she's got another— court of appeal. inst the charge of attempted murder that is going — charge of attempted murder that is going through the process at the moment. in the last few weeks. _ the moment. in the last few weeks, lucy letby has sacked her legat— weeks, lucy letby has sacked her legal team and taken a new team _ her legal team and taken a new team on— her legal team and taken a new team on board. they are looking at the _ team on board. they are looking at the evidence, because in the last few— at the evidence, because in the last few weeks there has been a growing — last few weeks there has been a growing number of sceptics who have _ growing number of sceptics who have raised concerns about the convictions and whether or not they— convictions and whether or not they were _ convictions and whether or not they were safe. but the fact is that this — they were safe. but the fact is that this was a child that went on for— that this was a child that went on for nearly a year, for ten months _ on for nearly a year,

the northern commercial court of appeal, where gorbasenko so dreams of going, has already been canceleds of decisions made by him. from the decision of the northern court of appeal of july 4. year, the decision of the commercial court of the kyiv region from february 23, 24, to be canceled. the lawsuit against the joint-stock company bilotserkivska teploelektrotsentral for invalidating the decisions of the general meeting shall be left without consideration. the shareholders believe that judge gorbasenko's actions have signs of raiding and illegal interference in economic activity and have reported this to the higher kvaliv commission, which must decide whether to continue. your career. three months ago, the supreme court of appeals again postponed the final decision on gorbasenko, which allowed him to remain in the judge's chair for the time being and even apply for a position in the appellate instance. meanwhile, the public council of integrity revealed new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion. actually, there was supposed to be a review and conclusion of the rev

from the resolution of the northern commercial court of appeal dated july 4 , 2024. the economic court of the kyiv region dated february 23, 2024 to be annulled. lawsuit to the joint-stock company. bilotserkivska teploelektrotsentral on invalidating the decisions of the general meetings, leave without consideration. the shareholders believe that judge gorbasenko's actions have signs of raiding and illegal interference in economic activity and have reported this to the higher qualifications commission, which must determine whether the judge will continue his career. three months ago, the supreme court of appeals again postponed the final decision on gorbasenko, which allowed him to remain in the judge's chair for the time being and even. to be appointed to a position in the appellate instance. meanwhile, the public council of integrity revealed new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion. actually, there should have been a review and the conclusion of the consideration of his suitability for the position, but the public council of goodness has moved

from the resolution of the northern commercial court of appeal dated july 4, 2024. ercial court of the kyiv region dated february 23, 2024 to be annulled. the lawsuit against the joint-stock company bilotserkivska teploelektrotsentral regarding the invalidation of the decisions of the general meeting should be left without consideration. shareholders believe that the actions of the judge gorbasenko has the characteristics of a raider. and illegal interference in economic activity and reported it to the higher kvaliv commission, which must determine whether the judge will continue his career. three months ago, the supreme court of appeals again postponed the final decision on gorbasenko, which allowed him to remain in the judge's chair for the time being and even apply for a position in the appellate instance. meanwhile, the public council of integrity revealed new facts of gorbasenko's dishonesty and made a new conclusion. actually, it should have been now. consideration and completion of the consideration and its question eligibility for the position, but the public

the northern commercial court of appeal, where gorbasenko so dreams of getting to, has already canceled a number of decisions made by him. from the resolution. of the night appellate economic court from july 4 , 2018, to cancel the decision of the economic court of kyiv region from february 23, 2024. lawsuit to the joint-stock company bilotserkivska teploelektrotsentral pro invalidate the decisions of the general meeting, leave without consideration. the shareholders believe that judge gorbasenko's actions have signs of raiding and illegal interference in economic activity, and have reported this to the supreme court. praised the commission, which is supposed to determine whether the judge will continue his career. three months ago, the supreme court of appeals again postponed the final decision on gorbasenko, which allowed him to remain in the judge's chair for the time being and even apply for a position in the appellate instance. meanwhile, the public council of virtue discovered new facts dishonesty of gorbasenko and made a new conclusion. actually, there should have been a review a

