cooperation in asia? from what you can judge by russia's asian policy, including the latest meeting between letting you put in an kim jong-un, russia is trying to maintain dialogue between china and other parties. we can witness closer cooperation motivated by deteriorated relations between the russia and u.s., and also china. again, this cooperation has not really been given by these negative dynamics and has a lot of future complications for the russia and u.s. it is very important in my opinion to avoid the risk of opposite blocs that could be, where russia would be more stimulated to join china rather than maintain its current foreign-policy. looking at russia and u.s. relations now, this is probably only on the road to dreams. for the future and to explore where russia and u.s. could have some confluence of cooperation, russia and the u.s. have much -- divergence in asia than other regions like europe or the middle east. there can be probably a basis for some cooperation if the current relations are

like you're really.. >> cooper: uh-huh. yeah. >> bradford: ...punctured. >> cooper: it's a 360-degree painting that raises many questions in bradford's mind, particularly about how we look at history. it's looking at it through a different lens. >> bradford: yes. that's the feeling that i wanted you to have, that history was laying on top of it, that... that... gouging into it, erasing it, bits of it showing. it's kind of me kind of revising it in a way. >> cooper: so, is this a more accurate representation of history? >> bradford: i don't really believe history's ever fully accurate. >> cooper: it's acknowledging that? >> bradford: it's acknowledging the gaps, the things we don't know. >> cooper: so many people have come to see "pickett's charge," the hirshhorn has extended the exhibition for three more years. bradford is already working on new paintings for shows in china, london, and new york. do you worry about the vagaries of the art world? what is popular today, 20 years from now? >> bradford: oh, no, no, no, no. i wo

it's cooperating with the investigation, as are j.p. morgan, bank of america, and deutsche bank u.s.a. none of the banks accepted our requests for interviews. the case could end up with hundreds of millions of dollars in fines, and under u.s. whistle-blower laws, howard wilkinson could potentially share in the proceeds. i mean, you were the whistle- blower in this case, correct? >> wilkinson: i guess so. >> kroft: under u.s. law, you could end up being rewarded with a substantial amount of money. >> wilkinson: back in december '13, the idea that this would be a case that the u.s. department of justice and s.e.c. would ever have any interest in would never even cross my mind. you know, the bank should've investigated it, sorted it out. what happened? basically nothing. it's shocking. >> kroft: it's impossible to say exactly where the $230 billion of dirty money originated, beyond the banks of moscow. it's been estimated that about a third of the russian economy is off the books. awash in cash, much of it is from corruption, bribes, and t

he's cooperating with the law enforcement community.here's an fbi investigation into administration activity when i was at the white house and all of us cooperated, including the national security adviser, into that inquiry. michael flynn is finally doing that when faced with the prospect of not getting a plea deal he liked. plea deals don't come for free. he had to cooperate and show something to get the deal he got. as i learned during the course of the special county investigation in paul manafort's case, if you're not forthcoming with the special counsel and with the legal teams, tler repercussions and deals can be taken off the table. i will just add finally, wolf, michael flynn did not act like someone expecting a pardon from donald trump. it's clear he at least seemed to want to provide information to try to get the best deal that he could rather than wait and hope president trump would come to his rescue at some point. >> we known he has been cooperating with the special counsel. he's now awaiting sentencing as we also know. eve

recently seen new forms of cooperation. now we are finishing building the -- haveacross been in place for those who have been following it for a couple decades. probably we will finish them this year. [indiscernible] we still have problems with crossing the border, which is in that shape. -- bad shape. and oneall these issues make it- is unless we more viable and forms that would not force anti-china interactions, we do not have these relations that much stable and that much beneficial to each other as we would like them to be. sphere is the one that has been lagging behind. [indiscernible] has not emerged yet. on how to make this more efficient, on how to implement all of the -- to what has been doing on the -- and to tackle corruption here. businessmen also have somewhat changed in the last year and in terms of course regional cooperation. there have been new interests for those people have not really exited russia. a lot of chinese run back to -- it was notsia economically stable. those who have stayed -- well, see -- cu

