the approval of the german security council, and in the security council chancellor scholz has a veto vote, that is, he can prohibit it, and it is not even, as far as we understand, it is even not... was put on the agenda of the security council, scholz blocks it, despite the fact that other members of the security council, such as representatives of the green or liberal party, are not against it, but scholz believes that this cannot be allowed, and so he invents all these arguments, which are either completely false or partly false, for example, that german soldiers are necessarily needed to service these missiles, this is not true, these missiles are in the... arms of south korea, there are no german soldiers there soldiers, or that these missiles can to reach moscow, this is also not the case in order to shoot these missiles at moscow, ukraine must first capture the belgorod and kursk regions, for example, which ukraine does not have in its plans, as far as i understand, or what to program these missiles, again you still need the coordinates that germany should transfer, this is al

this is probably why german chancellor scholz, immediately after his ambassador’s visit to the foreigny , found a new reason not to deliver. scholz said that to control the rocket pieces in order to they didn’t accidentally fly through moscow, the german military would have to, directly in ukraine, the participation of german soldiers in the war with the russians is excluded, at least for now it is excluded, look. “i have already said that i don’t think this is a good idea, we are the country that provides the greatest support to ukraine in europe. this year our budget is 7 billion euros. no other budget in the european union has so much, yet there are debates between the countries about individual weapon systems. you cannot transfer a weapon system that has a significant range and you don’t have to think about how to control it. if german soldiers are involved in this, then for me there can be no talk about it. however, in his direction, especially after the wiretapping scandal, especially from the side in kiev, this is the mantra of chancellor scholz, his own coalition allies in the

is, britain and france are already directly involved in the conflict in ukraine, said german chancellor scholz that he is not ready to send his german soldiers to ukraine. british and french critics gave scholz what is called a public flogging, the head's statement said. germany irresponsible, ally, blatant abuse of intelligence, the fact is that before, no one really reported that they not only sent stormshadow and scalp missiles, they also sent the military. the former commander of us forces in europe, hodges, advised scholz to remain silent and wait for the next order from london . the ex-leader of great britain wallis, who at one time... sent storm shadow to ukraine, made it clear how low olaf is in his eyes. according to wallis, scholz is absolutely the wrong person for such a job. important work. he is the wrong person, in the wrong position and at the wrong moment, he should resign. "german chancellor olaf scholz said that british soldiers are helping ukraine launch stormshadow missiles in the fight against the russians. this statement by scholz caused criticism. it was called a gift to

majority of the population is on the side of ukraine, and everything is blocked personally by chancellor scholz and his closest circle, this is the head of the faction of the social democrats mitzenig, there the head of the administration of chancellor schmidt and other people who obviously want to go on the bundestag election campaign next year and say, well... they prevented a nuclear war in europe, and that's why spd must be re-elected, but with regard to macron , of course, in the absence of the leadership of the united states and germany, we hope that some other countries will take over this leadership, but macron demonstrates that he is so militant and active now, well, we we remember that macron has these phases, they replace each other, and he, therefore, goes from statements about... the supply of weapons to phone conversations with putin, we hope that this time this militant phase in him will extend further. which countries are really ready to help and actively in this, the main thing is that these are countries that have direct historical experience with russia, for example, the czec

scholz publicly reassured the german population several times. to be clear, as federal chancellornot be sending soldiers bundeswehr to ukraine. there is a nuance here, in the matter of sending german soldiers, the last word. there are enough deputies of the bundestag, parliamentarians beating the military drum, as well as experts in the country who believe that talk about attacks on the crimean bridge against other targets is absolutely normal. i think it’s completely natural that the kerch bridge was mentioned in the conversation. the point of supplying taurus, which many policy experts, including those from the government coalition, are calling for , is precisely to strike a blow at russian supply routes, command centers and so on. everything to push through supplies to kiev. after the explosion of macron's dangerous statements trying to rule out any possibility of scholz sending troops to ukraine, many in europe are talking about a deep split along the paris-berlin line, and yet, what is the likelihood that this is just a game of good and bad cop, the goal of which the beginnin

let's remember. accusations that were made against federal chancellor olaf scholz, improper handling s that were intended for his personal information, and then some of these documents were confidentially found in a trash heap, actually near the chancellor’s house, we remember this scandal, there were other examples , well, i can say that, for example, on board. plane of the federal chancellor, there was no control over us, well, i was not a journalist with the special services and have nothing to do with it, but any person simply question, did you leave something there? i didn’t leave anything, we just rejoiced at the huge portions that were served to us, but what am i talking about, no german counterintelligence, german did not exercise control over those accompanying the russian delegation, which took advantage of this. by plane, by movement , nothing, we moved freely throughout the cabin of air force one, the air force, germany, this was the ninety-eighth year, there were other examples when senior officials in the system of the german ministry of defense and the german ministry o

