is the constitution is.ven quite tall, indians have been able to borrow into that diffusion to establish what was, you can't do in britain. because it's not the optimist they happen to increase single.. and i think that is particularly given the speed british state stays closed . >> let me move question onthe words of the modern english title . because you understand the damage to advocate opportunities. were there any critical of the idea of the constitution itself or if you found it more useful, how were you posted this in your post is also relative safety is wonderful. >> that you as a theoretical question which i will not remotely discuss with you. i knew the modern world in my subject and i realize. [inaudible] because so many of my excess were references to the modern world and constitutions -- [inaudible] constitutions did however submit to languages, to the e identity where they were in a modern i and in my penultimate chapter i proposed a chinese radical lowering successful were saying 1812, that's

in what ways do you believe the written constitution has advantages over unwritten constitutions?>> the difference is often more rhetorical and many politicians [inaudible] conversely of course in the uk but there are lots of important [inaudible] they are available to tell interested citizens [inaudible] [inaudible] with the most. >> yes. picking up on these words they advocate modernity or is there any access itself or if it is more useful rather than ask those categories. thank you for this wonderful talk. >> that again is a huge theoretical strategy. i use the modern word and realize it is almost a clichÉ because there are many using references for the most [inaudible] to be identified and i credit saying it is now clear no state can be modern and suspect full without a written constitution. that isn't necessarily true. that said, to define what the state is and again it ultimately failed but one of the things is the aspect of their own indigenous culture to have their cities and also saying we have a constitution. you can see they don't realize it in the way that it is now th

are the original constitution and the founders constitution rooted in the natural rights and doctrines of the declaration of independence and then almost immediately many times since then since it was promulgated in 1787 and 1788 the constitution of national rights limited government, separation of powers traditional constitutional structures. that american history discloses. the other constitution, the competing constitution is the progressives that other progressives and people in your field have adopted. but it up on - - implies none too subtly as the alternative to a dead constitution or at least on life support. and it is a constitution of evolutionary rights essentially group based and historically based rates for all constitutional structures to be changeable and adaptable and therefore the government to go into the business of experimenting to cure the latest social and economic distresses. and this is one too many they inflict increasingly that polarization that deepening divisions. connected to the underlying political and philosophical differences. it has gotten worse as tim

constitutional or how can regulation antitrust and other kinds also be squared with a constitutional system that lacks such things for the first 125 years or so. i am sympathetic to the attempt to figure out what marginal changes can be made to address the real problems of the age. but don't do permanent or extensive constitutional damage along the way. that was the debate going on in the first couple of decades of the 20th century among come among progressives among everyone but i think that is the right question to ask. without changing constitutional fundamentals , what reforms could usefully be made to the national regulatory apparatus of the country? they were feeling their way forward. what i focus on in the book is not the fight at the margin over what you can should be done, but rather the wholesale change in ideas underlying the whole debate which moves the debate away assuming the existence of certain constitutional fundamentals and what can we do given the separation of powers given federalism? but rather a new spirit called the new freedom from the old constitutional arra

the two constitutions are the original constitution, what i call the founders constitution. rooted in the natural rights doctrines of the declaration of independence and amended almost immediately and many times since then after it was promulgated in 1787 but that is the constitution of natural rights, limited government, separation of powers, the traditional constitutional structure and principles that american history discloses to us. the other is a competing constitution what i call the progressive constitution that goes by the name of the living constitution which is a term that wilson began to use 100 years ago and that many other progressives and especially people in your field mpjurisprudence have adopted. but the living constitution implies none too subtly that the alternative is a dead constitution or at least one that is on life support. and the living constitution, the progressive constitution is a constitution of evolutionary rights, group -based and historically based rights which emphasizes the needs for all constitutional structures to be changeable and adapta

happy about the current model and ok with the current constitution so they will be. holding off on blocking a lot of proposals from the more progressive agenda that's 9 months now it's a quite a short period so we have to see what happens there if they don't make it in 9 months they get another additional 3 months to finish their constitution but it's all it needs to be done in one year it is not the only one yet it will need to develop a new constitution as it is in theory if everything does go to plan the people of chile will have another chance to vote again on the new constitution and the laws but in your opinion where do you see you might say the disagreements in the lead up to that vote because no process is perfect and one wonders whether you know women's issues or the issue of indigenous groups could actually be quite contentious in the long. that's true but i think the rights are progressive something in the new constitution will be an improvement of the old constitution was written in the eighty's although as has been amended lots of times there are 13 thin

