's carbonate commodity? how do you feel? 's carbonate commodity? >> i guess i would be a little tongue and she can say a farmers start growing and then it will be a commodity. we tend to do that 2 things because we do such a good job and are so efficient. i think it might be looked at that like other commodities we need to be careful about sharing the value that goes to the farmer because what ends of happening when you commoditize things is the share the goes to the actual farmer who is doing the bulk of the work gets smaller and smaller and i would just say that is my answer. >> this is a great discussion to have in this committee that the value if you call carbonate commodity which i don't think it is. where is the value? people are not being paid to produce the carbon. the value is in the service, the sequestration. to be considered a commodity we would need standardized contracts for trading the value of it. we don't trade on services like shingling a house so i think it is not a commodity but agriculture is leading the way and is the only ind

now on the other side of that, practices just beyond carbon, because of the carbon that is mitigated and tenant carbon that we never have to sequester printed in a tenant carbon that is avoided for certain amounts of methane or nitrous oxide is avoided is one that automatically is carbon in it. we don't have to track that further beyond that activity so we have activity -based as soon as they could flow through in our contract just like equal up where once that activity is done, it has permanence. that would be a good approach rated. >> thank you so much and i yield back. >> thank you very much printed and again there is moving on the mets were going to move to senator. >> i'm with you. >> another one of her great new members welcome party to. >> i appreciate that is good to be with you printed and ranking member bozeman for holding the steering is a pleasure to be with you all. it also grew up on a small hardware we commonly were self subsidence farmers know we have going right now it's a little bit of pay and some alfalfa and some other tracks. god willing i will be able to get bac

or were poisoned by carbon dioxide. -- carbon monoxide or were trapped in fires. overall, the crisis took the lives of 80 people and the estimate of damage to people's homes, their businesses and livelihoods are expected to reach over $90 billion. it is heartbreaking and it should never have happened in this country. it is clear texas was ill prepared for unusually frigid temperatures. gas-fired power plants natural , gas wellheads succumbed to temperatures they were not prepared for. it was not the first time we saw devastation fueled by climate change. sadly, it will not be the last. as we are here today, a report released this morning by the government accountability office found climate change is expected to have far-reaching effects on the electricity grid that could cost the american people tens of billions of dollars in damage and power outages, like the devastation we just saw in texas. damage and power outages, like the devastation we just saw in texas. a future of suffering from climate change is not written in stone. we can invest in a cleaner electric

hydrogen carbonate.had we capitalize on this infrastructure if i want my state to be part of this hydrogen future that may be out there? >> thank you for the question, senator, and we want every state to become a a part of a hydron future as well as the electric transportation future and the biofuel future as it's appropriate. we would love to work with you to talk about local programs that we can put in place in order to move this forward. and so we would love to be in touch following up. >> so is blue hydrogen part of the plan as opposed to the so-called green hydrogen? blue hydrogen being made from -- >> absolutely. it is not been the lead on that. that's an office of fossil but they're also looking at carbon reduction ways from the fossil fuels to be able to create hydrogen. in fact, there's a funny opportunity on the street right now regarding that. so yes, sir -- funding opportunity. .. >> and heavy duty, and the u.s. will be in the single digit perfect by 2030. >> and what about lng as a transport

car uses carbon, use carbon to generate the electricity and i'm trying to figure out how much carbone used to make renewable diesel versus the electricity for a car? and that's certainly a metric we can get, i would think. >> we'll be certain to follow up. >> one more question for you. how do we measure the environmental impact of the disposing of the batteries? >> thank you for that question as well. we are working on a number of initiatives on recycling and reuse and their carbon impacts. we've mentioned a few of those programs earlier today, with the resell and the prizes that we have. we're working on that aspect -- >> i know there's a future that we are hoping to be able to recycle, but right now, there is an environmental impact, it is something to we dispose electric batteries. how are we majoring that impact? >> certainly, we are measuring that impact with respect to the electric vehicles, as well as all types of vehicles, whether they be internal combustion or electric vehicles. >> thank, you i yield back. >> thank you senator. we'll go back to senator hoeven at this time. i

