source of power it's important to note that clean construction mitigation has been a requirement at ceqa and states projecting in the hot zone will be using cleaner requirements by the standard of our city projects we're streamlining the process for public projects previously we would do a separate air quality analysis to tell us what we already know and impose the mitigation measures adding time and measures for the mitigating process now i'm going to bring up staff from the planning department i think we have w5id and department of public health karen to briefly go over thank you go over with us a little bit about the legislation so it's at staff short presentation. >> thank you. >> i'm karen on behalf of the health department to offer our support and reiterate the things that supervisor just told you all i know i've shown this committee if f this graphic before and the purpose of this graphic from e ta to really enforce the information caused by particularly matter and dell sale it caused cardiovascular disease a good illumination i want to point out that part of failure heart conditi

with the historic district it is trauma this is not the main district by done the complete survey ceqa asked us to look at the known and potential district f this is a potential district been identified before this project and in resource evaluations since then we've documented this numerous times at this hearing the planning department took discretionary review and removed the proposed vertical addition of the garbage at the rear the property a detached garage with regards to the main building they left that a that 80 up to the variance hearing and subsequent to that hamburger we've sat down with staff and discussed some possible alternatives that's where the quote/unquote guidelines came back about that he put those hocking out to the project sponsor and it was clear that didn't represent a decision had that represent a decision we would have september out a letter with those points out we did with with mr. jeremy represented the neighbors i've received comments he'll be representing all the dr requesters and moving forward we communicated back to him the response from the project sp

action if there's a ceqa appeal before the board of supervisors this is the first change to this. >> i'm willing to accept the eight. >> i concur. >> one week before? >> how much. >> how many pages of briefing. >> maybe summarize in two pages. >> i'll give them 3 did he hear 4 with exhibits or without. >> with exhibits. >> with laura. >> how about 4 with exhibits. >> did you get something from mta? i understand >> so i don't know if there's a motion made i'm waiting. >> move to continue this case until april 8th briefs due one week before a maximum of 3 pages with exhibits. >> just to be clear a summary of briefing 3 pages maximum with exhibits okay. >> all right. and we've called public comment mr. pacheco the roll. >> we have a motion from commissioner fung to reschedule item 6 to april 8th the briefing scheduled is reset to 3 pages per party unlimited exhibits simultaneous filings due one thursday prior. >> commissioner president lazarus commissioner vice president honda commissioner wilson is absent thank you. the vote is 3 to zero this matter is rescheduled until april 8th. >> b

as many historic may eliminator reduce for ceqa purposes. therefore it is not a partial preservation alternative. however depending on a particular project and in combination with other features, retaining a facade facing the public right-of-way for allowing to the understanding of the historic massing of feature for a useful partial alt ernative in cases by case draft by eir. that concludes my presentation. >> commissioners questions? >> just one minor question. when we are dealing with a landscape, we don't have language that talks about the introduction -- destruction of a landscape. i don't know how critical because every project is on a case by case basis. i don't know that i ever read any eir about the changes in a landscape for a park. i don't know that it's critical that we add anything here. but given the fact that we've taken out about structures i don't know if there should be another word or two in that paragraph to handle that. >> any other questions before we go to public comment. ( any member of the public please come forward.

appeal when we heard the ceqa appeal on the pilot program the opts modest the argument that mta was ironics wrong and we don't have the authority to enter into that with shuttle drivers there were members of the board of supervisors that expressed agreement it was illegal to enter into that i've not spoken to the author of this legislation i can't speak for him in terms of his motivation, in fact, there's a law pevend that is illegal for the mta underline state law to enter into state law with the shuttle drivers this clarifies that and i think that the staffs again, i'm not making a motion to support this this is in the early stamps but we can tell it is moving in the direction to clarify state law those kinds of agreements are permissible that's why we should move to a watch position. >> any further discussion just to recap a motion made to reverse the decision from the finance commission - committee to the prefer decision by the finance committee to oppose sate bill 61 and that was seconded by supervisor tang mr. clerk but with let could roll call vote. >> let's take public comme

