that prize is cutting carbon dioxide emissions. the way to do that efficiently, economists have been clear for years, is through a carbon pricing program. that should be the core of any green new deal. the green new deal is silent on carbon pricing. that is part of our concern. that it is not going to be an efficient omma effective way -- efficient, effective way to get to the goal. it is available online if you want to read more of the ideas they present on this topic. brian, go ahead. caller: a lot of us would like to do the things you're talking about. the reality of it is we have to get our fiscal house in order. when i was in high school in the 1970's, we were 400 -- we were $450 billion in debt. we are a failure at capitalism. even under trump, we are spending $1.1 trillion a year. more than we have. we cannot chew gum and walk at the same time. you have to get the fiscal house in order. then, we can talk about the things you are talking about. we are not even paying off the juice on the principal on the money we are barring.

in our view, that would be carbon pricing. host: let's go through some of the goals that you proposed. one of those would be to eliminate carbon dependency by illuminating incentives dented -- by eliminating incentive standards. also talk about the paris agreement accord. has this gained traction? white key you think -- why do you think this proposal is the best one? guest: it was proposed by ed markey. one of the cosponsors of the green new deal resolution we are assessing. it failed pretty famously in 2010, the first time they really tried to push, the democrats tried to push hard to pass climate change legislation. it has actually been ample minded in europe -- been implemented in europe and california. a number of other states and jurisdictions around the world have accepted a carbon pricing program of some kind. we would say they have not been ambitious enough. priceed to put a higher on carbon dioxide emissions to reduce the amount of pollution that is put into the air. the concept is not some kind of new untested thing.

we want lower carbon in our future. at the same time, we also recognize that we are going to be growing demands for energy. you have this diversion occurring between meeting the needs of increased energy and the requirements of that, and the fact that people want a lower carbon future. i've said this several times and it is not a new quote from me. we need to keep our eye on the ball. it is not a race that we are in right now to deploy renewables. it is a race to have a lower carbon future. those are two different things. ways at two different looking at the world. the conversation that preceded us here about the evolution of technology and the impact to coal and coal-fired power plants and any fossil fueled power plants is essential to the conversation. we will need fossil fueled power. we will need it, we will demand it, and it is a global issue, but it is not a race to eliminate those facilities. to transform to be able to lower those omissions. peter, what are the big issues top of mind to you right now? peter: the

so into wood where they're stored as carbon the more carbon that we have stored in biomass in the forests the less carbon dioxide we have in the atmosphere contributing climate change. this research can help guide local conservation strategies and influence town planning to mitigate impact on fikile arians. the thousands of years hindus have been performing the last few hundred rights according to specific religious guidelines including burning the day cremation is the traditional method of disposing of the deceased. but with eight point five million hindus dying each year funeral pyres exact a huge environmental. failing over fifty million trees emitting eight million tonnes of carbon dioxide into the air and adding to india's already critical air pollution problem. but here in delhi a team often mind mentally conscious engineers has adapted this is your tradition of. imation to today's needs to protect the environment. thank you can both crematorium is the oldest and most sacred of daley's three hundred seventy five open cremation sites or cox it's also the busiest cremating about seven

the answer, said carbon, is quite simple.for money. >> potentially, yes. >> money, in the form of an insurance policy. >> i think that he wanted out of the marriage and did whatever he needed to do to make sure that that happened. >> and if he got $310,000 in insurance money and got out of the marriage, so much the better? >> yes. >> the evidence against tom foley was circumstantial but compelling. you think he faked that burglary? >> yes. >> and killed his wife? >> yes. >> they never found the murder weapon. what do you think happened to the gun? >> i wish i knew. >> but even without it, in march of 2009, one month after dar foley was gunned down in her shower, state police arrested tom foley and charged him with his wife's murder. >> and i just -- what? why? i was, like, this could not be happening. why do you think i did this? i did not kill my wife. >> to tom and dar's close friends, the pierces, news of tom's arrest was almost as stunning as the news of dar's death. could you conceive of tom either hating his wife so muc