as the unscrupulous head of the economic court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko, instead of a shameful dismissal, he is preparing for a promotion in the appeals but first, traditionally, to the news. the tyvriv district court of the vinnytsia region was headed by judge ihor ratushnyak, who was sentenced to seven years in prison for corruption. last year in december , the higher anti-corruption court found ratushniak guilty of soliciting and receiving an illegal benefit. according to the investigation materials, in 2021 the judge considered a civil case regarding the recognition of ownership of 3 hectares of land and demanded $4,620 from the plaintiff for... passing a decision in his favor, the judge asked for 40 uah per each hectare. naboo detectives documented two transfers of funds. more than 50,000 dollars were taken from ratoshniak during the raid. on december 12, 2023, the higher anti-corruption court sentenced igor ratoshniak to seven years in prison with confiscation of property, two plots of land, a car, fifty thousand dollars and uah 22,000 deposited as a deposit. the court also prohibited the judge from holding positions in state bo

depending on what happens in the court of appeals? what role are they expected to play? guest: it definitely could. tiktok, if they lose, first they will ask for a temporary injunction, because the law -- if the law doesn't get put in place, then they will appeal to the supreme court so yes, we could see it go to the top if tiktok loses today. host: i guess in the larger sense, what impact could the case have on the congressional ability and willingness to regulate social media? guest: i like to think of this case is a kind of one-off. the national security argument and the involvement of the spectrum of china here kind of made lawmakers uniquely motivated to do something, whereas when it comes to american companies, like meta, google, snapchat, they are a little bit more prone to protect the lobbyists in those companies. i think that it shows that when congress really wants to regulate, they can get it together and do it, but that it is still a little bit rare. and if this law is not upheld, it's not a great show of confidence that congress is passing great tech laws. h

qualification commission referred the case to the judge. review by the full composition of the supreme court of appeals, which must make a final decision on his suitability for the position. and finally, we will introduce you to natalia semenova, judge of the apostolivsky district court of the dnipropetrovsk region. criminal proceedings were opened against the judge for official forgery of documents. it was later closed, but there are obviously gaps not only in integrity, but also in knowledge. criminal proceedings were opened against may, against me. the prosecutor can open criminal proceedings? investigator, what does an investigator do? i didn't understand the question, sorry. the supreme council of justice brought natalia semenova to justice for the fact that she constantly returned to the police reports on administrative violations on illegal grounds. if you pointed out to the question of the public council of integrity that the prosecutor's report was correct in itself, drawn up in accordance with the law. then what grounds were there to return it, when at the same time your decision is simply no

judges at the court of appeal ruled oliver campbell's conviction for the murder of baldev hoondle infe". our home editor mark easton has the background to today's ruling. first to say this is not one of those cases about an innocent man deemed to have been stitched up by the criminaljustice system. indeed, the court of appeal made it clear that they gave very little weight and dismissed suggestions that police deliberately misled and bullied mr campbell in order to obtain a false confession. however, they did quash the conviction on what they described as a narrow but very important basis. now, mr campbell suffered severe brain damage as an eight—month—old baby and continues to struggle with memory, with concentration and with retaining information. and what the court of appeal is saying is that there has been fresh scientific evidence which shows that someone with just such a mental impairment would have potentially meant the jury considering the reliability of that confession in a materially different context. and the judges also, it should be noted, declined to order a retrial on

the oligarch's representatives in the northern commercial court of appeal appealed to all panels of judgese case got to badgers. later, due to the media publicity, barsuk recused herself and the case went to her friend, judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, lyudmila kropyvna, whose panel eventually gave the shares of the company with multibillion-dollar assets to offshore companies connected to kolomoisky and the russians. lyudmila kropyvna, as it turned out, was also a guest at the wedding of the badgers, together with igor kolomoisky. the conflict of interests is obvious because of corrupt judges. oligarchs get access to property, they evade taxes, they get a monopoly on the market, they evade fines for environmental pollution and so on and so forth, and this makes them oligarchs. the presence of an oligarch at a judge's wedding, especially an oligarch once again, regarding whom the judge made a decision, well, this is an absolutely, absolutely unacceptable story. the decision to expropriate the poltava gzk was eventually recognized as illegal and canceled by the big one. dat

