the gharb of this group believes that the gharb chatham house says, why do they feel threatened? why do they do it? see why england says this, but america does not say this, the war that is going on in gaza. financial war, world financial war, war for power finance, we have something in england called the city of london. it is 29 square kilometers in the middle of london . my flag is separate. the laws of everything are separate. all the financial laws of the british are determined by it. it determines all the money of the world's people. it kills you, as an oligarch, today from iran. for example, take out a billion dollars, you can't go anywhere, it doesn't give laws anywhere in the world, but london tells you, come on, mr. tlim blair , when he was the prime minister, made a law called the golden visa for anyone who is one. bring millions of shillings, not only accommodation and other things you can take it from london, i went many days and one of them is to be thrown from my balcony. in london, there is an area where esmad exists because all the oligarchs are there. the english

so some people say that speech on islam phobia was given about an hour after chatham house. ? did a house. what happened? did a magpie come down and pinch his poppy? magpie come down and pinch his poppy? did it fall out by magic? well, maybe the leader of the opposition is not quite as straightfonnard as he would always have you believe. now, in always have you believe. now, in a moment , always have you believe. now, in a moment, i'm going to be joined by a former prime minister of iceland , the youngest ever prime iceland, the youngest ever prime minister of iceland. and there are many things to talk about. but you know what they kept their 200 mile trip boreal fishing rights after they beat us in the cod wars back in the 19705. us in the cod wars back in the 1970s. and they never , ever join 1970s. and they never, ever join the common market, let alone the european union. could we have learned some lessons from iceland? little iceland a little bit earlier . it's time for talking pints. i am joined by sigmundur gunnlaugsson. i may even have pronounced that correctly. forme

so some people say that speech on islam phobia was given about an hour after chatham house. ? did a house. what happened? did a magpie come down and pinch his poppy? magpie come down and pinch his poppy? did it fall out by magic? well, maybe the leader of the opposition is not quite as straightfonnard as he would always have you believe. now, in always have you believe. now, in a moment , always have you believe. now, in a moment, i'm going to be joined by a former prime minister of iceland , the youngest ever prime iceland, the youngest ever prime minister of iceland. and there are many things to talk about. but you know what they kept their 200 mile trip boreal fishing rights after they beat us in the cod wars back in the 19705. us in the cod wars back in the 1970s. and they never , ever join 1970s. and they never, ever join the common market, let alone the european union. could we have learned some lessons from iceland? little iceland a little bit earlier . it's time for talking pints. i am joined by sigmundur gunnlaugsson. i may even have pronounced that correctly. forme

i have just set it three _ chatham house. i have just set it three or— chatham house.r of the party to— important, it is myjob as leader of the party to assess how we enforce and bring _ the party to assess how we enforce and bring about collective responsibility and will do so, but i have _ responsibility and will do so, but i have set— responsibility and will do so, but i have set out my position clearly. i am not _ have set out my position clearly. i am not doing so in accordance with particular— am not doing so in accordance with particular views that individual members of the labour party may or may members of the labour party may or nfay not— members of the labour party may or may not take. i do think that should be the _ may not take. i do think that should be the priority. the priority is to -et be the priority. the priority is to get change _ be the priority. the priority is to get change in the situationjust be the priority. the priority is to get change in the situation just as quickly— get change in the situation just as quickly as— get change in the situat

now no me by you, all cough is middle east and the list, the chatham house in london, we asked her if she thinks is well, has a clear objective nga. a clear objective? yes, i think they do. the problem is, um that, um, how realistic is it? the clear objective is to try to eliminate the owner of how mazda is military capability and to insure the time of the will no longer be able to govern garza and that no organization with the similar ideology to them. last will be able to govern goals. i think that's been the objective right from the start the problem and of course, to bring the 239 hostages boxes. and it is day $37.00 of the the will, and $37.00 days with very little information is any on the hostages plus 40, missing the genuine lives there and also the to ashes. so i think the angel quite clear from the is there any point of view? so the question is, the, how to achieve them without a political humanitarian and the humanitarian does often. and i think that's a challenge that seems impossible to achieve. that was nicholas analyst. know me by jacqueline speaking to us alia. all rig

