the bill over time got changed but it was very much viewed as ananti-cca bill. thank you, commissioner lindo. >> thank you. you mentioned the possibility of decreasing the percentage of from 100 percent to perhaps 75, 50, i'm not sure exactly where we might land, but i'm curious if you have any many of that decrease to help us facilitate this implementation. this commission is tasked with power through sf, will this help expedite the process? >> it could. it's one of the those policy decisions that needs to be rediscussed. when our next report comes out and shows that the jobs can be created and it's good for the local economy and good for the environment that the puc will say, we put this on hold and now some issues are being addressed. i would encourage at that point that puc say let's not throw the entire cca program but let's reevaluate. is the 100 percent necessary. one thing you can talk about if especially you are starting with a smaller program, the puc can have enough energy to cover most of that, but most of that is hydroand not considered renewable. w

based on the discussions i have had with you that cca continue to be the priority and this would be secondary work for me and i would work with this intensively as cca wouldn't be, it's not going to be something that gets jumped on tomorrow because i'm still working with puc and getting comments to when we get to that subject matter next and where is the balance supposed to be for me so i have my clear direction. >>supervisor john avalos: first let's go to supervisor tang where your expectation around it? >>supervisor katy tang: obviously the sooner the better. i appreciate the work of mr. freed and the main goals of lafco. i do want to refer to the commission but would love to see something within a year at least. >>supervisor john avalos: why don't we expect that the next lafco meeting you can provide a scope of work entails and providing a scope of work before delving into the research you can do that and you can give us a sense of what your current commitment is around cca and so it gives you a month to continue to work on cca and divide your time and work on your scope of the p

anyway it works in california has the impact of the form and success of cca. i would ask that lafco take a look at that process where there was just a hearing in san francisco i think one or two 2 weeks ago on this and it will be on going for the next several months and just to make sure that the puc is representing the city's interest, their interest and the interest of a future cca in the energy metering process in addition to the green tariff process. >>supervisor london breed: thank you, any other members of the public that would like to provide public comment at this time? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> if i may ask the clerk in tools to indulge clarification. >> yes. >> we have provided information under the act at our cost. our cost is typically below the market price for wholesale electric sales. to the extent we have power available beyond that today that power is sold into wholesale market and we receive to going rate. san francisco is not in the habit of selling power below market prices. under the wiener legislation referred to earlier t