage? is that what is happening now. they're 'em bolding them. >> juan: i think that's exactly what's happening. >> jesse: it's not good. >> juan: i agree with kimberly. i think the judge has a responsibility under law to protect the interest of the court and law enforcement officials. i don't think she should be interfering in that way. i don't think that's good. i really disagree with the whole thesis of this, you using the ward whhombre. >> jesse: it's spanglish. >> greg: president trump is goi -- >> juan: president trump is going after people, this guy on a dui. it is a serious crime.

almost be used anywhere to help put things into perspective for what is the voting rights, sort of law canon we think of, explaining the totality of circumstances of why a law is passed. host: you spent26 years with the justice department. when did you become being used as an expert witness? peyton: i firstgot involved as an expert witness in 1980 when the supreme court handed down a decision in acase known as city as mobile versusbolton where the court established that minority plaintiffs challenging a lawas racially discriminatory hadto demonstrate that it was either adopted or maintained for a racially discriminatory purpose, not nearly that it had a racially this crematory effect. effect. since the lawin question in the mobilecase was adopted in 1911, there were not anyparticipants around to use as witnesses, and theonly way to figure out the intent was to hire an historian to do research. i was teaching at the bursting of south alabama site guided the research and used graduate students as research assistants. other social scientists got involved in the case as expert as well. but i was

te está tirando cañón la onda. >> no sé, mi amor. no me había dado cuenta.

federal judge, judge gorsuch is bound by the code of conduct for united states judges, one of the canons of which prohibits a judge from making, quote, public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. unquote. in light of this long-standing, necessary and in judge gorsuch's case, legally mandated practice, i have found it extraordinarily disappointing to hear some of my colleagues try to turn onts head judge gorsuch's admirable efforts to protect his indendence. for example, the minority leader has repeatedly castigated judge gorsuch for refusing to take a definitive stand on the legality of the new administration's policies accusing him of, quote, avoiding answers like the playing. unquote. mr. president, for those of us of all political stripes that want a supreme court justice that decides cases on the basis of what the law commands rather than whether the results serves a particular political or policy agenda, be it republican or democrat, conservative or liberal, pro-trump or anti-trump, judge gorsuch's refusal to prejudice his approach to future cases sho

our top stories: riot police deploy a water canon at turkish protestors in rotterdam after the dutchessing a rally. the political fallout sparks protests in both rotterdam and istanbul. president erdogan wades into the row calling the dutch nazi remnants and fascists. translation: they don't know anything about politics or international diplomacy. they are very nervous, and they are cowards. they are nazi remnants, they are fascists. after abandoning its one child policy, china says 18 million new babies last year is still not enough to prevent the ageing of its population.

. >> story of survival a woman stranded in the grand canon left a clever trail of clues to help in her rescue. >>> we'll have you looking at a tighter stomach, matt is already stretching. you don't want to miss it. it is coming up in the next half-hour. i don't want to put life on hold because of a headache. that's why i use excedrin. it has two pain fighters plus a booster and for some, headache relief starts in just 15 minutes. now moments lost to headaches are moments gained with excedrin. [heartbeat] but when we brought our daughter home, that was it. now i have nicoderm cq. the nicoderm cq patch with unique extended release technology helps prevent your urge to smoke all day. it's the best thing that ever happened to me. every great why needs a great how. >> good morning everyone, it is 6:00 a.m. on this thursday, march 23 here's what's happening. >> expect a lot of drama up on capitol hill today, the house is scheduled to finally vote on the republican plan to replace the affordable care act. but it is republican vote that have the bill on life support. >> you saw the video of th

discussions of the supreme court can get wonky and technical with invocations of precedent, canons of interpretation. what is at stake, however, is not at all abstract. it's real, it's concrete for americans whose lives, health, happiness and freedoms are on the line at the supreme court. closely divided decisions recently have meant the difference between the ability to marry the person you love or not, the ability to have your right to vote protected or not, the ability to make personal choices about your own health care or not. the supreme court matters a great, great deal. it matters for workers who want to protect both their lives and their jobs, for employees who need to be able to seek redress for discrimination, for parents who want their kids to get a fair shake in the education system. it is with all this in mind that i have come to a decision about the current nominee. after careful deliberation, i have concluded that i cannot support judge neil gorsuch's nomination to the supreme court. his nomination will have a cloture vote. he will have to earn 60 votes for confirmation