dimensions of the conflicts. joining me now is know me vari, a cough and middle east analyst at chatham house in london. thanks so much for joining us now, looking at the new lead testing. thank you. watching, you know, for having me on this, you're watching these latest developments and gaza. would you say that israel has a clear objective at this stage? a clear objective? yes. i think they do. the problem is um that, um, how realistic is it? the cleaner objective is to try to eliminate all of her mazda is military capability and to insure the time of the will no longer be able to govern garza and that no organization with the similar ideology to the last will be able to government goals. i think that's been the objective right from the start the problem and of course, to bring the 239 hostages back and uh, it is day 37 of the tool and 37 days with very little information is any on the hostages plus 40 missing the dead or alive if they're in golf. oh um the to ashes. so i think the angel quite clear from the is there any point of view um the question is the how to achieve them without a poli

international committee of the red cross, the well known me by eoc of is a middle list analyst at chatham house in london. we us to, if she thinks israel has a clear objective in casa a clear objective. yes, i think they do. the problem is um that, um, how realistic is it? the cleaner objective is to try to eliminate the owner of how mazda is military capability and to insure the time of the will no longer be able to govern garza and that no organization with the similar ideology to the last will be able to government goals. i think that's been the objective right from the start the problem and of course, to bring the 239 hostages boxes. and it is day 37 of the will and 37 days with very little information. if any on the hostages plus 40, missing the dead or alive if they're in golf, so the 2 ashes, so i think the angel quite clear from the is there any point of view um the question is the how to the chief of them without a political humanitarian and the humanitarian does often and i think that's a challenge that seems impossible to achieve what's medalist unless know me by eoc of speaking to u

setting out what the labour position is in full and recognising what kier starmer said in his chatham house that amendment will mean we can all bunny around that labour amendment and vote for it tomorrow. we around that labour amendment and vote for it tomorrow.— vote for it tomorrow. we are having technical issues _ vote for it tomorrow. we are having technical issues trying _ vote for it tomorrow. we are having technical issues trying to _ vote for it tomorrow. we are having technical issues trying to speak - vote for it tomorrow. we are having technical issues trying to speak to l technical issues trying to speak to the conservative mp martin vickers but will keep trying. the billionaire russian oligarch roman abramovich who, for years, enjoyed a high—profile life in the uk, including the ownership of chelsea football club, has spent much of the past two decades denying his links with the russian president vladimir putin. those denials continued even after he was sanctioned by the uk and the eu council last year, but not the us, for his proximity to the russian leader and for allegedly p

dr christopher sabatini is a senior fellow for latin america at chatham house, the foreign affairs think tank. also professor at lse. welcome to you. can he do all that he promised the electorate? it is you. can he do all that he promised the electorate?— the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all. — the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as _ the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you _ the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you said - the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you said very i first of all, as you said very correctly, he does not have a majority in congress, he only has seven senators, his party has a 38 in the 257 seats in the chamber of deputies and provincial governors. but the second point is also he reallyjust but the second point is also he really just lacked but the second point is also he reallyjust lacked the temperament really just lacked the temperament of reallyjust lacked the temperament of negotiation and compromise. he is not a politician. that is what attracted him to the majority of voters who were angry and fed up wit

recognising the changes taking place in the two weeks since he delivered his big speech on this at chatham housenguage is designed to win over all those labour frontbenchers who want a ceasefire right now. the labour leadership is very nervous, lots of conversations today and the reason they are nervous as they expect an snp amendment tomorrow calling for an immediate ceasefire. labour will be hoping it's amendment will knock out the snp won, but the snp are absolutely confident there amendment will be called because day three of voting or making speeches for the third party and the snp are party. thank you very much. —— the snp are third party. well, we've managed to sort our technical gremlins with conservative mp martin vickers, so let's return to our top story — suella braverman�*s blistering attack on prime minister rishi sunak and the judgement on the legality of the government's rwanda scheme due tomorrow morning. thank you, we have finally managed to get through to you. can ijust begin with suella braverman�*s letter, she said of rishi sunak he was lacking in qualities of leadership, he