one, that is, if... in germany there is a rather weak ruling coalition of the sdp, there is chancellor scholzt scholz’s successor, if they castling, maybe just pistorius, and pistorius got such a good a torpedo on board, that's it this wiretapping, that is, after this his political career would no longer work out, but if it had worked out, he would be a much more dangerous person than scholz, that is , even without holding early elections in germany and or the next ones, they could change chancellor, because scholz is unpopular there against the backdrop of these farmers, strikes, protests, we would have a new person, most likely... defense minister pistorius, who would be responsible for german foreign policy, so this person was dunked a little, that is today at the spd no longer has any prospects of somehow retaining power, most likely they will leave, but the cdu, the csu have risen, this is a party that worked much better with putin, there are fittings or something, that is , in principle, there may be some kind of situation with them bridges will be built, well, faster. confirmation of y

in this situation, i would like to ask chancellor scholz what is the current problem with the supply scholz. the ministry of defense stated that they do not limit ukraine in the use of supplied weapons, however, the finns do not have long-range missiles. but if you consider that the chancellor once... to strike our territory they choose what they think are the most effective means of destruction, they started talking about the possibility of sending nato military contingents to ukraine, but we remember the fate of those who once sent their contingents to the territory of our country, but now the consequences for possible interventionists will be much more tragic. they must ultimately understand that we also have weapons, and they know about it, there are also weapons that can hit targets on their territory, and that they are coming up with everything now, which scares the whole world, that all this really threatens a conflict with the use of nuclear weapons, which means the destruction of civilization. why don’t they understand this, or what? if the answer is taken to be pentagon chi

in this situation, i would like to find out from chancellor scholz what the current problem is with theurus missiles. nobody knows, nobody. finland tried to show an example to the indecisive scholz. the ministry of defense stated that they do not limit it. they are just talking nonsense, but at the same time they themselves choose targets for striking our territory, choose the most effective ones, what they think, means of destruction , they started talking about the possibility of sending nato military contingents to ukraine, but we remember the fate of those who once sent their contingents to the territory of our country, but now the consequences for possible interventionists will be much more tragic, they must in the end finally, understand that we also have weapons, and they know about it, they also have weapons that can hit targets on their territory, and that they are coming up with everything now, which scares the whole world, that all this really threatens... a conflict involving the use of nuclear weapons, which means the destruction of civilization, but they don’t understand a

why does chancellor scholz refuse to supply cruise missiles to kiev, but the military discussed an attackimean bridge. this follows from transcripts of bundeswehr negotiations, which were at the disposal of the editor-in-chief. so he admitted that germany could still transfer taurus missiles to kiev, two batches of about 100 pieces, they will be ready for use in 8 months, it will be necessary to train the ukrainian military, and for a direct strike on the bridge... nothing to transfer to kiev - they are not going to. the focus publication reports that chancellor scholz is literally afraid of the ukrainians, or more precisely , of what they can do with these missiles. for example, to use - a quote, in a way that germany, and generally no one in general, will like. range taurus, let us remind you, is 500 km, which means it is in the zone. the german military is practically discussing deliveries to the ukrainians, who are quite serious about the neo-nazis of modern missiles, but the british are pushing scholz’s tin, bloomberg reports, according to the publication, which... barks at a high-ra

i assured chancellor scholz that our goal in eliminating the remaining terrorist battalions in rafahenabling the civilian population to leave rafah. it is not something that we will do while keeping the population locked in place. in fact, we will do the very opposite. we will enable them to leave because our consideration for reducing and minimising civilian casualties has guided us and will continue to guide us in the future. our correspondent, mark lowen, who is injerusalem, gave us his analysis of the conference. germany's chancellor olaf scholz is keeping the pressure up on binyamin netanyahu over more humanitarian aid getting into gaza, but also over israel's plans to send its military into rafah, in southern gaza, where about 1.4 million gazans are sheltering, more than half of the entire population of the gaza strip. israel seems determined to push into rafah, the prime minister saying earlier in the day that israel is determined to push on to total victory, as he says it, which means an operation in rafah to crush hamas and get the israeli hostages back. but that has met wit

before chancellor scholz reacted with scandal. suho, without any specifics, promised to look into this serious incident. at the same time, judging by the statements of the german authorities, they are not concerned about the content of the recording, but the fact of the leak itself, because there is no doubt about the authenticity of the audio file. repeated the german ministry of defense. about miscalculations and consequences alexander khabarov. german chancellor olaf scholz broke his silence and spoke out about the recording of conversations of high-ranking german military officials, discussed the idea of ​​launching a missile strike on the crimean bridge. while in rome, scholz said that he had given instructions to thoroughly look into everything. this is a very serious issue, so it needs to be done very carefully, very intensely. to quickly clarify, according to information from the bilt publication, as soon as the scandalous recording was published, germany tried to block its distribution on social networks, but a few hours