with tatyana shustrova, qualifications. acting judges who failed the interview with the supreme court of appealsceedings were opened against menu. but do all judges underestimate the value of their property? this apartment is in a rather old housing stock is located greetings, you are watching judicial control, and i am tatyana shustrova. despite the full-scale war, ukraine continues its path to the european union and does not stop in implementing reforms, including judicial reform. in ukraine. the qualification evaluation of judges is ongoing, almost 200 representatives of local and appellate judges must pass it, and during the first year of work, the vkks managed to conduct only about 130 interviews, so now it is actively trying to catch up and announce verdicts, in particular, regarding those servants of themis who want to keep positions we will introduce you to the brightest candidates, but first to the news. the supreme council of justice dismissed nataliya sharko, judge of the henichiv district court of the kherson region, who sided with the occupiers and makes illegal decisions against ci

have been going through -- let me start with the beginning of the time in 1994 when you went on the supreme court. you had been in court of appeals, chief judge, sentencing commission, clerk of the court, most people thought you were really prepared. when you went on the court did you feel prepared for a new job? >> what did i feel? >> well, harry blackman my predecessor told me you will find this unusual assignment. stark fear. that's what everyone feels. anyone who is appoint today the supreme court knows that lighting had to strike twice in the same place before you're appoint today the federal supreme court and you thought you could do the job, you thought so and then you were there and you wonder inside can i really -- can i really. i don't care how far back you two or when, whatever but somewhere within them, those first two or three years they're wondering around thinking just that. and that's why david sutter said takes three years minimum. william douglas said it takes five years and you sort of adjust. well, they'll just have to put up with me and i'll do the best i can and that's virtually any job that you will get in

sara, this will be a hearing before a very conservative court of appeals. three, trump appointed judges on the fifth circuit court of appeals will hear these arguments. were republicans are challenging mississippi's policies related to ballots as you just said, their challenging this policy where you can count ballots up to five days after the election, as long as they have the proper postmark, arguing that this is a violation of federal law. and i think the first question, a lot of people will likely have is, well, why are republicans so focused on mississippi? that's a state that's clearly going to go read in the upcoming election, but it's important according to remember that even though republicans lost at the trial court level, they're now before this very conservative court of appeals. and that court of appeals covers a states beyond mississippi. and in fact, 20 states in the u.s. have similar policies that could potentially be impacted depending how this case turns out sometimes where you bring the case as much about the case as what is being brought

attorney general can general to be a a judge on the sixth circuit court of appeals. he is opposed by both his home state of tennessee republicans marsha blackburn and bill hagerty. the house is back tuesday at noon eastern. members will consider a bill to prevent foreign interference in use elections by blocking foreign money from being sent to tax-exempt organizations to influence the american political system. the house will debate legislation to reauthorize funding for health and human services traumatic brain injury programs to 2029. authored by bill pascrell who died last month. also a bill awarding u.s. tennis legend billie jean king and congressional medal. if approved that would be sent to the president for his signature. watch live coverage of the house on c-span, the senate on c-span2. also you can watch all of our congressional coverage with our free video app c-span now or online at c-span.org. >> c-span now is a free mobile app featuring your unfiltered view of what's happening in washington live and on-demand. keep up with the days because events with li

let me start with the beginning of the time in 1994 when you been on the supreme court. you had been on the court of appeals, then chief judge of the sentencing commission. clerk to the court. ly prepared. hought when you went on the court did you feel prepared for your new job? >> what did i feel? well, harry blackmun, my predecessor, told me, you will find this an unusual assignment and indeed i would say what i felt my first year or two, stark fear. that is what everyone feels. anyone who is appointed to the supreme court knows that lightning had to strike twice in the same place before you are appointed to the federal supreme court and so you thought you could do the job. you thought so and then you're there and you wonder inside, can i really? can i really? a lot of people depend on it and i don't care how far back you go or when or wherever but somewhere within those first two or three years they are wondering around thinking just that, but they don't say it and that is why david souter said it takes three years minimum. william o douglas said it takes five years and you sort of adjust. you say well,

today the court of appeal quashed that conviction, but the ruling was not that mr campbell was an innocented. indeed, the court of appeal was very critical of an expert witness who had claimed that police bullying had caused mr campbell, who suffered severe brain damage as a baby, to make a false confession to the murder. what the judges said was that they were quashing the conviction on a narrow but very important basis. mr campbell has been trying to clear his name for 30 years. what changed today was thatjudges accepted that had modern scientific understanding about the risks of false confession from someone with the kind of mental condition mr campbell has been available at the original trial, it would have meant the jury considering the reliability of his confession in a materially different context. there was discussion on whether mr campbell should be retried to resolve the issues in the case, but the judges concluded that would not serve the public interest because mr campbell has already spent over a decade in prison the time is 6.17. the us presidential hopefuls attend a 9/11 mem

