and a low—carbon heating system.omething else, so that the heat you're using is low—carbon. probably your best option, we thought, was a heat pump, which would use electricity. if they did everything, how much would it cost? we estimate somewhere between £23,000-£30,000 for everything we talked about. could somebodyjust go up to that money tree up there? that is the key problem. making our homes low—carbon is expensive and most of us either can't or won't pay for it. the behaviour change report says more financial incentives should be available. even if we could all afford it, going electric won't get us to net zero, because 47% of our electricity still comes from fossil fuels. to get to net zero, all of it will need to be low—carbon. and to meet the extra demand from electrifying heating and transport, we'll need to quadruple our supply of clean energy. remember those bug burgers i made earlier? well, it's almost the end of the experiment, so i've brought them up to the paviers for a special barbecue, along with a r

what our carbon neutral pathway is. scope two emissions which are zero out of the public utility commission but scope one is challenging. there's a central plant by natural gas and once we environment ability to electrify this which we think will fall under the new decarbonization code that has been draftedly likely this commission and the department of environment, we'll reduce 80% emissions on campus from that one change. so big changes afoot for our airport. we're work on a variety of strategies and i'll cover that on the next slide but i want to show you that this looks complicated but we have a step-wise approach to carbon neutrality. but in terms of scale, when you look at the airport's total impact, relative to our full scope of emissions, so if you include scope 3, what comes from our tenant's operations, it grosgrows dramatically. so that's a fraction so when you look at cities and counties themselves and the businesses that operate are the largest driver of your emissions. it's a thumbprint when we look at the

a carbon tax would be great. >> and, yeah -- they're in favor of a carbon tax. have republican secretarsver of previous administrations, from james baker to george shultz to hank paulson -v are you in of a carbon tax as a conservative approach to addressing climate change? >> just carefuw the oil industry h couched the carbon tax...ideas. that would be great.th >> eve they're in favor of it, i'm sure you would -- i'm sure you would probably quble with some of the details. doesn't it demonstrate... >> oh, it'd be great. >> ...a chbege in attitude? >> the word "tax" is a fabulous word,ru but justinau, prime minster of canada, got in huge trouble for accidently saying... >> saying the word "taxes." r so how about the word "fee"? it's a three-letrd. we'll have a carbon fee. so, when you produce carb-- en your business produces carbon, the cost oyour product goes up a little bit. this would discourage the production of -- p the reckleductio of carbon or methane -- carbon dioxider methane -- and it would encourage innovation and conservationen and effi. and this is th

is in favor of a carbon tax. this has been a referendum on trudeau. it is to see if voters are tired of these embarrassments and broken promises. so far, it looks like they are seeking to punish him halfway. he is going to have to cooperate with someone. results.arly when want to get ahead of ourselves. >> thank you very much. still ahead on bloomberg facing trouble with a whistleblower, alleging unethical accounting practices. we will the latest from mumbai. >> facing trouble with bringingt for an annual decline. this is bloomberg. ♪ >> i just want to bring you some breaking lines here. this is from the canadian election. trudeau's liberals are projected to win this election. we are not sure of the numbers breakdown. we are waiting to get the details of that. rishaad: more of that for you and what is happening with the canadian dollar. it is just off the highs of the day. one canadian dollar. about something. there have been discussions about what is going on. >> we are seeing earnings here. it was a pretty mixe

face for paying carbon emissions shareholders could pay the price. billion a year by 2025 to offset carbon emissions for all global economy flights but warns the actual costco be up to ten times higher joining us now is the analyst behind the numbers, citi manage director great to have you with us. >> thank you >> this is really a thing. i have heard of it but i didn't think this was something that would, you know, spark a research report from a major investment bank. >> it's funny. we approached it with the same skepticism that you just mentioned. i think you described the theme beautifully. the fact is there are three things to concerned about. this will affect three runningrf society. consumer hit, corporate hit and government it will affect 40% of airline profits. >> have the airlines in terms of the stock prices, have they factored that cost in? >> it's funny you say that the global airline space hasn't considered this. to the degree that i think that will be hitting them in the subsequent years yes they all talk about being carbon neutral when

