i don't think hillary clinton's loss was a loss for hillary clinton. i think it was a loss to the nation and i say that because it's not that she lost, it's that donald trump won, and i am not so hard on all the things she didn't do right in her campaign. but there was a clear distinction between the two. donald trump, he showed us that nation can be convinced that his rhetoric and the things he was talking about were just so different than the way that hillary clinton's wag offering them. -- was offering them. host: thanks for the call. we will get a response. guest: i am sorry. couldn't hear him too well. i think she did lose and he did win. when people ask us that question and say did she lose or did he win, i think it's both obviously. people were taken by surprise that he did win, but i think what we detail in this book is basically how she lost and how it was so much more -- so many factors played into her loss that it wasn't just russia, that it was this tension in the campaign, the lack of a message which we detailed early on. fre start of her

clinton: thank you. [crowd chanting "hillary"] sec. clinton: thank you. sec. clinton: thank you. wow. let's do that again. [laughter] [applause] this warm welcome is one of the many reasons that i always appreciate coming to this campus, to this great university. and i am so pleased to have a chance to talk with you today about an issue that has provided as the president said, has really provided the impetus for a lot of the work that is being done here at the university, particularly in the institute that has been the first of its kind anywhere in andworld, studying women security and the contributions that can be made. i'm grateful to the president's visionary leadership and to this university for your commitment to nurturing diplomats, peacemakers and leaders. i'm one of those who thinks we need more peacemakers, diplomats and leaders who are devoted to the ongoing and difficult work of bridging divides, of bringing people together, of trying to find common ground. now some of you may have been , here back in 2011 when we announced the creation of this institute. it came about

you think hillary clinton beat herself?> i think hillary clinton did so many things to damage her own campaign that sunny was not able to beat a flawed candidate in donald trump. and a big part of that was not understanding what was going on in the look toelectorate, same donald trump and bernie sanders were able to tap into. >> in the final chamters of the book, play-by-play from election night. how clinton apologized to president obama for losing. and making that call to the future president. >> so she calls up donald trump, and she says those words, she never thought she was going to have to say. congratulations, donald. >> tom llamas, abc news, new york. >> emotional moment for her. no doubt. but also for so many of her -- those who loved her and wanted to vote. >> more difficult moment to call president obama and say i'm sorry. going to church on 420, of course. ♪ i love you, basement guest bathroom. your privacy makes you my number 1 place... ...to go number 2. i love you, but sometimes you stink. ♪ new febreze air ef

clinton campaign.y favorite part of the book and what i feel most invested in was the effort we went to to really talk to a lot of people about what was going on. we have a three to four location tick-tock with what hillary clinton and her team members were at. some people were really crunching numbers and talk to people out in the state where they were all working. the brooklyn headquarters had people there as well and of course the victory party or planned victory party location. we spent a tremendous amount of time trying to piece together what happened, trying to get the time element. there are a lot of things in the book have that have not appeared anywhere else. we were afraid someone else would report it that hillary clinton was urged to concede before she did on election night. there is is a lot more about story, what was going on , what the emotions were, what the debates were among her staff and family. for me, that's the part i was most proud of that we got all this reporting that no one els

the clinton campaign, shattered.'s thumbing through it and there's a lot of good juicy tidbits in here so we bring our political experts back to weigh in. column is at the "washington examiner" pretty good to have you guys back. the thing that really jumps out at me when you look at all of this is the question if they had done anything differently could hillary clinton have one? >> there were so many things i could've done better, i suppose it would've been worth a try. you read this book and i appreciated the authors were being respectful and that they were grateful but the details that are packed in there, this thing was a garbage fire on a train that was going into a nuclear waste dump. it is such a tragedy and it is amazing to think that a human being who is smart and it's amazing to think that a person of that level of intellect was able to run two of the worst national presidential campaigns in history in one lifetime. >> martha: how did that happen happen? >> clearly, they ran a campaign that was trying to be

hillary clinton might have one if that hadates happened last year. we might've been talking about a democratic president and set of all of this anger. senate mind there are 10 democrats who are up for reelection in states that trump 2018 midterms. and you wonder, will those seven democrats, a lot of them tend to be more conservative democrats, generate the same enthusiasm that john off box in this one has. is running in a race that many thought republicans should have one. and she is considering a house run. how serious is she? republicans12, nominated a lot of very suave candidates. voters were running away as if they had fleas or the plague. but now they are nominating much stronger candidates from red states. in wagner is one of them from missouri. in wagner is one in missouri. also, montana. up for reelection in a state donald trump one by 42 points. democrats have their work cut out for them. when we talk about heading into 2018, the enthusiasm favors democrats but the map favors republicans. in the senate, it democrats have three quarters of th