the whole cycle of plant growth and carbon burial depends on the tides.down. so conservationists are now calling for the protection and regeneration of wetlands around the world, to help fight climate change by ensuring that more carbon remains stuck in the mud. victoria gill, bbc news. a new drug for depression, that's about to be approved in the us, claims it can relieve severe depression in hours instead of weeks. johnson and johnson's spravato is a nasal spray containing a chemical called esketamine — and it's been hailed as a major evolution in the treatment of depression. esketamine is a chemical cousin of the anaesthetic and party drug ketamine. it's estimated that some 300 million people around the world sufferfrom depression. and mental health disorders are estimated to cost the global economy some $1 trillion in lost productivity a year. i've been speaking dr steven tucker, an american physician based in singapore, about the safety of this new drug. i asked him if he had any association with johnson and johnson. nine. no relation tojohnson & joh

they recently endorsed the ccl and the energy innovation carbon dividend bill, that is a carbon dividend nationally. the comments -- economist and scientist think this is the best solution we have. and that report said that with high enough carbon fees, we can avert the warming. we also need more housing. i'm here on behalf of the action as well and morton on car transportation infrastructure. we have way too many super communities in california and many of them come into san francisco and also california can take more people from the rest of the country because we have moderate climate and that will help us reduce carbon from a.c. and heating and all of that i think the most important climate bill in california today is more homes in sacramento from senator scott weiner. i hope that san francisco will endorse this bill. i know it is an issue that is going out right now. we can also accelerate our own info housing and protect the bike lanes and transit. a bonus is both of these solutions, both the carbon dividend and more homes and general housing will reduce poverty. california has the

the whole cycle of plant growth and carbon burial depends on the tides.ystem down. so conservationists are now calling for the protection and regeneration of wetlands around the world, to help fight climate change by ensuring that more carbon remains stuck in the mud. the r&b singer r kelly has denied multiple charges of sexual assault in his first tv interview since being indicted last month. chicago prosecutors have charged kelly with ten counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse involving four alleged victims, three of whom were minors at the time. nick bryant reports. # i believe i can fly... r kelly is one of the bestselling musicians of all time. but, last month, he was charged with aggravated sexual abuse against four alleged victims, three of whom were underage girls. you can start a rumour on a guy like me or a celebrityjust like that. today, he went on american television to claim the allegations against him were baseless. is this camera on me? yes, that's all. that's stupid! use your common sense. forget the blogs, forget how you feel about me

no carbon whatsoever, mr. president. so there are absolute solutions, and republicans are going to continue to come to the floor, but we're not going to support something that would bankrupt the country, something that would raise the cost of energy for families, something that would drive people to the point of having to spend money they don't have, having our country borrow money that we don't have, all at a time when you say, what are the cost? there are suggestions and numbers that have been raised. i haven't heard any numbers from the other side of the aisle. so, mr. president, i come to the floor to tell you that republicans have continued to offer solutions and some of these solutions i've been offering for ten years. it took us a while to get these into law. but they are working. they're working, and they have been identified as working. even president obama's former president's secretary of energy ernie moniz said there are two things that would make a big difference. one is the new-age nuclear work that we're d

>> it is the route to controlling carbon. carbonizingabout d -- de-carbonizing heat.x: what are the most prevalent ways that the industry thinks they can move forward quicker and what are the technologies that have not caught up yet? >> well, the lightweighting is a point of discussion from all different sides. to the extent that you can lightweight vehicles. you can reduce carbon emissions along with benefiting their efficiency, and that really took shape in a lot of panels. alix: and what is sort of behind? what kind of techniques and things people are trying to catch up with? >> we are talking about new chemicals used to create composite materials that go into these vehicles and we are talking about new technologies that cut the emissions from heating sources that make it more efficient, therefore more cost effective, and also contribute less carbon to the atmosphere. alix: did you get a sense because i was struck by the oil companies that were talking about new energy platforms, did you get the sense that it is companies trying to shrink their own carbon footprint

