you're watching the news still to come a new cold war in cyberspace that's what some experts are calling russian solder attacks they say were aimed at the government and private computer. that's right coming right up with business interests. i just. you accidentally shed some taken again in the trows. time in the field. can you get out. with him code oh a serious. shift this week on d.w. . freedom of expression. of value there talking ways has to be defended and new. all over the world. of freedom freedom of art. a multimedia project about artists and their right to express their views freely. d.w. dot com the freedom. it's the cold war but not as we know it it happens in cyberspace and i read joint statement the us britain and australia accuse russia of espionage and planning to sabotage western infrastructure. and trade war on not sign of the economy is back to full. as new official figures out today. this is the business live from berlin belfast in a joint declaration the us britain and australia accused russia of preparing cyber attacks on computer networks could. used to sabotage cr

what is the strategy for the nation in terms of cyberspace? i think that strategy being developed in terms of how we defend ourselves certainly is important and it would lay out roles, responsibilities, functions of the major elements of our government. i think that that is obviously one of the things that would help both internally for the elements of our government, but also externally, as you say, to provide a set of left and right boundaries, perhaps, for our adversaries to understand. >> i think a determination to create where those boundaries are and what we might do may need to be made outside of your agency, but inside your agency i can't imagine a more important person to be at the table when we try to determine what -- how that -- how that determination could actually be implemented. i think there's a strong sense that there's too much of no price to be paid at this point by people who try to either steal our intellectual property or interfere with elections or whatever else they might try to do. the other area where i think you may

debate on the future of all things you also coming up the cold war honestly knowing what happens in cyberspace and i never joint statement the us britain and australia accused russia of espionage and planning to sabotage western infrastructure and. it is known as a castro alex chancellor merkel who first of all and germany's ambassador to space now asked not to stand against preparing is the next big step as commander of the international space station. i'm sumi someone's got to go to have you with us french president a man on the call has condemned a rise in authoritarianism in the e.u. and urged europeans to defend their democracy mccall was outlining his vision for the future of europe in a speech to the european parliament in strasbourg he said the e.u. was failing to address the fears and concerns of its citizens and that change is long overdue. he should read don't think there is doubt in a number of european countries and month after month these doubts seeing others call our foundation this into question the fundamental there seems to be a sort of european civil war national selfishness

russia denies the allegations but western security experts are warning a new cold war in cyberspace is in full swing. the hacking accusations against russia came at a rare joint statement the british and u.s. cyber agency said russia could be laying the foundation for future offensive cyber attacks they warned that hackers backed by the russian government were targeting government and private computer networks the hackers aim to compromise key hardware like routers and fire walls that would give them virtual control of data flows allowing them to steal critical data and plant the ability to carry out cyber warfare the attacks weren't limited to the two countries australia also accused kremlin back hackers of targeting hundreds of companies. the the points which forces for us as a government and should reinforce for all the struggle is that vigilance is absolutely imperative the security and the announcements come at a time of growing concern about russia's cyber activities last year the us ordered civilian government agencies to remove casper's key antivirus software from their network

so again, google, the sovereign of cyberspace, is for much of the world and then you china and russia with a few other small exceptions and a few other places. this brings us to the ranking digital rights and the map we show of the companies that week cover. we have selected and we would like to rank more than 22 but resources enable us to rank 22. we have selected 22 of the most powerful internet color communication companies in the world. when you read them up they are shaping the digital lives of most of the world internet users. so, not just north americans and western europeans but when you add up the companies you got the severance of cyberspace and the top two mobile device sellers whose operating systems through google android or samsung and apple are shaping the digital lives of how people will then access other platforms and you got a selection of ten telecommunication companies that are because of the global footprint operating across the world are affecting the digital lives and ability to access their net platforms. that is how we select the screw. you all got a four page

because there isn't going to be deterrence in cyberspace. you can forget that. the only thing you can have is a convention similar to chemical and biological weapons. you need the powers to sign up, and right nowen i don't see moscow doing that. >> good evening, thank you very much for coming and speaking this evening. my question, if you look at networks, the epitome or kind of later result of those networks is globalization to some level. and i just would like you to kind of discuss globalization and more specifically when do you think that we hit that globalized state, so to speak? because i know that's a debatable point. >> it's a subject i've written quite a bit about. my empire which was published, what, 2002, was in some ways a reflection on the history of globalization. the central argument of that book was that there was a first iteration of globalization when the british empire created in the course of the 19th century very large and very well-integrated markets based at least in principle on free trade, on free capital movement and on a very large sca

