continue the hearing of this case will be held on tuesday of next week in the 11th branch of criminal court no. 1 in tehran. mehdi javadi of sed and cima news agency. salam alaikum and rahmatullah , we will start with the minister of roads and hosting an exhibition, which was part of the name ferangi, sanat exhibition. i will participate in the events that i go to. if friends had entered, the slides of the minister of economy's slide would not have been turned into a cover sheet . when i returned , i saw the same previous slide as the next slide of mr. khandozi's model. leverage the model kurd said that the banks themselves could not go beyond the foreign words of the stock market. please respect the persian language standards as a pilot in several provinces and in several groups . it is part of the main parameters and the copyright code of imported goods to the country of the speaker of the parliament and the tribune who said from the podium or stand, i will not say this today behind the tribune. and the sign he gave to ferangi, but i will address you in the parliament to the speaker of the p

court , the hearing of this case will be continued on tuesday next week in the 11th branch of criminal court noehran," mehdi javadi of the iraqi government's sda news agency said in a statement. the united states condemned the early morning attack on the headquarters of iraqi security forces and hasht al-shaabi as a hostile act. the iraqi government considered this attack an unacceptable violation of iraqi sovereignty and emphasized that this action , contrary to the stated position of the united states , is aimed at strengthening relations with iraq. fighters this morning american to several headquarters of iraqi forces located in the center.

it will be held on tuesday next week in the 11th branch of criminal court no. 1 in tehran.di javadi of sed and cima news agency. optimal manufacturing process isfahan, qom, tehran, seri and sir railway. as the executive vice president says, 70% of the infrastructure of this project between qom and isfahan has been completed.

of the court, the continuation of this case will be held next tuesday in the 11th branch of criminal court no.1 in tehran. mehdi javadi of sed and cima news agency. the favorable trend of the construction of the isfahan, qom, and tehran railways. as the executive vice president says that 70% of the infrastructure of this project between qom and isfahan has been completed. mr. mansouri announced the progress of 70% of the infrastructure of this project in the game of the high-speed train project between tehran, qom, isfahan. from the operational point of view, the distance between qom and isfahan is 20 km and about 50 km, 245 km, of which 150 km , 70% of the infrastructure has been operationalized , numerous bridges, tunnels, various infrastructure buildings and high-quality technical operations have been carried out. referring to the financial and management problems of this project, the executive vice president said: problems the management of this project includes a difference of opinion between the infrastructure and road development company and the railway company , which will be resolved

to saudi arabia or to the emirates of order. in the arrest issued by the international criminal court, there is no widespread use of the mechanisms of bringing the leaders of terrorist countries to justice, this is a problem of modern international law, modern institutions, more and more we we make sure that such things, which were supposed to work, worked to some extent in the 90s, the boolean years, such as, for example, interpol, well, it discredited itself. that reacted to the red cards issued by russia in relation to ukrainian volunteers, for example, officials or someone else, and even among our colleagues there are people who were detained at the airports of third countries until the circumstances are clarified precisely because there are russian plans against them , the russian interpol was put on the card, that is, the mechanisms of prosecution, and even more so of successful trials, which was recognized. would the leadership of the russian federation fully, the entire leadership, without exception , not specifically some officials there who made this or that decision, the entire russian

mechanisms and certainly within the un itself there's no court with no standing corporate jurisdiction to entertain claims, the the international criminalcriminal court, and at the end of the day that court only has jurisdiction against individuals, not against some state apparatus, so it's difficult, where there's no enforcement mechanisms, there are in effect no meaningful rights and we're seeing that now play out in occupied palestine for many many decades, against the backdrop in which the occupation know only too well that they can count on their... atlantic world allies led by the elephant in room the us had jam to run political interference at every level to make okay everything they do, even though it clearly is not. all right, thank you, mr. grossman, always a pleasure to check in with you, sir, stay safe, talk to you soon from bally, indonesia, mr. barry grossman, they're joining us, international lawyer, meanwile pro-palestinan rallies continue throughout the world a daily basis demanding an end to this israeli war on gaza in the us, dozens gathered outside the israeli embassy in washington dc, calling for a permanent seasfir

on the other hand, we are under no obligation to comply with the judgment of the international criminal courthe hague, so again we are, no, no, but no word on what we will do in the event that... if putin comes and there is some , well, i don’t know, some order from the international criminal court, what to do then, well , i just looked at the statement of the brazilian authorities in march of 2023, brazil declared its readiness to arrest putin, it is a signatory country of the rome statute, but now they are not ready, but they are spinning, they are not saying that they are not ready, they are trying, probably in front of putin, to say yes no, no no no, we, we are good, we are beautiful, we are this, and with the other... who knows, and what will happen, that's why i'm sure that putin will not come, you can get lost in the favelas somewhere in the riviera, in principle, no one can get out of there, well, this is an option and a very good option, i would say , that's a joke, a speech, about putin, let's move on, i'm sure that espresso viewers know very well that putin's election in russia, wh