. 50 this new convention for the new constitution.— constitution.what do you think are going to _ constitution. so what do you think are going to be - constitution. so what do you think are going to be the - think are going to be the biggest changes we will see from the current constitution? well, first of all, this is a new platform, an official institution that will see, people will be able to speak up about these issues, and be heard about pensions, health system, education and said, inequality, which is in the core of chilean society as it is most latin american countries.— it is most latin american countries. ., ' . countries. how difficult will this process _ countries. how difficult will this process be? _ countries. how difficult will this process be? to - countries. how difficult will this process be? to get - this process be? to get agreement among the delegates on the issues that you have mentioned there are? there is auoin to mentioned there are? there is going to be — mentioned there are? there is going to be a _ mentioned there are? th

constitution not a constitution dictated by other people. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. and for more i'm now joined by my colleague a benjamin of it as a group or who is following this story for us benjamin we've heard this vote is considered the most important in chalets recent history can you tell us why exactly it's considered crucial it's the most important vote this whole process since the return of democracy 31 years ago this will be the new framework for the country in 4050 years and what's a story that all the members of this assembly under $55.00 members of them will be woman and there will also be reserved seats for the indigenous population and that's a 1st worldwid

welcome to the national constitution center on constitution day. the best day of the year here to be here. joining me onstage as vince just said, are people closely related to three landmark supreme court cases the law took place of the twins says to, so not that long ago. and that is program what will do is all introduce each of our panelists, they'll tell you a little bit of the background of the supreme court case in which their father, or john's case, where themselves involved in the case but talk about with the court ruled, how it impacted our lives and why those cases are still relevant today. our first speaker, to my left is karen. karen is the founder and executive director of the fatigue court -- established in 2009. and the daughter of the late fred, the petitioner in the landmark supreme court case, komatsu versus united states. since her father's passing in 2005, karen has carried on fred's legacy as the civil rights advocate, public speaker and public educator. she shares her passion for social justice and education and k-12 public and

the outcome of the vote will play a key role in shaping chile's new constitution. i'm joined now by my colleague benjamin their group were benjamin what's at stake for chile this weekend there is a lot of stake in the hopes of a really high because this is a way of scrapping the current constitution that they'd spac to the time of the military dictatorship and replacing it with a new framework of this $155.00 members that will be elected this weekend with a half of them women and also elected seats for the indigenous population that is truly in story now explain to us a little bit because you know chile is known as the star of south america but there are a lot of problems just bubbling under the surface can you were talking were some of the issues that they're dealing with that's right. even the presidents of us simply knew no one set the chile comparing it to other countries in the region was an oasis and that's definitely not the case the code covered 1000 pandemic has shown that there are severe problems of poverty of inequality of overcrowding of people that ne

both the constitution of 1787 and the second constitutional regime, the reconstruction of it.the fact of the matter is there was a fight over the 13th and 14th amendment, and the 15th amendment. they were all matters of compromise. they have good points to them and they have bad points to them. i don't think, i'm not satisfied with the 13th amendment, i'm not satisfied with the 14th amendment, or the 15th amendment. obviously, my comments indicate that i'm critical of the supreme court of the united states and the way it's handled those amendments, but the supreme court of the united states is not the only culprit. the framers of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, they have their own problems. the society that gave us the 13th, 14th, 15th amendments were thoroughly really racist. it should not be surprising that the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendment should be limited. it would be extraordinary if that were not the case. now to go to your question about the 14th amendment, particularly the second section. the section having to do with voting, a couple of points. one, it is a sec