a devastating new look at hillary clinton's campaign has the clinton campaign a bit fired up. we've got their first response to the controversial new book. and some real news that is straight out of seinfeld. >> why couldn't you make me an architect? you know i always wanted to pretend that i was an architect of the. >> we promise, we're not going to yada yada yada over the best part. this is "mtp daily" and it starts right now. >> good evening. we begin tonight with more questions piling up about this administration's foreign policy. what are they trying to say? what are they trying to show? especially in hot spots. moments ago, prurp wrapped up a press conference after meeting with italy's newest prime minister. he did not tip his hand with regard to north korea. he was asked about kim jong-un's mental stability but he didn't take the bait. on iran there was a lot more bluster, especially when it came to the nuclear deal. they said vann in compliance and president trump sound ad different tone. >> as far as iran is concerned, i think they are doing a tremendous disservice to

and every -- here's something true of hillary clinton, bill clinton and barack obama. your friends in the press. this is what every bus i have had, your friends in the press. >> bush called them my people. >> your people. yeah. so that's a big thing. your people. so you have to -- but it is -- you understand that is part of your job not just because you've got to service the press but you're ultimately -- you're just constantly trying to keep your side out of trouble. where's the line between overresponding to buying into the premise of a processes story that the press are pushing that is damaging your white house, like where's the line between let's ignore it and try to make -- and wait for it to run its course, or we're compounding our problem by not engaging and trying to figure out when you engage and when you don't. that's the constant battle that's going on. >> on the best days, did president clinton or president obama like the press, understand the press more? >> president obama i guess. the -- president obama would get -- i mean, president clinton -- i guess --

if it's the clintons, bill clinton always show utter respect for the white house? not in the minds of a lot of conservatives. i hope this is a one day story and we can move on to more important things. >> but the difference between snl and calling the president of the united states a subhuman mongrel. >> oh, that was totally out of bounds. his language is horrific. he said a lot of things that shouldn't be out there in public print. is it -- i agree with the point -- he's not a classy guy to have in the white house, but does he have the right to invite whoever he wants in there? >> yeah, that's how a lot of rich people get in there. you may not like it very much, but they're important to the president's political life. >> sarah palin was on with jake tapper earlier, here's what she said. >> president trump called to invite, just to touch base, ask me to get to d.c. and we'd be able to chat over dinner, and ask if i would invite a couple fiends. >> so you brought kid rock and ted nugent? >> jesus was booked so i invited my buddies, bold, courageous all american dude

of clinton -- i'm's are, the victory of trump was not equally as bad as it would've been if clinton hadt. it is a catastrophe. it is utter catastrophe. those who are poorest, those who are already most vulnerable, are the ones are suffering most as a result. we ate seen nothing yet. started.ust getting starr and with gorsuch coming on supreme court and the possibility of the legislative filibuster will be abolished as well as the supreme court filibuster -- if that will give trump and the radical republican right, who now control the congress, essentially absolute power. the only thing standing in their way will be some federal judges, which means within the system, there will be no blocking power. there will be nothing to stop them. in that case, the only way to stop them will be from outside the federal system, which means in the streets or from the systems of the states and localities. we are in the midst of a right-wing revolution. i agree a lot of this discussion isut russia and leaks misguided a lot of it, and it is diverting attention from two main facts. one, we're in the midst

in fairness, the russians gave money to hillary clinton. they gave money to the foundation and got the silicon valley deal. there was actually potentially theoretically in exchange. there was no exchange with trump if they help him locate using power and first thing he does is increase military spending. what kind of deal is that? >> the other thing i wanted you to talk about a little bit is the white working class because i know in the buck you talk about how you pick this up and i was picking it up from the reporter's standpoint on how hillary clinton was just completely missing the problem she was having in the rust belt states they were confident they were going to win pennsylvania. the litany was the always talked about winning pennsylvania but they almost never did. and of course florida is a different area of the country that that happened in the working class. i know in the book i actually put a little tag on it because i'm from a working-class background myself and i know you said people had been overlooked, despised, taken for gra