it's thursday already a, i'm laura garcia-canon. >> and i'm sam brock. >> we're going to need hair gel. you say it's very windy throughout? >> it's going to be windy all day. in some spots we have mist and drizzle so going to see also a little bit of something else to mess up your hair this morning. as we get a look out there in san jose, we have mostly clear visibility but we've had fog in spots and as we look at temperatures now, it's in the mid to upper 50s heading out the door. we have visibility down to two and a half miles in parts of the peninsula but elsewhere it's fairly clear and we don't see much here but it's misty in some parts of the bay area. mike is already watching a crash in san jose. >> the flashing lights are crossing behind me. that's 680 traveling south to 280 north, the transition just a short distance on the scene. flares and a toe truck were on scene. they've just started to move the vehicle. a look at your map into south bay, the west moves well. there's the fog kiir ree wari wg about. the rest of the south bay out of morgan hill move very smoothly. >> sounds

they had all their high-powered rifles, the wilmington naval reserve and they had a small howitzer, canon and these people shut down wilmington their martial law. they were strip searching men and women, and women on every corner. there were a number of black letter carriers who were beaten nearly to death by white mobs and some white women came to their rescue and got the hooligans often and gave them phones. there were a number of white women shelter their black servicemembers and their homes in order to keep them safe. but this was catastrophic for wilmington in so many ways. a lot of these people that were being harassed and shot at, they fled the city, swim the river, went out the creek and to the cemeteries. theyent to ground basically and in three days wilmington was shut down. you can pretty much mark the end of wilmington's ascendancy as a city in north carolina to the date of this to and it has been called the right really was acute because the next thing they did was round up the alderman and at gunpoint at city hall made them all resign and white supremacist down the line and

cont vo --el terreno que les donaronestan una zona nocida como el caÑon del alacran rodeado decasas humildesasar hambre yrio o regresar a su pais. take vo / cesar --un rebaÑo de vacas, quedsuelto esta rde en la autopista 16, cerca de sacramento, eando grandes problemas de trfico... --alguaciles, describieron la escena como una de las cosas mincreibles que han presciado...--tom cerca de una hora enpoder acralar en unzona segura a todo el ganado... --y nque nadiresult heri siete vacas murieroatropelladas por coches en la carretera... cesar --una tortu se conviio en un misterioso animal cuandodescubrieron que tenia cientos de monedas en su cuerpo...lore-- como puedeste animal ter tanddinero en scuerpo...angelaiyon tiene la respuesta. angel --nadie pod iminar que estatortuga marina guardara en su estomago una fortuna. cientos monedas de todos los valorey tamaÑos . 01 26 30 --la tortugae cvirtio en banco, eso si, aunque lento, m seguro, porque ese caparazon no lo rompe nadie. --pero como llego ah ese dineropues al pecer fue el deseo de miles de turistas, porque qui pasaba por el estanque de taila

. >> speaking in there yesterday michael canon agreed it would be worse than doing nothing. >> mike canon is certainly a very learned individual when it comes to health care. >> congressman, are you still a no in >> i am still a no at this time. i am desperately trying to get to yes. i think the president knows that. i told him that personally. and i can say with all the freedom caucus, they are really trying to get to yes. that's why we met for such a long time. it was at times a, not contentious, but i would say very rigorous debate. >> what changed between last night and right now in terms of your support and the freedom caucus? >> i think what changed between last night and today was the fact that the president has made some very good faith and good will gestures to try to move the ball along. and it's certainly having an impact. i've got to run. >> he said if you don't get on board he's going to come after you. are you afraid -- >> welcome to "the lead." i'm jake tapper. we begin with breaking news. it turns out it's a lot easier for republican leaders to seri peel and replace than t