preparing a global attack moscow denies the claims experts say get ready for a new cold war in cyberspace and watch out caffeine addict your local starbucks might be closing down for an afternoon that is the coffee giant says it will shut eight thousand stalls for racial awareness training. and daniel winter and this is a business update the international monetary fund is predicting a global slowdown in growth in the next few years that's due to aging populations lackluster productivity as well as the threat coming from protectionist trade policies in the short term things look rosy the lending agency predicts a worldwide growth of nearly four percent that's this year and next and that would be the fastest pace since twenty eleven the u.s. economy will benefit from president trumps tax cuts which are likely to boost the country's economy through to twenty twenty growth is predicted to move up to almost three percent however those tax cuts combined with increased spending could be damaging in a few years' time the i.m.f. warns the eurozone is expected to benefit from continued low interest

so again, google, the sovereign of cyberspace for much of the world. then you have china and russia and a few other small exceptions in a few other places. which brings us to ranking digital rights and the map we show of the companies that we cover. now, we've selected -- we would like to rank more than 22, but resources enable us to rank 22. but we've selected 22 of the most powerful internet mobile and telecommunications companies in the world. when you add them up, they're shaping the digital lives of most of the world's internet users around the world. not just north americans and western europeans but really when you add up these companies, you've got, you know, the sovereigns of cyberspace, the top two mobile device sellers, whose operating systems, both through google android via samsung and apple, are shaping the digital lives of how people are then accessing other platforms, and you've got a selection of ten telecommunications companies that are, because of their global footprints, operating across the world, affecting the digital lives and th

are preparing a global attack mosco denies the claims experts say get ready for a new cold war in cyberspace. it caught out the latest u.s. sanctions are affecting russian companies even though it's not directly targeted and cuba's economic reforms fail to create a boom there are some surprising success story. i bet fizzle and let's do business this. ever attacks have been going on for some time but an even bigger one could be on its way russia says don't look at me as missing today's warnings from london and washington as. the hacking accusations against russia came in a rare joint statement the british and u.s. cyber agency said russia could be laying the foundation for future offensive cyber attacks they've warned that hackers backed by the russian government were targeting government and private computer networks the hackers aim to compromise key hardware like routers and fire walls that would give them virtual control of data flows allowing them to steal critical data and plant the ability to carry out cyber warfare. the attacks weren't limited to the two countries australia also accuse

the new cold war will be carried out in cyberspace and the russians are particularly adept at that.warning on first, expect some trouble, but things like that have gone up 400% since we bombed syria, attacks from the russians on social media, the bots that are out there, it is a new world, but at least it will not cause any bloodshed, at least not yet. 0k. let us bloodshed, at least not yet. 0k. let us look at another story on the front page of the sunday telegraph, facebook given one week to protect children. facebook has already been under huge pressure over a number of different issues. yes, it is a slightly hysterical headline. as if it is going to make a blind bit of difference, whatever facebook do and i wonder if mark zuckerberg has actually consider the idea that he might do everyone a favour and say i have created a monster, i'm going to switch it for a bit and let us think about how to get it right. this is jeremy hunt, the health secretary, who is very concerned about the impact of technology on children's health. particularly their mental health. particularly their menta

the battlefield, as she said before, warfare is now notjust about the battlefield, it is about cyberspacethere is a fear the russians will hit back through cyber—attacks. they increased the number of trolls spreading propaganda. that'll be the revenge we will get. but, umm, people count up we will get. but, umm, people count up the idea of children being gassed in syria and cyber—attacks, they know which one will be easier to counter. a massive increase in the numberof kremlin counter. a massive increase in the number of kremlin linked trolls spreading propaganda about the airstrikes on line. this is why it is so important theresa may gets out there and get in front of it. it is a few days too late. the government knows the propaganda is coming and needs to get out in front of it as quickly as possible. trump has been convinced to stay in syria. he was suggesting he would pull out troops soon. the us ambassador to the un says it will not be for another six months. he did not do so personally. but donald trump is going to pull out troops, he announced that last year. he ran on it to get in

