as possible. therefore, at the same time, we do not forget about the decision of the constitutional court of ukrainely defined that bilingualism poses a threat to the state language, including, therefore, just as bilingualism can harm the internet, as well as television and radio, as well and of course, we are working to ensure that there is no bilingualism in institutions of general secondary education, we are clear we distinguish the law on the state language, we clearly distinguish the law on indigenous peoples and national communities, but no one is allowed to speculate on this in any way, better opportunities for the state language, better opportunities for the languages ​​of national minorities, but in no way confuse these things, especially in this extremely an important period of time, in the conditions of a full-scale invasion, it is not possible and it is harmful, so we are working for the approval of ukrainian, it is fundamentally necessary. thank you very much, mr. taras, for all that you do, and of course, thank you for participating in live espresso. taras kremin was in touch with us.

of the russian orthodox church in ukraine depends exclusively on him. draft law 82.21 corresponds to the decisions of the constitutional court of ukraine and the supreme court it is exclusively consistent with european legislation in the field of freedom of conscience, judicial practice and recommendations of the european court of human rights. and therefore any citizen who challenges the provisions of our bill, which will become law, will be forced to answer questions first. about how the activity of the russian orthodox church in ukraine serves the national interests of ukraine, defends the ukrainian democratic society against russian aggression, the goal of which is the destruction of the state and the genocide of the nation. my bill is based on the fact that there is already an autocephalous orthodox church in ukraine. therefore , any religious organization can use the word orthodox in its name, only if it subordinated to the orthodox church of ukraine. after all, patriarchal and synodal tomos. was given not only to an individual church , but also to the entire state, because the state is also concerned about receiving it, that is why the verkhovna rada

of ukraine on its website. just spanish sorm. this cabinet should resign. i understood that the authors of the concept had not read the constitution, relevant laws and decisions of the constitutional courtshort - fierce tradition. i reread it twice. at first i thought to recommend. let everyone know immediately, and now i am inclined to the fact that this document is very difficult to meaningfully discuss or criticize, because in places it is devoid of meaning, sometimes there is complete abracadabra. the concept, at first i thought it was some joke, then i found the text itself, they say that it is a real official document, probably written in a hurry in the office of simple solutions. it is interesting that in the metadata of the scandalous document there is a concept of increasing resilience. the date of creation of democracy in ukraine is indicated the day before yesterday, but what are the guarantees that this text is 100% authentic, except for its access authors to the website of the cmu and a mixture of soviet rhetoric behind kuchmiv huts, which is quite expected for the current government, regarding the creation of managed parliamentarism in ukraine. the saddest thing in the his

is a comment on your question about the european court of human rights and so on, first of all there is a decision of the constitutional court of ukraine which must be implemented, and this decision of the court of appeals was accepted : in the spring of this year, it very clearly stated that the church should bear an honest name, and the so-called uoc mp should not be encrypted by this name, its metropolitan is in moscow and it should be called by the russian church, it will be honest, but today they are lying, in fact, to their parishioners , calling themselves the ukrainian orthodox church, having a metropolitan there in moscow and not fulfilling the decision of the ukrainian court, if we talk about the parallel, you know, there is a very interesting decision to make this summer, and precisely by the european court of human rights, when the russian-speaking population of latvia turned there, also regarding the protests that they want to receive education in the russian language, and this should be guaranteed to them, so the decision of the european court of human rights says that really every person has the right to education, but n

you under the transcript, as they say, under the protocol, there is a decision of the constitutional court of ukraine october 17, 2002, which says the following, i will read, the verkhovna rada of ukraine is authorized to adopt laws and exercise other constitutionally defined powers . voting is also a determination of the constitutional authority, provided that the plenary session is attended, at the time of voting, no less than the number of people's deputies of ukraine, which in accordance with the constitution of ukraine is necessary for making a relevant decision. the fourth part of article 89, article 90, the fourth part of article 94, the second, fifth, sixth parts of article 111, the first part of article 135, the first part of article 55, the first part of article 156. that is, ruslan oleksiyovych stefanchuk, if you continue to hold meetings of the verkhovna rada in ukraine, you will violate both laws under which the verkhovna rada of ukraine operates, the constitution of the supreme rada, the constitution of ukraine and the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine. therefore, let's not t