criminal court that has an investigation that is open. it has been ongoing for some times and it seems very, very important that the international criminal court is pears, no effort, and locates the necessary resources to investigate the daily strikes on civilians. and that in so far as we've been able to establish our strikes the pipe, disproportionate, that's our indiscriminate and some of them are direct attacks on civilians. on those 3 types of attacks are violations of international humanitarian law and close the tooth one crimes. they haven't been investigated again, the international criminal court holy united states, as well to account given neither countries, a signatories, international criminal court has a monday to investigate and prosecute the violations that are committed on the lands of in the occupied territories. so the attacks that are being carried out in gaza are within the competence of the international criminal court. and indeed the prosecutor of the international criminal court has himself stated that his office is investigating a tax based in, in gaza and, and denise bell. and it's important that you know that those investigations

telling the international community or maybe in the future or the the international criminal court, oh we want these people, no you didn't, you can't just still someone, you know, leave, come the place in five seconds, this is what the basically the israeli regime is doing to us in gaza, yeah warning you to do the impossible, sure, thank you so much for that, take good care of yourself and your family, now palestinians in gaza experiencing grief and loss, like you just saw. correspondent speak and they're desperate looking for their basic needs, residents in the southern city of continus recounting their sufferings caused by the israeli war. this morning my father asked me to go and sell some of our weed. then he left the school where me and my family are taking shelter. there was an israeli rocket attack, then my father was killed, now we have to find a place to bury him. i'm in gazza. "i am from gaza city, the israeli army displaced us to hanyuns and told us that it will be safe here, nowhere is safe in kanunes or anywhere else. we haven't received any aid or assistance from anyone, we were left defend for o

who has been convicted in a senate impeachment trial can face lawsuit including criminal prosecution in the courts there is no jeopardy protection from double jeopardy against prosecution. larry: but he was not convicted. >> w that does not make a difference, not a criminal providing, not a legal providing. larry: you say it is political? >> impeachment? >> is it li political proceeding only about stripping political power. he does not face a fine like in criminal system. larry: you say, he may win trump could win on immunity trial, but, you are not sure about the double jeopardy. >> i don't think that he -- i don't think that double jeopardy argument has much weight. the immunity question is a significant question and charges in the case, i think that trump would hit the gold mine if he could get the supreme court to look at charges in the case. larry: all right. and that seems likely, right, they will look at it? that pushes everything. >> they are the supreme court, they can decide what to loc look of at, they still have not decided that, we'll know more about a week. larry: do you think that john roberts,

the... mit of the prosecutor karim, karim, the international criminal court, now what we need also is to win the information war, you have no doubt observed the kind of propaganda, the kind of public relations being conducted by the israeli government, and here couple of days ago in geneva at the club swiss de la press in the geneva press club, the israelis uh made a special presentation demonizing the palestinians. now article 20 of the international covent on civil and political rights prohibit precisely this kind of insightment to hatred of palestinians, this kind of incitement violence against palestinians and muslims and arabs etc. the um depiction of palestinians uh as terrorists or criminals etc. the generalization, the collective punishment, the collective guilt that is being imposed on the palestinian. all of that is contrary to the international covenant on civil and political rights. once again uh antonio guterrez should have appealed to the uh security council weeks and weeks ago. "i welcome the fact that he has done it now, and i wish that the international press would discover responsibility to protect. this i

case being investigated by the international criminal court, which could potentially lead to new arrest warrants against putin and russia's top leadership, and noattention. community has allocated 2023 to a case that the international criminal court cannot consider, namely the investigation and prosecution of russia for the crime of aggression against ukraine. there is a group of states that are working on plans to hold russia accountable, about 38 countries, and they meet every two months in different locations. there are two different visions, one vision is that it should be an international tribunal, because... there was a terrible crime against the ukrainian people, a crime of aggression against ukraine, as well as against the world order. the international center for criminal prosecution for the crime of aggression against ukraine, which was opened this year in the gaa , is called a harbinger of the tribunal over russia. the new center will contribute to the collection, systematization and preparation of data for a potential international trial on charges of aggression against ukraine by russia. this is one of the first steps towards attra