cyberspace and information warfare and space. the army vision that we developed for winning this environment outlines a few things you must be able to do differently and better. we have to be ready to a ploy -- to employ rapidly. we have to open -- overcome our adversary is the fences to maintain that access and employ success. we have to maneuver bowlby and deliver overwhelming effects through every domain. we must do all this faster than the enemy. to achieve the vision i will out wine, outline, we have to presume three major ways of efforts. we have to do this with a high and fights. meal --nd is we need a a new talent management system focused on talent management and we need programsodernization and also haveasis delegated the importance of army command to do -- two great leaders. they have driven us very hard stand thiss to summer. all of the progress they are making over priorities and much of that has been enabled by some legislative changes done by congress and allows us to use andr transaction abilities bring items much

putting measures in place to deal with governments, and with the things that could go wrong to cyberspacet of it and be extremely positive. everything is mark zuckerberg, that has to stop. is the trust issue as well. exactly. facebook is not dead, not by half a shot but the thing is that it has clearly got great big holes in the management. absolutely, and i mean also if you look at facebook generally, you talk about money being wiped off it as easily, you can put money back on it in a day. absolutely right. with the right leadership, it will come back to. let's talk about this next story, psa is the french manufacturing firm. it talks about wanting to invest money in the uk despite brexit, the manufacturer is going to invest 100 million euros to increase production capacity at it lesion plant. what is your take on this than? surprise? —— luton plant. plant. what is your take on this than? surprise? -- luton plant. my ta ke than? surprise? -- luton plant. my take on this is aimed pleasantly surprised. apart from germany, britain is the largest manufacturer of cars in europe, bar none. and

. >> brad smith of microsoft has called for a geneva convention in cyberspace. who do you think should be involved in that process if you think that the existing infrastructure that we have from a legal perspective is insufficient to deal with the effects that attacks may have on civilian populations. >> i very much back the idea of an international convention. we've all been interested in informed parties that would include governments, ngos and players in the whole cyber universe. to discuss this incredibly important question. because there are two issues that have somehow got to be reconciled. one is that until a few years ago what people most valued about the internet or cyberspace was the fact of its democracy, the fact it was open, the fact it provided a huge number of opportunities, that people could get information if they weren't blocked as they are in some places like china and elsewhere, that this is wonderful and it could transform the world in wonderful ways. but then we see the inevitable he happen, which is people learn how to game that system, ho

you're watching the news still to come a new cold war in cyberspace that's what some experts are calling russian cyber attacks they say were aimed at both government and private computer. that's right coming right up with business for just. accidentally shot some of. the trolls. spending time in the field. when you get out. with him could always serious. shift this week on g.w. . the freedom of expression. of value there in ways has to be defended and you. all over the world.

we becoming more reliant on cyberspace we are all targets. the committee has a strong bipartisan track record on this issue. we've passed bills to expedite hiring and enhance cyber threat information sharing. we also recently secured 26 million to support election infrastructure. in january, the house approved thalandmark bill to create a standalone organization to elevate cybersecurity mission at the dhs. i am hopeful the senate will get this bill to the president's desk very soon. another area of concern for me is aviation security. i have been very disappointed tg to be honest at the slow pace of the tomography scans and airports. however i was pleased to see that we secured 65 million in the omnibus to begin installing the technology immediately. these scanners provide a three d. imagery to help stop other threats from boarding airplanes. compared to the technology we have now it's the difference between an x-ray and an mri. the 2019 budget request also requested additional 71.5 million that will certainly help but i don't believe that is

there has been an awful lot that needs ramping up, the way we do with security, not least with cyberspace about the security service than most people, certainly of the three people, certainly of the three people he, but it is about how you tackle it. ithink people he, but it is about how you tackle it. i think what comes across really clearly from this is it is about eight step change —— step change. it is controversial. it gives people like town hall is devolved administrations, government departments, giving them an early warning of potential suspects. it is about beefing up security at sporting events and concerts. that will have an impact on all of our lives. it is about arresting people more quickly. there are a lot of issues here about human rights, civil liberties, and things like that. but it is only a draft strategy. yes. some quite controversial stuff. very controversial stuff. very controversial stop. first of all, the way the sunday times is putting it, that you arrest suspects before they finalise their attack plans. a kind of think good, i would rather we got them before the