axis, the middle east analyst with the royal institute of international affairs, also known as chatham house in london. and uh south of asking, what will the, what the trip priorities will be in the rebuilding garza? it good afternoon. i think obviously when you look at your watch list of guys of the, you know, the massive above mental photographs of the dysfunction there. but no dodge, when you have hundreds of thousands of people, probably 700000 people in this place. many, many houses the storage costs because now under foot goes. so they, they, they meet, it's almost a month. and when they told me, am i saving you money to an age just to ensure that people have shuttle people, efforts, sanitation, air, water and, and the rest. this will be in the immediate austin months then also to ensure that people have to enjoy security. and then gradually moving into the building of guys and, and, and showing that also there is governors so easily is governing does are unique. you need some sort of government, assuming this from us won't be able to govern. and these are the ones, least of all the pe

why they are pushing this narrative no matter what, on on the side of israel, and he spoke at chatham house yesterday, trying to clarify his position on it all, and this is institution that is funded by the us state department, the uk foreign office as well as lockhead martin, bae systems and the like, absolutely, but he was met by a croud outside as well, you know, sort of. knowing that you know no matter what everyone is saying again we know the truth and we're there to sort of call it out so that is another thing and people on high level are actually acting and taking steps not just in the uk but we have the next one where the director of the un's new york office resigned after 30 years and not just that you know leaving very very um i would say letter which really does not hold back and if anyone has a chance please go... and look at it and read it cuz it's very clear what he says and how many years they've been fighting and he just could not take it any longer where he you know this cannot be blindsited anymore so he had to step down and that was a real stance to the feeling of lot of

your see michael darky is a, is with the royal institute of international affairs, also known as chatham house in london. now 1st, please tell me about the day off to what will be the priorities in rebuilding garza a good afternoon thing. obviously when you look at your watch list of guys of the, you know, the massive above mental photographs of the dysfunction there. but no dodge, when you are hundreds of thousands of people, probably $700000.00 people displace many, many houses the storage costs because now under foot goes. so they, they, they mean it's almost a month that would need for what am i saving you money? 78, just to ensure that your collection of people, efforts, sanitation, air, water, and the rest. this will be in the immediate austin month, then also to ensure that people have to enjoy security. and then gradually moving into the building of guys and, and showing that also there is governors so easily. so is government guys are unique, you need some sort of government assuming that's how much won't be able to govern. and these are the ones because a lot of people come last is,

that's why they are pushing this narrative no matter what on on the side of israel and he spoke at chatham house yesterday trying to clarify his position on it all and this is institution that is funded by the us. state department, the uk foreign uh office as well as lock heat martin, bae systems and the like, absolutely, but he was met by a croud outside as well, you know sort of knowing that you know no matter what everyone is saying, again we know the truth and we're there to sort of call it out, so that is another thing, and people on high level are actually acting and taking steps, not just in the uk, but we have the next one where the director of the un's new york office resigned after 30 years. and not just that, you know, leaving very, very um, i would say letter, which really does not hold back, and if anyone has a chance, please go and look at it and read it, cuz it's very clear what he says and how many years they've been fighting and he just could not take it any longer where he you know this cannot be blindsighted anymore, so he had to step down, and that was a real stance to the fe

and the road ahead and in london. far um, mostly me, research fellow on him and at the gulf at chatham house. he joins us from london. thank you all for being with us on inside story me, ron in the hi fi can start with you with the whole fees. i believe, as we've heard, have launch ms side and drone attacks against israel since october. the 7th. how much of an escalation does the c caesar of this congo ship in the southern red sea represent was represents a significant development in that um, the so called resistance front made up of the wrong. it's for axis who sees moss and hezbollah would like to engage in a relatively low intensity conflict with is in which there's a standing war arrive, christian, and the cost of the complex for is a bar increasingly right. so that of so it's, it's a significant development of course, we have to wait and see what the next set of circumstances and the next developments are how things will unfold over the next couple of days. but certainly it does not bode well for region. why tensions, how do you think these strategies might respond to me on, as well, th

as keir starmer set out in his speech at chatham house, it would freeze the conflict.ant the opportunity to do.

