their costs for labor and product increases significantly they are only able to adjust their cost of their goods slightly for fear of losing customers. in some cases our tenants have had significant fears they will not be able to survive and will have to shut down, not only would that be tragic for these businesses to close but the impact to us landlords would also be significant. we are looking at a apartment development and adding market rate apartments in lincoln. our towns have a housing shortage and with the current market and construction costs as well as rising interest rates we have looked at this and i've had to put it on the back burner. even though there was huge demand for housing the cost associated with the rate of return is not effective. at the end of the day we hope we can improve and we have to have hope for where things will change but we continue to look for ways to overcome challenges we face and keep moving forward however we need to see policies put in place that will reduce these challenges not restrictions that will add cost and frustration to how we operate

the what is the cost of a human life? somewhat say priceless, but for many others it's the cost of medication and access to life saving drugs and therapy. unfortunately, global inequality, basic as central drugs just out of reach for people in many parts of the world. but the drug industry says it's all just to cover its own car. i'm 50 i, and you're watching the cost of everything. where today we're going to be taking a closer look at the cost of medication. the. ready one study estimated that the average cost of bringing a new drug to market fell between $1.00 to $2800000000.00. this cost is due to the higher initial cost to develop market and sell a brand new drug. and these estimates also take into account spending on fail trials of other drug candidates that didn't reach approval. the scientific challenges and drug discovery are another reason why drugs are so expensive. the are in the phase of drug creating a drug can range between $900000000.00 to $2000000000.00 and pharma companies spend about 25 percent of their

this cost is due to the higher initial cost to develop market and sell a brand new drug. and these estimates also take into account spending on fail trials of other drug candidates that didn't reach approval. the scientific challenges in drug discovery are another reason why drugs are so expensive. the are in the phase of drug creating a drug can range between $900000000.00 to $2000000000.00 and pharma companies spend about 25 percent of their revenues on r n d. afterwards, drugs undergo clinical trials that allow for the approval of new drugs. these trials can take months even years and they include testing for advocacy, dosage and side effects. the trials have a meeting cost of $900000000.00 with an approval rate for drugs entering clinical development of less than 12 percent. then finally, there's the cost of marketing. this new drug pharma companies spend around $30000000000.00 on medical marketing each year. and now there's a cost of manufacturing where the costs per treatment can range from a couple cents to a couple dollars. cost a manufacturing is typically very l

when you move something, it costs a lot. it will reflect in the cost. situation with people not liking what is going on or moving to other states, it is driving housing out. we have immigrants that need a place to stay. that is driving housing out. the plan is falling apart. it started out a good idea, but it is falling apart. host: north carolina, that listing of states ranks north carolina at the 24th least expensive, saying despite the low cost of living, north carolina has some of the top health care facilities in the country, extensive education system and easy transportation, including for international airports. diverse technology, finance and aerospace job market. lowest corporate income tax rate. that helped keep prices low and the state more affordable. your experiences may differ when it comes to cost-of-living and how that has changed. we are inviting you to let us know. (202) 748-8000 eastern and central, (202) 748-8001 and pacific. the ranking shows tennessee is the 10th least expensive state to live, according to the data that was found.

for the hospital cost priceos ad profit. colorado likes to be in the top but not on highest cost. our work to save people money on healthcare is more urgent than ever before we must leave no stone unturned. we turn when you're 50 years old i want colorado to be a state everyone can get the care they need easily and affordably. [applause] [applause] first we have to continue saving people money on prescriptions. prescription drug costs take up too much of someone's personal monthly expenses with costs rising faster than inflation. in 2021 about 10% were unable to fill prescriptions because of cost leading to bad health outcomes but also higher cost as it often led to the need for urgent care. with us today a type one diabetic. thanks to our work to cap insulin because the first legislation of its kind in the country she no longer has to choose between buying groceries in thein insulin that she needso stay healthy. she described that bill is saving her life. we're so grateful to have her here please join me in welcoming carissa. [applause] carissa is far because of that legislation