courts of two things. first of all, that there is such a thing as criminal immunity for a federal official. we don't know the answer to that. we probably will get an answer yes or norom the courts in the course of this case. but second, donald trump has to convince the courts that even into there is such a thing as criminal immunity. he was acting within his job as president and here we have a court of appeals saying, no you were not. you were acing outside of your role as president. now different courts of appeals might differ. but this is headed up to the u.s. supreme court. we're going to get some real ground breaking decisions here with massive consequences. >> michael, do agree it is likely heading to the u.s. supreme court? >> yeah, i think we're watching the regular old football season and nothing really matters until we get to the super bowl. that is where this thing is headed. you've got different courts saying different things and it is just not going to matter until we get there. that is also something to keep in mind about all of the scheduling for the trial. the defendants here and trump's lawyer in atlanta is doing a good job of laying out the consti

court. remember that? the question is why? well, because he was hoping he could show that the criminal conduct he was accused of having committed wasn't criminal at all. no, he wanted the court to believe that that conduct was part of his official duties in the white house. now if the court agreed with him, then he could say he would be immune from prosecution because it was official duties and the next stop on that legal train would be dismissing the case. well, a three-judge panel on the 11th circuit court of appeals didn't agree. they didn't buy his argument, that attempting to allegedly alter valid election results in favor of a particular candidate or maybe engage in a conspiracy had anything at all to do with the duties of a chief of staff. so that means no ability to invoke federal immunity and escape prosecution and, oh, no moving his case to federal court. why does all of this blast from the past matter? well, it's very much in the present. we're waiting to hear if the supreme court will waive some pretty similar arguments about donald trump. is the conduct he's accused of having committed part of his official presidential duties and, if so, wou

no immunity from prosecution or civil liability. it's a rejection of his fundamental argument that he is immune from anything, lawsuit, civil, criminal prosecution. we'll hear from appellate courtsn the criminal stuff. on the civil side, it's pretty well settled that his argument had no precedent that supports it. >> we heard from judge chutkan in the federal case that she wrote that the job of president, quote, does not confer a lifelong get-out-of-jail-free pass. she's very clear in her words. >> remember, going back to the mueller investigation, one of the reasons that mueller said he couldn't bring charges against trump was because he was a sitting president and the office of legal counsel said you can't bring charges against a sitting president, because it would be too disruptive to the government. but, of course, once he leaves office, it's fair game. chutkan, following on that said, well, he's now left office, he's now fair game. mitch mcconnell in his speech at the time of the impeachment said the same thing. so it's pretty classic that when you are private citizen trump, then you are liable for the criminal acts that you un undertake, whether you're taking them now or w

israel, that's basically the situation now, look at the international criminal court, whose british flunky, he's not a con, but he's no, he's an apple state, if he was ever... uh muslim, he wasn't, because he's uh pro israel, and he just insists that he's not going to prosecute israel, and if you uh try craig murray tried to take, to the international court of justice and no one would take it because they say it would win, and we can't let israel be accused of genocide, so you see it's a judaic mentality that the whole west is living under, we're we're mesmerized to the point where we we our leaders are laughing stocks, they can't you see the images and they it's the blind, so it's... very uh, but there we are protesting, we have demonstrations, i'm missing one right now uh, almost every day, and uh, trudo finally, uh, came out with ceasefire, so he, that was very bold, it's the first time he's ever done anything that's not 100% pro israel, pro us, so that, but uh, you know, it's still uh, it's um, uh, grain of sand in the desert, so i don't know where this is all going to end, but uh, it certainly should wake up peop

courts. but one very important legal matter, there's no obligation for an individual to be prosecuted or criminally convicted before the courts, perhaps up to and including the supreme court, make the finding that that person was an insurrectionist under the 14th amendment. and here, john, this is probably the clearest area under the law because of the comments on the ellipse because of that tweet targeting mike pence. because of the 187 minutes of inaction. because of the findings which colorado did consider of the january 6th committee that donald trump engaged in insurrection. there is very powerful evidence to ground the colorado courts finding in that regard. whereas in michigan they didn't make a finding on that because they said in a primary we don't have the power to make this constitutional determination. by the way, the lower court in michigan noted could be different in the general election. so it'll be very interesting to see what questions the supreme court answers, if any, and what guidance it provides. and we may be back up there in the runup to the general election on the same issue

thing every ceo in the room would say, if they were facing criminal indictments and if they were convicted in a federal or state court, there's noceivable way any company in the country would keep that man on the -- as ceo. that's a situation we may be facing with the united states in the next year. [applause] >> that's all fair. in america, you get your due process. did you think anybody in here as ceo, the court is going to bring you win because of how you evaluate your real estate? do you think anybody else is going to be brought in based upon a d.a. that gets elected? there's politics and everything we play. if you want to look, the democrats have come after trump from an aspect they thought they would take him out of the running by some of these indictments. all it's done is elevate him to get elected. it played the other way around. i think that frustrates people. >> let's talk about trump. the ceos in the room will also -- trump looks like he may win right now. he's well ahead in the republican nomination. we are less than a year away from the election. what do you think a second trump term would look like? a lot of ceos