. >> the san francisco carbon fund was started in 2009. it's basically legislation that was passed by the board of supervisors and the mayor's office for the city of san francisco. they passed legislation that said okay, 13% of the cost of the city air travel is going to go into a fund and we're going to use the money in that fund to do local projects that are going to mitigate and sequester greenhouse gas emission. the grants that we're giving, they're anywhere from 15,000 to, say, $80,000 for a two year grant. i'm shawn rosenmoss. i'm the development of community partnerships and carbon fund for the san francisco department of environment. we have an advisory committee that meets once or twice a year to talk about, okay, what are we going to fund? because we want to look at things like equity and innovative projects. >> i heard about the carbon fund because i used to work for the department of environment. i'm a school education team. my name is marcus major. i'm a founding member of climate action now. we started in 2011. our main goal

they're at everybody door. >> reporter: the fire department said deadly carbon monoxide gas had been her children's bedrooms and this entire housing complex in columbia, south carolina. >> we could have woke up and the whole community could have been gone. like just wiped out. >> reporter: it all started january 16th with two 911 calls from this building. one caller bleeding from his ears. >> 911, what's your emergency? >> my eyes are fluttering and i'm bleeding. >> reporter: the next day calvin witherspoon jr. and derek roper were found dead. soon more than 400 residents were evacuated. the fire chief said there were no carbon monoxide detectors in the whole complex, but he noted rodent droppings, missing smoke alarms, leaking stoves, damaged ceilings. yet this complex actually passed the housing and urban development inspection a year and a half ago with a grade of 86 out of 100. there's no federal requirement to check for the $20 carbon monoxide detectors but councilmember devine says the city requires them. >> i think it's a gross oversight on behalf of hud. >> reporter: looking

or no carbon economy but that generation that is out there on the streets are the ones who are going to have to finish the job i had my two young daughters with me in paris just to remind me every single day why are we doing this we're doing this for future generations we have d. carbonized in the economy for them we're not doing it fast enough and that's why they are in the streets because we're not doing it fast enough the political compromise in the paris agreement states the objective as being well below two and an aspirational object of a one point five but may i be the first one to say that clause in the paris agreement is now obsolete we have to change that and we have to make sure there were going for one point five and not below two wrested know that secretly in paris out of the deal before because we know many secret things that it was one of the that it was. you know who knew that who knew about and because that's why it is actually mentioned as an aspirational target in in the paris agreement is all of the small island states because they are the most vulnerable you see i

no carbon whatsoever. so there are absolute solutions and republicans are going to continue to come to the floor. but we're not going to support something that would bankrupt the country, something that would raise the cost of energy for families, something that would drive people to the point of having to spend money they don't have, having our country borrow money that we don't have, all at a time when you say what is the cost? their suggestions and the numbers that have been raised -- i haven't heard any numbers from the other side of the aisle. so i come to the floor to tell you republicans have continued to offer solutions and some of these solutions i've been offering for ten years. it took us a while to get these into law, but they are working, they're working and have been identified as working. ven president obama's former president secretary of energy came and testified said two things that will make a big difference, one is the new age nuclear work that we're doing and the other is carbon captur

carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪ >>> we're back here in the bronx. everyone talks about the green new deal, they talk about politics. i want you to imagine there's members down with the green new deal and 100 members of the u.s. senate down for the green new deal and a president down for the green new deal. think bot that world. we're going to exist in that world for a little bit. i want to bring in reana who is the policy director and for those of you that don't know me, she's spent more time thinking about the green new deal than probably anyone. is that true? >> that's probably true. >> you're humble. so we're not talking about political obstacles. zero emissions by 2050. cut in half by 2030, right? those are the goals basically around that? >> we got to start. there's very pragmatic things we could do. instead of the president yelling at the gmc on twiter to create jobs. you could expand the electric vehicle tax credit, link it to domestic manufactur

and also contribute less carbon. i was struck by the oil companies that were there and talking about their new energy platforms. did you get the sense that the companies are trying to shrink their own carbon footprint, are also companies that are producers of power, electricity, oil and gas, can make what they produce cleaner? steph: it's all the things he mentioned, but in addition, they're looking for the best economies and are looking to improve their cost. these type of low carbon technologies are the lowest cost energy generating technologies for most parts of the country. alix: thanks for a much. stefan row of bloomberg nef. one solution on climate changes who climbs for it that ? i said down with lynn good, duke energy ceo, whose operations were affected by three hurricanes last year. i asked her but the longer-term impacts. lynn: we continue to invest in our grade for hardening and resiliency. having a response when a hurricane hits to get power back as quickly as possible. that adaptation is going to be impo