however, i want this to be a price on carbon not a tax on carbon. my proposal is that all of that toey would be remitted taxpayers. it would be revenue neutral to the government. in that sense, it would not be a tax simply a price. the most common way to remitted to the taxpayers that has been rolesed is simply to give tax relief which is paid by everybody that is working and i top so itat that the would be more relief for lower income taxpayers to the extent you need the cooperation of congress, i would probably appeal to democrats. relativelyle for short money to repeal the gas tax. that might appeal to a publicans -- republicans. not be a painful thing to do in terms of its importance to the world at large. one idea that i have had that i have not seen others put forward is for industrialized countries like ourselves and or china to buy up sovereign debts of countries who have a great deal of forest particularly rain forest which is good for the atmosphere. more trees is a good thing. by up the sovereign debt on the condition that the rain forest

we start our journey in a city moving on from carbon. few places are as eager as copenhagen to get power from wind and even in this weather from sun. no way this plane came into a ditch cars that parks. klaus bonded as director of the danish cyclists federation and a former mayor of the city. he's leading its push to be the 1st carbon neutral capital by $22.00 and. i do believe that there is a strong political consensus in denmark that we need to act it's pretty cold right now but we have an extremely hot shot it didn't rain for 20 half months here. but nothing this is why is there something going on. and i think we have to realize that something is going to. copenhagen has been breaking all records in traditional ways to clean air. according to this beta 1631 box of cross this bridge this morning alone in the past year it's been 3519062 it's extraordinary but the problem is no matter how much we ride them or how much we recycle the matter how fast communities transition to renewables it's probably not going to be faster now because gove

we start our journey in a city moving on from carbon. few places are as eager as copenhagen to get power from wind and even in this weather from sun. know where this plane came into ditch cars that parks. klaus bonded as director of the danish cyclists federation and a former mayor of the city. he's leading its push to be the 1st carbon neutral capital by 2020. i do believe that there is a strong political consensus in denmark that we need to act it's pretty cold right now but we had an extremely hot shot it didn't rain for 2 and half months here. but then i think this is why is there something going on. and i think we have to realise that something is going to. copenhagen has been breaking all records in traditional ways to clean air. that according to the speaker's 1631 box of cross this bridge this morning alone in the past year it's been 3519062 it's extraordinary but the problem is no matter how much we ride them or how much we recycle the matter how fast communities transition to renewables it's probably not going to be faster now

meet the low carbon cow.ting animal and the least polluting animal is about a0%. our hope is to keep breeding using these less polluting animals. so you're trying to breed a kind of race of super low carbon cows. ultimately, that's the goal. that's the goal? yes. but the report warns we will only be willing to make these changes with incentives from government, and by pushing up the prices of high carbon products and activities. chris stark, the head of the committee on climate change, the body that commissioned the behaviour change report, says the government needs to raise its game. they have a plan of sorts, but not nearly at the level of ambition that would be required. every bit of policy now needs to be refreshed. the government told the bbc today it is going further and faster on cutting carbon than any other nation. but the report's recommendation would mean huge changes for us all. the protestors here would welcome that — but will the public? justin rowlatt, bbc news, london. you can see more you can

however, i want this to be a price on carbon not a tax on carbon. so my proposal is that all of that money would be remitted to taxpayers so it would be revenue neutral to the government. in that sense it would not be a tax, simply a price. the most common way to remit it to the taxpayers, it's been proposed, is simply to give payroll tax relief which is paid by everybody that's working, and i propose that be put on a gradient so it's more relief for lower income taxpayers. to the extent you need cooperation of congress i would appeal to democrats, you would be able for relatively short money to repeal the gas tax and diesel tax. that might appeal to republicans. but it would not be a terribly painful thing to do in terms ever its importance to the world at large. one idea that i've had that i haven't seen others put forward is for industrialized countries like ourselves and/or china to buy up sovereign debt of countries that have a great deal of forests, particularly rain forest, which is very, very good for the atmosphere. more trees is a very goo