it's 55% of our carbon-free energy. and, you rticalknow, i am fortu that i operate in a vertically g integrated environment, so i can -- i can convince my regulators, hopefully, of the importance of nuclear, but when you're in a deregulated market and competing against purr price, it's not always recognized. i think there are ways we can preserve the nuclear fleet with grants. i think there was a legislation proposed around that or through. tax incentives, and i think it's extremely important as we look at that going to beforward. i'm also, try to be technology f agnostic, to get the last bit o carbon off our grid, but i'm a big fan of next generation nuclear and things like small sudular reactors. >> so, let me go to my second ie subject. that is the use of. technology. we are behind technology. it was mentioned during this panel that technology on batterr storage. we're not where weuilding need f what -- as we're looking at building back better, what type of incentives can we put into i congressional action that will

zero are you referring to generate electricity for any type of electric car uses carbon you use carbonenerate the electricity and i think trying to figure out how much carbon do we use to make renewable diesel versus electricity for a car that's certainly a metric we should be able to get i would think. >> certainly. we'll be certain to follow-up with you. >> one last question for you -- how do you measure the environmental impact of disposing of the batteries? >> we are thank you for that question as well. we are working on a number of initiatives on recycling and reuse in their carbon impact. we've mentioned a few of those, a few of those programs earlier today witha the resell and the - prizes that we have going. we're working on that aspect -- >> i know there's a future that we're hoping we're tiebl recycle but right now asserting there's an environmental impact to do something as we dispose of the electric batteries how are we measuring that impact? >> certainly. we are measuring that impact the electricto vehicles as well as all type of vehicles.th whether they be internal combus

the byproduct is carbon dioxide. as the gas rises the crude or pig iron melts and flows to the bottom. to do sport based company wants to reduce those c o 2 emissions and eventually eliminate them. they're carrying out tests to see of hydrogen could be used in the furnace instead of carbon. that currently completing the initial phase 1st we have to figure out a good way to get the hydrogen deep into the furnace after. if. it's a tricky process because hydrogen is a highly reactive element when it's combined with a. oxygen it forms a highly combustible gas oxy hydrogen every 2 hours the steel workers tap off the fresh pay die and samples are sent to the laboratory on site where the quality of the iron and other raw materials is checked for. the hydrogen technique is also new territory for the engineers here. and of course have us for being part of this transformation is a huge challenge it's not as easy as people might think that 1st if we're now injecting hydrogen and furnace that means our tests also have to be chan

part of course that's pure stored carbon half of this plant matter consists of carbon and that's stored away then grows up layer by layer with asin the order of half a millimeter to one millimeter per year over thousands of years these layers a meters thick and contain a great deal of carbon that spew a climate protection pool in cream ice which. this only applies to intact since almost all bugs in germany have been drained they give off a lot of greenhouse gases almost 6 percent of total emissions more than air traffic . and. we calculated that if we restore water to drain bogs we will be able to compensate for even more than the warming caused by c o 2 emissions since the industrial revolution. just so bokhari we're seeing is a very important step along with creating cooling systems through world that's getting warmer anyway. that would be desirable but how would it be possible to restore boggs to the natural state in an industrialized country like germany. the largest oil and gas deposits in the north sea off the coast of starving i in no way the plans would mean pumping would contin

hydrogen that we can make from zero carbon electricity.we know how to build ships which run on ammonia, which can be zero carbon fuel. it makes the countries willing to say we can commit to get to net zero but midcentury, and we know it's not going to cost our economy anything more than a trivial amount. then within that, you have companies saying we know that our country wants us to get to net zero, but we also know that the technologies are there. so companies make a commitment. once a company starts saying that, that gives more countries the confidence, if our company say they can get there, and business people who actually run businesses are confident that it is technologically possible, we can make that fit. that's how this reinforcing loop works. is been more effective over the last two or three years than i had dared hope for. rishaad: has the pandemic been a reset, has it brought climate issues to the fore? and the second part of the question, to make low carbon solutions a priority? >> when covid-19 really broke out last year, the