we are cooperating in the creation of the north stream to project russia valis or 3 years support of this project which. provides the energy security of the entire european continent. and important to. part of our cooperation is bilateral contacts and into regional contacts in march this year there was the future and we held the the there was the russian regions day held in austria hundreds of representatives all 4 austrian businesses took part in this event and i would like to know the of course the valuable cultural and humanitarian ties this year we have the cross cultural year of. all of the youth of russia and also of them we have agreed to hold in 202122 the year of literature. in russian and austria. we are already starting efforts to popularize literature. of our countries in both our countries the same goes for the use of and the teaching of our language in australia and the german language in russia which we are developing times in terms of civil society and right after these talks will meet. the members of the. dialogue civil society forum we've agreed to. in vienna last y

he's about to start cooperating. and he in the dead of night gets the warning from the president's goon squad letting mike flynn know if he's thinking about cooperating you know what, mike, here's what you might want to keep in mind. i mean, this is from the mueller report. quote, in late november 2017 flynn began to cooperate with this office meaning mueller's prosecutors. quote, on november 22nd flynn withdrew from the joint defense agreement he had with the president. flynn's counsel told the president's personal counsel and counsel for the white house that flynn could no longer have confidential communications with the white house or the president. later that night the president's personal counsel left a voicemail for flynn's lawyer that said this. i understand your situation but let me see if i can't state it in starker terms. wouldn't surprise me if you've gone onto make a deal with the government. if there's information that implicates the president, then we've got a national security issue. so you know we nee

as the extent of that cooperation. with respect to manafort, there is evidence that the president's actions have the potential to influence manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government. the president and his personal counsel make repeated statements suggesting that a pardon was a possibility for manafort. while also making it clear that the president did not want manafort to flip, that's in quotes in the mueller report, and cooperate with the government. on june 15th, 2018, the day the judge presiding over manafort's d.c. case, was considering whether to revoke his bail, the president said that he, quote, felt badly, closed quote, for manafort, and stated, quote, i think a lot of it is very unfair, closed quote. and when asked about a pardon for manafort, the president said, quote, i do want to see people treated fairly. that's what it's all about, closed quote. later this day, after manafort's bail was revoked, the president called it a quote, tough sentence, closed quote. that was, quote, very unfair

to promote our economic cooperation and to look for if in fact he wastes which. would be under the power of this in an acceptable illegitimate american the restrictions. would have good. prospects. countries to project same with the band that we hail a bad day activity. intergovernmental commission or the economic operations next time it will meet next to market in iran where agreed to prepare as solid package of agreements on important is years. just now we say in the protocol which allows us to simplify the conditions of the trade pursuit of a certain categories of citizens of russia and iran first of all of. us who are now will be getting a piece in a simplified way on the basis of the direct invitation of the interested organization of course it will contribute to the development of the contacts between the people. who had a very detailed discussion on this different aspects want to national agenda including the situation in syria libya yemen in iraq in afghanistan. and everything which happens around as a state today. on all this is here so we have a joint a

is it cooperating? >> i don't know if that declares the president did nothing wrong, although the president, in terms of collusion did nothing right, is that not correct? >> correct is not a crime, it's obstructing. is that fully cooperating to say that? >> well, i don't see any conflict between that and fully cooperating with the investigation. >> the president, of course, declared many times publicly in tweets and at campaign rallies that he would testify, but he never did testify, correct? >> as far as i know. >> i think you know whether -- >> as far as i know he didn't testify. >> and mr. mueller found the written answers to be inadequate, is that correct? >> i think he wanted additional, but he never sought it. >> the president -- >> he never pushed it. >> the president never testified. does the fact that mr. mueller found the trump campaign was receptive to some of the offers of assistance from russia, or the fact that the trump campaign never reported any of this to the fbi, does that trouble you

is that cooperating? >> firstly, asking sessions to unrecuse himself, we do not think, is obstruction. >> i'm not asking you if it's obstruction. is it fully cooperating? >> i don't know if that declares the president did nothing wrong. although the president, in terms of collusion, did nothing wrong. isn't that correct? >> collusion is not a crime. it's the obstructing. is that fully cooperating, to say that? >> well, i don't see any conflict between that and fully cooperating with the investigation. >> the president, of course, declared many times publicly in tweets and at campaign rallies that he would testify. but he never did testify. is that correct? >> as far as i know. >> i think you know whether he testified or not. >> as far as i know, he didn't testify. >> and mr. mueller found the written answers to be inadequate. is that correct? >> i think he wanted additional, but he never sought it. >> and the president never testified? >> he never pushed it. >> the president never testified? does the fact