president clinton. [applause] pres. clinton: good morning. i'm so glad to see all of you here.oke up before dawn this morning. when i got up just at dawn, i already saw the easter bunnies walking around and plotting their strategy for the day. getting ready. i want to thank everybody who worked hard on this. and all the people who helped to sponsor it. and mostly, i just want to welcome all the families here here,l the boys and girls and to thank all of you for being a part of this wonderful, american tradition. i hope you have a terrific time today. i assure you that we are having a terrific time having you here. and i think we ought to start. are you ready to start? [applause] pres. clinton: we have to get everybody lined up. line them up for the first roll. now everybody, let me just say -- everybody who is here will get a -- all the children who are here, not every adult -- on the children who are here will get a souvenir egg. ok? mrs. clinton: and some of them have been signed by socks. pres. clinton: and some of them were signed not just by the first lady and me, some of

to clinton. employee and was never subject to disclosures or ethic rules. jordan was the man that clinton turned to to keep secretive for his affair of monica lewinsky. he obtained a job for her in new york before that was derailed. press and investigative reporting. i would like c-span to be more fair. being savage. mostly by the left-wing press but also by c-span. host: we are being fair to trump and all others. this is a reflection of what others are saying and we are fair and that -- and you are a part of this. your thoughts about jared kushner and ivanka trump and their role inside the west wing? caller: good morning. i think with the rhetoric going on, i think his daughter and son-in-law are the only people that he can trust. and as far as his wife going to the white house? to have her son finish out his school year, which i think is fair. ivanka trump is not being paid. and complaining about the money trump'sy are spending, wife, what about hillary clinton? she built and annex on her prope

-- nomination she could cleanup easily berger there is a much different perspective ilo was never clinton country she increased per-share from under 30% plus i'd like obama verdi was tailor-made for iowa olmert most light blue with colleges most working-class cities that was hillary showing strength. white couldn't see the difference? it was just a routine of television and personalities "meet the press" host declared it obama the winner but another sign to camp down those that pivotal moment of his wife's political career. hugh a with a walk to relieve the stress and 1.played cards he was a concern has spent now he had his pent-up frustration at his longtime friend and advisor. >> two, walked into that the trading space the down the man he was looking for proper. bespectacled in his mid-40s the communications director from dawn till sacked to run the iowa operation. as of former aide to tom harkin and he knew a better than anyone. he said he'll go in there and deal with him. he gathered himself to see the former president of the weathered care he was wearing a suit is arms recrossed even

he gave new details about how intense the attack was on the clinton campaign. in one month long period from march 10th to april 7th, he testified hackers working if the russian military service made personalized specific attacks on 109 different staffers from the clinton campaign. 109 different staffers targeted in that one month. jake sullivan, one top clinton adviser got hit 14 times alone last march, 14 separate attacks by russian military intelligence, all personally tierld specifically to him to compromise his data just in one month. we've now got this good understanding how the hard democratic party and the clinton campaign got hit by russia. russians really targeted them. they really really tried hard to hurt hillary clinton and help donald trump during the presidential general election. but what we did not necessarily get before is that the russians reportedly didn't help trump just win the election, they helped him win the ren nomination as well. >> through end of 2015 and start of 2016, the russian influence system began pushing themes and messages se

and bill clinton and barack obama because i think what you're saying is valid about the clintons. the press had no like for the clintons and i think was reciprocated. with barack obama it was totally different. the press with soft on barack obama. they were hard on the clinton even harder on donald trump in my estimation. look, in 2013 halfway through the obama diminishing the atlantic magazine did a store that show 24 journalist, not columnist, not editorial writers, working journalists went into the obama administration, linda douglass, jay carney. do you know what it's like to be a press secretary on the phone with a reporter asking legitimate newsworthy stories only to realize later that reporter entered the administration against those ideas that you hold? divorcee we are fair for me to pick up due. with 24 went went into the obama administration. it reminds the other side that live in 2008 between hillary and obama. the press loves now to cover sudden alive when it ridicules donald trump will remember in the skit with at the debate between barack obama and hillary clinton an

in other words, clinton took on trump's role and trump took on clinton's role and clinton won re-creating what donald trump sa said. they said they expected misogyny to cause hillary clinton to lose the race but actually it was hillary clinton's word. >> who won the debates? a lot of people in the media and people i know thought hillary clinton won and i don't want to spend the whole half hour on someone who is no longer and probably never will be a candidate for office again. but you know, i don't know about the university experiment. of course, just as with the other things. >> should ann culter be allowed to speak at berkeley? >> we have a debate about free speech going on and there is hate speech advocating against other people's rights. fem fem does come up on social media. i don't know what she is going to say and i know people at the university, my alma matter, want to prevent violent confrontations. it as a complicated thing. are they trying to prevent ann culter or a riot? those might be different things. in general, you know, i believe in people's right to free speech but advoca