total carbon emissions in 2018. who at the epa was paying attention when california and delaware discussed with carbon pollution is linked to the coastal states august 21 they announced a proposal to replace the clean power plant. this would result in additional carbon pollution between 20 to 61 million short tons per year over the period 2025 to 2035 the equivalent of having between four to 12 million cars to the road. again with anyone at the epa paying any attention when california and delaware discussed with the carbon pollution is doing to coastal states. september 1 11 epa announced a proposed rule to begin monitoring and repair rule for the methane leaks oil and gas facilities. this proposal would result in additional carbon pollution of 380,000 short tons of methane over the period 2019 to 2025, and would create downwind air pollution problems. the equivalent of adding almost 2 million cars to the road for one year. again, was anyone at the epa paying a slightest attention to those states in our last hearing

we've learned that federal inspectors are not required to check for carbon mon detectors, and criticsis costing lives. here's nbc's gabe gutierrez with more. >> reporter: when single mother kentara joson and her three children went to bed, they nev thought men in hazmat suits would wake them up. did you have any idea what was going on? >> no. i was wondering, it's going to be serious, they're at everybody's or. >> reporter: the fire department said deadly carbon monoxide gas had been flowing through her children's bedrooms and this entire housing complex in columbia, south carolina. >> we could have woke up and the whole community could have been gone. like just wiped out. >> reporter: it all started january 16th with two 911 calls from this building. one caller bleeding from his ears. >> 911, what's your emergency? >> my eyes are fluttering and i'm bleeding. ca>> reporter: the next dain witherspoon jr. and derek roper were found dead. soon more than 400 residents werevacuated. the fire chief said there were no carbon monoxide detectors in the whole complex, but he noted rodent droppi

they give off low levels of carbon dioxide.rastically cut down on the amount of energy we use, but how? and mike is live in our student house in loughborough this morning. with a map. yes, good morning. it s the fourth and final week of our student challenge with a giant map of the world and different modes of transport, why? because transport is the biggest contributor to greenhouse gases. and one of the big things we will look at is how we can reduce our transport not just in at is how we can reduce our transport notjust in the uk, but also abroad, more of us are travelling abroad than ever before. it is also about our domestic energy use. the average uk home emits eight tonnes of greenhouse gases every year. so one thing we need to look at is how we can reduce that to have at is how we can reduce that to have afar at is how we can reduce that to have a far greener environmental impact. to answer that, i m joined by dr rosie robison, our sustainable energy expert, from anglia ruskin university. and our six students — helen, w

in our view, that would be carbon pricing.ost: let's go through some of the goals that you proposed. one of those would be to eliminate carbon dependency by illuminating incentives dented -- by eliminating incentive standards. also talk about the paris agreement accord. has this gained traction? white key you think -- why do you think this proposal is the best one? guest: it was proposed by ed markey. one of the cosponsors of the green new deal resolution we are assessing. it failed pretty famously in 2010, the first time they really tried to push, the democrats tried to push hard to pass climate change legislation. it has actually been ample minded in europe -- been implemented in europe and california. a number of other states and jurisdictions around the world have accepted a carbon pricing program of some kind. we would say they have not been ambitious enough. priceed to put a higher on carbon dioxide emissions to reduce the amount of pollution that is put into the air. the concept is not some kind of new untested thing. i

the leading contender: calcium carbonate. >> thesealcium carbonate particles certainly will not have the same chemistry asedhis concentrulfuric acid particles. what we don't know is "how do they actually react?" because it could be that they react even worse. >> reporter: to find out they are planning an atmospheric experiment callescopex. no launch date is set, but orenever it flies, they hope it will answer some int questions. this is an artist renderinof the scopex project. and next to me it's pretty imprsive, kind of big. but of course, relative to the size of the atmosphere isni ule. above me is a high-altitude balloon, and right now it's lifting scopex into the atmosphere. it will rise into the stratosphere, about twice the height of where airliners fly. once scopex is here in the stratosphere, it will release a small amount of calcium carbonate. the onboard propellers mix the experiment into a plume lessth a mile in length. >> this is a tiny scale thing. we're talking about injecting less than a kilolsam of aero so, this in no way alters the climate.a it's simplientific omperi