scholz has the lowest rating of a chancellor in history. ng to all polls, the germans are against increasing arms supplies to ukraine and are in favor of a diplomatic scenario for ending the conflict. that is why scholz chose the strategy of the world chancellor. he is also driven by a deep-seated fear of russia. scholz is guided by the position that russia should not win, and ukraine must not lose. as part of this strategy, kiev is given enough weapons to survive, but not to win. ukraine. is entering a new phase of the war with russia, where it needs to dig, dig, dig, writes the wall street journal, the publication talks about the transition to deep defense in the ssu and the construction of new fortifications in the avdeevka trap. now they have to dig trenches under continuous shelling, ukrainian militants are forced to simultaneously dig in and repel russian attacks, the sss reports. although to build defensive lines began last november, the results of this company are extremely. ukrainian fighters complain about the cramped conditions; t

further, we have recently witnessed facts that have come to light about the confrontation between chancellor scholznd the bundeswehr, about some cunning plans of the bundeswehr, which have now become apparent due to the publication of this audio recording about... defeat russia on the battlefield, we understand this, 24, who reported? who reported? and the european central bank is treating the issue with the utmost caution. compensation and use of russian assets, fearing precisely the reaction, the response of moscow's reaction, that we we can also do the same with european assets on our territory, as is true. we are ready for this, you can do, let’s say, play back, and what measures, how they can affect foreign companies on business partnerships of foreign companies with russian companies that still exist, there have already been comments on this matter, not so long ago minister of finance, anton siluanov, spoke about this, that we will definitely respond, we have examples in the usa and europe, when the private property of a company was confiscated, or rather private property of companies and pri

bridge on the territory of the russian federation, as well as how to do this so that german chancellor scholzll under suspicion, deserves the most serious discussion and response, and therefore, after the return of deputies from the regions, where they are until march 11. we will hear this question at a meeting of the state duma, i also think it’s correct request the bundestag to conduct an investigation. well, in our foreign ministry they asked the question: will the german media pay attention to the information that has appeared, as the official representative of the ministry maria zakharovo noted, journalists have a good reason to prove their independence. our press will contact the german embassy in moscow for comment. it also did not escape zakharov’s attention that the german leadership during the negotiations referred to the experience of the third reich. now about how special operations are going, data from the ministry of defense. behind in a week, our armed forces carried out 23 group strikes with high-precision weapons, multiple launch rocket systems , and drones against objects of

the recent remarks by chancellor olaf scholz i remarks by chancellor olaf scholz about _ remarks by chancellorf scholz about his — remarks by chancellor olaf scholz about hisjustification not to send terrorists. — about hisjustification not to send terrorists, about british soldiers in ukraine, _ terrorists, about british soldiers in ukraine, to what extent are those remarks _ in ukraine, to what extent are those remarks but — in ukraine, to what extent are those remarks put british soldiers at risk miss— remarks put british soldiers at risk miss an _ remarks put british soldiers at risk miss an did — remarks put british soldiers at risk miss an did you suggest in your discussions today, you mentioned long—range weapons, proposal that british— long—range weapons, proposal that british soldiers could programme and supervise _ british soldiers could programme and supervise missiles for the use by ukraine, — supervise missiles for the use by ukraine, or— supervise missiles for the use by ukraine, orare you perhaps supervise missiles for the use by ukraine, or are you perhaps also going _ ukraine,

confused today in the testimony, but i would like to this add to the picture a statement from chancellor scholze german intelligence services... would not know anything about the impending terrorist attack. let's listen to him. german intelligence did not know about the planned attack on moscow, but american services may have had clues. and this part. it is the policy of the government in the usa to warn other countries when they receive such information, they even issued a public warning, it is even more unfortunate that this terrible terrorist attack still happened, this is how to treat the words of chancellor scholz, i i think that in this case he is telling the truth, and again this is not the russian representative telling us, but one of the talking heads of the state department, matthew miller, answering the question, he says that this terrorist attack is definitely not... the united states of america is involved , ukraine and great britain. please note that he does not say: germany, italy, france, australia, and further, listing all the, so to speak, major western players. well, he only

militant rhetoric on talk shows and on television, are not ready to vote on the bills, which chancellor scholz does not like. scholz took this as carte blanche for total authoritarian leadership, and his latest statements where he said, for example, that germany to do... in this way, as i say, because i am kanz, this is absolutely the authoritarian logic of such a small emperor, as he obviously sees himself, mr. sergius, well , let's imagine a bad picture for ourselves on some, some part of the front there is a breakthrough, a further breakthrough, then shoit tries to suddenly summon minsk-3, that 's all, yeah. then minsk-3, then let's persuade putin, yes, yes, that is, scholz is playing the peacemaker again, that is, he is saying, you see, the russians have broken through, and we have offered them a compromise, well and it is always a good idea to offer a compromise, not at their own expense, of course, they try to offer it at the expense of ukraine, so that means finding such a creative moment and a creative solution that is possible there. that is, to suggest, mr. serhiy, that is, we can ta