cost. a manufacturing is typically very low once the formula has been dialed in so volley by gilliard. this new hepatitis c drug received a lot of criticism when i hit the market since the cost of manufacturing was only a $150.00. but gillian charged $84000.00. but as you can see, the cost manufacturing is not the whole story. it didn't take into account the years and millions spent on r n d. so the matter is very complex. on the one hand, expansion, drugs are unaffordable for most people throughout the globe. on the other hand, pharmaceutical companies, they can't develop break through drugs, allow poor millions into developing them from their perspective. it's only fair to charge a price that will allow them to recoup their outlay and help them to continue researching and developing better drugs. and for more, let's bring in the ne chris then national field organizer center for popular democracy. so christian, and while pharma companies need to recover their r and d costs, many life savin

yet we do not count the costs of what the debt servicing will cost in anything we do. now that's -- in short order expected to eclipse our military spending which is our number one constitutional priority for our federal spending. so whatever we want to do up here if we do not begin to count the real cos of what we're doing, we will be off. and right now we are having to deal with a debt ceiling issue because the previous congress decided to spend without considering the cost of what it was going to take and to push this toward the limit. so we are cognizant of the fact that we are spending, we're going to monitor our spending in a way that we leave a better country for our kids and grandkids and this is part of making sure that we are actually counting the real costs of what we're doing as we take each step. and i would like to yield an amendment -- yield a minute to the distinguished chair of the oversight committee, my good friend, mr. comer of kentucky. the chair: the gentleman is recognized. mr. comer: i rise in support of the amendment. often when inflation is co

and once we finally have the plan's up, you then have operational costs, which include fuel costs, run the gamut from uranium mining to fuel fabrication, then have maintenance and waste disposable costs. fuel costs accounts for 28 percent of the operating expenses as uranium as procured at around a $130.00 per kilogram. disposal of the radioactive waste includes the cost of storing, transporting, and disposing of the waste in a permanent location. this costs around $2000.00 per meters cubed for a low level waste and up to $200000.00 for meters cubed for high level waste. one reactor produces roughly 48 meters cubed of low level waste and 12 meters cubed of high level waste annually. but while the cost of nuclear is high, it doesn't have to be russia and china have increased their nuclear output in recent years, and the trend is now moving towards more standardized designs. standardization reduces design and construction uncertainties, as well as a time to build reactors. thus reducing capital costs, the u. s. on the other hand, has plants out very significantly in design. and when we c

there are economic costs and there are human costs.sinesses on the coastline of england alone are at risk of rising sea levels by 2050. and this is already happening. but that's, that's the human cost, but we will also see a cost to our economy, it's been estimates of around 7% of our gdp by the end of the century through climate impacts. you say it's worth the cost, worth investing in net zero but the truth is, what is the point if other countries around the world, much bigger emitters than britain, britain's just 1% of global emissions, other countries aren't making the effort? what is the point of britain making the investment? last year alone, china built more offshore wind capacity in one year in 2021 than the uk as a whole over a decade. we are in a position where we can actually get ahead, develop the technologies, develop the net zero dividend, not only for our citizens, but that we can then export across the world. it's a win—win. but what people like nigel farage say is, look, there's no democratic mandate. the public haven't

when you move something, it costs a lot. it will reflect in the cost.he situation with people not liking what is going on or moving to other states, it is driving housing out. we have immigrants that need a place to stay. that is driving housing out. the plan is falling apart. it started out a good idea, but it is falling apart. host: north carolina, that listing of states ranks north carolina at the 24th least expensive, saying despite the low cost of living, north carolina has some of the top health care facilities in the country, extensive education system and easy transportation, including for international airports. diverse technology, finance and aerospace job market. lowest corporate income tax rate. that helped keep prices low and the state more affordable. your experiences may differ when it comes to cost-of-living and how that has changed. we are inviting you to let us know. (202) 748-8000 eastern and central, (202) 748-8001 and pacific. the ranking shows tennessee is the 10th least expensive state to live, according to the data that was found