carbon emissions in 2018. who at epa was paying attention when california and delaware discussed what carbon pollution is doing to coastal states? on august 21st the epa produced a proposal to replace the clean powerplant. this would reduce -- short tons per year over the period 2025- 2035, the equivalent of adding between 4-12 million cars to the road. again was anyone at epa paying attention when california and delaware discussed what pollution is doing to coastal states? on september 11th the epa announced a proposed rule to weaken -- methane leaks at oil and gas facilities. this proposal would result in additional carbon pollution of 380,000 short tons of methane over the period 2019-2025 and would create downwind air pollution problems, the equivalent of adding almost 2 million cars to the road for one year. again was anyone at epa paying slightest attention to those states in our last hearing on the subject? on october 5th the epa denied for petitions by delaware and one by maryland asking it to make a f

it extracts carbon dioxide out of thin air. the pure co2 is then combined with hydrogen to synthesize fuels, gasoline diesel or aviation kerosene. choose your grade. >> that fuel didn't co from the ground. all the carbon that you released thburning it, you took fro atmosphere when you made it. so in the net, there's no carbon emissions and that's a way to help decarbonize. >> reporter: so what if we don't decarbonize and reduce greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to avoid dire consequences? david keith is leading research into a drastic measure to turn down the global thermostat. it's called solar geoengineering. the idea: inject large quantities of sulfur dioxide, or maybe another aerosol, into the stratosphere using high-altitude aircraft. this should lower global temperatures by flecting sut.ight away from our plane it sounds like an idea hatched by a james bond villain, and david keith is keenly aware of that. >> geoengineering seemed like ac bit ofzy idea. but there was a taboo and i think taboos are unh and my view is we

just focus on the carbon tax and you can make a grand coalition.e saying we tried that for 20 years and it hasn't gotten anywhere. what do you think? >> i think we're seeing a formation of a tea party to the left. the tea party to the right that tossed me out ten years ago and went into this decade of disastrous disputation, i think we're at risk of that happening now on the left because last night donald trump was in michigan. there was a crowd that was really cheering for him. >> they were also chanting "aoc sucks" at some point i think. >> what's the difference between last night and tonight? this is the mirror image. this is the flip side. this is the -- this is the -- [ audience reacts ] >> you guys are making fun -- >> what i will say -- >> let me think about that. >> so here's what i think. what i think is that we are committed to policies that make american lives better and we're actually talking about something substantive. we're not calling anyone names. people say tea party of the left, and i find this phrase very interesting, this phras

more land binds carbon and releases oxygen when the area dries out the process is reversed the carbon recombines with oxygen molecules and produces c o two a greenhouse gas. the water levels high here in order to sharply reduce emissions of greenhouse gases which cause serious climate damage through building that's a big plus or is under four dollars but we were also trying to find options for using more land in ways that don't harm the climate and preserve the peace while providing good productivity and a stable regional income to political unity it with young voters and your knowledge . believed. growing more people mass would solve a lot of problems but there is not enough moss seed that's why most of the moss harvest from lower saxony is used to seed new fields forty thousand hectares would be needed to completely replace the peak that's consumed in germany researchers aim to optimize this process then convert and we'd like to see harvests of five six or even up to nine tons of dry matter per year in hector. so that's quite high compared to the productivity normally found in more

why should we care about our carbon footprint.f course with this plane you could just walk there. your average car with just one person in it. just one passenger, one tonne for that passenger, that passengers allowance is actually going to take us the same distance as the plane. a plane in a car emits approximately the same amount of carbon per person per kilometre. but because we're travelling further in planes and doing so more often. they have a larger environmental impact. but how far could you get on other forms of transport? the train. i chose hong kong deliberately. how far do you think an electric car might take us? three people in it then it could take you more than around the world. electrification is a key part of how we are going to meet our sustainability challenges. that goes for travel as well as we were talking earlier about heat in the home. what do we think about the bicycle? very low. so you're basicallyjust talking about the emissions it took to make the bike. you can go as far as you want. basically for no car

. >> the tin candle produces a lot of carbon monoxide. and they are not even using paraffin.ng diesel, because diesel is cheaper than paraffin. and diesel is even worse. so we want to eliminate it, because it is the biggest source of carbon emissions in this ararea. >> kabbyanga knows everyone in the municipality, and everyon knows him. he wants to win them over to his big idea, by 2020, he wants all of kasese to be supplied by renewable energy. hihis motivationon lies in thehe snowowcapped rwenznzori mounta, which are often shrouded in fog. >> we are all pushed into going 100% renewable energy because we wanted to save the glacier. people of the snow'. and if you look at the trend at which the snow is reretreatingns disappearing, it's very high. and technicians have told us, it will disappear by 2030. soso to save it and therefore o save our name, we have decided to go 100% renewable. >> he has photos of the mountain peaks that show how quickly the glacier is melting. 3:12-3:24 >> this is what itit was 1906, this is what it was 1960, this is what it is now. so that's why we