hands that draw in air and bind carbon molecules of the filters. the carbon free air is released back into the atmosphere the c o 2 is super heated and collect this gas i like to call it low tech not high tech and it's actually very simple the challenging part is making it work and making it cheap. in just 2 years they've opened the plants in switzerland icelandic italy. they believe they could remove 10 percent of the carbon the i.p.c.c. wants cuts. their 1st target is one percent by 2025. it's like 300000000 tons of c o 2 and that we're require a quarter 1000000 machines. but in this developmental stage removing just one tonne of carbon costs at an economical $600.00 us dollars we are confident that and the next 2 to 3 years we will have our cost and the ranch off 2 to $300.00 per tonne and the mid to long term and that's for us 2025 to 2030 and we see cost as $100.00 as feasible. so the big question is what do you do with all this captured c o 2 well fortunately in this case there's a greenhouse just 300 meters away so half of the carbon sucked

who said is a city built on carbon. mining fossil fuels is as much a part of texan culture as raising cattle or boots good. but these days big energy is trying to sidestep demands to cut production. its response is a much touted technology to cut the carbon footprint. for today we're heading out to texas is the biggest pal plant it's a pioneer of what the industry likes to call playing call. this is patron no. it's a coal fired generation with a $1000000000.00 absorption to our unit a that last that after the coal is burned be emissions of pumped through it and solvent collects much of the c o 2 before it hits the atmosphere. it's early days to get excited. the tower captures carbon from just one of the complexes 10 generating units. what's more it doesn't actually reduce emissions over all. the captured carbon is pumped in liquid form enjoy the oil field. they put c o 2 in an oil field and you get more oil out right as company spokesman david knox explains it breaks up stubborn deposits so they can extract more oil but

why is that causing such a big increase in carbon? bill: the -- when you clear land, you're taking in the carbon that's stored say in the trees or plants and you're releasing all of that like burning the land, say in indonesia for palm oil plantations. ♪ david: now a large part of the carbon is caused by the electricity grid which is about 25% or so. bill: exactly. david: so 24% it comes from agriculture and forestry. why is that causing such a big increase in carbon? bill: the -- when you clear land, you're taking in the carbon that's stored say in the trees or plants and you're releasing all of that like burning the land, say in indonesia for palm oil plantations. another thing is cows and other grass-eating species has a digestion system that emits methane and methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas. and so cows alone account for about 6% of global emissions. and we need to change -- david: cows? bill: yeah, just cows alone. david: how are we going to do that? bill: well, of all the categories, the one that has gone better than i

meet the low carbon cow.t polluting animal is about a0%. our hope is to keep breeding using these less polluting animals. so you're trying to breed a kind of race of super low carbon cows. ultimately, that's the goal. that's the goal? yes. but the report warns we will only be willing to make these changes with incentives from government, and by pushing up the prices of high carbon products and activities. chris stark, the head of the committee on climate change, the body that commissioned the behaviour change report, says the government needs to raise its game. they have a plan of sorts, but not nearly at the level of ambition that would be required. every bit of policy now needs to be refreshed. the government told the bbc today it is going further and faster on cutting carbon than any other nation. but the report's recommendation would mean huge changes for us all. the protestors here would welcome that but will the public? justin rowlatt, bbc news, london. and you can see more on this story on panorama: cl

who said is a city built on carbon. mining fossil fuels is as much a part of texan culture as raising cattle or boot scootin. but these days big energy is trying to sidestep demands to cut production. its response is a much touted technology to cut the carbon footprint. for today we're heading out to texas is the biggest pal plant it's a pioneer of what the industry likes to call playing call. this is paid for no. it's a coal fired generation with a $1000000000.00 absorption into our unit that last after the coal is fearne be a missions of pumps through it and solvent collects much of the c o 2 before it hits the atmosphere. it's early days to get excited. the tower captures carbon from just one of the complexes 10 generating units. what's more it doesn't actually reduce emissions over all. the captured carbon is pumped in liquid form enjoy the oil field. they put c o 2 in the oil field and you get more oil out right as company spokesman david knox explains it breaks up stubborn deposits so they can extract more oil fie

a carbon sink.there's discussion around, can you pay farmers and ranchers to sequester carbon, and not only go to neutral emissions but theoretically create a carbon sink, and agriculture could be paid for offsetting emissions from all of us driving around, riding lawn mowers on our massive suburban lawns and all that. you would basically flip the table around, from blaming agriculture for contributions to emissions, and contribute in the climate change like all of us are, to being actually a very big part of the solution. i think that's kind of where it is turning, but it's not really hit the mainstream. i don't know if you see a turning in terms of how farmers are thinking about this. is it an opportunity like you said, to create new revenue, or are we just at the beginning of thinking of it in those terms? because right now they aren't paid for that. >> at the direction of the farm bureau, the american farm bureau federation, the commodity groups formed the former-rancher alliance that represent