and chatham said at the chatham house said at the current , looking at current current, looking at currentence , extreme weather events science, extreme weather events happen simultaneously in our food baskets around one in every thousand years and chatham house, which i think hopefully you agree, is a fairly respectable think tank . they now respectable think tank. they now estimate by 2040 extreme weather events will be happening simultaneously in our food baskets and then think through the consequences of that for poor people within food inflation. i'm one of the worst inflation. >> i'm going to ask you one final question. very short answer. do you think the cop helps or hinders your campaigning? if the failure is a failure? okay, there we go. thank you to donna. coming up, can you guess how many migrants have in uk? and have gone missing in the uk? and those attention those of you paying attention earlier will already know the answer. and don't forget, we'll be asking all important be asking the all important question. is it time for pints be asking the all important quchampagne time f

later removed his poppy chatham house later removed his poppy there are, of course, to rememberlen heroes whilst addressing british muslims and the mysterious case of the missing poppy. agatha christie . eat your heart out . christie. eat your heart out. i've got a spare one here if you want it. labour have said the absence of a poppy for that video was not in any way intentional poppycock that the man who would like to be our next prime minister should so readily yield to the mob and discard the memory of our war deadin discard the memory of our war dead in order to placate one particular community. he tells you everything you need to know about his character, about his values , and about what kind of values, and about what kind of leader he would be. i fear he would lead us into what is becoming a civil war where we are either one country with one set of values and one set of laws, or we are not. you can't have it both ways. who runs britain at the moment? no one. and that's the problem . i'm your and that's the problem. i'm your reaction ? mark at gb news dot reaction? mark a

later removed his poppy chatham house later removed his poppy there are, of course, to remembern heroes whilst addressing british muslims and the mysterious case of the missing poppy. agatha christie . eat your heart out . christie. eat your heart out. i've got a spare one here if you want it. labour have said the absence of a poppy for that video was not in any way intentional poppycock that the man who would like to be our next prime minister should so readily yield to the mob and discard the memory of our war deadin discard the memory of our war dead in order to placate one particular community. he tells you everything you need to know about his character, about his values , and about what kind of values, and about what kind of leader he would be. i fear he would lead us into what is becoming a civil war where we are either one country with one set of values and one set of laws, or we are not. you can't have it both ways. who runs britain at the moment? no one. and that's the problem . i'm your and that's the problem. i'm your reaction ? mark at gb news dot reaction? mark at

and from a studio in london, you'll see mecca berg and associate fellow at chatham house with specializes in the is really policy needed conflicts. thank you for joining us on inside story deanna . let me start with you a full day humanitarian pause. it's a truce not a ceasefire. is this a positive step, a load? any, any, a block of is rarely bombs. the stopping of this rarely bombs is a good thing. that's not the problem. the problem is the bigger picture, which is that is really these really army is going to remain in the gaza strip. they've already indicated that people won't be able to get back to the north, which means effectively the cleansing and it. a didn't mean that we've addressed the root causes, so it's always good for is really bombs to, to stop being dropped on the heads of palestinians and take care of housing children. but i think we need to look deeper and broader than that and start looking at what it is that israel was intending to do, which is to simply ethnically cleanse the gaza strip. and that is the part that needs to stop. all right, let me get your thoughts. you

as keir starmer set out in his speech at chatham house, it would freeze the conflict.time, it risks allowing hamas to regroup and to perpetuate further terrible atrocities that they've said they want the opportunity to do. but that humanitarian pause, to allow for extra time to get into, for aid to get into gaza is in line with what the us are calling for as well. i think it's achievable. not only is it achievable but i think it is essential so that we can alleviate that suffering, get more aid in and make sure that we don't see children as the innocent victims of this conflict. live now to westminster and our political correspondent damian grammaticas. just talk to us about imran hussain�*s position in the comments he has been making. 50. hussain's position in the comments he has been making.— he has been making. so, what was interesting — he has been making. so, what was interesting is _ he has been making. so, what was interesting is this _ he has been making. so, what was interesting is this came _ he has been making. so, what was interesting is this came out - he

galip dalay, is an associate fellow at the chatham house middle east and north africa programme.ope, so that turkish president always has some leverage over his european allies. to think he might be tempted to use it to for some change on the east policy? it to for some change on the east oli ? ~ ., �* ~' policy? well, i don't think right now the migration _ policy? well, i don't think right now the migration is _ policy? well, i don't think right now the migration is an - policy? well, i don't think right i now the migration is an important topic, but it's not a pressing topic for either side at this stage, so i'm not sure whether this can play a significant role to change either side's policy of the middle east because on the middle east, particularly on the conflict, both sides had very strong positions whereas germany has been almost has been very much the palestinian side and the plight of the palestinian side, and both policy seems to be, even though there is room for pragmatism from i don't think it alone will change either side policy because at this stage at the domestic