they're an example of the use of language before there was cyberspace to communicate attachments to ideals and new ways of imagining women apart from men's version of women. then there's a chapter that's very much about the wakening of lesbian women and pursue of rights, voice, visability or separation and film with the side bar on what were the first sort of mainstreamed and characters like and being difference in vilification dramas. we have a whole section on music, arts and the contributions of women like judy chicago, the art school that allowed women to pursue a different approach to visualizing women and celebrating the body in ways that are not necessarily pornographic. big chapter on reproductive rights, same-ole, same-ole, safe contraception if desired. the degree that women were to question a physician or demand information which now seems obvious and you can, in fact, do your own research to a degree through sometimes questionable but often useful websites and then finally, chapters that look at women in antiwar movement, peace camps movement as we lived in nuclear annihilation

i believe every single day, and in both the information space and the cyberspace, we are fighting right now in our contested environment is actually inside the continental united states. >> are i think that is well-taken, and i would agree with you. but i think sometimes we have a tough time publicly being able to discuss how serious that threat is. assuming that we're actually fighting it right now at home, is this something that happens once in a while, is this something that happens occasionally? is this a case of where you're concerned about somebody checking to see whether or not they can get into your plans, or how deep does the threat -- how deep does the threat -- just for the public, how deep is the threat to our ability to actually wage war and keep the kinetic war off of our home borders? >> the american public needs to understand how advanced the cyber threat has become. so advanced, that an adversary can everyday -- and i believe that every single day across this country, an adversary or potential adversary is probing us to see how we operate, where our most important data

debate on the future of these you also coming up the cold war because as we know it it happened in cyberspaceand in a rare joint statement the us britain and australia accuse russia of espionage and planning to sabotage western infrastructure. and is known as an astro power.

a couple issues that jump off the screen to me were cyberspace, information security, and missile defense. i'm curious your thoughts on how that aligns with the pentagon's own priorities, particularly as outlined in the national defense strategy earlier this year. representative thornberry: i think they are closely aligned. the key feature of the new national defense strategy is we are going to have to pay greater attention and put greater peerasis on near- competitors. states that have been advancing capabilities while we have been cutting our defense budget. if you look at what has happened in the world recently, cyber has been a key tool that countries have been using. obviously the threat from north korea with missiles that can reach the united states, very that makes missile-defense very important. all of the hybrid warfare, and other unconventional types of warfare we have seen, we have to the able to defend the country in all of these domains, not just when tanks come over the hills in a traditional sense. i think the emphasis for this year's bill is, number one, repair the militar

infiltrated every single orifice of our interaction with each other and our interaction with these cyberspace that's going to libya is called the dewey decimal system it's called going to the library and researching in that space again is getting rid of your smartphone but i mean that's not really probably in the sixty's they burn the draft cards so you're saying went on to burn our smartphone. free surveillance plane well you have to do it environmentally sound way because there's a lot of toxic stuff as i do to come up you know find some images i think the surveillance catalyst. might have a hard time selling to me because i put in some freaky search warrants for ninety nine percent of my searches are for max kaiser so it's all very self reflective of narcissistic you can come spy on me all day long and you learn all about me. learning about myself. ok well surveillance capitalism drives much of the internet is behind most of the free services and many of the paid ones as well is goal is psychological manipulation in the form of personalized advertising to persuade you to buy something or d

problematic for pompei o is his willingness to attack moscow's behavior in syria in ukraine and in cyberspace something donald trump has up until recent days been reluctant to do here's what paul said last month about vladimir putin he continues to view the greatest. the greatest failure of the last century the dissolution of the soviet union is. bent on returning the former soviet union to its greatest glory but john glaser of the cato institute says peo knows how to stay in his boss's good graces he knows how to talk you know way that doesn't offend trump and he knows how to bolster tom's sort of attitude and confidence it's unlikely the u.s. senate will reject pails nomination ultimately it's worth recalling that he will be advancing donald trump's view of the world not his own. al-jazeera washington. the daughter of the former russian spy who was poisoned along with her father last month in the u.k. has declined of russian embassies offer of assistance you need a script i was making his first public statement after leaving hospital the u.k. accuses moscow if he was an innovation to attack

