chelsea manning released 700,000 documents. that was probably in the scope of what was larger. real-time nature of the information potentially reveals sources and methods of intelligence gathering in the u.s. and provides information to the russians on munitions and other battlefield taccs with supply of ukraine by other countries. it also impacts to the extent they lack confidence in the u.s. ability to keep secrets. if the court does get convicted, it has to look at the gravity of the offense. >> the criminal court. >> it will be a civilian court, charged in the district of massachusetts. >> it would be a jury trial, but you've had classified information -- >> it is very complicated and it will cause -- if he wants to go to trial, looking at the chelsea manning case. between the time of her charge and trial was three years. that is because of the complexity of getting this information classified, making sure the court staff has security clearance, and coming up with ways of preventing the information without disclosing more infmation. it has not previously been disclosed. a l

with chelsea manning, remember that she was prosecuted in the military system, right now this appearsgh the civilian system, but with chelsea manning they also raised a separate charge with respect to aiding the enemy. i don't see that happening here, partially because in this case, like chelsea manning or say edward snowden, it was deliberate that they wanted to disseminate this to the public writ large, to the entire world, and they wanted to do it through the media. with this individual he was just showing off in a discord chat. it was still an intentional and deliberate leak, but it was not in the same context based of the facts we know right now. i don't see some of those judges being considered. there were a lot of other people in that chat, so what is the liability for the people in that chat who might have actually shared those images further? so by and large none of them are going to face any real problems unless they themselves held security clearances with the us government. but if they were just ordinary, average teenagers, goofing off on a chat and gaming, as it sounds li

leak the documents did not need to hack into the computer or chelsea manning had done all of the passwords security clearance to get into the computer to to pass the documents on to wiki weeks. then we have u. c global, the spanish security firm that set up cameras and recording devices throughout the ecuador and embassy in london. and turned over all of that tape to the cia vis a rating attorney, client privilege. we have the fact that julian is not a us citizen. so there's that question of how he can even be charged under the espionage act. wiki weeks is not a u. s. based publication. so i've sat in on the trials and then during coven was getting up at 5 in the morning and getting links to follow the trials of vo video stream. and when you look at all of the details of the case, and i think that's one of the reasons why the u. k. judicial system made it so difficult to cover. it's clear that this is not the best of british jurisprudence, but the louis, aka. so i, i think all was from the beginning have assumed that he would be expedited, remember, was an extra dated under w

i don't see that happening here, partially because in this case, like chelsea manning or say edward snowdeny wanted to public writ large, to the entire world, and they wanted to do it through the media. with this individual he was just showing off in a discord chat. it was still an intentional and deliberately but it was not in the same context —based of the facts we know right now. i don't see some of those judges being considered. some of those 'udges being considered.— some of those 'udges being considered. ., ., ., considered. there were a lot of other people — considered. there were a lot of other people in _ considered. there were a lot of other people in that _ considered. there were a lot of other people in that chat, - considered. there were a lot of other people in that chat, what j other people in that chat, what is the liability for the people in that chat who might have actually shed those images further? 50 actually shed those images further? , . actually shed those images further? _ ., ., ., further? so by and large none of them are — further? so by and large none of them are

you saw that same kind of thing and the chelsea manning case so their internal it kind of mechanism islready compromised. they believe that they weren't getting credit weren't having these other issues. they wanted to be more important, and so they took different routes. uh snowden certainly published it, then stole millions of copies and files if you will and took them to russia. chelsea manning exposed a lot of information, and by the way, all of these cases victor they had access to, uh, information that was flowing by them. they were all supposed to keep things moving, not necessarily read them. analyze them understand the information that that was in front of them. so there is this resemblance and again, this particular invent individual went to the chat room to try to puff himself up exactly the kind of language we saw in snowden and chelsea manning. interesting that answer takes me in two different directions. first let me go to you highlight approach. oh, file of a person who leaks. four different motivations here, but the key is to identify those characteristics before they ca