a result are smaller backyard they use the garages and a safe place for the kids to play that was ceqas plan for use settled one hundred years ago there was nothing exceptional and most importantly that applies to neighboring properties it can't be a basis for a finding of circumstance third 2825 is no at historical resource can only be registered and the district has discussed is more eligible is not a category recognized by law but even sea crystal-clear were a registration historic district it will apply and not only to 2825 finding two requires the only two exceptional circumstances enforcement of the zoning cone e code relatives in a hardship nothing if one causes the hardship named in two historic sensitivity is not require standing in back they can go out the back finding two is a error no exceptional circumstances at all and the one main circumstance didn't cause unnecessary hardship. >> sir, your time is up. >> thank you. next speaker, please. >> commissioner president lazarus and members of the commission good evening. i'm tim, i live on 29th avenue with my wife and 3 kids adj

appeal when we heard the ceqa appeal on the pilot program the opts modest the argument that mta was ironics wrong and we don't have the authority to enter into that with shuttle drivers there were members of the board of supervisors that expressed agreement it was illegal to enter into that

appeal on that matter that the ceqa will continue to the board will continue the appeal on the office allocation until april 8th the next on sanchez when was the third hearing at the board of appeals that the board had serious concerns about the project impact on the vanity property which the property of the appellants they didn't find that the full stent of the variance was justified a go rear yard encroachment and the certainly they gave us direction to work with the parties to look at alternatives that includes the shipping moving forward with the r5ishgd and having less of an impact on the neighborhood and we meet for the first time with the parties and the second time this week with the parties looking at different alternatives and something that was property by the appellants when the permit holder accepted it allows for similar non-development to shift the certainly forward that was a concern it will not be something they can afford the appellants and the other parties have engineers and have argument about the costs in the proposal that was forwarded by the appellant it shifts

after the election we submitted our paperwork we needed with the planning department to start the ceqarocess so in what is up on the screen right now you see we've been now at that coming up on 4 years as brad mentioned the term sheet in the middle of 2013 set the land use plan that i would say 95 percent of which you'll see remains true with the prop f step last year we think of advancing two years ahead of schedule the community outreach we'll need for a project approval we're not moving into the design and planning we'll talk about the pieces the eir drives the process we're some more in the range of 21, 22 eir process that is driven by the time infractions framed that the planning department we'll work as hard as we can to make that process quickly than the 22 months because time is money and an concurrent basis we'll be working on the specific plans that inform the ceqa analysis and really are part of the package materials that we would ultimately bring to you asking for your support that include the design guidelines to implicitly when small business ultimate is building and desi

buildings i'll put the cursor here it is a little bit out of scale and received category exemption from ceqa it doesn't retain any historic value the project sponsor is hoping to update it and improve the experience for the tenants by maintaining 3 rent control units by increasing the units from one bedroom to 3 bedroom and in one case existing site this is a shot at the rear showing the existing conditions okay so just looking at the site plans quickly just to show it is really hard to see so sorry about that so what i walked through before was the better representation of the set back we have introduced for working with the neighbor and preserving light and private on her does it is not worth looking at those site plans maybe the project sponsor want to say something. >> i'm thompson my husband and i bought the building one year ago we had another condo we rented out for the last ten years not rent control we've been treating it as rent control we're interested in the same experience that is our last planned purchase and we you know worked with planning and the neighbors and trying to get

upcoming meetings the city and school districts will meet on february 27th and san francisco and sfmta ceqa there will be a curriculum committee on monday in addition to the math update a health education curriculum and kip renewable petitions on the agenda on miracle fourth the meeting of the budget committee american people the rainy day reserve the planning and kip renewable on march 4 and march 16 is the next month to month of the building and grounds committee there will be a committee as a whole on the early budget priority recommendations on march 17 and of course our regular board meeting will be held on march 10 and 24 any other reports or announcements from my colleagues. >> ms. fewer. >> i'd like to report on thursday, february 12th commissioner vice president haney and i went to the academy their student example of learning was outstanding commissioner vice president haney may want to comment on the work of the students i was so impressed they had their work out and tashlgd in a professional woo just how they made the mousetrap car and also combined that with an art budget i thi