now i listen to the speech live chatham house. i speech live at chatham house.speech you know, you have to speech and you know, you have to measure your audience. that wasn't speech where wasn't the kind of speech where you big oratorio delivery. you do a big oratorio delivery. it was a short and reasoned speech outlining his position. but his feet to but he has to nail his feet to the now. he can't budge. the floor now. he can't budge. >> absolutely. has to >> absolutely. yeah he has to now. now he set the now. he's now he set out the position clearly. i think you're absolutely now absolutely right. it is. now what party needs to do is it what the party needs to do is it needs to give keir the space to show the leadership that he needs. look, we needs. and look, frankly, we cannot virtually cannot have people virtually signalling whether they're mayors councillors. mayors or councillors. >> true. might >> well, that's true. it might have speech, but have been a decent speech, but those outside didn't those waiting outside didn't think they? those waiting outsid

now i listen to the speech live chatham house. i speech live at chatham house.speech you know, you have to speech and you know, you have to measure your audience. that wasn't speech where wasn't the kind of speech where you big oratorio delivery. you do a big oratorio delivery. it was a short and reasoned speech outlining his position. but his feet to but he has to nail his feet to the now. he can't budge. the floor now. he can't budge. >> absolutely. has to >> absolutely. yeah he has to now. now he set the now. he's now he set out the position clearly. i think you're absolutely now absolutely right. it is. now what party needs to do is it what the party needs to do is it needs to give keir the space to show the leadership that he needs. look, we needs. and look, frankly, we cannot virtually cannot have people virtually signalling whether they're mayors councillors. mayors or councillors. >> true. might >> well, that's true. it might have speech, but have been a decent speech, but those outside didn't those waiting outside didn't think they? those waiting outsid

for more on this joining me now is drjie yu, senior research fellow on china at the think tank chatham house for being with us on the programme, and i'm looking up the agenda and there are just four hours set aside for the meeting of the two world leaders. the white house already playing down expectations of what they may achieve but this is an important meeting nonetheless and what will they be discussing or talking about?— what will they be discussing or talkin: about? , ., , , . talking about? obviously the white house has played _ talking about? obviously the white house has played down _ talking about? obviously the white house has played down the - house has played down the expectation and really from the chinese side, the key word is stability. obviously both sides want to achieve that sense of stability to achieve that sense of stability to prevent the relations to go into a downward spiral. given that the news mentioned regarding the thorny issues from technology to tie one, and most fundamental issues on those, there's very little inch that either side can give away whereas on the

let's speak to nomi bar—yaacov from the international affairs think tank chatham house. cani can i startnternational pressure we have seen from the eu, from nato and from president biden. mil from the eu, from nato and from president biden.— from the eu, from nato and from president biden. all talking about the need and _ president biden. all talking about the need and wish _ president biden. all talking about the need and wish to _ president biden. all talking about the need and wish to see - president biden. all talking about the need and wish to see this - the need and wish to see this current truce extended. in your mind, what needs to happen for that to take effect on both sides? i think it is imperative that the truce is extended for maybe four days at a time, that is the current discussion. they are discussing an extension of four days, in terms of the agreement, for every day that the agreement, for every day that the truce is extended, i would call it a ceasefire, hamas will release ten hostages and israel will release 30 palestinian prisoners. in order for it to happen, the mai

across the critical in emerging technology sphere, as well as trilateral government counterparts at chatham houseinsights on how aukus can help us to break down these old silos to fully harness and power, the power of increased collaboration. my biggest take away was that having a diversity of voices is going to be key to make the partnership all it can be. as our australian colleagues often say, this is only going to work if the enterprise is whole of nation on all sides. i also think it will be critical to channel the insight of our best and brightest in industry while in london i conferred with some of the world's most foremost expert on quantum technology. they provided key insights about the need to think about not just the advanced capabilities that we produce today with the education system that produces the experts of tomorrow. we must think about how we are having linkages between educational workforce developed systems to ensure that we meet the moment for aukus, creating a truly organic and innovative ecosystem among our three countries. the education realm provides in this opportunity