it cuts the cost. and by the way, on the topic of medicare, the distinguished senator -- senator rick scott from florida, who was responsible for getting republicans elected to the senate, is a little bit in hot water right now. because his plan is to sunset medicare and social security. meaning if you don't reauthorize every five years, sunset. it will go away. as i said in the state of the union, if anyone tries to get rid of social security or medicare, i will veto it. [cheers and applause] that is the republican dream, i am their nightmare. look, folks. you saw i sent on the floor, i said no, no, liar, liar. i said, that means you are not going to cut medicare or social security? it is all on film, let's see who votes to cut it. look. here is rick scott's response. he said that because i am cutting prescription drug costs, that means i'm cutting medicare. i think he is a little confused. we are saving medicare hundreds of billions of dollars over time. we are strengthening medicare because you shou

at no cost to the city?eement that we fund the operations. >> who owns the cabins now? >> home first, a non-profit organization who is a partner with dignity moves. >> got it. i have a few more questions but i know supervisor mandelman has been waiting patiently. i apologize. >> before we go to supervisor mandelman, i know we have the bla report and then we'll come back. >> did you already do that? >> yeah. >> i have so many questions you forgot about the report. >> that was a positive recommendation. >> let's go to vice-chair mandelman. >> thank you, chair chan. i'm not going to have you stand too long because we are going to have you back for the place for all community as a whole and getting to a lot of questions then. i am curious, somewhat along the lines of what supervisor safai was going down there. well first actually before i go down any lines, i do want to thank dignity moves, and i want to thank tipping point and hsh and urban alchemy for trying this model out because two or three years ago there

that cut costs dramatically.ou weren't finding people showing up in the emergency room with a common illness. for some reason that regulation when away. now the medicaid population doesn't have primary care providers. that was built to reduce the cost. the medicaid recipient had to get a referral from their primary care. in other words, the doctor had to wake up at 2:00 in the morning and say you need to go to the emergency room or your 12 year old child has a cold i will see them in the morning. with medicare, there has been a lot of concentration, all of the talk has been on reducing costs and it has been on the beneficiary side. what about cutting the cost, the amount paid to providers in medicare? there is such abuse, especially with specialists. they get enormous reimbursements. what you have is a bunch of physicians, why go to primary care when i go to a specialist. host: you put several things on the plate up for discussion. brian, do you want to take some of those? guest: medicaid and nursing homes. i agr

the energy crisis, i inflation, the cost of living. what about the cost of not zero?s nice electric car. this is an energy climate analyst. they are in a cost of living crisis. is this the time to be pouring money into net zero? , :, , net zero? they are inherently volatile markets. _ net zero? they are inherently volatile markets. they i net zero? they are inherently volatile markets. they cost i net zero? they are inherently volatile markets. they cost a | volatile markets. they cost a fortune and have driven up household bills by almost double already. that simply unacceptable. fossilfuels simply unacceptable. fossil fuels are simply unacceptable. fossilfuels are driving the cost of living crisis and they are working against our national interest. 50. crisis and they are working against our national interest.— our national interest. so, sepi, what would _ our national interest. so, sepi, what would we _ our national interest. so, sepi, what would we see _ our national interest. so, sepi, what would we see if _ our national interest. so, sepi, what would we see if w

that is not because the cost of it. i think the cost will be higher than people were told it would be. it is because we cannot afford people being left out. there will have to be rules and restrictions like working for 12 months, working a certain number of hours, work king -- working for a certain number of employers. those people are left out and at the same time you are crowding out the employer provided leads. we have seen in states that have mandates with government programs, employers do not pick up their own programs because they are paying into the government one so they feel like they do not need that. in d.c., it is not an easy process. evidence has shown especially for lower income americans, it is like the door is closed because it is bureaucratic. you have to submit paperwork. you have to say how many days in advance you will be off and you cannot change that in advance -- you cannot change that without a difficult process. you cannot take half a day off for a doctors appointment. it is a lot more cumbersom