. >> in courts, civil and criminal, they have weighed in on that and they've said no, they are not official acts and we will see with the appeals court says. the more interesting question might be, when we hear what the appeals court says here. they're going to hear arguments on january ninth, but this still could go quickly, right? >> it still could go relatively quickly. i don't want to get anyone excited but in the grand scheme of federal appeals, getting a case brief and argued by january 9th is breakneck speed. the appeals court could rule on the case within a matter of days or weeks and then it's up to the supreme court to decide for one, if they even want to take the case in the first place. remember, the supreme court does not have to take a case and they could let it go and let the lower opinions stand. the supreme court could rule quickly or as people know, it could take months and months. so it really is an open question as to when the trial does proceed, whether it is march, that's probably not likely or sometime thereafter or even the on the election. but it is moving quickly i

so that -- in other words, it's not the lack of a criminal prosecution that's leading the courts to say no, this isn't sufficient, and so i think for all those reasons, i don't think that we're going to see a superseding charge by jack smith on this count and i think strategically, that is the right move. >> and this concludes the faculty meeting at the nyu law school meeting. andrew weissmann and melissa murray, you are free to go about the rest of your evening. thank you both very, very much. we've got much more on tonight tonight's bombshell breaking news out of the state of colorado where trump is now, as of tonight, disqualified from the ballot. more when "the reidout" continues. (singing )i'll be home for christmas you can plan on me. please have snow and mistletoe. and presents on the tree. kids at shriner's hospitals for children are able to go home and be with their families for the holidays. and that's only possible because of the monthly donations from people like you. thanks to a generous donor every dollar you give can help twice as many kids like me and have double the impact

>> one thing every ceo would say is, they were facing criminal indictments and if they were convicted in a federal or state court, there is no conceivable way any company would keep that man out as ceo. that may be the situation we are facing with the united states for the next year. rep. mccarthy: that is all fair, but in america you get your due process. do you think anybody in her who ceo, the court will bring you win because of how you value your real estate? do you think anybody else's going to be brought in based upon ada that gets elected? there's politics and everything we say. the democrats have come after trump from the aspect that they thought they were taken out of the running from the indictments. all it has done is elevated him to get elected. i think that frustrates people. >> i do want to talk about other things. the ceos in the room, trump looks like he may well win right now. he's ahead of the republican nomination. we are less than a year away from the election, when you think a second trump term would look like? whatever they may think about trump's character probably do like the things he did. he took a

court given that? >> well, i think the civil and criminal differences are significant here. there's nodamental right to be a presidential candidate unlike your liberty interest when you're a criminal defendant, and so we think and hope that the u.s. supreme court does what the two courts that have done so far in colorado, and we believe the factings in the law. ashlgs gen,er with, particular low given the care and hard bork that kl kohl reportses. >> eric, i very much appreciate your time, and ash obviously a significant win for your time. out front now, david axelrod along with joan . this is seismic. you've run presidential campaigns and you have a primary election in colorado beginning in march and you have to print the ballots and do all this, and now you have the former president of the united states and the colorado supreme court, they said take his name off it. how do you even respond to that if you're a campaign? i think it's safe to say this was a seismic ruling. >> well, there's no question about it, erin. one thing that hasn't been mentioned is three other states have gone t

as journalists wrote, no supervision was established over the dangerous criminal. after his release, the court the police and comply with restrictions. don't leave the house at night, don't go to alcohol stores, do not leave krasnoyarsk. popenko appealed this decision. that is why , in fact, no one was keeping an eye on dangerous criminals. as a result, a week later he committed a new crime. based on the collected regional ones. the investigative committee of russia and the krasnoyarsk regional court issued a guilty verdict against a resident of devnogorsk. taking into account the position of the state prosecutor, the perpetrator was sentenced to life imprisonment to be served in a special regime correctional colony. after the verdict was announced ivan popenko ignored the journalists' questions. tell me, will you appeal the verdict, no? ivan, how did you take the verdict? what do you think? the killer of the high school student will go to serve his sentence in a special regime colony, this is the highest criminal measure. punishment in russia in such correctional colonies , prisoners are kept

court, workers. the criminal procedure code was abandoned a challenge to the vaunted western military-technical potential. nognificant was assistance to personnel from civil society. i would like to note the unprecedented support of our people, who, thanks to the patriotic spirit of unity, are a reliable support for the fighters of the special military operation. let me emphasize that it is all common efforts. at the front today we helped our troops seize the initiative on the line of combat contact with the enemy. the russian army is constantly occupying more advantageous positions and expanding its controlled territories in all directions. we are consistently moving towards achieving the stated goals of special operations. in the current situation, the ministry of defense continues its planned activities to build strong, reliable ones. we continue to work, and not only in the marinka area, but progress or, let’s say , an improvement in the position is observed in many directions, and, what is very important, there is no need to rush to open the champagne, there is no need for victorious reports, the enemy