dr christopher sabatini is a senior fellow for latin america at chatham house, the foreign affairs thinkfirst of all, as _ the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you _ the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you said - the electorate? it is doubtful. first of all, as you said very i first of all, as you said very correctly, he does not have a majority in congress, he only has seven senators, his party has a 38 in the 257 seats in the chamber of deputies and provincial governors. but the second point is also he reallyjust but the second point is also he really just lacked but the second point is also he reallyjust lacked the temperament really just lacked the temperament of reallyjust lacked the temperament of negotiation and compromise. he is not a politician. that is what attracted him to the majority of voters who were angry and fed up with the system, but he really doesn't have the temperament. so waving around a chainsaw he is probably not too keen on negotiating. but alas, he has never said how he will take

but he gave the chatham house speech two weeks ago, some labour, one labour amendment, but that hasn'tin his within his party. >> my question is, is this just just the beginning or will essentially this be it? well i think we'll know very soon. >> it's a defined moment. and i think we saw even in opposition, which seems strange because you can't pass any laws. but for ed miliband , the syria vote several miliband, the syria vote several years ago was a defining moment as well. and miliband never as well. and ed miliband never became minister. keir became prime minister. keir starmer lead in the starmer has got this lead in the polls depending on polls and he knows, depending on how he be how things work, he could be prime minister than 12 prime minister in fewer than 12 months. so he had to set a clear moral direction, which which he's to do, essentially. >> it really is >> so i mean, it really is a it's about courage and leadership for him, isn't it? yeah. >> and i do understand i think all parliamentarians are acting according to their conscience and in a different and some end up in

but he gave the chatham house speech two weeks ago, some labour, one labour amendment, but that hasn'tin his within his party. >> my question is, is this just just the beginning or will essentially this be it? well i think we'll know very soon. >> it's a defined moment. and i think we saw even in opposition, which seems strange because you can't pass any laws. but for ed miliband , the syria vote several miliband, the syria vote several years ago was a defining moment as well. and miliband never as well. and ed miliband never became minister. keir became prime minister. keir starmer lead in the starmer has got this lead in the polls depending on polls and he knows, depending on how he be how things work, he could be prime minister than 12 prime minister in fewer than 12 months. so he had to set a clear moral direction, which which he's to do, essentially. >> it really is >> so i mean, it really is a it's about courage and leadership for him, isn't it? yeah. >> and i do understand i think all parliamentarians are acting according to their conscience and in a different and some end up in

security adviser for clinton and obama, mara rudman, and nomi bar—yaacov, an associate fellow at chatham houses happening? are hamas arguing with other groups to take hostages? the tra . ed other groups to take hostages? iie: tragedy of this case other groups to take hostages? ii9: tragedy of this case is that other groups to take hostages? ii9 tragedy of this case is that they were supposed to be released today. kfir was taken when he was nine months and clearly the most vulnerable among the hostages. it has now become apparent that hamas are not holding them. so the israeli army announced today that another group is holding them in the khan yunis area in the southern part of the gaza strip, but there are a lot of worrying questions about their whereabouts and their fate. mara, one of the other _ whereabouts and their fate. mara, one of the other stories _ whereabouts and their fate. mara, one of the other stories is - whereabouts and their fate. mara, one of the other stories is that - one of the other stories is that they were not on the list. whether they were not on the list. whether they

and someone like in the chatham house speech , keir starmer did house speech, keir starmer did settingn agree it because it is agree with it because it is obviously dangerous to change tack on something like international affairs. >> on the one hand >> i suppose on the one hand you're right, at least lesoma hasn't done a u—turn on this . hasn't done a u—turn on this. you stood by his you know, he's stood by his guns, some would say is guns, which some would say is a rare pity. do you think, though, this this, this this tabled amendment , this vote will have amendment, this vote will have any impact? and what's the point of it? i mean, it will obviously damage party. will damage damage the party. it will damage starmer. he would like to whip them not do this. but what them to not do this. but what are trying to do? well, are they trying to do? well, just voters just appease the voters of a certain demographic, say the muslim their seats. so muslim voters in their seats. so obviously we've had king's obviously we've had the king's speech week. speech within the last week. >> i understand