point the first canon of judicial conduct is through your own actions promote affair,ic confidence in impartial, independent judiciary. i do not find that a reason to not engage with that question. i hope that it is something that will be discussed there. >> i have a feeling that in the mock hearings, the so-called murder boards, george gorsuch is for relating the correct answer. any we look at virtually answer that a nominee has given in the last several decades. advance designed to confirmation. how are you ever going to parse that? i think it is an unanswerable question. >> my question relates to the increased politicization of the nominees eight -- nomination process. you expressed sympathy if not outright glee at the possibility of the nuclear option being deployed. and multiple justices being confirmed, tipping the balance of the court. i am wondering if you have any trepidation about what the next age in that process might look like. there is debate has been had about whether or not the long-term filibuster will have merrick garland was unprecedented but that is how democrats h

they want to say he is divisive and a loose canon.want to say he is going to pop up, and he is not up to the job, that he is not presidential, and last night runs counter to what the democrats have been telling us for 40 days. >> it was a speech, and it was a good speech, and we now have to see what happens tomorrow when he, you know, goes on his sort of post-speech lap, which many presidents do. he would not be the first one to do that. we have to see what he does on twitter. we have to see how long this holds. i do think that -- you could hear the laughter in the room, tittering when he said that line about the tiny thinking is behind us. he likes dabbling in controversy and in conflict no matter how big or how small. i don't think it's going to change. it's worked for him. i think he derails himself as much as anything and gives his opponents material to hit him with. we don't know yet what the ratings are or how many people watch this speech, but a lot of people are familiar with his twitter fights and the things that he says. >>

a big problem for prospective mutineers, there is no obvious way in canon law to force a pope out ofcs, it's unclear whether so—called moral suasion alone could realistically lead to another ex—pope in the vatican. joseph shaw chairs the latin mass society of england and wales, and has publicly thrown his weight behind the concerned cardinals. thank you forjoining us. there are catholics and non—catholics who believe this pope is one of the best adverts for religion the world has seen for decades. what are your concerns? my concerns and the concerns of many people is the things he has been saying, they have been interpreted in different ways in different parts of the world and different ways by bishops handing down guidelines for priests. this means that ordinary lay people and priests do not really know what they are supposed to be doing and the job of the pope is to confirm his brethren in the faith so he is not doing what we would expect him to do, which is to explain to us what the teaching of the church ‘s. what the teaching of the church is. is itjust that he lacks clarity or i

persiguieron por esta calle, hasta que estacionÓ su auto en la entrada de esta casa, abriÓ la puerta y los en caÑÓn el informepidieron ayuda mÉdica, pero méndez falleciÓ en el lugar. >> y yo nomÁs pregunte, cuántas balas tenÍa mijo? >> ella me dijo que varias, no me podÍa decir cuantas. en todo el cuerpo. reportera: los oficiales actuaron de forma correcta. >> acepte en parte, bajo del auto, punto. reportera: sin embargo, habÍa un detalle que lo tenÍa preocupado, le comentaron que el cuerpo de su hijo, habÍa terminado a unos 30 pies del auto. >> dijo que el cuerpo, iba a quedar a las 12 del auto. ¿cÓmo es que el cuerpo estÁ retirado? reportera: contrataron al abogado, quien se especializa a casos de abuso de fuerza por la policÍa. lo primero que hizo, fue pedir los vÍdeos de las cÁmaras, para su sorpresa nunca las prendieron. >> eso es algo que para nosotros es muy sospechoso, habÍa tiempo mÁs que suficiente para activarlas. reportera: sin embargo, habÍa otrotestigo silencioso. una cÁmara de un edificio, captÓ el incidente. >> ¿quÉ le dijo que mostraba el vÍdeo? >> cosas horrendas. reportera: se ob

it's thursday already a, i'm laura garcia-canon. >> and i'm sam brock. >> we're going to need hair gel windy throughout? >> it's going to be windy all day. in some spots we have mist and drizzle so going to see also a little bit of something else to mess up your hair this morning. as we get