general prosecutor's office, and this is logical, as you can see about nabu, about the constitutional court of ukraine, where, by the way, this is one of the requirements of our application to the european union, and therefore, you know, and as for the concept, well, i read , for example, there is a paragraph about the efficiency of state institutions, yes, we will strengthen the efficiency of state bodies, and then a couple of steps are written there, one of them is through the transformation or reform of wages, well, sorry, i am convinced that no united states states of america, not countries the european union is absolutely not interested in such a small issue as the salaries of our civil servants, they are interested in more general things, about how to make the public service efficient, how to make it politically neutral, for example, yes, and how to do that, if the anti-corruption system was in place, it would work like the state services. bovtsi submitted their declarations, for example, to monitor the way they lead their lives, so that if, well, there are, for example, issues of conflict of in

suspending the effective acts of legislation that contradicts the legal positions of the constitutional court of ukraine, that is, you understand, the law on the state budget, instead of regulating only agreements and expenditures, begins to interfere with other legal acts, this is its one of the main disadvantages. the second story is very important, it is this budget that contains a large number of provisions. just listen so you know what you will or won't vote for, ee from a series of provisions that lead to a significant violation of the parameters of the country's debt security and the maximization of debt risks in the medium and long term, and this is not a question that we take on debt, no, this is another issue that is completely lacking, at least a tentative strategy or plan of actions and measures, regarding the settlement of optimization issues debt strategy and ensuring debt security, that is, we are in debt. but now the government is not thinking at all about what, but at the expense of what and how these debts will be returned. the next important story is precisely this budget law, the ver

rada, you have to ensure the activity of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, we cannot vote even for amendments, because the constitutional courttime prohibited it, and you know it, unfortunately, you violate the constitution of ukraine, i do not know why you do it, and unfortunately, we are seeing a bit of a double whammy, i i understand that you probably can't swim in everything, but when you appealed to the verkhovna rada to start working, it means that the entire verkhovna rada, or rather , the law for all enemies, that's not how it works either, let's finish our work for today, we'll wait until everyone comes and we'll discuss the amendments , many of them are conceptual, we've already gone through some of them while you were gone, oleksandr shergich put them to the vote, that's four 64%, leave it in the communities, pdf increasing the marginal debt and many other things that i and my colleagues from we will set a reasonable policy, i think that it is the same as the other factions, then let 's either close today's meeting, take a break, wait until everyone has eaten, until everyone can return and start working, in general

you did not answer , but do you know about the decision of the constitutional court, which does not allow voting of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, if there are not 226 people's deputies in the hall, and whether you are able now to ensure that there is such a number and we do not turn the meetings of the verkhovna rada into a farce, because here there is a very small number of people's deputies who stay in the hall and vote, thank you roslan, thank you dmytro oleksandrovich, i will answer you right away, i am very good at the constitution of ukraine, the regulations, these are two things that, according to the constitution, regulate the activity of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, that is why i use them to the full extent of the powers that i have, as far as my duty is concerned, for now i once again appeal to the people's deputies, who else may not be in the hall, take their place of work and accept work in the activities of the verkhovna rada. let's move on, dear colleagues, next, 100.39 lyonov, don't insist, next, next. 151st mikisha, please, aroslav oleksiyovych, i have 151, 152 and 165, i ask for two minutes and then put 165

the cabinet of ministers of ukraine approved international experts who judges of the constitutional court will be selected. they were the fifth prime minister of poland, the honorary president of the venice commission, hanna sukhotska. former. the minister of justice and internal affairs of slovenia, ales zalar, as well as maureen o'connor, an american lawyer, a retired judge, they have three deputies, at the same time, ukrainian members participate in the procedure, for example, the council of judges delegated the head of the supreme court of ukraine, during yanukovych , yaroslav romaniuk, who supported criminal dictatorial laws on january 16, president volodymyr zelenskyy delegated oksana vasylchenko, director of the educational and scientific institute of law of kyiv national university named after shevchenko, to the advisory group of experts. the verkhovna rada has yet to decide on its delegates to the advisory group of experts. at the end of last month, the united states embassy handed ukraine a list of priority reforms for the fastest possible integration into the european community