he is, sir keir starmer giving a speech at chatham house on the same day as his islamophobia video wasnd yet, obviously he's wearing a poppy that good patriotic leader of the opposition. well, eagle eyed viewers have spotted that despite wearing the very same suit or what appears to be anyway, starmer appears to have removed his poppy before filming his message for the muslim community. i wonder why now ? we community. i wonder why now? we contacted the labour press office today to get some answers, but unfortunately they refused to provide an official response . so tonight i'm asking response. so tonight i'm asking do you believe the labour party is proud to be british? let me know your thoughts. email me gb views at gb views .com. tweet me at gb news. and while you're there, make sure you vote in our poll. i'll bring you the results very shortly. but to debate this now, i'm joined by former labour mp danczuk and the former mp simon danczuk and the former labour aide . we've got salah labour aide. we've got salah chan kido. so thank you very much, both of you. and right, simon, i'll s

keir starmer has obviously set up the labour party's position as part of the chatham house speech thatnd fuel, but also to have the civilian protection measures put in place as well, and space for negotiation around hostage releases well. we must leave it there, but thanks forjoining us this morning, not least because i know you have to — off to your local remembrance service in your constituency there in castleford. that's taking out of the scene of our national remembrance. —— lets take you out of the scene of our national remembrance. for more than 100 years, military veterans have beenjoined by members of the royal family, politicians and senior military figures at the cenotaph in whitehall. sophie raworth is there for us. good morning from the cenotaph, were almost 10,000 people are getting ready on horse guards parade to come out shortly and take their places in whitehall ahead of this morning's march past. old and young taking part, among them about a dozen world war ii veterans, the youngest now in their late 905. you can see some members of the public have been queueing since

mekelberg is from the middle east and nonh is from the middle east and north africa program at chatham houseme ask you, first of all, how you read it about this suggestion that war crimes have been committed by both hamas and israel . by both hamas and israel. >> good afternoon. thank you for having me . having me. >> it has to be investigated and eventually there are criteria how war is conducted and how it's not conducted. >> and it would be very difficult to assume that in this war no war crimes have been committed considering the level of violence, the level of casualties, death . casualties, death. >> i would be surprised . i'm not >> i would be surprised. i'm not an international lawyer, but i look at the pictures and the images and i'll be very surprised by the end of the war. the conclusion won't be that that war crimes have been committed . committed. >> it is the un getting stuck in a situation whereby by this organisation has been accused by the israeli government of being too much on the side of hamas , too much on the side of hamas, trying to equate a democratic country defendin

as the leader of the opposition set out to chatham house, we must move to a false cessation of fightinglity is that neither the long term security of israel nor long term justice for palestine can be delivered by bombs and bullets. we must seek a path to a political process that leads to two states a secure israel and an independent palestine. thank you, mr minister. >> thank thank you, mr speaker. >> thank thank you, mr speaker. >> well, i thank the honourable gentleman for his comments. >> perhaps i should start with his comments about the foreign secretary. i would say this to him. i think that having a former prime minister and party leader as our foreign secretary , leader as our foreign secretary, wherever you sit in this house, that must be a plus. they will they they will be able they will be able to exert british influence , british policy highly influence, british policy highly effectively overseas. and i greatly welcome the appointment of lord cameron to the position as foreign secretary. he is, as the house will know, an extremely experienced parliamentarian and i have no do

and in a chatham house speech this week , sir keir rejected that there were divisions over the party'se. >> and while i understand led calls for a ceasefire at this stage, i do not believe that it is the correct position. now for two reasons. >> one, because a ceasefire always freezes any conflict in the state where it currently lies . and as we speak, that lies. and as we speak, that would leave hamas with the infrastructure and the capability to carry out the sort of attack we saw on october the 7th. our current calls for pauses in the fighting for clear and specific humanitarian purposes and which must start immediately, is right in practise as well as principle . practise as well as principle. >> but of course, if you do have a ceasefire or a pause in the fighting, you disarm israel and rearm hamas. so what's going on with his party? i mean, if you were teetering on the edge and thinking of switching your vote to labour, this is a taste of things to come. whilst it's true the party are in power and the tory party are in power and have done dismal job in have done a dismal job in of