our top stories: riot police deploy a water canon at turkish protestors in rotterdam after the dutch government stops two turkish ministers addressing a rally. the political fallout sparks protests in both rotterdam and istanbul. president erdogan wades into the row calling the dutch nazi remnants and fascists. translation: they don't know anything about politics or international diplomacy. they are very nervous, and they are cowards. they are nazi remnants, they are fascists. after abandoning its one child policy, china says 18 million new babies last year is still not enough to prevent the ageing of its population. and a special report from brazil and one city's 30 year battle to clear its valley of pollution and give its children a better future. a diplomatic row between the netherlands and turkey has worsened as the dutch government prevented two turkish ministers from addressing a rally in rotterdam. dutch riot police used water cannons to break up hundreds of turkish supporters who'd gathered to demonstrate against the dutch government's decision. earlier the turkish president

riot police in the netherlands have fired water canon at turkish demonstrators in rotterdam after thedressing a rally. the protests came after turkish president recep tayyip erdogan described the dutch as nazi remnants and fascists. the dipomatic row between the netherlands and turkey intensified after dutch police detained the turkish ministerforfamilies. officers said they escorted the minister to the german border. dutch authorities had denied two ministers access to a building in rotterdam where a referendum campaign rally for turkish voters was planned. the un says the world's facing its largest humanitarian crisis since 19115. more than 20 million people face the threat of starvation and famine in four countries in africa and the middle east. over $4 billion are said to be needed byjuly to avert disaster. let's take a look at some of the morning's newspaperfront

. >> i have a candidate, can, canon of ethics that precludes me from getting involved in any way, shape or form in politics. >> dickerson: if true to his word he will be the only one in partisan washington who does. iit is all ahead on "face the nation". good morning and welcome to "face the nation", i am john dickerson. the behind the scenes blame game is in full swing here in washington after the obamacare repeal's failure. the president immediately blamed the democrats. but it was his own party largely a coalition of house conservatives known it is a freedom caucus who refused to support the bill. we begin with arkansas senator tom cotton who is a vocal critic of the bill, senator, welcome. in the washington examiner phil klein writes the headline to his piece, gop cave on obamacare repeal is the biggest broken promise in political history. what is your reaction to that judgment? >> well, john, first to say the president is right that the democrats gave us obamacare and the failure of the bill this week doesn't solve the problems of obamacare, it is continuing to get worse and our he

it has a fixed meaning as madison said, in the fixed meaning of canon, the constitution should have a fixed meaning. and the judges may disagree over what that is. we disagree every once in a while, not as often that is portrayed. they are disagreements over what the law is. that's very important to me. and other thing it does is due process, and interpreting the aw in a way to charge people with notice of because we are judging them for their past conduct. people lose their liberty, their property on the basis of our interpretations of the law and seems to me it should only be fair there are interpretations we can charge them with notice of. similar thing when we come to statutory interpretation, what does the text mean, what could a reasonable reader understand that text to mean. my favorite case when i teach this stuff and talk to my law clerks about it is the fish case. the statute read something like, not going to get it exactly right, but if you destroy email documents or other tangible documents when you know the cops are after you, you go to jail. what does that mean in the co

they never produced canon rate after the civil war. this was between ages 65 and 1873. tredegar became one of the main suppliers of the railroad industry at the time. reducing everything from railroad spikes to cartwheels to railroads themselves. the entire complex band about 23 haters. that included a number of machine shops, or shoe shops. that was some of the big sellers. as the 20th century advanced, railroad hard wheels became one of their primary sellers as well. they had several hammer and steve forages. several boundaries. to store a lot of the excess material that they were waiting to ship out. there was such a demand for what they were make. as the 20th century advanced, they were still making a lot of railroad equipment, wheels, cartwheels, where will spikes. they weren't making cans anymore. and898, they started making diminish for the american government. into world waron i and world war ii. from the beginning of world war i and onward. their primary source of income was government contracts. tredegar never converted to steal. when ever any of the successor

this was not in keeping with the canons of ethics.he is a modern day bonnie and clyde with this guy. i.c.e. should have purchase sued criminal charges against her. there is no free pass when it comes to renegade judges who have sworn an oath to uphold the law. i was a pratt cuter. d.u.i., what if he killed someone. she let this guy out and she wasn't supposed to. lou: i think we'll have to give people recourse so they can hold accountable a judge -- >> who refuses to follow the law. lou: would you be surprised if i told you the judge was a member of the hispanic bar association. >> no, i would not be surprised. it unless my research and it's in keeping with the whole picture. lou: it's interesting where we see these coincidences crop up. >> she is doing this as an hispanic woman. she is doing a disservice to the hispanic community that favors justice and legal immigration and not people thumbing their those and thuments at this country. this woman is putting us in jeopardy. it many conduct unbecome and she should be stripped of her ro