first it the cost of financing. so, in many cases investors, particularly institutional invests in the housing space have access to lots of capital, cheap capital, and they're able to use that to buy properties and win those properties when they're competing with other potential buyers. so, a co-op, and i know that's the circumstances here, but thinking more broadly, co-op if they were able to get access to capital more readily and affordably that might give nem a better chance of holding on and winning out in that competition. and i mention, you know, we've got fannie mae, freddie mac, others of the federal home loan banks and other government institutions at that can be involved in this to help make that come to reality. second, and this is not specifically to the co-op, but to single family housing, you know, one of the problems is when single family housing goes into default and foreclosure, then large invests, again, because they have cheap active to capital can come in and buy the properties and take ownership

of prescription drugs lower health care costs, lower , clean energy costs. you have a president that has been tireless about working on those issues that connect most directly to the lived experience of people across the country. the efforts which i won't -- you know, we talked about at this podium around trying to help bring gas prices down in the wake of putin's invasion. from things very visible in public like the historic release from the strategic petroleum reserve, two things the president is doing everyday behind-the-scenes diplomatically with our partners and allies on this issues. as a result in no small part because of those efforts we are now seeing progress. that progress is not sufficient. we need to keep making more progress. but the president is actually focused today on those -- those issues. and that's what you're going to hear how much can we keep making progress to reduce lower costs for people? i would say this, i think also is an area of contrast that the president will highlight. which is that he wants this economic conversation to focu

the costs are improving. they have a big leverage to growth they have the costs go down as they grow. the fixed costs are high and leveraged d r&d. the underlining growth is the market at best a small variation. tesla can absorb more pricing cut because of the profitability. there is something about the way they get the growth to help the cost base as well as fixed cost base leverage. >> what you saw and heard from ford and tesla, are you changing rating on stocks >> we do like tesla. we have been taken back over what happened in the course of 2022 a lot of issues that we knew about whether it was governance or weakness in the markets from the base, the products are strong ford and gm has costs there. they are improving, but they are facing pricing pressure in a bigger way over time, tesla's impact is immediate and ford and gm will take several quarters. >> philippe, thank you >>> coming up, swift level meltdown in the making and gm's deal with netflix the top enngtrdi stories when "wex" returns. you don't wa

so what are some of these costs and who is alternately responsible for bearing these costs? very, very strange here because there's a lot it for probably falling to the elections last year's last elections. we historically had reached candidates always in advantage in the elections. and now it's, if we reduce, you can see in the streets. you can see that for example, people, people, candidates, ah, we're good opportunities in his elections because of the quality that public funding brings to the selection. this is the answer. well he and my friend bobby, as any, thank you so much for coming on today from sao paulo, brazil, and after the break razzles poor, i thing topics such as abortion rights, taxes, religion, and gun ownership has been quantified the cost of the new gun laws and brazil can be counted in dollars. we have another great panel and guess when we come back with november 22nd 2022 outraged orthodox christians confronted ukrainian security service officers looking entrances and exits to keep the oldest monastery. they were looking for russian spies among the monk

so what are some of these cost and who is alternately responsible for bearing these costs? very, very straight here because there's a lot it for probably coming to the elections. last year's last the last year we, he served when he had reached candidates always in advantage in the elections and now it's introduce you can see it in the streets. you can see for example, people, people, candidates ah, was good opportunities in his elections because of the quality that public funding brings to the selection. this is the answer. well he and my friend bobby, as any thank you so much for coming on today from sao paulo, brazil, and after the break, brazil polarizing topics such as abortion rights, taxes, religion, and gun ownership has been quantified the cost of the new gun laws and brazil. it can be counted in dollars. we have another great panel, i guess when we come back with none of what is before, by the united states all by you when he's actually fighting a war, essentially to prove in the it on the surgeon. so for rushing forward once again in, in this region and saw that,