they always have. >> have you heard anyone talking about storing carbon or being paid for carbon sequestration? is that a conversation that's happening right now? >> you know -- >> not really. not the issues that -- >> this is good. >> -- that the ag community is concerned about. >> i want him to be invited back. let's come in five years from now and ask that same question, i guarantee you they will be talking about it. >> go ahead. >> i was going to say, part of that challenge, though, is because it is a commodity crop is how does the rest of the world play in this, and does it go on the back end, or do we just add to the trillions and trillions we already have in federal debt to go deeper into debt to be able to do that? or does brazil and south america and does europe, do they buy into this deal where they will do the same type of requirements from their farmers and ranchers to where we don't become competitively disadvantaged? that's what my folks in my district are always worried about is you put regulations, you put things on top of us that we have to compete in a global market, that's n

so with respect to carbon dioxide emissions, the trump rule would reduce carbon dioxide emissions, carbonpollution emissions by only 2.7% of what the obama administration would have done, 2.7% of what the rule that they're replacing would have done. with respect to sulfur dioxide, the trump plan reduces sulfur dioxide emissions by only 1.9% of what the obama administration rule would have done. and when it comes to ny nitrus oxide, the trump proposal, the trump plan reduces nitrus oxide by only 2.5% compared to what the obama provisions would have done. and if you take all of these together, you can see it's a really anemic -- it's really an anemic proposal that takes us way, way backwards compared to where we were. that's why i support senator cardin's efforts here on the floor with a vote tomorrow to say no, to say no to the trump administration's efforts to roll back the progress on clean air, to roll back the progress on clean water because a lot of that air pollution settles in places like the chesapeake bay, and to roll back progress on climate change which we know is hitting our co

carbon. and oxygen. that's as much science as i'll get with you right now. why is that important? you just heard details about carbon dioxide and what that does to earth's climate and the impacts of that on everything living and things not living. and why humans should care and the economics. so let's get to that. who cares about these tiny plants in the ocean. phytoplankton conduct 50% of earth's primary production with their biomass turning over in the ocean every two to six days. how do you gauge that change and has that kind of impact on the global carbon cycle? ice challenging to observe but it's possible. phytoplankton mitigate one-third of human carbon dioxide emissions each year. you should start to see why these organisms are important in understanding our earth's system. the economics of it, i did a simple google search of u.n. reports and came up with tidbits referenced in recent u.n. reports. you'll hear more about this in a moment. but fisheries support about 12% of the world's l

think renewable energy, low carbon technology. we make investments across this in the public and private market portfolio. it is a central part of climate risk strategy to provide capital for those opportunities that are growth opportunities but also are helping with the energy transition underway. two is engage in efforts as we previously discussed. we are engaging with companies directly to understand if and how they are aligning the business model and strategy with transition to low carbon economy to inform or investment decisions going forward. third, we do have divestment as part of our strategy where we have determined that companies have a high unmitigated risk from climate change that can't be addressed through engagement, we will restrict investment in them. as we discussed earlier we divested from the thermal coal sector by and large. i will provide an update in a minute on the target de investment in oil and gas. fourth is advocacy given the climate risk has the systematic component i mentioned. we are trying to support

we have licensed carbon emissions data for a ca carbon footprint. as of june 30 this year the last time we ran the data, the public equity portfolio had a weighted average carbon intensity, which is the most relevant metric, that was 22% lower than the policy benchmark. the chart on the left shows this breakdown by sector and how that emissions reduction is allocated and attributed to the sector allocations and stock selection. as you can see in the final two rows, a lot of the reduced carbon footprint is due to the portfolio being underway in the material sector as well as energy sector, which are the three most carbon intensive sectors in the economy. over the last 10 years if we look back further, the public equity portfolio, the carbon footprint declined 40% over the last 10 years versus 35% of the benchmark. we are out pacing in terms of the carbon footprint reduction. in the past year we can see the billion dollars in low carbon strategies in the public equity port folio was effective in lowering the public equity carbon foot print by about 7%