he's not chelsea manning. he's not edward snowden , who were trying to blow the whistle on what they viewed as as as government wrongdoing. it appears he was just showing off. well yeah, and not only the question is why did the pentagon grant access to such a young sort of low ranking member but also why the new york times was at his house talking to his stepfather? before the feds showed up. i know they were surveilling the home, i just post and the wall of the washington post and the new york times. no no. and even some members of our our team. we're chatting with some of the members and we're trying to trying to figure out how to get to him. so the fbi started. you know, the investigation began on friday. pretty quickly they realized where they were needed needed to look and they started interviewing some of these guys . you know, for the for the fbi, they need to figure out how to build a case and a case that can stand up in court. and so you know from, you know, covering these cases. it's just pretty quic

who is chelsea manning?> byron: jesse madden is the former military intelligence analyst convicted of 20 charges including espionage for linking the largest trove of classified documents in u.s. history to wikileaks. michael maker juju chang said she withdrew after her release from prison. her sentence commuted by former president barack obama in 2017. while working as an intelligence analyst, manning says she saw the horrors of war unfold in classified material and she later leaked to the public. >> reporter: you decide to break the law. what was it that you were seeing that could compel you to do that? >> i stop seeing just statistics and information and i started seeing people. >> this disclosure is not just an attack on america's foreign policy interests. it is an attack on the international community. >> do not think any of it was going to threaten national security? >> no. >> byron: with some of the documents manning leaks were ultimately found in osama bin laden's pakistan compound >> juju: you may ha

they have had enough awnings, chelsea manning, edward i awnings, chelsea manning, edward snowden, whyps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. _ obvious gaps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. i _ obvious gaps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. i think— obvious gaps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. i think of- obvious gaps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. i think of it - obvious gaps being plugged? yes, i don't understand. i think of it in - don't understand. i think of it in terms of when you do a private business transaction like real estate, the documents are available online, you can see them online and you can sign them. then they are controlled, both your signatures are control, the access is controlled, the knowledge of what you have done with it is controlled and you can restrict whether you can download it or not. that sort of software solution ought to be routine in the intelligence community, i think. the pentauon intelligence community, i think. the pentagon said it is the nature of them to trust young people with this information. i was listening

in 2010 chelsea manning gave .75 million sensitive documents to wikileaks that specializes in a bush classified material. should chelsea manning, or jack teixeira, both relatively junior had access to so much secret information? the pentagon is looking into how information is distributed, but says the rules were clearly broken. >> this was a deliberate criminal act to violate guidelines, in the same way that if you locked your front door and someone came in her house and took something, you followed procedures and locked your door, but somebody went in your house and it took something and put it took something inputted out on the street. that is what we are talking about here. >> jack teixeira's arrest followed a day of growing speculation about the source of the latest spy drama. first, the washington post newspaper published a description of a young man working on a military base that had shared classified information with a small group of friends. starting as far back as 2020 during the early months of lockdown. the online friends included amazingly individuals in both russia and

chelsea manning got 35 years. wikileaks was a huge trove of information. this information that was out was out for an entire month. they think on discord, which is a long time for it to be sitting there and people to be sifting through it. it touched on some of the allies of the united states as well as the enemies. what could he face? is this big enough similar to the chelsea manning case, or is this something that is a little less damaging? although certainly a bit damaging. so i was talking to evan just before we went on trying to figure out what is the scope of this, you know, we originally talking about 100 documents. now there's published reports out there saying, you know, there may be 500. so first you have to get a handle of it. but let's zero in on the legal piece, which is he's going to be charged with unauthorized access of these documents on our authorized use of these documents, but how many documents every one of those can become a count. okay mint. so now we have a probable cause arrest. today we have an affidavit filed in the form of a com

chelsea manning $2.00 . but nobody is going to discuss the actual facts and the facts spell out. i'm the american. they have a form. it's inside the russian ministry of defense according to this document. so we don't know if this is true or not. so that would be lovely to have an answer from the russia. nice. ok, my if i, if true. i mean, that's a thought even was in the allegation, was it said that because they wanted russia to shake the tree and see who would, who would fall out of the panic. yeah, cause panic up, cause scales. it's thing, fire of scales. we can have one for a get that in, obviously. and so that's it. you know, so did, according to their documents, assuming that they didn't pass despite the fact that they took the right to christ on taiwan. no, that was the would be to think that we, europeans must be comfortable on this topic and take our q from the yes agenda and chinese overreaction. so mac, all just figured out apparently that france can have a foreign policy that's independent and not