the fourth area is the demand for carbon and carbon offsets. as the economy works to decarb onize, we are finding offsets to help them achieve their objectives. you put that together, the converging at this point in time gives us an opportunity to try to drive that. those things have to work together and come together. that will set the investment. alix: not quite there yet. you mentioned the venture capital money. it brings up what occidental has done, which is basically getting other people to find carbon capture investments. who might you think about partnering with the do something similar? darren: as i've said, this is a growing space. if you look at the growth in venture funds and climate tech, they have grown five times faster than the average venture fund growth. that growth has been concentrated in transportation mobility. there is a big opportunity and the power generation sectors and industrial sectors for additional investment. there is opportunities, which is part of what the new low carbon solutions business will be focused on. fi

low carbon in the u.s.and the question of whether we should be shutting down our nuclear plants and what are we going to replace them with, that is a pretty live on right now. in a way and there's also an argument on whether if our concern is getting rid of carbon emissions should we be building more nuclear plants. i'm not going to stand on that right now. ati do share a lot of the conces about nuclear waste. we do not h have anywhere to put nuclear waste, is offsetting in containment parts of the original facilities. so even after 60 years, we have not come up with a solution to the problem long-term waste and need to be stored for all intensive purposes once again forever. it i believe there are a lot of risks to power. and the fact of the matter is once again somewhat practical matter in this country in the u.s. at least would not building nuclear plants because there's simply too expensive. it the risk factors into that but there too expensive to build nuclear facilities. peter: from california what is

the byproduct is carbon dioxide. as the gas rises the crude opaque i am melts and flows to the bottom. to do sport based company wants to reduce those c o 2 emissions and eventually eliminate them. they're carrying out tests to see if hydrogen could be used in the furnace instead of carbon. that currently completing the initial phase 1st we have to figure out a good way to get the hydrogen deep into the furnace. awful. but. it's a tricky process because hydrogen is a highly reactive element when it's combined with oxygen it forms a highly combustible gas oxy hydrogen. every 2 hours the steel workers tap off the fresh. samples are sent to the laboratory on site where the quality of the iron and other raw materials is checked. the hydrogen technique is also a new territory for the engineers here. and of course to have us for being part of this transformation is a huge challenge it's not as easy as people might think that if we're now injecting hydrogen into furnace that means our tests also have to be changed to that o

we're going to make those hard you coughlan's from carbon dioxide coming out of the atmosphere. and from the energy from the sun and we will produce oxygen and the high. and you carbon as a fuel or a plastic whatever precursor we need and so that's the general process of of your senses which which balances with our consumption and 00 hydrocarbons that we do in the moment there is a balancing that's going on between the creation of the petroleum synthetic petroleum and oxygen so there's a crack there so there's a there isn't the process is attempting to right a balance in the ecosystem where you've got now represent you've got a petro center says that oxygen is also being created at the same 3 you know we look at nature has been in balance for hundreds of millions of years and through this chemistry which we call the carbon cycle and what we need to do you want to carry on with our current civilization is to recreate that same balance but on an industrial level so we've done the burning day and we need to make the bit that creates these fuels and these plastics and all these mate

producers of carbon dioxide worldwide. but as yet these homes made from discarded containers on a still something of an experiment rather than a go to housing solution. this becomes mainstream in terms of acceptance that people think that reuse is not because i can't afford it but because it's making us sick and environmental sense so to be achieved that probably you know it's just in that zone where we're trying it out. the designers have built 16 container homes so far and saved close $220.00 tons of steel. and perhaps even more important that is spreading the word of rehabilitation and eco friendly constructions amongst the youngest into song. i hope to be is that the thought has given you a sense of how people around the world are making sustainable choices when it comes to men living spaces and i hope you had many takeaways from it we'll see you again next week until then stay safe big good care to your loved ones and yourselves in the box. it is in freefall. the state has announced. and as long as commissions are. bi