more to the point the first canon of judicial conduct is through your own actions promote the public confidence in affair, impartial, independent judiciary. i do not find that a reason to not engage with that question. i hope that it is something that will be discussed there. >> i have a feeling that in the mock hearings, the so-called murder boards, george gorsuch is for relating the correct answer. theudge gorsuch is relating correct answer. >> how are you ever going to parse that? i think it is an unanswerable question. >> my question relates to the increased politicization of the nomination process. you expressed sympathy if not outright glee at the possibility of the nuclear option being deployed. and multiple justices being confirmed, tipping the balance of the court. i am wondering if you have any trepidation of what the next stage in that process might look like. abouthas been debate whether or not the long-term filibuster will have hearings for merrick garland was unprecedented. what happens if the filibuster is eliminated for the supreme court nominee? is that something tha

comment on those statements that threaten the independence of the federal judiciary because of the canon of conduct for lower court judges. it doesn't apply to supreme court justices. to not comment, or not engage in political activity. first, i don't think that independent, fair, impartial judiciary should be considered a political question. and if you do, then i have some concerns about that. and even more to the point, the first canon of judicial conduct is to -- through your own actions promote the public confidence in a fair, impartial, independent judiciary. i don't find that a reason not to engage in that question at the hearing. i in fact hope it is something that is discussed there. >> i have a feeling in any mock hearings the so-called murder boards, judge gorsuch is as we speak formulating answers to these questions. >> you can virtually look at any answer any supreme court nominee has given in the last several decades and ask, well, was that really sincere, or simply designed to advance confirmation. you know, how are you ever going to parse that. i just think it's an unanswe

. >>> a crew in pittsburgh hung up their hard hats today after finding 21 canon balls at a constructionhe area where they are digging used to be ab arsenal. >>> atm fraud is up 550% across the country. banks are fighting back by having you ditch your card. wells fargo is rolling out new machines that use without the card. customers request an eight-digit code to enter with their personal i.d. code and the pros ask kons of using a cardless am is coming up on "nbc nightly news" with lester holt at 6:30. . >>> chipotle restaurants are cleaning out their menu thanks to revamped tortillas. they were using commercially produced tortillas that contained conditioners ask pr servetives, but now they have been between 2 and 5 ingredients. the only preservatives on its menu are food now for lemon and lime juices it uses for taste. >>> let's talk about the weather. >> dreary damp, overcast. the thunder woke us up this morning. >> that's the next time woer look iing at yucky weather. any of you been to st. louis, they have great barbecue. . they have this area of low pressure. it's going to be headi

and even more to the point, the first canon of judicial conduct is through your own action promote theblic confidence in a fair and impartial independent judiciary. i do find that a reason to not engage with that question at the hearing and i in fact hope that it is something that will be discussed there. >> i have a feeling that in a mock hearing, the so-called motherboards, judge gorsuch is as we speak formulating the correct answer. >> you can look at any nominee is given the last several decades, and asked welcome wasn't really sincere? was at something designed to advance confirmation? how are you going to parse that? i just think it's an unanswerable question speaking let's take one last question. >> my question relates to the increase politicization of the nomination process. earlier today you expressed sympathy at least if not outright glee at the possible of the nuclear option being deployed, and multiple justices being confirmed and tipping the balance of the court. but i'm wondering if you have any trepidation about what the next stage in the process might look like? there's