>> the teen described the small group as his online family and said unlike edward snowden or chelsea manning, he was national guard a whistle-blower. just a guy showing off for impressionable kids locked down during covid. the man known as o.g. who we know to be airman teixeira spoke to the group. >> we had members crying. we had people just distraught and saddened. it was almost like seeing a family member pass away. he seemed a bit confused. he always had the answer to everything. >> members screen shotted 300 documents since they were uploaded about a month ago. it's not clear if more will continue to be released online despite teixeira's arrest. neil? >> neil: thank you, jennifer. now to chris swecker, the former fbi be assistant director. how does someone of this low rank get his hands on intelligence like this? >> great question, neil, this is the classic insider threat. it's probably a situation where, you know, he had access to information he didn't need to have access to. he probably didn't get through the background depth that needed to. the information itself getting that to our a

but there are similarities with previous l similarities with previous lives, and 2010 chelsea manningarters of a million sensitive documents to wikileaks, was specialises in class —— publishing classified material. should chelsea manning orjack teixeira, both relativelyjunior, have had relatively junior, have had access relativelyjunior, have had access to so much secretive information? the pentagon says is looking into how information is looking into how information is distributed, but says the rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate _ rules were clearly broken. ti 3 was a deliberate criminal act to violate those guidelines and rules. in the same way that if you lock your front door and somebody came in your house and took something, you follow procedures and altidore bazzoni came in your house and took something, that is what we're talking about here. that something, that is what we're talking about here.— paul adams reporting on its own. 0 high speed two gordon lawson. a former naval officer assigned to the defence intelligence agency and ceo of cyber security firm conceal

that is going to happen is going to be chelsea manning to point 0, but nobody is going to discuss the actual facts and the fact spell out ah, the american, they have a form. it's inside the russian ministry of defense. according to these documents we moved, this is true or not. so that would be lovely to hell, an answer from the russian list. okay, my job, if that is true, i mean, that's a thought even was an allegation. was it say that because they wanted russia to shake the tree and see who would they would fall out? yeah, i called to panic. yeah, cause panic, copa cause scales. it's thing pyre of scales. we can have my forget that in obviously i throw the restless. busy off balance, wow. me too is preparing the so called counter offensive. when i spoke to under a marciano, which one of the best, a military analyst, right in the me, english anywhere in the world. he said, i wouldn't stress him if you think that offense, i got that off. okay, i'll keep my distance. you'll have some free, right? so even if it's through and if it's true or failed, it doesn't matter. doesn't matter beca

unlike edward snowden and chelsea manning, he was not a whistle-blower. just a guy showing off for impression able kids. the man known as o.g. spoke to the group. >> we had members crying. we had people distraught and sad. it's like seeing a family member pass away. he seemed a bit confused to what to do in his scenario, which is unbe fitting of him. always had the answer to everything. >> confronted at his home by reporters this morning, air man teixeira's prengts said he now needed a lawyer and that they had expected the feds would arrive at any time. we saw that arrival moments ago on television. martha? >> so many things go through my mind as you're reporting this story, jennifer. the most important is that it feels like we're living in an environment where people who are good on these websites and all these places appear to be kind of running circles around our own intelligence and pentagon. is that fair to say? >> well, i think the problem is after 9-11 we opened intelligence up to -- we didn't want to silo intelligence, so you allowed people with se

should chelsea manning, orjack teixeira, both relatively junior, have had access to so secret informationit is looking into how information is distributed but said the rules were clearly broken. this distributed but said the rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate _ were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal— were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal act - were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal act to - deliberate criminal act to violate _ deliberate criminal act to violate those _ deliberate criminal act to violate those guidelines. deliberate criminal act to i violate those guidelines and rules — violate those guidelines and rules in_ violate those guidelines and rules. in the _ violate those guidelines and rules. in the same - violate those guidelines and rules. in the same way- violate those guidelines and rules. in the same way that| violate those guidelines and. rules. in the same way that if you lock— rules. in the same way that if you lock your— rules. in the same way that if you lock your front _ rules. in the same way that if you lock you