nuclear is right now a very significant source of low carbon electricity in the u.s.and the question of whether we should be shutting down the rest of the nuclear plants and what are we going to replace them with is a pretty live one l right now in a way. there's also an argument about whether we, if our concern is getting rid of these emissions should we be building new nuclear plants andnd i am not going to take it to stand on that right now. i do share a lot of the concerns about nuclear waste. we do not have anywhere to put nuclear waste as the caller said it's sitting at the original facilities after 60 years we haven't come up with a solution to the problem of long term nuclear waste. this stuff needs to be stored for all intensive purposes, once again, forever. i agree there are a lot of risks to nuclear power. and the fact of the matter is once again it's a somewhat practical matter in california this question what is your position on natural gas? >> it is a major source of what's powering our electrical grid. i'm not sure i know the exact, but it's quite high

they are going to produce carbon dioxide, so how on earth are you going to become carbon neutral?carbon neutral? by 2030 we will have 8096 _ become carbon neutral? by 2030 we will have 8096 of _ become carbon neutral? by 2030 we will have 8096 of cars - we will have 80% of cars electrified and then what is very important by our goal is that we are not only concentrating on product but also on the whole use period and life—cycle of a card. we know very well what consumption we have on carbon dioxide, therefore we will invest also to increase the pool of sustainable energy. and then it is credible what you're doing and we will spend over1 billion euros in the next ten years to fulfil this target to be carbon dioxide neutral in 2030. . . ., 2030. the chief executive of the porch — 2030. the chief executive of the porch -- _ 2030. the chief executive of the porch -- porsche. - today marks world water day, held on 22 march every year since 1993 it raises awareness of the 2.2 billion people living without access to safe water. a core focus of world water day is to support the achievemen

a carbon footprint is the total amount of greenhouse gases which includes carbon dioxide, a very emitterllution from cars, that's generated by our actions. every single task we do, or most tasks we leave behind some sort of carbon footprint. so the last year by staying at home, working interest home and not commuting, i had a solid 11 tons of co2 this past year saved, which was pretty remarkable. when we look at the entire microclimate weather team, myself, kari hall, rob mayeda, we had a 67.5-ton savings of co2 this past year, which equalled 29% reduction in our carbon footprint. most of that was transportation-related, so the savings is real from all of us doing the work from home. a side effect of covid-19, of course. as the covid restrictions continue to lower, you may also want to continue to lower your carbon footprint. these are simple stuff. we live busy lives, but buying local food can help. buy in bulk. keep your water heater down to 120 degrees. carpool, who knows, maybe your work will still offer work from home. you do three days at the office, two days wfh, as they call it,

gigatons gigatons there's more carbon friends if you look at a tree it's more carbon in the mycelium in the associate with the roots of the tree then there is in the tree itself the think of that. and this is a big reason why a solution to climate change is building soils how do we build 'd soils we grow fungi and fungi when they grow about 85 percent of the mycelium is carbon and so the biggest reservoir of biological carbon in the soil is mycelium dead and alive when the mycelium dies is there for years and centuries and so it's a carbon sink so the loss of soils the thinning of soils the loss of biodiversity is causing famines is causing climate change roshan the loss of bio bio security because biodiversity is plummeted and so fungi are a solution for rebuilding the soil ecosystems that lead to sustainability of our food supply ok that brings up one of our 1st questions from our community it's ph d. partition. i'm a prime mispronounce that question is a better attempt that it. looks like that actually paul here. one striking statistic is that of the 3000000 species of fungi estim

