and >>> basically because we are doing a cmgc, we have the ability to award an individual packages rather than one huge one. in some of them may not start work for a year or so, but there is a long time of fabrication that especially steel work. we need to get that particular package out. we want to make quite certain by this time next year we have bid and received packages. it is not just an estimate, now we know where we are. >> thanks. the other larger point, looking at the funding plan and seeing the 2.6 needed for phase 2 that we still have 1.9 or nearly 2 billion of tbd and given the larger dynamics with regard to high-speed rail, i am wondering if we should have a broader conversation here about what is happening with high-speed rail and what the impacts are for this project, what the more and that the outlook for phase 2 funding and how these things relate? just like the redevelopment dissolution was the internal inject that change our assessment if high-speed rail were not to continue as planned, that would change the context and assumptions under which the project is moving forw