in 2010 chelsea manning gave documents to wikileaks.orjack teixeira, both relevant —— relativelyjunior have had access to information? the pentagon said the rules were clearly broken. this information? the pentagon said the rules were clearly broken.— rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate _ rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal— rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal act _ rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal act to - rules were clearly broken. this was a deliberate criminal act to violate | a deliberate criminal act to violate those rules, in the same way if you locked your front door and somebody came in your house and took somebody and you followed procedure, but somebody took something, that is what we are talking about. this has not been a good — what we are talking about. this has not been a good week— what we are talking about. this has not been a good week for— what we are talking about. this has not been a good week for the - not been a good week for the pen

you know, there was the chelsea manning case and so forth that involved volumes of documents, but, uh, this should really wake people up because this is very sensitive information its military information intelligence information. and diplomatic information. and uh, in a in a point where we're certainly not directly involved in the conflict, but we have a lot of stake in it and its recent information as well. i think that's what's really alarming to a lot of national security officials when he's in court tomorrow. what kind of charges do you think you're going to see? primary it seems that from the language used by the attorney general, it seems it will be violations of the espionage act. you know the statutes that cover the handling of national defense information , and i'm glad that he's going to be tried in the federal court system rather than court martialed. and uh, as evan was saying, i think the eastern district of virginia is the perfect place to try this case. what kind of punishment do you think if he is charged with something from the espionage espionage act or something? i

particularly of john kerry, iq chelsea manning and julian assange.e is managing editor of shadow, proof a press organization which exposes systemic abuses of power in government and business. >> thank you, it is an honor to be here and be part of this really esteemed group of delegates. and, also this is a far better event than the hayden center event that was held back in december with some very serious people, including a brief appearance by michael, we still, secrets hayden. the political plays against julian assange is primarily composed of a conspiracy theory that comes from the central intelligence agency. in april 2017, as we have been hearing, in the first speech from cia director, mike pompeo, you're not only labeled wikileaks a non state hostile intelligence service, but he also asserted that, wikileaks directed chelsea manning in her theft of specific secret information. part of my book, guilty of journalism, the political case against julian assange, focuses on unraveling this conspiracy theory. manning was not directed by wikileaks to ma

in chelsea manning's case, the government withheld a damage in chelsea manning's case, the governmentisclosures caused no real harm to national security. she was facing 35 years in prison. more recently, most recently, i represented, and still represent, daniel hale. [applause] huge shoutout to daniel. i know he's paying attention to this. but, basically, daniel had to navigate an espionage act prosecution in the most conservative federal court in the country, the exact same court where assange is indicted, in front of the same judge. daniel is a veteran of the u.s. air force who participated in the u.s. drone assassination program. after leaving the air force, he became an outspoken opponent of the u.s.'s targeted killing program. he basically called out and informed the public about targeting ineffectiveness and casualties and consistently exaggerating the accuracy of drone strikes and underreporting civilian deaths. daniel's house was searched in 2014. like julian assange, he lived under a sword of damocles for a better part of his adult life. in may 2019, he was finally arrested a

now then the question becomes, when you have things like, um chelsea manning leak and now this one. how much access do we allow? which technician? at what level? um it seems like this guy had too much. one of the reasons i think that they were really careful with the arrest is josh was talking about that that they were very deliberate about this is they didn't know how much this person had pulled down off of the systems and perhaps were fearing that they do a massive dump. um because they knew that they were about to be jailed. colonel according to the new york times. excuse me, the washington post reporting this suspect apparently had a dark view of the u. s government. he viewed it as a sinister force that's not to suppress its citizens and keep them in the dark, and he ranted about quote government overreach. i'm just curious. how worrisome is that to you? knowing that this isn't just some average citizen? this is somebody with top intelligence clearance, it seems to be and somebody who's working as a national guardsmen. yeah you know, it's clearly brianna very concerning and a o