focus edition reports that chancellor scholz is literally afraid of the ukrainians, or rather of whathese missiles... can do, of course, for example, use the quote in a way that germany, and in general , no one in general, will like. taurs have a long-range range of up to 500 km, which means that in the affected area there will be not only the cities of donbass, but also the belgorod, kursk, bryansk, voronezh regions, krasnodar territory and other regions, not to mention the crimea. that is, it turns out that the military is discussing, but the chancellor is hesitating, just like the deputies of the bundestag. previously they voted against the draft resolution directly calling on the government. the most important thing is that these are not some mythical people with incomprehensible surnames, but these are messrs. graefe, gerhart, fenske, frodststätt, in short, these are real, high-ranking german military officers who, in all seriousness, practically discuss supplies to ukrainian neo-nazis. but the british are pushing for scholz, bloomberg reports. according to the publication, which

however, the taurus case has already turned into major problems for chancellor scholz, who explained long-range missiles by the need to send more bundeswehr employees to ukraine, and this is almost direct. i'll get to russia. berlin is behaving like it was caught red-handed, or is keeping silent; the german ambassador, summoned to the russian foreign ministry, did not talking to journalists, or shaking off preparations for a clash with moscow. it is absolutely clear that such claims that this conversation supposedly proves that germany is preparing for war with russia is absurd, disgusting russian propaganda. and these words are similar to scholz’s attempt to use perhaps the last argument against sending taurus to ukraine, which has been published. the conversation between high-ranking officers is not only a substantive discussion of attacks on the crimean bridge, it is another reason to remember that taurus can fly to the moscow agglomeration, and scholz does not want this. here, of course, it remains to be seen whether the bundeswehr is doing this on their own initiative, then the

the russians. that there will be no nord stream if russia invades, and chancellor scholz said theregreement, did it work? well, as you can see, there is no more nord stream, so the russians have to be careful. at the same time, american military experts are increasingly calling on the authorities to negotiate with russia. former un weapons inspector scott ritter said: moscow has achieved undeniable nuclear superiority over washington, so the west urgently needs to return to the negotiating table. such a threat has not been seen since the civil war; according to tradition, the president has already managed to make a reservation and said that the threat to democracy must be protected. now there is footage from san francisco of a boeing 777 during takeoff, it lost a wheel , look, now you can see this moment, just as the wheel of the plane falls off, it fell into the parking lot, damaged several cars, the fence, there are even such photographs, look, then. .. sold the weight of such a wheel 80 kg, the consequences are very clearly visible, the airline promised to contact the owners of t

chancellor 0laf scholz has been under tremendous pressure to allow cruise missiles to be sent to ukraineetty much rolling it out for the moment which has caused irritation amongst allies including france and the united kingdom but germany getting a bit irritated themselves because they say, we are only second to the us and the amount of arms that have been pledged to ukraine but obviously a very live debate notjust about ukraine but obviously a very live debate not just about what can ukraine but obviously a very live debate notjust about what can be sent to the —— to ukraine but what can be manufactured. i spoke to one defence boss who said he thought it was about ten years before europe would be in a position in terms of its industrial base to being able to defend itself. turning to the us, it's been revealed an ex—fbi informant, who was indicted last month for allegedly fabricating a story about president biden and his son hunter, was called a "liar and a fraudster" in a previous case. cbs correspondent, scott macfarlane, has the details. this shadowy figure named alexander smirnov, a

the russians that there would be no nord stream if russia invaded, and chancellor scholz stated that, as you can see, the nord stream. not anymore, so the russians must be careful. at the same time, american military experts are increasingly calling on the authorities to negotiate with russia. former un weapons inspector scott ritter said: moscow has achieved undeniable nuclear superiority over washington, so the west urgently needs to return to the negotiating table. alika komarova, lead. joe biden delivered his annual state of the union address to congress; at the very beginning of his speech, the american the president said. intends to use us troops in ukraine, while biden emphasized that if congressmen refuse to supply weapons, then kiev will be in real danger. we must support ukraine, supply them with weapons so that they can defend their sovereignty. this is all that ukraine asks for. she's not asking for american soldiers to be sent there, and by the way, i hope it stays that way. so now we must all unite. stand together against russia, history literally follows this, if the u

that he would send, but said that such a possibility should be considered just in case, and chancellor scholzcellor of germany, immediately made it clear that this kind of idea was not suitable for his country, and that they ukraine is not going to fight, suddenly, suddenly, a recording of conversations of several german generals appears. where they discuss the possibility of striking with long- range weapons, including on the crimean bridge. so what happens? it turns out that from the point of view of at least some in the german leadership, the problem is not that such conversations took place, but that such conversations can be imagined using. in general it’s already absolutely monstrous, germany in this case turns out to be a victim, but nothing there’s nothing unusual here, so let’s see what the special representative of the us national security council, admiral john kirby, says about this episode. the publication of the negotiations is a brazen, obvious attempt by the russians to sow discord, to provoke a split, to create the impression that neither the west, nor even the german governme