drafting this new constitution but of course a constitution itself will not solve all the problems in the country in the other reforms that we'll need and that are really important as well for example of the police that has been heavily criticized for human rights violations during the protests so the hopes are really high that there will be a new chapter in chilean history and 10 seconds are people animated is a less of an animated and they know that this is a way of channeling the social and protests in the country to a new way to this new constitution benjamin gruber thank you so very much all eyes on chile this weekend we should. and that was the day as ever the conversation continues online you'll find us on twitter edu w news saying you can reach out to me if you want to at a rock pick up shop. well you ready for some great news i'm christine one glass on the guy on the edge of my geo with a brand new in the deep of the news africa this show that tackles the issues changing the continent now with more time to off on an in-depth look after all of the friends of the talk to you wh

drafting this new constitution but of course a constitution itself will solve all the problems in the country and the other reforms that will need and that are really important as well for example of the police that has been heavily criticized for human rights violations during the protests so the hopes are really high that there will be a new chapter in chilean history and 10 seconds are people animated it's a lot of enthusiasm made it and they know that this is a way of channeling their social and protests in the country to a new way to this new constitution benjamin gruber thank you so very much all eyes on chile this weekend we should. and that was the day as ever the conversation continues online you'll find us on twitter as you know saying you can reach out to me if you want to at la iraq ticket which. do you like it. do you want to. take that buckle up put the pedal to the metal let's ride. next w. . here. comes startling. news stations at health clinics. has often been in short supply. now it is flowing from town. and says so let's. go. trick or treat it's. a lot of. extra of

the outcome of the vote will play a key role in shaping chile's new constitution. a lot at stake this weekend for chile i'm now joined by my colleague benjamin about ascent gruber thank you so much for being here benjamin good to see you is this chile's moment of real invention it is it is invention not just as a state but also to find this new framework agreement for the next 4050 years it's a way of channeling the social unrest that started in 2019 it's the 2nd part let's remember that there are 3 votes the 1st one was the referendum. 80 percent of chile and said that they want to scrap the current constitution that dates back to the dictatorship of also be noted and now this weekend they will elect their $155.00 members they will have the very difficult task of drafting this new constitution very difficult task was exactly at stake. what's very important to note here is that the difficult challenge starts now for the outside for the for the other countries is interesting to see how many women are involved we just heard about it half of them will be women there w

constitution not a constitution dictated by other people not going to fulfill. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. and for more i'm now joined by my colleague a benjamin of it as a group or who is following this story for us benjamin we've heard this vote is considered the most important in chalets recent history can you tell us why exactly it's considered crucial it's the most important vote this whole process since the return of democracy 31 years ago this will be the new framework for the country in 4050 years and what's a story that all the members of this assembly under $55.00 members of them will be woman and there will also be reserved seats for the indigenous population and that's a 1st worldwid

the constitution may say people but every state read that as men.why whenever a court bothered to address the issue they usually dismiss the concept of women being equal in the eyes of the law as a ridiculous violation of reality for their view women did not have the physical or mental capacities necessary for participation in public life. such a proposal also violated the traditional legal concept of curvature the american understanding of the legal status of women. came from that renowned british legal scholar william blackstone who defined curvature in 1765 to quote by marriage the husband and wife are one person in law. that is the very being or legal. is this existence of the woman is suspended during marriage or at least is incorporated and consolidated to that of the husband under whose wing protection and cover she performs everything. this lack of legal identity was most obvious in her lot lat. excuse me in her loss of her name upon marriage. women did not have rights, but duties a female was to be obedient first to her father and then to h

that is when the constitution was developed. they were concerned, because at that time there were a total of 13 states, or colonies. four of them were very large states, nine more very small states. the majority of the population, if we were to make our constitution to be a popular vote, all they would really care about is the four large states. they had more than 50% of the population. so we had that and that was something that they figured out a way to make sure that they didn't have all of the power in the large states. they call that the creation of the electoral college. keep in mind, that has been 230 years ago. it existed all of that time. anyway, we used the electoral college to secure the rights of people in smaller states. we understand that. the democrat presidential nominee, this is something that surprised me when i first thought about it. when you hear people talk and ask questions, the minute, why are we concerned with that and why was the electoral college so important and should not be the standard popular vote?