>> obviously, our egypt relationship is a pillar of our security cooperation in the region. is one of the significant contributions over the years to with theurity perspective on russia, we share concerns, around the eastern mediterranean and northern africa. with respect to, you know, the situation in libya, we continue to impress upon all of our partners in the region that the solution to the libya challenge is not a military one, that it's one that needs to be brought together with all sides with a political resolution. we recognize that qatar is likely to have a role to play in the solution but it's not one conflictwant further and that is our position with respect to all of our partners and with respect to libya. >> so russia and egypt, pretty long story. russia feels as though that it should have greater inroads in egypt than it currently does based on its past and that relationship that it had, so in that respect, egypt is the big price for russia to grab and the one that it wants to hive off from the u.s. sphere of influence. been a great example of how russia has tr

is that fully cooperating? atty. gen. barr: he fully cooperate canned. senator leahy: by instructing the former aide to tell the attorney general to unrecuse himself, shut down the investigation, and the president did nothing wrong, that's fully cooperating? atty. gen. barr: where is that in the report? senator leahy: volume two, page five. n june 19, 2017, the president had a message for lewandowski, the special -- notwithstanding his recusal from the russian investigation. the investigation period prior to the president. the president had done nothing wrong. is that cooperating? atty. gen. barr: firstly, asking sessions to unrecuse himself, we do not think is object ostrucks. senator leahy: it's object strucks. is he cooperating? atty. gen. barr: don't know that declares the president did nothing wrong although the president in terms of collusion did nothing wrong. isn't that correct? senator leahy: it's the obstructing. is that fully cooperating to say that? atty. gen. barr: well, i don't see any conflict between that and fully cooperating with the in

to electrify the farms, through rural cooperatives., to prove that human problems can be solved by reason, science and education. the tennessee valley was to be pioneering again, this time to be developed, not plundered. this time not for the benefit of the few, but for the many who lived there. these were the new pioneers. the architects, the research chemists, the agricultural experts, the power men, the designers of hydroelectric dams. their effort was to control nature not by defying her, as in the wasteful past, but by understanding her, and harnessing her in the service of humanity. ♪ narrator: in may 1933, a new chapter was written in american public policy when the plan was brought before the representatives of the people in congress. an act was passed creating the tva, the tennessee valley authority. president roosevelt told the nation the project would set an example of planning not for this generation alone, but for all the generations to come. then, things began to happen in the valley. ♪ narrator: for many of the valley pe

they know he is cooperating. they know robert mueller is investigating. they know that the president is being investigated for obstruction of justice, and they can't stop themselves from reaching out and i think it was they were so concerned about what flynn was saying. and trying to influence flynn. we know from the mueller report -- excuse me, when flynn's lawyer says we can't talk to you anymore basically, we're not part of this joint defense agreement. we know that the president's lawyer comes back and says the president will see that as a hostile action that you're taking. >> elliot, is this anything more than just interesting detail, some of which may have been redacted? again, this was all information that mueller had to consider when he was making determinations he was making? >> it's interesting detail, but it's interesting detail that sort of shows the level of poor judgment exercise, both with respect to the willingness to play footsie with russia but also with respect to obstruction of justice. what i also think this particularly shows is now