western leaders were quick to distance themselves from macron's words, especially chancellor scholz, who emphasized that he would never send bundestag soldiers to ukraine. however, the very fact of the statement already says a lot. moreover, macron emphasized, his words are balanced and thought out. this topic was also discussed in europe before, though not publicly. about what, in particular in the interview. vadym prystaiko, ex-ambassador of ukraine to great britain, told rfe/rl. if we run out of strength, run out of soldiers, run out of weapons, which you do not supply us. you will have to make a decision to help us with the armed forces. and there are countries that are approaching this decision. britain is one of the very first on this list. in response, putin took up the old. he is again threatening the west with the use of nuclear weapons. unlike ukraine, the union. at his place not many: belarus, iran and the dprk, but they, unlike the west, act quickly and decisively. in particular, as the minister of defense of south korea, shinwon-sik, said, north korean factories for the

chancellor olaf scholz previously spoke out against the escalation, at least openly, noting the high risk that the ukrainian armed forces will begin to use taurus to attack the russian rear. but is it worth trusting such statements now after the leak of the discussion between bundeswehr officers? france will not send its troops to ukraine to conduct military operations, the minister of foreign affairs of the republic, stephane sejournet, announced this on local radio stations. he added that the citizens of his country, quote: will not die for ukraine. these words contradict the recent statement by the president of the fifth republic about the possible dispatch of nato troops to ukraine. after a sharp reaction to such words, even among france’s allies, macron even had to clarify that he was in perfect health. the west, sent a strong strategic signal to russia, but in the end only exposed the split among western politicians. in the zaporozhye region, fsb officers detained a citizen of ukraine; he was transmitting information to the sbu about dislocation and movement. i had to establish

the day when macron did not rule out nato participation in the ukrainian conflict, german chancellor olaf scholz germany will not transfer the long-range taurus cruise missile to kiev. the decision is final. the taurus cruise missile began to be developed in the mid-nineties. it was a joint german-swedish project between diamler benz air space and the swedish concern bofers. the missile can hit protected command bunkers, ammunition depots, as well as naval targets on distance over 500 km. they can be launched from various platforms, land, sea, and aviation. the main carrier is the f-16 fighter. the length of the rocket is 5 m, the launch weight is more than a ton. it is equipped with a turbojet. engine of small size and thrust, the main part of the flight takes place at low altitude, which makes it difficult for air defense systems to detect it early. the warhead has two charges. the second hits the target. warhead weight - 480 kg. when installing a multi-mode fuse , the missile can be detonated both upon contact with the target and inside it. it is believed that the air force germany has about

we recently witnessed the facts about the confrontation between chancellor scholz and the bundeswehr,lans of the bundeswehr, which became visible after the publication of this audio recording of how they are carefully preparing an attack on the crimean bridge, on other objects, on ammunition depots. and most importantly, they are want to deceive everyone so that the suspicion does not fall on them, on the americans and... the british, this is a frank self-revelation. german chancellor olaf scholz called the alleged leak a very serious matter, and german military counterintelligence has launched an investigation into the incident. the official authenticity of the records made public by russia has not yet been confirmed by the german ministry of defense. i will also note that german chancellor olaf scholz repeatedly opposed the transfer of taurus cruise missiles to ukraine. andres umland, analyst, joins our broadcast of the stockholm center for east european studies. welcome to our broadcast, thank you for joining, good morning, thank you for the invitation, tell us how important you th

now saying that he is ready to even see troops on the territory of ukraine in the future, and chancellor scholzy, such supporters of increasing the supply of arms. now he is trying to behave more than cautiously and it seems to me that this is a story not only about the tauris, what has changed, no, no, well, here i think that the main point is still in the german position, not even in the german position, in the positions of scholz himself, these are cetaurus , look, germany is the second supplier of weapons to ukraine, so this is very good, and it started with helmets and first-aid kits, ends with extremely important, here you know, i think... in relation to taurus, it is ee ot that , well, i would say, that splinter that sits in the heads of all germans, starting with the second, after the end of the second world war. a german soldier must no longer shoot, kill there and so on and so forth. if a german officer sits and directs the taurus to the conditional kaluga there or whatever and so further, this means for scholz that this german officer is participating. in the war, for him it is the s

and chancellor scholz, who until recently was one of the main, i would say, such supporters of increasingweapons to ukraine, is now trying to behave more than cautiously, and it seems to me that this story is not only about tauris. what has changed? no, no, well, here i think after all, the main point, in the german position, not even in the german position, but in the position of scholze himself, is the taurus. look, germany is the second supplier of weapons to ukraine, so this is very good, and it started with helmets and medical kits, ends with extremely important, here you know, i think, in relation to the tauruses, it's uh that's... eh, well, i would said, that splinter that sits in the heads of all germans, starting with the second, after the end of the second world war. a german soldier must no longer shoot, kill there and so on and so forth. if a german officer sits and directs the taurus to the conditional kaluga there or whatever and so on, then for scholz it means that this german officer is participating in the war. for him, this is the very barrier. yes , over which he cannot