>> senator, as i explained to you before, i can't get involved in politics and there's judicial canons that prevent me from doing that and i think it would be very imprudent of judges to start commenting on political disputes between themselves or the various branches. >> the reason i asked that question, since this committee began holding hearings, public hearings to supreme court nominations that began in 1960 -- i wasn't here at that time -- but it has never denied a hearing or a vote to a pending nominee ever until chief judge garland. i can express an opinion. i think it was shameful, i think it's severely damaged the reputation of this committee. i think it has severely damaged the reputation of senators who concurred with that. we were anything but the conscience of the nation in that regard and those who proudly held the hand and swore they would uphold the constitution of the united states did not. now, it caused more of a problem because it appears the president outsourced your selection to fire write big money special interest groups. and you may not like that terminology bu

when that would be big news if there weren't other big news shooting into space like a t-shirt canon. the fact is if you want stricter border enforcement, just announcing that idea can do half the job. the blind eye, once turned, is now wide open and staring right back at you. now that illegals know the welcome mat is gone, why take the track? is now is hard to get into america as it is to get into mexico. think about who this really helps and hurts? hurts the ruthless coyotes who victimize the people they transport and helps the folks who are no longer abused. trump just made mexico great again. it's a shame that such success is overshadowed by early-morning tweets but maybe it's a good thing. while the media gets bogged down in words, deeds quietly get done. maybe that's been the strategy all along. kimberly, happy birthday, by the way. >> kimberly: widely rumored to be my birthday. >> greg: you never age. somewhere in an attic there is a painting of you getting old but you stay young. >> kimberly: in your attic. >> greg: there's a lot of things in my attic. do you think this is an

the technology of or the tech of scientology refers to the canon that hubbard created as well as to its correct and pure application. the name of the game in scientology is keep pure the tech of l. ron hubbard. the allegation against miscavige is that he is interpreting the tech. it's a dispute about who gets to say what l. ron hubbard meant. >> every religion gets to deal with these things. who gets to speak for the religion? how do you interrupt the founders intentions? who has the authorities to define the faith? i mean, all of this stuff is for those of us who study religion, very familiar. >> absolutely. >> over the last few years, this argument over who controls scientology anhow to practice it has led to a number of cts and hisms and break-away groups. i've traveled half way around the world to haifa, israel, to visit one of these groups. if you want to start your own scientology mission you first have to pay the church an up-front fee for its trademark. and then you pay for the right to license its material, the auditing, the training manuals, et cetera. and then, you would pay

[imita dirigible] sobrevuela el gran cañón. [imita dirigible] sobrevuela el monte everest. mejor...acer? y como dice el mismísimo muntz, la aventura... -¡la aventura nos aguarda! ¡cuidado, el monte rushmore! ¡dar estribor! ¡tenemos que volar el espíritu aventurero sobre el monte rushmore! ¡resiste, amigo! ¿cómo están mis perritos? [imita ladrido] ¡más, derek! ¡a toda marcha! vamos a subir hasta 8. 000 metros. timón a 18° hacia el sur. "es un hermoso día. vientos desde el este a diez nudos. visibilidad... ilimitada". ¡que todo eso quede asentado en la bitácora! ¡oh, hay algo allá abajo! ¡hay que capturarlo para la ciencia! ¡oh, es un perrito! ¡ay, no hay tiempo! ¡tormenta, relámpagos, granizo! ¿qué estás haciendo? [grita] ¿no sabes que este es un club exclusivo? solo exploradores entran aquí. no cualquier niñito que use un casco y un par de gafas. ¿reúnes los requisitos? ¿eso crees? [balbucea] -yo... -puedes entrar. bienvenido a bordo. ¿qué tienes? ¿no hablas? oye, yo no muerdo. tú y yo somos parte del club. creo que tu globo está allá. ¡sígueme, vamos por él! me llamo ellie. allá es

there is judicial canons that prevent me from doing that and i think would be very imprudent of judges to start commenting on political disputes between themselves or the various branch. >> the reason i ask that question, since this committee began public hearings for supreme court nominations, it began in 1960, i wasn't here at that time, but it has never took a vote to impending omni ever until chief garland. i can express a opinion. i think it is shameful, i think it is severely damaged the reputation of this committee, i think it has severely damaged reputation of senators who concurred with that. we heard anything but the conscience of the nation in that regard, and those who probably hold the hand and swore they would uphold the constitution of the united states did not. it becomes more of a problem because it appears that president outsource your selection to special interest groups and you may not like that terminology, but republican senators have praised the fact that the president had gone into this group and had a list when he was running for office of who we could select f