and to get angry at a witness for cooperating is trying to dissuade them from cooperating. that is an obstructive act in my mind. now, it's very interesting as you pointed out. i mean you immediately think why is this not yet another obstructive act that trump should be responsible for. let's put the lawyer's awful conduct aside for a second. it seems that mueller wasn't able to get to the bottom of was this is something that was directed by trump, did he have discussions with trump about doing this when he communicated it to flynn's counsel. i think that we can all assume that it was something that trump understood was happening even if it wasn't explicit but he wasn't able to get the facts that you see mueller have elsewhere so detailed in the report. >> walter dellinger, this conversation, the voice mail and the conversation from john dowd from the president's personal lawyer strike me as a disbarable material for an attorney. it appears to be the special counsel reported it in the context of the obstruction of justice mosaic that he assembled involving the president and

and the completeness of that cooperation, end quote. and my question to you, when i read this, members of congress? >> right. well we don't know. these could be people who were allies of the president. i think the big question here, and i think elie touches on it, is what did the president know about all of this. >> that is what we don't know. >> that is right. and as mueller -- mueller pointed out in his report, he said these sequence of events could have had the potential to influence flynn's decision about cooperating and the extent of the cooperation but because of privilege issues they didn't pursue it or couldn't pursue it. so these are questions now that we don't know the answer to. and i'm not a lawyer. elie is, i don't think you are, brooke. in a phone call in which you had a joint defense agreement, wouldn't it just be simple to ask the question are you now cooperating with mueller? thanks very much, please call me back. end of voice mail. won't that have been the way to do it. >> to the j.d. >> i'll give you a common sense an

ifs that fully cooperating? >> he fully cooperating. so by instructing a former aide to tell a former attorney general to unrecuse himself and shut down the investigation that's cooperating? >> where is that in the report? >> the president dictated a message to lewandowski to tell sessions he should announce he did not recuse himself from the russia investigation. it appears to president did nothing wrong. is that cooperate something. >> firstly, asking sessions to enrecuse himself we do not think the obstruction. >> i'm not asking you what's obstruction. i'm asking you if he's cooperating. >> i don't know if that declares the president did nothing wrong, although the president in terms of collusion did nothing wrong. isn't that correct? >> collusion is not aobstructin. but is that fully cooperating? >> well, i don't see any conflict with that and fully cooperating with the investigation. >> the president of course declared many times publicly in tweets and at campaign rallies and that he would testify but he never did testify, is that

chart of shanghai cooperation organization is made quite clear that this kind of cooperation is not a directed against any party is china russia doing joy very good relationship with fishley was described as a comprehensive a strategic partnership of condemnation and as well reflected in either the exercises with shanghai cooperation organization or even by natural exercises over years we have a saying the exercise is expanding i think in terms of subjects or in terms of scope with faraday the un they made it to reigning in the body to see if the south china sea and the sea of japan which really reflect the good relationship between the two countries so one of the latest pentagon reports refers to china's military forces as the quote china's military threat does beijing perceive this report as a provocation what is the united states trying to achieve here. well that is a good question sophie because we are wondering why the u.s. would to take china as a first or revisit a country and then as a primary competitor if you look at the china policy we would conclude the launch claims that

s credibilitycohen' once he began cooperating. volume 2. >> congressman alan lowenthal.he president launched public attacks on the investigation and individuals involved in it who could possess evidence adverse to the president. the presidentte engaged in a series of targeted efforts to control the investigation. presidentce, the attempted to remove the special counsel, he sought to have attorney general sessions under -- limit thelf investigation and sought to prevent public disclosure of information about the june 9, 2016 meeting between russians and campaign officials. and he used public forums to attack potential witnesses who may offer adverse information and to praise witnesses who declined to cooperate with the government. all you do -- volume 2, page 157. >> congresswoman barbara lee. >> in early 2018, the press reported that the president had directed mcgahn to have a special counsel removed in june had017 and that mcgahn threatened to resign rather than carry out the order. the president reacted to the news stories by directing white house officials to tell mcg