of the constitutional court is once again under threat. greetings, you are watching judicial control and i am tetyana shustrova. that year , in june, ukraineus. for membership in the european union, subject to the fulfillment of seven steps, the key of which is judicial reform and reform of the constitutional court. and if the judicial reform is slowly but surely moving forward, the reform of the constitutional court is once again under threat. the council of judges elected a person from the entourage of the odious and scandalous chairman of the liquidating oask, pavel, to the competitive commission that will appoint judges of the supreme court. vovka, as well as a henchman of the fugitive president viktor yanukovych. we will talk about these ambiguous decisions today. but first to the news. north the commercial court of appeal satisfied several complaints of the plaintiffs in the case of the bilotserkiv thermal power plant. the rights of investors and the newly appointed director of the company, ihor vegularny, were violated due to the decision of the judge of the commercial court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko. judges pakhs, demydo

the cabinet of ministers of ukraine approved the international experts who will select the judges of the constitutional court the fifth prime minister of poland, the honorary president of the venice commission, hanna sukhotska, former minister of justice and internal affairs of slovenia, aleš zalar, as well as maureen o'connor, american lawyer, retired judge, they have three deputies, at the same time, ukrainian members participate in the procedure, for example, the council of judges of the delegation .

of the constitutional court has once again found itself under threat. greetings, you are watching judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. last year , in june, ukraineeived the status of a candidate for membership in the european union, subject to the fulfillment of seven steps, the key of which is the implementation of judicial reform and the reform of the constitutional court. and if the judicial reform is slowly but surely moving forward, the reform of the court constitution has once again found itself under a threat the council of judges elected a person from the entourage of the odious and scandalous chairman of liquidated oask, pavlo vovka, as well as a henchman of the fugitive president, viktor yanukovych, to the competition commission that will appoint judges of the constitutional court. we will talk about these ambiguous decisions today, but first to the news. the northern commercial court of appeal satisfied several complaints of the plaintiffs in. bilotserkivskaya thermal power plant. the rights of investors and the newly appointed director of the enterprise, ihor vegularny, were violated due to the decision of the judge of the commercial

of the constitutional court. in 2010, as part of a panel of judges, he recognized as legitimate the constitutional coup, as a result of which ex-president viktor yanukovych usurped power in ukraine. one thing is certain - children are not responsible for their parents. however, the connection with political forces, especially pro-russian ones, in no way indicates the integrity of the judge. bryntsev acquired land in the temporarily occupied crimea. several houses and apartments and non-residential rooms. in 2019 , the public integrity council found that during the three years of the war, the judge crossed the border with russia more than 20 times. bryntsev's father and mother also made regular trips to the russian federation. this is for sure, well , the russian border guards and other representatives of the russian law enforcement agencies cannot fail to know why they let it go, how they let it go. this person, how and for what they exchanged security guarantees for, if the judge rides back and forth, or to the occupied territory, or directly to the territory of the russian federation, then clearly there is some kind of agreement between this judge, or this and the russian fede

of the constitutional court. in 2010, as part of a panel of judges, he recognized as legitimate the constitutional coup, as a result of which ex-president viktor yanukovych usurped power in ukrainething is certain - children are not responsible for their parents. however, the connection with political forces, especially with russian ones, does not indicate at all integrity of the judge. bryntsev took ownership of land in the temporarily occupied crimea, several houses and apartments, and non-residential premises. in 2019 , the public integrity council found that the judge crossed the border more than 20 times during the three years of the war. with russia. bryntsev's father and mother also made regular trips to the russian federation. the russian border guards and other representatives of the russian law enforcement agencies are certainly aware of this. uh, why do they miss, how do they miss this person, in what way and for what what did they exchange security guarantees for. if a judge goes back and forth, or to the occupied territory, or directly on the territory of the russian federation, then there is clearly some kind of agreement between these judges. or by this and the ru