court. what's important to remember with respect to that is, regardless of whether donald trump wins the presidency or not, mark meadows is going to face criminal charges in state court. there is noump manages to wiggle out of this, mark meadows does not. so, for him and his counsel, he is going to have some tough decisions to make because he will be facing those charges. >> right. andrew weissmann and barbara mcquade, we'll be watching this together with you. thank you, both, very much for coming on the show this morning. >> greatly appreciate it. >>> richard haass, let's go back to russia, the ukraine war, and let's look, headlined right now in today's "new york times," talks about how putin turned a western boycott into a war chest bonanza, talking about how he further enriched himself, further enriched his allies when western companies departed russia. turned that into a scheme to make everybody around him richer. talk about where putin stands today compared to a year ago and the challenges facing zelenskyy in ukraine, as support, again, seems to waver, not only in europe but also in the u.s. >> look, domestically, putin seems pretty strong. he controls the political narrativ

criminal code to penalize me for renting rooms, there is no such article in the criminal code, but there is administrative code and there is an article for petty hooliganism. fight, fill out the documents in courtng everyone, i ask you to go to the canteen to celebrate my new position, what is necessary, he should be tried for making a false call, but he should be hanged, it’s a disgrace. ritka, the information reached us here that you want to buy a war horse, it will take away the headache, that’s for sure. where does the money come from , and the citizen is a potapinka, well, let’s quickly admit to an illegal source of profit, no, i won’t say, okay, okay, mom and dad sent it for her birthday, but i saved it for her myself, you’re lying, no, you take bribes, yeah, well those, but seriously, what kind of car do you want to take, from a showroom or a used one, no, guys, where did i get the money for a showroom car, i beg you, yes then you first need to learn how to drive, correctly, and then buy a new one, so a used one, well, i hope i don’t need to remind you, yes, that everything is to check the numbers there. body-engine, yes, captain igor, of course , so, gentlemen, we have a triple murder,

relating to trump that a sitting president is not immune from criminal process, meaning they have to answer a subpoena, for example. but no supreme courtr passed on the exact question presented here, which is about immunity from criminal prosecution and ultimate criminal accountability. on the other hand, is this immunity argument the trojan horse through which they are sneaking in their real aim here, which is delay, delay, delay? yes. >> ken, let's talk about trump's georgia election interference. we have fani willis telling "associated press" it was a silly notion to expect her to pause her case because trump's running for office. more of trump's co-defendants could take plea deals, so a couple of newsy nuggets there. what are you watching for most closely in this case? >> the big question in this case is whether fani willis can get donald trump into the defendant's doc at some point before the november election. that's what she wants to do. i have no doubt she will not respect any kind of donald trump campaign timetable. but this case is so complex, and there's so many defendants, it really depends how quickly the judge can move it

international criminal court , what does this lead to, but it is about individuals, the organization is required to hold this international organization accountable, well, that is, in fact, there are no other than the rules of nato itself, no rules other than the rules of nato itself, the result is history, when this famous connection between crime and punishment turns out to be categorically broken, because nato. we’ll see in the future, i’m sure nato won’t succeed in the last one, that’s for sure plot, yes, well, before that i can’t help but mention georgia, which 4 months before the bombing of south ossetia was promised nato membership, 4 months in 2008, april nato summit in bucharest, august this provocation, mr. saakashvili’s adventure, and ukraine, who then in bucharest in the eighth year promised the same membership, well, thank god. at some stage this did not turn the heads of the then ukrainian leaders, unlike the leaders of the coup of the fourteenth year, which took place with direct omission of state intervention nato, and the subsequent attempts to draw ukraine into the alliance in the most direct way, the refusal of any discussion of this topic with russia, everything t

court of appeals. judge tanya chutkan says she no longer has jurisdiction over some aspects of the criminal case. whether or not trump is immune from prosecution is being considered by the court of appeals right now. the special counsel overseeing the case has also requested the u.s. supreme court weigh in on the matter. katelyn polantz explains why the judge made this decision. >> reporter: essentially she has to. she doesn't really have another option. because in donald trump's criminal case before he goes to trial, the courts have to figure out two things. if donald trump can even be tried. he was already tried by the senate, is that double jeopardy now that he's charged again in a criminal court of law? so they have to decide that. and also they have to decide a question about presidential immunity. is donald trump protected from being charged with any crime for something that he did while he was president. something that he may argue was part of his role as the president of the united states. now, all of this is up in the air. there is a lot of wheels turning in the courts right now. what is

donald trump's argue that he has absolute immunity from criminal prosecutions through the actions he took in the presidency, and the court really said nos not bestow on you that define right of kings. this is from her opinion. to evade criminal accountability that governs all other citizens. she was very clear the constitution does not, provide this kind of immunity that he is seeking for anyone that has committed a crime while in office. and he is subject to federal investigation, he is subject to indictment, it's subject the prosecution, conviction, and any punishment for any acts he took an office. it's a very strongly worded opinion. and then as to his other motion to dismiss based on constitutional grounds, she designed that as well. and there, he was arguing that this indictment criminalizes his speech and is in violation of the first amendment, and she said, it's well-established the first amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime, and the indictment sets up all of the statements that were being used in furtherance of a crime. that's not violating his first amendment rights. so, this was a really