voters. >> analytics was something that angered bill clinton. he was saying, i'm getting a different feel on the ground. he was reporting back to brooklyn and saying something doesn't feel so right. they were so reliant on data and analytics they were reporting something back to him. he was always sounding the alarm, raidsing the red flag. >> did you notice during the campaign your anecdotal was different than your statistics? i kept getting it at the end, my brother and people. i keep hearing things, they should be for trump, the pro-life people showing up. this doesn't fit with the numbers we had been getting from the experts. >> that's when we found in the reporting of the book, we for a long time had difficulty with this gap between the sort of stories we were reporting a and the fact that she was up in the polls, which is why we say, we expected ler her to rin on elec night. >> a guy in pennsylvania said if you poll with a real person, hillary won by. if you do a robo-voice, trump won by 3. people were find when they have an articulate pers

amie parnes: clinton was furious about that. and made it known, sounding the alarm that when he was campaigning that was getting a different feel on the ground and he was questioning why he was being sent to a number of places when he should have been sent to what he thought were the opposite in fact. , so he was really kind of bothered by it. soledad: how its feels versus how it is reading on paper. jonathan allen: the data analytics were used as a decider, as one of the sources told us in the book, used a decider not a tool, they used that to determine all kinds of things including where to send , candidates. one of the things they lost out on, or one of the things they were driven toward because they were so focused on the data was to turn out clinton supporters instead of persuading people. president clinton wanted to go out and talk to people who weren't with her and try to make the case for her. data analytics folks told him it was a waste of time. soledad: jonathan allen and amie parnes, appreciate it. both: thank you so

he gave new details about how intense the attack was on the clinton campaign. in one month long period from march 10th to april 7th, he testified hackers working if the russian military service made personalized specific attacks on 109 different staffers from the clinton campaign. 109 different staffers targeted in that one month. jake sullivan, one top clinton adviser got hit 14 times alone last march, 14 separate attacks by russian military intelligence, all personally tied specifically to him to compromise his data just in one month. we've now got this good understanding how the hard democratic party and the clinton campaign got hit by russia. russians really targeted them. they really really tried hard to hurt hillary clinton and help donald trump during the presidential general election. but what we did not necessarily get before is that the russians reportedly didn't help trump just win the election, they helped him win the ren nomination as well. >> through end of 2015 and start of 2016, the russian influence system began pushing themes and messages seek

it's no different than clinton or jfk or anybody else. since they were liberals, they get celebrated. trump gets attacked for it. the hypocrisy beyond -- >> if you stuff your face full of the fatiest foods, it's got the for you or the family. if he's only watching media who tell him he's the best, it's got the for him or the country. >> and to that point i hear -- and it was quoted in the article that -- and i don't have the quote right here but they only provide him with mostly local news clips in the morning because they're more favorable of him. >> normally you get these clip el -- clipbings from local tv and newspaper. i think it's important to get a wide variety. but either pro trump or sympathetic to trump, they play a really vital role in trying to show the president and his supporters what's really going on. what are not promises delivered and what are works in progress. >> his pruvl rating is 42%. his approval rating among those who voted for him is in the 90s -- i think it's 96% -- it says 94% in that poll. do you think conserva

hillary clinton. she said she advised obama officials to seek as much information as they can about trump and his team, parade that information around, get it to capitol hill where leaks geometrically rise. >> i was urging my fellow colleagues. it was telling the hill people, get as much intelligence you can before president trump leaves the administration. >> if there was anything extremely bad having to do with anything of the president's staff, it would have come out because it was their goal to get those leaks out there. this is not the case. this is far more sinister. the fact that the mainstream media is not even covering this and disclosing the journalists who used to work for the administration. liz: let's switch gears and get to the neil gorsuch vote. we have senator jeff merks rkley going on a marathon diatribe. tweeting quote dems and merrick garland ship has sailed. let it go. cher is referring to the block of the obama pick merrick garland. even cher is saying enough is enough. >> if cher

they are at least the most democratic not named hillary clinton or barack obama. when times change, especially when times change radically, you never quite know who's going to become the new center of the political universe. in the few short scandal-ridden weeks of the trump administration, we have grown some new household name democrats as a country. they're starting to get pretty famous on their own. like this previously obscure california congressman, adam schiff. adam schiff is the top democrat on the house intelligence committee. most folks could not have picked him out of a lineup this time last year. but adam schiff has fast become one of the highest profile people in his party. not necessarily because people look at him and think, hmm, president schiff, although maybe some people do think that, i think more the reason he's become so prominent in the past few weeks, in the past couple of months is because of the sense that when the white house turns on the tv and sees adam schiff there talking, important people in the white house with secrets to hide start