convention, to the constitution of ukraine, and they will obviously defend their position if there is a draft law, or the law will be adopted in the final version in european courts, given the practice of applying european legislation and how they consider it, how likely it is that philly roc will seek the cancellation of this draft law or in some way interfere with the implementation of this draft law or law in ukraine? or they will submit lawsuits to the european court of human rights, even if the courts in ukraine will lose and the european court of human rights will annul the decisions of the ukrainian courts. this is quite possible, because this law is unfortunately not perfect. the convention on the protection of human rights, it just says that you can ban any organization when it poses a threat to national security, but it should be done by law, not by a court, because every court... one court will make such a decision, another such, and these decisions of the courts do not stand in the ecthr, they are simply overturned there, that is why i also believe that this law on today, unfortunately, it is not perfect, we have already mentioned the fifth column , w

rights of national minorities in ukraine, and the government has a separate program called united diversity, here we see that anti-corruption initiatives were also reformed constitutional court and also many other aspects. i agree with the president and with minister koleba that we definitely expect the opening of negotiations in december. most likely, all this will be finalized at the eu-ukraine summit, which usually takes place in the capital. this, this is an interesting aons. and i would also like to clarify with you about who did not come to this meeting, what did not arrive. minister of foreign affairs of hungary, this is expected for ukraine, but there was also no polish minister, what is happening between kyiv and warsaw at the moment, so thank you for the question, i will be very modest in my comments, we see that the election race is taking place, which will be finalized within the current month, it should not be considered as a certain negative or blocking, the representative of the ministry, is a representative of the conservative party, here you can rather refer not to the decline of ours, the negativity in our relations or other aspects, this is the pre-electio

of ukraine. to pay it, the chairman of the board of gzk must work for 30,000 years, which is complete nonsense, contradicts constitution and the decision of the european court of human rights. in addition, the actions surrounding gzk are also a blow to the economy of poltava oblast and the state as a whole, as well as the investment climate of ukraine. investments, jobs, infrastructure development and million-dollar additions to the budget. all this is poltava. region and ukraine risks losing, an attempt to pressure foreign investors may affect international aid to ukraine in war conditions, that an important message came from the middle east, so iran said that hamas is ready to release hostages, if israel does not strike the gas sector , the ministry of foreign affairs announced this... iran, the spokesman of the ministry of foreign affairs of iran, sir kanaan , said at a press conference in tehran, referring to the statement of representatives of hamas, you see, there is such a connection here hamas, iran, has said it is ready to take the necessary steps to release civilians held by resistance groups, but its view is that such steps require preparation, a

of ukraine in this criminal proceeding, and the prosecutor personally confirmed this , therefore, in order to ensure that the rights of the individual, which are then constituted by the european court, are not violated and that the state does not reimburse funds, we followed the law, however, the decision of the panel of judges refers to what do you mean... the ukrainian side was concerned with the extradition of shepelev to ukraine, and it did not happen, as we recall, due to the refusal of the russian side to extradite the suspect, so this is very similar to the manipulation of the savchenko law. shepelev's case turned out to be quite revealing. it well illustrates how the judicial system works in ukraine, when a person accused of serious criminal offenses can avoid punishment thanks to the mastery of the servants of themis to circumvent the norms of laws and a kind of humanism. now free in conditions of a full-scale war with russia, there may be a person responsible for alleged treason in favor of the russian federation, four contract murders, one attempted murder and embezzlement of state funds. and for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i, tatiana

of the constitutional court, but it is also necessary to review very carefully what the council of judges does, its composition and, in general, whether it is needed or not in the current judicial system of ukraine. interestingly, the council of judges did not rate candidate mykola gimon, a patriot who made pro-ukrainian decisions in donetsk in 2014. members of the council of judges gave gimon zero votes. experts foundations warn that if the ukrainian composition of the advisory group of experts consists of odious representatives with a dubious reputation, and not real agents of the media, we will have every chance to fail the judicial reform, which is unacceptable on ukraine's path to the european union. for today, i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system of ukraine, or you want to tell about dishonesty. judge, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address that you now see on your screens, let's meet in a week, to all the best, people and ideas that protect and create ukraine, the sixth forumpathy, the future of tradition. ukrainian in the global world ivano-frankivsk on october 14 and 15, discussions abou