problematic for pompei o is his willingness to attack moscow's behavior in syria in ukraine and in cyberspace something donald trump has up until recent days been reluctant to do here's what pompei o said last month about vladimir putin he continues to view the greatest. the greatest failure of the last century have been the dissolution of the soviet union he is. bent on returning the former soviet union to its greatness and glory but john glaser of the cato institute says knows how to stay in his boss's good graces he knows how to talk in a way that doesn't offend trump and he knows how to bolster trump's sort of attitude and confidence it's unlikely the u.s. senate will reject tom pails nomination ultimately it's worth recalling that he will be advancing donald trump's view of the world not his own rosalyn jordan al-jazeera washington. still ahead on the bulletin a u.s. cost of this video shows its agents trying to force an injured man back into mexico . we didn't take a broad enough view of our responsibility and that was a big mistake mark sacramento gets a vote for a ride on the second d

tech accord is intended to protect consumers from what microsoft president brad smith calls the cyberspace, this is pretty interesting. considering what facebook just came out of, this declaration that we are not going to help the government, it seems pretty bombastic to me. >> i think we have to look at the uptick in the number of individuals that work and it tell general agencies that fashion themselves like the sociopathic heros leaking technology and government information because they think it's a heroic thing to do. if i were a tech company i would be wary of the chelsea mannings and the edward snowden. nsa technology discovered vulner bills in windows technology. if i'm and software company i will look at the past track record and say maybe it's not the best thing in the world to give information to intelligence agencies who leak like a pot with a strainer. >> it's been a very difficult week for the tech world. our founding fathers didn't have cell phones so we have this issue with the fourth amendment. security concerns and our right to privacy. what we learned from the facebook he

the issue that really is not defined by geographic location is malicious actors in cyberspace.ow does that moment of defense impose higher costs on adversaries to violate norms of behavior using cyber means particularly where those actions don't rise to the level of armed conflict. and between building capacity capability to counter these threats and what metrics we use to know if we get the balance right going forward? >> this is a growing area. and having this conversation, the dynamic threat, we have 7% increase in the budget for our cyber efforts and you are aware congress directed us to separate cyber command and nsa without losing those synergy of those organizations. as we expand not only the defense of our dod networks and offense capability but also defend the nation which is led by sec. nielsen, but we have the bulk of the capability of this so what we are doing about it is creating offenses plans. i won't go into detail but you can imagine what they look like. we are increasing our defenses internally. the challenge is when we go to the defend the nation effort we ar

and there are some strategic decisions to be made about how we do that to include what we do and cyberspace so each ship is more capable but also i would tell you that this is part of an integrated force and nobody can integrate their forces in the world better than we can right now. >> thank you mr. secretary. i want to talk about the ready reserve perspective is projected that are ready reserve force carries over 90% of readiness lift if called upon and already reserved for us today, 46 ships average 43 years old. in fact, we have maintained some of the only hosting plans left the world on board ships. they are essentially floating smithsonian institute displays. some have speculated that in a conflict the limiting factor will be c. general, i know you talked about that about where we are that. what steps are we pursuing to address what we believe is a strategic agency. >> i want to take that photographer and i met with the commander of the sea left and there is a way to make the ships and not just modernize them at just a cheap price and we are also going to buy certain types of ships in

in an epic four day rampage through cyberspace, he shared videos by scott adams posting a photographin a make america great again hat and earned two retweets from the president of the united states. progressives are almost unconscious with rage. "rolling stone" magazine calls west's tweets or real threat. author and columnist mark steyn knows it's a threat. what are his tweets a threat to? >> there a threat to the lockstep of popular culture in the united states. to some extent, i'm not unsympathetic to that. some people are mocking us conservatives because when some beatniks dig like kanye west come on, we all get so excited. he's giving us the eye. i love the fact that -- i remember in the 2000 election going to the republican convention and being given the folder to show which celebritie celebrities -- it was a detective piece of paper with two names on one side. it was pat boone and one of the oak ridge boys. seven of them are democrats there was something terribly refreshing and having no purchase on pop culture. the fact is, we are not really excited. it's not so much the excit