at least not named hillary clinton or barack obama. when times change, especially when times change radically, you never quite know who's going to become the new center of the political universe. in the few short scandal-ridden weeks the trump administration has existed, we have grown some new household name democrats as a country. they haven't eclipsed the famous ones but they're starting to get pretty famous on their own. like this previously obscure california congressman, adam schiff. he's the top democrat on the house intelligence committee. most folks could not have picked him out of a lineup this past year. but he's fast become one of the highest profile people in his party. not because people think of him as president schiff, although maybe some people do think that. i think more the reason he's become so prominent in the past few weeks and couple of months is because of the sense that when the white house turns on the tv and sees adam schiff there talking, important people in the white house with secrets to hide start grinding

what hillary clinton said and say hillary clinton said this.we don't name the sources and that allows us to be much more candid about what's going on, particularly before the election. if they knew they had that protection they weren't going to talk to us before the election and we wanted to be able to measure this throughout the process and see what they were saying in 2015 versus 2016 and of course after the election. i think it really allowed us to get sort of under the hood with this campaign and find out both the things that went poorly and the things that went well and i think what we've got as a result of it is not only a very interesting and compelling story but also a lot of lessons for future candidates both on the democratic side and the republican side. >> amy, if i were to distill this several hundred page book into a paragraph, it would be this paragraph. the context here is back and forth between bill clinton and robbie mook in terms of the way they each see the campaign. mook's response to bill clinton was always a variation on

there was a piece in your book where it talks about bill clinton not wanting hillary clinton to apologizeor the server. and to rather explain it. explain that a little bit. >> yeah, you know, there was a lot of debate about what she needed to do with the e-mail issue. and it took up a lot of oxygen that sumner 2015. they were trying, she had just launched her campaign, big speech at roosevelt island. they couldn't quite get their message across. it was completely overshadowed by e-mail. so there was this big debate internally about what they do and how they handle it. i think they both thought for a while they shouldn't apologize, that what they did was above level and that they didn't really need to do that. and i know a lot of her aides were kind of pushing them in the direction and felt that they should acknowledge it and apologize. finally they got to a place where they had to because i think she had to acknowledge it and move on and put it behind her and continue on with her campaign. but it was like a source of frustration, i think, for a while particularly that summer. >> yeah. and

clinton was unhappy about the campaign.yes man or reinforcing her. he was telling her you've got to appeal more to white working class voters. you can't just depend on the college educated and on the traditional democratic constituency. i don't know what the book says about bill clinton, but i do know he was calling people and complaining about the campaign. i don't think he was simply a ra ra guy for hillary. >> give me one second. i think we're getting breaking news. i want to get over to brian stelter right now. he's got some breaking news with regard to the story, the nationwide manhunt that we've all been following so closely since sunday of that facebook murder suspect, here is a tweet that i'm going to read for you from the pennsylvania state police right now. this is the first time. steve stevens was spotted this morning by psp members in erie county after a brief pursuit stevens shot and killed himself. the time stamp on that is almost just before 9:00. the monitor is really far away. i'm not going to pay attention

these are the people hillary clinton lost.it's no surprise donald trump spends a fair amount of time with coal miners lined up behind him. that's not unintentional. is tom perez the right guy to bring back those voters to the democrat party? >> i have a hard time seeing that because tom perez is very much the face of the democratic establishment in washington. he's been part of the problem as voters see it for a very long time. and so the notion that they would put him as the face of the democratic party is almost as absurd as keeping around people like nancy pelosi and chuck schumer as the heads of their respective chambers in congress. when they have been clearly part of the problem for a very long time. it's so easy to forget the past eight years president obama was viewed as a success largely because he won re-election and because the press loved him and he got great press coverage. what was forgotten but revealed by donald trump's massive stunning victory for these people was the fact democrats lost over 1,000 seats natio

