and to continue the discussion for possible citywide i'm more comfortable with the open-ended type of - >> i'm sorry to - >> continue the discussions. >> to consider a that's correct it's a different meaning and seeing the discussion of the legislation. >> commissioner johnson. >> thanks i know yeah, that gets us there before now we were talking about the use of words analysis that is specific important the planning department it is not necessary if we didn't pass it today there's no analysis so i agree that it one thing about the motion it sounds like if we are recommending supervisor wiener's legislation that we're n reprimanding it with no modification that makes it styling there are no substantial changes to supervisor wiener's legislation. >> okay. thank you. >> i know excuse me. rarp through the chair there was a modification of the definition what an accessory use not the other entertainment but considered a remarkably game. >> okay yes. >> thank you so commissioners there is a motion and second to death penalty a recommendation of approval with modifications to limit the amend

. >> be applied citywide all mcd so all are permanent use so i certainly know think the commission can hold it's recommendation this is a legislation of the board and so the board needs to act in order to make the change and the actual amendment to the legislation i want to note it is is a board change in the legislation that can you remember the protective only prices to the you were market street mcd and the recommendation adapted will make it citywide and okay. thank you commissioner johnson >> thank you very much i definitely agree with staffs represents i ask a quick question if this ordinance were to pass with administrations as identified would this create on overall phase with the police code and it is trying to metrological the arresting cascades games throughout the city. >> would this do anything to the hate street legislation that is already passed or super keyed it. >> supersede it right before it allows arcade amazement games on the second floor. >> commissioner moore. >> i feel hesitant because the diversity entities are varied and complex we very specific neighborhood c

. >> i'll agree with commissioner moore this might be beneficial citywide but a jump maybe we should ask for today what is being asked we the supervisor what the supermarket will provide arcades on the first or second floor and other entertainment use i will make a motion to approve that with that being the action we're taking. >> second. >> if i could intersect i think we should look at more comprehensive things i know it's the right move to signify approval for upper market but don't need every entities to come back for the legislation of the cd i don't want to jump to citywide with the public or the staff with those. >> commissioner richards. >> i completely agree with commissioner moore and commissioner antonini that commissioner president wu it is premature to go citywide it makes sense i'll support that. >> commissioner moore. >> 3rd district was our supervisor and while president chiu might have supported supervisor wiener i've not heard discussion that she has engaged in having a larger discussion on being citywide it's for that reason i would ask to move some of the other co

. >> i would accept that as you know, a recommendation to the supervisors to study citywide. >> thanks. >> into the seconder. >> the simplify is it is the planning department initiated by the supervisors so it has to be first a discussion a staff represents to the supervisors just as a discussion we're having today whether or not other supervisors are interested and we'll pick it up as a separate matter the supervisor is made of by the people if the district. >> i understand but it needs to be an official way to say a citywide question would be fine. >> my pd is that the commission would like there to be more analysis to do this citywide and asking the supervisors in reality the supervisors b will ask us to do the analysis but it is also engaging their personal preference of what they want to include it i see no harm in making the recommendations to the board it to engage their preferences and incorporate such analysis if necessary into our work. >> i've worded it that captures that spirit. >> commissioner moore if i may this requires a different discussion i want to see the department

but don't need every entities to come back for the legislation of the cd i don't want to jump to citywide with the public or the staff with those. >> commissioner richards. >> i completely agree with commissioner moore and commissioner antonini that commissioner president wu it is premature to go citywide it makes sense i'll support that. >> commissioner moore. >> 3rd district was our supervisor and while president chiu might have supported supervisor wiener i've not heard discussion that she has engaged in having a larger discussion on being citywide it's for that reason i would ask to move some of the other commissioners are already supporting. >> commissioner johnson. >> thank you again supportive of the staff recommendations but also supportive of supervisor wiener's reason for coming to us in the fingertip i ask can we add a finding that the board of supervisors should consider citywide legislation is that - >> i don't know is that stronger i would like a comment how are we're going to transmit we said it here we said the peripheries to collaborate. >> if you can make that part of ou

department here to discuss the citywide nexus study. this committee had a hearing on this adoption. we have scheduled the adoption hearing for next week. since the initiation hearing staff also met with the eastern neighborhood puc to discuss this in more detail. i'm going quickly through why what the legislation is doing. as a reminder the department created the nexus study to update the existing nexus study and they are kind of out of date and also use the analysis approach. we also wanted to update how the administration of the fees worked. so this ordinance is all amended article 4 of the planning code which is where we host the development impact fees in the downtown and area plan fees and citywide fees. the main thing we are doing is incorporating a reference to the citywide nexus analysis in updating the findings. we are also, and again the focus of this effort is really up to the administrative. so the existing around the existing program. most of the fees that we have are established 32 you a community planning project through

flagged there is some kind of a public participation structure with stakeholders from a boarder citywide reach to engage the port and the city on those port wide issues along with the bcdc representatives that are selected for health identified by bcdc state lands i think we've all come to understand the indicas what is consistent with the public trust and how to balance it with the public benefits and the public access and be able to finance the improvements along the waterfront are shared by both parties so we see ourselves refreshing and looking at want current membership of the advise groups we have representing that membership with the areas we want to make sure are covered and making sure we have a port wide-body that can also homogenize and integrated integrate the recommends on the waterfront and tells you about the outreach has been so far is there a process getting it out citywide. >> we have been working at a number of different levels certainly to starting with the port authority's and 55 the advisors groups gone to the city and spur citywide organizations spur we've gone to