. >> this is from "the washington post," quote -- no other appeals court has dealt with a criminal defendant is sultaneously running for president and denouncing his prosecution as political in campaign speeches and court filings. the u.s. supreme court has never weighed in on the constitutionality of gag orders against any criminal defendant. the unique nature of this case extraordinarily challenging. >> that's it exactly, alicia. there are tools out there, and they're accurate. any other defendant that did this things, they would have conditions of release. he's out on release with certain conditions that he's vimt violated flagrantly. he's playing chicken against almost the entire court system nobody wants to be the judge who orders him incarcerated. what will happen with each success i have been violation, they'll have have to, do it again or again, we really mean it. at that point it will be to trump whether he wants to force the ultimate remedy, because tim is right, a fine won't do anything, of incarceration. and they're trying like crazy to avoid it, but it is precisely unique and in

court on january 5th. if there's no challenge to what the state hospital has determined in criminal proceedings will continue. >> and that was quite it's tough anion reporting for us tonight. coming up, why san francisco is now facing a hefty lawsuit by general motors. general motors is suing san francisco to recover more than 100 million dollars in tax payments. agm claims the city charge the company higher taxes because it linked gm's cruise self-driving car division with the company's 3 billion dollars in global revenue. and that's despite the company saying that it operated crew separately from g m while the automaker also argues that sold just 677 $100 of goods in san francisco. the company also seeking 13 million dollars in penalties. with the new year comes new tax bracket. seg irs is putting in place higher limits for federal income tax bracket. starting on the first. >> that means americans may be able to retain more of their income brackets are increasing by about 5.4% for both individual and married filers the top tax rate remains at 37%. the new bracket starts at just over $609,000. the irs as a

criminal defendant. now what is happening is instead of it going directly to the supreme court after the trial judge made the decision and said no, donald trump, you do not have immunity. we will not dismiss this case against you. you will go to trial. instead, it is going to go to the appeals court above the trial judge. the dc circuit court of appeals. they are indicating they are ready to go very fast. they have oral arguments set for january which is really fast for that court. then after that, then it would go potentially back to the supreme court where the question would be pose again. >> that could affect the supreme court's decision. to be clear, this needed five votes from the justices. we don't know if there were any dissents or not. none of that was made public. >> no. just this one line they were denying the petition at this time. so, we just don't know what the thinking was or what the vote was. >> and the big question is what would this mean for the trial potentially? it is still on the books but whether it happens in march is another question. >> it's on the books for march 4th. everything in preparation for the t

court on january 5th. if there's no challenge to what the state hospital has determined in criminal proceedings will continue. >> and that was flooded. stephanie and reporting for us tonight. kron 4, of course, always following election developments and we're tracking candidates in the race for the u.s. senate seat. dianne feinstein left behind. we have heard from the east bay congresswoman barbara lee and katie porter. >> and now we're taking a look at republican and former dodger and padres player steve garvey. frank buckley reports. >> steve garvey was a champion on the baseball field was game bases loaded. we've got a ground out that took us to a new york and the 81 world series, which we beat the yankees and in 5 games. but will the dodgers legend to be a winner on election day? garvey is now running as a republican for u.s. senate and he is rising in the polls. this one from politico has garvey in second place among the candidates that 19% behind the front runner, the democratic representative adam schiff, who is at 28%. it's the first poll showing garvey ahead of democratic representatives, katie port

there is no gulag, they publish also a letter from this man to the international criminal court in russianm at the airport in amsterdam, we just got off the plane gate, we just got here. here comes the dutch police. journalists of radio liberty 's system and schemes project found out that the former russian serviceman igor salikov, who appealed to the international criminal court, is one of the co-founders of the russian organization that started the so-called private military company redut. sources of schemes in the ukrainian special service and. in one of law enforcement agencies confirmed that this is indeed ihor salikov. according to the scheme and system investigation, the fighters of the redoubt armed formation fought in syria on the side of the regime of bashar al-assad, and later this pmc was transformed and came under the leadership of the main intelligence agency of russia and recruited fighters for various different divisions of the redoubt, which are now participating in the war against ukraine. rfe /rl's investigators also add that as a result of analyzing profile biographies.