court of administrative justice previously held such responsibilities as a member and deputy of the supreme court of the country, the director of the high school of judiciary, the deputy justice and advisor of the courts of appeals of qom province, the assistant prosecutor of the administrative court of judges, the general director of the administrative judicial selection of the judiciary and the head of the clerical training center . he was in charge of the judiciary. the head of the prisons organization said: all those seeking help who have learned a specialized job in prison can use a low-interest loan after their release. skill training and creating employment for prisoners is a part of the judicial transformation document, which was compiled and implemented since the presidency of shahid raisi on the judiciary. in the name of allah , the merciful. he is an employer. i hope the day after serving a part of my imprisonment in prison , it will be one year. the court has revoked the verdict. my sentence was 7 years. i spent about 3 years. i thought that if i wanted to come out today, because it was the best thing for me, i came to work in production and started production. he started because he had the experienc

court of appeals heard arguments in tikok corporative merrick garland.o sell the up tik tok or face a in the u.s. force entire oral argument in cour eastern for online but c-span.org. democratic congressman j.d. ruskin talks about the recent debate vice president kamala harris and former president donald trump saying is remarkable. the wind is an hour back. the state of democracy, free speech of the 2024 election. free speech project. >> i think we will get started. we are live on c-span in addition to our audience here. from the director of the free speech project

, went to the court of appalls -- appealsd the court of appeals looked at it. that's e the law, yeah. these tribes have two-thirds of the state of maine. so, of course, we're all headed to the supreme court. see who gets two-thirds of the state of maine. we get a call from the white house, jimmy carter. hello, this is the president, carter. you guys ought to come to the white house and let's talk this over. state of maine wants to talk it over. okay. so we all a come to the white house, the tribal leaders talk with the state of maine and agree to settle the case instead of having one big winner and one big loser. so the tribes get away with a lot of land and a lot of money. not two-thirds, but pretty good chunk of it. lots of money for the land that hay had to give up. so next thing we knew here come some other eastern tribes. hey, that happened to usha too. we have the same, same situation as the other two tribes in maine. so one after another we started representing all these eastern tribes whose eastern states had come in

of women against him, no matter if this is part of a legal strategy in a court of appeals or not in the court of public opinion on the campaign trail, how is this not a gift to kamala harris? >> look, it's not helpful to his campaign i'm not sure if it's as big of a gift to vice president harris because we've heard it before so much of this is baked in voters out there are deciding upon this election. i mean, the sliver of voters whom have who are still undecided are likely not to be swayed by anything shocking that the former president has done. i mean, who could sort of get beyond the shock factor of what happened in 26 16 i mean, in the final i think back eight years ago really right now. during this point of the campaign, we all thought that are so many people thought that this was going to be politically devastating and dooming for him. it was not. so look, i think at this point what i am more short of intrigued by is how focused is he on the rates at hand? he is very much in the middle of a very, very competitive race. a different race than he thought he would have and what does t

will be 70 appeals court federal appeals court judges reaching the retirement age and if the next president gets to a point, 70 appeals court judges, that would be almost 40 percent of all the federal appeals court judges. the difference between the republican appointed judges and democratic appointed judges is stark and republican appointed judges created a new doctrine of criminal immunity just for donald trump with no previous presidents having criminal immunity from george washington to barack obama but suddenly a supreme court with three trump appointees granted donald trump criminal immunity and the three justices appointed by democratic presidents, obama and biden sided with the constitution against criminal immunity for donald trump. federal judges serve for decades. they exert power over the american people for decades. clarence thomas voted to overturn roe v. wade 32 years after he was appointed i george h.w. bush. there is a possibility that beginning next year, no federal judges, none, no federal judges will be confirmed for the next four years. and this is no matter how many of them retire. they won't be replaced if republicans control the united states

went to the court of and the court of appealslooked at it. that's the law. yeah. these tribes have two thirds of the state of maine, so of course, we're all headed to the supreme court. and see who gets two thirds of the state of maine and we get a call from. the white house, jimmy carter. hello. this is a person. carter, you guys ought to come to the white house. let's talk this over. the state of maine wants to talk it over. okay. so we all come to the white house. tribal leaders talk of the of maine and agree to settle the case. instead of having one big winner and one big loser. and so the tribes came away with a lot of land and a lot money, not two thirds, but pretty pretty good chunk of it. and a lots of money for the land that they had to give up. so. next thing we know, here comes some other eastern tribes. hey, that happened to us, too. we have the same same situation as. the personal parties in penobscot and. so one after another, we started all these eastern tribes whose eastern states come in and took their land with