constitution not a constitution dictated by other people none of. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. in the bundesliga brasier dortmund knew that a win over hosts minds would sweep them into the champions league next season instead of frankfurt and minds already clinched their survival in the same league and it looked like their minds were on their summer vacation as dark and eased to victory. dortmund might have expected an easy raid against the might side with 5 changes and little to play for and there was certainly enough chumminess before kick off to make frankfurt funds weapons. and their fears were realized on 23 minutes when jason sun she was set up rafael guerrero to curl darkman i

neither of those are in the constitution. second this disables us in the say the right conflict which is something we see everywhere. forces us in the face to erase one right or another and that is alienating to one or the other and think about affirmative-action or abortion rights and the way that courts and the rest of us as well framed them as one right of having to win out over others and third it polarizes or contributes to our oversedation because it turns political concept which should be resolved in the ways that resonate with conflict resolution into legal concepts and treated as binary. that require us to assign constitutional status to one party in a dispute over another. it has a tendency of making us line up on one side or another and allies read or sing and raising the stakes of our political tribalism. what i suggested the book is instead of recognizing only a few rights and presumptive weight absolute rights treating them strongly we should be more generous and recognizing this but treat them pervasively as in

and the constitution still works. think sometimes it's very unpopular when you state it, but it's still there, and it will win eventually. >> we are coming to the end of our program. i do want to say one final thing on this. first of all, folks who are interested in this topic, we have put out a great book called the central electoral college. you can download it as a pdf from our website, for folks who want to distribute these color copies. you can contact us and we will be happy to provide you with those. you all helped us with this and helped endorse it, so i thank you for that. the final thing i want to say about this, and i guess i say this as a first generation american. by parents experienced tyrannical dictatorships. i don't think a lot of americans understand how uniquely stable our government is. for over 230 years, the key is to control of the white house have been peacefully handed over. there has never been a coup d'États. there has never been anyone who has refused to do that. we had violence we shouldn'

but the constitution is there.omething that you can quote and you can come to and say, yes, we want to make sure that we do the constitutional thing because it still works. and i think it's divinely inspired. when you stop and think about the fact that why this is important back when we had 13 colonies and four of them were the large ones. and then coming up a couple hundred years later and it's the same thing, except the numbers change. it's now 50 states but with nine controlling everyone else. it shows why it happened, and there's justification for it. and that's another good answer to the question when they talk about what's constitutional in one man, one vote. the constitution still works, and i know that sometimes it's very unpopular when you state it. but it's still there, and i think we'll win eventually. >> well, we're coming to the -- sorry, we're coming to the end of our program. i do want to say one final thing on this. first of all, for folks who are interested in this topic, we have put out a great bo

but it is but the constitution is there. it's something that you can quote and you can come to and say yes we want to make sure that we do the constitutional thing because it still works. when you stop and think about the fact on why this is important a couple hundred years later it's the same thing. it's now 50 states but with the nine controlling everyone else so it shows why it happened and it makes the case for it and that's another answer to the question. the constitution still works and i know sometimes it's very unpopular but it's still there and i think we will win eventually. >> we are coming to the end of our program. i do want to say one final thing on this. first of all for folks who are adjusted in this topic we have put out a great booklet called the essential elect roh college. you can download it as a pdf from our web site and for folks who want to distribute beautiful color copies just contact us and we'd be happy to provide you with those. trent england you-all helped us with this and helped endorse this so

the constitution is secured.d an 1830, condemned as an see where, the should have been broken up, except for a poem that across the nation. all of our window homes iron sites. long has weaved on high. many has danced to see that banner in the sky. run the battle shout and burst the candidate. or shall we pass the clouds are no more. we're not the vanquished. full when winds were hurrying. waves were right below. no more shall tread. or know the conquered knee. the hard piece of the shore shell pocked the eagle of the sea. mighty deep and there should be our grave. on to the master. holy flag set every thread-bear sail and give her to the god of storms the lightning and the gale. titled, the whole world is watching. [police chatter] >>