the captured carbon is pumped in liquid form enjoy the oil field. they put c o 2 in the oil fields and then you get more oil right as company spokesman david knox explains it breaks up stuff and deposits so they can extract more oil the c o 2 has a tendency it bonds with oil and when it launched it makes it slippery and when it's slippery or it comes off of the rock that last bit of oil in there but if you capturing c o 2 but to get more oil to actually increasing the amount of c o 2 overall it was if we were increasing the amount of oil that's being used but we don't actually have any impact on the amount of oil it's been used the oil is the same amount being used we're just increasing the domestic production and we don't have to import as much oil from foreign countries. the industry is looking at other options like superheating call that still produces and they shouldn't without. well still since. this unit the small one in canada are the only ones in cold blood plants using carbon capture the personally. there is such a thing as clean coal but i

the captured carbon is pumped in liquid form enjoy the oil field. they put c o 2 in the oil field and then you get more oil right as company spokesman david knox explains it breaks up stuff and deposits so they can extract more oil the c o 2 has a tendency it bonds with oil and when it launched it makes it slippery and when it's slippery or it comes off of the rock that last bit of oil in there but if you capturing c o 2 but to get more oil than to actually increasing the amount of c o 2 overall it was if we were increasing the amount of oil that's being used but we don't actually have any impact on the amount of oil it's been used the oil is the same amount being used we're just increasing the domestic production and we don't have to import as much oil from foreign countries. the industry is looking at other options like super heating call that still produces nations without. well still since. this unit the smaller one in canada are the only ones that coal fired plants using carbon capture the personally. there is such a thing as clean coal but it

one of things that artists is low carbon.t doesn't burn a lot of carbon to put on a play with your friends. to get a bunch of kids together and paint a mural. as we head into this rocky future there are things that we have to contract. the fact that we have turned shopping into our main communal activity is a problem. where all of the research shows as it actually makes them happy is not that. what makes people happy is time with friends. in community time in nature. art. we need to expose the idea that this is elite and we also need to celebrate it as low carbon work. so i'm just so excited because i feel like we have a crisis of imagination that's one of the biggest problems we are up against. we've been failed by hollywood they keep showing us visions of the future we are just ourselves only worse. the idea that artists could step into this and help us imagine our way out of this is so exciting. i want to thank you so much for your courage and i love that this movement is intergenerational as well if you look at the cultur

a decade or more that enough of that carbon dioxide will be sucked out of the atmosphere that we will be able to begin to mitigate the rising c o 2 levels because of the burning of fossil fuels jury admit it's a bold initiative which could take years to implement if the gene manipulation is successful but for her it's personal and there is an emergency with this project and for me you know i'm 64 years old ok i've had put in stands for 16 years that's a long time you while i feel good i have to do this you know we have to stay so on point to get it done right i have a single goal you have to keep your eye on that go joy in shorey a warrior in a laboratory fighting for planet earth rob reynolds al-jazeera la jolla california . you're on jury that is one of the many people around the world trying to come up with solutions to protect our planet and we'd like to hear your stories of innovation and action just get in touch using the hash tag a.j. planet s.o.s. and that's it for this series of planet s.o.s. all part of al-jazeera is commitment in boosting our coverage of this crucial and im

it says, over the coming decades, everything we do has to become either zero carbon or much lower carbonnsumers need much more information about the environmental impact of the things they do and buy. it talked about mandatory carbon impact labelling for food. buy. it talked about mandatory carbon impact labelling forfood. it says we need more subsidies to encourage us says we need more subsidies to encourage us to do things like insulate our homes, take public transport, may be to buy an electric car, but it also says over time the price of carbon intensive products or activities will have to rise, so expect things like fossil fuels, beef, flying to get more expensive. let's take a look at some of today's other news. gabriella zaghari ratcliffe, the five—year—old daughter of a british iranian woman who's beenjailed in iran, appeared at a press conference today with her father, richard ratcliffe, after returning to the uk. gabriella had been living with her grandparents in tehran after her mother, nazanin, was arrested three years ago on spying charges that she strongly denies. her famil