second, you have cost efficiency. like most things and the government contractors are selected via bits. right now, space suits are being built by 27 different companies that successfully lobbied the government for peace of the action. in contrast, you long must a suits are created by one single contractor. in $118.00 space missions, nasa saw an average cost overrun of 90 percent. in contrast, over 16 missions space x only on average cost overrun of 1 point one percent. and finally, you have speed nasa project average about 7 years versus space x project, which average about 4 years space. x has one boss who executes decisions quickly, a sharp contrast to how the chain of command with a nasa bureaucracy work. now to further break it down, let's bring in hums hamid co chair of the space generation advisory council. so 1st off, why is the space race such a big deal? seems like it's a big attraction for millionaires to compete over as a race to develop these rockets. but what's the end goal? and is it really something th

so what are some of these costs and who is ultimately responsible from bearing these costs? very, very straight here because there's a lot it for probably coming to the elections. the last year's last elections, we historically had reached candidates always in advantage in the elections. and now it's if you reduce, you can see it in the streets. you can see that for example, people, people, candidates ah, was good opportunities in his elections because of the quality that public funding brings to the selection. this is the as well. yeah. and my friend bobby has any thank you so much for coming on today from sao paulo, brazil, and after the break, brazil polarizing topics such as abortion rights tax as religion and gun ownership has been quantified. the cost of the new gun laws and brazil can be counted in dollars. we have another great panel and guess when we come back with at this hour, american and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm iraq, to free its people. and to defend the world from great danger. with food and medicines and suppli

so what are some of these costs and who is ultimately responsible for bearing these costs? very, very straight here, because there's a lot it for problem solving to the elections. last year's, last lashes. we historically had reached candidates always in advantage the elections and now it's if you reduce, you can see in the streets. you can see that for example, people, people, candidates, ah, was good opportunities in his elections because of the quality that public funding brings to the selection. this is the answer. well he and my friend bobby, as any thank you so much for coming on today from sao paulo, brazil, and after the break brazil's polarizing topics such as abortion rights, taxes, religion and gun ownership have been quantified the cost of the new gun laws and brazil can be counted in dollars, we have another great panel, a guest. when we come back with, ah, ah, is your media reflection of reality? in the world transformed what will make you feel safe? isolation, whole community? are you going the right way or are you being with what is true? what is great? in t

so again we have a no-cost score and yet this cost $250 billion.i guess the question is who identified the thrifty food plan evaluation as a way to increase the snap benefit levels? >> editor that is not how the sequence occurred but we went about undertaking the evaluation. >> i'm sorry the secretary and i worked with the gentleman providing direction. we set forth and i believe we accomplished a sound evidence-based or process tore update the thrifty relative to those four criteria. when the team set about doing it they found they could not updated without incurring a cost in terms of reflecting current price data the food consumption andw nutrients. >> net section you mentioned before criteria cost is not part of this. >> i'm sorry? >> cost is not part of this pre-quickset istapr correct. so again you have a score of zero. congressional intent zero. usda help regarding what was going on, zero. and yet you increased $2,050,000,000,000 without any congressional interactionhe whatsoever. in response to the fighting and gao on the tsp reevaluation c

you know, housing costs costs food costs , fuel, crop costs food costs, fuel, crop fuel costs .you know, our fuel costs. you know, our members, they pay has already lost value by 25% since 2009. so we need the employers to really value the workers in the education sector and give them decent pay rise as well as addressing those other issues that i've mentioned the casuals short contracts that give our members no job security the pay inequality and should say this to disputes here we are also in dispute over pensions and cuts to the pension scheme . last year to the pension scheme. last year the employers forced through cuts to the pension , which means cuts to the pension, which means that people are losing 35% of their guaranteed pension . and their guaranteed pension. and this is when the pension scheme, we know is in surplus. so this is when the pension scheme, we know is in surplus . so there we know is in surplus. so there was absolutely no need for those cuts to go through. so you know, people are suffering pay cuts now and pension when they retire. we really need to do be