of ukraine, and also establish other additional legal regulation of relations, which is the subject. laws, you are trying, or the government is trying to violate the numerous decisions of the constitutional court on this matter, starting from 2007 until today, with a corresponding draft law, this also applies to the law on the judicial system, the status of judges, amendment 268 for your help, for help from my side and supported by the relevant specialized committee, so that you can consider it, so that you solve this problem, so that you do not violate the constitution, please , we are waiting for the second reading, taking into account this amendment, the draft, thank you, serhii, you insist, don’t insist, thank you, let’s move on, 269 , vasyl ivanovich mokan, doesn’t insist, 270th, yatsenko, doesn’t insist, 271 arishonkov, doesn’t insist, 272 , lyashenko, does not insist, 273, tsabal does not insist, the 274th committee on the issue. the information officer does not insist, 276 yefimov does not insist, 277 trityakova does not insist, 270 oh, she is taken into account 278 zheliznyak , the railway does not insist, thank you, 279 magera does not insist, 280 mykisha, please, thank you, well, th

of the united states and the european union, which was supposed to monitor large-scale corruption in ukraine, and which regularly got into scandals, then it even had to be removed through the constitutional courtn american political publication published material that the united states is preparing two programs at once. need to help various anti-corruption programs, the same naboo, international assistance, that’s what it is, it’s purely like advertising , that we help, we are against corruption, we are for everything good, against everything bad, as they say, the second program, it’s not secret, but it’s not open because specific schemes are spelled out there, how they will achieve specific ones. the majority will not know about it, at least until a politician, with the permission of an approving nod from the white house , writes about it, that is , it just spells out how they will integrate ukraine, well, in particular, it is at least known one main direction is for ukraine to move to nato standards, transform itself and conform to this nato model, i will read a short excerpt, biden administration officials are much more concerned about corruption on... they do not admit this publicly, this

of ukraine. in order to pay it, the chairman of the board of gzk must work for 30... thousand years, which is complete nonsense, contradicts the constitution and the decision of the european courthuman rights in addition, the actions surrounding gzk are also a blow to the economy of poltava oblast and the state as a whole, as well as the investment climate of ukraine, investments, jobs, infrastructure development and million-dollar additions to the budget. poltava region and ukraine are at risk of losing all this, an attempt to put pressure on foreign investors may affect international aid to ukraine in wartime conditions. dear friends, we are back on the air, andriy saichuk and leisya vakulyuk, we work for you in this studio, and we also work for you in this studio, surprise, oleg dunda, people's deputy of ukraine, came to us today, we are glad to see you, mr. oleg. good morning, greetings to everyone. good morning, are you in lviv on business or have you come to rest? well, of course in business. recently, it happens very often in lviv, but generally it is about business , but now it was a meeting of the round tables of my committee, where the issue was considered, including

ukraine, register as a russian orthodox church in ukraine, then everything will be, well, in the end it was and the decision of the constitutional court if i'm not mistaken, several years ago, before the full-scale invasion, let's move on to another topic, mr. valery, tonight outside kiev, the american president met, addressed, i'm sorry, with speech to the american nation, in which he said that the turning point in the war between good and evil, light and darkness is coming, and in this context he mentioned two cases, the ukrainian, the russian-ukrainian war, and the attack on israel , that is, in fact, the war for the independence of israel, including the independence of ukraine, he said that the supply of weapons to ukraine will not stop until the last, what surprised you the most in this speech, maybe, maybe it gave you optimism, and maybe, on the contrary , pessimism, please no pessimism, powerful speech, americans, american presidents know how to prepare a speech, they know how to combine strategic visions with the interests of their country with the fact that they affect, well, to a certain extent, sorry, we were talking with y