german chancellor olaf scholz frankly admitted why he does not want to give long-range taurus missilesraine. during a meeting with the residents of dresden the day before , the bundeschancellor said that to ensure control over the use of these missiles , it would be necessary to send bundeswehr servicemen to ukraine, however, he adds. the head of the german government is excluded and here's his short quote: in our case it would mean that we have to participate in this war, i think it's impossible, that's the end of olaf scholz's quote, well , let's listen to another motivation of the bundeschancellor in his direct speech. the hymars missile launcher is not the most powerful or long-range weapon, but it can do more than the taurus, which... flies up to 500 km. in addition, if taurus is used incorrectly, it can achieve a specific goal somewhere in moscow. well , this is the motivation: russians can go to kyiv they can shoot whatever they want in kharkov, they can fly to lviv, they can fly to transcarpathia, and they can fly to moscow, and valery, the ambassador of ukraine to the united s

i assured chancellor scholz that our goal in eliminating the remaining terrorist battalions in rafahh. it is not something that we will do while keeping the population locked in place. in fact, we will do the very opposite. we will enable them to leave because our consideration for reducing and minimising civilian casualties has guided us and will continue to guide us in the future. after weeks of deadly violence in haiti, police say several gang members have been killed in an operation to clear roadblocks and seize weapons in the capital port—au—prince. the united nations estimates 350,000 people have been displaced by the unrest, adding to an already complex political and security situation. our central america correspondent will grant is one of the first journalists to be able to get into the country and reports now from cap—haitien in the north — where most displaced people have been heading. cap—haitien suffers from almost all of haiti's deepest problems — grinding poverty, chaos, disorder and corruption, but crucially, not gang violence. so it's becoming the main safe haven for

chancellor. scholz, who in the spring of 2022 offered ukraine helmets and sleeping bags, will not dare to supply long-range missiles. a cruise missile with a flight range of 500 km is a weapon that, if used incorrectly, can reach a specific target somewhere in moscow. it is unacceptable that german soldiers, wherever they are, have anything to do with the targets that this system can hit. the fall of avdiyivka showed that, despite heavy losses, the russians are still able to push through the ukrainian defense and push back the front line. there are two key components to their success. the first is the massive use of aviation and shelling of the ukrainians positions with guided aerial bombs. the second is the lack of artillery shells in the armed forces. the majority of military observers are convinced that without increased western support, events at the front will not develop in favor of ukraine. the army lacks not only shells and missiles, but also people. the verkhovna rada is late with updating the

replaced as long as necessary, well , ukrainian ambassador milnik, the same one called german chancellor olaf scholzanges him, as i say this, well, who are you? in the end, well, it won’t be a night to mention and laugh how much all this did not correspond to his appearance and the statements that he made, since, well, he is a poorly educated person, doesn’t even know the terminology, at the end of the film, for example, he... could act without makeup as a leader, and then again, well, now let’s go back to the damn patriot, means of communication, means of energy supply than means. technical support and at least two ammunition loads of missiles , let's sum it up to a billion, why was he so excited, why did he simply demand, because they really have it in the sense that they have no means of struggle, no countermeasures... against our high-explosive aircraft bombs with universal planning and correction modules , there is not a single means of combat, it is impossible to hit it, well, yes, the orthodox cast iron are putting things in order there, they call it at the front, especially an unusually effe

olaf scholz, today in the vatican, however, at a meeting with the pope, the chancellor was again forcedsomething not at all about religion. what the press writes about - this is a very serious question, so now it is being clarified very carefully, very intensively, very quickly. and that’s all scholz said, which, of course, again inflated the level of discontent among the germans. yesterday they hardly understood what game their politicians were playing; today they learned that their military was secretly preparing strikes against russia. germany called self-exposure, we have recently witnessed facts that have come to light about the confrontation between chancellor scholz and the bundeswehr, about some cunning plans of the bundeswehr, which have now become apparent due to publication of this audio recording about how... they carefully prepare an attack on the crimean bridge, on other targets, primarily ammunition depots, and most importantly, how they want to deceive everyone so that they think not about them, about the americans, the british, since they are already there, well, this i

that was 0laf scholz, the german chancellor, had to say.lians trapped during its planned military operation in the city of rafah, where more than a million people are taking refuge. i assured chancellor scholz that our goal in eliminating the remaining terrorist battalions in rafah goes hand—in—hand with enabling the civilian population to leave rafah. it is not something that we will do while keeping the population locked in place. in fact, we will do the very opposite. we will enable them to leave because our consideration for reducing and minimising civilian casualties has guided us and will continue to guide us in the future. let's speak to our correspondent, mark lowen, who is in jerusalem. good evening. it seemed at points during this press conference as if there were polite but firm disagreements with mr netanyahu slightly pushing back against international pressure from one of his closest allies. yes. and i think this is classic netanyahu really to hit back, to dig in when he feels under pressure. he is under pressure here in israel