he hops in this group unlike edward snowden as we know it right now and chelsea manning when he was a man, went in there they wanted to be leakers. they want to the get this stuff out he wanted to be the big man be in a 20-person chat room and it got bigger. and began to expand. and he knew he was in trouble. he had a meeting with these guys and said basically i love you all. things are out of control. the people that were in the group essentially sunrise said they never seen him like this. he did not know what to do. therefore, this day was coming. they knocked on his door, howe out comes his step-father. his step-father says i think my son is going to need a lawyer. next thing you know when the swat team comes up the fbi arrives and go and grab him out of his mom's house. there you go. does it matter his intent ultimately with this case? i don't know. chelsea manning got pardoned by the president. how bad could that be? and edward snowden having great life in russia. >> steve: started in disorder room of which that apparently that group liked online war games and the leaker wanted t

many of you remember edward snowden or chelsea manning, why does this keep happening here and not reallywhere else was former director of national intelligence john ratcliff. gop race for the white house intensifying, michael pompeo decided he's not jumping in. what about new hampshire and new hampshire governor will he get in question mckee is here we will ask them. karl rove is here to honor dirty politics getting even dirtier and messier. the food fight ain't over. welcome everyone iran to happy to have you. happy weekend but not happy we can for political ads but will get into that in a minute. the latest on the leaker and what is going down will go to alexandria hoff with more on that. >> fox news sources tell us their additional hours looking at that could have to do with how this young man was given access to critical intel or who else helped to spread it online. the 21 year old air national guardsmen face a judge in boston yesterday for allegedly leaking some of the countries top-secret online. jack's father relatives were there as well meaning a swarm of a price as you can see h

and this is vitally important to remember without sources like chelsea manning, like publishers likewikileaks and the partners, to bring this information forward, what would we not have known, just over the course of my career, would we not have known that prisoners were tortured and sexually humiliated? would we not have known that this cia set up dungeons where people were held incommunicado, and subjected to barbaric treatment? we wouldn't have known that any person died in a drone strike. we wouldn't have known that they employed systems of mass -- without consent or knowledge from the public. these are all things that the governments classified at the absolute highest level of secrecy, and yet can anyone really say that the public in a democracy does not have a right to know or a need to know any of the things that i have just said? if this prosecution goes forward and ends in conviction it will be a very dark day for the press freedom in the united states. the prosecution already had a chilling effect in newsrooms around the country. the lawyers for publications are already est

i was in the court room with chelsea manning when she was being tried at for me for leaking the documents, and there are only $27.00 visitors allowed in the courtroom. the same with julia. it's so heavily restricted that you have to get up at 4 or 5 in the morning and stand in line and hope that you can get in. and then although the problems i will say cleared up initially when we were following by video link, there was no audio. the pictures went out, people couldn't get on. so on some level they understand that this is judicial burlesque kind of dickensian, far something out. a bleak house and, and i think that's why they make it always make it very difficult to cover, including all these extra disc cases that you mentioned. and let me guess, and 5 hash me case, they probably cited socks as material support to terrorists. i think that was it, i mean, you know, and then they sent them to florence dx. i just, it was quite, i mean, it was quite a frightening window into what had happened to our own judiciary and how, especially after 911, it just became a tool of repression for any just, i

it reminds me, more, really, o the chelsea man in case that you might remember about a decade ago, samesition in some sort of communications discovers lot of information and then seek to move it in different ways it is shocking, but also, at the same point, it is not that surprising when you think abou how people can get access to these sorts of things. based on the pictures that wer taken in the really good article done by the washington post, you can see that these were actual pronounce that wer taken out. it could be that thi individual did not really have lots of access to it, bu somehow had access to printe copies of what would normall be briefing books or types o wreaking briefing books. i think that will be the big question everybody is asking i'm hoping this fb investigation will provide a little bit more clarity in the coming days about how this exactly happened, what i looked like, what print outs that were folded up and just walk out of the building >> but what about the fact tha this guy is an i. t. specialist? i'm going to say, an i. t. expert and our government systems a b