the clinton folks, the clinton machine was ready to go. now that that has failed, there are all these deep roots in the party or someone new wants to step up and say i'm the captain now. elizabeth warren may be one of those people, there are lots of folks all competing to fill this vacuum that has not been left. >> dana: what do you think? i don't think the clintons will ever be frowned upon for the democratic party, because obviously they have so many roots and stomach over the decades. are they trying to figure out a way to move left or move forward, what's the next move? >> clearly the head of the party is secretary tom perez, who was just selected to be our party chair and his deputy jamie harrison. we expect exciting things out of them. secretary clinton's legacy get cemented not only as an american leader but as a global leader. her place in the annals of not only american, but world history is very secure. senator warren knows that. i don't think she said anything disrespectful to second clinton's legacy last night. i think that whe

inside hillary clinton's doomed campaign. through deep access, jonathan and amy have reconstructed the opportunities missed and the hidden thorns that turned a winnable contest into a devastating loss. although the clinton campaign was widely covered and many

the fact of the matter is that the clintons, quote, shut down the clinton global initiative in anticipationg. the last cgi was in september and they weren't going to do it anymore. the same should have been true for ivanka trump's brand. she ould have sold it and fully dwivested from it. this white house has standards that don't meet what most people think is appropriate. >> kristen, you talked about why people elected donald trump. where is the conservative world about essentially trump's running the country as if we're one of those countries governed by an entire family. >> americans don't like royal families. to jash yashar ali's point, wha republicans were so upset and outraged, they didn't want this nepotism and lack of transparency. it's interesting this conservative populist base that swung to donald trump, their ears perked up with syria bombing because many agreed with america first policy, focusing on domestic issues and not getting involved. their ears started to perk up and say, maybe this guy isn't exactly who we thought he was. i think they will be watching this all very close

their -- part of hillary clinton's narrative for better or worse was that she was steady. i think some voters looked at that as her being the status quo but against donald trump whom was a disrupttory an antiestablishment who had three different campaign managers during his campaign, they really didn't want it to get out there this idea the clinton people didn't want it to get out there this idea that she was firing people so they said sort of quietly did >> i think that's one of the things that surprised me most is that the public face or what we saw from this campaign was absolutely the opposite, you know, when you guys talked to folks and found out what was going on behind the scenes. how did some of those staffers describe the mood of what it was like to you?

chelsea clinton is 37 years old. award. >> tucker: no doubt you will. >> why would we give her lifetime award at 37. >> tucker: why give her this award. i'm open-minded? why give her this award. what has she done to warrant it? >> i need to provide your viewers with contest. every spring variety hosts a power. we select women who we think should be honored to influence on charitable organizations that do good in the world. last year we had your former colleague megyn kelly as one of our honorees on the cover of variety. in this year in addition chelsea clinton jessica. lively used their power to shed light on important cause. >> tucker: you are making my exact point. megan kelly is from upstate new york. everything she has made herself. that's true with the other women. whether you agree with her politics or not. they did a lot. chelsea clinton has been a documentary filmmaker. >> she is producer for documentary films. >> tucker: she had a paying gig on "the today show." professor at ivy league college. >> has she hi

when it comes to the clinton legacy they've been the leaders of the democratic party from bill clinton's presidency and through the campaign you had the obama moment where you had a new culture and group of people at the helm of the democratic party but the clinton machine was ready to go and now that that's failed there were new roots in the party and someone is waiting to step up to say i'm the captain now. elizabeth warren is one of those people and people lining up to fill the vacuum left. >> i don't think the clintons will ever be frowned upon by the democratic party because obviously they have so many roots over the decades but are they trying to figure out a way to move left or forward? what's the next move. >> clearly the head is tom perez and his deputy jamie harrison. we expect exciting things from them. clinton's legacy is cemented as an american and global leader and her history is cemented and i think when we consider the bubble of d.c. it's important to consider the leadership of our democratic party not only tom perez and in d.c. and in dynamic levels like individuals in s

we'll talk about that plus clinton campaign drama gripping details about hillary clinton's election night phone call with president obama and why he pressured her to concede. we will have msnbc's first interview with the author of a new book chronicallying what went wrong with the clinton campaign. jack be nimble, jack be quick, jack knocked over a candlestick onto the shag carpeting... ...and his pants ignited into flames, causing him to stop, drop and roll. luckily jack recently had geico help him with renters insurance. because all his belongings went up in flames. jack got full replacement and now has new pants he ordered from banana republic. visit geico.com and see how affordable renters insurance can be. there's nothing more than my vacation.me so when i need to book a hotel room, i want someone that makes it easy to find what i want. booking.com gets it. they offer free cancellation if my plans change. visit booking.com. booking.yeah. >>> at this hour, president trump is on his way to wisconsin. he departed washington last hour. he is set to speak in paul ryan's district, which is