i assured chancellor scholz that our goal in eliminating the remaining terrorist battalions in rafahrafah. it is not something that we will do while keeping the population locked in place. in fact, we will do the very opposite. we will enable them to leave because our consideration for reducing and minimising civilian casualties has guided us and will continue to guide us in the future. now it's time for a look at today's sport. we'll start with the frenetic fa cup quarter final between manchester united and their rivals liverpool which was eventually won in the 120th minute by manchester united. it was a hard fought 4—3 victory but liverpool were 2—1 ahead at half time. anthony equalised in the 87th minute for united to take the game into extra time. with the match looking like it was heading for penalties at 3—3, 21—year—old amad diallo scored in the 120th minute to send united into the semi finals were they will face coventry city the team show resilience, determination to win this game. we have had so many setbacks so i am really proud of the team, not only in this game but the w

this is the mantra of chancellor scholz, but the criticism against him has especially increased sinceiretapping scandal, especially with. putin started this war to destroy this country. i experienced this myself in ukraine. people are forced to constantly return to basements. this is actually the norm of life, even if the rocket does not arrive. we must study all materials intensively, which can be used for the defense of ukraine. from my point of view, the facts are very, very clear. the purpose of this whole operation is to drive. we do not understand why the german chancellor is using false information, we do not understand whether he is mistaken, or whether he has a special agreement with putin, crimea has great symbolic meaning for putin, he always says: especially if it concerns not just germany’s plans germany should not discuss such things, but britain's participation is absolutely unacceptable. and this feeling spread throughout europe. the allies believe that germany is not fulfilling its obligations. germany accused russia of information war. falters on missile deliveries,

chancellor scholz revealed what many had no doubt about. f missiles supplied to ukraine. scholz discussed his fears regarding the transfer of german taurus missiles to kiev, at the same time he attached allies who saw... the german chancellor as the wrong person. former british defense minister wallis, who was about to leave politics , called scholz’s behavior that from the point of view of european security, he was the wrong person, doing the wrong job and in the wrong place. echoed the head of the parliamentary foreign affairs committee, alicia kearns. scholz's comments are wrong, irresponsible and a slap in the face to allies. we have a choice, either we give ukraine what it needs, or we see even more bloodshed and a complete failure of deterrence. scholz must send the taurus missiles and stop holding back european security. a year ago, when they squeezed germany to agree to supply leopard-2 tanks to ukraine, it got to the point that it is not... generally accepted that by talking about sending troops to ukraine, he set everyone up at onc

the european union as such, many people there simply began to categorically deny it, including chancellor scholzbut mr. macron’s subordinates, including the new foreign minister, began to say that, well, in general, he didn’t quite mean that, and on the other hand, you can send troops there, but they won’t fight, they’ll train, and it won’t necessarily lead... to a war with russia, that is, maybe it will? the very fact of the deployment of troops was recorded, or rather the desire to lead troops, officially, not officially, they are there, without these so-called instructors, ukraine’s long-range weapons could not be used against russian cities, we understand all this perfectly well, and there is a lot of evidence for this. and mr. austin, the secretary of defense, coming out of the hospital, he said that if ukraine is defeated by russia, then nato will have to enter into a fight with russia, there is a quote, it is generally impossible, this is the meaning. as they do now, prohibited by this treaty ground-based missile , but before leaving, they accused us, they said that you had already acquir

german chancellor olaf scholz frankly admitted why he does not want to give long-range taurus missiles to ukraine. during a meeting with... with the residents of dresden the day before, the bundeschancellor said that in order to ensure control over the use of these missiles, it would be necessary to send them to ukraine servicemen of the bundeswehr, however, the head of the german government adds, exclusively. and then his short quote. in our case , this would mean that we must participate in this war. i think it's impossible, that's the end of olaf scholdz's quote. well, further, let's listen to one more motivation. bundeschancellor, in his direct speech. the hymars missile launcher is not the most powerful or long-range weapon, but it can do more than the taurus, which can fly up to 500 km. in addition, if taurus is used incorrectly, it can to reach a specific goal somewhere in moscow. well , it's a kind of motivation, the russians can shoot anything at kyiv, they can shoot at kharkiv. it flies to lviv, it flies to zakarpattia, and it flies to moscow, and this explanation by olaf sch

internal, that is, today in germany there is a rather weak ruling force. the sdp coalition, chancellor scholzolz’s successor, if they castling, may be pistorius, and pistorius received such a good torpedo on board, with this wiretapping, that is, after that he has a career, a political one it wouldn’t work out, but if it did work out, he would be a much more dangerous person than scholz, that is, even without holding elections in germany, early there or the next ones, they could change the chancellor, because scholz is unpopular there against the backdrop of these farmers, strikes, protests, we would have a new person, most likely defense minister pistorius, who would this... the csu is a party that, well, worked much better with putin there. confirmation of your words is that in germany itself they are not so much discussing how the germans are planning attacks on russian territory, but rather discussing the moment, but how this recording in general, who handed this recording over to the russians journalists, andrei petrovich, but russia should somehow respond to this, well, look, a very int