their rights in court if there are accusations against you, but a certain procedure must be followed, and first of all, there are still some procedural norms, even the constitution of ukraineolated in some moments, so the legal group reports on the repeated violation of civil rights of mr. dzhevago by law enforcement agencies during the pre-trial investigation of the criminal proceedings about the alleged embezzlement of funds of the bank, finance, credit, please tell me what is the story there, what are the facts of what side. the prosecution, or the investigative bodies, do not act as they should act, according to the powers prescribed for them? well, first of all, i'm to you thank you very much for reminding me about article 17 of the criminal procedure code, it is a presumption of guilt of a person, by the way, all pre-trial investigation bodies forget and the courts forget about this article of the code during the pre-trial investigation, implementation, and before that, i i would like to point out that indeed, i completely agree, and that the rights and civil rights of our client are violated during the pre-trial investigation of this criminal proceeding, which conce

of the constitutional court is once again under threat. see in thursday, october 5 at 5:45 p.m. court program. control with tatyana shustrova on espresso tv channel. the war in ukraineainians. wins and losses, analysis and forecasts, politics and geopolitics. serhiy rudenko and the guests of his program will talk about all this. people who have information and shape public opinion. people who defend ukraine and create the future now, most importantly. interesting in the verdict program by serhiy rudenko. from monday to friday at 20:00, repeat at 12:10. so, let's continue the conversation with pyotr chernyk, a military expert, and to this is us, and mykola volokhov joined us, he is the commander of the tera air reconnaissance unit as part of the third separate assault brigade. congratulations mykola. i congratulate you. glory to ukraine. glory to heroes. let's. then let's start right away from the bakhmud direction, where mykola himself can tell us more , here we have a report that the fiercest battles are currently taking place near andriivka, why are these fierce battles taking place there, can you explain why there is so much focus on this area, this field battles

constitutional court, but it is also necessary to very... carefully review what the council of judges does, its composition and in general, whether it is necessary or not required by the current judicial system of ukraine. interestingly, the council of judges did not rate candidate mykola gimon, a patriot who made pro-ukrainian decisions in donetsk in 2014. members of the council of judges gave gimon zero votes. experts of the dera foundation warn if the ukrainian composition of the relevant group of experts will have odious representatives. with a dubious reputation, and not real agents, we will have every chance to fail the judicial reform, which is unacceptable on ukraine's path to the european union. for today , i have everything, it was judicial control and i, tetyana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in to the judicial system of ukraine, or you want to tell about an unscrupulous judge, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address, the address of which you now see on your screens, we will meet in exactly a week, everything will be fine, the nose will be treated, we will start with washing, so, maridosa is taken, she sprays herself in the nose, because she cleans everything from th

constitution in ukraine has always been adopted, many times, many times, for each change there is a constitutional court, and the constitution - this is a dark matter, because it was always accepted only in the dead ofl also listen to the armenian comrades, they will prosecute us, yes, i understand, armenian, well, stupid, i’m generally you know, what surprises me most about this story is... that a jew brings to the forefront the national question, what kind of jew is he? well, who he is, i don’t know at all, well, well, you don’t know, but we know , maybe he’s a scot, well, maybe a scottish jew, probably, yes, most likely a khakhlander then you already know, such a new version of the people who few people know yet, so here you know, it’s an interesting point, well, people naturally communicate, watch, but here i am just recently, but about the national issue of languages ​​​​and other things. was in a populated area located, well completely on the front line, he flies there all the time, yes, people in the countryside wash themselves with such a surzhik, and it’s like a typical south russian one, and he comes up to me, i love listening to them, how they get home, it’s really such warm emotions, it

is, in ukraine, how many constitutions there were. for each change according to its constitutional court, and the constitution is a dark matter, because it was always adopted only in the dead ofinka, but what a high level of education gordon has, no, well, this is a high level of expertise. the armenian, well, stupid, i actually know, what surprises me most in this story is that the jew is considering the national question, gordon, what kind of jew is he, well, who is he? i don’t know at all, well, how, well, you don’t know, but we know, maybe he’s a scot, well, maybe a scottish jew, probably, yes, most likely a hochlander then you already know, this is a new version of the people, which is still few knows, so here you know, it’s an interesting point, well, people naturally communicate, look , but just recently, about the national issue, languages ​​and other things, i was in a settlement located, well , quite on the front line, there flies in all the time, yes, people in the countryside are doing their prayers, such a surzhik yes, well, a typical south russian, and he comes up to me, i love listening to them, how they get home , it’s very warm, really, such emotions , a man