constitution not a constitution dictated by other people none of. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. knew that a win over hosts mines would sweep them into the champions league next season instead of frankfurt now minds already clinched their survival in the same league and it looked like their minds were on their summer vacation as dortmund to victory . dortmund might have expected an easy raid against them might side with 5 changes and little to play for and there was certainly enough chumminess before kick off to make frankfurt funds weapons. and their fears were realized on 23 minutes when jason sun sets up rafael guerrero to curl dortmund in front mights his young standing keeper. lef

revere the declaration of the constitution.hate people because of their race or other physical characterizes or anything for that matter. we have an intellectual elite that is stirring the pot that has power in our universities has power in hollywood has power in washington, d.c. they don't live the lives of average people who work with people of another race whether you're working in a restaurant or a grocery store or you're a trucker or electrician or plumber your union nonunion you're a teacher, a police officer, we're working with people of different races and backgrounds all of the time with most diverse magnificent, tolerant country on the face of the earth. but the problem is -- candace that gives an opportunity for those who are not to abuse us. final words from you. >> my final words would be to inspire every single person watching this program to get involved these times are critical but there's no reason to be discouraged, i mean, i'm proof of that. i can't tell you how fearful i was when i made decision to speak out

not just the justices but that the constitution itself. this is a love story for religious freedom and in fact i think this is true of everything i've read beginning with bear country. to love story. the clinton book is a love story for the constitution and the idea of equality before the law. this is a book of a love story about religious freedom so finally to the first question. the three great pence pulse beginning with autonomy going next to and you take this in any sequence you want and then to accommodation. those are three words and we all know what they mean. you may have seen them associated with certain constitutional principles. ken take a few minutes and ran through these through -- three great principles using some of the cases that you use to explain what they mean including the ones that you lost. >> they are weren't that many. there weren't that many. there was one and some that you were involved in even though you weren't before you weren't before there for the court. >> thank you. let me begin -- can you hear us in the ba

not in the constitution but in the case law. the problem was there was no limit to how the test which was a tool, a tool in the toolbox, was being used and so it came into sharp focus in connection with the challenge to legislative challenge. nebraska is a wonderful state but they sometimes give rise to interesting religious liberty questions. a member of the unicameral he only state that has single, governor huckabee show last evening and he said i like the idea of a single legislature, that's very good. very, very good reform. dealing with to make different is hard. nebraska had a unicameral legislature and at a chaplain. a territory but mr. chambers objects to it here it goes all the way up to the supreme court. it's a violation of the establishment clause as interpreted by kurtzman which the primary purpose of having a chaplain? with the primary effect of having a chaplain? what about this committee that's hiring, interviewing candidates for the chaplaincy? reviewing his or her work, excessive entanglement and so forth? the

supporters of a new constitution see it as an opportunity to heal divisions.arantee the rights enshrined in a new constitution. james gatica matheson, international correspondent for a chilean television station, told us more. it is very key to work and be part of this and very historical constitutional convention, there are some of these who will be part of the traditional political parties. there are so many new faces in politics that we have seen, independent candidates and also some seats for indigenous groups and another element is the equality regarding gender that it's going to be included in this election and this new convention for the new constitution. so what do you think are going to be the biggest changes we will see from the current constitution? well, first of all, this is a new platform, an official institution that we'll see, where people will be able to speak up about these issues, and be heard about pensions, the health system, education and as you said, inequality, which is in the core of chilean society as it is most latin american countri

that was one of our special constitution questions. don't hang up, let us get your address, so we can send -- get this on its way to you. i am megan in ohio, shout out to mr. wiggin. can you explain what to expect for the argumentative essay? guest: question number four of the ar cues is the argumentative essay. i don't know what the topics will be, but one is you who -- you will have to create a claim. you have to pick this or that, and make a claim about this or that. do not make a claim about both. then, you have to support your claim with reasoning. make sure you elaborate on that reasoning. support your claim with at least two paragraphs of evidence. one of those paragraphs has to leak to the course document. remember, there are nine documents including the constitution and amendments. you can use at least one of those provided court document -- course document as evidence. for the other, it could be your historical knowledge, something you're starting about, or a conversation from her dinner table. also, you have to provide a con