of culture and arts, where oliynyk taught. after graduating from the university, the nephew got a job to work at the higher specialized court, where the oilman worked, and later transferred to the kyiv court of appealre alla oliynyk was a judge. i never even thought before that such questions might arise for me in the future, so that it would be a question of my integrity. it is also known that the panel of judges with the participation of ala oliynyk made a number of decisions, which were later recognized by the european court of human rights as violating international obligations and the european convention on human rights. however, after all, after examining all the facts. the advisory group of experts with the involvement of international specialists recognized alu oliynyk as professionally competent. the higher qualification commission of judges continues to conduct interviews as part of the assessment of the current employees of themis for their suitability for the positions they hold. this is kateryna sereda, the judge of the pechersk district court of the city of kyiv. i have certain, let's call them healthy ambitions in terms of my further career growth. kateryna sereda was appointed to th

the supreme council of justice finally dismissed the chairman of the poltava court of appeal, serhiy he is known for having lived in church, which he himself built. here is this house with an area of ​​661 m2, located in the suburbs of poltava. the national anti-corruption bureau recorded the extra-procedural communication of the judge with the lawyer and other judges regarding the so- called decision. issue in two proceedings about driving cars while intoxicated. one of them features the judge's son. in audio recordings of conversations recorded by naboo, galonkin promises his help. by and large. you know, we are normal people, we will always do anything, if we need help, we will always help. for this fact, the disciplinary chamber of the supreme council of justice deprived galonkin of additional payments for three months. the judge didn't like it, and he appealed the decision, hoping to avoid punishment altogether, but instead received a release. galonkin tried to postpone it, twice filed a motion to postpone the hearing, because he allegedly suddenly fell ill, and the vrp considere

breaking news i brought you earlier that oliver campbell has had his conviction quashed by the court of appealis attempt to overturn his conviction. he was a man with learning disabilities who was jailed in 1991 for the murder of a shopkeeper. he was interviewed without a lawyer present after being arrested for that fatal shooting during an off—licence robbery. we are keeping an eye on the actions. the foo fighters frontman, dave grohl, says he had a child outside of his marriage. in a post on instagram, the 55—year—old wrote that he loved his family and was doing everything to regain their trust and earn their forgiveness. he said he intended to be a loving and supportive parent to his new child. it's not clear who the mother is. mr grohl has three daughters with his wife, jordyn blum, who he married in 2003. now, it capped a fantastic summer of sport in the french capital — paralympics gb ended the paris games in second place behind china after securing 124 medals, matching their tokyo haul, but this time with 9 more golds. a little earlier i was joined by one of those returning uk gold meda

the 9th circuit court of appeals will have to figure it out. but we weighed in on the half of the tribes asserting this argument data sovereignty and tribes control that and we will see what happens. >> to be continued. with that thank you very much and think you john. it's been a pleasure. [applause] .. media, was founded on a powerful idea. cutting edge broadband to underserved communities. we have connected 850,000 miles. we broke speed barriers. now with media, mobile offering the fastest most reliable network on the go. media calm.

of court. he is now appealing that decision to the federal appeal's court, which has seven republican appointees and five democratic appointees. that has so far been perfectly fair. considering jack smith's previous appeal's of judge cannon's ruling that 11th circuit court of appeals is very likely to overturn the ruling and reinstate the criminal case against donald trump. but if elected president, he'll immediately fire jack smith and order the justice department to drop all criminal cases against him in federal court. then he'll appoint judge eileen mercedes cannon to the united states supreme court, after easily making clarence thomas an offer he can't refuse, to retire into a life of a very, very rich man with massive wealth, being instantaneously and legally handed to clearance thomas upon retirement. donald trump will make the same deal with justice samuel alito, who the new york times reports was removed by the chief justice from writing an important report after the flag sympathetic to the january 6 insurrection. defendants were flown at samuel alito's home. donald trump and corporate a