down a particular path on a standard or working a problem that can have an impact on the satellite cyberspace side that simply is not recognized, or the attempt to apply a model that works in one domain of technology and try to miss apply it to the space domain. and, of course, a natural reaction is everyone always pleads wider special so natural reaction is to say just another special interest group is why they should have special treatment. being able to actually go more technically deeper with the regulatory agencies and with the department agencies as to why you need to work certain problems differently on the space side then what you would do in the terrestrial communication side, or non-communications capabilities. i think that's really the hard question. the space council i think provides a good mechanism for doing that, , for bringing the leadership to bear but the leadership doesn't always know what's happening on the front lines, and industry or the technology and out of the markets and cutting edge. that's not necessary their job. so our job in white house is to make sure we presen

of the problems is in the intelligence community muscle is extremely difficult in the realm of cyberspace to apply the principles of proportionality as well as secondary effects on individuals who may be part of the network went through whom the network may run until you get to the bad actor mitigating the impact on the innocence. one thing we talked about is in addition to the government being disorganized, their goals of retaliation of warfare that apart from law-enforcement need to be re-examined. were so used to dealing in the physical world that were not looking at the principles. it doesn't compute. the other thing is we talked about government were broader issue with our electoral processes being one. similar problems being engaged. one thing is different is that wallets incredibly important for us to treat the internet as a marketplace of ideas under law where ideas information is exchanged there is a bit of naÏvetÉ in a generation that relies heavily on the internet that everybody is a relatively good actor. at the end of the day truth of the critic you of how you will somehow wi

of events would happen, we'd get a call to the situation room so we could make sure that in the cyberspace, in the digital space that there was no communication between this individual and anybody in the united states and that there were no other copycat/follow-on attacks that were being planned. >> we'll leave it there for now. sam vi nigrad, josh, thank you. >>> we have more straight ahead on this breaking news out of germany right after this. ♪ it's a lot easier to make decisions when you know what comes next. if you move your old 401(k) to a fidelity ira, we make sure you're in the loop at every step from the moment you decide to move your money to the instant your new retirement account is funded. ♪ oh and at fidelity, you'll see how all your investments are working together. because when you know where you stand, things are just clearer. ♪ just remember what i said about a little bit o' soul ♪ are you one sneeze away from being voted out of the carpool? try zyrtec®. it's starts working hard at hour one. and works twice as hard when you take it again the next day. stick with zyrtec® a

continued surveillance, destruction of communications and networks, threats and every domain including cyberspace, including urban terrain. the army vision that we developed to win in this new environment outlines a few things you must be able to do differently and better. we had to be ready and able to deploy rapidly, not just the regular army but the guard reserve as well. we have to overcome our adversaries defenses, make sure we can gain a foothold, maintain access, and that exploit success. we have to remain mobile, and quickly deliver precisely in overwhelming effects. through and across every domain. we must do all this faster than the enemy. to achieve the vision i will , we have to moment pursue three major lines of effort in my mind. the evolution and propagation of multi-domain battle constant through guard to the high-end fight. drive. that that will the second is we need a new talent management system that is focused, personnel system focused much more on talent management. third, we need to transform the acquisition system by standing on army futures command. those three things are

. >> sir, as you know, we have a fair amount of money that's given to our cyber command for cyberspace operations. and we have a number of mission teams. ut these are primarily focused on our own defense, department of defense and offense against an adversary for the defend the nation mission comes under the secretary of homeland security, secretary neilson. we are in close contact with her. we have the only capability to try and defend, whether it be an electrical grid a financial system, something like that. and i think that right now we need to get a lot stronger in the defense of our critical infrastructure. all aspects of it. i realize that some of that could come under the department of defense, which is going to take congressional initiative and action in order to balance the constitutional safeguards for our citizens with the reality that we've got to be able to protect them. this is an area that needs a lot of work. i'll be the first to admit it. mr. garamendi: in a hearing that ms. stefanik had yesterday it became clear the coordination between the department of homeland secu