that is probably constitutional infirmity. presidents have followed the war powers resolution and none have followed on the stopping the action of congress approves. but the war but war has changed. what is war? cyberattack on an election system or pipeline? a drone strike? that didn't used to be war, it was just a drone strike. so we have to grapple with the reality that there are a lot of conceptual issues to bring the war powers resolution up to date. we have to define some foreign issues that have become more complicated. >> and every white hat -- every administration has argued -- host: i'm going to try something a little different. is there a question i should have asked or a question you have of senator young or vice versa? something you think needs to be teased out of this on the politics or policy side? host: -- sen. kaine: i think the stars are lining in an interesting way. you have the democratic president and if there was a republican reluctance to assert article one authority against a republican president, you ha

as a constitutional expert, and master lawyer, ken has served -- argued 36 cases before the u.s. supreme court, including during his service as u.s. solicitor general. he served as united states circuit judge nor district of columbia circuit, as counselor lore and chief of staff for attorney general william french something i and law clerk to bow sleeve justice warren berger and a fifth circuit judge david dyer. as moe of you know he was appointed to serve as independent counsel for five investigations, including whitewater from 1994 to 1999. many of you know ken through this writing. he is author of first among equals, the supreme court in american life, bear country, the baylor story, contempt, a percentage moyer of the clinton investigation which was animation names best sellinger in 2018. -- a "new york times" best seller in 2018 and religious flirt crisis was released this past tuesday and which we celebrate this evening. ken and his wife alice, who is here this evening, great too have you hear, alice -- now's along the peaceful banks the river in waco, texas. we are blessed

constitution. if we recognize threats to freedom when they arise. today we face a threat america has never seen before. a former president, who provoked a violent attack on this capitol, in an effort to steal the election has resumed his aggressive effort to convince americans that the election was stolen from him. he risks inciting further violence. millions of americans have been misled by the former president. they have heard only his words but not the truth. as he continuings to undermine our democratic process, sewing seeds of doubt about whether democracy really works at all. i am a conservative republican, and the most conservative of conservative principles is reverence for the rule of law. the electoral college has voted. more than 60 state and federal courts including multiple judges the former president appointed have rejected his claims. the trump department of justice investigated the former president's claims of widespread fraud and found no evidence to support them. the election is o

let's get back to he said let's follow our constitution. hr one that the democrats are proposed is very flawed. in your constitution it says congress can change the time and manner in which they hold their elections but it only applies to representatives and senators. all this other stuff they have in their is unconstitutional. that does not affect local elections, it does not affect state elections and it does not affect the presidential election. as far as all this stuff about the supreme court turning down these cases, they did not even want to hear it. it wasn't of the supreme court said you're wrong, they just did not hear all of the evidence. we have proof out here the dead people voted, that people that did not live in the district voted. some states even proved that people below 18 years of age voted. host: where do you read about this evidence? caller: where do i read about it? it comes from some of the media, i am no longer on the internet. i listen a lot,oan has had proof after proof of this stuff. this thing that's going on in a

let start with the constitutional. it's undisputed the founding fathers criticism of government with checks and balances. in james madison's words, vision must be made to counteract ambition. unless you think this is abstract, it's the separation of powers that help ensure all of our other liberties. you may be saying, we agree. what does this have to do with the proposals before the committee. one proposal would make inspectors general removable only for cause. even a recent report which examined this issue and the constitutionality of it said it could be questionable to place for cause restrictions on certain ig's who would be insulated from residential control by multiple players of protection. the current bill does not reflect this concern. more to the point, given the uncertainty and separation of powers concerns with the potential damage to the foundation of government, inspectors general are not the only mechanisms that congress has for combating fraud and abuse. congress can subpoena witnesses to appear before