has happened to many other article three judges, some of whom were more district judges than court of appeals judges but they go on and have second careers in mediation or arbitration. i can think of judges i know from supreme court's in other countries with distinguished service on you end panels or bring their experience to bear. the kind of person who i think would be a judge for 18 years is already committed to public service. they are likely to say, i hope the department of x or y gives me a huge salary. if that's what they want to do they can leave over 2 -- after two years if they want to. they will still get it. i just don't think anything like that is likely to happen. and, one of the details about one of these 18 year plans is it is a term of years. if, for example, a justice tragically fell ill and died after three years of service you don't get any longer term. the president at that time can fill the remaining 15 years. the possibility of strategic retirement is far less under this program or idea then we have now. and there is another point i would make. that is that the current

court was challenged by all panels of judges until the case reached barsuk. later, due to the media publicity, barsuk recused herself and the case went to her friend, the judge of the northern commercial court of appealose panel eventually gave away the shares of the company with multibillion-dollar assets. offshore companies associated with kolomoiskyi and the russians. lyudmila kropyvna, as it turned out, was also a guest at the wedding of the barsuks, together with igor kolomoisky. the conflict of interest is obvious: because judges-corrupt oligarchs and get access to property, they evade taxes, they get a monopoly on the market, they evade fines for environmental pollution and so on and so forth, and this makes them oligarchs. the presence of the oligarch at the wedding in the judge. and even more so the oligarch once again, regarding whom the judge made a decision, well, this is an absolutely, absolutely unacceptable story. the decision to expropriate the poltava gzk was ultimately recognized as illegal and canceled by the grand chamber of the supreme court, and possible corruption the national anti-corruption bureau began to investigate ludmila kropyvna, because it was at the time when the judg

court of appeals f t d.c. circuit heard oral argument in tiktok incorporated vs. merrick garland, a case that challenges larequiring the chinese company bytedceo sell the app tiktok or face a ban in the u.s. watch the entire oral argument tonight at 8:00 easternn c-span, c-spanow our free mobile video app, or online at c-span.org. >> acting u.s. secret various director gave an update into the investigation on a second apparent u.s. assassination attempt on president trump at his mar-a-lago golf course. >> just a couple of housekeeping thing here's in case you haven't been with me at a press conference. we, meaning the yemen up here which is the u.s. attorney, f.b.i., secret service, we are going to give you everything that we have. we're going to give you the latest updates. they're going to tell you what's going on with the investigation. everything. then we're going to do a limited amount of questions, so make them good. don't get into what if and this. legitimate questions. got it? ok. everybody ready? ok. we're here today to give an update on the investigation

of the judicial process, of the trial process, of the inquiry, the way those systems work, the court of appeall published, which i would urge everybody to read, because that is absolutely, you know, a very, very key moment in this entire saga. and then there is, if you like, the court of public opinion and what is being said online. and those two things do not currently, across the entire piece, match up. and in fact, they're rubbing up against each other in some ways and in some places. and that is why you hear parents like those of e and f, who notjust... they're notjust seeing this, by the way, through the eyes of being the parents of babies affected, but they also went to the trial. they and the other parents were there in the courtroom throughout the first trial, and after that. and there are parents here at the public inquiry as well. and they say, you know, we saw all of this evidence, we saw the evidence that the jury was presented with as well, and we feel that the people who are commenting out there, who are saying that they have problems with this, were not in court. they didn't see

circuit court of appeal from 2005 to 2020. ture on law at harvard law school and fellow at the weekend student at brigham university he recently completed service on the presidential commission on the supreme court and has been one ofon the most eloquent voices in america for the idea of civic charity. and helped shape my view on the importance of healthy conflict, in fact, probably nobody, no one hadne more influence on my views about polarization in this country than this man. so please join me in welcoming judge tom griffith to the stage he's the one responsible for actually getting our supreme court justices here. judge griffith. [applause] [inaudible conversations] ♪ ♪ well governor cox thank you so much for that overly generous introduction. i'm very excited to be here today with two people who i greatly admire. so if you'll allow me, they actually need no introduction but toipght give them one so my right is justice sonia who was born in the bronx. to parents who were native puerto rican like many of us perry mason was a