for one third of america's carbon output. scientists now tell us to avoid the most devastating effects of climate change the world needs to be carbon neutral by mid century. at the moment we're not on track even remotely to meet that target we must act which requires diverse coalitions of support. what distinguished my proposal is not only its scale, but its ability to unite the american environmental movement, labor movement and large automakers. listen to who is supporting the proposal. sierra club, council and league much voters-- workers like auto workers and electrical workers and afl-cio and car manufacturers like ford and general motors. when have we ever seen the car manufacturers and the unions and the environmentalists agree on a major proposal that will stop carbons from poisoning our atmosphere? well, here it is. how would this plan work? first it would provide a large discount on an american made vehicle when drivers trade in gas powered car. second, it would provide grants to states and cities to build charging

now gulf states make up 3 of the top 4 at mit is when carbon emissions are assessed on a captive basis so the total emissions divided up by the number of people in the country but the a.m.a. of qatar is promising change no 100 today you will hear the phenomenon of climate change is undoubtedly one of the serious challenges of our time causing many problems including economic environmental and social problems all cease must fulfill their responsibilities and honor their commitments under international agreements and the state of qatar has assumed its responsibilities as an active aurthur in the international community to confront climate change bill had mari is the director of the climate change department qatar's environment ministry and he joins me from new york mr o'mara thank you very much for being here what exactly is qatar doing to on its commitments. cutter's commitment is in line with the vision of 2030 and the believe and understanding of for the government that climate change is a very important issue and it's a cross border phenomena that needs to have all its faults and sol

is the ceo of energy energy announcing net zero carbon.ow else they are preparing for climate change. helping farmers deal with threats imposed by climate change. we will speak with the ceo about that and how the company's position itself as the trade war takes its toll on global agriculture. amanda: justin trudeau was elected to a second term as prime minister, but he will preside over a minority government. the liberal party lost its parliamentary majority and the popular vote. >> to my fellow canadians, it has been the greatest honor of my life to serve you for these past four years, and tonight you are is sending us back to work for you. what does the new minority government mean for the future of u.s. relations, we are joined by a former ambassador to canada and frank mckenna. thank you for being with us. amanda: ambassador mckenna, we obviously are going the other direction, you dealt with a different scenario, but you have done many things in this country in public life. what is different about a minority government when it comes to

there's a natural carbon sink drawing in c o 2 and story directly in the soil it's with c o 2 levels so high they just can't take it all in but now scientists in california trying to change that they're using gene everything technology to try to give the plants around us a turbo boost reynolds. for planet earth and for dr joe and chore e it's a race against time jury is a multiple award winning plant biologist at the salt institute in california she's also been battling parkinson's disease for more than a decade her old idea is to genetically modify existing crop plants to reduce the planet warming chemical carbon dioxide we knew that plants really were good at sucking up c o 2 from the air they've had 450000000 years or more. evolution and that makes the plant really efficient plants can get that c o 2 out of the atmosphere and they can concentrate and then they use it think back to your school science lessons photosynthesis is the process by which plants convert sunlight water and c o 2 into stems leaves and sea plants expel oxygen as a byproduct but while forests are shrinking glo

and as a sense carbon dioxide causes our planet to warm stay with us for the scientists working to see the challenge of natural process to capture carbon editing the genes of clones so they can draw in most c o 2 and store it deep underground. welcome to planet s.o.s. in iceland right now or by a glacial lagoon and that new york national park which is your desk a world heritage site later will be in the capital reykjavik where the assembly is taking place it's the biggest summits taken is important not just because of what's going on geopolitically in the region but also because of climate change issues which are striking a very hot. of life hit in the north temperatures they soared in the arctic this summer and that's not a novelty it's becoming a disconcerting trend greenland's ice sheet lost a staggering 12 and a half 1000000000 tons of ice in one day more than any other day since records began in 1950 and is when does get warmer and drier the loss will only get worse tick sea ice dropped to the 2nd lowest amount on rec old this year and this is something you don't see very often li