without the fullest cooperation of the people on the land, they are worthless.re were small meetings up and down the valley. john warden told the farmers, ten inches of top soil supports all the life on earth. every drop of rain that falls on your fields carries a way -- away a bit of this soil. every time it rains, the gullies, the scars on your fields grow deeper and wider. every year the precious top soil goes faster. the undersoil is hard and sterile. the water, which should have soaked into your land, runs off uselessly, your top soil travels with it, uselessly, down to the delta of the river. millions of tons of good farming soil lost forever, blowing away with the wind. all of this waste isn't necessary. it can be stopped. your land can be saved if we work together. you've seen the dams, but they are only part of the plan. the rest of it is up to you. if we're to succeed, all of us, you must learn to stop the erosion of your own land. the t.v.a. was created for you. to teach you new methods, to provide you with fertilizers to restore your soil. the dam is

including us and therefore they should not be cooperated with an extension of their terrorists because they are self declared terrorist organization i mean when all i actually is using i know i know but we and we know all of that we know that if the history behind but you know that none of that really matters if america wants to back someone i mean none of that explanation really matter so the facts are at their core cooperating with them. that you are fighting well then we will also do whatever it takes to protect our borders that's why we're working with all of the partners in the region including russia and iran and we go into these our stomach talks embodying our american and nato colleagues as well to find solutions but we will not accept any terrorist elements to be at the borders of turkey thus why we are determined to establish safety zones in her neighborhood in turkey's borders and we want the territorial integrity of syria to remain intact we are very much against division of syria we are very much against creation of new failed states in the middle east and we will do our b

i myself have called for hemispheric collaboration and cooperation. this is a shared responsibility. with that in mind, and because i appreciated that comment you made, can you speak to the efforts.com is engaged in and i triangle region to address the root causes of the emigration flows and do you think that you can positively impact the humanitarian challenge that we are facing? >> we are working with our partners in honduras and el salvador. part of the region to work on the professional forces they have legitimacy with people and we have a human rights program that is now in its 20th year. we talk about human rights at every venue and hold training some of them are receptive but it's a long process and there is a street to everything. we also have the backbone of the forces or enlisted its something they have to work on it from a longer view they deal with the heart and sharing tactics they are interoperable on the enforcement missions it is a place where we teach the classes in spanish and an adjunct with the national defense university and we br

really unprecedented cooperation. -- listen, chris, when it mattered. >> he didn't testify. read the report. mueller said we had a lot of other evidence to work with but we needed that. >> because you're a very smart lawyer, chris, and you would never in a million years let your client testify if he didn't need to. >> i have a different analysis. and i'll offer when you are done. >> chris -- >> no, finish your point, dave. >> go ahead. >> my analysis is this. i agree with you 100%, the raskins, sekulow, guiliani, and, amy, he's the president of the united states and he said he wanted to go there under oath and he said he owed that as being president and he had nothing to hide. he owes the people of this country a debt of service. he served them. and he should have sat down if he had nothing to hide and answered the man's questions. even the written questions, amy. her turn. even the written questions didn't handle obstruction. how is that transparent? >> chris, so you would advise the president of the united states to

. >>> new this week end, we've learned at the same time michael flynn was cooperating with robert muellerc of mueller, matt gates. here are the twitter messages obtained by cnn that flynn sent. your leadership is vital or our country now. keep the pressure on. before he got that message, gates was on fox news, criticizing mueller and the department of justice. flynn also sent gates a message as recently as february of this year, on the same day william barr was confirmed as attorney general. flynn sent gates a picture of a bald eagle and a flag. i want to bring in attorney and cnn legal analyst areva. gates called for mueller to resign. the fact flynn was messaging him, telling him to keep it up, does it make you wonder how willing flynn was to cooperate and whether he told mueller everything he knew? >> i think it is very troubling, ana. if you recall, back in december of last year, when michael flynn appeared before a federal judge, a federal judge questioned whether flynn was sufficiently loyal, i would say, to, you know, the prosecutors with respect to the information he provided, and

and the completion of the -- the completeness, rather, of that cooperation. is that obstruction? and if so, why was no one charged? >> it certainly sounds like obstruction, kate. and rule number two in criminal defense, when you are speaking to the lawyer of a possible cooperator, you should avoid making intimidating statements. that's what this sounds like. i don't see why it wouldn't have been investigated. some of the things i have seen with regard to privilege making it difficult don't really seem to answer the question. there would have been no privilege in the conversation between the attorney for president trump and the attorney for flynn. so it's somewhat of a mystery to me. >> interesting. greg, what shan is getting to, let me read what we know of the voice mail that went from, between trump's personal attorney and flynn's attorney, and this is what we have not seen before. this is what we have got. this is a voice mail. it wouldn't surprise me if you have gone on to make a deal with the government. if there's information that implicated the presiden