and in other news devotes that will give women more say in rewriting chile's dictatorship erect constitution. israel's bombardment of the gaza strip has now gone on for a weekend shows no sign of ending it has launched a new wave of airstrikes on the palestinian enclave over the past hour the israeli military says they're in response to the latest barrage of rockets hamas fired towards ashkelon on sunday the u.n. security council met to discuss the crisis but was unable even to agree on a joint statement of concern the death toll now stands at 197 palestinians including 58 children 10 people in israel have also died let's bring in our. live for us from gaza it's looking like another tense night soph what after what's already been the deadliest day since the latest escalation tell us about what's happening. on the southern just. 55. shake gaza city we have been learned ducked the targets included several military bases and security bases in gaza. and east of gaza city also next behind the main compound of shifa hospital which is the biggest hospital in gaza city we received information about

you are we want our own constitution our law by us expressing who we are just that the people's constitution not a constitution dictated by other people none of. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. football news now and in the german bundesliga boris he had dortmund who knew that a when of a mind would sweep him into the champions league next season instead of france. already clinched their top flight survival and it looked like their minds were already on some a vacation as stuart went east to victory. dortmund might have expected an easy ride against them might side with 5 changes and little to play for and there was certainly enough chumminess before kick off to make frankfurt funds wince. and their fears were realized on 23 minu

constitution not a constitution dictated by other people none of. those demands could be answered after this series of elections 1st there was a vote last year to draft a new constitution the current election is on who will draw up this document and then mid next year another visit to the ballot box to decide whether or not to adopt the new constitution but it's not expected to be smooth as parties on the left and right battle for their say on the final document. in the bundesliga dortmund knew that a win over hosts minds would sweep them into the champions league next season instead of frankfurt and minds already clinched their survival in the same league and it looked like their minds were on their summer vacation as dortmund to victory . dortmund might have expected an easy ride against the might side with 5 changes and little to play for and there was certainly enough chumminess before kick off to make frankfurt funds when. and their fears were realized on 23 minutes when jason sun to set up rafael guerrero to curl dortmund in front mites as you

convention a new constitution was one of the key demands during months of social protests many hope it will guarantee social rights such as health education and pensions the election is taking place over 2 days latin america and reports on santiago. it's a historic election in more ways than one. it's the 1st time chileans will have a say in the cool write a new constitution and document that will determine the country's economic political and social roadmap. bloodier beddes and her husband believe it's no small feat. this will define our future that's why this day is so special to look under court appointed in order to make the necessary changes to social changes that we've been waiting for for so long that. chileans are also electing mayors governors and city council members but the constitutional vote is regarded as the most significant. the current constitution written 40 years ago under the pinochet dictatorship is regarded by a great many as illegitimate and the source of many of chile's ills for the 1st time anywhere in the world 50 percent of delegates to a constitutional co

to safeguard an important constitutional right. i just heard what senator blumenthal said about those strong due process laws and want to make sure they are always followed. but i also want to say that red flag laws are scarcely the only option for ensuring that persons with mental issues are prevented from engaging in violence or self harm. i turned to some legislation i put in as a bipartisan support called the eagles act of 2021. a commonsense piece of legislation building upon what the secret service successfully does over decades. this bill carries the namesake of the parkland, florida marjory stoneman douglas high school mascot, the eagles. it is a tribute to the 17 eagles who tragically lost their lives three years ago at the hands of a fellow student who struggled with severe behavioral problems and mental health problems. if he had been sent to get help that he had ought to have had, he would have been in a database and unable to purchase a gun. this legislation helps proactively mitigate threats of violence in our country

if you look at the constitution. and the people who have their own organizations in this country and as far as i know. i'm never. on paper this is correct but the reality tells a different story veteran politician on a show where he spent 18 months in prison and is currently an alpha male. he is due to face the high court on charges of treason off to publicly condemning the royal family for corruption and misconduct he says those who call it a democracy are mistaken the revision towards. the news i ses. just recently 2 weeks out of a plane in thing occasions the police detained people. people assembled to bed piers for you and yet we continue to call ourself a democratic kind no we can't we cannot we cannot remain that there must be change in this. song isn't a load in his sentiment while at least 60 percent of swazis live below the poverty line king mswati splashes out on the rolls royces and b.m.w. use among the student wing of the national liberal tory congress emotions fly high when talking politics and current c