this item you will be making environmental findings for california environmental quality act known as ceqa. so here is a map familiar to all members of the public of the shipyard, it's context. it's almost 800 acres altogether with candlestick point. it's in the southeast corner of san francisco. and developing the project in two phases, approved in 2003 and 2003 over all housing availability part of the housing development there. this 3 million square feet of office space in redevelopment space. in total, altogether this project will generate over 12,000 jobs every year and over $90 million of community benefits. so let's move into major phase design. you can see here this high level size map of top phase one. we have here to the commission's left but to my right the overall land project both phase 1 and 2 dda's. you can't see it, it's small but it's the biggest component, the last portion of over 400 units. we call this block 48. it was created that way. a single block, basically town homes and a much denser more smart we think urban design for the project to increase density on this blo

department and the department of building inspection has worked with a you supervisors to address ceqa providing for applications and shortening the timelines insuring the responsible timeline is accommodate san francisco but was we hear from you often we have to pay attention to the transit it is a system wide moma efficiency for the mta leading to faster more greater access to san franciscans if so on top of the transit projects including the van ness brt and the transbay center and the list goes on and on we've attracted incubators not only for technology but for manufacturing and biotechnology as well those phases allow a person with an idea to give it a try and provide them with a collaborative environment to test out their businesses business this helps to innovative san francisco in 2007 strategy emphasiss when it says we have expand academies in san francisco looking at mission bay we've succeeded a reach institution and startup that go to large companies and create the secretive environment we're working on this looking at hunters point we're focusing on continuing to drive de

want to reopen documentation it is important to go ahead and do so and meet all the requirements of ceqa san francisco puc is as busy as any agency they've been in their lifetime we want to make sure we gave me them early with the waterlines project and starting to evaluate alternative construction delivery methods that we'll see whether or not their feasible and bring to the committees and board in the future we learned add lesson on the ramp project is that the birds don't know what month of year when it's warm they start nest so we envision an early contract on the contract that was a delay because of bird nest issues that concludes my presentation. i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> thank you for you thorough presentation. >> commissioner christensen. >> i was occurs about the aesthetic and environmental impacts of the two choices we're certainly seeking in the presidio a modern preference for low profile and integrated roadways so up until the parrot of retaining walls i was thinking the preferred approach would have visible and environmental improvements what happens to the

supervisors i read the 19 page review from the planning department what is called for an exception from ceqa that was complete based on traffic data and in mid-day and at 4 o'clock as people testified the draft is worse between 5 and 8 o'clock at night inform studies about those and that was years ago we have the two lanes of traffic going to polk street there's not going to franklin it is already jammed you're going to have c n mc a densification of housing under plan bay area both long polk and van ness none of those issues were taking into account the coalition of the san francisco neighborhoods asked for eir that has absolutely essential about you go forward you need to see the human impacts your only advisory committee called for environmental impact report before you go forward as to the impact of taking away thirty percent of parking on polk street that is only a pine it is all the way to union taking away 60 percent of parking i'll ask you delay this until after the studies thank you very much. >> there are two christopher's in the room i'm going to stop calling both names. (calling

there are ceqa implications and policy implications to figure out what is the best course of action. i will say that somewhat related now that we have a compliance staff member, we are talking with the zoning administrator about certain policies on whether or not to require somebody to build something if it's been demolished or neglected and some of those policies will be coming to you this year hopefully by the summer and maybe at that time is a good opportunity to discuss situations like you are bringing up. i know, was it the columns at the san francisco center, there was a lawsuit >> no. the front part of the building. >> when we have that discussion can you bring some of the information because some of the analysis done was very good. i read it about 10 years ago. that would be good to rereview as part of that discussion. >> commissioners that will place us under commission matters. announcements. >> no announcements. consideration of adoption? >> seeing none, any member of the public wish to comment. seeing none. >> move to adopt. >> second. >> on that motion to adopt the minut