manafort was lying to mueller when he was cooperating. i think it also casts a little bit of light on why trump was so comfortable with them and not with somebody like michael cohen. >> this message is also potentially part of an either subconscious or obvious campaign for a pardon because aligning himself with gates who is a very strong trump supporter, a harsh critic of mueller, as of course is trump, a lot of what defense lawyers have done, whether it's manafort's lawyers, flynn's lawyers has been to try to ingraciate themselves with the president so that regardless of what mueller says, we a pardon could solve all problems. >> we talked to james baker who said, look, if you listen to the actual words he says, he's sort of looking at things from president trump's perspective. he's not saying necessarily that it is a witch hunt. he's saying, you know, if i was wrongly accused i would be understandable to call something a witch hunt. >> he shouldn't be using those words at all. they're simply unprofessional for someone who is the attorne

corvettes, the black sea naval cooperation task group and 56 frigate floelta. you a broad education he has indiana attend the surface wherefore officers school here in the united states. courses in canada and the netherlands, nato school in german, the joint services command in general staff college in the uk and the royal london college. viets mursu was appointed chief the roam yan naval staff in december 2013. vice admiral mersu, well, sir. >> and our third panelist, rear admiral david proctor chief of navy new zealand. rear dmirld proctor assumed the reel of chief of navy on 29 november 2018 following numerous senior positions within the kneesland defense force including deputy commander joint forces new zealand and acting vice chief of defense force. in addition he is he has held a number of logistics positions within the new zealand navy. he molds graduate degrees in management and politics and policy and at graduate of the fellow certain for strategic sta in cam ber australia. rear admiral proctor, welcome, sir. [ applause ] . and with that i'm going to g

and i ask you as instruction is that poly cooperated if he fully cooperated so by instructor and former aide to tell the truth he general under. investigation and you clear the president did nothing wrong that's fully cooperate in the report that is on. him to page five on june nineteenth twenty seventeen the president picked this message. or house could have a session of the best and said this session it's a public announcement the number saved in the rest investigation investigation very unfair to the president president done nothing wrong right ok so far pretty well firstly asking sessions to on recuse himself i do not think is a national election where the president did nothing wrong i'm not asked to answer obstruction or he well i don't know if that declares the president did nothing wrong although the president in terms of collusion did nothing wrong isn't that correct. closures on crime it's. obstructing but is that only cooperate to say that well. i don't see any conflict between that and fully cooperating with the investigation the. president of course cleared many times public

with russia is not a threat to europe turkey's cooperation with russia which would provide rushing gas to europe is an advantage is a promise to europe to find solutions when russia and ukraine had their differences and european countries could not access russian gas because of the problems or through ukraine they were the ones who felt the need for other alternative ways and means of reaching that gas and turkey through the turkish stream by pliant will be able to provide an alternative way of providing energy resources to do you being countries which require if you look at the map 70 percent at least 70 percent of all the natural resources that europe needs are either to the south or north or east of turkey so almost someone invents a new wireless technology to test the energy resources europe needs turkey is cooperation to access those energy resources so it is time for europe to realize that their cooperation with turkey is in their benefit. and that they're also calls in congress to block the purchase of f. $35.00 jets for turkey if it proceeds with purchasing russia as $400.00 mi

is it fully cooperating?> i don't know if that declares the president did nothing wrong although the president in terms of collusion did nothing wrong. isn't that correct? >> collusion is not a crime. it's the obstructing. is that fully cooperating to say that? >> well, i don't see any conflict between that and fully cooperating with the investigati investigation. >> the ppt declared many times at tweets and campaign rallies and all that he would testify. he never did testify, correct? >> as far as i know. >> i think you know whether he testified or not. >> as far as i know he didn't testify. >> mr. mueller found the written answers to be inadequate. is that correct? >> i think he wanted additional, but he never sought it. >> and the president never testified -- >> he never pushed it. >> the president never testified. >> does the fact that mr. mueller found the trump campaign was receptive, some of the offers of assistance from russia or the fact that the trump campaign never reported any of this to the fbi,