a team of scientists in australia has successfully turned carbon dioxide into solid particles of carbonignificant implications for combating climate change. turning c02 into a solid has been done before, but what is new here is that the scientists at rmit university in melbourne have done it at room temperature. it could also mean that co2 could be reburied safely, removing harmful greenhouse gases from the world's atmosphere. a little earlier i spoke to the lead researcher, dr torben daeneke, in melbourne. he said this is a very important discovery. the significance here is, because we can do it at room temperature, we will... can do it at room temperature, we will. .. the process can do it at room temperature, we will... the process requires a lot less energy. so in the past, people have used processes to convert c02 into solid materials at very high temperatures. this was done at 600, 700 celsius. so we can now do it at room temperature, which might actually finally lead to a viable technology that can be used to actively take c02 out of the air and remove it permanently. and so when

he is confusing carbon with carbon dioxide. carbon is a building block of and carbon dioxide is a gas by burning coil, oil, and other fossil pamphlet on it would know that. so a guy who spent his life dealing with climate and the environment should definitely know that. like moore, president trump has questioned the science of climate change. and his misleading claims contradict the findings of his own administration,s the trump administration. a recent report written by several u.s. government agent says said the global average temperature rose by nearly 2 degrees celsius between 1901 and 2016. the same report said the u.s. is feeling the effects through deadly wildfires, debilitating hurricanes and heatwaves. if nothing is done to combat it, the u.s. could see more and costlier natural disasters. well, the battle for the 2020 democratic presidential campaign isn't just about who will get to take on president trump next year and debate topics like this. it's also what the democratic party stands for. we got a hint, we may have

that means there's a lot of differences so the idea that the united states should be reducing its carbon emissions that we ought to be exploiting clean energy as a way to create jobs are things that people frankly and both sides of the aisle agree on i think like everything else in washington this is gotten wrapped into a broader discussion about. the extremes that might be in this position and how these things are characterized but i think those two fundamental points that we talked about reducing carbon emissions creating jobs are bipartisan they should be bipartisan ideas. so chris you worked for president obama who campaigned i would say as a centrist as a moderate some people might not think that he actually conducted his presidency that way but he said there's no red state america there's no blue state america and gave that electric electrifying speech of the two thousand and four democratic national convention saying all those things but what we're saying seeing right now is the democratic party sort of lurching to the left so i want to ask you again about the green new deal as it

deal is a label and it means different things to different people fundamentally it's about reducing carbon emissions and trying to clean create more jobs. out of clean energy really look at the messaging here is really what it's about this is something that's been demagogued by people in the republican party but it's really trying to move us to a carbon free future which is really no different than what mike bloomberg announced this week. when he decided not to run for president and so this idea of using clean energy green jobs as a stimulus the economy is frankly what president obama did in two thousand and nine when he passed the stimulus package and so yes there's a lot of packaging there's a lot of message there's a lot of noise on this is a christian let me ask you let me ask about that is the messaging working for the democratic party i mean just as it was being rolled out nancy pelosi speaker of the house she seemed to be very dismissive of it and in the green new deal there were a lot of elements that seem to have a lot more to do with income redistribution and sort of a socialist

e of the aims of the business is to have a lower carbon footprint. we try to have as few deliveries as possible and as many products produced locally as possiblble instead d of transportining and buying things ouout of season.n. if you buy ts out of season, it has to be transported a longer way. we hope to think so, as well, that people are making a choice while visititing us. even thouough thy don't have to take a big stand, but still, though, they can make a difference as well. >> when it comes to addressing environmental challenges, new swedish technologies are making a difference, not only in sweden but around the world. in many parts s of the world,d,e water is hard to come by. over 1.1 billioion people lack access to safe drinkining water, a and that't's 12% of the world'ss population. >> solvatten!! >> technology can be a solutiti. solvatatten, or susun water, i s a new water purifier invented by swedish artist and micrcrobiologist petra wadadstr. >> the story begin in australia, where there was a lot of sun, and we were there. and now it's ne