it had appearances by sarah palin and ted cruz, but clayman's wild rant topped the headlines. let's listen. comment on this, john. >> a president who bows down to allah. this president is not a president of we the people. >> no! >> he's the president of his people. i call upon all of you to wage a second american nonviolent revolution, to use civil disobedience and to demand that this president leave town. >> yes! >> yeah! >> to put the koran down. to get up off his knees and to figuratively come up with his hands out. >> my god, that's a hell of a demand. put your hands up, put down the koran, get off your knees and leave town today or else we'll have a nonviolent second american revolution. your thoughts. >> right. and we've elected that president twice. i love the way he throws in figuratively so we can't say that he's inciting violence, but of course he is inciting a kind of violence. also remember, this is the rally where there was a guy with a confederate flag right there. they are outside the home of a black family, outside their home telling them to get out. >> an evic

the suit brought by larry clayman of freedom watch against the obama administration challenged the constitutionality of the bulk collection of phone records and the nsa's authority to do so. tonight the ruling is described by civil liberties group as a setback for the obama administration and the nsa. >> the reasoning is -- it is broad enough that it effectively holds the whole program to be constitutional -- unconstitutional. so i don't think it will be easy for government to argue that this program could continue given that a judge held it is illegal and violated the fourth amendment. >> patrick layhe who introduced the freedom act to end the bulk collection of phone records said americans deserve an open and transparent debate about the constitutionality, efficacy and the appropriateness of the government's dragnet collusion of phone records. and it was found unconstitutional. the decision is on hold pending an almost certain appeal by the justice department where they believe the phone records program is constitutional with judges on the national security courts sharing that opinion, bret. >> we

larry clayman. >> reporter: this isn't his first legal crusade. >> our goal here is to pry open this are now ruled quote/unquote by a president who bows down to allah. >> reporter: last year he filed a lawsuit arguing that barack obama couldn't be president because, quote, neither mr. obama nor the democratic party of florida, nor any other group has confirm that mr. obama is a natural born citizen. back in the '90s, he file at least 18 suits against the clinton administration. he's also taken on former vice president dick cheney, facebook, opec, even his own mother. he is a professor of bjorntown university and a former member of george bush's senior staff. he too has been clued by mr. klayman. >> i think larry is a professional claim dlanl. he pretends he's fighting for the little guy when he is really fighting for himself and his own, in my opinion, delusions of grand you're. >> he has been at it for years. he founded the conservative government watch dog group, a group he later sued. yesterday's nsa ruling was a huge victory for klayman. a victory applaud by edward snowden who sa

lar lar larry clayman would not have been allowed had michael steele been the chair of the republicanarty because he knows what kind of message that sends to african-americans, what that does for the reputation of the republican party, and he would know to stop it. look, i give the republican party, rnc great credit for correcting the tweet three hours later, but the problem is the tweet went out in the first place. >> there's a sense some corners of the republican party believe racism is over. >> we're the real racist if we say there's a problem with racism. >> that's the racially divisive thing. >> liberal racist. >> because it works for us. the idea on some level someone wants to say, good on you you're trying to engage with black people in detroit. >> absolutely. >> it's almost more insulting to do that in a purely cosmetic sort of marketing fashion as jonathan explains than substantively, which is to rethink policies that disenfranchise minority voters, be they at the voting booth or actual economic policy. >> when it comes to race they are bigots of low expectations. >> yes, the