of people's prescription drugs, lower health care costs, lower clean energy costs. you have a president that has been tireless about working on those issues that connect most directly to the lived experience of people across the country. the efforts which i won't -- you know, we talked about at this podium around trying to help bring gas prices down in the wake of putin's invasion. from things very visible in public like the historic release from the strategic petroleum reserve, thins the president is doing every day behind the scenes diplomatically with our partners on those issues. as a result in no small part because of those efforts we are now seeing progress. that progress is not sufficient. we need to keep making more progress. but the president is actually focused today on those -- those issues. and that's what you're going to hear how much can we keep making progress to reduce lower costs for people? i would say this, i think also is an area of contrast that the president will highlight. which is that he wants this economic conversation to focus on how we ca

it was divided into treatment costs, which included the hotel costs, and the costs related to the treatment itself, which if these are also separated. at that time, the person who chooses the private sector it is true that he pays this in the hotel cost , the treatment costs work well, the same 90% that he paid to the government insurance sector , we have little or no meaning there, on this side of the field , but nowadays, we are able to equal the non-hoteling pain treatment costs. this has not yet happened in the private and public sectors, but it is less close to the plan of faro, the supreme council of insurance, it happens that every year such a percentage that if an action happens to me, then this possibility will be provided, it is hoped that i will do it in another year. take a little more time based on the percentage of progress, but if it is based on this and resources insurance is provided by the supreme council, then this work may be done in one or two years. another point is that there was no insurance in persepolis 6, when we started , especially in the year 1304 101, we follo

of annual cost. and increasing city attorney work order cost for the additional support for the acquisition project. lastly there was an increase in waste water to balance source sxz uses in those enterprises. so once all of these mid-cycle changes have been incorporated, we see here again the same 23-24 operating budget. we emphasize again, capital is the most important cost driving and will continue to grow significantly. on the left side of the cost, capitol cost have accounted for 30 to 40% of the budget in the past five years. this means that 30% of every dollar we collect, goes to capital. this is expected to rise by 50%. this is due to our debt on water and sewer improvement program and any new debt that will be issued for our capitol plan. specifically, the sewer system improvement and large projects, are driving large increases in debt issuances and this drive-in crease s operating costs. the blue table shows what goes paying capital and hut will grow. by the end of the 10 years, two-thirds

or cost of construction. that total is 3 billion, 716 million dollars and includes certain allowances for defined elements of the project. we have been carrying $340 million for right of way acquisition. still seems appropriate. design contingency mentioned for the known and unknowns totals $856 million so a sizable amount. combined with the construction contingency of 37 o, we apply a program reserve on top of that for total estimated total at this time of 6 billion, 680 million dollars. again, in the presentation i will cover next, the project management oversight consultant in the next 6 months will engage to review the estimate, assumptions contingency and at thend the number may very well change and bring itback to the board for adoption as a baseline budget. it will serve as the cost estimate for the grants we seek. this is where we are at this point in time. that concludes this portion of the presentation talking about the cost estimate. i will turn it back over to oscar unless there are questions. no?

she is worried about a costly cost sprirl. anticipates they need to keep gradually raising the funtdz rate she says before she's going to stop, conditions need to be restrictive. she says the fed has to be prepared to continue increasing rates for longer than anticipated, and doing less on the other side if that's also necessary. the fed needs to be flexible to tighten further if needed. carl >> mike, let me turn to you. we talked this morning how fed speak would chew on this data point. >> there's certainly no all clear anywhere in sight. with the economy coming in more than their standing forecast i understand the indecisive reaction to the market the stock market is basically chased every twitch in treasury yield since. s&p up 1.1%. yesterday we closed exactly where we were a week ago friday. we made up last week's losses. range bound as we eye what yields have done and whether the higher for longer scenario is well priced in the markets or there's still, you know, room for more to be done. >> steve, give me a level set whe