, and so you've got to find a balance with that and then of course we had, you know, bradley, chelsea manningnd edward snowden which occurred when i was in moscow, 2013. >> so when you look at that, but you look at how different things are even now, things change by the hour, let alone the year, right, in terms of that you say how quickly the technology has changed. let me just read to you, if i can, general, what bloomberg points out for teixeira's role it's called the cyber transport systems journeyman it requires a high school degree, a driver's license, and up to 18 months of on the job training so i guess on one side you have an understandable argument they know much more about that stuff than folks in our age category do, right and they're very able with it. on the other hand, what they don't have is experience maybe somebody who's 19 or 20 or 21 lacks the contextual ability to understand how important what they may be taking is. so how do you balance those things >> and the word -- chris, the word is balance because, yes, there is an experience they get a lot of training, and they get

we remember chelsea manning an by the, way chelsea mannin dropped 750,000 highly classified cables and emails a real treasure trove, 750,000 here we have about 100 documents or so so we have t keep it in perspective these kind of events are going to occur because of huma foibles. you know our intelligence coul be the yasmin as you know ha the most exclusive technolog to protect the secrets but whe you put a human and the machine, the possibility that a human will make a decision to do something on toward kind o skyrockets so point, what we have bee here before. 0.2 and it's really the one yo and matt were just discussing, how are other nations viewin this and there will be a fair amoun of public, kind of natio particularly about some of the revelations about u.s. spyin on other nations but frankly, all of thes national governments take look at each other constantly. that is the reality. so i don't see this as something that will suddenly shift the gears. but is that a concern? absolutely >> that is absolutely right. i don't think it is ever kin of a major revelation or shocking that th

julian assange, edward snowden, chelsea manning? guest: what we are seeing a lot of people are saying in government people would admit this is the logical result, because if you classify everything at the end of the day nothing is safe. this is something that works on a psychological level, right? even 50 ar ago the pentagon papers case when daniel ellsberg release that classified secret history of america's involvement in vietnam. even then people in the nixon administration said too much information was given classified and it was leading people to be cynical as to whether the information was really dangerous and did have to be protected, so even 50 years ago people were saying that one reason why even then we were having these massive leaks was because too much information it was getting classified and people on the inside no longer believed it. ey themselves did not the information was actually secret. in the case of the pentagon papers, they would have had a point. afterward ellsberg would sometimes say that nobody could point

his actions in conjunction with those of bradley manning now known as chelsea manning highlighted the fact that there was an information flow out or classified information. and that it was making its way into the hands of a journalist. it was published. so whenever a journalist publishes sensitive information like they're always open to being accused of being a spot, the 2003 war was predicated on a false 3 types of weapons of mass destruction being based in the country and lead to decades of tumor here and he will continue to chronicle those deadly days and they're off them off in our coverage of the us led invasion of iraq at this hour. american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free people, and to defend the world from great. how are we referring to the iraqi people who with medicine and fleet with them? well, i don't know. this is a boy who is on the world, so part will be back here with more news. so he's doing this. i looked up with . what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy, even foundation, let i

his actions in conjunction with those of bradley manning now known as chelsea manning highlighted the fact that there was an information flow out of classified information. and that it was making its way into the hands of a journalist who was published. so whenever a journalist publishes sensitive information like they're always open to being accused of being a spy, that's isn't. and 3 war was predicated on the full 3 tags of weapons of mass destruction being based in the country i'm led to decades of serve on here on our team will continue to coordinate who was deadly day that they're off them off in our coverage of the us led invasion of iraq at this hour. american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free people, and to defend the world from great. how we with the medicine and fleet with well, barrels out. this is our, my colleague, rachel blevins, will be with you at the top of the hour with more instructional news. i'm run from ami wishing you all a very pleasant sunday. a to what we've got to do is identify the threats that we ha

how it happened with chelsea manning with private manning, and when it came out that private manning had some psychological issues. what did they do? the military removed private manning's gun. they did not remove private manning's access to classified information, and it shows to me that there's just this different understanding of the fact. like, well, you know, wikileaks. perhaps people actually died from that. i don't know. but you know it is just a serious but i don't think that the way the military indoctrinates people and i don't think they talk about it. they don't think about it because it's not their job. the weapons are their job. executing is their job, not protecting the information, so i don't want to go overboard and saying like, oh, it's the military's fault. but i just think that this is a wake up call. let's take advantage of it and put in place some better standards. and so if you look at just some of the headlines and again, the government is urging news organizations who now have access to this information. post online. please be careful about what you write, but