what is the value of a carbon tax? >> a carbon tax? >> yes, ma'am. >> the idea behind the carbon tax is you would make activities that generate activities more expensive and technologies that don't generate carbon. solar panels, for example, would be less expensive in that way shifts the economy. it's either carbon free or lower omitting sources. that's the same principal behind, you know, putting a tax on cigarettes. you know, i think the theory is if you had an economy wide tax on carbon and it was enough it would shift the calculation for big emitters producing humanly amounts of power. economist would argue the carbon tax is the most efficient way to reduce emissions. it would use the market forces to drive down emissions as opposed to imposing a bunch of regulations which is another way to go, absolutely. this means you might not take the lowest cost route to reduce emissions. >> in a new yorker piece you write about iceland and the fact that there is no coronavirus there. >> well, that was a trip i took in may. they had managed t

alix: we will get to carbon capture in one second.ew board makeup and how the priorities may not differ with the ones currently there. what is the likelihood that the new board might revisit a dividend cut? darren: we will go back to the three priorities we have. managing the ups and downs of the cycle, and returning cash to the shareholders from that has been a big part of the dividend policy. we talk about that as a board every quarter. striking the balance between those three pillars within our capital allocation program, it is a continuing discussion and i think our new board members are breaking perspective of how we effectively allocate capital to make sure the transition is a success longer-term. alix: what are my conversation with darren woods. -- part of my conversation with darren woods for some at 1:00 p.m. in new york and 6:00 p.m. in london wasn't joining us is the barclays senior u.s. integrated oil and bnp analyst with an overweight rating for exxon. what do you think of exxons plans to increase spending from 2022 to 20

>> a carbon tax? >> host: yes, ma'am. >> guest: the idea behind a carbon tax issueou would make activities that generate carbon more expensive and technologies that don't generate carbon. so let's say solar panels for very obvious example comparatively, less expensive. we would in that way shift are common shift our energy sources to either carbon free or lowering sources. that is the same principle behind putting attacks on cigarettes. i think the theory is if you you really had an economy wide tax on carbon we would certainly shift most efficient way to reduce emissions. as opposed to imposing a bunch of regulations which is another way to go, absolutely. which means you might not be taking the lowest-cost route for reducing emissions. >> recent u new yorker peace you write about iceland and the lack, the fact there is no coronavirus there. >> guest: that's a chip i took in may. they had managed to successfully contain the coronavirus for they had a bad outbreak and managed to get basically done to

free in less than ten years and 100% carbon free by 2035. like president biden's plan, the legislation would also push additional burdens on americas electric grids through the electrification of buildings and vehicles that would otherwise rely on oil and natural gas. we should pursue ways to generate electricity that produces less greenhouse gas emissions. we must not do so at the expense of the reliability, resiliency or affordability of electric services. that means supporting the continuation and expansion of electricity generation from power, from hydro power, natural gas and through coal. thank you, mister chairman. >> thank you, senator. >> mister chairman? before we start i'm just curious. i noticed there's no one from ercot on our list of witnesses today and i'm just wondering why that is. >> it sure wasn't for lack of inviting them. we invited everybody from ercot and spoke to everybody that still left but i'm not sure anybody's left. >> so ercot chose not to be here? >> what they did, they needed to remain available to the direct

i see roc you know the kind of things we find on earth rocks including carbon including water on their surface in the form of ice and that's what we've seen thousands of times we've never seen and nitrogen pure nitrogen chunk and then you know so it's something that we have never seen before and we're supposed to believe that more than anything artificial in this mist artificial possibility based on that and the other thing is you know carbon and nitrogen are produced in stars by the same process and usually you know there is one example of a nitrogen rich comet that we have seen that the authors of the space are are mentioning and that one actually shows also evidence for carbon so i rest my case whenever you know typically you get carbon together with nitrogen and why would you scrape off the surfaces of pluto like objects and create the vast majority or being the star object this way or is of special fractional being this that our object this way rather than have the majority of them being rocks like we find the source is the problem saying is we look at our backyard that we see ira