yes, they already filed their notice of appeal of the second circuit court of appeals. make the argument that the hush money payments to miss daniels was entitled to immunity. their argument which the judge did not address was there was evidence and testimony brought out during his trial that they argue were official acts under the new supreme court decision. for instance, his conversation with hope hicks, when he was president, when she was the white house communications director, in the oval office. that judge cannot address that, he went back to his prior decision before the supreme court decision stating that hush money payments are not official so, acts. so, it is unclear, the court of appeals can still say we're not going to hear this, or they can grant it. the bottom line is the trump attorneys are doing everything they can to prevent him from being sentenced by judge merchan on september 18th. >> so, is it unusual, and, again, catherine, everything about this is unusual. but is it unusual for a judge to not address an issue that was specifically brought up by th

but as to the gag order, the new york court of appeals, the highest court in the state, saying there is no significant question that would justify an appeal before them at this time, jose. >> so lisa, is that it, or is there a possible appeal? >> reporter: there is a possible appeal. usually a state's highest court is the end road for litigants. but where there is a federal statutory federal constitutional question involved, you can go to the supreme court and hear what former president trump is saying as this impinges on his first amendment rights. so we may see an effort to go directly to the supreme court. but jose, i will warn you and our viewers that, of course, time is ticking before now and november 5th. and november 5th was really the basis on which former president trump wants this overturned. he wants to be able to talk about judge marchan's family, things that are part of the going order before the november 5th election. >> lisa rubin, thank you so very much. >>> today vice president kamala harris and former president trump are set to hold their first campaign event since

its relevance cannot be overestimated, because while the supreme court of appeals is delaying the verdict, the judge is already preparing for the competition for a position in the northern commercial court of appeal, which will take place in month. and for today i have everything, it was the judicial control program and i... tatyana shutrova. if you want to report corrupt judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this email address. see you in exactly a week. an unusual look at the news. good health, ladies and gentlemen, my name is mykola veresin. presentation of facts and competent opinions, for example, if mykola veresen had done this, he would have gone to prison. a special look at the events in ukraine, so it is not necessary to say that the fish rots from the head, no, not from the head, but beyond its borders, who then is china, my heart aches. all this in an informational marathon with mykola veresny. saturday 17:10, sunday 18:15 at espresso. a journalist who joined the armed forces, a political expert who became a special officer. events reports, comments of the

has been sent out and the truth is, we're not sure when they will be the state board of elections is appealing that court of appeals order to remove kennedy's name from the ballot. they've appealed to the state supreme court. but in the meantime, they have to comply with that order. so the staff spent the weekend beginning to reprocess coding new ones without rfk junior's name on it. do they say that it could take up to 13 days to re-code re-prep, and reprint all of those ballots across the state. one county official told me it is effectively starting all over from the beginning they all have to go out at the same time to ensure fairness. and it's a tall task according to the state board, there are 2,348 ballots styles across north carolina and more than 2.9 million had already been printed before the court of appeals order came down. and of course, all of this, the cost falls on the county's themselves, the board estimates that it's going to cause more than million dollars to redo everything. and while they've already blown past that september 6 date deadline, what they're really concerned about wolf is

judges at the court of appeal ruled oliver campbell's conviction for the murder of baldev hoondle inittle weight and dismissed suggestions that police deliberately misled and bullied mr campbell in order to obtain a false confession. however, they did quash the conviction on what they described as a narrow but very important basis. now, mr campbell suffered severe brain damage as an eight—month—old baby and continues to struggle with memory, with concentration and with retaining information. and what the court of appeal is saying is that there has been fresh scientific evidence which shows that someone with just such a mental impairment would have potentially meant the jury considering the reliability of that confession in a materially different context. and thejudges also, it should be noted, declined to order a retrial on the basis that mr campbell has already served a decade in prison and could not get a fair trial because of his serious handicap. mark easton. healthcare workers in the democratic republic of congo, who are at the front line of the mpox outbreak in the east of the

making an application to the criminal cases review commission to try and take her case back to the court of appeal earlier this year that letby case did go to the court of appeal down in london, where a panel of three judges heard fresh evidence. but in fact ultimately rejected that application to appeal. now, on the website for the criminal cases review commission, they say for the commission to be able to refer a case back to the appeal court, we will almost always need to identify some new evidence or other new issue that might give reasons for a fresh appeal. we must be able to show the court some new information that was not used at the time of the conviction or first appeal, and that might have changed the outcome of the case if the jury had known about it. so from the sounds of it, if mark mcdonnell and his team are going to be reaching out to the criminal case review commission, it sounds like perhaps they've got some new evidence or some fresh information that they believe could well have changed the jury's verdict, if it would have been provided at the time of the court case. so that wil

