i'm here with charlie thomas with the council of community housing organizations and proponent of proposition e. thank you. >> thank you for having me. >> we're joined by corey smith from the housing action coalition and an opponent of the measure. >> good morning. >> thank you both for being here. i would like to start with charlie. why do you believe this proposition is so important? >> proposition e housing our families and workers is an opportunity for san francisco really to set on the right path to achieve the affordability we need to serve our workforce and house working families. all of us are touched by the afford ability crisis where we're working family in the sunset or fillmore or china town, bay view, we all experienced that pressure and that's happening because over the last number of years, san francisco has far exceeded the production of high and luxury housing. we've built more than 51% of our state mandated goals but when it comes to affordable housing, we're short and reached less than 50% of our affordable housing goals so san franciscans are priced out. it means the next

the series of, as charlie put, including charlie thomas, micro climates of religious freedom. more broadly, the history of the mighty i am suggests important truths about american religion. financial practices are religious practices. giving money could have just as much significance as saying a prayer for burning incense. the addition of a financial elements attracts the unwelcome attention of outsiders. it invites government officials to sit in judgment on whether these kinds of exchanges are legitimate. whether there is a fair exchange going on between donor and recipient. political history of religious freedom and religious pluralism, which we are discussing here, requires attention to these kinds of financial exchanges. it is in these areas did the meaning of religious freedom, and religious pluralism is often been hammered out. thank, you and i'm looking forward to the conversation. [applause] >> thank you to all three of you. it was very fun to read through your papers and advance, and then to hear them again. i had written of comments, and now i have all of this additi

i'm here with charlie thomas with the council of community housing organizations and proponent of proposition >> thank you for having me. >> we're joined by corey smith from the housing action coalition and an opponent of the measure. >> good morning. >> thank you both for being here. i would like to start with charlie. why do you believe this proposition is so important? >> proposition e housing our families and workers is an opportunity for san francisco really to set on the right path to achieve the affordability we need to serve our workforce and house working families. all of us are touched by the afford ability crisis where we're working family in the sunset or fillmore or china town, bay view, we all experienced that pressure and that's happening because over the last number of years, san francisco has far exceeded the production of high and luxury housing. we've built more than 51% of our state mandated goals but when it comes to affordable housing, we're short and reached less than 50% of our affordable housing goals so san franciscans are priced out. it means the next generation com

ginni thomas we learned over the summer was deeply involved in that very effort, working to encourage fake electors all over the country, including in arizona. we're back with luke, harry and charliebout the supreme court decision. >> really simple. all they want is the records of her phone calls and all she said was i have a first amendment right not to give them to you. it's a very weak claim. it's just about the numbers themselves, and they're doing an important ongoing investigation. the news is i think, as you said, nicolle, that two of the justices not only would have said the case has merit but they would have granted a stay, which requires among other things finding she probably would have won. that is foreboding for future litigation involving the january 6th committee. it's also, given what you said about ginni thomas, about the closest that we've come to the kind of -- her personal involvement and a stronger claim for justice thomas to recuse. that's the headline. but 7-2 gave it the kind of back of hand that it deserved. >> i mean, if justice thomas had voted to allow the phone records, i'm not sure that a million reporters would want to know the answer to the followin