really is your client cooperating? i am not going to send some veiled message like that because it reeks of intimidation. it's appalling that anyone would do that. >> connected with all the other times the president very publicly appeared to intimidate witnesses, plus the private conversations with he saw with james comey, et cetera. evan, let me ask you a question because barr is saying not only that he's going to investigate the investigators but in the early stages of this there are already things that have raised concerns for him. we had the fbi director testifying under oath just last week saying he has seen no evidence of spying. explain the disconnect here. >> you know, that's a great question because there's clearly two different ways that these two people are seeing it, both the fbi director and -- christopher wray and also the attorney general. here is what i think is happening, certainly the fbi director is speaking to his audience, his people who don't think that they did anything wrong. certainly nothing h

trump directed the intelligence community to quickly and fully cooperate with the attorney general's investigation into surveillance activities during the 2016 presidential election. the attorney general has also been delegated full and complete authority to declassify information pertaining to this investigation, in accordance with the long-established standards for handling classified information. today's action will help ensure that all americans learn the truth about the events that occurred and the actions that were taken during the last presidential election and will restore confidence in our public institutions. again, that statement tonight from the white house. the white house then released this memorandum which is titled memorandum on agency cooperation with the attorney general's review of intelligence activities related to the 2016 presidential campaigns. campaigns, plural. the memo outlines the attorney general's authority to declassify information and intelligence, was sent to the departments of state, treasury, defense, energy, homeland

use 7 series as study in luxury and putting the sporty cooper entity go through its paces. the spanish island majorca is ideal for holidays in the sun and for testing the take out and all kinds of road conditions. these contests are close needs food says compact s.u.v.s like the v.w. t. iraq are popular but says they're too tame for buyers who prefer even sporty or handling so cooper see at smolder sports division has rolled out something special the a take up now klaus is going to try it out. is organized a little triathlon for this crossover s.u.v. sport to play off road country road and race track where the former race driver will push me to take it to its limits. the 1st test rugged terrain here in the s.u.v. is nimble enough all wheel drive and the high clearance do the trick but equipped with on road tires and can't show what it can really do. even with its higher center of gravity mia take it aces side to listen inclines of course it wasn't built to be an all terrain vehicle but for a crossover issue its performance is more than up to snuff. and the design reflects p

the idea they should cooperate with each other, i have no problem with.iam barr the power to declassify all of the material within the intelligence community is unprecedented. ordinarily each intelligence agency controls its own information because they are best able to assess whether it would compromise a source or method to disclose particular information with the director of national intelligence over all of it. instead president trump has given all of that power to william barr. when i was practicing and handling cases there were times when i wanted to bring a case but i was predeveloped from doing so because someone in the intelligence community made a decision that it would irreparably harm some source or method and that equity was worth more than my little case. i accepted that they were acting in good faith when they made that decision. if william barr who i think now has given at least the appearance that he is acting in the best interests of president trump as opposed to the best interests of our national security has that power, i worry that it

so to say the white house fully cooperated is generous. whether or not he was restricted and what he could conclude because of the outstanding office of legal council opinion on the liability of a sitting president. you dismissed that. how do you explain on the first page of volume two, you said there was a lot to do with it. he could not reach a conclusion on obstruction of justice. >> it was a reason, one of the backdrop factors that he cited as influencing his prudential judgement that he should not reach a decision which is different than citing the olc saying that but for the olc opinion, i would indict. >> i'm going to stand by what he has written. the last point they want to make as well as is about don mcgahn. if you read this section here on his experience, the president wanted him to date public they he was not asked to fire him. and if you are suggesting this was a dance with rod rosenstein, i think the president made it clear. he told lester holt that the reason to get rid of comey is the russian investigation. over and over ag