greenberg for the new york court of appeals and ernst and young from this court made clear that reliance by a counterparty, an actual harm to a counterparty are not required for liability for any of the claims here. and remember to think about the illegality claims as well, because it's not just fraud, it's very finish the question. so for the illegality claims, you look to the underlying penal law provisions and for something like issuing false financial statements, there's no requirement for reliance, there's intent and there's materiality which was proved at trial. but if someone issues a false financial statement to their counterparty, the counterparty gets it and is not fooled, picks up the phone and calls the enforcement parties. the prime has still been committed even though the counterparty didn't rely on it at all. >> so you pointing to ernst and young, you pointing to first american, ernst in younger dealing with the collapse of lehman brothers, first american, you're dealing with an action brought against an appraiser will overvalued pratt properties at the behest linda perpet

one of his attorneys in this appeal here in front of the appeals court trying to get the decision that made in 2023, that was made by a jury, we should repeat, made by a jury that found donald trump to have sexually abused e. jean carroll. this was going before the appeals court. donald trump for the better part of the last 30 minutes now has been essentially doing exactly what led to the defamation liability found against him earlier this year by a separate jury in which he was penalized for $83 million. he is continuing here at trump tower right now where this press conference is taking place, he is saying that he did not know e. jean carroll, he never met her. there's a photo of them together. he is saying that he regrets not going and testifying before that jury in early 2023 and blaming his attorney for telling him it was beneath the office of the presidency. of course, he was the ex-president at the time. he should not go and testify before that jury to his own defense. that jury found him guilt -- or i should say liable of sexual abuse and defamation. we heard -- you can see in

court of appeals which sits in chicago and in 2017 and to the united states supreme court in 2020 and we are honored to have both of you here today and governor cox mentioned how this came about and it was at a meeting last spring where they convened a lot of people and i was one of many in that group and i did raise my hand and made a bold assertion which was, i would like the american people to get an inside view into how the federal courts do their business and for 15 years i sat on the dc circuit and i wish the american people could see what i saw, dedicated people, passionate disagreements but all done based on recent arguments, civility and's -- respect. i made this bold point and i went further and said i think we could even get some supreme court justices to come talk about that and at that point i thought what a bite done or said and fortunately, it was easy to do because these are two fabulous jurists and great americans were dedicated to civility of discourse. what we will do in the next hour is i will lead a conversation and ask questions that hopefully get things flowing

the court of appeals and the supreme court are done by seniority. am second-most junior, so it goes justice sotomayor, justice gorsuch and then me on our end, we have assigned seating. if i see justice sotomayor's light is on, i want try to jam in my question before she has a chance to talk. i can ask my question next. if i speak, justice jackson is the only one junior to me, and so on. we have those rules and we try to keep and i on our time so none of us is not the lysing the floor too much. i have some questions i want to ask in advance, but some just develop in the course of the argument. i spent many years as a law professor and in many respects, it's kind of like a classroom back-and-forth where you are talking about ideas, exploring ideas, asking questions. oral argument matters. i have changed my mind even at the supreme court. i have changed my mind raced on an oral argument. it often matters to the scope of an opinion. justice sotomayor asked more than once in the last two years, how would you want us to write this opinion? that can be a h

of liberty. soon the case will be considered by the court. edward bondarev faces up to 5 years in prison. the security service of ukraine has appealedthe supreme council of justice and is asking to punish the judge of the brovary city district court, volodymyr serdynskyi, who is accused of receiving $4,000 in illegal benefits. the judge is also suspected of forging documents for a trip to a cruise on... according to the decision of the second disciplinary chamber of the ukrainian people's republic of ukraine, the complainant requests to bring the judge of the brovar district court of the kyiv region, serdynsky, to disciplinary responsibility for engaging in behavior that discredits the title of a judge or undermines the authority of justice, in particular in matters of morality, honesty, incorruptibility, compliance with the judge's lifestyle, his status, compliance with other norms of judicial ethics and standards of conduct that ensure public trust in the court. previously, the security service. informed the judge of the brovar city district court, volodymyr serdynskyi , about the suspicion of forgery of documents and fraud. in th