but clearly those measures put in place after chelsea manning did not work here, and we're learning tonighthat the defense secretary lloyd austin, has already called for yet another review of what kind of people have access to this and why. and what about this? this person's motivation not just to take the documents, but to distribute them to the it is. little chat group online generally falls into four categories. they use an acronym mice for this, and those four categories are money, ideology, coercion of foreign power or someone who has the goods on you , for instance, but also ego. it's not clear here. i mean, you have a young man, part of a group where there may have just been some simple boasting going on. right. here's what i know and sharing it in that context, but that's going to be one of the first things that goes on here right in. interrogation to figure out as we're watching the pictures there of his arrest there exactly what motivated him to do this and do. government officials have a full grasp yet on the damage assessment, you know, they don't but but i've spoken to people i

he was the lead trial attorney for chelsea manning, who was a 22 year old army intelligence analyst when she stole and leaked more than 700,000 classified documents to wikileaks east. it was wikileaks . it was done in protest. good to have you with us tonight, so to share is facing two federal charges tonight, more could be added. based on the evidence that's been laid out in that affidavit or the information. i should say that was laid out in that affidavit. what are you expecting to see here? well i do think the complaint here was just the first draft. the prosecutors. clearly we're trying to do this as quickly as possible, given the fact they had to do the arrest. i would not be surprised to see a lot more charges coming down the road when they do the subsequent indictment. chelsea manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison sentence later commuted by president obama, if convicted. could jack to share be looking at? would you expect a similar sentence? i don't think so. i again the manning case dealt with hundreds of thousands of documents. this by all accounts is somewhere in the nei

that can be done giving them a top -- tsci clearance is just unbelievable and unbelievable after chelsea manningard snowden that we are still giving clearances to this kind of young person. >> sandra: jennifer, merrick garland is taking to the microphone. >> jack douglas teixeira, investigation into unauthorized removal, transmission, transition of national defense information. he is an employee of the united states air national guard. fbi agents took teixeira into custody earlier this afternoon without incident. initial appearance at the district of massachusetts. thank the fbi, justice department prosecutors, and our colleagues at the department of defense for their diligent work on this case. this investigation is ongoing. we will share more information at the appropriate time. thanks, everyone. >> did he have lawful access to the document, sir? >> sandra: that's the news. jack douglas teixeira, employee of the united states air force national guard, he was taken into custody without incident. >> bill: and merrick garland saying he will make an appearance in the district of massachusetts, fed

i look at chelsea manning.i look at edward stone, and it's the common threads here in that you have someone at a relatively low level who had a clearance but had access to materials that seemed far beyond their duties or at least the ability to do so. and i know this particular person had a had a cyber role that gave them perhaps capability to do that. the d o. d has tried to correct to plug these holes after previous leaks. when you look at chelsea manning, they clearly have not plug those holes. why not? and why aren't there greater restrictions on what people can access beyond their actual day to day duties? secretary austin at the pentagon is doing that right now. the president directed both he the intel community as well as the state department and take a look at the protocols and procedures that are in place for access to classified material. and just as importantly, the distribution of that classified material, so we're gonna we're gonna learn more. that, but why not before right? i mean, the vulnerabili

or maybe chelsea manning. or maybe jeffrey wigand . who the insider right with big tobacco. where erin brockovich, right, so what is a whistleblower? what is the leaker? you know they patriot or a traitor, right? the conversations. i think that i bet will go on after this segment are going to be let me lick my finger and stick it in the air and see which way the wind is blowing, and then i'll decide how to feel about the sky. people i night talking to friends today watching the video of him being arrested. people actually feel bad for him. um you know, i had a couple of friends who said to me i actually feel bad for him because there's also video that of him sitting in his yard before they have, like the news helicopters and the reporters had already been at the home just as the fbi was arriving, maybe even before, and there's video of him just sitting in his yard. looking over. some paper also just raised the question of why does the 21 year old who was you know by all accounts like, um, an i t guy quiz he really was, but still why does why is he able to have access to our

his actions in conjunction with those of bradley manning now known as chelsea manning highlighted the fact that there was an information flow outward of classified information. and that it was making its way into the hands of a journalist who was published. so whenever a journalist publishes sensitive information like they're always open to being accused of being a spot with a 2003 war was predicated on the false pretext of weapons of mass destruction being in the country and lead to decades of turmoil. your own rti will continue to chronicle those deadly days, amber aftermath and our coverage of the us led invasion of iraq at this hour. american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free its people, and to defend the world from gray. with . with, with examining the growing movement, calling for looted artifacts to be returned to their home loans. it is christie, i on the cost of everything. next, will it put priceless works of art in all necessary danger. are right. the wrongs of colonialism, not right ahead. with blue there seems to b