because he was actively helping the ukrainian military plan attacks on russian warships, so chancellor scholz knew exactly what he was talking about. alexander khabarov, ilya mardyukov and vlada tsurkan, lead london. another incident with the us president. joe biden, receiving the italian prime minister at the white house, twice confused the gas sector with ukraine. neither the teleprompter nor the cheat sheet on which he was helped. in the coming days, we, together with our friends from jordan and other countries , will be airdropping additional shipments of food and supplies to ukraine. and we will look for other ways to deliver large volumes of humanitarian cargo to ukraine, including a sea corridor. we also we're going to, we're going to convince israel to... let more trucks through so that more people get the help they need. when biden suddenly said ukraine instead of gas, italian prime minister giorgia meloni, who was sitting next to him, looked at her aides in obvious confusion, trying to understand what it was, then nervously grabbed the sheets of paper with her own speech. at this mo

general, divided their country, its leadership before the whole world, the same world to which chancellor scholzy squint, they say, berlin will not supply taurus to ukraine, because that’s before participation. personal missiles, by the way, means of communication between each other and so on, this gives away what nato is doing, in particular germany, a leader who denies his country’s participation in the war, in the preparation of very specific military actions against our homeland. the crimean bridge for... nato, apparently, is an object of morbid fixation, as scholz likes to say, on both sides of the ocean. the former director of the cia no longer knows what is more transparent hint in order to be heard. if you want to give the russians a break, if you want to interrupt that sense of momentum that they have, why not do something like destroy the bridge over the kerch strait. i think it would have a big impact on the russians, both psychologically and militarily . and in this context, macron’s impromptu talk about sending nato troops into ukraine no longer looks completely fanciful. the allies

chancellor scholz called the incident a very serious problem and promised to quickly investigate everything trying to cover its tracks. dmitry malyshev will continue the topic. despite the fact that a day has passed since the publication of secret negotiations. neither in the bundestag, nor in the bundeswehr. they haven't said anything clear yet. as journalists from the berlin publication write, they sent dozens of requests to all related departments, but in response there was silence. there is even a telephone line in the german foreign ministry suspicious. out of order there are events in which a political interpretation appears almost simultaneously with the event, sometimes even earlier, and there are events that, it would seem, should have the effect of a bomb exploding, but nothing happens, however, the authorities still took the first step, an eloquent step . the bundeswehr insisted on blocking the accounts of the social network x, which distributed a recording of a conversation between german military personnel who discussed the taurus missile attack on the crimean bridge. it's call

are trying to put it into practice, now they seriously want to transfer them to ukraine, well, chancellor scholz is actually undercover, he is the highest agility... a pickpocket, rummaging through the pockets of other countries. news on channel one. hello, on channel one news, andrey ukharev is with you. and let's start with messages from belgorod. one person was killed and two were injured as a result of another barbaric shelling of residential buildings by ukrainian terrorists. a block in the city was apparently targeted, several apartment buildings were damaged, as well as four medical institutions, including an explosion near the perinatal center, all patients had to be urgently evacuated. in addition, one of the shells exploded in the parking lot, several were burned cars, clouds of smoke rise above the city. anna prokofieva is monitoring the situation in belgorod. two arrivals, one after the other, took place in the neighboring courtyards of the residential area. early morning 7:30 there are residential high-rise buildings around. dogs, when a shell fell on the road a few meters from it,

, and what is happening in germany has a direct relationship to the vatican , no matter what chancellor scholze spins and talks about his policy, the words that we need to talk with russia, that we need to talk with russia in terms of what will happen then after the end of the war or special military operation, they come first, here scholz, of course, will try to make full use of the position of the pope, who... and the leader of cinctello, the five star movement, giuseppe conte, addresses the current prime minister. 2 years later, we ask ourselves, and we ask you, what about the bet you made on a military victory over russia? you see, all the forecasts are for a military victory, for the collapse of the russian economy. they failed at the collapse of putin's regime. what have we achieved with this military strategy? death, destruction, went into debt to send more and more weapons to the bitter end for endless escalation. and you deserve as a prize a kiss on the head for your loyalty. the best conditions for ukraine. this is the only way you did not want to admit in our name to avoid the third

not mean and does not mean green light on the use of taurus missiles either on the part of chancellor olaf scholzstand. overheard recorded this conversation, this highly confidential dialogue took place over an unsecured line, the security policy chancellors are stunned and demand an exhaustive investigation. this conversation probably should never have become public. military counterintelligence is currently investigating whether the tapped officers may have violated security rules by using an unsecured line. according to the dpa news agency, they used a communication application for their conversation. scholz continued his program visit to rome, but he knows that many uncomfortable questions await him at home in germany. scholz justifies his negative decision. about the supply of taur with the direct participation of german soldiers in the russian-ukrainian conflict. the opposition does not rule out the creation investigative commission and questions the trustworthiness of the chancellor. the federal chancellor is now even more discredited as it has become clear that he misinformed the public.