no force can surrender our nation. now the martyr's brother is waiting for the start of the court in which the criminal case of the perpetratorsof these assassinations is to be investigated, but today is tuesday, the 21st of azar from the year 1402 aj. the first session of dealing with the gang's accusations terrorists of the hypocrites accused of the people's mojahedin of iran in the 11th branch of the criminal court of tehran province to serve as the head of the court. and the accompanying judicial board is being held and formed. in the 700-page criminal complaint of this case, there are accusations of the legal entity of the people's mojahedin organization and 14 people from the central cadre of this group. this court, considering the presence of taskhiri lawyers present in the court session. shakat family and shakat present and the honorable representative of the prosecutor announce the formality of the court. after the judge's speech, the prosecutor's representative read the first part of the indictment. after the passage of months many people like mohammad hanifnejad saeed mohsen and asghar from that event. they tried to

give an expedited answer, i think the smart money is the court could decide there's no double jeopardy issue here. impeachment is not a criminalceeding. no reputable scholar has ever said it's a criminal proceeding. i think all the work in this field says impeachment is unique and not criminal. i think the real thing to watch is whether the court will agree with smith, yes, we'll decide it and do so quickly. if they decide to decide it, but not issue the decision any time soon, that gives trump what he wants. >> the supreme court is also agreeing to hear an appeal that would upend hundreds of charges stemming from the capitol riot, including against former president trump. what do you make of that case? >> that case is a little more complicated, because that has to do with the federal statute that has codified the crime for which president trump and others have been indicted. one of the issues in this case has to do with whether or not that federal statute is really dealing just with obstruction of judicial proceedings and not really with the obstruction of congressional proceeding, number one. the second issue that would be r

no immunity for criminal acts. he takes a secondary argument says, even if there is some immunity, there's certainly no broader than the supreme court has already ruled in the civil context. in clinton versus john's case, the court talked about where that line is. there is another case called fitzgerald versus mix in the talks about that line. that is the outer periphery of a president's duties, it's the line, it's where you draw the line. if he is engaging in interfering with state administration of election laws, which is not presidential duties, it's the province of the state. even under his argument, he has exceeded the scope of his duties when he acted. therefore, that conduct is not immune from criminal prosecution. >> we also saw jack smith file a motion on wednesday, seeking to block trump from making political arguments during his federal election interference trial. okay, is that a pipe dream? what do we see happening with that? that is gonna be almost impossible to stop trump from making such political noise. >> well, impossible, but don't forget, oh, i'm sorry. >> go ahead, glenn. >> impossible, don't forget we have judg

really painful, really, the chain of checks that has no place until 2017 was the second issue of legal cases entering the courts. 75% of all non-criminal prisoners were sent to prison with these bad checks. on average, 1950 checks are bounced in our system. 3 to 4, 5 to 6 times, prison doors were opened 10 times a day only because of returned checks. 10 people go to jail every day for having checks. places where the law in iran goes back to 1955, and many attempts were made to correct it. czech law. it was about 40 years ago. and these have no proportion with the stunning advances in information and communication technology, electronic banking and supervisory systems for financial transparency and control in order to prevent and deal with economic corruption in recent years. to get their rights, they had to pay legal fees and lawyer fees. they used to go up and down the steps of the court for a few years to cash out their money. i got a check from the so-called "casboy" from a servant god. now , he delayed us for 5 or 6 years because he was going to give me tomorrow and i was going to give him next week. the bazaars said that the retur

no cases of fever. in connection with the death of twelve-year-old veronica, a criminal case has been opened. improper execution. in the basmanny courttal, according to investigators , businessmen deliberately bankrupted their own enterprise so as not to pay off a large loan with the bank. the day before, the basmanny court had already sent the former representative of the plant, alla kutsakova, to pre-trial detention; the head of the sales department of zuhrazi ediny is now under house arrest. the chairman of the investigative committee of russia met with students of the moscow st. petersburg academy of the investigative committee of russia. orphans and children left without parental care are in the area of ​​special attention. news. traditions. maxim shevchenko, lead: duty department. now there are operational news that our editorial team receives directly from the information feeds. in the czech republic, new footage has been released from the scene of the shooting in the charles university building on jan paloch square in prague. it is known that of the victim and dozens of victims, this has already been confirmed by the czech po