pointing as well option that julian assange was not the one who leaked the documents that was at chelsea manning pardon by president obama, back in 2017. yet. as you say, after 4 years of imprisonment, jenny, this is still in the cross hairs of the u. s. government begging the question, why? well, he reveal the true nature of the fake democratic values of western europe and the united states. but also, you know, he did reveal documents that caused a shadow across russia, across the global south government in latin america in africa. it was a journalism for the entire world. it was a resource and is a resource on the internet right now with you to all of that you can go to, to find out truth behind the lies in nature nation. so gold free media newspapers and the betrayals by fellow journalists against julian assange was on a massive scale. the papers that he partnered with the guardian newspaper dish beagle so many that washington post new york times. all these newspapers, the way they turned on him with fake sexual allegations and that all manner of things all the time. while the cia was bred pr

his actions in conjunction with those of bradley manning now known as chelsea manning highlighted the fact that there was an information flow out or classified information. and that it was making its way into the hands of a journalist who was published. so whenever a journalist publishes sensitive information like they're always open to being accused of being a spy, the 2003 war was predicated only false, pretext of weapons of mass destruction being based in the country. and led to decades of turmoil here and our team will continue to chronicle those deadly days under aftermath in our coverage of the us led invasion of iraq at this hour, american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from great with food medicine and fleet with next here, all righty. annette chapman's red alert. talking record us defense spending on weapons on the hollow. the military industrial complex winds. when tensions with ah mm hm. mm hm. welcome to, well, the part one unforeseen. you have to vividly manifest that consequen

his actions in conjunction with those of bradley manning now known as chelsea manning highlighted the fact that there was an information flow outward of classified information. and that it was making its way into the hands of a journalist who was published. so whenever a journalist publishes sensitive information like they're always open to being accused of being a spy, the 2003, what was predicated all the full pretext of weapons of mass destruction being based in the country and lead to decades of tomo here at ortiz, will continue to quantify critical those deadly days and they're off them off in our coverage of the us led invasion of iraq at this hour. american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free people, and to defend the world from great. who's with medicine in sleep with vall that rows of this news out chris c, i is on the cost of everything next. and we'll be back with more news at the top of the to what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy implementation. let it be an arms race move is often ver

a fever, the question is not an idle one, of course, it happens, the former bradley is not a chelsea manning informant, wikilex about the iraq war also did not come out for ranks and years, but earlier leaks looked more solid and motivation. the height of the vietnam war us state department strategic analyst daniel elsberg, handed over to the newspaper, the new york times, pentagon documents on the country's participation in the vietnam conflict, a dossier of almost 7,000 pages contained information about the operations of the us military in north vietnam. misleading the us congress for disclosing the gustayana elsberg. it threatened, 116 years in prison on under pressure in general, in reality, the court acquitted him, a year later in june 72 in washington included in the election campaign. the police detained five people who were setting up microphones in the us democracy office in the sergeit hotel among those arrested were former cia agents and nexon campaign staffers . the news did not affect the electorate. parents and nixon was re-elected, however, the scandal gained momentum. a washi

countries are in a fever, the question is not idle, of course, it happens, the former bradley is not chelsea manning, the wikileaks informant about the arab war also did not come out with ranks and years, but before leaks looked more solid and motivating. us state department strategic analyst daniel elsberg, speaking in vietnam, handed over to the newspaper, the new york times, pentagon documents on the country's participation in the vietnam conflict, a dossier of almost 7,000 pages contained information about the operations of the us military in north vietnam. but most importantly , it proved the fact of the direct participation of the administration of lyndon johnson in escalation and misrepresentation of the us congress for disclosing the gustaiana of elsbergs. grozilo 116 years in prison. but under public pressure. the court acquitted him, a year later in june 72 washington enters the election campaign. the police detained five people who were setting up microphones in the us democracy office in the hotel from sergeevich. among those arrested were former cia agents and campaign staff. nixon was