about 12 feet from the front door is a canon pointed right at the door. you walk out in the morning to get the paper -- there it is. >> let's start over here, please. >> i have always been a fan of george thomas, and i know his relationship with grant not improve as the war went on. by your description he was clearly the hero of both of these battles apparently. certainly at chickamauga, but he took the critical portion of chattanooga too. how would you rate him as a general? him think you could rate high as a general, and you can rate him low as a general. i think it would depend on what you're talking about. he does some marvelous things, but as craig pointed out, the fact that he still has family in virginia hurts him a great deal. it is also fair to note his two biggest defenders, believe it or not, where grant and sherman. those were the two got him in the army in the first place. they said we have got to have this guy, he is a good soldier. we knew him from west point. but thomas tro both of them crazy because he was slow in moving. he was a great d

bu canon? mr. bu canon aye. mr. smith aye. mr. paulson aye. mr. merchant, aye. >> mr. reed aye. mr. kelly, aye. mr. renee say aye. mr. meen aye. >> ms. nome aye. mr. smith of missouri, aye. mr. rice, aye. mr. shh wieker aye. mr. with a lorski aye. mr. occur develop lowe aye. mr. bishop aye. mr. neil, no. mr. leave vin, no. mr. lewis norks. mr. dog get, no. mr. thompson, no. mr. larson, no. mr. larson, no. mr. bloomen hour, no. mr. kind, no. mr. pascrell, no. mr. crowley, no mr. davis, mr. davis, no. mrs. sanchez, no. mr. hig begins, no. mr. sewell, no. mr. del ban nay, no. ms. chew, no. mr. rieker, aye. ms. jenkins? chairman brady? >> aye. >> chairman brady, aye. 23 ayes, 16 nays. >> the motion's agreed to. committee print related to the remunation from certain insuresers. transmitted the house committee on the budget without objection asked the staff authorize to make technical and conforming changes. supplemental additional dece decenting or minority views. the committee print of budget reconciliation relating to repeal of the tanning tax. without objection the measure will be con

>> senator, since i became a judge ten years ago i have a canon of ethics that precludes me from getting involved in any way, shape or form in politics. the reason why judges don't clap at the state of the union and why i can't even attend a political caucus in my home state to register a vote in the equivalent of a primary. >> okay. but i don't think that this is -- you have to state your political views. that's not -- this is about how a supreme court justice who was nominated by the president of the united states, this is like in the constitution. i think you're allowed to talk about what happened to the last guy who was nominated in your position. you're allowed to say something without being -- about getting involved in politics. you can express an opinion on this. >> senator, i appreciate the invitation. but i know the other side has their views of this, and your side has your views of it. that by definition is politics. >> okay. >> and, senator, judges have to stay outside of politics. i think the world of merrick garland. i think he's an outstanding judge. >> okay. i understand.

and there's judicial canons that prevent me from doing that. i think it would be very imprudent of judges to start commenting on political disputes between themselves or the various branches. >> the reason i ask that question, since this committee began holding hearings -- public hearings to the supreme court nominations began in 1960, i wasn't here at that time, but it is never denied a hearing or a vote to a pending nominee. ever. until chief judge garland. i can press an opinion. i think it was shameful. it's severely damaged the reputation of this committee. i think it has severely damaged the reputation of senators who concurred with that. we were anything but the conscience of the nation in that regard. and those who proudly held the hand for this and swore that they would uphold the constitution of the united states did not. now because more of a problem because it appears the president outsourced your nomination to big interest groups. you may not like that terminology but even republican senators have praised the fact that the presiden

you are right, it is a normal thing, i think we had a call in today, the canonization of preet bhararaperhaps pretty apt. >> bret: that is it for the panel. up next, the moment a son really sees his father for t ..es his father for t >> bret: finally, nine-month old reagan caldwell suffered from very poor eyesight due to complications at birth. his father, brandon caldwell was deployed before his young son got glasses to correct his vision. what you are about to see is the moment young reagan really sees his dad for the first time. [laughter] >> bret: that is just awesome. that is it for "special report." fair, balanced, and unafraid. tucker has a big interview on wednesday, >> it is tuesday, march madness, 50 million people bracing for blizzard at this hour and the snow just getting started tripling travel across the country blues live team coverage blue ridge abby: healthcare by the numbers, the cbo releasing analysis on the gop obamacare repeal bill but the trump administration says not so fast blue ridge >> not possible to have that number occur, it is not believable blues abby: br