based fuels in the vapor that comes came out of fear or what if it thought it so there was no carbon and the claim is ok maybe it's just pure nitrogen and one environment where you find pure nitrogen with live very little carbon is the surface of brutal very thin veneer you know less than a percent of the mass of blue dog on the surface is made of pure nitrogen so that proportionally ears that you just scrape off the surface of pluto like planets around other stars you create chunks and what we are seeing as the 1st interests that are objects or more and more are was one of these chunks the think that you have to keep in mind is we have never seen and nitrogen object in the solar system saw we have the saw cord or plug of you know about a 1000000000 objects larger than manhattan island in this in the periphery of the solar system and all thousands of those examples of objects that we saw from the environment of the solar system were made off i see rock you know the kind of things we find on earth rocks including carbon including water on their surface in the form of ice and that's wh

countries can'tjust other countries can't just export carbon other countries can'tjust export carbonnd i think as that plays out, i thank you will see a lot more rapid progress in terms of green technologies, green investments and ways to reduce carbon. so, i think the only question on the climate is can we do it fast enough? will we act quickly enough? d0 can we do it fast enough? will we act quickly enough? do you believe in _ we act quickly enough? do you believe in the _ we act quickly enough? do you believe in the idea _ we act quickly enough? do you believe in the idea of- we act quickly enough? do you believe in the idea of a - we act quickly enough? do you believe in the idea of a globall believe in the idea of a global social contract then? which would include sort of obligations, mutual obligations, mutual obligations, on things like action to save us from dangerous climate change? because i'm very mindful that you are actually born in egypt, and that this conversation sounds very different when it's held in a developing country where the population want to see the industri

i think more and more countries are looking at carbon taxes.hat other countries can'tjust export carbon to them, and you have a more level playing field. and i think as that plays out, i think you will see a lot more rapid progress in terms of green technologies, green investments and ways to reduce carbon. so, i think the only question on the climate is can we do it fast enough? will we act quickly enough? do you believe in the idea of a global social contract, then? which would include sort of obligations, mutual obligations, on things like action to save us from dangerous climate change? because i'm very mindful that you were actually born in egypt, and that this conversation sounds very different when it's held in a developing country where the population want to see the industrialisation, the growth, the prosperity that we in the west have enjoyed, and sometimes we then say, �*ah, well, now everybody has to abandon notions of growth and prosperity in the old traditional sense because we can't afford the carbon that would cost.�* that's not

producers of carbon dioxide worldwide.but as yet these homes made from discarded containers on a still something of an experiment rather than a go to housing solution. this becomes mainstream in terms of acceptance that people thing that you use is not because i can't afford it but because it's making us and environmental science so to be achieved that probably you know it's just in the in about as or maybe you're trying it out. the designers have built 16 container homes so far and saved close $220.00 tons of steel. and perhaps even more important to spreading the word of rehabilitation and eco friendly constructions amongst the youngest into song. i hope to visit the thought has given you a sense of how people. are making sustainable choices when it comes to the living spaces and i hope you had many takeaways from it we'll see you again next week until then stay safe big good care of your loved ones and yourselves in the back. the bomb is in freefall. the state has announced control. on islamised missions harmed billions

i actually think it's not, it's carbon dioxide, it's carbon dioxide, it's a chemical david, fed ex is involved with almost every single one of these companies that i bring on that, are smacks spacs, that have different way, fed ex is one of the most important questions how much of fed ex's move though is about amazon saying to its suppliers you better start being carbon neutral >> without a doubt it's definitely industry-wide. and one company pushing another. and it is the believe and/or the fear among some of the ceos that if they don't get out in front of this, they're going to have trouble, not only the shareholder base or attracting or expanding their shareholder base but with the employees and you hear it time and again, i've been doing this series, evolve series on the web, interviewing a lot of well known ceos, talking about some of these issues, in fact, i recently spoke to mike, somebody you know well, who runs chevron, the competitor to exxon and we also talked about carbon capture, and when we can actually get to a point where it may become at least more cost effective. tak