and it needs to be clear in the media and in cyberspace. ms.n innocent victim of a diabolical scheme. >> how did that word come to you? and what do you mean now about diabolical in this scheme? >> die ball co-- diabolical, th something evil. you're sorry that the first theory was wrong. >> absolutely. it's a terrible thing to accuse an innocent person. >> were the apologies enough? your county authorities are doing the walk of shame saying we have got this terribly wrong. >> i appreciate the apologies, but the apologies don't rebuild your life. and the apologies don't undo what's been done. i'll carry this around for the rest of my life. >> to attempt to get justice for michelle, her lawyer, michael, filed a lawsuit against angela diaz, ian diaz and the city of anaheim. a spokesperson for the city of anaheim issued a statement, which reads in part, we believe our detectives properly followed the evidence. we are letting the legal process play out. >> the and i'm police department didn't create the situation, angela diaz did. we did what we had

ntelligence community less so particularly in the military, to truly difficult for the realm of cyberspace to apply, and david --e talked about this principles of proportionality as well as secondary tertiary effects on individuals who may .e part of the network mitigating the impact of weather -- of whatever you may do on the innocence. one of the things we've been talking about is that in addition to our government being highly disorganized although working in that direction, there retaliation of warfare responses need to be re-examined. so used to dealing in the physical world we are not designed to apply those principles of retaliation to the extra physical world. compute.oes not the other thing, we talked about government. this is a much broader issue of our critical infrastructure protection. our electoral processes being one. .ne thing that is different while it is incredibly important for us to treat the internet as , wheretplace of ideas ideas and information is exchanged, there is a bit of naivete particularly in a generation that relies so heavily on the internet. that everybody

problematic for pompei o is his willingness to attack moscow's behavior in syria in ukraine and in cyberspace something donald trump has up until recent days been reluctant to do here's what pompei o said last month about vladimir putin he continues to view the greatest. the greatest failure of the last century japan the dissolution of the soviet union he is. bent on returning the former soviet union to its greatness and glory but john glaser of the cato institute says pompei o knows how to stay in his boss's good graces he knows how to talk in a way that doesn't offend trump and he knows how to bolster trump's sort of attitude and confidence it's unlikely the u.s. senate will reject pomp ailes nomination ultimately it's worth recalling that he will be advancing donald trump's view of the world not his own rosalyn jordan al-jazeera washington. facebook last month zuckerberg has admitted that his own personal information has been compromised while talking to or taking questions from u.s. politicians about the breach of users privacy as i sat through two days of hearings in washington d.c. afte

real challenge is trying to translate the essence of journalistic ethics back to this space, cyberspace, social media where it is desperately wonting. >> i think what rohan and ash are doing, they would be the first ones in the dnc. the rnc is concerned about this as well to admit this is just a first step, identifying it and saying to people, here's what it is is one step. but then how do you get them to stop retweeting it? you can't force people to not believe something they want to believe that somebody -- remember -- i mean a lot of this came up in parkland, right? you have a young woman who is a survivor of a mass shooting and she's ripping up a target from a shooting range and they manipulate the image to show that instead she's ripping up the constitution and it goes viral. >> look, you bring up a great point. i think that you need to understand that there are multiple stakes in this quagmire of a problem. i think it would be good to think about this and look to perhaps other topics, other industries that have addressed problems that i think of as something similar -- sugar. do i

coats testified earlier this year, russian influence operation in cyberspace are intended to achieve strategic objectives and will continue less and until there are clear repercussions for russia. in february lieutenant general knack sew knee testified to the armed services committee that the russians amongst several other adversaries don't fear us and have said not much will happen to them in retaliation for cyber attacks. cyber command rogers testified to the armed services committee that vladimir putin has concluded there is little price to pay for russian aggression against the united states and has no incentive to is to be hybrid attacks. outgoing national security advisor mcmaster's last remarks admits that we have failed to impose sufficient costs on russia. in the absence of presidential leadership to stet a policy to send a message to our foreign adversaries that we will not stand for attacks of this nature, the national defense authorization act for fiscal year 2018 requires a comprehensive plan from the administration to counter russian maligned influence. that plan is ove