>> that is the last plan, that's the carbon tax, the carbon tax is on training wheels, it's to get you ready for the full thing and they dress it up and painted green but it's an added tax. there he spent all the money there to get from the carbon tax. elizabeth warren and all the democrats are going to carbon tax, they spent the money and they're gonna do that and they're gonna spend all that money and that money so you spent six of her ways. yet lots of taxes are claiming their spending more than once which them to come up with new taxes and that's with the carbon tax works in. david: there's not much room for the private sector. thank you very much. we appreciate it. the longer strike against general motors is now officially over. we get all the details on what this means for workers in the company coming up. next, investigating the investigators, bill barr turning the review of the russia probe into a full-fledged criminal investigation. what does it mean we will ask former federal prosecutor doug burns. he is joining us next. >> i think you see things nobody would believe, this wa

prime minister there's a carbon budget.artbreaking for me to look y at you today and know you could have done so much more in the last four years. please get a majority. >> we need a a strong civil government to fight them and to make sure that we are moving a rude on protecting theov future generation from the impacts of climate change. >> at your plan is a target for failure. benur you hang onto a target of 30% by 2030 it better get to double that target or you'll never get the carbon by 2025. >> mr. blanchet. >> you claim to have done a lott by canada's the worst in the g20 per-capita. i have two questions. first we'll create the demand of the prime minster that a typical review and environmental issues would have precedence over canada's review and the second question do promise after the judgment them british columbia to not ever try to run a pipeline through quÉbec ever? >> after 10 years of mr. harper's failures too get things through because he did not understand yet to work with indigenous peoples coming up to work

we need ways to make fuel better zero carbon. david: do heads of state roll their eyes and say can i have a selfie with you? or do they do anything less to mark what are you trying to get them to do? bill: in the paris climate conference, one of the things that was missing was the focus on r&d. we want that to be an issue that gets discussed. modi got to pick that name, and the commitment of 30 governments to double their energy r&d was a significant milestone that came out of the conference. in order to get that commitment, i had to make a commitment that there would be things out of those labs to get them into the marketplace. there has been some progress. climate is complicated enough. peoplet a broad set of to understand the complexity and in terms of r&d that needs to be done, unless the u.s. is deeply engaged, it is unlikely to happen. so much of the world capacity to do that innovation is here in the united states. david: united states pulled out more or less of the paris accord , is that of concern to you, and do you thin

. >> the san francisco carbon fund was started in 2009.sically legislation that was passed by the board of supervisors and the mayor's office for the city of san francisco. they passed legislation that said okay, 13% of the cost of the city air travel is going to go into a fund and we're going to use the money in that fund to do local projects that are going to mitigate and sequester greenhouse gas emission. the grants that we're giving, they're anywhere from 15,000 to, say, $80,000 for a two year grant. i'm shawn rosenmoss. i'm the development of community partnerships and carbon fund for the san francisco department of environment. we have an advisory committee that meets once or twice a year to talk about, okay, what are we going to fund? because we want to look at things like equity and innovative projects. >> i heard about the carbon fund because i used to work for the department of environment. i'm a school education team. my name is marcus major. i'm a founding member of climate action now. we started in 2011. our main goal it to re

we want greener carbon emissions. when people want to use the services, they get the cars of the roads, we reduce congestion, pollution and a good bus service can make all the difference to your job. to your life, to your ability to get to the doctor. also, your ability to stay there and start a family. we are no exhilarating the program. [applause] to be truthful, i'm not sure of the exact technical details. we are bringing adored by eight years. that means it is not just superfast but incredibly fast, speed of light broadband spurting into every home in the country. it is bringing people together, giving people opportunities. that is better connectivity and better transports unite the country. you increase the productivity of the whole u.k. economy. if you have good wi-fi and good broadband connections, what else is allowed to happen? you a now -- allowed new housing to go ahead. these are on brownfield sites that were never considered before. that is the way forward. [applause] people to get a foot on the housing l

going to have zero carbon, be carbon neutral, by 2050. we can do it.ith new technology, we can do it. we can become carbon neutral by 2050. we can beat the skeptics. this country leads the world and satellite technology. we are building two spaceports. the whole of the u.k. will benefit from these investments. soon we will be sending missions to the heavens. geostationary satellites, which, by the way, infrastructure in space will be of huge value to this country. can you think of anyone who could trial the first mission? [laughter] prime minister johnson: can you think -- can you think which communist cosmonaut we should coax into the cockpit? [laughter] johnson: let's -- let's -- well, there you go. the invitation is there. let's get brexit done on october 31. not just because we have such an immense agenda to take this country forward, but, of course, an opportunityis in itself. we will take back control of our fisheries and the extreme wealth of scotland, one of the bizarre features of the snp. they aregeon, committed to handing back --trol, handin