carbon capture and storage chill c.c.s. it's also been researched in germany a 2017 experiment was a success the c o 2 remained in the ground under kit steam in eastern germany but it raised fears of earthquakes and escaping gases and since then the storage of c o 2 has been politically dead in gemini even the search is essentially for him put it. into. into the scene where i was also deeply involved in the safety council if i would have gladly built or close to the storage facility at any time without any word or to get us all. out of been worried if i would put it on the wrong plates in the wrong way with the wrong partner. it's clear that countries like germany that emit a lot of c o 2 also have to take responsibility for it he says c.c.'s is indispensable is get upset so. you know there are estimates but in europe we have enough storage space for 1000 years for a c o 2 emissions woman at the moment we have c.c.'s as a good alternative. if someone has a better one in 30 years all the better out. to but right now we have

producers of carbon dioxide worldwide.but as yet these homes made from discarded containers on a still something of an experiment rather than a go to housing solution. this becomes mainstream in terms of acceptance that people thing that you use is not because i can't afford it but because it's making as an environmental science so to be achieved that probably you know it's just in. trying it out. the designers have built 16 homes so far and saved close $220.00 tons of steel. and perhaps even more important they're spreading the word of rehabilitation and eco friendly constructions amongst the youngest and. i hope to visit the thought has given you a sense of how people. are making sustainable choices when it comes to the needing spaces and i hope you had many takeaways from it we'll see you again next week until the 5th big good care of your loved ones and yourselves in the box. because chang. the way the words of the office alito moms and this made me to make calls little exercise at home has serious consequences for you

know it's a big mouthful -- but it basically removes carbon and sequesters it underground. west virginia, a great place for geothermal. they sit on top of a geothermal hot spot. what is geothermal? it means pulling clean energy from the ground. in mining places, we need minerals to be able to produce batteries for electric vehicles. right now, we get these minerals -- they're critical minerals -- we get them from places that are under china's thumb. well, we should be producing the means for our own energy independence in the united states by responsibly mining for the minerals that will allow us to build the whole battery supply chain. you've heard recently about the loss of semiconductor -- semiconductors in the united states because we don't have access to the critical materials. one of the minerals in silicon, for example, we should be mining that. we should be doing that process in the united states instead of allowing our economic competitors to eat us for lunch. so those strategies, those opportunities, this is what we're talking about, creating a full supply chain t

about 50% of the oxides of nitrogen and 90% of the carbon monoxide.t you have left is just a little bit. narrator: the components of the system are neither complex nor exotic. tanks to hold the compressed natural gas. ♪ two regulators to reduce the tank pressure to less than one pound per square inch. ♪ two solenoids so the driver can switch back and forth to gasoline from natural gas. and the heart of the system, a fuel air mixer that replaces the air cleaner atop a standard automobile carburetor. ♪ while the cost of conversion is about $340 per vehicle, there is evidence there are significant cost savings associated with the system. ♪ >> if you compare natural gas to gasoline, the most important thing you find is natural gas is actually cheaper than gasoline and as a consequence, every mile you run is saving you money. when you burn natural gas, it doesn't form any deposits. it doesn't dilute the oil or require spark plugs. you end up with considerable savings in terms of oil changes, oil filters and spark plug changes. you have to buy the mixer and

so i rest my case whenever you know typically you get carbon together with nitrogen and why would you scrape off the surfaces of pluto like objects and create the bust majority or being the star object this way or it is of special fractional being distant object this way rather than have the majority of them being rocks like refining the source is the problem saying is we look at our backyard that we see iraq's then you tell me all in this street there are very different type of logics actually nitrogen pure and i said ok maybe you know that's a possibility but it's certainly not an appealing possibility let me show our audience this path check this galileo italian astronomer it was a physicist who was a philosopher as well going up against the church the church was serious at his idea of what our solar system looked like he was right they were wrong you mentioned in your book a year modern day galileo. well that's a good question and you know it really is the bends in the response of the community i am just just like busted ballplayers keep my eyes on the ball not on the audience i d