no. this is a criminal case. this is -- this is the mighty halls of justice. this is, again, this motion to the supreme courtbe explained by their dyer desire on timing. there is no imperative public need to have this trial in march of next year. what's the imperative public need on that? no, it's convenient politically because, otherwise, it's very unlikely, given normal judicial procedures and processes that this won't be decided before the election. and that's the worst of all worlds for them. >> laura: the voters? >> yeah. >> the voters don't seem to buy into any of this. >> listen, we will see what happens. i have to say the one law that they can't manipulate is the law of inintended consequences and so far it's not worked that well for them on this. >> laura: chris alan day, you made some complicated great to see you as always. >> ukrainian president velasquez came to deck to -- j.d. vanc hey, i just got a text from my sister. you remember rick, her neighbor? sure, he's the 76-year-old guy who still runs marathons, right? sadly, not anymore. wow. so sudden. um, we're not about to have the "we need life

order to obtain it, you have to go through seven circles of hell, there is no criminal liability for failure to comply with a courtcutor’s office comes, cancels these criminal cases, and says, these are family matters disputes, there is no criminal case here, we fought in exactly the same way with natasha for a long time. years before this story ended happily, so if it weren’t for natasha’s persistence, if it weren’t for the fact that she devoted her entire life to getting her child back during that period of time when every day there are at least five complaints to different authorities , when every day is calls, when every day is a competent introduction of social networks with a portrait of radeon, please help find the child, in the end it worked, they found it, if not for all this persistence and inadequate dedication to this story, perhaps such a miracle. would not have happened, what alexandra said about the personal initiative of parents, and full involvement, this is a way of life, and i very much suspect that you do not have other small children, as there are, for example, others who need to devote heroin

the check has no place until 2017 , the second issue of legal files entering the court was 75% of all non-criminalprisoners were sent to prison by these bad checks. on average, 1950 checks are bounced in our system . 3 to 4, five to 6 times , the prison doors were opened 10 times a day just because of returned checks. people go to prison every day for having check papers, the law of which in iran dates back to 1955 and many attempts were made to reform it. the check law is related to 40 years ago and there is no compatibility with the stunning developments in information and communication technology, electronic banking and supervisory systems for financial transparency and direction control. there is no prevention and countermeasures for economic purposes in recent years. on the one hand, the entrances to the prison are run by the rich, on the other side, the losers who had to pay legal fees and lawyer fees for a year or two to get their rights. let it be criticized, what did i get from the so-called you, from a servant of god who has been with us for 56 years now?

well, in general, until the court’s decision, laskin is not a criminal to call my client a murderer; you have noefender. so, well, what do we have there? vlaskin's case, did you find anything? we’re working, love, yeah, we’re working, after all, it’s one thing to fight, and another to kill a person in cold blood, you know, i scoured the internet, found information about zendeev’s clinic, in general, he writes that zindeev was a very fashionable popular psychologist in moscow, with a bunch of clients in patkeh for new ideas, this is with his method, but what’s cool? do you hear, ivanova writes, i will complain, the statements are already ready, swindler, let me try to contact those who are dissatisfied, maybe besides vlaskin there were also clients who sold dachas, great idea, and i’ll go to the office, maybe the security guard who took vlaskin out on the street after the fight still works there, we need to find out where this napkin with our client’s blood came from. good afternoon. hello, you have been assigned. unfortunately, dr. zendeev will not be able to see you, will he? no, i am lyubov al

criminals, the 3rd suspect, aaron gilbert remains on the run. mitchell and hail are due back in court january. 3rd. >> when the trial continues in dublin, philippe djegal all kron. 4 news. >> no criminal charges are going to be filed in the vallejo police killing of sean monterrosa. a 22 year-old was shot and killed outside of a walgreens store back in june of 2020. detective jarrett tonn and 2 other officers responded to reports of looting at that store when they encountered monterroza detective tom opened fire through the windshield of his police cruiser. police later claim the time miss took a hammer. the monterrosa had in his pocket for a gun. a year later. attorney general rob bonta picked up the case for review. and in a new report, bonta says there is just not enough evidence to prove that the officers were not acting in self-defense. bonta also says there's not enough evidence to say that the officers are trying to cover up the shooting when they replaced that broken windshield. although no criminal charges will be filed in the case. bonta says his office is working with the layup police to issue several reforms, including a new policy that prohibits officers from sho

criminal defendant. and so what is happening now is that instead of it going di directly to the supreme court after the trial judge made the decision and said, no donald trump, you do not have muimmuni, we're not going to dismiss this case against you, you're going to go to trial. instead it's going to go to the d.c. circuit court of appeals. they are indicating they are ready to go very fast. they have oral arguments set for january, which is really fast for that court, and could rule quite soon after that. we won't know until they do. but then after that, then it would go potentially back to the supreme court, where the question would be posed again and the supreme court would have to decide if they take it. >> so, that could have affected the supreme court's decision, how quickly the appeals court is taking this up. just to be clear, this needed five votes from the justices, right? we don't know if there were any -- or not, none made public. >> it was one line denying the petition at this time. they do know and they do see that the d.c. circuit was moving very fast with this appeal. we just don't know what the thinking was or what the vote w