selected and in addition driving vehicles regulations from the dmv shortly and the performance of the ceqa type of performance there's a lot of going on at the state level i appreciate mark keeping track we had a visit from our federal agency mr. fox he visit good looking and mother-in-law view and attended along with a number of people from the san francisco's and your director of transportation bryan kelly was talking about the state of our system transportation unfortunately, the news was grim we're from a state of criticized with our international structure this is as supervisor avalos pointed out we've invested in our from to begin a national dialog will the state transportation we have a highway trust fund heading into the red and funded inadequately by the federal gas tax it funded not only highways but surface transportation across the modes and bicycling as well as and the pedestrian involvements investment so we rang the bell and called on everyone to paying attention e pay attention and particle with the new dialog in washington and congress to recognize this is a bipartisanship

upcoming meetings the city and school districts will meet on february 27th and san francisco and sfmta ceqa there will be a curriculum committee on monday in addition to the math update a health education curriculum and kip renewable petitions on the agenda on miracle fourth the meeting of the budget committee american people the rainy day

despite the issuance of the violations has been hazardous situation controls vicinity the california ceqa and conflict with the general plan that makes the office use in commercial permitted use the controls conflict with the building code and state building code and preempted by the stating and don't seek to comply with those codes we also maintain that those are controls don't apply to this property based on the lack of abandonment of ongoing commercial use here however if applied 0 those property had will constitute taking and we'll file an appeals. >> thank you very much good afternoon, supervisors i'm pat from the licensed structural engineer been practicing for 35 years i specialize on building and existing buildings revving i'm president of the structural innovation for the previous owner i spent 3 years studying and designing the proposed legalization of those units at 1049 and worked on the 1067 and this is before my lawyers got involved i couldn't get it to work to comply with the state law we say ask it to be down cut to the floor to be removed it is per rating a building like

schedule their many conceptual engineering and have begun the project descriptions to kickoff our ceqa pubically. >> pardon me. >> before you leave this slide so conceptual engineering will be completed by september. >> so that middle bullet is the tunnel that's itself bay area system it is a tunnel a comprehensive water shed evaluation of the hillside so many things have changed such a hard gray area a lot of times we quoted the approximate but the reason we started f that project was seismic to replace a channel that starts the channel station to 280 looking at the end of admission creek and takes side loads through the plant so discount flows the presidio and marina 80 percent of the flow to the southeast that's what trails them in and that asset is sitting there vulnerable. >> right you said that was going to go to senior martin luthern king, jr. and conceptual engineering i'm hoping there is steps in between i want to understand what our option are you know your analyzing them. >> just to clarify what the commission approved was feats one phase one was a preconstruction we'll have

allocated for to that so this o have an fte for special assignments for the curriculum development and the ceqa the will subsequential arts program development my question on this one is there your description on item no. 7 you indicate that this has been able to add teachers on special assignment and an additional administrator so those positions will stay in place or is that different from the fte that's being added so this means there's now three staff members and they're working on the subsequential updating the master plan i have general feelings about the areas i don't think that that we are prepared to vote for tonight at least i want to thank the staff important plugging in many of the changes and request that the board expressed in our meeting earlier and so i don't know how what you want to do if you're able to answer great and satisfies great but particularly with the programs i don't how to have a discussion around this to a point i'm going to be comfortable. >> i'd like to get as much progress so because we have the players around the table. >> superintendent carranza. >> thank you

what they would us to study and the questions they have that become included in the analysis that our ceqa team will actually prepare our hope would be that hopefully by christmas we can deliver a christmas present a draft eir and then sometime in the middle of summer of 2016 we'll have our financial environmental impact report and again, this drives the timeframe we have to have our environmental impact report certified by the planning department in order for your all and the board of supervisors to approve the development agreement and all the documents associated with that so that is the timeframe we're working under and that is the project that will be studied in the environmental document i'll be happy to answer any questions. >> public comment? seeing none, public comment is closed and commissioner woo ho >> i'm going to be brief given the late hour i appreciate the presentation we have a better understanding of how your preceding with the land use and it is familiar to what we saw before i don't have delayed questions but as you progress having those updates help us understand the b