. >> so citywide. the city issue is the mellow roost. which is not an impact fee. it's a special taxing district. that is not addressed in this per say, correct? >> correct. this legislation doesn't cover that and also there is a scale question. over the next 5 years the amount of revenue that all the plans are generating is not a contribution towards the transbay project in the dtx. i understand what you are trying to work on and there will be presentations about that moving forward. >> i understand the issue around the entrance bay but the benefits extend well beyond those few covered by the mellow roos and it's where the areas you are considering the general citywide nexus fees throughout the city that will include the areas impacted by this. >> i hear your question. >president cindy wu: commissioner richards? >commissioner dennis richards: richards i find myself agreeing with ms. hester. i think it might be something to do. i may have been the one asking a lot of those questions. i have a question, how did us this tie into the affordable housing fees, when is t

take it to the mission or castro their way below thirty percent i'll august it is more than the citywide balance the old solution to pollution to the da illustration by simply spreading this around lastly another issue how much of new housing is occupied by residents you might have seen the upwards of condos are owner occupied think that that. >> is there any additional public comment. >> okay public comment is closed i wanted to thank the staff for the data i'm encouraged one of the first things we've talked about it the neighborhood stabilization but the main tool there right now is long site i think we have a lot to do to beef up small sites next is the pilot projects whatever we learn from that i hope we can ramp it up to x perishing ramp it up for more units on the question of short-term rentals or ways that the neighborhoods are not stabilized right now i think this commission should have a number of meetings next year when the airbnb are close to the short-term rental legislation is actually begins to be implemented we have a hearing on the enforcements here there's a lot of quest

additionally on safe streets and the education subcommittee vision zero we're putting together a citywide strategy an item that supervisor yee had recommended we have a strategy currently underway we're doing best practices research but we're on schedule to having a draft strategy that we can come and bring back spring of next year hoping to have that draft completed by the end of march but that strategy will be a first step in the city talking about saying that all departments are going to work together in developing an education mostly an education program making our streets safe it is a long time coming we're making progress i don't know if you have questions about the safe street program we're a thousand pledges for safe streets in our county that both joined the effort and will be putting the budget inspections displaying their support and shuttle drivers are joining at this point in time and we are doing roll out and presentations to the chamber of commerce getting on the agenda for this etc. and as part of that the project is underway sfpd is out with additional enhanced enforcemen

get the data we'll see some very good progress made on the education accident john mentioned the citywide education strategy we started with the sf pledge and have the larger vehicle i want to the thank paul from the ecology team that focused on helping us there's much more work to do but we can break ground quickly by disseminate nationally it to groups and trying to figure out how to institutionalize vision zero and the funding it is difficult to fund those programs there is a mechanism but the applicable accomplishment we've seen working with the traffic and safety a strong commitment to figure out a strategy we'll be exploring that in the next year an evaluation monitoring that is to answer the questions how effective are the policies we've been fortunate that we've moved some done bureaucratic things how to fund a position with the mta and public health we've worked with public health department on the work order to help with the team do the data analyzed when we have collisions we're going to be working with the police department to get revolved that the analysis when they have the

infrastructure report i find very interesting because what it's trying to do is have a level service or a citywide basis in an area with lower density residents you don't need as much transit as the higher density area so when we worked on the capital planning meeting, is to affect all impact fees and if you are in a neighborhood with a high person per acre which is the term we use or person per block then your service levels are different for all different facilities, streetscapes, parks. we might be coming back to you to talking about how the capital planning committee is interested in using that information to do our overall city capital plan for all infrastructure. how do we think about the upcoming residents and growth. the second piece, i think we do actually get to thinking about if bill is higher density. that bill is generating more demand for transit and contributing at a higher rate. the per square foot is a proxy for number of people or number of jobs, either residents or jobs. if you look at the eastern neighborhood fees you will see there is tiering where there is a lot of value and

previous projects that are skeptic to the community and i understand you guys have an important citywide policy with affordability but we're looking at 2 units that are 2 hundred and 50 sfooet e square feet and the other one thousand plus not assessable for anyone to rent i understand we have a challenge and major affordability problem but moving forward this particular development it might be weighing on her shoulders being the fact she's looking at building the user frantically in the richmond i would like you to balance out this citywide policy and start with a smaller developer so thank you very much and i think you may need to legislation late a policy for the small developer thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >> i'm jeffrey currently eagle in the property right now so me and couple of friends college friends moved back in may of last year you can marching needed a permit at about we've lived there short term we don't pay any rent but in return we manage the property and make sure there's no trash and she was getting fined from rats from the city and so after living there after

get the data we'll see some very good progress made on the education accident john mentioned the citywide education strategy we started with the sf pledge and have the larger vehicle i want to the thank paul from the ecology team that focused on helping us there's much more work to do but we can

when the last long-range planning efforts were underway and approved, both the area effort and our citywide plan, we identified starting to tee up what the transit capacity improvements needed to be made to accommodate the growth already underway, we need to partner to define what those are. fortunately, we put together a great scope of work and partnership, mtc ff cta, ffmca -- partnering, we applied for and were successful in receiving $1 million in tiger planning, very cup pentative grant program and put together $1 million in local match coming from each of the partner agencies. we are just concluding starting up activities now and the idea is that this effort will define short, medium and long-term capacity solutions for the corridor and the mini metro rail system. so that's the high level. the action we're seeking today is the authorize us to enter into an agreement with mtc. the lead agency, they have procured a consultant team for the effort. and our contribution is $300,000. we already appreciated those funds to us back at your september board meeting and that appropriation also co