transition team, newt gingrich will wreck that, plus more in the terror attack of london, come and canon republican leadership struck a deal with members of the freedom caucus on the g.o.p. health care legislation schedule 40 votes tomorrow? chairman mark meadows and congressman dave bratt will join us on this very busy newsnight right here tonight on a "hannity" right here tonight on a "hannity" " with e*trade's powerful trading tools, right at your fingertips, you have access to in-depth analysis, level 2 data, and a team of experienced traders ready to help you if you need it. ♪ ♪ it's like having the power of a trading floor, wherever you are. it's your trade. ♪ ♪ e*trade. ♪ ♪ start trading today at etrade.com ♪ ♪ did you know slow internet can actually hold your business back? say goodbye to slow downloads, slow backups, slow everything. comcast business offers blazing fast and reliable internet that's over 6 times faster than slow internet from the phone company. say hello to internet speeds up to 250 mbps. and add phone and tv for only $34.90 more a month. call today. comcast busi

i actually think you're following a code of conduct for the united states judges canon 3a6, following the american bar association model code of judicial conduct, rule 210. a and b. i appreciate you respecting and living what you say. that's the rule of law and code of conduct of judges. now, i want to get into some specific cases. i guess i'll store with freedom of speech. judge gorsuch, i am going to read some of the notes because i want to make sure i get my points right. i want to apologize again because i may do a little bit of talking. i do believe the first amendment states congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or brid bridging the freedom of speech or the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances. i think the first few words mean something very significant. i think that you do, too. now, clearly this amendment is not meant to limit the ability of the federal government to curtail free speech. it is meant. do you agree the founders intended th

there is a movement to canonize pope eyes the 12th. can you give us a perspective? mark: iowa's get this wherever i go and speak. my short answer to that, i would defer to professor stein knocker . it is totally up on what the research documentation is. i personally have not seen the evidence that he favored not the war criminals. i do believe he was skeptical about things like the norberg trials and a lot of harsh punishment of people who baby who weren't outright butchers but they were kind of complicit. the reason for that is he was very troubled by the way germany was treated in the versailles agreements. he had another war for germans retained a dignity. the catholic church did assist. people also say that a lot of jews were saved in italy. they have the second highest survival rate in europe. the jews in italy. the pope says that that happened because he knew about it. he critics say that there was no evidence that he knew about it. i'll do you can have a different standard in both cases. whether the not the war criminals escape using monasteries or whether je

also, we talked about even number, it canon be dismissed as mostly about oil.'s get the first word news. in the u.s., president donald trump has signed an order restricting people from six muslim majority countries from entering america. it revives a policy overturned last month in the courts. the directive takes effect march 16 and removes iraq from an initial list of countries whose citizens cannot enter the country for 90 days. visa holders and green card holders will not be denied entry. republicans have unveiled legislation to repeal and replace the affordable care act. it promises to phase out key elements of obamacare over the next few years as they try to break through a stalemate between moderate to cash moderates and conservatives. called the american health care act, it includes a refundable, age-based tax credit to help people by insurance and eliminate taxes used to fund the 2010 law. g-20 finance chiefs plan to drop and next -- a pledge to resist protectionism according to a draft communique seen by bloomberg. is aftere in language a meeting where

it has a fixed meaning, as madison said, in the fixed meaning canon of construction, that the constitution should have a fixed meaning. and the judges may disagree over what that is. we disagree once in a while. not as often as some would like to portray. once in a while. but our agreements are not political disagreements, they are disagreements over what the law is. that's very important to me. the other thing it does, it is a due process value. we're interpreting the law in a way that we can charge people with notice of because we're judging them for their past conduct. people lose their liberty. their property. on the basis of our interpretations of the law. it seems to me that it should only be fair that their interpretations we can charge them with notice of. similar thing when we come to statutory interpretation. what does that text mean. what could a reasonable reader understand that text to mean. my favorite case and statutory interpretation when i teach this stuff and teach my law clerks about it is the fish case. there the statute read something like, not going to get it exactly